Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Wednesday, 15 Nov 1972

Vol. 263 No. 9

Committee on Finance. - Vote 42: Posts and Telegraphs (Resumed).

Debate resumed on the following motion :
That the Vote be referred back for reconsideration.
—(Deputy R. Burke).

I should like to make a few brief remarks on the Department of Posts and Telegraphs. The Minister referred to the 22,000 people on the waiting list for telephones. He does seem to have on his mind, not to say on his conscience, the fact that there are 22,000 people waiting for telephones. Not only in industrial and business circles is this something which reflects little credit on us, and does handicap those businesses, but also in the domestic field it makes a great deal of difference to people's lives, especially people in isolated places and elderly people, to be without telephones. The Minister almost made an apologia on account of the lack of money which he is able to get for capital expenditure. This lack of capital for telephones is something that he himself should remedy. He should make stronger representations to the Cabinet for more money. It reflects neither any great credit on himself nor on the Cabinet that they have not given this very vital money for capital expenditure. We all know that the demands on the Central Fund are great but, at the same time, the need for telecommunications is something which is a great deal more important than many other things.

Having said that, I should like to say that in the main the Department function quite well. One sometimes heard complaints of lack of attention or courtesy in post offices but I do not think that now exists to the extent that it used exist. I have never found anything but politeness and courtesy either on the telephone or in post offices and that is where the people were not at all aware that they were dealing with a Member of Dáil Éireann.

I should like to refer to the speech of Deputy R. Burke. Unfortunately I did not hear a good deal of it but I heard him make a contribution which has rarely if ever been made in quite the same way in connection with broadcasting and television. The strange inter-relationship between news and communications and the Government of the day—whoever they may happen to be—and morals and political opinions or opinions which sometimes border on the political, is a subject which has not been discussed as much as it ought to be either in this House or in this country. Deputy Burke did a very good thing in bringing out some of the difficulties and problems which lie in this particular field.

We have had some almost acrimonious debates here on the question of how far the authority were going against political opinion but they have been from a political point of view mainly and there is an enormous field which really is not political but has to do with our type of society and our treatment of public figures in it who come before the microphone and camera. I do not think RTE are at all the chief offenders in this way. Other broadcasting authorities do it to a greater extent than it is done here but one has seen important people with a national message to deliver being harassed by an interviewer who possibly held different ideological views. It is very difficult to speak on that aspect in this House. It is more a subject for lectures at university or other teaching levels. The public have to be protected against individuals who are broadcasting, even newscasters, slanting these things to suit themselves. This comes out mainly when there is an attack on the Government. The Government react violently. We must remember in this regard that the important thing here is that those broadcasters are attacking our institutions.

This happens to a greater extent in other broadcasting authorities. We get a welter of politics when a political figure is attacked or harassed by a broadcaster. We forget that it is only opinions which are put forward, which may not necessarily be the absolute truth. When individuals speak on some of those programmes they do harm to themselves as well as to the cause about which they have been asked to speak. This matter must always be closely looked on by the RTE Authority. At the same time they must not stifle genuine discussion.

We will probably always have a situation like this in the RTE Authority and it must be faced. It is very important to understand that it is only opinions which are being put forward. This has a greater impact on the public when it is a television interview. Deputies here must help in this regard by trying to see that fair play is given to everybody who appears on a television programme.

I would now like to refer to the RTE Orchestra which belongs to both radio and television. It is a very fine orchestra which has been built up over a number of years. In the view of competent critics it is improving all the time. The RTE Orchestra has an international reputation of a high order. I would like to see it appear more on television. We get it very often on the radio. I am aware that it is not always glamorous to watch somebody playing an oboe or the cello as the sideways movement is not always very graceful. I notice when the orchestra appears on television that the camera moves away very quickly from such instruments. They prefer to show shots of the harp. This is a very beautiful instrument and is lovely to watch. It has to be handled gracefully. The camera usually keeps away from the trombone and some of the wind instruments. A good orchestra is worth listening to and we should see the RTE Orchestra appear on television as often as possible. My wish is that we get more of it. It pleases me greatly to know that the Radio Éireann concerts are supported so well in Dublin and I expect they are strongly supported in the country also. These concerts which are given at the Gaiety are very good and the number of young people who attend them is an indication that music is not the prerogative of a music élite or of any particular age group. Music appeals to citizens of all ages. From reading the papers one realises how much the orchestra is appreciated, too, when it visits centres such as Cork and Limerick.

The help given towards the Wexford Festival is greatly appreciated not only by the people of Wexford but by music lovers from many other places. In these difficult times for our country, when certain sporting events and other meetings have been cancelled because of unnecessary fears, musicians, who one might regard as being rather timid people, flocked to Wexford as usual. Music is carrying for Ireland one of the finest flags that can be carried and one of which we can be proud. I hope that support for the orchestra will always be given. We have heard grumbles from time to time concerning the cost of supporting it but it is a living thing and is as necessary to the cultural life of our country as is our National Gallery and museums and it does not cost a tremendous amount of money.

I should like to turn now to the question of piped television. I noticed yesterday evening that the Minister refused to be drawn on the number of pylons that had been erected throughout the country and around Dublin. I doubt whether he would answer me either if I were to ask him how many have been erected and how many of those erected are in use. I have been told that they have been erected in strategic places so as to prevent commercial concerns choosing these sites. Therefore, there would appear to be a type of dog-in-the-manger attitude; but I hope that is not the case because if people anywhere on the east coast are prepared to erect good aerials, they can receive at least four stations. Therefore, piped television will not have the effect of preventing people viewing the programmes on other stations. In any case it would not be in the national interest to do so. As one cannot build a paper wall around this country, neither can one build a negative electronic wall around it nor is it in any way desirable that that should be done.

Irish nationalism, and by that I mean true nationalism and not the flag-waving type of nationalism, is a plant of stronger growth than merely preventing people from watching the programmes of television stations other than our own. Some of these programmes are viewed for their cultural content while some of the comedy programmes that we see on these other stations are excellent.

Piped television would bring to many people a type of trouble free viewing which for people in certain areas is difficult to obtain at the moment. That goes for RTE also. I am aware of the existence of a pylon which is only a few hundred yards away from a place I know very well. It stands in the grounds of a convent in Mount Merrion but there is nothing either going into or coming from it. I do not know its exact height but it would be capable of permitting superb reception to many people in that area. When I tried to raise this matter earlier I was told that the Minister had no function in the day to day administration of the authority. That is a type of parliamentary cliché because one might ask if he has not any such function, who has? I hope the Minister will look into this particular matter in which Deputy Burke is as interested as I am. Regardless of what the RTE people who conducted a survey in the area may say, I know there is a demand in Mount Merrion for piped television. I hope that piped television will be increased generally. Apart from any other consideration, it would be the means of saving many roofs and would improve greatly the skyline.

