Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Tuesday, 20 Mar 1962

Vol. 194 No. 1

Committee on Finance. - Vote No. 45—Transport and Power

Debate resumed on the following motion:
That a supplementary sum not exceeding £10,000 be granted to defray the charge which will come in course of payment during the year ending on the 31st day of March, 1962, for the Salaries and Expenses of the Office of the Minister for Transport and Power, including certain Services administered by that Office, and for payment of sundry Grants-in-Aid.— (Minister for Transport and Power).

When I reported progress last week, I was dealing with the facilities for tourists in my constituency. Because of the efforts made locally in Carlow, we have succeeded in attracting tourists to the area for coarse fishing and other sports. I am wondering if we advertise the country sufficiently. I am sure Bord Fáilte are doing good work, but I sometimes wonder if we are getting the message over. Mention was made of the weather. We have had some bad summers. Why not utilise our hotels in winter for hunting, fishing and shooting? I think there should be more concentration on advertising those attractions. That would help the hoteliers in the lean season.

With regard to the smaller hotels, I wonder are we giving sufficient help? I have in mind the hotel which caters for the family man who cannot afford the luxury hotel. Grants or loans should not be made contingent on the number of rooms and the facilities and amenities. Certain standards must be preserved, but there should not be too great an emphasis on the highest standards in every case. Those are the main points I wish to make. I would ask the Minister to do all in his power for these smaller hotels throughout the country.

In conclusion, I should like to say that Bord Fáilte are doing good work. We have the facilities and the tourist trade is developing, which is something we are all glad to see. Anything spent on helpful advertising or publicity will be money well spent.

I want to say that I agree entirely with Deputy Governey. I do not think we have ever fully got under way in publicising our fishing amenities. I remember when I inaugurated the Inland Fisheries Trust, we were primarily preoccupied with trout fishing. That was in 1951. When I came back to office in 1954, considerable progress had been made in clearing trout waters of the predator fish and it then struck me that in confining our attention to trout, we were overlooking what might be in fact an even greater tourist attraction.

I remember inviting the directors of the Inland Fisheries Trust to meet me and immediately we ran up against the snag that from the funds then available, it was taxing our ability to do the minimum of work necessary to serve the trout fisheries. In fact, I had on my hands one conscientious public servant who said he wanted to resign because he felt his salary was too heavy a charge on the funds available. I then consulted with the Tourist Board and I must say I found a splendid atmosphere of cooperation. They appreciated the value of the fishing industry, the fishing amenity, as an adjunct of the tourist industry and we started on the work of developing coarse fishing on which substantial work has been done in certain areas. The coarse fishes fall broadly into pike, perch, bream, roach and tench.

We in Ireland are most familiar with perch, pike and bream. There are many elements in England who regard tench and roach as very important adjuncts but the queer thing in Ireland is that there exists a peculiar kind of tacit prejudice against coarse fishing. Possibly it is because we call it coarse fishing but the interesting fact is that it is probably true to say now that pike, perch and bream are a greater tourist attaction than trout or salmon. It is true to say that we have in this country trout and salmon fishing probably cheaper than you would get anywhere else in the world and that we have in many parts of the country free trout fishing and, I think, even some free salmon fishing. Of course, a great deal of the salmon fishing is privately controlled but we must be almost unique in Europe in having free trout and salmon fishing in certain areas.

Trout and salmon fishing are very much an art and an art very much confined to a relatively narrow section of the community. The number of persons who enjoy fishing for perch, bream, pike, roach or tench—and I am deliberately trying to avoid the expression "coarse fish" because I believe it has a pejorative sense which is doing damage—is infinitely greater and the congestion in that type of fishing in Great Britain is reaching saturation point. I do not believe that we have ever made it known effectively to the people of Durham, Lancashire, Yorkshire and Staffordshire that there are in this country almost unlimited fishing facilities for these types of fish. I believe if effective measures were taken to that end, a vastly increasing number of tourists could be attracted.

Deputy Governey mentioned that one of the special attractions of this type of fishing is that it will draw tourists to Ireland at a time when no other tourist traffic is probable. Of course hunting will do the same, but the number of people who want to hunt in terms of the tourist industry is strictly limited but the number of people who will go out in February to fish for pike is fantastic, if incomprehensible to most of us. You will see people sallying forth in weather which is next to freezing and standing in what seems to be utter misery on the bank of a lake or a canal or a river, patiently fishing for pike on the shortest day of the year. That traffic can be captured for this country.

Mark you, heretofore one of the great problems of that kind of traffic was that you had a relatively short period of daylight and the question of occupying their evenings away from home presented a problem. Cinemas and pike do not ordinarily share the same abode but with the advent of television, there is no part of Ireland so remote that the person coming from Birmingham or elsewhere on a fishing holiday will not find occupation in the evening time, either through the medium of television or the ordinary social intercourse of the country house which will make his sojourn here quite agreeable and quite practicable. If we could draw that kind of traffic, particularly into the country areas where very elaborate accommodation is not sought but where comfortable accommodation is available, we could bring a very valuable supplemental income to a part of the country which badly needs it.

As the Minister has transferred his lares et penates from Longford-Westmeath to Monaghan, he will see in his new constituency the benefit of the work of the Inland Fisheries Trust with special reference to cultivation of this type of fishing amenity.

I should like to suggest to the Minister that the Inland Fisheries Trust and Bord Fáilte be exhorted to publicise, for one year at least to see what results there would be, on an intensive scale, the perch, pike, tench and roach fishing available in this country through the medium of the popular Anglers' Journal in Great Britain. I believe the result would be most gratifying. I believe that if a campaign were conducted there—which provided for a follow-up and invited persons to get in touch with Bord Fáilte either by correspondence or personal call—we could develop a growing influx of tourists of a very desirable kind, which would represent a very substantial asset to the country.

Another aspect of the problem which I must have mentioned 20 times before in this House, but it is very often difficult to get anything done, is this. Has anybody seen in any advertisement of this country any reference to the fishing amenity of the Royal and Grand Canals? I do not think a lot of Deputies regard that as serious. I think that is one of the most effective tourist attractions we have in this country for the type of tourist I have in mind.

Many a fisherman, going out, does not mind clambering over hedges and ditches along the bank of a river. However, we have, ready-made, two canal systems with free walking accommodation and fishing accommodation along their entire length. Yet, I have never heard anybody refer to it as a desirable site for fishing. I should have imagined we would publicise that as one of the principal fishing assets of this country. I know it to be true that the people living in the Black Country of Northern England are at present fishing in canals like the Manchester Ship Canal. Each man there will have a beat about five yards long on the bank allocated to him by the local angling group of which he is a member, on the strict understanding that he will carefully remove any perch or other fish he gets from the hook and put it back again. They do not bring the fish home, lest they fish out the canal.

I think that if you made it known to these people that here nobody gives a fiddle-de-dee whether you take home a ton of fish, provided you catch it legitimately with rod and line, they would hardly believe it. I would direct the attention of the Minister to the exceptional amenity represented by the canal. I should like to say a few words on the potentialities of the canal as a centre for swimming but I could scarcely bring that within the scope of tourism. I shall discuss that on the Local Government Vote. It breaks my heart every time I see the children of this city leaping into the canal in its present condition: there is nobody there to clear it up and make it safe for children to swim in. That is another story. I am now asking about the coarse fishing of the canal. I exhort the Minister to urge Bord Fáilte adequately to exploit it.

I come now to the subject of guest houses and small hotels. I am prepared to stand over substantial grants to big companies to help them to build substantial hotels. That need is there and, provided it is not carried too far, it can be justified. That kind of expenditure should not be to the exclusion of the small hotel and guest house. Is it not a queer thing that if you go to France for a holiday and you come back and say you stayed in a pension it is quite fashionable but if you go to Connemara for a holiday and say you stayed in a guest house you immediately drop three steps in the social scale?

What about a bothán?

I am not quite sure what the Deputy means by a bothán. I am familiar with the Cork and the Donegal dialects and the Connacht dialect but the dialect of East Limerick at the moment escapes me.

West Kerry.

What does the word mean?

Deputy O'Donnell will translate it for you.

As Béarla, led thoil.

Ask Deputy O'Donnell.

To be serious, I think we underestimate the potentiality of the Irish equivalent of a pension in the country. There are many country houses in Ireland which could be made very comfortable. I admit that in the case of many of these houses the people have not adverted to the fact that there is available to them this source of income. I have seen it happen in the constituency represented by the Minister and myself. I think the danger is that when some of the people wake up to the potentialities, they make the mistake of being too ambitious in the initial stages. They want to convert the houses not into pensions but into hotels and the capital investment may very well cripple them. It would be much better for them to recognise that there is a place, a very well-recognised place, in the tourist industry for a pension.

I suggest that, perhaps, one of the mistakes Bord Fáilte make is that they dwell too much on the concept of the hotel. In fact, they make provision that you must have certain minimum standards in order to put up "Hotel" outside your house. Bord Fáilte would be better employed in saying: "We are concerned for accurate description of the kind of accommodation you offer to your prospective clients. There is nothing inferior in the accommodation provided by a pension but it is different from the accommodation ordinarily offered by a hotel. Do not call your premises a hotel but call it a guest house. You will find Bord Fáilte are just as ready and willing to convert your house into a suitable guest house as it is to help a hotelier to expand his hotel.” These people have to get help from Bord Fáilte as to the kind of accommodation appropriate to a guest house—minima or maxima. They want to be warned not to provide too much and warned also that certain minimum standards are indispensable.

So what I would say to the Minister is that Bord Fáilte require to be reminded that in areas where tourism could, perhaps, be the greatest advantage of all-country towns—there is room for guest houses and small hotels and that very often encouragement in the effort, even persuasion, may be required on the part of Bord Fáilte in order to get the people to avail of the facilities Bord Fáilte are prepared to offer in order to bring the accommodation they intend to provide up to the standard appropriate to the category in which they wish to be recognised, whether it be hotels or guest houses.

The last thing I want to mention is this. We have discussed repeatedly the facilities for bringing motor cars to Ireland. It is a most mysterious thing that, although we have several shuttle services operating between this island and Great Britain, both for passengers and cars, it is extremely difficult and very expensive to bring a car to Ireland. I have never been fully able to understand that. Not only that, but if you overcome the difficulties and the expense, the inconvenience is very great. I am told if you want a motor car carried from Liverpool to Dublin, you must leave the car in Liverpool five hours before the boat sails. The net result is that you are rambling around half the day waiting for the boat to sail because it is necessary to have the car there several hours before sailing time.

On the other hand, if you are going to France you can drive down onto the boat and when the boat arrives at the jetty in France you can drive off again. Why is that? It surely ought to be possible that all the agencies at the disposal of the Minister, the Department of Industry and Commerce and the shipping companies would be brought together to provide that people could enjoy at least as good a service during the tourist season between Great Britain and Ireland as at present exists between Great Britain and France. Only persons expert in transport matters can provide an effective answer to the problem, but I must say that if I were Minister for Transport and Power I would call all the boys together and say to them: "I do not keep a dog and bark myself. All I am asking is that there should be provided here the same facilities as are provided between Britain and France. I want the same facilities for persons who desire to come here as are enjoyed by people who wish to go to the Continent and between all of you you should be able to provide it."

