Skip to main content
Normal View

Redundancy Payments

Dáil Éireann Debate, Tuesday - 9 November 2021

Tuesday, 9 November 2021

Questions (453, 454, 464)

Willie O'Dea

Question:

453. Deputy Willie O'Dea asked the Minister for Social Protection the number of persons who will be excluded by the clause which prevents former community employment supervisors from getting the proposed once-off gratuity payment if they had already received a statutory redundancy pay out; the number who will receive the proposed once-off gratuity payment; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [54687/21]

View answer

Willie O'Dea

Question:

454. Deputy Willie O'Dea asked the Minister for Social Protection if she will consider withdrawing the clause which prevents former community employment supervisors from getting the proposed once-off gratuity payment if they had already received a statutory redundancy payout; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [54689/21]

View answer

James Lawless

Question:

464. Deputy James Lawless asked the Minister for Social Protection if she will provide clarity on payments to community employment supervisors whose schemes have now closed and if they will be included in the negotiations (details supplied); and if she will make a statement on the matter. [54152/21]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 453, 454 and 464 together.

As the Deputy will be aware, CE supervisors and CE assistant supervisors have been seeking for several years, through their union representatives, SIPTU and Forsa, the allocation of Exchequer funding to implement a 2008 Labour Court recommendation relating to the provision of a pension scheme for CE supervisors and CE assistant supervisors who are employed by CE scheme sponsors.

This claim creates some difficulties because the State is not the employer of the supervisors.

Within this context, officials from my Department and the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform held discussions on proposals to progress and resolve this complex issue, while having regard to the wider budgetary framework. Department officials also held discussions with unions representing CE supervisors and CE assistant supervisors.

At the start of April this year, agreement was reached between the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform and the Minister for Social Protection on proposals to resolve the long-standing issue. These proposals included a financial package.

Since that time, discussions on these proposals took place between my Department and the unions representing CE supervisors and CE assistant supervisors, in consultation with other relevant Government Departments; the Department of Expenditure and Reform and the Department of Finance.

Department officials wrote to both SIPTU and Forsa recently setting out the terms of a full and final settlement. The total value of the financial element package now on the table is in excess of €24 million.

The final settlement has the potential to benefit up to 2,200 existing and former CE supervisors and CE assistant supervisors subject to certain qualifying criteria.

As the proposal is currently under consideration by the representative unions, it would not be appropriate for me to comment further on the discussions at this time.

I trust this clarifies matters for the Deputies.

Question No. 454 answered with Question No. 453.
Top
Share