There is another matter which I cannot discuss here but which I will put in this way: lest anyone be foolish enough to try to interest the Minister in broadcasting the proceedings of places which do not come under this Vote—it might be guessed that I am referring to this Chamber—I can be counted out. For almost 30 years I was a member of Dublin Corporation. Although that body has been the subject of many attacks it was a very fine body and was staffed by very fine officials. I understand its difficulties and I know its weaknesses. The real work done by councillors in that body was done, in my opinion, at the committees where they met in private, where matters were not judged by a political standard but on the merits of the case. Everyone sitting around those tables in various committees wants to do the very best thing for the citizens; yet when it comes to the monthly meeting, which is in the glare of publicity, to listen to that body you would think they spent all their time wrangling with one another. Therefore, I would be very much afraid that the idea of broadcasting from here or from other places would lead to all sorts of difficulties and might change the face of the assemblies involved, and I would not be in favour of that.

I listen a good deal to RTE sound radio, and having regard to the difficulties of a limited purse, and so on, they do very well; of course, so does RTE television. However, I should like certain types of reports to be at a fixed time. I am not interested in fat stock sales but I know people who are. You have to listen through a welter of Northern voices screaming down the line, and sometimes they are cut off. I am referring specifically to after the half-past one news. You never know at what time the stock exchange prices are going to be presented. In the evening after 6 o'clock frequently they do not appear at all. Whether it is the fault of the stock exchange or the fault of RTE, one is left with the feeling that it was forgotten. If there is a regular feature and it does not appear on a particular day, there should be an explanation. Listeners are not a bunch of children.

Sometimes also you do not get the time signal and somebody will say that it is two and a half minutes after the hour. That is not good enough. A time signal is a time signal. I suppose it is better than nothing to get an explanation or at least a statement that it is now two minutes after the hour, but these signals should be exactly on time.

With those few remarks on the television, the orchestra and the Department generally, I should like to say I find the Post Office officials very helpful. Ringing up out of the blue—they do not know to whom they are speaking—I find I am always treated with courtesy. Our television does a good job considering the limited finances at their disposal and also considering that this is a country of extreme nationalism beside a country of what you might call liberal nationalism; the differences lie in our history. Broadcasting, whether it be sound or television is, as Deputy Burke said, a liberal thing. It cannot be confined, and sometimes therefore, it is hard for our people connected with these media to operate unless they are given the freedom of thought which, of course, Irish people love. They also love a good argument and a good fight. One has only to think of how they enjoy the "Late Late Show" which at times nearly becomes a bear garden. Sometimes I become enraged and would like to throw something at somebody who is saying something of which I do not approve. However, that is democracy, and I think Gay Byrne does a very good job; he gets plenty of kicks but he comes up smiling.

That is a unique show and yet it does not fall into the errors—perhaps that is the wrong word—of that superb show of some years ago but which was in many ways a terrible show, "That Was the Week that Was". I think it pulled the Government down. Perhaps that does not matter, but it did knock many institutions in our Western way of life. Whether that was good or bad I do not know, but the "Late Late Show" provides a Hyde Park Corner outlet, a sort of safety value for some of our extreme views.

Our attitudes to television and broadcasting are changing all the time. It is growing, and it is taking over a part of our life, whether we like it or not. Some of the contributions on television are superb. It can produce plays, psychological through looks rather than words, which can be deeply meaningful. Our small television and broadcasting system has to compete against other systems with almost unlimited money. In the circumstances we can say that they do well. We must give this problem every consideration. We must encourage the personnel of RTE to go ahead with what they are doing while at the same time we must sometimes protect ourselves from them. In the main they are good people who are very skilled. The public and the people controlling the authority must move forward in understanding and learning about this new and wonderful medium now existing in our midst. The Minister has a worthwhile job to do. I wish him well and hope that he continues to keep up the standards which have prevailed in the past.

Coming from south-west Cork, my first obligation is to refer to the Minister's statement on RTE. Since RTE were established we have had continuous complaints from my part of the country regarding reception there. It is believed that reception is particularly bad in the Rosscarbery, Union Hall, Clonakilty and Beara Peninsula areas. The Minister recently received a deputation from the Rosscarbery area. I thank the Minister for the courteous manner in which he received the deputation and for the assurances which he gave. I know that the Minister has problems and I must praise him for the courteous way in which he received the deputation and the manner in which he discussed their problems with them.

For over 20 years I have accompanied deputations. The Minister for Posts and Telegraphs could well advise some of the people who receive such deputations on the manner in which to receive them. The Minister dealt with the deputation with great civility. This is very important. There have been a number of Ministers in the Fianna Fáil Party over the years who were not endowed with the Minister's characteristic of civility. I remember one Minister who almost went out the door when we had a deputation from the west-Cork area because he was not prepared to deal with people who were not of his own political affiliations. I would like to thank Deputy G. Collins again on behalf of the deputation. As a result of our visit to him, we hope that our claims and representations will result in an improvement in reception soon in the Rosscarbery, Clonakilty, Glengarriff and adjoining areas where the reception has not been of a reasonable standard. In view of the fact that we had discussion with the Minister recently it is not necessary for me to labour this point here. After almost 11 years of representations—or agitations—we seem to be getting somewhere at last in so far as improving the quality of reception is concerned.

In the south of Ireland we have only one channel. We rely totally on RTE. We are somewhat envious, and perhaps jealous, of more fortunate viewers in the northern half of the country and along the eastern seaboard who enjoy four different channels. Deputy Dockrell mentioned that in some areas viewers receive programmes on five different channels. RTE have been in operation for 11 years. We have been told it is costly, and that a great deal of negotiation is necessary, to get agreement with bodies such as the British televisions authorities so that we can get their programmes in this country. I am only conversant with the problems on a broad basis. There is a demand in the south of Ireland for additional channels. This is justifiable. The question should be dealt with more actively than heretofore.

The point has been made that one of the reasons why we are going so slowly is that the income to RTE from advertising might diminish. Television is a national service. It is not controlled by private enterprise. That being so, the people should be prepared to contribute towards developments such as those I have mentioned. We would like an additional channel, or even two additional channels if possible, for the viewers in the southern half of the country. Perhaps the Minister would refer to this point when replying.

I have heard some adverse criticism of RTE since its inception. That is only to be expected, but I have never criticised RTE because I felt that they had a difficult job to do. Television was a new medium in Ireland and they needed time for development, but after 11 years they have got that time. There is a fair concensus of opinion around the country that RTE have been found wanting. I appreciate their difficulties concerning the selection and preparation of programmes. These difficulties were highlighted by the previous speaker, Deputy Dockrell. Tastes differ very much in the country. Deputy Dockrell, in the course of his statement, advocated programmes which would possibly have limited approval in rural Ireland.

