Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Thursday, 26 Mar 1936

Vol. 61 No. 3

Vote 64—Wireless Broadcasting (Resumed).

Go ndeontar suim ná raghaidh thar £38,700 chun slánuithe na suime is gá chun íoctha an Mhuirir a thiocfaidh chun bheith iníoctha i rith na bliana dar críoch an 31adh lá de Mhárta, 1937, chun na dTuarastal agus na gCostaisí eile a bhaineann le Fóirleatha Neashrangach (Uimh. 45 de 1926).

That a sum not exceeding £38,700 be granted to complete the sum necessary to defray the Charge which will come in course of payment during the year ending on the 31st day of March, 1937, for the salaries and other expenses in connection with wireless broadcasting (No. 45 of 1926).

Debate resumed on the following amendment:—
That the Estimate be referred back for reconsideration. —(Deputy McGilligan).

I should like to say that I consider there has been some improvement in this particular service since I raised the matter last year. So far as the news service, and the presentation of that news are concerned, there has been, generally speaking, a very welcome improvement. We certainly have got away from the position which obtained previously when, on so many nights, there was no news service. The news broadcast now is pretty exhaustive and, on the whole, is presented fairly well. At the same time I think it will be admitted by those who listen-in that there is still room for improvement. There has been a decided improvement in the programmes generally, but while I say that I do not think that anybody is satisfied with the standard of the Irish broadcasts. There has been, as I have said, just a slight improvement. The main reason for that is that the amount of money devoted to the service is not sufficient to enable those in charge to engage the talent which, in my opinion, could be obtained in the country. I think it ought to be recognised that this is a national service and that the programmes are listened to by people not only in this country but in many countries throughout Europe, and we ought to aim at having the programme broadcast from our station at least on as high a level as the programmes of some of the countries on the Continent. It would, of course, be absurd to think that we could get programmes as lengthy or of the same high standard of excellence as, say, the British Broadcasting Corporation, which has an immense income and which has large sums of money available in order to get broadcasts from people who are at the top of the various professions.

I would like to draw the Minister's attention to the question of lectures and talks—giving information about certain matters. These could be made very useful and could prove very valuable for the community at large. We had a number of interesting talks during the year, and we also had a number of talks that were neither interesting nor creditable to the State. I think the sooner we get away from talks of the latter type the better for the credit of the State. I trust the Minister will do all he can to encourage talks of an informative nature, not too highbrow, talks which will be of value to the ordinary people in the country.

I think the wireless could be utilised to a far greater extent in conveying useful information to the people. Unfortunately, owing to the very high duty on wireless sets, wireless is not availed of in this country to the same extent as in other countries. For instance, wireless sets are not very numerous amongst the agricultural community. If they were readily available it might be possible to convey to the agricultural community valuable information in a more effective way than through the medium of leaflets, which cost so much and which are really so useless. I refer now to the leaflets issued by the Department of Agriculture.

I would like to hear from the Minister what was the result of the appeal made regarding Sunday programmes. I think the director of broadcasting invited listeners to indicate whether they wanted the hours from 1 o'clock to 3 o'clock or from 3 o'clock to 5 o'clock. A couple of years ago I advocated a change from 1 o'clock to 3 o'clock to 3 o'clock to 5 o'clock. I am still in favour of the later hours. I think the Minister ought to make an effort to give a longer programme on Sunday. It is the day on which people can find most time to devote to wireless programmes. As it is, we have a gramophone programme from 3 o'clock to 5 o'clock. Then there is a break until 8.30. Then we have a musical programme for an hour, and later there is a sponsored programme, and that practically finishes the broadcast for the night. I think listeners would be glad if there was a more extensive programme on Sundays. I must say that there has been an improvement of late in the programmes broadcast, perhaps not very great, but still an improvement. There certainly has been a very decided improvement so far as the news is concerned

I think it is generally conceded that the evening news has been greatly improved within recent months. Speaking impartially as an ordinary listener, my view about the international news broadcast from our station is that it seems to take its line entirely from the British Broadcasting Corporation. Each evening after the British news is sent over the ether, if one listens to Dublin one finds that there is more or less the same colour and the same outlook in international politics. I am sorry to say that we in the Free State seem to be following the British lines in that respect too closely. We are certainly agreeing with Great Britain in this respect, if not in regard to other matters. I think it was about a year ago, when tuning in at 6 o'clock to London, one heard that Scott and Black had reached Australia. At 6.45 the same evening the Dublin station announced that they were over the Timor Sea.

There is one matter that I mentioned to the Minister before, and I would like to renew my observations. Certain artistes were invited to come from County Donegal to perform in Dublin for Radio Athlone, and they complained that they were given a sum of only £2 2/- or £3 3/- for the performance which they gave, and that their travelling expenses cost them more than the entire fee which they received for performing, with the result that when another invitation was sent to them, some of them declined to come. I appreciate that it is very difficult for the director of broadcasting to give somebody from Cork who has to travel to Dublin, to make whatever contribution he has to make, a higher fee than he gives to a resident of Dublin for the same kind of performance. But it is obvious to me that if we want to introduce traditional singing, traditional violin-playing and a variety of forms of traditional music, the most expert exponents of which are to be found in the Gaeltacht or in the more remote rural parts of the country, we have to make up our minds to pay for it if we are to have it at all.

I think it is an eminently desirable thing that the traditional music of this country should be incorporated frequently in our musical programmes; but I would like to make this suggestion, that we cannot afford to tolerate the same mediocrity in the presenta tion of traditional music that we might afford in the presentation of popular music. I do not think, if you are dealing with the great classics of music, that you can afford to broadcast from a mediocre performance. When you are broadcasting dance music or light popular music it is not a matter of such great consequence whether the performer is highly expert or not. But when you are broadcasting traditional music, with which a great many people in this country and abroad are not familiar, it should be broadcast as perfectly as it is possible to get it done and, therefore, I would have no hesitation in paying an extra fee in order to make it possible for the exponents of that kind of music to come. I suggest to the Minister that the only way that can be done, if he desires to set a standard of fees for similar performances, is to set a standard in the studio and add to that fee the travelling expenses where a person has to come from outside the area of the City of Dublin.

I assume that the income from listeners to the broadcasting service in this country will tend to grow. Certain foreign broadcasting stations, finding themselves with a surplus income, determined that it would be a very good thing to subsidise themselves, or maintain themselves, a really good orchestra, a philharmonic orchestra. The great difficulty in Dublin of maintaining a philharmonic orchestra is that there are not very many wealthy people knocking about and it is extremely difficult to make it possible for any such orchestra in our native city to develop without cohesion and a continuity of work together, which would give the individual musician a fair opportunity of making an adequate contribution to such an ensemble. I therefore suggest that the Irish broadcasting service should seriously consider the question of subsidising the Dublin Philharmonic Orchestra, even if it were only in the form of paying them a regular annual fee in consideration of a certain number of performances before the microphone. I should be glad if it were done in that way, or else that they should be guaranteed a certain annual endowment so that their services might be available to the broadcasting service when they were wanted, and also so that they might provide a centre of musical entertainment for the people of the country generally as well as for the citizens of Dublin.

