Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Thursday, 22 May 1958

Vol. 168 No. 5

Committee on Finance. - Garda Síochána Bill, 1958—Second Stage.

I move that the Bill be now read a Second Time. This Bill, which proposes to authorise the recruitment of women Gardaí, will, I think, commend itself to all sides of the House. Initially, only 12 women will be recruited and they will be assigned to the Dublin Metropolitan Division and later, if the experiment is successful—as I am confident it will—to the county boroughs of Cork, Limerick and Waterford. At present four women are employed as police assistants in Dublin but they are not members of the Garda Síochána and have no special powers of arrest or authority to take statements.

It will be generally agreed that there are many police duties, mainly in connection with matters affecting children and young women, where it is desirable that policewomen should be employed. I do not say that male Gardaí have not handled such difficult matters successfully and tactfully, with the assistance, in Dublin, of the women police assistants, but in recent years the trend in other countries has been to place women on these duties as much as possible and this trend is in accordance with humanitarian principles. It is the intention that women police will be concerned, primarily, with these matters but they will be given general police training and may be required to do any police duties which women would be capable of performing.

Preliminary arrangements are being made by the Civil Service Commissioners for holding the entrance examination for women recruits. I expect that the examination will take place in the autumn. There will be a qualifying written examination in educational subjects (including Irish) but the final placings of the successful candidates will be determined by the Commissioners solely on the results of an interview at which the personal qualifications of the candidates and any special qualifications will be taken into account. The successful candidates will be required to pass an oral Irish test before appointment. Entrants will have to be at least 5 feet 6 inches in height and to be between the ages of 20 and 25 years. Women Gardai will be obliged to retire on marriage in which event they will receive a gratuity on the same basis as women civil servants. Their pension rights will be more favourable than their male colleagues in that they may retire after 25 years' service without age qualification, whereas men may retire only after they have completed 30 years' service and have reached the age of 50. The pay of women Gardai will range from a minimum of £5 5s. on appointment to £8 7s. 6d. at the maximum of the scale.

I believe that the admission of women to the police force will be in the interest both of the public and of good police administration. Accordingly, I commend the Bill to the House and ask that it be given a Second Reading.

I want to record that I went to Ballingeary as a boy and I went to Gortahork because I loved the language and wanted to learn it for its own sake, that all belonging to me were of the same mind and that we were enrolled in the Gaelic League when we were infants by our parents. But, against that background, I want to express my loathing and contempt for the proposition to Dáil Éireann that you cannot get a competent woman police constable without submitting her to an oral test in Irish.

Can you imagine a police woman patrolling Meath Street, Marlboro' Street or Summerhill being challenged in Irish or being required to discharge her duties through "the medium"? That is the kind of cod that makes those who love Irish shrivel with shame that we have reached such a stage of fraud and codology in this country that even in a simple, good Bill of this kind we have to prostitute common sense to that kind of grotesque fraud, and the evil of it is that in the choice of these women for these most desirable and necessary services some most excellent candidate may be rejected and an inferior candidate preferred before her, because she masquerades as having a competent knowledge of Irish.

How the Minister, who has an intimate knowledge of the conditions in that part of Dublin where I was born and reared and where, I think, he was born and reared himself, could some in and say that for the purpose of discharging a police woman's duty in Ballybough, Summerhill or Mountjoy Square, a competent knowledge of Irish is necessary, surprises me. It is not like the Minister to engage in cod of that kind and I am amazed that he has allowed himself to be manoeuvred into the absurdity of presenting that ridiculous addendum to this Bill.

I agree with the Minister that the Bill in its purpose will commend itself to all sides of the House. I am a little uneasy about the scale of pay. I do not know whether the scale of pay provides for any additional amenities over and above the five guineas referred to. I do not think you will get, or can hope to get, the kind of people we would like to get for this delicate and most important duty at this scale of pay. Nothing is more important than that, in making this new departure here, which is so well established and justified by experience in London, New York and other great cities of the world, we should get the right women to inaugurate the service, which I cannot doubt will grow, but if it is to grow the first entrants ought to be the best, so that we can build upon the foundation laid by them.

Although we may assume that some of the original entrants will regard this service, partially at least, in the line of a vocation, I do not think it is right to trade on that fact, and I do not think it is right to offer a lower rate of pay than would otherwise be requisite because we believe there will be forthcoming a number of women who are prepared to accept the relatively low rate of pay because they love the work and believe it is something in respect of which they can serve. Perhaps the Minister would tell me whether the five guineas comprises their entire compensation, or are there any other perquisites?

Perhaps it would be better if I answered that point when replying?

Of course, they have uniforms, but I do not assume there will be any provision for their living in, as there are for members of the Garda Síochána, because that could not be conveniently arranged. Therefore, five guineas seems to me to be a very low figure and the Minister should, I think, reconsider that.

The only other matter to which I want to refer is the fact that these women police will have a very large part of their duty in dealing with children, and I think it right to ask the Minister if, when he is making this provision, he will not concern himself to go this extra step forward. If children are taken into his custody, will he not take more interest of a practical kind in how these children are dealt with when they are in his custody? I am well aware that the traditional reply to that is that Marlborough House is under the control of the Minister for Education and the Minister for Justice has nothing to do with it and, therefore, on the Estimate for the Department of Justice one is headed off. But this is a Bill designed for the better protection of children requiring custody or intervention on the part of the State. I want to put it to the House that it is not enough to provide women police to protect children from criminal interference by others or to apprehend children engaged in what we will call "juvenile misdemeanours". We have also the very solemn responsibility that, if we take these children into the custody of the State, we ought to be certain that we do for them the best that it is humanly possible to do.