Deputies like Deputy Dockrell are quite entitled to advocate an extension of particular programmes which they like and which in their view do not get sufficient time. That is one of the reasons why I refrain from being critical. The programme that would suit Deputy Dockrell might not suit others. I mention the Deputy and refer to his statement merely to illustrate a point. Programmes get different ratings. It would be difficult for the broadcasting authority to put on a programme that would suit all of the people. I suggest that would be almost impossible. Nevertheless it is not unreasonable to suggest that they should be able to broadcast programmes that would come closer to the Irish taste—if I may use that term—than is the position at the moment. I say that knowing the Irish tradition and having a good idea, as I should have, of what would satisfy the Irish taste.

I have no idea of the cost of television programmes. I do not know what the authority pays for films such as cowboy films, which have some attraction for younger people and for older people too. There are a number of films screened week after week which, it is generally accepted, have little appeal. It is time that the authority took cognisance of that fact.

Deputy Dockrell was worried about the broadcasting authority having to work on such a limited budget and suggested that they were doing a very good job having regard to the limited funds available to them. I have no expert knowledge as to what it costs to administer the broadcasting service, of what it costs to rent films, of what various programmes costs, of what other expenditure is involved. I have merely the knowledge that the ordinary man would have. The best I could do is to hazard a guess as to the cost of these things.

According to the statement supplied by the Minister the total cost last year of running the radio and television service was £6,127,935. By any standards, that is a formidable figure. Of that amount the radio service cost £1,375,394 and the television service cost more than £4¾ million. Accepting that my knowledge is limited, as I have clearly indicated, it is my view that we are not getting value for that kind of expenditure. Money is losing its value daily but I wonder if we are getting value for this sum of over £6 million, which was the figure for 1970-71. I merely ask the question.

What is the Deputy's opinion?

My answer is no. On many occasions I have expressed the view that this House should have a different kind of relationship with public bodies, that the House should get more information about the activities of such bodies. I have suggested time and again that there should be a select committee of the House to deal with State-sponsored bodies and that the Minister should have wider functions in regard to State bodies. The case against that, to give it first, is that if State-sponsored bodies are not autonomous it would be difficult for them to carry out their functions if there were too much probing by the House or by the Minister. I do not accept that. It is this House and, through this House, the people who have to repair deficiencies. In all State-sponsored bodies now the deficiencies are running high. If CIE do not make sufficient income to meet their commitments, the citizens have to pay. If Telefís Éireann are on the rocks they reach out their hand to the citizens. The same applies in the case of the ESB.

This House should have more functions in regard to their activities than it has at present. I do not agree with the system adopted in regard to State-sponsored bodies. Most of them now have been in existence for years and their only relation with Parliament seems to be one of coming back for money to meet their deficiencies.

With regard to the body relevant to our discussion here, Radio Telefís Éireann, I would suggest that the time has come when a Select Committee of this House should be appointed to discuss, not alone with the Telefís Éireann Authority but with all State-sponsored bodies, their activities to date and report back then to the House. I am altogether against the freedom of action these people enjoy. It would be a different matter if they were self-supporting and carried out their work effectively and efficiently and without continuous demands for subventions from public funds. Telefís Éireann has been in existence now for 11 years and the time has come when it should render an account of its stewardship.

There are two sides to everything and the best way in which to get the two sides of the operations of bodies like Telefís Éireann is to have the kind of committee I suggest which would meet with the boards of these State-sponsored bodies and exchange views with them. Possibly a great deal of good would accrue as a result of such activities. Members of this House might have useful suggestions to make and the whole exercise could lead to a more efficient service from these bodies. In saying this, I am not casting any reflection on the personnel of these bodies. All I am saying is that they should not have the freedom of action they enjoy at the moment. That goes for every State-sponsored body, Radio Telefís Éireann, the ESB, CIE and all the rest.

With regard to programmes, I said it is difficult to please everyone because tastes differ. I would like a breakdown of the cost of the different programmes. A film called "Daniel Boone" runs for one hour weekly. There are other American cowboy films. Could we have a breakdown of the cost of these programmes? It is essential that we should have this information. When we are asked about the cost we simply have no idea as to what the cost is. I am sure that were we to seek such information from the television authority we would not get it. The Minister should address himself to this question. Is he in favour of a committee of this House dealing with State-sponsored bodies? Is he in favour of any amendment of the Broadcasting Act of 1960? That Act gave very wide powers to Telefís Éireann. It was a new venture at the time and possibly there was some justification for giving these wide-ranging powers. Now, after 11 years operation, it is time the position was reviewed.

With regard to radio, the best place in which to hear comments on radio programmes is in a pub.

Hear, Hear.

By and large, the public are very pleased with the radio service, judging by the comments one hears. The public give radio a higher rating than they give television. The bulk of the programmes are very interesting. Some of us do not have the time to listen to radio programmes but those who do are very pleased with them.

That is so. The Minister referred to the telephone service. He obviously knew there would be a great deal of criticism and, in the course of his opening speech, he pleaded guilty because he was unable —I will not say unwilling—to meet in any reasonable way demands for telephone services. One should not be too hard on someone who enters a plea of guilty but, at the same time, he should not be allowed to get away scotfree. By what yardstick are applications measured? How is it that people in similar positions in the same area are not treated on the same basis when applications are made for a telephone service? Apart from those who could claim a telephone service because of special business interests or some other reasons or because it would be of general benefit to a number of people or because of priorities in the case of clergy and doctors and so on, why is it that other people are not treated equally? There are at present many who have applied more than two years ago——

Three years.

Deputy Begley says three years ago. Why should their applications not have been dealt with? Why did an applicant who applied six or seven months ago get this phone installed against an application of three years ago, particularly when the applicant of six or seven months back had no special merit attached to his claim? It is held—I referred to it here and was told it was not the case—that telephone applications are now used by the Government party to collect votes.

They are not collecting revenue.

The Deputy is a charitable man; I do not think he means that.

For the information of the Parliamentary Secretary this is how it works. A person will say that he has been trying to get a phone for a year or 18 months or two years or even three years and that nothing is happening except an acknowledgment from the contracts manager. He says he went to Fine Gael and to Labour and they could not do anything for him. Then he is told: "Why do you not go to our man?" I am sure this is a national rather than a local practice.

I have been waiting for phones in County Dublin for a long time.

I am sorry to hear that. The Deputy may not be in the inner circle. I should like the Minister to make a statement on the allegation that to some extent telephone applications are dealt with on the basis of the political affiliations of applicants and those who make representations on their behalf.