My third point is that, while we have very interesting and also exceedingly dull talks on the radio, and while we have had some excellent performances on the wireless and also some execrably bad ones, I think we ought to consider whether or not the time has come to extend our invitations for lectures and individual performances a little further afield. For instance, celebrity concerts are held here in Dublin from time to time, and the artistes who appear there, and who, doubtless, require a very large fee for coming to Dublin for one concert, might be persuaded to perform individually over the radio, on the occasion of their visit for the celebrity concert, on, say, a Sunday, at a fee which the broadcasting service might be able to pay. If that could be done, we might consider, later on, inviting them specially to give one or more broadcasts themselves and that would make available to the rural population of the country the enjoyment which those, who can afford to attend the celebrity concert, can have by visiting Dublin and paying for a ticket. That would not be calculated to interfere with the success of such enterprises as the celebrity concerts, because experience has shown that, if you introduce people to the delights of hearing a really great violinist or a really fine pianist over the radio or on the gramophone, the effect generally is that you induce a larger number of people to come up themselves and hear the performers in person.

I should be glad also if the Minister would consider getting persons of distinction in various branches of science and art to come to the radio and deliver lectures. It is quite possible that that could be arranged more economically by relaying from London than by bringing the lecturer to Dublin, because London is more central. I do not know whether you could relay a lecture from Paris or the Continent generally, but I think one might consider the advisability of having lectures from distinguished persons either by way of relay or by inviting them to the City of Dublin. If we begin by using the method of relaying instead of bringing such people to Dublin, I would urge on the broadcasting service the advisability of helping in the future to bring persons of distinction both in science and art to the City of Dublin, because, while the broadcasting service would contribute the bulk of the expense in such a case, individuals or societies, who could not contemplate the extravagance of inviting these people to come themselves, might avail of their presence in the City of Dublin to meet them and in that way would benefit by their presence here and might be able to procure their services for a smaller fee than that offered by the broadcasting service for a special lecture dealing with a subject with which these distinguished visitors are peculiarly qualified to deal, and in that way we might draw to the City of Dublin a number of persons whom it might be of inestimable value to meet and whom we could not hope to induce to come here under other circumstances. In the same way, we would be able to introduce these distinguished visitors to the people at large through the radio.

That is the last matter I wish to touch upon, but I want to invite the opinion of the Minister and of the House to this aspect of the question. I think it is a good thing to let the views of persons of distinction be ventilated in public. I believe in free speech and therefore I would suggest to the Minister that he should be somewhat radical in the kind of talks which he permits on the radio. It is well known that, if a person of distinction is invited to the microphone, neither the Government nor the Director of Broadcasting, nor anybody else, accepts responsibility for the view which the person of distinction is going to express. Such people are simply brought there so that the public at large may hear all sides of every question. I know that it is an extremely delicate and difficult problem to decide where you are going to draw the line as to what is going to be regarded as propaganda and what is going to be regarded as legitimate discussion; but so long as the ring is fairly held and all sides of every question are given, and so long as ample opportunity of ventilating all sides is given, I believe that that is the most effective way of demonstrating clearly that there is no question of prejudice one way or the other. On mature reflection, I am satisfied that the Department ought to set its face definitely and rigorously against discussion on the radio of domestic politics, except, possibly, at the time of general elections. Now, I am as enthusiastic a politician as there is in this country. Some people will say: "Why should you not discuss politics at all times of the year?" I say that you should not discuss them because the people do not want that kind of thing, and because I believe that it would give rise, at the present time in any case, to endless practical difficulties which, in theory, it would be very hard to define clearly. Accordingly, I would be very slow to ask the Director of Broadcasting to open the door to discussions of purely domestic politics. I do not suggest for a moment, however, that the wider issues of political philosophies should not be expounded by Irishmen and by foreigners by way of debate or by way of the reading of discourses on the radio; and I also think that, at the time of general elections, the principal Parties, as well as a fair representation of independent Deputies, should be given access to the radio, as was done, I think, in the last general election with great success and with immense satisfaction to the vast majority of listeners.

I think it would be discourteous on my part if I were to sit down without paying a tribute to the work that is being done by the Director of Broadcasting at the present time. I think that a very great improvement has taken place. We are under an obligation here, of course, to throw bricks whenever bricks require to be thrown; but I think it is equally desirable to throw bouquets when bouquets should be thrown. I think that the wireless service is improving and I am only hoping that it will improve still more. Personally, I am proud to rank myself amongst those citizens who are continually sending postcards to Broadcasting House in Dublin expressing approval or disapproval, as the case may be, and I think that if other citizens would adopt the same course it would be of considerable help to the Director of Broadcasting in the work he is doing and to the service generally.

I have so high an opinion of the talks, lectures and addresses which are given over the radio from time to time that I would like to inquire from the Minister whether he would consider the establishment of a journal for the publication of these valuable discourses. Everybody knows that the talk over the radio, however successful it may be, is in reality only partially a success if it is not recorded so that people can read it afterwards. No matter what enjoyment one gets out of hearing it when being delivered that enjoyment is only half what it would be if one had the opportunity subsequently of reading it in print. A number of the lectures delivered during the past year would, in my opinion be very well worth preserving. I do not see how that could be done except through the medium of a journal issued from the Dublin Broadcasting Station. Other countries have found it necessary to issue such a journal. I think it would be easier to do that here than elsewhere. There are less vested interests in the way of journals in this country that would consider there was unfair competition, if the State engaged in such a business. I suggest to the Minister this matter is well worthy of consideration, in view of the great importance now attached to the radio as an educative medium. It is almost essential if the full function of radio, in present circumstances, is to be achieved that we should have the advantage of a publication like that.

May I say that at no time did I consider that the criticisms levelled at our Dublin station were anything like justified. I think from its inception it has been a good station. A great many people in other countries who have the opportunity of hearing their own stations, and world stations, have been very appreciative of the Dublin programmes. But certainly, during the past 12 months, there has been a very great improvement. I think that such a feature as the trial of John Mitchel, lately given from the Dublin station, would be a credit to any station in the world. In conclusion, I would like to hear the Minister's opinion upon the publication of a journal to record talks and publish other items of news as to our radio programmes.

I would like to add my meed of praise to what has been said, and tell the Minister that, in my opinion, this year has shown progress in the Dublin Broadcasting Station. The concise and clear way in which the news is delivered, in recent months, is a gratification; but with other Deputies who have spoken, I think there are still heights to be reached. Deputy Morrissey mentioned the Sunday programme. I would go further than he has gone and say that to most country people the Sunday programme is a very meagre thing. What would be the objection or what would be the harm in our station broadcasting services from different churches? From the B.B.C. station we get services of various religious denominations, without exception. It is a great boon and help to those who cannot leave their homes—to the afflicted and the crippled and so on— to hear some little note on Sunday as to what Christianity stands for. I also think we might have a further extension of our special feature programme, lectures, talks and so on. I do not know that I want to endorse all that Deputy Dillon said, but there are many different subjects of public interest that we would be gratified to learn more about. Surely we could get many people qualified to speak about these things to talk to us about them, and in that way make our station more interesting than it is.

There is another thing—perhaps I stand alone in this—but it grates on me when I hear the announcement at the end of the sponsored programme. I think it is a blot upon our national institutions that at the end of that programme we hear urged that the purchase of a sweep ticket is the best way to provide for our families. It seems to me to be a lowering of the whole position to find that one of our institutions such as the radio should be prostituted in such a manner. The way in which it is done brings the whole thing down to the level of touting at a fair. I may be peculiar in regard to this, but I do not think it is calculated to raise our national character to the highest standard. Otherwise, I congratulate the Minister on what he has achieved. The programmes are improved, and I hope they will continue to improve.

