Skip to main content
Normal View

Tuesday, 19 Oct 2021

Written Answers Nos. 418-437

Freedom of Information

Questions (418)

Aengus Ó Snodaigh

Question:

418. Deputy Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Minister for Tourism, Culture, Arts, Gaeltacht, Sport and Media her views on findings of the Office of the Information Commissioner (details supplied); if her statement on the matter was made on the basis of legal advice received by her Department or if it is her opinion; further to Parliamentary Question No. 59 of 22 September 2021, if the new decision-making process differs from the previous process in respect of freedom of information referred to in her response. [50936/21]

View answer

Written answers

I would refer the Deputy to my previous response on this matter as set out in Parliamentary Question No. 59 of 22 September 2021. 

As previously stated, my Department is satisfied that the third party organisation concerned fully cooperated with the process at all times and provided all records that fell within the scope of the request for each decision and that there is no basis for any suggestion that this organisation engaged in any action that would come within the scope of Section 52 of the FOI Act. 

The Office of the Information Commission Investigator, who proposed that a second decision making process be undertaken, did not include in their report any reference to records having been altered in a manner that would give rise to a violation of Section 52 of the FOI Act. I am advised, therefore, that legal advice was neither required nor sought in relation to this matter.  

Finally I am advised that the records released by the decision maker in my Department under the second decision making process were consistent with the records provided in the original decision and the only additional records that were provided were those that were created in the interim.

I trust that this is of assistance to the Deputy in clarifying this matter.  

Question No. 419 answered with Question No. 410.

Universal Basic Income

Questions (420, 422, 423, 424, 426)

Aengus Ó Snodaigh

Question:

420. Deputy Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Minister for Tourism, Culture, Arts, Gaeltacht, Sport and Media the reason a tendering process is necessary to engage with stakeholders on the pilot basic income for artists; and the reason this cannot be managed in-house by her Department given that the plan for the world café event is already outlined in detail in her Department’s tender. [50967/21]

View answer

Aengus Ó Snodaigh

Question:

422. Deputy Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Minister for Tourism, Culture, Arts, Gaeltacht, Sport and Media if potential applicants to the tender for facilitating stakeholder engagement on the pilot basic income for artists were informed of the tender by anyone in her Department either before or independently of the notice uploaded to the website of her Department and the sharing of the link on the social media account of her Department (details supplied) on which reference to the basic income pilot was not highlighted in the notification. [50969/21]

View answer

Aengus Ó Snodaigh

Question:

423. Deputy Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Minister for Tourism, Culture, Arts, Gaeltacht, Sport and Media her views on whether the decision to put the facilitation of stakeholder engagement on the objectives and eligibility criteria for the pilot basic income for artists out to tender be taken to mean that her Department has not developed draft objectives or eligibility criteria over the 11 months since the scheme was proposed in the report of the arts and culture recovery taskforce or prior to allocating €25 million towards the scheme in budget 2022. [50970/21]

View answer

Aengus Ó Snodaigh

Question:

424. Deputy Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Minister for Tourism, Culture, Arts, Gaeltacht, Sport and Media the reason that less than two days were given between the announcement of €25 million being allocated to the pilot basic income for artists in budget 2022 and the deadline for applications for the tender to facilitate stakeholder analysis on the pilot basic income for artists; and her views on whether the announcement greatly alters the nature and urgency of the stakeholder engagement for tender. [50971/21]

View answer

Aengus Ó Snodaigh

Question:

426. Deputy Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Minister for Tourism, Culture, Arts, Gaeltacht, Sport and Media the reason there is no mention included in the tender for stakeholder engagement on the development of the pilot basic income for artists to ensuring engagement with economists, experts on arts funding in Ireland and abroad, experts on basic income proposals or organisations concerned with workers’ rights and social justice in the development of the scheme; and if her Department engaged with any of these groups prior to announcing €25 million for the scheme in budget 2022. [50973/21]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 420, 422, 423, 424 and 426 together.