As an example of the inflexibility of the Department in dealing with some applications I know a village in west Cork where there is already a dead telephone. The line was laid but the business was taken over by a new management with a reasonably high output and they have now been trying for almost two years to get a phone without success even though I am told the cost of installing that particular phone would be negligible since there was a phone in some part of the building up to quite recently. Why should that happen? I have made representations in this case on a number of occasions and it seems it is a case where a Deputy should put down a specific question to ascertain why this is the position.

About ten years ago I asked the Minister about the prospects of an automatic telephone exchange for the south-western part of south-west Cork, from Dunmanway westwards along the coast. I was told that such an exchange would be provided for that area in about four years or within five in any case. Ten years passed and nothing happened. On what basis was this assurance given in the House by the then Minister? Who advised him this work would be done or was likely to be done in four years time? No war or other difficulty arose in this part of the country in the meantime that would change the circumstances. Why was that misleading assurance given? Are we to assume that when questions are asked here on a matter of public interest, such as the provision of an automatic telephone exchange, someone in the Civil Service writes the answer with little or no checking? If so, that should be changed and I want an explanation. If the Minister gives it in his reply well and good, but if he does not we can get it by means of a question.

I have mentioned the Post Office Savings Bank on a number of occasions during Estimates debates. I should like, and apparently the Department would like, to cultivate savings habits particularly among younger people. One of the best ways to do that is through the Post Office Savings Bank but the Post Office pay low rates of interest, as low as any organisation in this country. In fact, for a while they were lower than the bank rates. In this inflationary period I do not regard a 4 per cent interest rate on savings as fair or reasonable. Inflation is running much higher than 4 per cent.

Why should a public Department ask a person who has saved a small amount of money to invest it at 4 per cent? In Dublin and Cork trustee saving banks have an interest rate of 6½ per cent. In today's newspapers there is an announcement that the Government are endeavouring to float a loan at 9¾ per cent but there is a vast difference between 9¾ per cent and 4 per cent. Can the Minister tell us why the rate of 6½ per cent cannot apply all round? Why is the rate given by the Post Office not the same as that given by the trustee banks? Is it because of the danger the banks might lose some of their deposits to the State?

It is wrong to ask people who have a small amount of money saved to invest it at 4 per cent when the prevailing rate is approximately 10 per cent. I realise the banks may have something to say about this but there is no justification for penalising the small saver. People in Dublin, Cork and other large centres are able to invest their money at 7, 8 or 9 per cent but the man in Schull, Castletownbere or in other areas has not this advantage. If he wishes to save he is obliged to invest in the local bank. Even if the rate was increased to 6½ per cent it would scarcely be sufficient when one considers the rate of depreciation of money.

Some months ago I asked a question here regarding a five-day week for postmen and I understood that this would be extended to all postmen throughout the country. So far this has not happened. Postmen are entitled to this advantage; in fact, all workers, with the exception of Members of this House, are on a five-day week.

I have dealt with the matters uppermost in my mind in connection with this Estimate: television reception; the provision of at least one additional channel for the south of Ireland—a matter of major importance; the difficult position in relation to the installation of telephones—in this connection the question whether applications are dealt with fairly or whether some people get preferential treatment even though their application may not warrant this treatment; and I also discussed savings banks.

I should like to assure the Deputy that there is no such thing as priority for party affiliations when it comes to telephone applications.

I am glad to hear the Minister make that statement in the Dáil because when Opposition Deputies are unable to get telephones for people we are told frequently by the people concerned that they were advised if they went to members of Fianna Fáil the phones would be installed without too much delay. I am accepting the statement by the Minister that this is not the case.

It is a relief to know that.

I wish the Minister well but I will confine my wishes to the current year because it might be dangerous if they were extended to next year. I am a firm believe that the Government should be changed and, therefore, I cannot be expected to wish the Minister too long a period in office. Fianna Fáil have been in office continuously for 15 years and this is long enough. Were it not for that I would wish the Minister a longer term in office.

The Minister for Posts and Telegraphs has a good personality and this is a great advantage. Deputations are able to meet him and discuss their problems in a full and frank manner and this is essential nowadays. Public people no matter what their status, whether a Minister, a Deputy or a civil servant, must be prepared to meet and talk with people, to be courteous and civil, to listen to their complaints and discuss problems with them. If they cannot do this they should not be in public life. They should retire to a private job where meeting people and discussing their problems would not arise. The Minister has the ability to listen to people and to talk to them and, as far as is possible within Fianna Fáil, he is a broadminded man.

I do not think there are any other matters to which I need refer so far as the postal services are concerned. The general body of postal workers are doing an excellent job. It would be superfluous for me to add to the statements made by other Deputies who have indicated that all branches of the postal services are generally helpful, with a few exceptions. The public have no complaints and for that reason I need not refer particularly to their activities.

I should like to thank the Minister and his Department for producing this very knowledgeable document to assist Deputies. They have gone to a good deal of trouble to tell us what they have been doing and what they intend to do during the coming year. The Minister and his Department employ 22,000 people in all grades representing, as he said, 2 per cent of the employable population.

Notwithstanding all the money that has been spent I have had many applications for telephones in County Dublin on the stocks for a long time. The Minister and his Department cannot work miracles. Over the past years the population in County Dublin has increased to almost 60,000 people. With all the new developments in the county there are demands for telephones day after day. Hardly a day passes that I do not get letters saying: "I have been on the waiting list for a telephone for quite a long while." I get in touch with the Department, or with the contract manager, or with the engineer and they explain things to me.

I should like to see the Minister being given more money, and employing more people. The trouble is that we would have to rob some other Department for which money is also required. We are living in an affluent society and, thanks to good Government, the standard of living of our people has been brought up so much that they are demanding more telephones. Everybody wants a telephone. I remember the time when you would have to go to a post office to use a telephone. I remember the time when you would not see a car outside a house, a council house, a small farmer's house, a businessman's house, or the house of anybody else. Today there are two or three cars outside houses and there are telephone lines going into those houses. That is a great sign of the times.

I should like the Minister to keep a special eye on County Dublin. A number of people living there are businessmen and they require telephones. I want to tell Deputy Murphy that there is no such thing as pull so far as the telephone service is concerned. The job is done in chronological order and as courteously and as efficiently as possible.

The damage to telephone kiosks in Dublin city and county is disgusting. It is impossible for the Garda to look after everything. I wonder would it be possible for the Minister to have small flying squads to deal with this problem. If somebody is caught damaging a telephone kiosk he should get jail without any option. My area is supposed to be reasonably civilised but two telephone kiosks not very far away from where I live were broken at night by some blackguard. These telephone kiosks provide a great social service. It is very annoying when people find that the telephone has been dismantled by somebody who has no regard for anybody else, and not even for himself. I do not think that ladies are doing this damage; I attribute it to men who seem to enjoy destroying anything provided for the benefit of the people.