Under the existing system children, who may become subject to apprehension by women police in the future, are removed to Marlborough House and there may rest for anything from a week to a month. They go there for every sort of reason, from vagrancy to transit from one industrial school to another, and at ages ranging from five years up. Not infrequently you may find a child of five spending a week, a fortnight, or a month in Marlborough House in intimate association with children of fourteen and fifteen who have been apprehended for misdemeanours and aberrations of the most extreme and difficult kind.

I do not believe there is any adequate provision for segregation in that establishment and I have repeatedly asked the Minister does he think it right to take children of tender years into custody and to seek to have them disposed of by a court of law unless he is in a position to put before the court, for its guidance and information, a report from a competent child psychiatrist as to what the true psychiatric condition of the child is and in how far that is due to conditions in the child's home, or in the child's surroundings, or in the company habitually kept by the child?

It does not seem that all this comes within the scope of the Bill.

The Bill is designed to provide for a women's police force, recruited mainly to deal with children.

The Deputy is talking about the care of children and their control, otherwise than when they are in custody.

The Minister said:—

"It will be generally agreed that there are many police duties, mainly in connection with matters affecting children and young women, where it is desirable that policewomen should be employed."

That would be children wandering in the streets, and so forth, I take it.

Juvenile delinquents.

I do not wish to curb the Deputy, but it seems to me he is travelling outside the scope of the Bill.

My only concern is to make the point that it is not enough to provide a force carefully trained to handle children in the streets, if part of the duties of such force involves the possibility of arrest and detention, unless we are satisfied that the conditions under which the children are subsequently detained are the best that we can provide. I believe the Minister is sympathetic and I am obliged to confess that I was a Minister myself for six years and I did not get as many reforms effected as I should have liked. But anyone with experience of Government knows that Ministers are expected to look after their own Departments and their intervention in their colleagues' affairs is not always welcome, if they get too querulous with Departments with which they are not primarily concerned.

I have been trying for, I think, 20 years to get this modest reform: if we take children into custody, as is certainly envisaged under this Bill, we should provide the district justice, who ultimately disposes of them, with all the information requisite for a just and prudent decision. I have made the submission repeatedly that a detention home such as Marlborough House— and my memory goes back to a detention home behind barred windows in Summerhill, but we shifted them out of that and went one step forward to Marlborough House—is not suitable. I want to make the case that, if the Minister is embarked upon this reform, he ought to go a step further and claim his right, as Minister for Justice, and discharge his duty, as Minister for Justice, of satisfying himself, as distinct from the Minister for Education, that conditions in Marlborough House are safe and satisfactory and effectively complementary to what he is trying to do under this Bill.

Subject to those observations, I join with the Minister in commending this Bill to the House and I exhort him to make any improvements in it that this discussion may indicate are necessary in order to ensure that this new departure will secure the services of the best available women, whether or not they talk Irish.

I welcome the introduction of this Bill. For a great number of years, various bodies and those engaged in social welfare work have urged successive Ministers for Justice to bring in a Bill of this character. I am sure this experiment will be a success if the women are trained on the right lines. I think it would be a great mistake to put them in a kind of watertight compartment and allow them to deal only with women and children. I know they will be trained in the same way as men are trained but, apart from that, I think they should be allowed to take part in all the duties that the men have to undertake at the moment so that they will have as wide a knowledge of the duties as possible.

I think it will help them in their specialised work to have that extra knowledge. For instance, it would be very valuable in the detection line. It is acknowledged that some of the best detective story-writers are women. I think the reason for that is that women are used to dealing with details. Perhaps their special gift for detail would help them in work connected with detective work.

The main object of this Bill is to provide women police to look after women and children. That is very necessary because, in any city, there is always dangers for younger girls. Some of them come up from the country where there is not that danger. Public opinion carries a good deal of weight as regards the way women conduct themselves at home and in public; the neighbours talk, and so on. The result is that that, in itself, is a deterrent. When they come up to a big city they are very isolated. Nobody can be so lonely as in a city. They have no friends, perhaps. They do not know their neighbours on either side. They may run into trouble. The very fact that women police are walking about and looking after their interests will, I think, have a deterrent effect upon them.

Some people may ask: "Why put women into uniform? Can women social workers not be just as good? What is the point of putting women into uniform?" The whole point of the uniform is that it gives an air of authority. When a Guard is off duty and is in civilian clothes, though he still remains a Guard, I think he suddenly loses that air of authority. Perhaps we have the feeling that it is all right to park in the wrong place or to do something we should not do because he does not look like a Guard. That is why I think there is a sort of psychological effect created by a uniform.

I hope the girls will be well turned out. I hope they will be smartly dressed, that their uniform will be smart and will look good. I hope it will not be frumpish but, instead, welldesigned and attractive. The girls will have that extra feeling of smartness if they know they look smart and they will be better Guards for that reason.

There have been women police in many countries for very many years. I do not think any country which started a women police service has given it up. They have all decided it is a good service, that it helps to look after the morals of the young women and also that it helps in the care of children. There are many ways in which young children can get into trouble. If they have a sympathetic policewoman to keep an eye on them, I think there will be less of that vagrancy, general pilfering and other things that go on in a city. Therefore, I think the Minister is very wise to bring in this Bill.

I hope that, when the experiment in Dublin has ended, the service will be extended to other cities because any city, no matter what its size, can benefit by this service. If the women are well-trained, they will be a great help. As I said before, I know they will be trained in the same duties as the men, but I think they should also be trained by women experts in dealing with women and children.