I was particularly pleased to announce €25m for the pilot Basic Income Guarantee Scheme for artists as part of Budget 2022. This scheme will bring new life and support to the arts and culture sector, and I hope it will provide an important legacy for our artists, after the very difficult circumstances they have endured over the last year and a half.

This is a major policy intervention and is grounded in on-going dialogue with the sector. The upcoming stakeholder forum is a continuation of the engagement myself and my officials have had with the sector on this matter.

The facilitation of 'World Café Method' style events is normally carried out by experienced professional communications experts and facilitators, familiar with the methodology, to ensure that the outputs of the forum, which will be large in scale, are effective and contribute to the ongoing development of this policy.

I can assure the Deputy that economic and evaluation skills are central to the manner in which policy is developed in my Department. The team lead on the pilot scheme is an economist and member of IGEES (Irish Government Economic Evaluation Service) and my Department's Strategic Policy Unit, which is staffed with six members of IGEES, are also assisting with the policy development for the pilot scheme. My officials have been engaged in extensive policy development to bring this policy intervention to fruition in conjunction with colleagues on the Oversight Group which includes the Departments of Finance, Social Protection, Housing, Local Government and Heritage, Public Expenditure and Reform, as well as Enterprise, Trade and Employment. The Directors of the Arts Council and Screen Ireland are also members alongside a representative of the County and City Managers Association.

As the Deputy will be aware, the pilot basic income guarantee scheme was a key recommendation from the Arts and Culture Recovery Taskforce. I established an Oversight Group, which includes the Arts Council and Screen Ireland, to appraise the recommendations in the Life Worth Living report.

I asked the Group to prioritise the basic income guarantee pilot and the Oversight Group has met 8 times. To assist in these discussions, the Oversight Group established a subcommittee to focus solely on the progression of the recommendation for the basic income pilot scheme. This sub-committee met 9 times over the summer months to develop a number of options that could fulfil the requirements as set out in the Life Worth Living report.

A number of organisations have given presentations to the Oversight Committee in order to inform their considerations these include:

- the NCFA (the National Campaign for the Arts)

- Social Justice Ireland

- Praxis – the Artists Union

- Dr Stephen Kinsella – Economist in University Limerick and Niamh NicGhabhann & Annmarie Ryan who had done research in the area of artist basic income

- In addition, Equity the actors union are due to present to the group this week.

The Request for Tender (RFT) clearly sets out that the facilitation relates to the basic income guarantee pilot for artists. The RFT was published on my Department's website, shared via social media as well as being sent to a number of companies that specialise in this type of facilitation.

I am satisfied that a professional facilitator will add value to the stakeholder forum and ensure that the voices of artists, arts sector representative bodies and resource organisations will be heard on this important matter.

Question No. 421 answered with Question No. 410.
Question No. 422 answered with Question No. 420.
Question No. 423 answered with Question No. 420.
Question No. 424 answered with Question No. 420.
Question No. 425 answered with Question No. 410.
Question No. 426 answered with Question No. 420.

An Teanga Gaeilge

Questions (427)

Aengus Ó Snodaigh

Question:

427. D'fhiafraigh Deputy Aengus Ó Snodaigh den Aire Turasóireachta, Cultúir, Ealaíon, Gaeltachta, Spóirt agus Meán an ionann an, additional €7 million package for Irish language, fógartha ar shuíomh na Ranna do Cháinaisnéis 2022 agus an €6.3 milliúin fógartha sa Cháinaisnéis féin, nó an bhfuil €0.7 milliúin nár luaitear sa Cháinaisnéis; agus an difear idir an dá fhigiúir a mhíniú. [51051/21]

View answer

Written answers

Gabhaim buíochas leis an Teachta as deis a thabhairt dom soiléiriú a thabhairt ar allúntais chaiteachais Cháinaisnéis 2022 mar a bhaineann le mo Roinn.