As everyone on this auspicious occasion has cooed like a sucking dove it would be breaking away from all precedent to say anything that would jar on the ears of the Minister or on those Deputies who suggested amendments. It is a pity that that spirit manifested in presenting those suggestions was not preserved in regard to other suggestions. The lion is lying down with the lamb on this occasion in relation to the suggestions tendered to the Minister for Posts and Telegraphs. Evidently the influence of his beneficent aura has transmitted itself to the Deputies on the Opposition Benches. Yesterday, at the opening of this discussion, only one jarring note was heard and that came from Deputy McGilligan. Jarring notes are not unusual in his case; but when one takes into account the volume of unanimity and general praise that greeted this Estimate, it looks out of place even to refer to that jarring note. Out of the welter of suggestions poured on the Minister, some salient facts came to light. Deputy McGilligan does not like those talks upon prison escapes, those episodic incidents of the recent past, and he does not like the frequency with which the prosperity of Ireland is referred to. It is rather a pity that Deputy McGilligan does not like that. There is nothing new in the featuring of those escapes. If we could listen to the story of how Red Hugh escaped from Dublin Castle, or the story of the night before Kinsale, we would consider ourselves rather fortunate. These recent events may eventually, in the course of years, be invested with as great interest as other episodes in Irish history, which we wish to see portrayed. These escapes should not be deprecated in the jibing tones in which Deputy McGilligan spoke of them. It might be that the manner of telling them of offended Deputy McGilligan's æsthetic sense. The language may have lacked the repose "that stamps the caste of Vere de Vere."

His may have been an æsthetic objection, but rightly or wrongly, being a rather suspicious person, I read into Deputy McGilligan's strictures a sort of jealousy that possibly he was not among the faithful few who were privileged to take part in those glorious adventures, although God knows his company, right and left, would be well entitled to speak on that subject.

Deputy McGilligan also referred, rather scathingly I thought, to the President's broadcast on St. Patrick's Day. He seemed to see in it an effort to collect Party kudos. That was the way I read the Deputy's statement in any case. I may have read into it more than was intended, but when one listens in this House to a series of gibes from a man of the intellectual calibre of Deputy McGilligan, who should be above gibes, one naturally becomes a little suspicious. He seemed to read into the President's broadcast an effort to collect political kudos. I think that cannot be alleged against the President. No doubt he is not fool-proof any more than the Opposition, but I think it cannot be alleged against him that he would use St. Patrick's Day as an occasion, and the radio as a vehicle, to collect Party kudos. I am not an arbiter of taste; I have not had the advantage of a university education like Deputy McGilligan, but I say that possibly it would have been better to have left his Grace of Melbourne out of it. After all, the featuring of jail escapes over the radio is nothing unique or unusual. In what I might call, without meaning any offence, Deputy McGilligan's spiritual home, that great country across the Channel to which we were taught to look for inspiration in every crisis, jail escapes were frequently featured over the radio. Those things were glorified, and rightly so. Why should not we, with a past infinitely superior, a present equally superior, and a future of greater possiblities, rejoice not only in the escape of men from British jails but in the presentation of those escapes by men who actually took part in them? I fail to see why this should come in for Deputy McGilligan's censure. It was the only jarring note struck in the whole debate from yesterday until now. As I do not want to be taken as one who is constantly criticising—God knows I do not criticise very often—I should like to offer some substantive suggestions to the Minister with a view to their adoption. I may say here in advance that I am not a very ardent member of the ancient and honourable order of knob twiddlers. There are fans, as far as I can see, who persist in switching from China to Peru when you want to listen to Athlone. I find it extremely irritating and I do not mind admitting it. From the experience of some of those fans, I have gleaned a few suggestions and I should like to put them forward. One is to the effect that jazz could be completely eradicated from the programmes of Radio Athlone. It has been suggested to me, not unnaturally, that if we want jazz we can get it via England in the very best possible form. Those who wish to hear it could get it via England, and we might be mercifully spared the infliction of hearing Radio Athlone relaying it.

Can the Deputy define jazz?

It seems to me to be a cross between a waltz and all-in wrestling. It has been suggested to me that the Children's Hour could be made more attractive from a national and educational point of view. The children of to-day are getting rather sophisticated. Possibly, those children, and the "children of larger growth" who listen-in to the Children's Hour, might possibly benefit from a better national and educational programme. I think we should also have a little more ceilidhe music. It has been suggested also that we could have whole operas on records. There appears to be a public for that sort of thing. It has been done on the other side of the Channel. There are records made, I believe, of practically every opera from the overture to the close, with a short descriptive sketch as a prelude. Complaints have been made about a noise something like Big Bertha booming behind the transmission from Radio Athlone. I am not a technician in that respect, but it appears to be pretty widely understood that this booming persists at most inconvenient intervals. Possibly the Minister can explain the reason.

Lectures have been alluded to and I think a series of historical lectures could well be initiated and carried on to the educational advantage of the listeners-in and the country. I do not see, for instance, why we could not be taken in spirit to Clonmacnoise, by a lecturer who knew his stuff, and made familiar with the scenery around there, and made participators in the spirit of those who erected those glorious abbeys and monuments. I do not see why we should not be taken to Vinegar Hill, and made to live in the spirit of that district. It has been mentioned here that we ought to have a short-wave station for Ireland, whereby we could relay direct from Athlone, instead of being under an obligation to the courtesy of other stations for relaying to us. Possibly, those suggestions are enough for the harassed Minister, and if they have the effect of stirring his conscience into giving us a better programme than we have had I daresay they will not have been spoken in vain. It is unquestionable, indubitable, that the programmes have been immensely improved of late, and everyone concerned, from the Minister, the Director and the staff downwards, are to be heartily congratulated. We are all at one on that.

I wish to join in the tribute to the improvement which has been made in the broadcasting, and also to the development on the practical side of Irish life by the short talks of people with a knowledge of the various subjects. That is a development in the right direction. I got up to refer to just one or two matters in connection with broadcasting. Deputy Kehoe brought Deputy McGilligan to task for some references he made in his speech yesterday. I did not hear Deputy McGilligan's speech, neither did I read it, nor do I know that he spoke in the way attributed to him by Deputy Kehoe. On St. Patrick's Day I, in common with all old Gaelic footballers and hurlers now on the scrapheap, am interested in a good Gaelic football match or a good hurling match. We attend them when we can; when we cannot we listen-in. I was listening-in with others on St. Patrick's Day. Nobody would appreciate more than I would a talk on national matters, but in regard to the exchange of courtesies between the Head of this State and His Grace Archbishop Mannix I have no hesitation in saying that it was not national greetings but political greetings that were exchanged on that day. Personally, I would much prefer—and so would everybody who was in my company—to have listened-in to the interesting stage which the Ulster v. Connaught match had reached at the time, than to hear the President and Archbishop Mannix exchanging political greetings over the radio. His Grace, as he stated on that occasion, was 13,000 miles away, and we would welcome anything in the way of a national or religious talk from him, but personally I did not welcome his statements about the condition of Ireland, which in my opinion, were not and are not true. I do not say that he made a mis-statement, but I am quite sure that the words were put in his mouth and he said them, unfortunately. Why were not greetings exchanged between the President and His Grace the Archbishop on a very important matter that happened a few months ago—the President's attitude with regard to sanctions against Italy and His Grace's attitude towards those sanctions?

Following that interruption, there was a broadcast of perhaps the greatest classical hurling match of the year—the final between the provinces. The Munster and Leinster match was being broadcast. Everybody expected it would be a runaway victory for Munster, but they were beaten. At a critical moment, when the match was becoming interesting—and if a thing is worth doing at all it is worth doing well and completely—when a score had taken place and the announcer could not say exactly whether it was a score or not because the flag had not been raised, we were switched on to Athlone to hear three people talk about something which, I candidly confess, I was not interested in or anybody else who was listening in, and which we could have heard either before or after the match just as well as at that stage.