The Minister is sending a car around to deal with television spongers and it might be no harm if it were generally known that he had one or two cars or vans scouting for people who tear down telephone kiosks. It costs a lot of public money to repair them. Instead of having glass surrounding the telephone kiosks I see that they now have very thin steel. This is a good idea but nevertheless it is broken from time to time. It is disgusting to see the damage done and the harm caused. After an accident, if an ambulance could be on the scene immediately, life might be saved. Many people die from inattention after an accident. Therefore, the telephone is essential.

I do not want to ask for too much, but I should like to see telephones provided at road junctions. I do not think the Department of Posts and Telegraphs should bear all the cost. It could be shared with the Department of Social Welfare and the Department of Health. Each year there are a number of accidents on every road leading out of Dublin. In an area of dense population accidents are more prone to occur than in rural Ireland. That is why I feel the Department of Health and the Department of Social Welfare should consider providing telephone kiosks at vantage points, thus possibly saving life.

The Minister has succeeded in extending the automatic exchanges in various parts of the country. I hope that work will continue. I want to compliment the Minister and his Department on their advertising in relation to post office savings and their method of publicising saving certificates. I should like to see this savings drive started in the schools through the Minister for Education. Even if the children saved for their holidays this would give them a wonderful example and it would stand by them in after life. It should be part of their education. It would make them thrify and give them a sense of value. Saving is just a habit. I never succeeded in doing this since I entered public life because I have had early enough money to pay my way, never mind saving. Perhaps I may do it sometime.

Keep at it.

I suggest to the Minister that he should enlist the aid of the Department of Education particularly, and other Departments, in this saving campaign. Children especially should be encouraged to save. They do not know now its value in later life. It is a terrifying experience sometimes when one goes to help someone in danger of being evicted. One sometimes finds that the wife backs horses and drinks, but more frequently it is the husband who does these things. The children are neglected. Therefore, in every walk of life saving should be encouraged and all Departments of State should participate.

Some years ago I referred to temporary postmen and their problems when they come to retire. All they had on retirement was the old age pension. Now there is, I understand, a gratuity payable to those men. The Minister has improved their lot considerably and I wish to thank him. Of course there are postwomen as well as postmen in Dublin. Some of them are old and a greater effort must be made to look after them on retirement. It is an old saying that you cannot take the breeks off the Highlander. Neither can we disburse money which is not there. I am thankful to the Minister for all that he has done.

We have heard a lot about Telefís Éireann and Radio Éireann. I must compliment them on an excellent job. I know the Minister had to intervene some time ago—it was his duty as the Minister responsible to this House and to the country for the proper running of that service—but I must compliment all responsible for the excellent programmes put out. I should like to see a few westerns thrown in on Sunday evenings.

The Deputy is from the west.

The west I am talking about would be a few thousand miles further away.

What are a few thousand miles between one cowboy and another?

Telefís Éireann have done an excellent job to improve our image abroad. Of course, there will always be people who complain and criticise. There are people who criticise us here in the House, people who would not have a Government at all if they could arrange it, dictators who would not allow anybody the right of free speech. However, RTE give a fair service to the people and the people can be proud of the service. In the 11 years since they were founded, Telefís Éireann have done a lot of good for the country. They have shown up very clearly the wrongs perpetrated on our brethren in the North. They have shown this to the world and have succeeded in improving our prestige abroad. I hope they will continue along these lines.

There is very little more I wish to say about the postal service. As far as I am concerned it is excellent in my constituency. People may complain about deliveries from time to time but they must appreciate that delays occur in every walk of life. We must put up with them occasionally. On the whole I compliment the personnel in the postal service. We now have a five-day week in Dublin. That leaves Saturday free from opening mail. It may be a bit heavy on Monday but it gives Dublin Deputies a free hour on Saturday and that is very helpful.

I would ask the Minister to continue as he is and not to forget my area of County Dublin. There will be another election coming up and I might want to contact some friends. I am asking you publicly to do it, not because I am a Fianna Fáil Deputy but in the national interest and in the interests of the people of County Dublin.

The Minister's statement to the House was, to say the least, very mild. I wonder, with all the rumblings that we heard were going on in Telefís Éireann during the year, whether he will keep his punchlines until the end of the debate. If that is his policy he is not being fair to the other Members of the House. Some of them might disagree with the type of punch he uses.

I should like to express our thanks to our spokesman, Deputy R. Burke, for the magnificent contribution he made. He certainly put research and time into it. It would be futile, I think, for anybody else, whether in Government or in Opposition, to try to keep to the standard or go into the technicalities that he brought into this Estimate. I would urge the Minister to take note of what he said. If he did speak for four hours and ten minutes——

Four hours and 46 minutes.

——that is a record for the Post and Telegraphs Estimate.

I hope nobody else will try to beat it.

It was the longest and the best contribution on Posts and Telegraphs that I have heard since I came into the House in 1969.

Ba mhaith liom cúpla focal a rá i nGaeilge. Cuir sé ionadh orm nár labhair an tAire oiread agus focal Gaeilge.

Ní raibh tú anseo aréir.

Tá a fhois agam go bhfuil an Ghaeilge go líofa ag an Aire mar bhí baint aige le Roinn na Gaeltachta ar feadh bliana go dtí gur thárla an tríobhlóid. Nuair a bheidh an tAire ag labhairt linn arís b'fhéidir go mbeadh cúpla focal aige. Téann sé i gconaí go dtí Dún Chaoin ar a laetheanta saoire. Tá a fhios agam go bhfuil an Ghaeilge go han-mhaith aige.

"Vote Begley" a bhí in úsáid i nDún Chaoin in ionad "Tabhair vóta do Begley". An Béarla a úsáid sa Ghaeltacht—go h-uafásach.

Bíonn Béarla á usáid agam agus measaim gur ceart do mhuintir Fhianna Fáil Béarla a úsáid má tá gá leis.

Maidir le Radio na Gaeltachta, tá sé linn anois le breis is sé mhí agus is dócha go bhfuil sé in am mionscrúdú a dhéanamh air. Tá mé féin sásta go bhfuiltear ag dhéanamh a ndícheall chun cláracha suimiúla a chur ar fáil. I dtaobh cuid dena cláracha b'fhéidir ba cheart níos mo ama a chur ar fáil, ach b'fhéidir le taithí go dtiocfaidh feabhas ar an obair sin. Tá na cláracha ceoil suimiúil taithneamhach, ach meascáim go bhfuil an iomarca meascáin ann. Ba cheart cláracha éagsula a bheith ann. Do bheadh suim ag gach dream iontu. Ba cheart clár a bheith ann do na daoine óga. Bíonn óg agus aosta ag éisteacht le Radio na Gaeltachta ach níl aon chlár ann faoi láthair dona buachaillí agus na cailíní atá ag dul ar scoil.