Cuimsíonn an €0.7m luaite sa cheist, €200,000 breise atá le cur ar fáil d'Oifig an Choimisinéara Teanga in 2022 chun cur ar a gcumas tuilleadh foirne a earcú le freastal ar na héilimh bhreise a bheas orthu mar gheall ar fhorálacha nua Bhille na dTeangacha Oifigiúla (Leasú) 2019 atá ós comhair an Oireachtais faoi láthair. 

Ina theannta sin, leithdháileadh méadú €500,000 ar phá an Chláir mar chuid den mhéadú foriomlán ar phá ar fud na Roinne le haghaidh costais foirne. Meastar go n-earcófar foireann bhreise mar chuid de seo in 2022 chun aghaidh a thabhairt ar na riachtanais a eascraíonn as Bille na dTeangacha Oifigiúla (Leasú) 2019.

Sports Funding

Questions (428)

Michael McNamara

Question:

428. Deputy Michael McNamara asked the Minister for Tourism, Culture, Arts, Gaeltacht, Sport and Media when the next round of the 2021 sports capital programme will be announced; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [51073/21]

View answer

Written answers

The Sports Capital and Equipment Programme (SCEP) is the primary vehicle for Government support for the development of sports and physical recreation facilities and the purchase of non-personal sports equipment throughout the country. The 2020 round of the SCEP closed for applications on Monday 1st March 2021. By the closing date, over 3,100 applications were submitted seeking over €200m in funding. This is the highest number of applications ever received.

The scoring system and assessment procedures were published earlier this year and all applications are being assessed accordingly. Approximately one thousand of the submitted applications were for 'equipment-only' projects. These applications were assessed first and grants with a total value of €16.6m were announced on the 6th August.

The remaining applications for capital works are now being assessed. This work is ongoing with allocations for all successful applications expected to be announced in the coming months. Once these allocations are finalised an announcement on the timing of the next round of the Programme will be made.

Departmental Offices

Questions (429)

Peadar Tóibín

Question:

429. Deputy Peadar Tóibín asked the Minister for Tourism, Culture, Arts, Gaeltacht, Sport and Media the estimated amount spent by her Department on the procurement, purchase and rent of new office space; and the amount spent on the procurement, purchase and rent of office equipment in each of the past ten years and to date in 2021. [51113/21]

View answer

Written answers

As the Deputy will be aware my Department in its current configuration was formed  in June 2020  following the formation of the Government.  The Deputy will be further aware that the range of responsibilities coming within the remit of the Department were subject to change to change during the period covered by his question.

The information requested by the Deputy in relation to my Department's expenditure on office equipment (including furniture,  IT equipment , fixed-line telecommunications hardware, photocopiers, printers and scanners) is set out in the table below.

Year

Expenditure

2011

€53,262

2012

€31,304

2013

€63,038

2014

€39,133

2015

€56,383

2016

€12,305

2017

€429,162

2018

€115,714

2019

€75,240

2020

€89,132

2021

€27,183

Total

€991,857

With regard to expenditure on the  procurement, purchase and rent of new office space as the Deputy will be aware in general, matters relating to the acquisition and leasing of property for my Department are the responsibility of the Office of Public Works. 

However, I am advised that my Department also leases office accommodation for Oifig an Choimisinéara Teanga from Údarás na Gaeltachta as set out in the Table below.  This lease which commenced in 2014 was taken over by the Department from the OPW in June 2016.  Expenditure in this regard is set out in the Table below.

Year

Expenditure €

2011

€0

2012

€0

2013

€0

2014

€0

2015

€0

2016

€0

2017

€48,019

2018

€48,019

2019

€48,019

2020

€48,019

2021 (to date)

€38,267

Total

€230,313

Departmental Offices

Questions (430)

Peadar Tóibín

Question:

430. Deputy Peadar Tóibín asked the Minister for Tourism, Culture, Arts, Gaeltacht, Sport and Media the number of offices currently being rented or in ownership of her Department which are currently not in use by the Department. [51130/21]

View answer

Written answers

In general, matters relating to the acquisition and leasing of property for my Department are the responsibility of the Office of Public Works. 