Those of us who have devoted the athletic years of our lives to the development of Gaelic pastimes should, apart from politics altogether, when a classic like that is being broadcast to Irishmen, or anybody else who wants to listen, see that it will not be interrupted. I, as an individual, protest against that interruption. I am sure the Minister will take full note of that. I do not know whether he will take note of the implication in Deputy Haslett's suggestion that church services should be broadcast in order to make it easy for us to follow them.

I am afraid I must strike a jarring note according to Deputy Kehoe. It has struck me for some time past that the broadcasting station is a place to enable the Government to pour forth their views—that it is really a propagandist institution. I am not blaming the Director for that. I expect he has to carry out the policy of the Minister. Most of the people engaged to give lectures or plays or anything of that sort would appear to me to have been practically all tarred with the Government brush —that nobody, except he is persona grata with the political Party in power, has got much opportunity for giving any services to the public as far as broadcasting is concerned.

Some time ago there was a play given there which had reference to a lady leaving Dublin who wishes to interview a gentleman in the country regarding a farm. She had the feeling that a 150-acre farm was what she required. Other people suggested that she should take a 50-acre farm. As the play went on, she interviewed a Government supporter on the way who had a 50-acre farm of which he had made a great success, having got £40 for beet, £20 for wheat, £55 for sheep, £30 for cattle, £52 for fruit, £40 for eggs and £35 for potatoes, making a total of £260 out of this 50-acre farm. At that particular time I consulted some people who had been engaged in fruit growing, and not even those of them who had very much larger farms than 50 acres had got even £20 for fruit during the year. That, while being a very interesting lecture or play or whatever the Minister might like to call it, was unquestionably propaganda for the Government agricultural policy.

I might say, in order to disabuse anybody who had any views in that respect, and who did not notice one sentence in it, that the outgoings amounted to £110, of which wages accounted for £65. That is approximately 25/- per week for wages. He got £40 for beet, £52 for fruit, £40 for eggs and £35 for potatoes for 25/- per week in wages. Going on to explain what he had to pay for annuities, he said: "God be good to the long fellow, he reduced the annuities by half." Fearing anyone might think that he was a Government supporter, he introduced this disrespectful observation with regard to the leader of the Government.

He wanted to sell the farm.

Yes. I am not satisfied from the various programmes which we have got that they are up to the standard of other countries. We pride ourselves upon our culture as exemplified in music, in lectures, or in finished performances of that kind. Our programmes certainly do not compare with programmes from other countries. If we switch on to Spain, Italy, Germany, CzechoSlovakia or Great Britain, each and all of them have one characteristic in common—there is a certain naturalness about them. Our broadcasting station, whether the Minister likes it or not, seems to strive after effect. Take, for example, the news. Various descriptions precede the news items such as: "What happened to-day." It is not necessary to say that. We all know what happened when we hear the news. The news item should be brief. It is not necessary to give descriptions beforehand as to the headings. We shall arrive at them when they come along. If we think our country is as important as others, we ought to get the home news first. There is no necessity for giving foreign items and particulars from the end of the earth and then, at long last, something that affects ourselves. If they are of importance at all, our local news items should be more interesting to us than those of other countries.

May I suggest to the Minister also that if we do take a pride in national institutions we ought to take pride in what is called our national anthem? It ought to be rendered on the one day in the year that we regard as our own day, the festival of our patron Saint on something else than a gramophone record. That record, goodness knows, ought to be nearly worn out. To anybody who has been accustomed to drill at any time, however imperfectly, it is obvious that one would have almost to jog to keep up with the speed at which it is played upon certain occasions. Whoever is responsible for striking off at the precise period carries on a note or two from the next bar or whatever description of music it is that should follow. Certainly on an occasion like that when we have first-class bands in this country, private bands throughout the city, and at least two State bands, those listening in to our station from other countries as well as our own people who are listening in here have a right to say that if the national anthem is to be played it should be played by something else besides a gramophone record.

The Minister has been congratulated on the programme that is presented and on the work of the director. I agree there has been an improvement, but whether the Minister or the director is responsible for it, it is an improvement at very considerable cost. I have here the Estimates for 1932-33 for broadcasting. The first item in that Estimate is:—Salaries, wages and allowances, £9,300. Let us look at the figure for this year and we find that salaries, wages and allowances amount to £15,700. That is a pretty considerable increase. Mind you, it has nothing to do with the performances. It may have to do with other matters, with things that make performances successful. The next item is the cost of the programmes. The figure down for 1932-33 is £14,700. The figure for the present year is £18,600. So that the cost of the programme has not gone up by quite £4,000 in the four years, whereas salaries, wages and allowances are up by £6,400. I think people are entitled to better value than that.

May I draw the Minister's attention to another feature of the broadcasting station. I do not know whether the Minister listens-in or not, or whether he listens to the Dublin or other stations. But it appears to me that Dublin has a poor wave length or whatever it may be called. There is another station on the wave length quite close to Dublin. Perhaps I might say there are three stations close to it. The first is Droitwich, which is very clear; the second is a German station, very clear too; and the third is an Italian station which has a very good reception. Whether it is the wave length machine or plant or whatever else is the cause, the defect ought to be looked into. The Minister has two or three wave lengths. If he had one good one he might be able to dispose of the other two at knock-down prices to someone else.

There is another important item to which I wish to draw attention. The Minister has a very valuable instrument, a piano, which cost a lot of money. I might mention that it does not appear to suit this studio. It has a tinny sound. It is a very good piano but it has this defect. Occasionally in the Continental stations one hears the same defect, but there are some stations from which very good piano sounds come. This instrument may be a very good one, but it does not suit. The Minister might see whether a change might not be effected and whether a piano costing a smaller sum might not suit better.

I questioned the Minister last year in connection with harp music. He then promised he would have more renderings of harp music. I did not hear any of them this year—I do not know about St. Patrick's Day. An item to which I want to refer is in connection with the reception of the voice of the lecturers. Whether it is that the distance that people are advised to stand from the microphone is not enough or whether it is that they stand too far away from the microphone I do not know, but one rarely hears a worse reception from British or Continental stations than one hears from the stations in this country. That may be a defect that could be rectified. On the question of lectures, stories or plays, there is a disposition on the part of people whether they wish it or not to exhibit the slave mind. I know that the Minister exercises some sort of censorship.

Mr. Boland

I will deal with that.

He exercises some censorship. People ought to have grown out of that during the last 12 or 14 years. It is not necessary. It does us no credit, and it can be easily eliminated certainly from that studio. There were some lectures given recently on the radio—I do not know whether it was from Droitwich or not. They were delivered within the last few months. They were a series of lectures by scientists. There were two which were of outstanding importance, and one of these referred to the Tennessee Valley Authority. The other was in respect of a new prison scheme in Soviet Russia. I cannot now remember the name of that scheme. In the case of the Tennessee Valley Authority, although it was highly scientific the lecture had a certain amount of historical value, and it apparently was given by a man who had made a most complete study of the whole affair. It was one of those matters that at the moment are the subject of court proceedings in America. But the scheme was gigantic, something completely out of the ordinary in so far as popular information was concerned. There may be some people who would say that a lecture like that was highbrow. It was nothing of the sort. It was a great scheme involving hydro-electric power and involving information and inquiry into the rainfall for a period of 1,000 years. There was also instruction as to how it was possible to get that information. There was information about the endeavour to stop the rolling off of the soil which had been going on through flooding. The scheme was one of general importance, and it was much more than merely dealing with unemployment. I do not know whether it would be possible for the Minister to provide lectures such as these in our broadcasting station. I support the views that have been expressed by Deputy Dillon, by saying that we have enough politics without having them introduced into the broadcasting station. The Minister would be well advised to clear out of the station the politics that have come into it.