I think that would be a reasonable requisition to the shipping companies and the civil servants. Unless a pistol is put to somebody's head nothing will be done; everything will jog along as at present because the people who suffered the inconvenience are mainly people who are here for a period. It is people who will not face the inconvenience who constitute the real loss which we are suffering because, remember, it is virtually certain that every car that comes here brings up to four tourists and it is not only the person who drives the car but the people who come with him who spend the money; and it is not only the petrol that is consumed but the expenditure of the party during their stay here.

For years it was possible to allow a bus with anything up to 30 tourists to come into the country but when that was stopped the result was that a vast volume of that traffic was diverted to the Continent. Somebody then said: "This must stop", and they have been rolling in since to the advantage of everybody and the detriment of nobody. If it is possible to get a bus in here simply because an organised and powerful body in Britain sent it, surely it should be possible to get cars in more conveniently.

We are making a tremendous effort.

I am not giving the Minister a rude or a short answer when I say that when people tell me they are making a tremendous effort, I always get a little sceptical. I would prefer rather the attitude of the late M. Talleyrand who, approached by his Queen, said: "If it is very difficult, it is done; if it is impossible, we shall see". I do not see why the thing is not done.

I do not see how it can be done by Great Britain and France. I do not see how it can be done in respect of a bus, when it cannot be done with a car. The Minister says a great effort is being made, but I think he should make it clear that it is the source of perennial embarrassment to have to say that although we have a shuttle service between Dublin and Liverpool, Dublin and Holyhead, Rosslare and Fishguard and Cork and Fishguard, we are still in the position that it is impossible to accommodate tourists' cars. Having said all that, I do not think it would be right to conclude without making it clear that in my experience Bord Fáilte is a co-operative body doing on the whole a good job. Mind you, I do not think it is fair to look down our noses and say that 90 per cent. of the tourists are our own people. I suppose they are, but, nevertheless——

Bord Fáilte do not bring them in.

No, but they do not keep them out either.

Of the money spent, £23,000,000 of the £42,000,000 is spent by genuine tourists—tourists in the narrow sense.

I think that on the whole Bord Fáilte is doing a good job. If half the tourists are coming to visit their relatives, the other half are of great importance and the more we get of them the better it will be. I think it is terribly bad that our advertising in Great Britain particularly, and in the U.S. also, should operate to draw people to the offices of Bord Fáilte unless these offices can be adequately staffed. It is a great mistake—and I want to emphasise this — to open scratch offices in rural towns in Ireland and put in them inexperienced staffs.

I have seen a case in a rural city where there is a quite attractive office of Bord Fáilte. Certain people of my acquaintance were anxious to travel from a particular area in the south-east of Ireland to Connemara. When they approached me, I said they were out of their minds to travel from that part of Ireland to Connemara, without taking two bites at the cherry. They came to me seething with indignation and said that they had met at the tourist office a nice little girl who said they could not get to Connemara from that place at all. It was a pretty adequate reply but it was not communicated properly.

If you want to travel from the south-east of Ireland to Connemara, you have quite a job on your hands but this is not the only part of the world where that happens. You will have the same difficulty if you want to travel from Cornwall to Birmingham or from West Durham to Somerset but it creates an unfortunate position if you set up a tourist office like that to which people go expecting to get expert advice only to be told that the people there know as much about it as you do and the best thing to do would be to inquire from the local stationmaster.

If you set up an official branch of Bord Fáilte in an area that does not justify the employment of highly skilled personnel you do more harm than good. Where you have these offices you should also have highly skilled personnel to meet tourists, to meet people who want unreasonable facilities. It is the unreasonable people who create trouble and one of the sad facts of public relations is that 100 satisfied customers never mention you afterwards but one fellow who imagines he has not been fairly treated will mention you ten times as often as the hundred who were satisfied. One dissatisfied person coming out of a Bord Fáilte office talks more than 100 people who have been adequately looked after.

Therefore, I think you cannot lay too much emphasis on the necessity of having properly trained staff in offices of this kind. That is not so easy to do but what is vitally important is to persuade the staff in the Bord Fáilte offices that if they have not got the information the visitor seeks they should never let that person leave the office without having gone right to the top to make sure that their inability to give him all he needs is not due to their own ignorance. It is vitally important that when people go to a Bord Fáilte office they should get whatever they want or else an explanation from a sufficiently experienced member of the staff to satisfy them that what they seek cannot be made available and that that is not for the want of the will but for want of the way.

I think, bearing in mind that one hears more of complaints than of anything else, that the facilities provided by Bord Fáilte are good. I have heard complaints from people who have come in contact with inexperienced personnel and, as a result, have been allowed to leave the offices with a feeling that they had been treated with something approximating indifference. That does much more harm than good and it is a danger against which we should provide. I would be interested to hear from the Minister what report he had from visitors who approached Bord Fáilte offices for information and advice as to how they could spend a holiday here.

The regional offices are run by the Tourist Association and not by Bord Fáilte.

Then it is high time that Bord Fáilte took the Tourist Association by the ear and told them that they should not set up these offices unless they have skilled personnel to operate them.

It is not Bord Fáilte that is responsible. It is the Irish Tourist Association.

When the Deputy has more experience of this House——

I have enough experience of the tourist industry to talk about it. You are criticising Bord Fáilte.

Bord Fáilte gave the money to the Irish Tourist Association so that they would have the right to check their efficiency.

The purpose of this House is to trace trouble to its source and to deal with it. Somebody is operating these offices and, to the average tourist, it looks as if they are branches of Bord Fáilte. That is what matters. When the tourist goes to a tourist office, he feels that he is going to Bord Fáilte. I find it hard to believe that an agreement could operate that we vote large sums of money to the Tourist Board and, at the same time, allow these offices to be operated by the Irish Tourist Association without trained personnel.

It is Bord Fáilte's responsibility to come to the Minister and tell him that this system is not working and that unless they can get skilled personnel into these offices harm will be done instead of good. I am not trying to censure anybody but I am trying to find out what is wrong. The Irish Tourist Association are not a body with a large staff of trained personnel such as the Tourist Board have. It is very understandable that a local body anxious to promote its own district should seek to set up an office quite unconscious of the fact that without skilled personnel they would be better off without such an office at all. If the Irish Tourist Association would approach Bord Fáilte in these matters we would have the assurance that the thing would be competently done and that the kind of difficulty to which I referred would not arise.

How useful it is to have discussions and find out what is wrong so that effective measures can be taken to put it right. I hope the Minister will consider the suggestions I have made to him. On the whole, I realise that Bord Fáilte are doing a good job and, as I say, in my experience, trying to help everyone who approaches them. They are prepared to listen sympathetically to any serious suggestions for improving the tourist industry. I think it is right on occasions of this kind to pay that tribute to them because if the obligation of commenting adversely upon them arose, I hope we would discharge it as faithfully. All criticism and no praise never got anyone anywhere.

I am glad to pay that tribute to Bord Fáilte and I hope they will take to heart what I have said about the canals, the boarding houses, pensions or guest houses or whatever you want to call them, and the information centres, which, in my opinion, stand urgently in need of reform.

I feel I should comment on what Deputy Dillon said about the information centres. I want to make it clear to the House that the Irish Tourist Association and Bord Fáilte are two different bodies. They help each other, and finance is given by Bord Fáilte on occasion to the I.T.A., but the I.T.A. are responsible for the running of the information offices referred to by Deputy Dillon. The people who run them are employed by the I.T.A. but, unfortunately, the I.T.A. are not in a position to pay them adequate wages and consequently do not get adequate staff.

We must not lose sight of the fact that the I.T.A. obtain their money more or less by scrounging all over the country, and particularly from the local authorities, some of which are generous and others not. I appreciate that Deputy Dillon was not attempting to ridicule—although I use the word "ridicule"—Bord Fáilte. I appreciate that it is necessary to have some adjustments made in the running of the tourist information centres because they are essential to the whole tourist business.

I notice that unfortunately a number of people are somewhat cynical about tourism and it is time we got away from that attitude. In my opinion, the importance of tourism to the nation's economy cannot be overstressed. Having said that, I also believe that we should not lose sight of the fact that it is a highly competitive business. In view of the fact that it is a highly competitive business, it is very important that we should gear ourselves properly to compete. We must not take the tourist business for granted. As a matter of fact, if we enter the Common Market, it might be one of the main answers to the problems that will confront us by way of industries shedding employees. While that is so, we must watch out for interlopers in the tourist industry. Far too many of them are coming into the catering industry and regard the catering industry within the tourist industry as "an easy cop", something that can be used to be milked dry.

I was somewhat intrigued by the suggestions made by Deputies on this Vote as to what should or should not be done in the matter of shortages of staff. There were suggestions that we should utilise students to help us out of our difficulties. I would not mind students being used if we could not get other staff, but I think it is essential that we should have competent staff and competent managers. Up to recently, very little care was taken in the training of managers for the catering industry. It sometimes happened that the person who moved into the management sphere of the catering industry was someone who had failed to become a lawyer, a doctor or something else.

While I say that, I appreciate that there are a number of competent young men training in hotel management, but the encouragement they receive is not very good. It is somewhat ironical to expect a young man to train to become manager of a Dublin hotel at £3 10s. a week and his keep, and gain the confidence of the people he is in charge of who have three times his salary.

During the debate there was a lot of talk about the standards to which we should aspire and the cuisine standards we should have. I think we should aim at having at least set standards, standards whereby we will display to all concerned that we in tourism know our job and are not setting out to cod the people. If we have that standard, we can provide for the simple as well as the elaborate person. I also believe that we should spend a lot more time in promoting Irish dishes. It appears that in the catering world and the tourist world the tendency on the part of the proprietors of establishments is to go over to French menus. I think that is very wrong. It is essential that our people should know French menus and Italian menus and know as much as possible about these types of dishes. A competent chef will be familiar with Escoffier, but at the same time, our people should be encouraged to promote Irish dishes. You do not travel miles and miles to get a meal you could get at home, and yet some people believe that if you do not provide foreign dishes, you are bad news.

Some time ago, an attempt was made to disprove that type of contention. In the city of Dublin a catering exhibition was held by interested people, workers and employers. French students were brought over to judge the exhibition and it was a proud moment for the Irishmen when they were told that all the items were first class. It was also said that there had been one significant mistake which was that they had indulged in French cuisine instead of Irish. The French experts pointed out that with perfect vegetables, perfect meats, perfect game, and all the other requirements, there was no necessity for us to camouflage our products.