These girls will be very young when they are first trained: they will be between 21 and 25 years. Consequently, they will not have had very much experience of life. For that reason, I think it is necessary to have specialists to give them that extra training in their special work. I congratulate the Minister very much on this experiment. I hope and I am sure it will be a success.

I am sure all Deputies hope and trust that this experiment will be successful. I should like the Minister to tell us what the estimated cost of the service is. Deputy Mrs. Crowley pointed out that previous Ministers for Justice failed to bring in this measure. I want to refer to the reason why I did not do so during my term of office as Minister for Justice. I received representations, on occasions. I was not personally against the idea of having women police, but I recognised the fact that, at the particular time, we had voluntary organisations in other parts of the country as well as in Dublin. The fear Deputy Mrs. Crowley expresses does not, therefore, arise.

The percentage of females convicted is very small. I was not prepared to have the experiment in Dublin and to leave out Waterford, Cork and Limerick. At the time when I asked for the returns, we were going through a financial crisis. The estimate I was given for special barracks, accommodation, and so on, did not, in my view, justify my recommending the Government at that time to undergo that heavy expenditure which, I felt, was out of proportion to the number of recruits involved.

I suggest that this experiment should be extended to help the voluntary organisations in Cork, Limerick and Waterford and that a certain number of policewomen should be stationed in these centres. We shall have the demands afterwards and we might just as well begin at the beginning. Why is the experiment to be carried out in Dublin only?

I was also confronted with the problem that there would be no night duty for these women police after 8 o'clock. That was against all the arguments that had been put up to me for having women police in the various cities. I do not want to mention the amount which I was given as an estimate of the cost of the service but I may say I considered it very heavy at a time when we were going through a financial crisis. The Minister must have had an estimate of the cost of having 12 women police, with special accommodation, special barracks, in Dublin. Will we have cars for them? How many officers will be in charge of the 12 policewomen? If we had full information in regard to all these matters we would be in a better position to judge whether or not we can extend the service to the other cities at the one time.

Personally, I am not against the Bill and I hope it will be a success. I am very glad that, like previous Ministers, the Minister has recognised the work of the female assistance and the work of the male Guards in dealing with difficult cases. No female was ever arrested without having female searchers and female assistance and there were voluntary organisations to give the advice which Deputy Mrs. Crowley considers necessary for young girls coming up to the city from the country. We are very glad to have the organisations in the various cities throughout the country. Even though we may have women police, the cooperation of the voluntary organisations in Cork, and elsewhere will be most helpful. With their assistance, I believe we shall be able to secure what we all have in mind.

I do not want an imitation of what has happened in Northern Ireland or in England where women police, under 25 years, are trying to act as male policemen—probably watching the licenced premises, hotels, and so on. I was assured by the powers that be that there would be no night duty for the women police. Probably the Minister has some other information which he can give us. If we have a Supplementary Estimate for this purpose we shall be better able to judge the position and debate it more fully and accurately.

Why confine the experiment to Dublin? Why not try it out also in Cork, Limerick and Waterford, for example, and give these centres an equal number who will work, for the time being, with the voluntary organisations there? I had in mind that, with the co-operation of the two groups, we should be able to assure the success of the new force we are now about to organise.

In recruiting a police force, the first thing we require is a force that will inspire confidence, and to get that we must have commanding personnel in it. The old Dublin Metropolitan Police and Metropolitan Gardai were probably the best known police force in Europe, and they were known as such because of the commanding physical personalities of the individuals comprising that force. I am not going to criticise the personnel of the force to-day—I think that would be very unfair—but now that we are starting off to recruit a woman police force it is very essential that good physique be one of the requirements.

Unlike my colleague, Deputy Dillon, I welcome this test in oral Irish. When I heard in the Minister's speech of a written test, my combs automatically got up. I hoped that the commanding personalities of the women of the West and North-West would form the nucleus of this force. We must not forget that the old D.M.P. and the D.M.G. were recruited from rural Ireland and not from the City of Dublin. The majority of them were from rural Ireland and I hope the majority of this new force will come from rural Ireland, and that they will be 100 per cent. Irish speaking. However, when I hear of a test in written Irish, I can see the recoiling of prospective applicants from entering this force. One can imagine girls down in Mayo, Kerry or Donegal, native Irish speakers, being asked to come to town here to pass a test in written Irish set by the Civil Service Commissioners. One can imagine how they will recoil from such a test, or entering for it. I believe examinations, written examinations, are the curse of the country, as far as the Irish language is concerned. We ought to concentrate on more oral Irish and try to build up an Irish-speaking country as distinct from a country composed of scholars of the Irish language.

I welcome this Bill and I am in agreement with everything the Minister has said, with that exception, that there should be no written test in Irish. I see nothing in the Bill for the promotion of members of this new force. Perhaps the Minister in replying might tell us if there will be provision made for the promotion of the members of this new force. I sincerely hope there will be. I should like to see these 12 recruits under the control of their own sergeant and own inspector in the very near future and working in close cooperation with their male counterparts.

I should like to know what is to happen the four or five women attached to the police force in Dublin? Is there any provision for their pension rights? I understand these poor old ladies have been attached to this force for years and years. They are attached to it but are not of it, and I sincerely hope the Minister will see they are properly compensated when they retire on the recruitment of this new force.