I want to say a few words in support of what Deputy Cosgrave has said in connection with the National Anthem. I referred to this last year. The National Anthem which was being played then, so far as I could understand, was an American interpretation of the National Anthem. That was what we were getting at that time through the medium of the radio. After that complaint of mine was made, that record was not played for a considerable time, and we had a rendering by the No. 1 Army Band under Colonel Brasé. That was an immense improvement, but the one that is being played now is an absolute disgrace. It is the Irish National Anthem played in best jazz time. I would prefer not to hear that rendering of the National Anthem. I do agree that the Station Orchestra ought to play the National Anthem, or we might have some record by an Irish band, so as to get a really Irish interpretation of it.

I would like to support what Deputy Dillon has said about the radio artistes who do not live in the vicinity of Dublin. As in everything else, Dublin has a monopoly in radio engagements. There are artistes all over the country just as good as there are in Dublin, and they do not get a chance because they are handicapped. Dublin artistes get a fee for appearing, and they have not to pay any expenses out of it. The consequence is that various people who are living in the provinces have refused or they have not made an effort to get in touch with the broadcasting station because of the question of the expense incurred in travelling to Dublin. There is another matter, and that is the question of the breakdown or interruption of the programme. On some occasions we have a breakdown or an interruption in Athlone. After two or three minutes the station comes on again, but nobody says there has been a breakdown, and nobody makes anything like an apology. In the case of breakdowns in other stations, an explanation is given when they are made right again. That never happens in the case of Athlone, and nobody knows what really happens.

I agree with what has been said about the improvement in Radio Athlone. Certainly the news feature now is infinitely better than it was before Dr. Kiernan took up control. I think, as a matter of fact, that the 6.45 news feature is far better than the English feature at 6 o'clock. I have no hesitation in saying that. In Wexford it is absolutely impossible to get Athlone for one of the four or five hours it is working at night. I do not know whether that will be improved in the near future by reason of the fact that the Minister is going to increase the power of the station. I do not know where the fault is, but I think the complaint is general so far as the Wexford area is concerned. I hope that the increased power will have the effect of providing better reception in the Wexford area.

There is just one point to which I wish to draw attention. There are through the country a big number of wireless sets which are not being used. They have neither connections nor batteries, but the Minister insists on collecting a licence fee in respect of them. Some of those sets are made of polished timber and they form attractive pieces of furniture in a room, but whether aerials, batteries, or any of the working parts are missing, the Minister insists on the licence fee being paid. I think he should be satisfied when there is a guarantee given that the set has not been working for a year or two and that some of the parts are missing, and should not insist on collecting the fee. I know of cases where it has been stated that if you have any one part of a set in your house you must pay the fee, and I think that should not be the case. Some of these sets are nicely built, and, although old-fashioned and out of date, they are pieces of furniture and I think it is a hardship that people should be compelled to throw these sets out as scrap or pay the licence fee. That is the one matter I want to raise, and I hope the Minister will do something about it.

On the question of censorship, I want to get clear as to the Minister's responsibility. The Minister, I am sure, will not tell us that there is no censorship over the matter given in lectures or discourses of one kind or another on the radio.

Mr. Boland

Would the Deputy like me to answer that now? Deputy McGilligan last night insinuated certain things——

I should like to make my point first.

Mr. Boland

Very well; I should prefer that too.

I should like to know where responsibility lies— whether with the Minister or with an official of the broadcasting station.

Mr. Boland

Responsibility?

Responsibility for doing the actual censoring, because if the responsibility lies with an official of the broadcasting office, I think his terms of reference should be amended in some way. Exception has been taken to some of the things dealt with by the President in his St. Patrick's Day performance. The suggestion is that these statements were Party statements. I take exception to three or four points in his broadcast, not because what he said was pro his own Party, or because what he said was likely to be injurious to any other Party in this country, but because his statements were contrary to what I think are the best interests of international relations.

I had a short time ago to protest against the President on a previous occasion inviting the United States Government to squeeze Great Britain as hard as they could in connection with war debts. His broadcast to the United States on St. Patrick's Day practically invited that again. I object to that for two reasons. Firstly, there is a war debt problem. The present Government may, or may not, have a policy in connection with it. If they have a policy in connection with it, we ought to know it, and he ought not, in a casual and disruptive kind of way, deal with a problem, which is a world problem gravely affecting international political and economic relations, by a national broadcast on the national festival and indicate to the world that this country is against a sensible and realistic settlement of that particular problem.

Secondly, it is an interference in the name of a race that is, at any rate, supposed to have a very great influence among a large section of the citizens of the United States. It is an entry into internal United States politics. Various statements by highly-placed and responsible American officials and politicians have recently indicated that they have a progressive and mellowing attitude with regard to the settlement of the world war debt problem. There are sections of people in America who do not want anything but a rigid pound for pound settlement of these debts, irrespective entirely of the effect the presence of this problem has on international political and economic relations. It is throwing in an unwarranted way the weight of the influence, as it were, of the Irish nation, in so far as the President in a national broadcast on the national festival can do it, on one side of what may be, and no doubt is, an internal political question in the United States.

The third point to which I object in his statement is his suggestion to European nations that the people of this country could help them in settling their present-day problems. If the President and members of the Government have any conception at all of the spirit that is troubling the various nations in Europe, and of the difficulties that confront them, both externally and amongst themselves, it is a disgraceful thing to suggest to them that they are going to save themselves by anything but the evangelising which they can do on one another or by their own efforts; it is a disgraceful thing to suggest that they can rely on the people of Ireland in any way to help them in their difficulties, because we are doing nothing but creating for ourselves with our eyes open all the disruptions and all the disturbances which the European people have created for themselves in the past. Politically, we are going to have as many Parties in the country before long as there are Parties represented in the French Chamber of Deputies.

Is the Deputy anticipating another split?

I am talking seriously about what is a fact. We are busily pursuing policies in this country to create another Alsace-Lorraine, as if we had not experience enough of what it means to more than one country in Europe to have that position created. I think whoever is responsible for carrying out whatever censorship is carried out ought to have some additional instructions, and I should like to ask whether the President's broadcast on St. Patrick's Day was examined by this official censor or not.

Deputy Kehoe addressed himself to some of the remarks that Deputy McGilligan had to make last night on some of the historical broadcasts. I do not wish to comment in any way on them, but I do want to remark that it is a surprising thing that when the Minister for Finance has to stand up here in this House, recalling certain circumstances, to declare that Deputy Cosgrave did establish majority rule in this country, we should be having broadcasts of the escape of people who were in arms against this House. I think there are quite sufficient historical episodes to broadcast without going into the 1922 period to attempt to glorify, to use a word that the Deputy used, episodes of that particular kind. I am quite sure that we are not going to have a broadcast from the Minister for Finance on his attempt to rescue prisoners from Mountjoy Jail and if we are not going to hear the Minister for Finance on an important historical subject like that, I do not think that there is anybody else in the country we ought to hear. The veil could be quite easily drawn over these gallant episodes for another period.

A Deputy

It would want to be drawn over other things too.