I believe that if we are to make the progress which we should make, or if we are to maintain the progress already made, if at all possible, the Minister should arrange with his colleague, the Minister for Education, to have some lessons introduced into school curricula dealing with tourism and its importance. I also believe that we should invoke the aid of the technical schools, some of which are being utilised in that regard at the moment in some places and not in others.

During the course of the debate, suggestions were made as to what we should aim at and what type of person we should aim to bring into the country. Above all, I believe we should not ignore the English working man who has a penchant for saving for holidays and who, having saved, has what is called a "beano" and spends it. He behaves as if he were the manager of the establishment in which he works. He lashes it out and is found to be a man who looks after himself on the occasional holiday he takes, and can be very advantageous as a customer of any hotel in the country. Similarly, we are inclined to ignore the English middle-class people and concentrate too much on the Americans. The Americans we seem to get now are the poor type, those who give more bother than it is worth, the fellows who come on package deals and expect everything in the package. They pay for these holidays on the never-never system and it is unfortunate that some of those so-called Americans are people who once lived in this country, emigranted and made good over there. They come over here for a holiday and lord it over the people here.

As regards grants for hotel improvements, it is being suggested that more attention should be given to the smaller hotels. I believe we should get away from this business of front. We seem to be anxious to put on a front of pretence. It is rather significant that there is little or no difficulty if any hotel wants a grant for a lounge bar or to improve the restaurant proper but, up to the present, there is no provision to my knowledge for grants to be given to improve the back of the premises, the staff quarters, for instance. It is very important to provide the staffs in these hotels with ample, decent accommodation. These staffs are becoming more important daily having regard to the importance of the tourist industry.

There has been some talk about what should be done by way of extending tourist business and it has been suggested that we should promote different attractions. I believe each area should devise its own winter attractions with a view to lengthening the season. That is the real trouble. It has resulted in our being unable to build up a sufficient number of competent catering workers for the industry. Very often, particularly outside Dublin, a girl or young man who spends a season in one of these hotels, gets to know something of the business and then goes away at the end of the season to England, Scotland, Wales, America or Canada and we never see them again. That seems to be one of our greatest difficulties. I sincerely hope that we shall get down to this problem of lengthening the season.

I was intrigued by Deputy Dillon's remarks on fishing when he suggested that at the end of the fishermen's day we should lay on T.V. for them. If I know fishermen—and I know quite a number who come here and who live here—what they like to frequent is a pub. They do not want to watch T. V. "The one that got away" is a more interesting topic.

And lengthen public-house hours.

They like to go to pubs with sawdust on the floor.

I was also intrigued by the remarks made on coarse fishing. Great credit is due to Bord Fáilte for the way they have developed coarse fishing. We may not be completely satisfied with what they have done but they have made wonderful progress. It is amazing how these things come about. About four years ago a group of Irish waiters and chefs went to England for an exhibition of Irish cooking and Irish coffee. They won praise from the newspapers and they interested the then Minister for Lands—the present Minister for Transport and Power, I think—and got a 20 minutes item on I.T.V. I do not think we had to pay for it. It was a simple effort, people just going out and demonstrating their ability and other people taking notice of it.

I agree wholeheartedly with what Deputy Dillon said in regard to canal fishing and the utilisation of canals. It is a great pity that C.I.E. sold the canal boats which could have been fitted up into a type of luxury fishing boats for tourists of the type that come from England and France. I agree with everything Deputy Dillon said about the car ferry service. I understand the Minister is in difficulties and that he has done his best about this matter but, perhaps, if we cannot do anything about the sea, we might be able to do something by subsidising our air ferry service. I do not know what progress has been made in that regard or if there is any comprehensive plan in existence about it.

We should also pay attention to the lack of a large concert or conference hall, particularly in Dublin. We have lost many a large conference because of our inability to house people in conference. We have been ashamed to see in other cases the breaking up of these bodies after we have put them into our biggest house and to see them going, half to one big hotel and half to another on the night of a celebration when the conference ends.

It is agreed that exhibitions and festivals are drawing-cards and we should, no doubt, encourage everybody to put on exhibitions and festivals so as to lengthen the season, but in some cases we have spent money year after year on festivals that do not bring visitors here. Would the Minister explore the possibility of giving Bord Fáilte more power in this direction, power to put on their own attractions? I have in mind a son et lumiere. It is done in most countries now. We have a very powerful history, one that could be well depicted in the media of light and sound. It is a costly item. Some interested people tried to do it here last year but the amount of money required was prohibitive, something like £30,000. They could not get a grant from Bord Fáilte, only a promise of a gurantee against loss up to a certain extent.

What is really lacking in the Board —I am not criticising them—is, I think, an ideas group to think out ways and means of attracting people to Ireland. That is something we must provide because every nation is catching on to the importance of tourism. Even in Iron Curtain countries they pay real attention to bringing in tourists. Some of us might never get out if we went there. If we are to take tourism seriously we must take catering workers seriously. The catering worker is the only worker in this country with the exception of those in the County Borough of Dublin who has not got a set of conditions laid down by the State in relation to his or her hours of working. If that situation is allowed to continue much longer we shall lose the very good people it is so necessary to hold here. Visitors to this country think Irish waiters and waitresses are grand people. They think they will never get back here on holidays to witness the charm of the Irish waiter and waitress. In other parts of the world, in France or America, the waiter or waitress is quite impersonal. We should not make it too easy for people to run Irish waiters and waitresses out of Ireland.

Bord Fáilte should be given power to deal with restaurant and café owners who overcharge. At the moment if a person is overcharged in a café or restaurant and if he writes to Bord Fáilte, Bord Fáilte will reply politely to the effect that they will do what they can. They may write a sharp note to the restaurant or café owner but that is all they can do. They cannot take any action to ensure that the person who complains will get his money back or say that the restaurant of café owner will have his registration taken away, because the restaurant or café owner is not registered in the same sense as hoteliers.

I was intrigued at the suggestions made in regard to looking after the guest houses. Indeed, some of the guest houses need to be looked after. If some of them are allowed to continue they will ruin our industry. I have in mind the fly-by-night guest house. There are some guest houses on the quays in Dublin which offer rooms over restaurants and when the people go to them they find they are unfit to stay in. They do not get their money back and they have no redress. I notice also that this Estimate refers to Cork Airport. I am somewhat disappointed there is no provision for improving the kitchen facilities at Dublin Airport.

That does not arise on this Estimate. We have already had a tremendous debate far beyond the ambit of the Estimate but I cannot deal with Dublin Airport.

I have mentioned it, anyway. Taking everything into consideration, I think Bord Fáilté is doing a very good job. We are too prone to criticise Bord Fáilte instead of criticising ourselves. We should ask ourselves what contribution we are making individually and collectively towards building up the tourist industry. I appreciated the Minister is only a short time looking after tourism. It is a good thing to have a Minister directly responsible for the operation of tourism because it is recognised as being second in importance to agriculture.

Like the last speaker and Deputy Dillon, I wish to comment on this question of cross-Channel transport for cars. I am in full agreement with both speakers that some effort should be made to have cars transported to this country at a reasonable rate. I appreciate it is a big problem and it will probably take some time to meet it. However, there is one point the Minister could look into in the meantime, that is, the question of self-drive cars. I do not know if the Minister has had an opportunity of looking into the provincial and daily papers in Great Britain and, I understand, the United States, where we find self-drive cars advertised as being available to the tourists when they arrive in this country. I do not intend to criticise firms of repute; there are firms of repute who are doing a wonderful job. I am referring to those men who are advertising at cut-throat prices. I am speaking from experience. I know Irish people residing in Britain who return here for Christmas, Easter and summer holidays. They have procured self-drive cars as the result of advertisements in provincial papers in Britain, an accident occurs, and the first thing they find is that there is no insurance. Therefore, if the car is damaged they lose their deposit, number one; very often there is no insurance for passengers in the car, the only insurance in some cases being for a maimed driver. There is no mention of those facts in the advertisement in relation to the self-drive car and now the bureau has to come to the aid of people maimed in accidents by cars such as these.

The Minister for Transport and Power should step in and compel all self-drive car companies to register with him, and a condition precedent to the registration should be that their cars are of a certain standard and carry a certain insurance cover. Pending the righting of the wrongs pointed out by Deputy Mullen and Deputy Dillon in regard to the transport of cars, something could be done here. Self-drive is becoming very popular and rightly so. It gives an opportunity to tourists to see the country, to go into the byways, off the beaten track, and to use cars which are in common use in the country, not the large American limousines which are too big for our roads. We could go a long distance if Bord Fáilte took over the advertising—at a fee, of course—of these self-drive cars, or if the companies concerned were compelled to register with them as a condition precedent to their going into the market.

I would strongly recommend the Minister to look into the matter. A section of the Road Traffic Act will be coming into force on the 1st of May in respect of insurance and it might be an opportunity for the Minister to co-ordinate, before the present tourist season opens, the activities of his Department with those of Local Government and Justice in ensuring that the cars coming on the road for self-drive would be cars of a reputable standard and with proper insurance. We have gone a long way in the matter of reciprocal arrangement with other countries for exchange of driving licences. That has done a considerable amount of good and has eliminated a great deal of red tape. We can go further. I hope the Minister will look into this matter pending the settlement of some cheaper method of transporting cars by sea or air.

I do not wish to decry the Tourist Board in any way. In my first speech as a Minister of State at a tourist development dinner in Bundoran I suggested that the three tourist organisations of that day should marry and that there should be one organisation governing tourism in this State. We did abolish one of the organisations in existence at the time, which left us with the Tourist Association and the Tourist Board. Serious consideration should be given to a second marriage in so far as they are concerned. It is quite possible that the Tourist Board could utilise the personnel of the Tourist Association, which is mostly a voluntary organisation, and form one body governing tourism.

Deputy Dillon had to be corrected by Deputy Mullen as to the duties of the Tourist Association. There are Deputies who cannot distinguish between the duties of the Tourist Board and the duties of the Tourist Association. If we cannot distinguish between them, how can the Irish public or the tourist be expected to distinguish between them? The Minister should consider a marriage of these two organisations and having one organisation governing tourism.

As I said at the outset, I do not wish to criticise the Tourist Board for their activities. I remember some nine years ago saying in this House that I would advise them to look East instead of West for their business and their trade. At that time we appeared to be concentrating on America for the tourist industry. I thought it was foolish and I said it in this House. I repeated it on three different occasions during discussions on Estimates of the then Minister for Industry and Commerce, and I repeat it now. I do not think the American tourist is the advantage to this country that he is made out to be. I see now where such tourists have been going to see Killarney by helicopter. They have not time to wait overnight. They want to have a look at it by helicopter, purchase a few, possibly valuable, souvenirs in the duty-free airport at Shannon, and leave. We are not decrying them; I do not wish to decry them in any way but they are not the attractive tourist that we should try to get.

Deputy Mullen is right, and I have said it many times, that our eye should be on the working-class and the middle-class of Great Britain and the Six Counties. They are the potential money spinners and money spenders as tourists. They have certain blood connections, and other connections, business connections, with us and we are quite close to them with the strip of Irish Sea in between.