Cuireann sé ionadh orm nach mbíonn aon cheol le cloisint ach ceol duchasach agus "ceilí music". Tá sé in am ceol na Fraince nó ceol na Rúise nó ceol na Síne a chloisint. Tá daoine na Gaeltachta i bhfad níos cliste ná mar a mheasann cuid dena daoine atá i mbun an cheoil sin. An peaca mór é focal Béarla a labhairt ar radio na Gaeltacht? Molaim go hard na cláracha agallamha idir na sean-daoine, go mór mhór na seanchaithe. Is brea bheith ag éisteacht leo ag cur síos ar a n-óige agus ar an saol a bhí ann 60 no 70 bliain ó shin agus an saol atá ann faoi láthair.

Ceapas go raibh siad go léir marbh anois.

Níl. Is dócha nach raibh tú thiar i gCiarraí le cúpla bliain.

Le cúpla bliain.

An chéad uair eile a bheidh tú i gCiarraí Thiar tar chugam agus tabharfaidh an bheirt againn cúairt siúd atá 70, 80 agus 90 bliain d'aois. Tá siad ann. Do bheadh anáthas orm dá gcoimeádfadh Radio Telefís Éireann na téip-thaifeadáin úd agus iad a dháileadh ar na scoileanna mar tá Gaeilge an-mhaith ag na daoine sin. Níl an litriú nua acu; níl an lithriú simplí acu ach tá plúr-scoth na Gaeilge acu ó sean-am.

Maidir leis am nuaiocht, tá brón orm a rá nach bhfuil ann ach liostaí de na daoine a fuair bás, dena daoine a rugadh agus dena daoine a pósadh. Dé réir ráflaí, deirtear go bhfaghann na tuairisceoirí áitiúla púnt in aghaidh gach ainm duine a choláthraíonn siad.

Ní fheadar an fíor é sin?

Níl a fhios agatsa ach tá a fhios agam. Deirtear go bhfuil tuairisceoir áirithe ann a fuair timpeall £80 mí áirithe i rith an tSamhraidh. Ba chóir don Aire féachaint isteach sa scéal sin. Is cúis gháire é imeasc mhuintir na Gaeltachtaí.

Níor chuir an tAire a ladhar sa scéal sin in aon chor.

Tá sé in am iriseoir lán-aimsire a cheapadh do not Gaeltachtaí—fear nach mbeadh aon bhaint aige leis an dtaobh chlé, leis an dtaobh dheis, le Fianna Fáil, le Fine Gael, le Dream an Lucht Oibre nó le Sinn Féin. Ní ceart croiceann faoi leith a chur ar scéala a thagann óna Gaeltachtaí faoi mar atá ar siúl i láthair na h-uaire. Ní ceart cathaoirleach dream áirithe— duine nach n-aithníonn an áit seo ina bhfuilimid ag caint, beith ina iriseoir ar Radio na Gaeltachta. Duine ar bith a bhfuil cónaí air i dTrá Lí, i Lios Tuathail, i nGaillimh nó i Muigheo agus a bhfuil suim aige sna Gaeltachtaí agus gur féidir leis Radio na Gaeltachta a chloisint go maith, measfadh a leithéid de dhuine nach raibh aon rud ar siúl sna Gaeltachtaí ach clampar, argóint, cearta sibhialta de short éigin agus scoil Dhún Chaoin. Tá i bhfadh níos mó ar siúl sna Gaeltachtaí.

Is baill den chomhairle contae mé féin agus mo chara dílis an Teachta Chub O'Connor. Bo bhaill de Chomhairle Chontae na Gaillimhe an Teachta Fintan Coogan agus an tAire Rialtais Áitiúil. Is baill den chomhairle contae daoine eile i nDún na nGall, i gCorcaigh agus i bPort Láirge. Tá na daoine sin ag déanamh iarracht scéimeanna éagsúla a chur ar siúl sna Gaeltachtaí—scéimeanna séarachais, scéimeanna uisce agus scéimeanna dheisiú bóthar. Ach ní bhíonn trácht dá laghad ar na scéimeanna sin ar Radio na Gaeltachta. B'fhearr le muintir na Gaeltachta cuntas a chloisteáil futhu sin ná faoi rud ar bith eile a mheastar a bheith ar siúl sna Gaeltachtaí.

Cloisim go bhfuil cúrsaí iolscoile á gcur ar fáil ag Ollscoil na Gaillimhe. Tá géar-ghá lena leithéid. Tá áthas orm gur ar Radio na Gaeltachta a bheidh a leithéid le fáil ach molaim do na daoine atá i mbun na gcúrsaí seo gan bacaint leis na téarma nua ach teanga na ndaoine a úsáid. Seachaimis na focail agus na téarmaí atá ceaptha ag "intelligentsia" Átha Cliath.

An Roinn Aistriúchán, an ea?

B'fhéidir. Ba cheart don Aire iriseoir lán-aimsire a cheapadh do na Gaeltachtaí. Bhís ag éisteacht le seanchaí cúpla mí ó shin. Bhí sé ag innsint a scéil féin. Bhí anshuim agam ann mar bhain sé leis an Ghaeltacht uilig timpeall 50 bliain ó shin. Nuair a bhí sé ag caint ní raibh a fhios aige go raibh Caitlicigh agus Protastúnaigh ag éisteacht leis an scéal. Bhí sé ag caint faoi dhaoine a tháinig isteach ar an dtrá tar éis timpiste. Cailleadh iad. Dúirt sé go dtáinig an sagart agus gur léigh sé na paidreacha os cionn an choirp. Ansin dúirt sé go dtáinig an ministir agus thosnaigh sé a ráiméis. Bhí daoine in aice liomsa. Conaíonn siad i gCiarraí thiar agus bhí fearg agus ionadh orthu gur dhein an fear seo focal a rá nach raibh ina cheann a rá in aon chor ach ní ceart go dtarlódh sin ar Radio na Gaeltachta. Dá mbeadh "News Editor" ann, abair, a dhéanfadh an focal "ráiméis" úd a scriosadh amach bheadh an scéal ar fheabhas.

That is my contribution so far as Radio na Gaeltachta is concerned, but there is one point I would like to reiterate. It should not be the position that part-time reporters are making a racket of news items. In the first instance the reporters employed by the medium should recognise the State. It is wrong to broadcast a news item over Radio na Gaeltachta that is an insult to the intelligence of the people in those areas. Who wishes to be told that a cat had kittens on Mount Brandon and that the reporter was there to see the event? The position is as bad as that. It is necessary that responsible persons be in charge of news items. The Minister spent his holidays in my locality and some time afterwards I heard on Radio na Gaeltachta that a prominent Provisional IRA man was on holidays in Dún Chaoin but there was no mention of the Minister having been there. It was the same last week when Deputy Bruton spent the weekend in west Kerry. He visited the Ballyferriter CoOperative Society and saw the great work this society are doing, such as the reclamation of land. They give much employment. The Deputy visited Castlegregory also. News of his visit was sent to the radio station but it was not mentioned in their bulletins. They continued to issue silly stories that are irrelevant and are an insult to the intelligence of the people of west Kerry.