The Department also leases offices from Údarás na Gaeltachta for Oifig an Choimisinéara Teanga, An Spidéal, Co. Na Gaillimhe.

All offices are in use by the Department.

Sports Funding

Questions (431)

Peter Burke

Question:

431. Deputy Peter Burke asked the Minister for Tourism, Culture, Arts, Gaeltacht, Sport and Media if her Department, through Sport Ireland or another aegis, can provide funding or support for a feasibility study in relation to a capital project (details supplied); and if she will make a statement on the matter. [51199/21]

View answer

Written answers

The provision of a new pool in the area in question is a matter for the local authority in the first instance.

In relation to my Department's role, support for any new swimming pool projects is now being provided under the Large Scale Sport Infrastructure Fund (LSSIF).  The LSSIF was launched in 2018 to provide Exchequer support for larger sports facility projects, including swimming pools, with at least €100m being made available over the period to 2027. The scheme is designed for projects where the grant being sought is greater than the maximum grant available under the Sports Capital and Equipment Programme (SCEP). The first allocations under the LSSIF were announced in January 2020 and, thus far, approximately €86.4m has been awarded to 33 different proposals including 8 swimming pool projects.. 

Funding under the LSSIF is provided under two Streams. Stream 1 is designed for projects at an early stage of planning  to enable applicants to advance their proposals to a stage where a Stream 2  application (assistance towards actual construction costs) can be submitted. Projects that already have a feasibility study completed are likely to receive a higher score at assessment stage. 

While the priority in the short term is to advance all of the successful projects, as it is now over 18 months since the first allocations were made, and in view of the issues faced by grantees as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, it is timely to review progress on all projects allocated grants. My Department is engaging with all grantees in this regard.

Once that review is complete the scope for awarding new grants to projects which missed out under the first set of allocations and the timing of any new call for proposals will be considered. It is expected that the review will be completed in the coming weeks.

Citizens' Assembly

Questions (432)

Neasa Hourigan

Question:

432. Deputy Neasa Hourigan asked the Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage the progress made to date in relation to the programme for Government commitment to establish a citizens’ assembly to consider the type of directly elected mayor and local government structures best suited for Dublin. [50978/21]

View answer

Written answers

Under the Programme for Government, the Government aims to establish a Citizens’ Assembly in 2021 to consider the type of directly elected mayor and local government structures best suited for Dublin. 

The Department of the Taoiseach, which is responsible for this matter, has informed my Department that consideration is being given to the appropriate methodology for future Citizens' Assemblies, guided by the experience of the Gender Equality Assembly which completed earlier this year. An independent researcher was appointed by the Assembly to monitor and record, amongst other things, the perceived deliberative quality of the Assembly. This report, published in July 2021, will assist in decisions on future Assemblies' use of virtual meetings.

While there has been some preliminary engagement on the issue of the Dublin Citizens' Assembly between my officials and the Department of An Taoiseach, the specific timing of the Assembly has yet to be confirmed.

Housing Schemes

Questions (433, 475, 476)

Richard Boyd Barrett

Question:

433. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage the social welfare payments that are calculated for the purpose of the assessment for social housing; if he will provide details of the payments that are exempt; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [51041/21]

View answer

Richard Boyd Barrett

Question:

475. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage the way that income is assessed for the purposes of social housing support, including details of income limits, allowances per child, payments that are included in calculation and if the working family payment is included for the purposes of the calculation; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [51039/21]

View answer

Richard Boyd Barrett

Question:

476. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage the income limit for a family of two parents and six children registered on the housing lists in Dublin to be eligible for social housing; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [51040/21]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 433, 475 and 476 together.