I was very interested to hear what Deputy Mrs. Crowley had to say on this. I think her contribution was a most useful one, and perhaps, the Minister would consult not only lady Deputies of this House, but organisations which are run by very many voluntary women's associations in the city. I, with Deputy Everett, hope this new force will be extended to other cities, but we would like to know what is to be the cost of the force.

Deputy Everett pin-pointed the trouble in his time, an estimate for separate barrack quarters and separate transport. We know all these things will mount up and it would be very useful if we knew what it is to cost to provide 12 women police for the City of Dublin. I should like to see the force extended later to rural areas, particularly Border areas. I do not know if any person here has any experience of women searchers on the Border. I, as a solicitor, have. Clients of mine have been searched on a number of occasions by lady searchers on the Border, and I can assure you their standard of education is not very high.

Do they speak Irish?

It is not the Irish language they speak, I can assure you of that, and they do not all come from the Twenty-Six Counties. It would be a good thing if we had some liaison between Customs and Excise and the Garda in the provision of women searchers at key positions such as Dundalk, Monaghan and Lifford, where they could be called upon when required by the officers of customs and excise to carry out some of the unpleasant duties they have to perform. It is a bad thing that some person be called in at a few moments' notice to assist customs and excise officers to carry out these unpleasant duties. I welcome the Bill, but I should like to know what the new force will cost.

Is main liom an rá go bhfuil ionadh orm agus náire orm ag éisteacht leis an Teachta Ó Dioliún ag caint i gcoinne scrudú scríofa agus scrúdú béil sa teanga Ghaelach, ach tá áthas orm go ndúirt and Teachta Ó Domhnaill go bhfuil sé i bhfábhar scrudú béil. Ní thuigim cad na thaobh go bhfuil sé i gcoinne scrúdú scríofa. Tá fhios ag gach duine go bhfuil eolas cuíosach maith ag buachaillí agus cailíní atá fiche nó fiche cúig bliana d'aois, ar an teanga.

Níil an scrúdú de dhíth, má tá sé sin fíor.

Caid tuige go bhfuil an scrúdú ann mar sin?

Tá fhios ag gach éinne go bhfuil an Ghaeilge níos fearr ag na daoine óga sa scríbhinn.

Sin é an troiblóid. Tá sé sin fíor.

Ach tá fhios ag gach éinne go bhfuil and méad sin den teanga acu gur féidir leo scrúdú simplí a dhéanamh——

Tá an fhírinne agat.

Scrúdú béil agus scrúdú scríofa. Is ceart a leithéid sin a bheith ann. Ní hé sin an scrúdú iomlán. Tá daoine ann a fuair oideachas maith tré Ghaeilge agus is ceart go mbhainfidís buntáiste éigin as.

I was very much surprised to hear Deputy Dillon speak against the holding of an oral examination or an oral test for candidates for the women police force. It appears to be looked upon as a kind of privilege for people who have some knowledge of the Irish languages themselves to be able to criticise and condemn its use. That is what it amounts to. The language has been taught in all the schools in this country for the past 40 or 50 years, to put it mildly. Consequently, everyone between 20 and 25 years of age at this juncture has a fairly good knowledge of the native language. We have experience of that every day. I am sure no one will be failed if a reasonable knowledge is shown. The Minister has explained that the interview will be the most important part of the test. Everyone has seen, from time to time, that when those breaking the law are questioned by the Gardaí, particularly the older Gardaí, some people will answer in Irish, thinking they are embarrassing the Guards by doing so.

It is a bad motive to attribute to them.

Everyone has had that kind of experience. I have seen it myself, and I am sure Deputy O'Donnell knows it and recognises it as well as I do. It has happened again and again. Those connected with the Garda know it is a habit of cheeky young fellows when they are misbehaving and are brought to task for it.

Are they not right to give their names in Irish?

They are, but they do not do it for that purpose. They do it to embarrass the Guards, in the hope they may not be able to take a proper note of it or a proper note of the answers to questions. In consequence, one of the essential things at the present day is a knowledge sufficient to carry out the simple discharge of their duties. I am sure the Minister or those responsible for recruiting a responsible body of people for these duties could not ignore the fact that part of their education is a knowledge of their own language, and that it would be helpful to them to have it.

Apart from that, it is the national duty of everybody. The Opposition know that their own Leader has, through the years, advocated the teaching and use of the Irish language. No one wants to make this question an issue as to its being only a school subject in all the schools—primary, secondary and university, the same as the other subjects of English, French or other languages that may be taught. If a knowledge of another language and of other subjects is a qualification, surely a knowledge of our own language should be so recognised?

The Bill is a welcome one. No doubt, this whole question has been under examination for some years. Articles have been written in newspapers and elsewhere for and against it, but mainly in favour of it. It is good and desirable that these ladies should be recruited for these duties. I am sure they will work in close contact with the voluntary organisations. Much of their work, as Deputy Mrs. Crowley has said, will be on the social side, as guides, and so on, to the wayward, and they will be helpful in that regard. Of course, those who are recruited cannot all be brought in from country districts. Some of them will need a knowledge of the city and of city life. There will be an admixture, I am sure, and their qualities and knowledge will be of mutual help.

In time, some limited numbers will be extended, as has been said, into the other cities, to help there in the same type of work as that for which they are being recruited in the metropolis. It is better to try here in the centre and then extend, when training and experience have been acquired. Some of those who have been trained can be sent then to the other cities, to guide along the new recruits. That the numbers be limited is desirable, as it also is that the best quality and the most striking in personality and appearance be recruited, so as to make an impression of the purpose for which they are recruited and the aims of the Minister in bringing in the Bill, in order to have their help in the administration of the laws and in the social guidance of the population.

