Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Friday, 17 Nov 1922

Vol. 1 No. 30

ESTIMATES FOR PUBLIC SERVICES. - REPORT OF THE DÁIL SITTING IN COMMITTEE.

That the Dáil sitting in Committee, having considered the Estimates for—

Universities and Colleges,

Old Age Pensions,

Hospitals and Charities,

National Health Insurance Commission,

Valuation and Boundary Survey,

Public Record Office,

Endowed Schools,

Science and Art,

National Gallery,

Congested Districts Board,

Ireland Development Grant,

Stationery Office,

Ministry of Industry and Commerce,

Local Loans,

Exchequer and Audit,

Temporary Commissions,

Representation of the People Act.

Property Losses Advances,

Secretariat and Special Services,

Reconstruction of Cork,

Civic Guard,

Ministry of Home Affairs,

Relief Grants,

Property Losses Compensation.

Rates on Government Property.

Local Taxation Adjustment,

Customs and Excise,

Tailteann Games (Grant in Aid),

Secret Service,

Ordnance Survey,

in 1922-23, recommends that the full Estimate of £18,329,822 for the Financial Year, 1922-23, be adopted in due course by the Oireachtas.

Congested Districts Board

£169,750

Ireland Development Grant

159,500

£329,250

I move that the Dáil agree with the Committee in the said resolution.

I second the motion.

I just want to say that I hope that the example of the procedure set in the presentation of these Estimates will not be followed henceforward. I am not quite certain of the procedure in other places, but I think it would be a very good example to show that in presenting these Estimates for particular Departments, the Minister responsible for the Estimates and responsible for the expenditure should make a statement to the Dáil of his policy, and his intention in regard to the expenditure. It is not satisfactory that the introduction of these Estimates should be laid upon the Minister for Finance who obviously cannot possibly be in a position to give details or explain to the Dáil the purpose of the monies. It is the only real control that the Dáil has or will have over Departmental administration, and I think the occasion should be availed of by the Minister responsible for the Department, to explain fully the policy of the Department, and any departures from past procedure that he intends to put into operation. It is only by such means as that that we are able to co-operate in the actual administration of the country's affairs, and if the Parliament is to be the co-operator in that work they must be made acquainted by the Minister responsible with the affairs of the Department, and not wait for criticism for information to be extracted. It seems to me to be the obvious duty of the Minister responsible for the administration of the department, and the preparation of the Estimates, and the spending of monies that are to be voted, that he should make some statement in regard to the administration. I want to put in a formal protest against this procedure, and to ask that in future, at any rate, the Minister responsible shall explain the Estimates, and give some outline of his policy in regard to the Department when presenting these Estimates.

I would like to say as a private member that it is very difficult for this Dáil to get a thorough grasp of the work of the Departments from reading the bald statements and bald figures like those submitted to us. Our Government is following the examples of other Governments. In the British House of Commons, I understand, they submit volumes of figures of this kind, and they are quite satisfied with it. In America, I understand, a different system is followed. Now, take the Board of Agriculture: A Committee of the whole House I understand is set up, a small Committee representative of the whole House, and the business of the Board of Agriculture is laid before this Committee. They know the schemes the Minister has in his hands; they know the policy he is submitting. You can never get into touch with the work of any Minister by asking questions. It is the duty of the Minister for the sake of self-preservation to give the baldest reply he can. If he does not say the answer is in the affirmative he will go so far as to say that it is in the negative, that is all you know about it. It does not matter if you get at him and you approached him in another direction; he is there, and you will get a shorter answer still. It is human, and I do not blame the Minister at all. I think this Dáil should set up a group of Committees, one dealing with law, one dealing with land, one dealing with education, and so on. The members of this Dáil are entitled to know what is going on, and they are ready to share in it. I am not blaming the Minister. The system does not allow it. I suggested at the time that some system of Committees should be provided for in the Constitution. But there were some obstacles to that. I would suggest to the Ministers or to the President, that he should introduce some measure setting up some system of Committees like that. The more closely the members of this Dáil are associated with the working of the State the healthier and better for the Minister and the country. At present we only ask questions and are getting very little information.