Applications for social housing support are assessed by the relevant local authority, in accordance with the eligibility and need criteria set down in section 20 of the Housing (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 2009 and the associated Social Housing Assessment Regulations 2011, as amended.

The 2011 Regulations prescribe maximum net income limits for each local authority, in different bands according to the area concerned, with income being defined and assessed according to a standard Household Means Policy. The 2011 Regulations do not provide local authorities with any discretion to exceed the limits that apply to their administrative areas.

The income bands are expressed in terms of a maximum net income threshold for a single-person household, with an allowance of 5% for each additional adult household member, subject to a maximum allowance under this category of 10% and separately a 2.5% allowance for each child.

A table setting out the details of the three bands and the limits currently applicable in each local authority area is available on the Department's website at the following link: https://www.gov.ie/en/publication/04c69-social-housing-support-table-of-income-limits/.

Under the Household Means Policy, which applies in all local authorities, net income for social housing assessment is defined as gross household income less income tax, PRSI, Universal Social Charge and Additional Superannuation Contribution. The Policy provides for a range of income disregards, and local authorities also have discretion to decide to disregard income that is temporary, short-term or once-off in nature. However, with the exception of the specific payments listed in the Household Means Policy as being disregarded, all income from social insurance and social assistance payments, allowances and benefits, including Working Family Payment, is assessable.

More detail on what income is assessable and the full list of disregards is available on the Department's website at the following link: https://www.gov.ie/en/publication/fb1f2-social-housing-support-household-means-policy/.

The determination of whether an applicant household meets the income criteria is based on a calculation of their preceding 12 months’ net average income prior to the date of receipt of application. This ensures that the most comprehensive picture of a household’s current and previous income is available at the point of carrying out the assessment.

The income bands and the authority area assigned to each band were based on an assessment of the income needed to provide for a household's basic needs, plus a comparative analysis of the local rental cost of housing accommodation across the country. It is important to note that the limits introduced in 2011 also reflected a blanket increase of €5,000 introduced prior to the new system coming into operation, in order to broaden the base from which social housing tenants are drawn, both promoting sustainable communities and also providing a degree of future-proofing.

Given the cost to the State of providing social housing, it is considered prudent and fair to direct resources to those most in need of social housing support. The current income eligibility requirements generally achieve this, providing for a fair and equitable system of identifying those households facing the greatest challenge in meeting their accommodation needs from their own resources.

As part of the broader social housing reform agenda, a review of income eligibility for social housing supports in each local authority area is underway. As set out in "Housing for All - a New Housing Plan for Ireland", the efficiency of the banding model and its application to local authorities will be considered. Equivalisation as between singles and families will also be considered. The review will also have regard to new initiatives being brought forward in terms of affordability and Cost Rental housing. I intend that the review will be completed this year.

Student Accommodation

Questions (434)

Rose Conway-Walsh

Question:

434. Deputy Rose Conway-Walsh asked the Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage the total approved loans by the Housing Finance Agency to universities for student accommodation since 2018; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [51193/21]

View answer

Written answers

I refer to the reply to Question No. 325 of 28 September 2021. The position set out in the response has not changed since that date.

Housing Schemes

Questions (435)

Richard Boyd Barrett

Question:

435. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage if the 20% discretionary HAP uplift can be applied to an ongoing tenancy in which a tenant has received a rent increase and cannot afford to pay any further top up to the landlord; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [50372/21]

View answer

Written answers

The Housing Assistance Payment (HAP) is a form of social housing support for people who have a long-term housing need. If a household has been deemed eligible for social housing support, it is a matter for the local authority to examine the suite of social housing supports available, including the HAP scheme, to determine the most appropriate form of social housing support for that household in the administrative area of that local authority.  

Each local authority has statutory discretion to agree to a HAP payment up to 20% above the prescribed maximum rent limit to secure appropriate accommodation for a household that requires it, or up to 50% in the case of homeless households in the Dublin region.  It is a matter for the local authority to determine, on a case by case basis, whether, and to what extent, the application of the flexibility is warranted.