I remember advising the Tourist Board several times to open tourist centres in the various cities throughout Britain and suggesting that they should do what the various British seaside resorts are doing, that is, having Yorkshire Wakes and attracting tourists to certain centres for the period of the Yorkshire Wakes, the Lancashire Wakes and the Scotch Fairs. They should try to attract tourists to the north of the country from Scotland and Northern Britain and to the south of the country from southern and central England. We should not be afraid to descend even to what the Parliamentary Secretary to the Taoiseach described as the "despicable raffle" in advertising our seaside resorts. We should make prizes available in centres, if necessary, for the purpose of attracting people to seaside resorts.

If we are to set the middle class and the workingman as our tourist target, there is not much use in concentrating on the super hotels that are going up throughout the country. We have to concentrate on the smaller hotel and the guesthouse. I shall not deal with the type of guesthouse in the City of Dublin to which Deputy Mullen referred. I know that what Deputy Mullen says is correct but I cannot go into that. I refer to the guesthouse and, if you wish, the boarding house and the smaller hotel in the smaller seaside resorts.

Theoretically, Bord Fáilte are at liberty to make grants to guesthouses and smaller hotels to improve their amenities. I wonder has any Deputy the experience of applying to Bord Fáilte for such a grant? I have. I applied to them on three different occasions for grants for small hotels to improve their amenities. We provided architects' reports and all the information they sought but if we were to carry out the repairs they suggested it could be done in only one way, by pulling down the structure and starting all over again. Instead of building a guesthouse or small country hotel we would have had another luxury or super hotel in an area which could not cater for the class for which such an hotel would be suitable.

I know another case where a very good hotel in provincial Ireland, some three or four years ago, applied for a grant. They were being put off by the usual red tape until eventually they became exasperated. An official of the Board called and said, "We know you have done everything but, unfortunately, all moneys voted to us for this year have been absorbed in the building of hotels in the south of Ireland."

He was referring to the luxury hotels in Clare and Limerick but particularly in Kerry. The unfortunate applicant had to wait until the following financial year to procure what I would call a reasonable grant.

There are places where luxury hotels may be necessary. I have no objection to luxury hotels in the immediate vicinity of Shannon. If Kerry is to become a playground for American millionaires, let us try to extract a few thousand dollars out of their pockets by building a few luxury hotels but do not let us do it at the expense of the middle-class and workingclass English tourist whom we are trying to attract. I would appeal to the Minister to ask Bord Fáilte to concentrate more on giving grants to smaller hotels and guesthouses.

They are giving them.

Has the Minister ever tried to get a grant from them?

I have the figures of what they give.

Will the Minister put on record the counties to which grants have been given for the improvement of small hotels?

I have the figures for what they give. The Deputy is wrong.

I am not concerned with the figures. I am giving the Minister the experience I had in three cases in which I personally applied for grants.

The Deputy was unfortunate.

He may have been but I am afraid there are many other Deputies who were unfortunate also. I am not suggesting for one minute that one had to kick with a political leg of any particular length in order to get a grant. I do not wish to make that suggestion. If I put down a question to him will the Minister publish the number of applicants who have received grants for the improvement of hotels in the various counties and will he set out the tourist counties to which these grants have been given?

That would throw more light on the subject.

We have not a bad means of transport to our seaside resorts while we have the railways. Railways radiated from the centre of this city to all the popular seaside resorts.

The question of C.I.E. does not arise on this debate——

I was about to point out the question of transport does not arise.

——and I will not discuss it.

I am not talking about C.I.E. The Minister should not anticipate. He knows he has made such a botch of C.I.E. and he holds up his hands in horror every time it is mentioned.

I am very proud of C.I.E.

The Deputy is very serious this evening.

If the Deputy were to stay in the little seaside resorts around County Dublin and not pay periodic visits here, we would get on very well without him. He should settle a few more strikes and let us get on with our work.

I am not attacking C.I.E. I am attacking the principle that permitted C.I.E. or any other railway company —there are more than C.I.E.; there is the Londonderry and Lough Swilly company——

I am afraid this is not relevant on the Supplementary Estimate.

With the greatest respect, a Leas-Cheann Comhairle, I merely wanted to point out to the House that we had certain facilities for getting visitors to seaside resorts and these facilities were taken away from us, prior to giving us alternative facilities.

There is no money in this Vote for the reprovision of facilities and there will not be.

Surely we are dealing with the bringing of tourists to resorts.

Bord Fáilte have no money to re-provide facilities.

Bord Fáilte give grants for tourist roads?

On a point of order, Sir, this does not arise on this Estimate.

I have already pointed out to the Deputy that this matter does not arise and that this debate must be confined to the various subheads in the Supplementary Estimate.

Very good; I accept the ruling of the Chair as far as that is concerned. Deputy Mullen pointed out the difficulty of retaining staffs in tourist hotels throughout the entire year. It is a very serious problem. We have no alternative employment for them during the winter months, and until we can extend the tourist season, it is most difficult. Hotels, with the assistance of the unions, train young men and make them ideal waiters; but the end of the season comes and these boys have to clear off to Britain or some other industrial centre to seek alternative employment. The next season starts and we find the hotelier taking on boys by trial and error until he eventually finds a staff.

A story is told about a hotel in a seaside resort at the beginning of the season. It had just opened and a tourist called for afternoon coffee. The waiter asked him did he want black or white and he said he would have it half and half. The waiter did not know whether he wanted half in the cup and half in the saucer or what exactly he meant. I am telling the story to show that the hotelier at the beginning of the season has to take on these untrained boys and dismiss them if they are not successful.

We should do something to try to retain the trained personnel throughout the year. I know a hotelier in Achill—I am not here to advertise any particular hotel—who found the same difficulty. His solution was to build a cinema opposite the hotel and retain his staff as usherettes in the cinema during the winter months. It was a display of initiative on his part, and he has been able to retain probably one of the finest staffs in the West.

I have often thought that the Minister, by liaison with his colleague, the Minister for Defence, might have been able to do something in this matter. Chefs are most difficult to procure. It is a very highly skilled profession and one cannot expect a chef or a trainee chef to remain out of employment for six or eight months of the year. If catering schools were established for boy apprentices in the Army, where during their basic training they could be leased out as trainees to the hotels during the summer, we might solve this difficulty. These boys, on discharge from the Army, would be eligible to join a catering union and become permanently occupied in the catering business. It is something the Minister might look into as a method of solving this problem.

Having got our tourist to the seaside resort and having provided him with a comfortable hotel, and, possibly, good food, we have to go a little further. We have to cater for his entertainment and wants, particularly during inclement weather. We have also to give him the facilities to keep in contact with the business he has left behind. One of the essentials in a seaside resort is a public telephone.

The Minister for Transport and Power would have no jurisdiction.

With the greatest respect, he has the ear of his colleague.

The Deputy will have the ear of his colleague on another Estimate.

And he will tell me he has nothing whatever to do with tourism. I am referring to tourism and some of the amenities which Bord Fáilte could provide.

I shall have to rule the Deputy out of order on this.

If you do, I bow to the ruling of the Chair. Perhaps the Minister might anticipate what I was going to say and might look into it. I hope I am not anticipating the Chair when I refer to the licensing laws.

I am afraid the Deputy has anticipated the Chair. I have already ruled out references to the licensing laws.

I am afraid, again with great respect, a Leas-Cheann Comhairle, this confirms the conclusion I came to a long time ago that the Minister for Transport and Power has nothing to do with anything in this State. If we discuss C.I.E. he says: "I have nothing whatever to do with it." If we discuss Bord Fáilte, he says: "I merely provide the money".

I discussed C.I.E. for an entire week with the Deputy. He should not talk nonsense.

I cannot recollect.

On another occasion.

The only thing I can recollect is this. In so far as C.I.E. are concerned, I am aware that the Taoiseach before the last election said no more railways would be closed without the consent of the parties concerned and he broke that promise.

The question does not arise on this Supplementary Estimate.

The Minister begged the question and I had to give him an answer.

With regard to fishing, I come from a tourist county in which about 70 per cent. of our brown trout and sea trout fishing and about 30 per cent. of our salmon fishing is free — there is no charge. We have some very good salmon rivers privately owned. The worst landlord we have is the Minister's colleague, the Minister for Agriculture. He owns one of the best rivers in Donegal, the Owenea in Glenties. He took it over from the previous owners. It is now State property. Some few years ago, when Deputy Dillon was Minister for Agriculture, he displayed initiative by letting the river to the local angling association for a sum of £400.

That is a matter for the Minister for Lands, as I know well, having been in charge of that Department.

When once you begin to scratch here——

If the Minister disclaims responsibility for the matter, the Deputy may not proceed any further with it.

I am suggesting how the fishing industry might be improved as a tourist attraction. The Minister would do a great deal for tourism by insisting that his colleague should let the rivers he owns to local angling associations.

That is a matter for the Minister for Agriculture.

It is a very important matter from the point of view of tourism.

The Minister for Lands is responsible for that.

Fishy stories!

The shooting season opens on 1st September at the end of the ordinary tourist season. From that date up to 1st January, we could attract tourists here for shooting. What is being done to restock our mountains with the traditional grouse? Grouse are fast disappearing. Not so very many years ago, Donegal grouse shooting was one of the major attractions of the county.

The restocking of our mountains is a matter for another Minister, and not the Minister for Transport and Power.

I am talking about tourist attractions, or perhaps tourist distractions.

The restocking of mountains with birds is a matter for another Minister.

Birds are always an attraction to the tourist—birds of any description are an attraction. I am suggesting a method whereby the Minister could create more attractions for the tourists. We are not permitted to import either grouse or eggs. We are afraid of fowl pest. The wild duck, the widgeon, the teal, the mallard, the grey goose, and other varieties of wild goose, fly in here. They may drop on the lakes or moors of Scotland on their way. It has never been suggested that they bring in fowl pest. If it is suggested that we should import a few grouse from Yorkshire or the Highlands, the Government hold up their hands in holy horror and talk about the infestation of fowl with disease.

That is a matter for the Minister for Agriculture. It has nothing to do with me.

I feel the Deputy is in order in raising it. It could arise under subhead MM.1— Grants for Administration.

The Minister had a good deal to say some years ago on the fish ponds he was establishing throughout the State. I have often wondered if these were a tourist attraction or for the purpose of procuring fish for gourmets. I never could make out what the real purpose was. Will the Minister tell us how many fish ponds have been erected for farmers?

Fish ponds are under the administration of the Minister for Lands. They have nothing to do with tourism.

The matter is not in order on this Vote. It is a matter for another Minister.

We are dealing with subhead MM 2. These are grants to Bord Fáilte to defray the cost of schemes——

But they are not grants for fish ponds for farmers.

If the Minister will bear with me for a moment. They are grants to defray the cost of schemes for the development of holiday accommodation.

The Deputy is just wasting the time of the House with this kind of talk.