Before the Minister concludes, I do not want to allow to go entirely unchallenged the statement of Deputy Dillon that political issues should be rigorously excluded from broadcasting. It does not appear to me that that is a reasonable statement to make. We want the people of this country to think about political issues, as apart from merely always acting on strictly Party lines or under the influence of strong personal emotions or prepossessions. One of the best ways of getting people to think if they have got radios in their houses is to have calm, concise discussions on specific issues over the radio. Deputy Cosgrave and Deputy Dillon said that people do not want such discussions. I do not know on what they based that statement. I believe that in this matter as in other matters affecting the choice of programmes the Director of Broadcasting can use his own judgment as to what would prove interesting and popular and what would not. What really matters is not that political issues should be completely excluded, but that when they are presented they should be presented with fairness to all shades of opinion.

I think as a matter of fact that apart from the interest of such discussions to listeners, they would be of considerable value to politicians because talking over the radio is a very useful discipline for a politician. Clap-trap and personalities do not come at all well over the radio. If you are going to make a favourable impression over the radio you have got to do your best to talk sense, to talk calmly, persuasively, and in an objective manner, about the issue you are discussing. I do not want at all to urge that an undue quantity of political matter should be introduced into our radio programmes, but on the other hand, I would ask that the Minister should not fall in with the suggestion of Deputy Dillon that domestic political issues should be rigorously excluded, except at the time of a general election. I think that when issues of special interest are shortly to be dealt with by the Parliament of the country, it would be valuable to have such issues placed before the people by means of the radio, by speakers who are competent so to place them.

Perhaps the Minister would allow me to address one query to him which I forgot when I spoke previously. I should like to know if it is proposed to continue the feature known as "Newcomers' Hour." I think it is the most appalling form of entertainment we have in the whole programme. If it is proposed to continue this feature, I should like to know whether the Minister or those responsible will take steps to see that the people who come before the microphone during the Newcomers' Hour will be called upon to pass some test before they are allowed to inflict themselves on people who are listening-in, in the country. I think anybody who has listened on many occasions to this feature of the Newcomers' Hour will agree with me that it is a most appalling performance. I have heard superior performances at fairs up and down the country.

I had no intention of joining in the well-merited praise extended to the Minister and his Depart ment in connection with wireless broadcasting, but having heard the statement, just made by Deputy Morrisey I feel obliged to rise to ask the Minister not to accede to the request put forward by Deputy Morrissey. I think the introduction of the Newcomers' Hour has been of great good and has been a great boon. While some of the talent that appeared may not meet with the approval of Deputy Morrissey, I believe that a good deal of new talent has been discovered in the country as a result of this feature. After all the public is the best judge in the long run, and in order to get the public to judge, this Newcomers' Hour in itself provides a good test. I hope the Minister will not at all accede to Deputy Morrissey's request to have that Newcomers' Hour taken away. I am surprised that Deputy Morrissey, with his background, should suggest that this innovation is not a good one, because, after all, there are many poor persons all over the country who would never get an opportunity of exhibiting whatever talent they possess if it were not for the Newcomers' Hour. Whatever hopes they might have for the future, or whatever talent they might possess which would require development, they would never get a chance if it were not for a feature of this kind. I hope that the Minister will very definitely tell Deputy Morrissey that this feature will not be discontinued.

What the Deputy said is a complete misrepresentation of what I stated. I asked that if the feature were going to be continued, there should be some preliminary test before performers are allowed to go to the microphone. If it were possible, I should like to have a pair of earphones affixed to Deputy Briscoe's ears every time this feature was being broadcast for the last twelve months. Any person in this country who has talent, no matter how poor he may be, will I am sure be given every opportunity by the broadcasting authorities, but surely, in order to discover one person who has talent or who is a fairly good singer, we ought not to be asked to give up an hour of our very short broadcasting programme to try-cut fourteen or fifteen of the most appalling performers it is possible to hear.

The one hour I do listen to is Newcomers' Hour. My whole family join in listening to that feature and enjoy it.

My opinion as to what constitutes talent is different from that of the Deputy.

I believe that, just as there is always a difference of opinion amongst various people as to things that are beautiful and persons that are beautiful, there is also a difference of opinion as to the things that are musical and the things that are not.

Very obviously.

I do not know that Deputy Morrissey can say that these people are not tested before they are brought to the microphone. I would not like to hazard the suggestion that they are not. I have sufficient confidence in the directors of the broadcasting studio to believe that they do not take every Tom, Dick and Harry who come along and say to them: "Go up and do your turn." I believe there must be some means of sifting out the few that turn up every week.

Having taken notice of the remarks of Deputy MacDermot that clap-trap and abuse should be eliminated over the wireless, could the Minister arrange to have an instrument affixed here which would convey the speeches to the public outside?

To start where we left off, Deputy Morrissey asked about the "Newcomers' Hour." We have had proof here that there is a difference of opinion about that item. The whole difficulty about broadcasting is that there is no way of getting an opinion you could rely upon about anything save by having a plebiscite of listeners. I agree that a good part of the "Newcomers' Hour" is not up to a high standard, but I think that the idea behind it is excellent. There is some sifting done. I understand that all sorts of aspirants come along. I may be saying something which I should not say when I tell the House that only about 20 per cent. of those who offer are accepted. That may speak badly for the musical talent of the country. We are satisfied, however, that we have some very good singers and, as this experiment continues, there will, I hope, be a certain rivalry between different districts, resulting in the elevation of the musical standard of the country. This feature was not introduced on my initiative. The director was responsible for introducing it and I approve of it. I think it is a good feature.

Deputy MacDermot does not agree with Deputy Cosgrave or Deputy Dillon on the question of the broadcasting of political debates. I agree with Deputy MacDermot. As he pointed out, the resulting discipline would be very useful. I should have no objection, personally, if a political debate could be arranged, from time to time, between accredited speakers of different Parties. I think it would lead to a much higher standard of political controversy than we have. If we had a microphone here and if people who are prone to forget themselves in debate knew that what they were saying was being transmitted to the people outside, we might have a higher tone introduced into our discussions.

Get them into the "Newcomers' Hour."

Mr. Boland

Deputy Mulcahy wanted to know where the responsibility for censorship lies. I am responsible for everything that happens at the broadcasting station but I have never interfered with the actual censorship. As regards the remarks of Deputy McGilligan, I was going to say that I was sorry that he was not here but I shall not say that because, in his absence, there has been a different tone in the debate. The members of the Opposition have made their case in a very fair way. I should be very disappointed if nothing resulted from this debate but a lot of praise. I myself am not perfectly satisfied with the station. I admit that there is room for improvement and the Director realises that, too. Deputy McGilligan started off by saying that he was not quite sure whether what he was going to say happened but all the same he insinuated that it did happen. He suggested that the script of a person who intended to broadcast was changed on occasion and that when he came before the microphone it even happened that it was blacked out. I have made inquiries since and I have found that that has never happened. Only on one occasion in recent times has any person objected to reading a paper because of censorship. On that occasion, the censorship was at the instance of an official who insisted on the deletion of what he considered a rather offensive expression—an expression that ought not to be broadcast. The person who proposed to give the lecture thought otherwise and, as he was not prepared to change the script, he had to walk out. When on inquiry this morning I heard the particular word to which exception was taken, I agreed that the official was perfectly right in not allowing it to be broadcast. I have never attempted to interfere in the censorship at the station.