All households in receipt of HAP pay a differential rent based on the rent scheme set by the relevant local authority. The right of local authorities to set and collect rents on their dwellings is set out in section 58 of the Housing Act 1966. The making or amending of such schemes is an executive function and is subject to broad principles laid down by my Department including that; the rent payable should be related to income and a smaller proportion of income should be required from low income households; and that provision should be included for the acceptance of a lower rent than that required under the terms of the scheme in exceptional cases where payment of the normal rent would give rise to hardship.

Local discretion and flexibility are inherent in the devolved function of administering rent schemes.  Decisions regarding the increase or decrease in the rent charged to tenants of local authorities are matters for individual local authorities in accordance with its differential rent scheme.

While there is no legislative provision precluding HAP supported households contributing towards the monthly rent required by the landlord, local authorities have a responsibility to ensure that tenancies are sustainable and that households in HAP are in a position to meet the rental costs involved.

The Programme for Government commits to ensuring that HAP levels are adequate to support vulnerable households, while we increase the supply of social housing. My Department continues to keep the operation of the HAP scheme under review. Under Housing for All, my Department will undertake an analytical exercise to examine whether an increase in the level of discretion available to Local Authorities under HAP is required, in order to maintain adequate levels of HAP support.

Property Registration

Questions (436)

Dara Calleary

Question:

436. Deputy Dara Calleary asked the Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage the status and reason for the delay on a Property Registration Authority, PRAI, application by a person (details supplied) which is ongoing for over two years. [50377/21]

View answer

Written answers

In relation to any specific cases with the Property Registration Authority (PRA), arrangements have been put in place to facilitate the provision of information directly to members of the Oireachtas.  Further information in relation to the specific case referred to may be obtained by contacting the dedicated e-mail address in respect of the PRA at reps@prai.ie.

Local Authorities

Questions (437)

Pauline Tully

Question:

437. Deputy Pauline Tully asked the Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage the level of funding that was allocated to each local authority in 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2021; the level of funding that was allocated specifically to each local authority housing section in 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2021; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [50427/21]

View answer

Written answers

The funding system that applies to local authorities is a complex one, as authorities derive their income from a variety of local sources including commercial rates, charges for goods and services and funding from Central Government.

Central Government funding of local authorities similarly presents a complex picture, with transfers, both current and capital, coming from a wide range of Departments and Offices, not solely from my Department, for a variety of purposes. Some streams of funding are delivered directly from funding departments to local authorities, while others are routed through departmental agencies. 

Most of the funding sourced from Central Government and provided to local authorities must be used for specified services. These can be grouped into 5 broad programme categories: recreational, education, environment, housing and transport.

In 2020, total transfers of funding from all central government sources to local authorities totalled €6.08 billion. Additional detail on Central Government funding of local authorities is provided in the Comptroller and Auditor General's Annual Report, accessible at the following link: 

 https://www.audit.gov.ie/en/find-report/publications/2021/chapter-3-central-government-funding-of-local-authorities.pdf.

Across all schemes and funding sources, my Department provided €2.61bn, €3.02bn, €3.99bn, and €1.52bn to local authorities in the years 2018 - June 2021. The breakdown of total funding provided by my Department is in the associated table. Details of the total housing expenditure from my Department is also in an associated table. With regard to the housing figures it is important to note the following;

- The figures represent expenditure across the various housing programmes.

- The figures represent exchequer expenditure and LPT self-funding expenditure across the housing programmes, capital and current.

- The figures for Limerick City & County Council includes payments to the local authority in its role as the Housing Assistance Payment (HAP) Shared Services Centre (SSC). This SSC manages all HAP related rental transactions for the tenant, local authority and landlord.  Accordingly, my Department does not recoup individual local authorities in respect of HAP rental payments in their administrative areas but, rather, recoups all landlord costs via the HAP SSC

Top
Share