One incident which occurred was regrettable. The relatives of a person who had died at Dingle Hospital heard of the death on a Radio na Gaeltachta news bulletin before they had been notified officially by the hospital authorities. That should not happen. There must be a balance and if people are not prepared to execute their job in a responsible manner they should not hold these positions. There is no-half-way measure so far as this matter is concerned.

The Minister has had a series of correspondence from me regarding a special situation in south Kerry. This is an isolated incident. Substantial proof has been submitted to the Minister that at least five letters were either delayed or opened in the post at a certain post office. I wrote to the aggrieved party in this matter and my letter, too, was opened although because there had been complaints, I had taken much care to ensure that the envelope was sealed properly. The Minister must give his attention again to this matter. Another letter I had for him was delayed four days. The neighbours got that letter. There is something wrong there, but surely the machinery in the post office is sufficient to find out what is wrong. Perhaps my remarks here today will result in this situation being cleared up once and for all. I can only hope it will have that effect.

Regarding postmen in rural Ireland, it is my contention that they should be supplied with a greater number of postal delivery vans than are in use at present. These men provide a wonderful service and any extra expense that would be involved in the supply of extra vans would be justified in the long term.

I cannot agree with the imposition of a delivery charge on some telegrams sent to people in rural Ireland. If a man is living on the side of a mountain he should not be penalised in this way by the Department. At present he may find that there is a charge of 20p or 30p to be paid on the delivery of the telegram. All the children of the nation should be treated equally. We tell these people that they should try to remain in their own localities and, consequently, it is very unfair to penalise them in any way.

When telephone kiosks are being erected in any part of the country a central point should be decided on for the location. There may be technical difficulties involved occasionally which might require the erection of an extra two or three poles but, at the same time, there is no point in having every telephone kiosk erected outside a post office. When a telephone kiosk is being erected it should be put where the people of the parish usually congregate. There is a central point in every parish. Sometimes it is outside the local pub—there may be only one in the parish—or outside the community hall. The Minister should be more flexible. Just for the sake of two poles he could make everyone in the parish happy. I do not think this point has been made by other speakers. Deputy Burke, fair play to him, is not living down in rural Ireland and would not be aware of this, but rural Deputies are inundated with correspondence on this point. The Minister is a rural Deputy himself and I hope he sees what I am driving at.

(Cavan): Does the Deputy not think the post office is always the most central place in the parish?

No. The post office closes at 5.30 in the evening. I am speaking about small post offices. I shall not deal with that question—it is another day's work—because we could be talking about Galway for a long time.

The Deputy is quite convinced that what was done in Galway was wrong?

No. I am just alluding to it in a general way. I have not made up my mind whether the Minister was right or wrong. However, I was there when incidents took place, and I might as well say that I disagreed with the incidents entirely. In regard to telephone rental charges, if it is the policy of the Department not to encourage people to apply for a telephone they are successful because of the charges they make. I had a particular case— perhaps it is an isolated one—of a dwelling house that was next to a sub-post office. The man was told he would have to pay £165. If five or six poles were needed there might be some justification for the charge but the house was right beside the post office. A charge of £165 in those circumstances was ridiculous. It would be just as well to tell that man: "We know you cannot pay", being the best way to put him off.

Could the Deputy tell me if there was an exchange in the sub-post office?

That answers the Deputy's case.

Once an area has a certain number of telephones a maintenance man should be employed. It is ridiculous that if a telephone breaks down a man has to go 30 or 40 miles, maybe two days after the complaint has gone in, to repair it. There would be plenty of work to keep a maintenance man occupied full time because he could be connecting new houses or doing other preliminary work. The ESB have a maintenance staff, and various other companies have maintenance staffs. There may be difficulties in this that I know nothing about but I would like the Minister to think over this suggestion.

As regards the streamlining of the postal service, some towns are very annoyed that they are no longer mentioned in a postal address. Let me quote two examples from my own constituency: Dunquin, Tralee, County Kerry, is the new postal address; before it was Dunquin, Dingle, County Kerry. Then there is Ballinskelligs, Killarney, County Kerry; Cahirciveen is left out. The Minister is not being fair to the communities in these towns.

I now come to a matter which has given me great concern, that is, television fees and television reception; the two go together. I hate to say it, but I disagree with my colleague when he says that fees will have to be increased to improve RTE's financial position. It may be fine for fees to be increased in certain parts of Ireland where there is reception from five channels: BBC 1, BBC 2, UTV, Welsh TV and RTE. However, £7.50 is far too much for the type of reception we are getting from one station in the south-west of Ireland. The people in that part of the country are also entitled to civil rights. There should be a special television fee for people who can get reception only now and again from RTE and for those who are getting only very poor quality reception. If the people on the east coast are fed up with one channel they can switch to another. We have to wait for the newspapers the following day to see what is happening. The Minister should try to make an arrangemen with the BBC and ITV for the erection of booster stations, particularly in the south and west of Ireland, so that we could see what is happening elsewhere. I am sure the Minister would like to see "Match of the Day" when it comes on. Perhaps the Minister might give us his opinions about providing other stations for the people I have just mentioned.

Shortly after the Minister started his campaign about "television spongers" I was discussing with a man the film which showed six vans parked together.

The first house called on in my area was mine.

That was a courtesy call.

Two officials were shown getting into each car—a driver and an inspector. The man who was talking to me said "No wonder we have to pay £7.50 when there are two people in every car." We have reached the stage in the Post Office where every inspector has a driver with him. The producer of the film should have been aware of the impression that would be created by the film. The man I was talking to was struck by the point that it took two men to do the job.

I hope the Minister will give us a ray of hope about being able to get other stations as well as Telefís Éireann. The Minister should make a special effort to see that parts of Kerry, such as Headford and Glenflesk, get some television. The people cannot get a picture there at all now. The Minister may be able to tell us about booster stations being erected here and there.

So far as RTE are concerned some of their "ads" are unsuitable, particularly the one which describes certain brands of tyres. I know of some young fellows who say they are as good as the driver shown performing certain acrobatics with his car. It is being suggested that if certain tyres are fitted cars can travel at any pace without accidents happening. I do not know what steps the Minister can take in this regard. The message has got across that if one fits certain tyres one will not be involved in an accident while using them. That is not so. Emphasis should be placed on the need for care while driving and a warning issued that one's safety depends on being a good driver.