As regards the point about the President's broadcast, no official in the Government service would have the right to censor what the head of the State would propose to broadcast. I think that it would be impertinent to suggest that any official should have the right to censor the address to be delivered by the President. I do not agree with the interpretation placed by Deputy Mulcahy on the broadcast which the President thought fit to make on St. Patrick's Day. I think it was quite a dignified statement, setting out the developments during the year. I listened-in and was very pleased with the broadcast, as I think anybody who had the interest of this country at heart would be. Deputy Belton made a frivolous complaint about the interruption of a hurling broadcast for the purpose of hearing Dr. Mannix. I am as much interested in hurling as Deputy Belton is. I played as many matches as he ever did and I was listening-in to the broadcast of the match in question. I enjoyed the broadcast very well and I was anxious to hear the end of it and did hear it. I had, however, no objection to the interruption. I thought that Dr. Mannix's address was a perfectly proper one and the reception was perfect. On that question, Deputy Belton spoke for himself and a few people who were in the room with him but I think the vast majority of the people of the country would agree with me, that what was said was what ought to be said on an occasion like that.

Deputy McGilligan said last night, referring to the winning of first prize at the Show by Deputy Cosgrave's bull, that he could not conceive of such an item being suppressed. Somehow or other, he did conceive it, although nobody else conceived it. I heard that item of news broadcast and I was delighted to hear that an animal owned by the ex-President should have commanded such a high price during the economic war. In dealing with Deputy McGilligan, I must try to be charitable because I do not think he can help himself—I do not think that it is his fault. Some people have remarked that they thought he was born that way but I think that would be in the nature of blasphemy. I think that the nurse put some vinegar in his milk when he was a baby and that he has been generating venom ever since. If he did not emit some of it now and again, he would collapse completely. I hope that some of these explosions will do him good physically.

The Minister is plagiarising Senator Connolly.

Mr. Boland

Deputy McGilligan assured everybody that this item was not broadcast. Perhaps I had better read the broadcast: "The Champion Silver Medal for the best bull of the Shorthorn breed at to-day's Royal Dublin Society's Show at Ballsbridge, as well as the Phænix Challenge Cup for the best bull bred by an exhibitor in Ireland, was won by Mr. W. T. Cosgrave, T.D."

What was the time of that broadcast?

Mr. Boland

It was the first item about the Bull Show.

Mr. Boland

Does it matter what the time was? It was the first item that was broadcast. There was no more in that suggestion of Deputy McGilligan than there was in his other suggestion that I instructed the Station Director, whom he started off by praising, to censor people's opinions and black out their statements before the microphone. I should like to remind the House that the present Director of Broadcasting holds a very responsible position in the Civil Service and was only seconded to our Department. If the Minister were to deal with him in that way, I am sure he would not remain in the office another day. I had better pass from that. You know why the thing happened now; the man cannot help it.

With reference to Deputy Holohan's statement, it is laid down in the Wireless Telegraphy Act that all sets must be licensed. How are we to know that they are not being used when the collector is not knocking about? As to the National Anthem, there is a division of opinion even in my own house on that. I do not like it, but I am not an authority on the question. I am assured that a new rendering is to be produced soon, when I hope Deputies and others will be satisfied. Another point raised by Deputy Corish was in connection with the fees paid to country people coming to broadcast. I do not agree with what was said. As is well known we have, in order to cater for artistes from the country, arranged regional broadcasts which is a new development and as far as I know the first of its kind in any country. We are bringing the radio to the people in the country. Voluntary committees have been set up in different parts. I understand that Wexford has broadcast twice, and that Roscommon will be on the air to-night. It is a very good feature, and I am sure that people in charge of choral and dramatic societies are a better authority than individuals who consider that so-and-so is not a good singer. The societies will not be prepared to ask people to take part in a programme unless they feel that they will do credit to a particular district. In that way I think the point made by Deputy Dillon is very well met. As far as we can we will have regional broadcasts, and every facility will be given to bring forward native talent. We may not get a very high standard in the beginning, but I am perfectly certain that as the service grow we will develop a very high standard of Irish music. Dublin has not a monopoly. I do not think we would be justified in paying the travelling expenses of people from the country who desire to broadcast or who ask for a date. The Director tries to fit in a date with a time when these people may have business in Dublin. He tries to facilitate them in that way. I do not think we would be justified in giving extra fees for a performance that might be worse than we could get from other people.

When breaksdown occur occasionally I think there is generally an apology. If not, there ought to be. I have often heard apologies broadcast when a breakdown occurs. Breaksdown are due to small technical faults, and as long as the wires are overhead they are inevitable. I believe that Wexford has not good reception on occasions, but when the wave-length is increased to 100 kilowats the reception will be more satisfactory.

Deputy Cosgrave had a good deal to say about bad lectures and good lectures. There you are again. We will have to differ about these things. My own opinion is that there are good lectures and bad lectures. The one that I might consider to be a bad lecture, Deputy Mulcahy might consider a good one. There is one thing we will have to agree upon—and I said it in this House on two or three occasions—and that is that no station in the world will suit everyone all the time. If a person were to sit down at night and to listen-in for four hours to our station, and for the same length of time the next night to the B.B.C. or some other stations, I guarantee he would be fed up. If people want to enjoy the radio my advice to them is to select the programmes they want to hear. I do not know anything about the "tinny" piano that was referred to. Deputy Cosgrave says it is a valuable one but that it has a tinny sound now. The Broadcasting Director will look after that matter, as it may want tuning. I do not know how often the harp is played from the studio—too often, perhaps, for my taste. A sum of £6,000 is put down as salaries for the station orchestra. Up to 1932 the members were not on a permanent basis, so that when that £6,000 is included in the Estimate it accounts for the big difference in the figures. Previously, the orchestra was not on a permanent basis. I do not know if Deputy Cosgrave objected, but he complained that we were spending more than in 1932. Perhaps I am taking him up wrong. I think the general complaint is that we are not spending enough.

Hear, hear.

Mr. Boland

That seems to be the general complaint. On that I can say definitely that the new Director was told that within reasonable limits any requirements would be met. I asked him about this and he is satisfied that he is not hampered for want of money. I can tell the House that he will not be hampered within reasonable limits. Within the year it was not possible to have a very big extension such as was planned, but I hope next year we will have a big improvement.

Where used that £6,000 for the station orchestra appear before?

Mr. Boland

It would appear under "programmes." I think it was called the station sextet. That was before we got the permanent orchestra. Deputy Cosgrave said that the programmes were not up to world standard. I do not agree with the Deputy. I think, on the whole, our station is as good as stations in other countries. The test is to listen-in for three or four hours. It will be found that what pleases some people will not please others.

It has been said that the Government aired their views on the radio. In my opinion the Government has not taken sufficient advantage of the broadcasting station to try to put across legislation concerning the agricultural and the economic policy which has passed into law. Once that has happened these things are above Party. We are certainly trying to encourage wheat growing and beet growing. My complaint is that Ministers have not availed of the broadcasting station sufficiently to impress upon the people the necessity of giving effect to the legislation that has been passed and of co-operating with the Government in that legislation. I have no apologies to make there. I complain of their carelessness in not availing of broadcasting. I think the Minister for Agriculture had practically to be dragged to the station, and also the Minister for Lands. Why should we not ask Ministers to broadcast on what is the law of the country? There is no Party politics about that. We have certainly not put anything of a Party nature on the air. After the Budget was introduced last year Deputy McGilligan, Deputy Good and others were asked to give their views on it, and no attempt was made by anyone to interfere with what they had to say. I remember one of the first interviews I had with the new director, at which he mentioned certain names of very prominent political opponents of the Government whom, he said, he proposed to ask to broadcast occasionally. When he asked me if I had any objection I said I certainly had not.

Deputy Cosgrave said that unless people were tarred with the brush of the political Party in power they rarely got a chance to broadcast. Well, of course, all the most intelligent people are on our side and I suppose that explains it. I can tell the House that, as long as I have responsibility, there will be no attempt to restrict the choice of speakers. The only censorship that has been attempted at the station is the kind of censorship that I have already mentioned. Deputy Belton said that nobody was interested in Archbishop Mannix's statement. Did anyone ever hear such cheek? I suppose the Deputy and the few fellows he had in the room with him listening-in were not interested, but certainly his statement does not apply to the vast majority of the people of the country.