I just heard the the last few sentences of Deputy Johnson's remarks, and I thoroughly agree with him for the first time in this Session. I think it is right procedure that when the Estimates are presented, Ministers should survey the whole sphere of their Departments, and explain what progress has been made or is expected to be made, and state the reasons why the monies asked for are required, and to what extent they will be necessary to expedite the work of each Department. Otherwise if the procedure that has been followed in the presentation of these Estimates is adopted, the only information that is given is information that happens to rise out of any question that may be asked. Now, there may be very important phases of a Department's work that are not at all touched by the questions that are projected at the heads of the Ministers, and therefore we are only getting a very inadequate conception of what is the nature and the scope and the condition of the work of the Department. I would suggest simply with the idea of making a helpful suggestion, that in future when the Estimates are presented, they will not be put forward in this bald manner, leaving it to members of the Dáil to conjecture what is the meaning of this maze of figures and statistics, but that the Minister shall in presenting the Estimates explain as fully as possible in the time at his disposal the work in which his Department is engaged, and the reason why the monies he asks are demanded from the Dáil.

I honestly think that is a reasonable request; the sooner you take the public into your confidence the better. Otherwise there will be rumours and insinuations and all that sort of thing. I think explanatory memoranda would be the best thing to accompany these Estimates from each Department. In the memoranda particulars could be given as to what has been done in the departments, and what is required. I think that would be stepping on to the right road. The people in the country are critical; there are mischievous people circulating rumours, and if they have plain figures nobody can be deceived.

Deputies will remember that on introducing these Estimates, on the 6th October, I think it was, I went into some details with regard to them. It is the first time we have produced Estimates, and it is possible that the old procedure which was in operation in the last Dáil might be considered a useful precedent to be adopted in future. I do not much approve of that old system, which practically amounted to the Minister in charge of the Department painting the work that had been done—work in some cases, I should say, that was supposed to be done, or that he would like to have done—for the consideration of the Assembly. I recollect some of these reports, which gave a very glowing description, and which I am positively convinced were exaggerated. Now, with regard to those Estimates, we must make up our minds sooner or later upon a definite policy, or upon the adoption of a definite line with regard to our finance. If the Dáil were to adopt what has been suggested by some Deputies, it is quite possible that the interests of the country would not be best served. In other words, if you take from a particular department or a particular Minister control which is direct and immediate and which must be of a tight ening character, and spread that control over a great number of shoulders, naturally the purse will not be as tightly held as if it were under the control of a single individual subject to certain regulations which he must carry out. In the ordinary way the Estimate provides three parts, one of which is the sum involved. As far as the Dáil is concerned if it votes a sum, the distribution, the expenditure and the correct accounting of it is distributed over a very small number of persons and the Minister for Finance for the time being must exercise considerable control over those funds. If, on the other hand, it should happen that each Minister would be personally responsible to the Dáil it can be easily seen that the actual tight control does not operate in a case of that sort, and that the road is open for a certain looseness which is certainly very inadvisable at the starting of a new State. Deputies ought to realise that there were various operations to be performed before we were in a position to produce these Estimates. In the ordinary way the administration was to be practical until this provisional or transitory stage should pass. In addition to that there were, as I have already explained on other occasions, not alone adjustments and arrangements and conferences, closing up of old accounts, arranging new methods and so on, but also a considerable number of visits had to be made to London to regularise matters. There was no time at our disposal for considering this question of the best method of introducing Estimates, and I do not know if it would have been reasonably possible in the case of the majority of the Estimates to have indicated any line of policy with regard to the Minister in control. Take, for instance, Local Government. The Minister there has got certain regulations to attend to. He has not, at his own sweet will, the right to say, "yes" or "no" with regard to the matters before him. He is bound by laws, regulations and instructions. The Minister for Finance is in somewhat the same position. He can only make payments where they are regularly authorised. If there were in mind, let us say, the establishment of a new currency and so on, any alteration in a matter of that sort would be of such a magnitude as to have been impossible of completion in six or seven or nine months, and I have very little hope of being able to consider such a question in a way in which it would be possible to produce anything in a satisfactory manner within the next twelve or even eighteen months, or possibly longer. The Dáil, I admit, has been particularly indulgent with regard to the Ministry, but I do not know that the criticisms, in so far as I have listened to them, would serve any useful purpose at this moment if the Government were to consider putting them into practice. It has been suggested there should be a number of Committees. I am satisfied that in the fixing up of the Constitution Ministerial control was to a very large extent in the Deputies' minds. I do think that if the setting up of Committees had been at that time in the minds of Deputies it ought to have been introduced into the Constitution. It is unreasonable to have then indicated that Ministerial control was to have been the order of the day, and to suggest now that Committees should operate. If the pressure of business continues as it has for the last few months I do say there would be scarcely any time for a Minister to attend such Committees. The number of matters requiring attention, the amount of documents to be read, reports to be considered, the various decisions to be given, do not admit, as long as the day continues to occupy 24 hours, of any further experiment with regard to that. You cannot have Committees of such a sort and at the same time attach responsibility to the Minister. With regard to the particular financial control that you would have, there are only two or three systems in operation. Our minds have turned towards the one which has been described as the most perfect. We are operating on that line. I expect if it be found unsuccessful or unsuitable in this country it will be altered, but I am not now in a position to indicate any great extension on the information that has been supplied by Deputies, until the Ministers have had a good deal more experience of their offices. Some of the Ministers are in the particular offices which they occupy two or three months only; they were absolutely new to the work, and some of them were unacquainted with the officers in charge of the departments. We must remember this is a legislative assembly, and if the Dáil has to be concerned with so many matters requiring attention by the Legislature, and if the attendance of Ministers here be considered an essential in that connection, and I believe it is, it would be unreasonable to expect Ministers to be in such direct touch with the ordinary operations of their Departments as to submit reports regarding the conduct of these Departments and the policy that is involved.