I should like to welcome this Bill very much. I know this matter has been under review for a long time in the Department of Justice, and I also know—as probably other Deputies know—that there has been considerable pressure from social organisations and women's organisations to have a women's police force established here. I find myself very much in agreement with the speech of Deputy Mrs. Crowley, who has expressed very lucidly to this House what most of us must feel on this subject.

As I read the Bill and the Minister's speech, it appears that we are to have a small force of 12 women Gardaí, set up in Dublin, whose ages are to be between 20 and 25. It seems to me that, as this is a new force and a specialised force, it would be to advantage that they should have a certain amount of maturity within their ranks. They will have a difficult job, due to the inherent conservation of the Irish race in regard to any innovation, and to set up such a force of young people might not achieve the objective sought.

I notice in the Minister's opening address that we already have four female counsellors who are not actually police but people who advise the Gardaí on certain matters. I do not know what their ages are or how long they have been in their present positions but it seems to me that they should get priority in being absorbed into this new force. They must have had experience already and they must have had contact with the Garda authorities. It would make for the better establishment of this force if they were absorbed into it.

None of them will ever see 60 again.

Deputy O'Donnell says so, but perhaps the Minister will tell us more about it. Even if they are fairly advanced in years, they are mature and would help to build up a new force. This force is to be established in Dublin. I do not know what the exact pattern is within the force itself and whether it is possible to transfer on temporary duties members of the force in Dublin to other areas. I feel the Minister is wise in starting this recruitment and setting up the force in Dublin and I see no reason why these members of the force should not be transferred to other areas, not necessarily permanently, because there may not be work for them in other areas, but they should be transferred whenever they are required in a particular area.

I am in agreement with this Bill and I feel the approach is right generally but I should not like to feel that we are going to set up a police force and have it purely as an experimental element in Dublin. What I mean is that this force is the nucleus of a female force which everybody believes to be essential here to deal with children and young women. Police are not only for the purpose of putting people in jail or dealing with criminals; they also have a very important part to play in giving advice in regard to children and young women. In many instances female police are far better qualified to do that than the male force.

That brings me to my final point. I do not think I am putting my case over well. What I am trying to convey to the House is that you have this new force coming into existence and I feel that if you are to recruit 12 young girls between the ages of 20 and 25 you will have a separate arm of the police force. Naturally young people of that age will come under the direct jurisdiction of the male members of the force and under the jurisdiction of the commissioner, but I think in the final analysis they should have some kind of control for themselves. That is why I suggest that those who are already affiliated with the police, these counsellors who, Deputy O'Donnell says, have already reached the age of 60, should be placed in control of this force so that they may have direct liaison with the existing police force.

I think this Bill will be welcomed generally throughout the country, but it is bound to receive a certain amount of criticism because the Irish nation is firmly conservative, which perhaps is no harm. This is an innovation which it is no harm to try and I congratulate the Minister on it.

All sides of the House appear to welcome this Bill but I personally have some reservations. I am not so apprehensive, however, since I heard the Minister state that these proposals are simply experimental. I have delved through three volumes of the Reports of the Royal Commission established by the House of Commons. They were very informative indeed and very lengthy documents and I would commend them to any Deputies who are interested in this project.

At the outset, I should like to say that I could not possibly agree with the Minister's suggestion that the age limit for these girls should be 20 to 25 years. I think it is completely unrealistic and that the minimum age should be 25 and the maximum age 35. I also disagree with the method of recruitment through the Civil Service. Evidently it is to be in accordance with the exact procedure adopted for the recruitment of members of the Garda Síochana. It is unfortunate that the Minister could not see his way to having a separate body or sub-committee set up to choose and recommend to the commissioner the most suitable candidates.

On the question of the Irish language I am in entire agreement with the necessity for that. I suppose it is inevitable also that, if recruitment is through the Civil Service, the usual procedure must ensue, that they must have a knowledge of written and oral Irish. I subscribe to Deputy O'Donnell's sentiments regarding the written section of the paper but that could be got over by having the written paper set by an Irish speaker from the area from which the recruit comes. There is a great difference between the spoken and written language as between one place and another. Even taking an ordinary school textbook like "Sé Dia an Fear is Fearr", which was written in the Northern dialect, there is a great difference between it and Munster Irish and even Connaught Irish.

I would ask the Minister if he possibly could to revise the age limit. We hear that one of the main duties will be protective. Someone mentioned protecting the morals of the young. Who is going to protect the morals of these young girls?

The sergeant.

There is something else which I think should be a qualification for this force. I think it appalling to have recruitment through the Civil Service. There are excellent schools in this area which teach physical culture. Evidently physical culture is not a qualification. I suppose some Deputies would suggest that we should recruit the 12 members from a camogie team which would be appalling. Much depends on the mentality of the individuals who will compromise the selection board. The Minister has not enlightened us whether it is to be a typical Civil Service selection board, and if the marks are to be allotted in the usual Civil Service way.

In the Royal Commission Reports which I read, of 25 girls who were put on the streets in uniform only three were kept on because it was found that in a probationary period of six months the remainder were unsuitable for various reasons. Will their appointment, in the first instance, be the same as that for the Garda Síochána. Is there to be a probationary period? The Minister has not enlightened us on that not has he enlightened us as to what their height and general physique are to be.

Five feet six inches.

No minimum girth.