Deputy Kehoe asked me to eliminate jazz. I confess I would like to do it if I could because I do not like it. I have received some complaints about it, but I think that on the whole there is not so much jazz broadcast now. Deputy MacDermot wanted to know what jazz is. Deputy Kehoe gave him a definition, but I do not know whether it is a correct one or not. As I have said, I do not like jazz and I would like to see it eliminated altogether, but I am afraid we will not be able to do that. Deputy Kehoe also said that we should introduce an improvement in the Children's Hour. We are going ahead in that direction and we are having broadcasts to the schools. Of course, we are only at the beginning so far as that is concerned, but we hope to extend these weekly broadcasts and are doing all we can in that direction. The Deputy referred to the question of lectures from places of historic interest, such as Clonmacnoise and Vinegar Hill. That suggestion will be considered. If it is possible to lay lines to these places, we hope to be able to arrange for suitable lectures from them.

Some very good lectures have been given from the station. Some of them were mentioned in my opening statement and referred to as "great moments in Irish history." Deputy McGilligan who asked a question on this knew very well that these did not refer to the prison escapes. They were lectures on the coming of St. Patrick, the 1916 Rising, which is of real historic interest, and to other events. Speaking for myself, I may say that I was not too pleased with the broadcasts dealing with the prison escapes. What I felt was that the veil might well have been drawn over them. I was not consulted about them, although, of course, I am responsible for everything that is broadcast. I may say, however, that if my advice had been asked before the broadcasts were given, I would have said that a lot of these things might well be left unsaid until we are all dead, and then let others, if they think it well to do so, talk about them.

Deputy Moore asked if it would be possible to have a journal published in connection with the broadcasting service. There is a good deal, of course, involved in that. I would like to have a journal if it were possible to have one. First of all, it might involve us in very heavy cost, and all that I can do at the moment is to promise that the matter will be considered. If I am able to get round my colleague the Minister for Finance I will see what we can do. At any rate, I promise that the suggestion will be examined into.

Deputy Dillon referred to the question of the establishment of a philharmonic orchestra. That whole question is being considered, and I hope that it may be possible to do something along the lines suggested. With regard to his point about getting the people who appear at the celebrity concerts to broadcast, I understand that they are under contract not to broadcast when they come here. I can assure him that whenever the opportunity presents itself of engaging famous people to broadcast, we will do our best to get them. Deputy Dillon also said that the views of people of distinction no matter how radical, should be ventilated in public. That is a rather controversial matter to deal with. I do not think the Deputy or anybody would absolve me from complete responsibility if I gave people a free rein to say what they liked over the ether. I am responsible for what is broadcast, and what the Deputy has suggested might be a rather dangerous thing to do. I cannot say that I agree with him. I might think it a desirable thing to do if I did not happen to be the Minister, but while I am Minister if any unfortunate incident occurred I can anticipate the bombardment that I would get from all sides. In my official capacity I hesitate to say that I am prepared to agree with him. Deputy Morrissey complained about the programmes, and said the reason they were not better was because the station was being starved for want of money. That is not so at all.

What is the explanation?

Mr. Boland

Practically everyone admits that there has been an improvement in the programmes. The station, I admit, is not as perfect as it might be. There is always room for improvement whether you are thinking of a broadcasting station or anything else. If things are not as good as they might be it is not due to the want of money. I have not heard many complaints about the programmes. On the whole Deputies seem to be well pleased with them. It has to be remembered that we are only a year working under the new conditions. If the Director puts up proposals for an extension of the programme or for a better programme, they will not be rejected for want of money. I do not admit that the station is anything at all as bad as the Deputy wanted to imply in his statement.

I did not suggest that the station was bad.

Mr. Boland

Well, then, what is wrong? The Deputy also asked for longer programmes on Sundays. I agree with him about that. He asked what was the result of the appeal that was made to listeners about the Sunday programme, whether they would like to have the programme of gramophone music broadcast from 3 to 5 or from 1 to 3 p.m. I may tell him that very little interest was taken in that appeal although we have 85,000 licence holders. About 300 voted for 3 to 5 p.m., and these were mostly from the rural areas, and 200 voted for 1 to 3 p.m., most of the voters being from the cities.

Would the Minister say what is going to be the position with regard to the Cork station, and has he any information with regard to the proposal to set up a broadcasting station in Galway?

I want to put a technical question to the Minister. Can he say whether the station has received complaints of a recurrent hum in the diffusion from Athlone? It is not heard in any Continental station, or in any English station, but it is very marked on occasions in the Athlone station. People find that when reception is very good from Athlone, it is often very much disfigured by this recurrent hum which distorts the programme, and is, apparently, due to some defect in the broadcasting apparatus. I am interested to know if the Minister has received complaints from any other centre from that in which I happen to live and listen in?

I would like to say that I asked the Minister the same question, and from the point of view of courtesy I would like to tell Deputy Dillon that I have an option on that hum.

Mr. Boland

As Deputy Kehoe has just said, he raised that question when speaking. It was one of the things that I forgot to deal with when replying. I am informed that this is probably due to interference from other stations, due to over-crowding. That is our information. We have technical people examining this question. A shake of the head from the Deputy is not going to settle it. I am making that statement on advice— that this hum is due to over-crowding. Other stations are also subject to this interference. The Deputy may shake his head, but I am prepared to accept advice from people who are in a better position to know than Deputy Dillon or myself.

As regards the short-wave suggestion, I believe it would be a very heavy cost and it is not necessary for national broadcasting; possibly for international broadcasting it would be. The way I feel about the matter is that when we reach the high pitch which I expect we will reach very shortly, then I shall become very enthusiastic about getting a high-power station. I quite admit we are doing well, but, as Deputy Haslett says, there are other heights to conquer. I quite agree, and I expect when we have them conquered there will be still others. When we get to the stage of perfection that everyone will know it must be Ireland that is on the air, then perhaps we will become very keen on getting a short-wave station, but we can do without it until then.

I cordially appreciate the frank manner in which the Minister has answered various questions, but he must not rebuke me for shaking my head, because Deputy Kehoe was also shaking his head with equal vigour behind him. May I suggest that while his experts may give him expert opinion on how to work the wireless station, Deputy Kehoe and I can give him a very much better opinion as to what comes out of the receiving set? That there is a hum of this character from Athlone is certain, and that the same kind of hum does not come from Continental or English stations is equally certain. That may be due to the idiosyncrasies of the Counties Wexford and Mayo, but that that does exist is unquestionably true. Does such a complaint come from other counties, and, if so, would it not be well to get some external expert to come and examine the problem and indicate whether he confirms the view expressed by the Irish experts, that it is due to overcrowding, or perhaps throw some new light on the question?

Mr. Boland

I can assure Deputy Dillon that, without raising the question at all here, that matter has been constantly under review. The Minister for Finance says that he has heard that type of interference after the Athlone Station has closed down.

Which shows that it is coming from another station, and it has nothing to do with Athlone.

Mr. Boland

The Deputy may rest assured that the matter will be looked into and every possible step will be taken to remedy it.

Now that the Minister has assured us that there is no shortage of money, within reason, perhaps he will see that we have a better Sunday programme?

Mr. Boland

I will see that you get a better Sunday programme.

Motion—"That the Estimate be referred back for reconsideration"—by leave, withdrawn.
Vote 64 put and agreed to.
Barr
Roinn