It might be worth the Minister's time to listen to it. I hear a great deal of talk about grants for the development of seaside resorts. I should like to know how much has been spent since 1956 on the development of seaside resorts in Donegal. A great deal of money has been promised. A considerable sum has been promised to Bundoran. Many schemes have been sanctioned. They are still waiting for the money. What is the reason for the delay?

Grants for the administration and general expenses of Bord Fáilte—I could say a great deal on that but I shall refrain. I shall be charitable. I have never heard of Bord Fáilte throwing a cocktail party in working-class clubs in Glasgow, Liverpool, Manchester, or London. I have heard of Bord Fáilte at the Adelphi in Liverpool, the Dorchester in London, the Waldorf Astoria in New York. I should like to hear of them going to working-class clubs in London.

Are they afraid to advertise it in the newspapers?

They publish it locally.

What does the Minister mean by locally?

In the area in which they hold the party.

We can read in our papers here of functions to which dignitaries and the Upper Ten in Great Britain are invited and we see photographs of these people with glasses in their hands, glasses with pink gin or dry wine. I should like to see photographs of Bord Fáilte officials in a working-class club, with the people holding a pint of Guinness and the suggestion that there is no Guinness like the Guinness consumed in the country of origin. I should like to see more money spent on that type of advertising in the industrial cities across the water. That would do a great deal to attract the kind of people we want to fill our smaller hotels, our boarding houses and our guest houses.

We are dealing with schemes for the development of holiday accommodation. The lounge bar and the ordinary bar form part of the amenities a tourist expects to find in a tourist resort. We should try to keep them open a little longer.

The licensing laws are not relevant on this Estimate.

I am referring not to the laws but to the actual accommodation provided and the length of time that accommodation is left open.

That is not the responsibility of the Minister for Transport and Power.

Amenities for tourists.

I am afraid to discuss it as an amenity for tourists because the chances are I shall be ruled out of order again.

It may be an amenity for tourists but the Minister has no responsibility.

But the Minister is seeking this Supplementary Estimate for the purpose of developing schemes for holiday accommodation. I am only trying to give him schemes whereby he may improve the holiday accommodation. Surely, with respect, Sir, I am entitled to suggest schemes for the improvement of the holiday accommodation? One of the schemes I am suggesting is longer hours in these places of refreshment.

That would require legislation and it is not in order to discuss legislation on the Supplementary Estimate.

I quite agree. It might require legislation and it might not. We had these amenities in the past as a result of the Nelson eye. It might still be possible for the Minister to ensure that the Nelson eye would be used, or rather not used. While Dublin certainly may be looked upon by the foreigners as a tourist centre, it is not really a tourist centre. I think far too much money is being spent on attracting people to the city of Dublin. We decry the centralisation of industry and what we wish to see is the decentralisation by Bord Fáilte of the considerable amount of money which they spend on advertising the city of Dublin.

One of the greatest attractions here is our Horse Show in August. Bord Fáilte have spent a considerable sum of money advertising the Horse Show. I have gone through the figures since the War and I find that they have not attracted one extra visitor to the Horse Show. The attendance is static. One year it may be up by a thousand for the average during the week and another year it may be down, but it is mainly static. Bord Fáilte have not succeeded in attracting additional tourists to the city. One of the reasons is that there is no accommodation for them during Horse show week. I should like to see Bord Fáilte spend more time and money and do more advertising to attract tourists to the various tourist resorts, and I do not mean seaside resorts. We have other valuable tourist resorts in addition to seaside resorts and I should like to see Bord Fáilte pay more attention to them.

I read in the papers and in magazines of these farms to which the Minister objected to my referring, where the spawn of rainbow trout is procured. We have on Arranmore Island off the coast of Donegal the only lake in Europe in which rainbow trout thrive without being restocked. I have never seen a visitor coming to fish there as a result of something which he or she may have heard from Bord Fáilte.

Every lake in Tipperary is brimful of them. They are so numerous they even give themselves up to the fishermen.

And they are known as "Childers cod". They are so lazy and fat they would not rise to a fly. In China, every house has one of these ponds at the back door and the young fellow goes out with a pin and a worm and just pulls them out. That is the type of fishing Deputy Davern is used to. I am referring to higher class fishing.

You would have to exert yourself on the lakes.

I am referring to sporting fish. Here we have one of the finest tourist attractions in the country. The only lake in Europe in which rainbow trout have propagated themselves over the past 50 years without being restocked. Not a solitary line is given to them in the literature of the Tourist Board. There is far too much centralisation by the Board in its advertising and far too much money is being spent building these luxury hotels. I know I am prohibited from discussing roads. What tourist wants to go through this country on an autobahn? He wants to get off the main roads and to discover the little known beaches and the little byways. What effort are we making to attract him? Again, were I permitted to discuss it, I would discuss the cutting of hedges which would help the tourist to see the countryside but the rules of the House do not permit me to mention these matters and it is a pity, because they are tourist attractions. As I said before, this entire country is a tourist resort at certain times of the year. Let me conclude by asking the Tourist Board to go eastwards, to look eastwards and to pay less attention to the west. By that, I mean the other side of the Atlantic.

If we are to develop the tourist industry, we must, first of all, have a Minister who is prepared to take his courage in his hands. As far as I am concerned, and the people in the area for which I speak, we see no reason why we should have duplication. We have the I.T.A. and we have Bord Fáilte two overlapping bodies, one depending for its existence on State funds and the other depending for its existence on contributions from the local authorities. I see no reason why those two bodies should not be united in a common effort, and not have them at sixes and sevens as they are at present, both going in different directions while allegedly aiming at the same target. If we want to attract the tourist, we must give him, not the Atlantic ocean coming in and going out every day or the Irish sea on the eastern coast. We must make things attractive; we must give an inducement. Here let me congratulate the Hospitals Trust, together with the Racing Board, for sponsoring the greatest attraction in racing that Europe has seen. It will be held next June at the Curragh. To that event will come tourists from all over the world. They will fly into Shannon and Dublin and spend their time and their money in this country. For that, the Hospitals Trust and the Racing Board only are to be congratulated. We did not find the Irish Tourist Association or Bord Fáilte making any effort to sponsor such events.

I want to speak for the area from which I come. We are not a coastal county but we certainly have something to give. We have more to give in our area than any seaside resort in Ireland. We give something when nobody else has it to give. We can start off midway in September and, through October, November and right up to April, give the attractions to the tourist from England or America.

Some eleven years ago, by pure accident, I was responsible for bringing a party of American tourists to hunt in County Limerick. It started with four. They come and the numbers are increasing every year for the hunting season around Limerick. Bord Fáilte seem to forget that while hunting is more or less prohibitive in America it is thrown open for a sum of £2 or £3 a day in County Limerick. For that amount of money, a person is supplied with fine open country, guaranteed hunting and a first-class course.

Let me now move on to fishing. For some unknown reason, away back in 1927 or 1928 some brave got the idea of handing over the fishery rights of the Shannon to the E.S.B. The E.S.B. were founded to generate current—certainly not to control fishing. Since they have taken it over, they have ruined the fishing on the River Shannon.

Again, the Deputy is going far beyond the scope of this Estimate. The Minister for Transport and Power has no responsibility as to the control of the Shannon, absolutely none.

I am speaking of the fishing on the Shannon.

The Deputy is discussing the amenities offered to tourists. So far, I feel he is in order. A detailed discourse on the E.S.B. would not be in order.

I want to discuss the fishing on the Shannon. The impertinence of the Minister to interrupt——

I shall try to control this debate from ranging over the whole——

That is a nice reflection on the Leas-Cheann Comhairle.

The Minister is entitled to draw a matter to the attention of the Chair. It is for the Chair to rule.

I have no exception to take to the Minister's point of order, none whatever.

Prior to the erection of the weir across the Shannon at Limerick, there was a free flow of fish up the Shannon through Athlone and further up through the northern counties as well as up the tributaries. Since the erection of the weir at Limerick, something has happened which has not happened in respect of any weir erected in Europe. No fish pass is provided in the weir at Limerick. Therefore, from Limerick northwards, including the tributaries of the Shannon, fishing is controlled. It is controlled by whatever small percentage of fish the E.S.B. wish to allow to pass through the weir. That has killed the interest in that amenity of tourists and fishermen from Limerick up the whole stretch of the Shannon and its tributaries. I ask the Minister now at this late stage to intervene and to allow the fish to come through the Shannon, as happens in every other country.

I shall do nothing of the kind.

If the matter is one for the E.S.B. to decide, it is not relevant.

I am speaking about the fishing industry.

The Deputy is suggesting the Minister should approach the E.S.B.

I shall do nothing of the kind.

I am suggesting that, in order to attract tourists to come to fish, this step should be taken. You can fish in Ireland for little or nothing compared with other countries. Consider the fishing in England. Hundreds and hundreds of people sit along a canal bank, shoulder to shoulder, with a bit of rod and line. They remain there the day long. That is fishing as far as the Englishman is concerned. It is not the energetic fishing we are accustomed to here and about which those in England know nothing at all. Bord Fáilte have fallen down on their job by not bringing that point home to them.

From fishing, I shall now move on to shooting. From 1st October, you have one section of shooting and from 1st November, the other. Most of County Limerick is open shooting. There has been no word, no organising, no publicity about that fact in England. Shooting is absolutely prohibitive in England except for the privileged classes. It is thrown open to all and sundry in County Limerick. I appeal to the Minister to spend more time, energy and imagination on the advertising of these amenities throughout England.

I have passed through the majority of cities in England. What do you see about Ireland when you look along the platform? Very little. Go into the clubs at night. Do you see anything about the facilities in Ireland? Do you see anything there about the cheap hunting, fishing and shooting in Ireland? There is not a word about it. You will get a bit of an office stuck in a side street where you will be given bits of paper and pamphlets which will convey nothing. We have not got down to the root of the tourist industry. I should like to see teams of efficient men touring England and lecturing on the amenities we have to offer at such fair prices.

Now I come to hotels. I see no need for all this massive building for millionaires. Any American tourist who comes to this country will make sure he gets value for his money. Too much play has been made about American millionaires and I, like many Deputies who have spoken on this Supplementary Estimate, would much prefer any day to see tourists from England, Scotland and Wales coming here. They are the people who will spend money and if we want to encourage them to continue their visits, we must provide for them something exclusively Irish —something in our character, something individualistic, something they have not got at home. Of course I may not speak of the licensing laws here, but I would appeal to the Minister to spend more money in the cities and towns of Britain in a campaign to bring home to those people the facilities we have here and the low cost of these facilities by comparison with what they have to pay for similar facilities in their own countries.

I emphasise again the necessity to send teams of experts over there to publicise our amenities. Then we can say with hope that the tourist industry will pay off. It is no use anticipating a rich harvest from this industry if we leave it to individual effort as we do in the case of the West of Ireland in the matter of deep sea fishing. The people of Westport and Dingle are making great individual efforts with practically no help, except what they can get by pulling and dragging small contributions from Bord Fáilte. These are the things that attract people from outside; these are the things we need if we are to improve our tourist industry.