In their stockinged feet. Under the Garda Síochána Act, 1925, I think the Minister is empowered to issue regulations to deal with such things. Deputy Dillon mentioned that the pay was five guineas to £8 odd. The rent allowance at present paid to members of the Garda Síochána is completely and utterly unrealistic. In the City of Limerick, I think it is £53 per year. Is it proposed to put these 12 women into a hostel with a Reverend Mother over them, or is it proposed that they should seek flats? Everyone knows that the cost of a flat or "digs" in Dublin at the present time can be between £3 and £4 per week. If they are to get five guineas per week, we might not be able to attract the right type of recruit. With regard to the rent allowance, I presume the Minister will point out, when replying, that the commissioner has the right to use discretionary powers in that connection.

The duties of these women polices will evidently not be confined to what they should be. They will have the powers of ordinary members of the force, should their superior officers so desire. If their superior officers do not so deem, automatically these police will have the right of arrest. I understand that the ordinary citizen has power of arrest in the case of a felony. I wonder is it at all wise to give these females the same duties as the male members in certain respects? In other words, why not confine their activities to certain specified duties?

Deputy Everett was apprehensive in relation to night duty. It is quite obvious that some of their duties will begin only after 8 o'clock. I suppose, like the people in other Departments or in other concerns, they will have to take their rota on day as well as night duty. If the Minister could have given us more information in his opening statement on these various points, it would have cut this debate very short indeed.

There is another matter which is a very serious one. Some Deputy referred to the raiding of licensed premises. Women being what they are, you might get one of them who has a complete aversion to alcohol. She might be a certain type of social worker and very genuine, but she might spend most of her night duty raiding certain premises when the ordinary male member of the force would exercise his discretion.

I would ask the Minister to let us know if the commissioner has the power of directing specified duties to which these women will be allotted. Furthermore, it should be clearly understood that none of this force will be allotted to duties which might result in supplanting a male member of the force. In other words, it should be clearly understood that no male member will become redundant and that they will not be paid for clerical and other work which would be competently carried out by a male.

I subscribe to the view of Deputy Mrs. Crowley with regard to the uniform. It will be most interesting to see how the Civil Service arrive at a design for the uniform for the new women police. I shudder to think what they might be turned out in. The Aer Lingus hostesses have very nicely designed uniforms. They are a credit to Ireland.

Donegal tweed.

I think the Minister would be well advised to have a small select body or group to choose these people and to choose the uniform they wear. Finally, I think the Minister should reconsider very seriously the age group. I think the age group of 21 years to 25 years is altogether too confined. There should also be provision for a person of the type mentioned by Deputy O'Donnell to take charge of these people.

Like all the other speakers, I welcome this Bill. I congratulate the Minister on having succeeded in breaking down the prejudices which must have existed in this State for a long time against the establishment of women police. I can imagine the amount of opposition encountered before he got acceptance of the principle for the implementation of the idea. Women's organisations have been fighting hard for the introduction of a women's police force for many a long year, particularly the Joint Committee of Women's Societies and Social Workers who have done trojan work in getting the Government to come to an agreement about the establishment of the force.

It is not a revolutionary step, for most countries in the world have women police forces. There is a women's police force in America, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Sweden, France, the Netherlands, England, Wales and the Six Counties. We welcome, indeed, the decision of the Minister and the Government to introduce this Bill.

The need for women police is based on two well-established facts. Women are best suited to deal with women and children. We have women offenders and child offenders. As the Minister said, the duties of the new force will be of a specialised nature. Their main duties will consist of taking depositions from women and children, attending women in court. Very often a woman offender is the only one of her sex in a court.

These women police will be of great value. They will help and advise girls in moral danger. They will attend women prisoners. All these duties were very distasteful for policemen and they were also distasteful for the women offenders. These women police will be very welcome. We hope that this force, doing specialised duties, will help to see that women offenders make good citizens and, on that account, we welcome this Bill.

I conclude by again congratulating the Minister on having introduced the Bill and I wish the new women police force every success.

I think we are entitled to welcome the measure introduced by the Minister. It has not been unexpected. There has been a good deal of pressure brought to bear on Governments for many years. The acceptance of the necessity for such a force was welcomed by all, for very good reasons known to everybody.

I have not heard the Minister's opening statement but I take it that the number —12—for initial recruitment, is purely experimental. I hope it is intended to extend the force to areas other than Dublin. It is completely fallacious to think that a women police force is not necessary in rural areas. Anybody who has seen Gardaí trying to arrest itinerants or camping visitors who periodically annoy the rural population would immediately appreciate the necessity for having female assistance at times. If women police are not located in rural stations, they could be stationed withing striking distance of any area to which they could be brought by squad car when necessary. I hope that that is the intention. While nobody wants to see women replacing Gardaí, it is to be hoped that the women police will be extended to carry out duties of a suitable type in all areas when necessary.

I do not think it feasible that women police should be assigned to special duties only. I could visualise a situation where a policewoman would have to close her eyes to something that might ordinarily lead to crime if she was not permitted to take part in the ordinary duties of a police force. Women police should be allowed, generally, a free hand in all police duties, concentrating, no doubt, on those specialised problems for which their sex makes them suitable.

A good deal of stress has been laid on the question of uniform. I suppose it is important. It is important only in so far as that it should be sightly and a means of attracting a good type of recruit, but I would be in favour of the people who recruit the force concentrating more on the amazon type than on the glamorous type. If there is emphasis on glamour we may not get the type of person best suited to carry out police duties. There should not be too much concentration on the smart cut of the uniform and the angle of the hat and so forth.

That would attract more than the delinquent.