I would just like to say that the Ministry has quite misunderstood the import of my remarks. At any rate I am not suggesting any devolution of responsibility from the Minister. I am suggesting that the Dáil is to have information, if it is to be confided in, as regards the working of the Ministry. The Minister in introducing a request that the Dáil should vote for his administration a certain sum of money, should give that Dáil some information as to what the money is for and not a mere bald statement that salaries cost so many thousand pounds. We, at least, should be taken into the confidence of the Minister, when we are asked to vote a certain sum of money, and as I said in the opening of this contention, I am not pressing the matter of criticism with regard to the present presentation, but I hope it will not be taken as a precedent of the future. The Minister has said that it is not considered possible for the Ministers who were recently placed in charge of particular departments to deal with those matters in the full way that we ask. That may be so, but it is infinitely more difficult for the Minister for Finance to do so. He introduced these Estimates and asks for a blank cheque, without any indication of what the intention of the Minister is. I foresee, unless something like what I am contending for is done, some future Parliament will say: I am not going to give you any more money until you tell us what it is for, and that is the only cure. The whole object of the presentation of Estimates is to enable the Dáil to be in possession of the policy of the Ministry; otherwise, it has simply to be a case of extraction by force; that is certainly not desirable.

There are rather more than 20 Estimates to come before this Dáil yet. May I suggest to you that a procedure worth considering would be that these should be taken henceforward, not necessarily in the order in which they stand here but in departments. That is to say all estimates affecting the department of one Minister should be taken together. The Minister need not be here all the time, but while those Estimates were under discussion in the Dáil in Committee, the Minister should be present to meet every criticism made. Each Minister should be here for just that section of the Estimates that deals with the Votes under his general department.

Question put: "That the Dáil agrees with the Committee in the said resolutions."
Agreed.
Barr
Roinn