In the course of his speech, Deputy Mullen touched on the major points I intended to refer to. Accordingly, I should just like to make one or two points in support of his general statement. First of all, I would congratulate Deputy Mullen's and other organisations on the fine improvement brought about in the catering industry in Dublin. That has been reflected in improved standards generally in hotels in the city. On the other hand, I must make a strong protest against the prices charged in some cafés and hotels. Some of the proprietors of these establishments have come from the East and seem to have a cynical disregard for the capacity of customers to pay some of the prices they ask for very moderate meals.

Incidentally, while foreigners are mainly to blame for that position, some of our own people are at fault, too. I have had occasion, as most members of the House have had, to go to the R.D.S. for the Spring Show and the Horse Show and I have found that the prices charged there are appallingly high. I do not know whether Bord Fáilte have received complaints but I know people who have complained about the high charges while these events are being held.

Another point I should like to draw to the Minister's attention is the question of the grants given by Bord Fáilte towards hotel development. I referred to this last week during the debate on the Vote on Account, my complaint being that there is a tendency on the part of proprietors of hotels, who have been facilitated by substantial Bord Fáilte development grants, to put such hotels on the market at very enhanced prices. I do not know whether it is within the Minister's capacity to control that sort of speculation but I do say it is something which is not desirable from the point of view of the tourist industry or the good of the country.

I would appeal to Bord Fáilte to be more magnanimous, more generous, in relation to appeals made by local authorities for the development of amenities in their respective areas. I have in mind the disappointing experience of Dublin Corporation some years ago when they submitted suggestions for the development of Bull Island. They were turned down on the ground that the Island was mainly a resort for Dublin citizens. Nobody familiar with north-east Dublin could doubt that tourists coming to the city make use of hotels and other amenities in the area. I would ask the Minister to reconsider the position in regard to Bull Island. The Corporation are engaged in development work opening access to it but they could not hope to embark on large scale development work without outside assistance.

I should like to congratulate Bord Fáilte on the magnificient work they are doing for tourism. I do not share the view of Deputy P. O'Donnell that they are advertising Dublin exclusively. I have access to a large number of newspapers and journals, mainly cross-Channel papers and I frequently see attractive advertisements publicising Ireland—not a Twenty-Six County Ireland but an Ireland of thirty-two counties—and I know from contacts and from conversations with friends that officials have gone around and have displayed films showing the facilities and amenities we have to offer tourists. I think the board are doing a good job in helping to develop our tourist industry.

This has been an interesting debate and it has been on so lavish a scale that it may be unnecessary for me to say quite as much on the main estimate as I shall have to say tonight. It will give me more opportunity to speak on other aspects of my departmental work on the occasion of the main Estimate as almost the entire ground of the tourist field has been covered in this debate, even though this is only a Supplementary Estimate.

On the whole, the feelings of the House have been friendly towards Bord Fáilte and there has been a considerable amount of praise for their efforts to stimulate tourism. The directors and staff will be glad to read the debate because of the generous support given to their organisation. The only bitter note struck in the debate was that struck by Deputy O'Donnell who deliberately tried to convey the impression to the Irish people that Bord Fáilte would have nothing to do with anything but luxury hotels and that no money was spent outside Dublin. He made other charges which he himself knows were quite without foundation and which were, indeed, in direct contradistinction to speeches made by his colleagues on the Fine Gael benches.

I want to come now to the suggestions made, and the criticisms offered, all of which will be considered by the Department and by Bord Fáilte and to give as full an account as I can of the progress of Bord Fáilte. Deputy Corish asked how the figures for expenditure for tourists were arrived at. That does not come within the ambit of my Department but, it is very important for Bord Fáilte to have a correct method of assessment. Perhaps I could refer Deputies to an abstract relating to the number and expenditure of visitors to Ireland, and Irish visitors abroad, which is a reprint from the Irish Trade Journal and Statistical Abstract of December, 1959. They will find there a very detailed description of the method by which the figures for tourist revenue are compiled.

They are compiled largely on the basis of information given by the transport companies and a sample passenger card inquiry undertaken at eight day intervals in respect of persons entering and leaving the State.

The information gathered by these means is used in conjunction with the total passenger movement and in that way they estimate the expenditure in this country.

The Central Statistics Office has a very fine reputation, both in this country and abroad, and in their view, the final estimates of expenditure may be taken as reasonably firm. I do not think I need say anything more about the estimation of the value of the tourist industry except to ask Deputies who are interested in the fairly complex procedure by which that is assessed to read the reprint from the Irish Trade Journal in which they will find the full analysis of the methods used.

A number of Deputies questioned the extent to which Bord Fáilte succeed in bringing people who are not of Irish origin into this country. On the basis of the analysis given by the Central Statistics Office in 1960, the total income attributable to tourism was £42.4 million. This was 17 per cent. of our total external assets, indicating the great importance of the tourist industry. Of that £42.4 million, £23 million was spent by tourists in the strictly narrow sense, excluding those who visited relatives here or came for business purposes. The international definition of tourists includes those people coming to a country who are of the origin of that country. The expenditure here has been broken down in order to illustrate how far we are attracting people with no connection with Ireland to come here.

Again, using the term tourist in the narrowest possible sense, the tourists who came here in 1960 accounted for 697,000 of the 1,400,000 recorded visits. I think we should be realistic about the part that Bord Fáilte should play in attracting our own kith and kin to this country. While it is true to say that there is a tremendous inducement for people of our own kith and kin to come here for holidays as time passes, it would be very wrong to make the assumption that we should not encourage them to come back, pointing out to them the newer amenities and facilities and the pleasure they can have here. As time passes and as the industry grows, that part of the work of Bord Fáilte will become more and more important. It would be very wrong to assume that money spent in attracting our own kith and kin to return to this country would be ill spent. That is certainly true of people of Irish origin living in the United States. They have to cross the Atlantic at much greater expense. We are, however, bringing new people to this country in very large numbers, people who have not been here before.

Deputies Esmonde and Corish raised the question of the amount spent by Bord Fáilte on publicity and Deputy Esmonde suggested that we should make clear to visitors the uncongested character of our roads and the pleasant conditions of living in this country. In a recent year, out of £571,000 spent by Bord Fáilte, £290,000 was spent on publicity. The main accent in regard to tourist propaganda may be described in these words "Take it easy in Ireland". That is the general propaganda line in Bord Fáilte and the uncongested roads are particularly stressed in all the publicity. They also point out the hospitality people receive here, the matchless scenery, and there is a great deal of publicity given to the sporting opportunities, to hunting, shooting, fishing and the special festivals that take place here.

I should like to thank Deputy Esmonde for carrying a trunk full of propaganda to spread about the places he visits when in Europe. An example has been set by him which might well be followed by others who travel outside the country. In regard to the character of the publicity, apart from handouts, leaflets and pamphlets, Bord Fáilte maintains offices in London, Manchester, Glasgow, New York, Montreal and Paris and conducts a continuous and extensive campaign, including the distribution of leaflets, trade advertising, television and the distribution of coloured films. They also have a number of officers travelling through Britain and other countries visiting travel agents and arranging film shows and exhibitions and providing lectures to staffs of factories and offices and other groups with particular interests.

A very important part of their work is to sponsor visits by overseas journalists and travel agents. One of the most important functions of Bord Fáilte is to bring travel agents to this country so that they will see what they have to sell, and particularly in so far as they can, to bring to Ireland not only the heads of travel agencies but as many of the counter-clerks as they can, so that they will have an idea of what they are selling to the people. In many cases, they have never visited Ireland and know only what they read in the leaflets. That is part of a planned campaign which, as manager of a tourist agency for four years in Paris many years ago, I can say is, on the whole, run well by Bord Fáilte.

To give some examples of the magnitude of the publicity of Bord Fáilte, I understand they distributed literature last year at the rate of 4,000,000 separate individual items. It was quite a long time before we could really convince the people of this country that it was worth spending large sums of money on the tourist industry. It is interesting to note that the French Commissariat for Tourism spend annually more money on posters alone than the entire annual expenditure of Bord Fáilte, which indicates the very modest allocation we have for tourism and in connection with this Vote.

In reply to a great number of Deputies, Bord Fáilte are concentrating their publicity, rightly, on Great Britain because there the major market lies. The publicity reaches people of every income grade. The publicity of Bord Fáilte reaches the working-men's clubs, the angling clubs, and the workers' travel associations, and everything possible is done to stimulate travel by people of all income groups in Great Britain. More money is now being spent in the United States and a very small amount of money in Europe, but it is perfectly right that a great portion of the allocation on publicity should be spent in the neighbouring island. I can assure Deputies that is not lost sight of by Bord Fáilte.

A certain amount of publicity for special types of tourism is undertaken in Europe, particularly in connection with shooting and fishing. The number of angling visitors from France and the number of Frenchmen who come here to shoot snipe has grown remarkably in the past three or four years. A number of Deputies spoke of the importance of developing angling tourism and, as I was previously Minister in charge of fisheries and in charge of helping to develop inland fishing for the purpose of encouraging tourists as well as our own people to fish, I have, naturally, taken a very great interest in the work of Bord Fáilte who co-operate very closely with the Inland Fisheries Trust in this very important activity.

I do not think anyone can say there has been any neglect of the development of angling tourism. Expenditure in the recent five year fishing plan has totalled £250,000 and in that period the income from visiting anglers was approximately £3½ million and is now over £1 million per annum. I should say that coarse fishing has taken a very important part in that development. In 1958, it is reckoned that 4,700 people came here for coarse fishing. That number had risen to 12,500 in 1959, and to 16,850 in 1960. Deputy Dillon spoke of angling in my constituency. I managed to get the figures, for 1960, for Monaghan. There were some 1,400 tourist anglers in 1960 as compared with 300 some four years previously, showing a great development.

Deputies have suggested that Bord Fáilte do not promote tourism among the artisan and middle-income class. In fact, Bord Fáilte organisers go around the workingmen's angling clubs, railway angling clubs, and angling clubs related to particular towns. They have shown films in those clubs and they make sure that the members of the clubs know to what travel agency they should go. Considerable business has been arranged with a big organisation called the Workmen's Travel Association. The coarse fish angling campaign has brought many Englishmen of the craftsmen class to this country. As a result of coming here with their families, they will advertise not only the angling facilities of Ireland but the whole country as well, and we can expect more traffic of this type in future years.

It is interesting to note that a number of coarse fishermen have switched over to game fishing for part of their holiday. They had no idea of how cheap it could be. I believe it is equally true that game fishermen have been seen surreptitiously fishing for coarse fish, ashamedly to begin with, and openly afterwards. It is equally true to say that a number of fishermen who came here have tried sea angling for the first time in their lives. They came to fish for game fish or pike or bream. The general impact of tourist angling is extending enormously through the experience of people who came here.