We might not get the best type of recruit. While I agree with Deputy Mrs. Crowley that the uniform should be smart and in keeping with the good force we are now establishing, the entire emphasis should not be on that aspect.

The establishment of a women police force is a new venture in this country. We are making history so far as that is concerned. The future of the force will depend on what the first effort is like. I agree with Deputy O'Malley that the age limits 21-25 are rather low and will produce rather immature persons to do the work that they may have to do. As years go on, they will mature but it could not be expected that at that early age they would have all the attributes of a good working police force. One can visualise what their duties will be. It is not a matter of parading the street to let the public see how smart they are. Their duties can be very tough and will require all the stamina and ability of a mature woman. I do not know if they will carry batons and be permitted to use them. Women are reputed to be fairly good with the rolling-pin at times and they might be just as well able as a man to wield a baton.

I agree with my colleague, Deputy O'Donnell, that one is more likely to get the better type of recruit for this force from the rural areas than from the cities. I would strongly recommend that the Irish language be obligatory in the test for recruitment. I cannot follow the point made by Deputies that the written portion of the Irish test should not be compulsory. As Deputy MacCarthy said, speaking in Irish, there is no person of the age prescribed, or there should be no person, who is not capable of doing a written examination in Irish just as well as an oral examination. That applies particularly to persons on Gaeltacht areas who most certainly would be quite capable of doing the entire examination through the medium of Irish, if necessary.

I do not want to suggest that it should be the deciding factor but it is essential that candidates should have a good knowledge of Irish. Deputy MacCarthy was very realistic when he said that sometimes people who are not imbued with the spirit of Irish will insist on speaking Irish to the Gardaí in the hope that it will embarrass them because some of the older members of the force may not have the competent knowledge of the language that most of the younger members have. For that reason, it is imperative that the women police should have a reasonably good knowledge of oral Irish.

I do not think there is anything more one can say without repeating what has been said already. This is an innovation in this State. It is important to step off on the right foot and to see that the best possible type, adaptable to the particular duties, will be recruited in the initial stages. It is on this first attempt that the future of the force will depend. If we select the right people now, we shall have considerably increased numbers in a few years, because I am certain that the establishment of this force will justify itself, as it has in other countries in which it was tried, and will lead towards not merely the detection of crime but its prevention, which is much more important.

I am at one with those people who do not agree with that system of police duty where the policeman goes out merely to make the catch. I am entirely in favour of the advice which has been given by the commissioner to all the recruits who have been passed our recently, that the book should be kept in the pocket as much as possible and that they should rely more on advice than on going out to catch people for the sake of having a record of detection to their credit. I hope the same advice will be given to the force to be recruited now. However, I think we can rely on the commissioner to place the emphasis on that type of advice and training.

I, with the other Deputies, congratulate the Minister on taking this decision. It was taken, I am sure, only after the most careful examination and with the best advice available. I think it will have the approval of all sections of the community, and we shall look forward with interest to see how the force will develop. As I said at the outset, I hope that a limited number of them will be distributed throughout the country where they will be within striking distance of any area where such a police force may be required.

I welcome the advance made by the Minister in introducing this Bill for the establishment of a women's police force. It is in the experimental stages now, but I should like to see recruited to that force ladies who have a knowledge of social work. We have in this city ladies who have been associated with the welfare of their fellow men and women and of children over a long number of years. There is one organisation of which I have great experience and which has a great record in relation to the number of women they rehabilitated to a proper way of life. This women's police force should be recruited from women of that type, who have good knowledge of psychology, who have a good approach to a problem and who will be looked upon by the people anxious to commit crime in this city—young and old women and children—as their friends and not as somebody who is spying on them.

The probation officers in the courts, who have been trained for this work, have succeeded in doing excellent work in dealing with crime and through the passing of this Bill I look forward to a great advance in the elimination of offences by women and children and even by men.

However, it is my opinion that the age limit of 20 to 25 is too restricted. If it were from 23 to 30 we would attract a more mature type. I should also like to see a better scale of pay being offered, if we are to attract the best type of girl to the force. There is a Deputy behind me talking about a pension, but if they are attractive, they will not be long enough in the force to draw a pension. I welcome the Bill. I wish the new force luck and congratulate the Minister on introducing it.

I was not present to hear the Minister's speech, although I got the gist of it on the radio. I regret that I do not know what has been said and I suppose what I am about to say has already been covered. Such a force as this is necessary here because it has been established throughout the Continent and in the Six Counties. I saw them there directing traffic quite competently and they could be used for the same purpose here and also for secretarial work— I am sure we could save money in that way— but primarily to deal with matters which are peculiarly the duties of women, such as the welfare of children and, particularly, the detection of shop-lifting offences.

It is very difficulty for a male member of the Garda to follow shoplifters into stores which are mainly concerned with women's wear. They are usually recognised but a woman Garda could do that job. I had myself to report a woman shoplifter. She lifted several things on me and the Garda informed me that they found it quite difficult to detect her. This person was on their list for six months and had got away with hundreds of thefts, particularly where women's wear was concerned. That is a case where women could easily do something which male members of the Gardaí could not do.

The Minister has pointed out that on marriage members of this force must resign. I agree with that because I do not think married women should be employed by the State but I am concerned about how much it will cost to retire these ladies. If pensions are to be given on marriage, how long must members of the force serve beforehand?

Finally, I would suggest to the Minister that while recruits should not be actually horsefaced, they should not be too good-looking; they should be just plain women and not targets for marriage.

It is true, as has been said here by numerous Deputies, that requests for the establishment of a force of this kind have been made over many years. As far back as 1931 a committee which was known as the Carrigan Committee reported on the Criminal Law (Amendment) Acts and juvenile prostitution. It recommended that in the Dublin Metropolitan Division a staff of at least 12 specially-trained policewomen should be provided. In 1950, a committee was set up to inquire into the organisation of the Garda. It was known as the Deegan Committee, and that committee, having heard evidence from the Joint Committee of Women's Societies and Social Workers, examined the case for appointing policewomen. After discussions with the Garda authorities and individual officers it made the following recommendations:—

"From our examination of the problem we are satisfied that there are many duties, mainly in connection with matters affecting children, young women and girls, on which policewomen could be usefully employed in the cities. We recommend therefore that policewomen should be recruited as members of the Garda Síochána. Until experience has been gained of this innovation we would confine their activities to the Dublin Metropolitan Area, and we recommend that as an experiment, and when amending legislation is enacted, a corps of 12 policewomen should be assigned to that area."

The committee thought that while the duties of policewomen would primarily be concerned with matters affecting children and young women and girls they should be given wide experience and should, as far as possible, be employed on the same duties as their male colleagues.

These recommendations were made by committees of very responsible persons and Deputies will notice that, in this Bill, we are in effect adopting the recommendations contained in the reports of these committees.

The written examination which these young ladies will undergo will be on the same basis as that for male candidates for the Garda. In addition to the written qualifying test there will be an interview at which appearance, intelligence, personality, special qualifications and general suitability will be taken into account. Final placings will be based on the results of the interview only and women candidates will be required to pass an oral test in Irish before appointment.

I casually mentioned in the course of my statement that there would be a qualifying written examination in educational subjects including Irish and apparently arising from that simple statement Deputy Dillon made a most impassioned attack on such a requirement. He asked what benefit the use of knowledge of Irish would be to these women in dealing with people in Summerhill or Ballybough. He said he was born in that area and knew all about it. I submit Deputy Dillon is living in the past and is dealing with the situation that may have existed when he was a boy. He forgets that since that time, and for a generation now, knowledge of the Irish language is a necessity in almost every examination for public posts. I have never heard Deputy Dillon attack the requirement of a knowledge of Irish in respect of civil servants, nor in respect of any of the other public appointments where Irish is regarded as necessary and I fail to understand why he should attack it in this case. The people of Summerhill and Ballybough have been taught Irish in the schools. It may not be the type the purists would speak but at least they have an elementary knowledge of the language and most of them would be able to understand it.

Deputy Dillon also fails to realise that these policewomen patrolling in the centre of the city, say in O'Connell Street, might very well be asked questions in Irish and if they were incapable of answering it would make them, and the State also, appear ridiculous. That is all I want to say about the Deputy's remarks regarding the requirement of a knowledge of Irish.

The Deputy took the minimum pay figure of five guineas and said it was not sufficient. That five guineas is actually for the period after they are accepted into the force and while they are undergoing training. Later on, that amount will be increased. They will get £6 7s. 6d. on completion of training. At the end of a year after their appointment, it will go up to £6 10s. 2d. and it will then go up by the usual increments year by year to £8 7s. 6d. The Deputy also mentioned the question of uniform, as did a number of other Deputies. That is under examination and I have no doubt but that a suitable type of uniform will evolve. I agree it is necessary that these ladies should look well and, as some Deputy remarked, the very fact that they feel they look well will make them efficient.

Deputy Everett seemed to be concerned about the cost of the women police force. He mentioned that it was one of the things that had deterred him, when Minister, from taking any action on the matter. I secured the agreement of the Government to this project by reason of the fact that the cost will be negligible because, instead of recruiting 12 men, we will recruit 12 women. Therefore, whatever extra cost there may be will not, as the Deputy seemed to suggest, necessitate a Supplementary Estimate or something of that kind.

Several Deputies said it was desirable to extend this force from Dublin to Cork and other county boroughs, and even into rural Ireland. This may arise in time. As I have said, this is merely an experiment and we have got to see how it will operate in its initial stages. If it is successful—and I believe it will be because it is a necessary step and one which should have been taken many years ago—I shall be very happy. A similar experiment was carried out in the Six Counties in 1943. They began with only six policewomen. The force has operated very successfully there and, from that initial six, its strength has grown to one district inspector, one head constable, three sergeants and 29 constables. I feel confident that similar success will obtain here in the course of some years.

I was also asked about promotion. Promotion in the women police will operate in due course as it is operating in the Garda Síochána. I was also asked what will become of the women police assistants who are at present operating in an unofficial capacity. They will continue as at present. They are probably outside the age limits for entry into the new force.

The discussion, if it does nothing else, will have served a very useful purpose by drawing the attention of likely candidates to the fact that one of the essential requirements for becoming a member of the force will be a knowledge of the Irish language. But I disagree completely with Deputy Dillon's remarks about the necessity for having a knowledge of Irish.

Has the Minister stated the age limits for recruiting?

I mentioned that in my opening statement—20 to 25.

Would you think it right to take girls before 25? You might waste your time training them and then find they get married. Or will you prevent them getting married? Do you think that another language besides Irish—say, French—might be necessary?

All qualifications will be accepted. The marriage hazard is one of the things we have to accept.

I understand there was some kind of agreement that we would get the remaining stages to-day?

I know of no such arrangement but I know of no objection, either.

There is not much in the other stages.

Would the Minister take them immediately after questions before we get back to education?

Question put and agreed to.
Agreed to take remaining stages to-day.
Barr
Roinn