If Deputies could see the full list of moderate-priced coach tours from Great Britain to here, they would realise that an appeal is being made to the middle and moderate income groups in Great Britain.

Has the Minister anything to say about the canals?

I have not yet reached the question of the canal. A very large number of tours from all parts of England by motor coach are arranged at prices of about £3 to £4 10s. per day, all inclusive, which as Deputies will realise, will appeal to people of moderate incomes. Those coach tours are constantly being extended.

A great deal of the success of bringing anglers here depends on the development associations consisting of most devoted people who work for no reward to themselves. They arrange bookings in their towns and help to list accommodation. They arrange for catering courses for people who are not accustomed to taking care of tourists and they also collaborate with Bord Fáilte and the Inland Fisheries Trust. They have their own publicity in Great Britain in the angling newspapers, and in many cases, they send delegations to Great Britain, and in some cases, they maintain a particular connection with a town in Britain and in that way they have helped to increase our tourist angling business.

The particular features of fishing that can be found in each area are, first of all, included in the main Bord Fáilte Angling Guide and, secondly, in local brochures for which Bord Fáilte give some assistance in the preparation. Wherever fishing is available in canals, I know from my own experience in the past, although I have not got the information here tonight, that the local development association includes canal angling amenities in their brochure and, through the films shown by Bord Fáilte and the Inland Fisheries Trust in Great Britain, Deputy Dillon can be certain that angling clubs in Great Britain know that in certain areas there is very fine fishing in the canals.

An effort is also being made to stock the canals with tench which are particularly suitable for canal waters. I think Deputies also know that a very large stretch of canal will be permanently maintained as far as we know in the foreseeable future, regardless of any action taken in respect of canals by C.I.E.

The development of game is, in part, the responsibility of the Minister for Lands and partly my responsibility to the extent that Bord Fáilte carries out publicity advertising game amenities. It has given some substantial help to the newly-established game councils on the assumption that, as the years go by, we shall gradually be able to develop a national game policy.

Bord Fáilte is also equally in touch with hunt organisations in the United States and gives information to travel agencies, especially in the U.S., in order to encourage people to come here and hunt. I mentioned that because Deputy Donegan stressed the importance of hunting as a winter attraction. Bord Fáilte includes hunting and other sport in their general publicity and at the same time maintains touch with hunt organisations wherever possible so as to encourage people to hunt here. I do not hunt, but I think Deputies will realise there are some difficulties. Many people abroad are not accustomed to our style of hunting and sometimes require a certain amount of experience before they become fully competent to hunt in our manner. That has been proved true by some of the very short week-end hunting tours that have been arranged and have not been successful because some experience is required before people from abroad become accustomed to our way of hunting.

I come to the question of hotel grants. Deputy Cosgrave suggested that hoteliers were sometimes deterred from improving premises through fear of incurring substantially increased valuation. I understand that premises that have been improved or extended are subject to increased valuation but qualify for two-thirds remission of rates on any increase for a period of from two to seven years. Taxation depreciation allowance includes an initial depreciation of 20 per cent. so that hoteliers can be encouraged to improve premises and promoters can be encouraged to build new hotels. The rating and tax allowances together offer them a reasonable chance of developing and extending hotels without too much difficulty.

Deputy Donegan said that the scheme of funding loans for hotels is preferable to the direct cash grant scheme as a means of encouraging hotel development. He also suggested that the interest-free period on loans should be extended from 5 to 16 years. I am not quite clear on what he meant by the "funding" of loans. The State does not advance moneys for hotel development works but the Minister can give guarantees in respect of loans raised by hoteliers in approved cases. The loans are lent in the normal way by lending institutions, usually the banks. In view of the Minister's guarantee, the interest rate of such loans is generally a little bit below the normal lending rate.

Bord Fáilte also gives grants which make guaranteed loans interest-free for five years and Bord Fáilte also makes grants which meet the greater part of the interest rate on loans secured otherwise than under the Ministerial guarantee, so that an hotel manager may borrow money himself without a Ministerial guarantee and get the interest paid on it for a number of years by Bord Fáilte. He can also get the interest paid for five years on money borrowed on State guarantee.

There are also grants for reconstruction of bedrooms and other hotel amenities. I think those grants are generous and that it would be unreasonable to suggest that the interest-free period of the loan should be extended from 5 to 16 years.

Deputy Tully spoke about assistance for holiday camps. They qualify for the same treatment as hotels as regards grant and loan facilities and tax concessions. Butlin's holiday camp have received substantial grant assistance from Bord Fáilte.

Assistance for private unregistered accommodation is suggested by some Deputies but I think Bord Fáilte were right in confining financial assistance to registered premises where there is a certain minimum standard. The guaranteed loans and interest grant schemes are available to all registered premises, including guest houses. A number of complaints have been made by Deputies to the effect that Bord Fáilte stress too much the incentives they offer to luxury hotels. First, the hotels classified as "A" by Bord Fáilte as distinct from "A plus" or "A-star" are not, in the international sense, luxury hotels. They are regarded as top-grade but not luxury hotels. The luxury hotel is confined to those specified as "A plus" of which there are not many in this country.

Deputies will be interested to hear the proportions of accommodation of the various classes in the country. Out of a total of 18,700 registered hotel bedrooms fewer than 5,500 are in the "A plus" or "A" class. By 1963, it is expected that we shall have 20,000 registered bedrooms of which "A plus" and "A" grades will account for about 6,400 rooms.

It has been suggested that Bord Fáilte are unwilling to assist in small extensions and improvement works and that this operates against the small hotelier or guest-house keeper. Deputy Dillon stressed the importance of assisting the small hotel keeper and guest-house keeper and at the same time suggested they should not be encouraged to go too far at once. I think the minima for the various schemes are fairly reasonable. The expenditure on improvement in accommodation required by Bord Fáilte for an hotel of any class or for registered guest house is as follows: bedroom grants should be for at least five bedrooms. If it is an improvement grant, the works should be to the value of at least £2,000. If a guaranteed loan is required it should be for at least £500 and if interest grants are applied for, it should be in respect of loans of at least £500. The assistance offered is reasonable on the whole and it certainly is not discouraging to the small hotelier or to the registered guest-house keeper.

The question was raised about advertising the simpler classes of accommodation even beyond those that are registered. There is a complete and separate list of the unregistered lodging-house accommodation in all the areas where angling tourism is a feature and there are supplementary accommodation lists that have been published by Bord Fáilte and widely disseminated in the right kind of circles for Achill, Galway, Salthill, Kilkee, Lahinch, Ballybunion, Dingle, Killarney, West Cork, Arklow, Greystones, Skerries, Bundoran, Buncrana, Moville, and Tramore. Lists for other places are in the course of preparation. That is in addition to the lists published particularly for the coarse angling and sea fishing districts. They cover accommodation for 10,000 people. No fewer than 947 private houses are listed and 132 houses are available for letting. 100,000 free copies are distributed and they include places where accommodation can be secured for as little as 12/6 for bed and breakfast and even in those cases there is a 50 per cent. reduction for children.

In order further to illustrate the extent to which Bord Fáilte is encouraging the improvement of B, C and guesthouse accommodation, I think the House should hear the figures. The total grants or loans covering the improvement or construction of hotels has been £3,350,000 and of that sum £1,250,000 has been for accommodation other than A plus or A grade hotels. The bedroom grants given so far total £527,000 of which £310,000 is for hotel accommodation of B class or lower. That indicates that although there is a good deal in the newspapers about the great luxury hotels going up, all the time good work is being done by Board Fáilte to assist hotels of lower grade. On such occasions as I have had the opportunity of speaking about the tourist industry, I have made it clear that we need far more B and C guesthouse accommodation. There are whole stretches of magnificent coast where there is practically no accommodation. Deputies from Kerry will know there are very few guesthouses or hotels in places I know well, for example the great and wonderful beach stretching along the southern shore of the Dingle peninsula around Annascaul and that area. There are many places of the same kind where accommodation in relation to the amenities is almost totally lacking. I hope now that the tourist industry is showing continued signs of growth, there will be more applications for grants or loans for the simpler type of accommodation. I have also told the Directors of the new C.I.E. hotel subsidiary that, in my view, they should now examine the whole question of how far they can provide B class accommodation in the areas where it is lacking and where they believe there is a tourist potential.

Deputy Leneghan made some strange references to what he alleged to be the futility of the Bord Fáilte operations in Achill. In Achill Bord Fáilte has been operating with particular success and the increase in the number of visitors last year as a result of the application of the June holiday plan to Achill has been very noticeable indeed.

Having pointed out that Bord Fáilte are not only issuing supplementary accommodation lists but encouraging improvement and construction of hotels for people of the middle and lower income groups, I should say it is essential that our hotel standards should improve and that, whatever Bord Fáilte do, a minimum standard should be insisted upon in regard to what can be included in any classification by them in regard to comfort, food and hygiene.

A considerable number of Deputies referred to different areas in which they are interested, and expressed the hope that Bord Fáilte would advertise their particular tourist area. The answer to that is that if Deputies will look at the local publicity privately promoted, the Irish Tourist Association publicity and the many leaflets provided by Bord Fáilte, they will see that practically every tourist area is well covered and in the case of Bord Fáilte in the general sense. But there is a tremendous need for far more regional publicity organised by private interests. Here again, may I repeat what has been stated by my predecessor and, I think, at the time of the Coalition Government, by every Minister in charge of tourism, that regional committees, associations and local hotels spend less money on developing tourism in their areas in proportion to the money spent by Bord Fáilte than any other country in Europe. That perhaps could be understood in the earlier period of our tourist development, but the lack of regional publicity on a very big scale is becoming more and more noticeable.

It is wrong to expect Bord Fáilte to go into every avenue, into every area. It is for the local people to create their own image of what they have to offer to the people who come from abroad. It is done all over Europe. You can go into the smallest villages in Britain where I am perfectly certain the people as a whole have no more general income than people here and you will find that those villages form their associations: you will find leaflets abounding. In hotels in other countries you will find a whole system of regional publicity worked out. We have not yet even attempted to adopt the principle of the chain hotel system in which the collaboration between hotels throughout Europe makes possible the dissemination of tourist literature not only by individual hotels but by chains of hotels of the same class either around the whole country or in a particular area. I should like to take the opportunity of congratulating the Chamber of Commerce in Galway for appointing a promotion officer for tourism in the area. I hope that example will be followed elsewhere. Bord Fáilte are paying for part of the salary of this promotion officer.

Other Deputies spoke of the necessity for providing amenities of various kinds, particularly in inland areas which will be of value to the tourist trade. I should remind the House that the new local improvement grants are available to recognised associations from the Minister for Local Government and they apply to improvements of the kind that would be of great value in the tourist industry, particularly in inland areas and in the areas where many people go to fish.

A number of Deputies referred to the effect of the present licensing laws on tourist resorts. That does not come under this Estimate. All I can say is that Bord Fáilte have made their point of view known to the Minister for Justice.

Deputy Donegan referred to the great potential of sea angling. Bord Fáilte have been making a tremendous effort to develop sea angling. There is still difficulty in obtaining a sufficient number of boats of the right kind and exactly at the moment when anglers want them. There is also, unfortunately, a dearth of accommodation in some of the most magnificent areas for sea angling. For example—I was reading one of the latest reports the other day—apparently, there is magnificent surf angling all around the west coast of Clare, underneath the burren limestone escarpments and there is surf angling in many other areas, but insufficient accommodation. Bord Fáilte are naturally concentrating their interest on areas where accommodation and boats are available and the number of foreigners coming here and the number of our own people who come to take part in sea angling competitions is constantly increasing.

The same thing applies, I think, to the growth in the number who come to play golf here. Aer Lingus have arranged package tours for American golfers and I believe that in turn has begun to attract people to this country because of the very fine golf courses we have here and golf courses which are still relatively unencumbered compared with those in many parts of Great Britain and the United States.

Deputy Cosgrave asked some questions about the comparative sea fares and rail fares on the Dublin-Cork route. The only air fare that was changed was the return air excursion fare, which was increased from four guineas to five guineas. I felt that as the flights from Dublin to Cork and vice versa were, in the main, positioning flights and had to be undertaken anyway, to have cut-throat competition start between C.I.E. and the air service was anomalous in those circumstances. In reply to Deputy Cosgrave, I did definitely intervene in regard to the matter and on that ground.

Deputy Tully spoke about the necessity for encouraging interest in Irish games of every kind. Bord Fáilte have published a calendar of events covering sports of every description and all the main events taking place in the coming year.

There is a terrific number of omissions. They should have another look at it. It is very good but could be improved.

I do not suppose it is perfect. If there are omissions, that should be the subject of effort of a local development association and the hotel proprietors.

And Bord Fáilte.

Deputy Dolan spoke of the necessity for encouraging Irish entertainment in hotels. I have spoken about that on a great many occasions. Speaking at chambers of commerce on occasions related to the development of tourism, I have constantly asked hotels to arrange for Irish singing and dancing. I am glad to see that the practice is extending. Equally, I hope that when they are doing it, the standard will be reasonably good. There is no good in having people who are unable to sing well. We have a great many pleasant singers in this country. The practice should extend because thousands of tourists come here and never hear any good Irish singing at all the whole time they are here. There is no reason why we should not offer it to them because I know from people who have heard the Gael Linn cabaret that they are delighted and amazed by the variety of Irish songs. In every way, we should develop that feature of our tourist activity.

Deputy Dillon raised the question of the staff in a particular Irish Tourist Association office and other Deputies raised the question of whether we should not have another general amalgamation of the national tourist organisation. The answer to that is that there must be one association which reflects the interest taken by local authorities in tourism. The Tourist Association is financed largely by local authorities and, in order to encourage local interest in tourism, to encourage regional publicity and to encourage representatives of local authorities in the belief that it pays to raise financial aid from the rates. It is terribly important that the Tourist Association idea should be kept, at least, that there should be some organisation operating, spending the money of the ratepayers, aided by money granted by Bord Fáilte. To have it wholly paid and wholly organised from the centre by Bord Fáilte would be inadvisable under present circumstances. I admit that all these kinds of things are arguable and I would ask Deputy Dillon if he could let me have privately particulars about the place where the official was not up to scratch and I will ask the Irish Tourist Association to investigate the matter.

I have not had any complaints of poor service being given by those who work for the Irish Tourist Association. I have been in with some of them myself and have found them very pleasant, able to give a lot of information, and, when I asked as a matter of interest for very obscure information, I was told very politely that it simply was not within the ambit of their activities. They said so politely, did not try to make a game of it.

Surely the Minister does not suggest that the local authority is the only source of revenue for the I.T.A.?

No; they get grants from Bord Fáilte.

And also from other organisations.

They do get grants from other organisations. A number of questions were raised in regard to the provision of transport for cars. We increased the total space available for cars by 50 per cent. last year, and in one year, but I agree with Deputy Dillon that we still have a long way to go to improve the conditions of travel. We do hope for a proper car ferry service. I am unable to say whether that will materialise in the near future or not but at least the proportion of space has gone up and it was very fully utilised, so that we are making some advance in that direction.

Could the Minister tell us why is it that you can drive a car on to a boat and drive off in France and that it takes about five hours to get your car on to the boat if you are coming to Ireland?

The reason is that in Calais, Dover, for example, there are special embarking areas whereas in our case, in the congestion of Liverpool, for example, so far as I know, there is no possibility of making special spaces available or to create a special arrangement.

There is no congestion at Holyhead.

And then, of course, the numbers of people crossing over at any one time between the English and French coasts are enormous. But, as I have said, we hope all that will improve with time and every mortal effort possible is being made to persuade the various shipping companies and the railway company to improve the position.

Deputy Mullen made a number of interesting suggestions, with most of which I agree. In connection with what he said in regard to, for example, providing in technical schools technical courses that aid the tourist industry, that is already being done and I hope it will be extended. It would take me too long at this stage to comment on everything the Deputy had to say, except to say that I found his comment on the difference between French cooking and Irish cooking interesting because I agree that people should not attempt French cuisine unless they can really do it properly. On the other hand, I think he was going too far when he said that French cooking was merely a camouflage of cooking when the materials are not good.

You know why French sauces were invented.

I think there is a kind of balance between the two.

A famous King of France invented sauces.

They give grand names to simple things.

Deputy P. O'Donnell referred to the self-drive car business and suggested there were some crooks engaged in the business. I intend to ask Bord Fáilte what the present position is, how many complaints they have had and whether or not we should consider the registration of the self-drive car hire people. The best firms belong to an association where there are certain standards, including standards in respect of insurance. I know the association do their best to maintain high standards in this industry as a whole. I think the suggestions made by Deputy O'Donnell should be taken up by Bord Fáilte and I will ask them to investigate it.

Deputy O'Donnell also suggested we should make social contacts with particular English towns. I think I have already indicated in connection with coarse angling that a number of development associations have formed friendly relations with angling associations in particular towns and concentrated upon them. The Deputy suggested that the famous rainbow trout in a lake in Donegal was not anywhere mentioned in Bord Fáilte publicity. I think that the Angling Guide is almost certain to include the full particulars of the famous rainbow trout, but I may be wrong. However, I should like Deputy O'Donnell to make quite sure before he makes that criticism. I read the Angling Guide in considerable detail myself and found that it did mention all the special features in regard to fishing, and I can hardly believe it omitted the lake where, as Deputy O'Donnell says, rainbow trout live without the need for restocking.

Deputy Timmons asked a question about what happens when an hotel, built with the aid of Bord Fáilte grants, is sold at a much higher price, at a speculative profit. My information is that, in connection with the grants and assistance offered by Bord Fáilte, the hotel undertakes to maintain itself on the register for a minimum period. I presume that in the case of anybody who purchased the hotel that obligation would continue. Of course, there is no way in which Bord Fáilte could prevent the sale of an hotel in the ordinary way, but they do try to ensure that the building itself will be maintained as a registered hotel for a minimum period.

Deputy Timmons also suggested that Bord Fáilte might take part in the financial arrangements for the access to an island near Dublin. Bord Fáilte have already made arrangements for the major resort development of the country. They have cast their net fairly wide. They have provided or offered assistance in a number of areas scattered all round the country. I think they tend to concentrate on areas away from Dublin as being of major importance from the tourist point of view.

A number of Deputies spoke about measures to lengthen the tourist season. A great deal is being done in regard to that already through encouraging angling, shooting, hunting, and so forth. Also the June Holiday Plan appears to be succeeding very well. We shall have to consider, however, the very important matter of how far holidays can be staggered here in order that the tourist accommodation for Irish people and for visitors here can be increased over the whole period from April to October. That is a matter which is engaging my attention, particularly at the moment. There are many difficulties in connection with it. People are extremely conservative in their attitude towards holiday periods, but seeing the progress we have made in so many other aspects of tourism I can hardly believe we will not get co-operation from everyone concerned to extend as far as possible the holiday period, in particular co-operation from employer and trade union organisation. If we can do that we shall release a great deal of accommodation at the critical periods, all of which will result in a total increase of tourist income from abroad.

Does the Minister suggest the Irish people should take their holidays in April?

No; I was not suggesting that. I was saying we have an incentive to lengthen the tourist season and that we can consider the tourist season as being of very particular interest from April to September. I was suggesting that holidays should be arranged so that not everybody would be trying to take their holidays in the second two weeks of July and the first two weeks of August; and that if it could be spread out in either direction, it would be of advantage.

It is impossible so long as the school holidays are as they are.

I agree that is a problem.

This House keeps its own staff here in August. It keeps printers working all night in July.

Deputy Mullen raised the question of the necessity for a conference hall or concert hall in this country. That is something which is being studied. Until we can have international congresses of 1,500 here, we will not be engaging in the full sense in the international congress business. The whole of that question is under consideration at present. What the outcome will be, it is impossible for me to say now.

I think I have dealt with practically every point made by Deputies. Again, I thank Deputies for their constructive criticism. Anything I have not spoken of in my reply will be examined in the Department so that we can make quite sure that all the advice offered by Deputies will be studied to see whether or not we can do anything to forward the tourist industry. I should like again to appeal to Deputies finally to encourage local initiative, which has already been so successful in the fishing areas, and to encourage more regional publicity in every area. Whatever Bord Fáilte is able to provide in the way of monetary assistance, in turn derived from a Vote of the House, it will never be sufficient unless there is more regional effort made in every part of the country.

Does the Minister intend to make grants or attractive loans available to improve staff quarters?

That is the only important omission from my reply. I think it will be possible for Bord Fáilte to announce in the near future that the scope of assistance for hotels will be increased to include staff accommodation and facilities directly relating to the private entertainment of the guests in the hotel.

Having regard to the Minister's statement in relation to his intervention between C.I.E. and Aer Lingus in the matter of air and rail fares, would he be prepared to take the same initiative in the matter of bus fares?

That is an entirely different matter.

Would the Minister oblige me with some information? Under the subheads M.M.1. and M.M.2., there is approximately £91,000, which is to be additional to the provisions of subheads H.1. and H.2. in Vote 44—grants under Section 7 of the Tourist Traffic Act, 1955, and the development of holiday accommodation. Could the Minister give me a breakdown of that extra figure and, secondly, could he indicate under what subheads the savings of £210,000 are being made?

The savings were made in connection with various improvement works in the airports in which, because of delays of one kind or another, the work was not completed. The £91,000 is provided for Bord Fáilte.

Could the Minster give me a breakdown as to how much was provided between the Tourist Traffic Act and holiday accommodation?

The holiday accommodation is £19,500 and the grant under subhead S. 2 of the Tourist Traffic Act is £71,500.

Vote put to and agreed to.
Barr
Roinn