The Committee of Agriculture met in Dublin yesterday. They were concerned about the poor and cranky image which the farmers are getting on RTE. They were so concerned that they passed a resolution to the effect that the pleasant things which can be said about farming are not being said, but only the cranky things. The farming communities, organisations and cooperative societies are doing good work around the country. It would be useful if some of that good work were highlighted on Telefís Éireann to show one part of the country what the other part is doing.

There is a feeling about one programme on Telefís Éireann that all that has to be done is start a row in the Gaeltacht, then ring Telefís Éireann and they will be down with two or three cameras. That should not be so. There is a particular Irish programme which I make a point of watching as often as I can. It appears to me that one has to be extreme Right or extreme Left to get on that programme. A fortnight ago I was listening to a number of people being interviewed. I thought it was disgraceful that an interviewer should ask a panel "Are we going to go to war or have peace?" This House alone can decide on such questions. That interviewer should not take it on himself to ask any particular person or panel whether we were going to have war or peace. I hope we will never have a repetition of a question of that type. The Green Paper was under discussion on that occasion. The Minister might care to listen to the tapes of that programme.

I would like to take this opportunity of complimenting the personnel of all the current affairs programmes, the news, "7 Days", "Enterprise", "Tangents" and "Encounter". They are all good programmes. Friday night is not a suitable night for the "7 Days" Programme. Friday night is pay-night and people usually go out to the dogs or the "local" on that night. Thursday night would be a better night for that particular programme. I am sure that is why the TAM ratings for that programme are not as high as they should be. People are occupied in other ways on Friday nights. That is something we cannot change. I like Frank Hall's programme. It shows the lighter side of life. If a few public men or Members of this House are modelled in it, we can only blame ourselves.

In conclusion, I would ask the Minister to provide an all-night telephone service throughout the country. In some areas there is no all-night service. In the year 1972 every parish and village should have this service. The service could be provided through the local exchange or some other system.

On the Estimate two years ago I suggested that the system whereby the phone would ring once for Johnny Murphy, and twice for Nelly Flaherty and three times for Dick Burke is all wrong because the telephone conversation can be overheard. The Minister has taken steps but I wish he could do more in this regard.

I hope that when the Minister is replying he will refer to some of the points I have made, which are not technical points. I have not made the study of this matter that my colleague, Deputy Richard Burke, made. Fair play to him, he made a contribution to the debate which every Deputy should read again and again.

Je vais á trois heures cet aprés-midi á voir Leinster/ New Zealand á Lansdowne Road. It is not just to give the House a bit of colour that I air my knowledge of the language that we will all be studying and should have been studying long ago. It is not those who speak most say most. I shall confine myself to giving the Minister a little advice that should serve as a headline for the Minister in regard to the Estimate as it concerns myself and the people I represent. I have no intention of going into the technical field of the Post Office engineering services because I know nothing about them and if I were to attempt to do so I would get bogged down as others do when they interfere with things they know nothing about. I want to be as helpful as I can. I want to advise the Minister and his officials in order that we can have an improvement in the entire services provided by the Department.

At the present time a telephone is regarded as essential. This has been the position for possibly 15 years. I fail to understand why the planning section of the Department did not anticipate the demand for the service. Because of this lack of foresight we now have a priority list for telephones at the top of which are doctors, veterinary surgeons and others who are on constant call for emergency cases. Had there been proper forward thinking and planning in the Department, long before the present Minister went there, this position would not have arisen, a position which will continue well into the future, although I read with a certain amount of joy that the Swedish company is opening up in Athlone. That is something that six years ago I advocated in this House, not alone to meet the demand in this country but so that we could export to Europe. I am glad that this is now taking place and that the erection of the factory will proceed as quickly as possible.

Because of the expansion of the service and the demand for it there must be a new policy with regard to the recruitment of apprentices to the engineering section. I must say for the engineering section that as far as Limerick is concerned I have not got the complaints which I have heard about a delay of hours and possibly two or three days for investigation of complaints. That is not the position in the area that I come from and I speak not only for the city of Limerick but for the greater part of rural Limerick also. Complaints are dealt with immediately. In the city they are attended to within hours. I do not know of any more devoted and competent men than there are in the Post Office engineering service. I could not discuss the technicalities involved in laying, say, one line. I would advise the Minister that a recruiting campaign should be initiated immediately with a view to meeting future demands.

I would also suggest that more automatic phones should be provided. The automatic telephone eliminates delay in getting trunk calls in contrast to the former system where one had to wait one's turn and there might be a delay of an hour in getting a connection. The automatic telephone has eliminated that cause of complaint and should be more widely used.

There have been complaints about delays in the delivery of mail. My postman always appears between five minutes to eight and five minutes past eight every morning. I regard that as an excellent service. I would be the first to complain if the service were bad. I have had no complaints from anybody in Limerick about postal delays and there are few here or even outside this House who know as much about the people of Limerick as I do. In the past five or six years I have not had one complaint. Some years ago there was some kind of reshuffle and deliveries were a bit late but, as a result of representations, everything went back to normal. Now postal deliveries are dead on.

With regard to telephonists, night telephonists work a three hour period from 6.30 p.m. to 9.30 p.m. Income tax is deducted on an annual basis. If any of them is absent something like £3.50 is deducted. I met a case not so long ago where a night telephonist got a registered letter with 8p. That was surely carrying things a bit far. Of course, the postal authorities have to be strict in order to maintain public confidence. If they are not strict public confidence will be shaken and there will be prosecutions every day of the week. However, deducting £3.50 from £3.58 is carrying things a bit too far. I would ask the Minister to devote some of his attention to the position of temporary telephonists. They have a grievance. They are in the awkward position that they are nobody's child. They will not be accepted into the union and they have no one to speak for them. They should get some consideration. Surely they are entitled to better remuneration. This is night work and we all know what a chore night work is.

Where Radio Telefís Éireann is concerned, hardly a week goes by without some sensational news about the conditions of the staff. There must be something wrong when complaints occur so frequently. There must be bad relations somewhere along the line. As far as I can see, there is little or no security of tenure. Every other day staff are changed, staff leave, staff go slow, staff black this, that and the other. The image that should be projected is not being projected because of this failure in relationships somewhere along the line. An experienced public relations officer or personnel manager should be appointed to organise the staff and to solve whatever problems have to be solved. Only then will a proper image be projected.

I do not know who plans the programmes, but it seems to be a very jerky kind of operation. There seems to be no set plan. We have no idea in advance what the programme will be unless we refer to our daily papers or to the RTE Guide. Even then the advertised programmes are liable to change without notice. Again, we are not getting the kind of programme we should. We want to see our own way of life portrayed. The fact that “The Riordans” tops the list every week is indicative of its popularity. It is the Irish way of life that viewers want to see. We should have more of Lennox Robinson, Seán O'Casey, Synge, Yeats and all the others. We should get projected an historical background of our cultured past. That is most important from the point of view of young viewers who should be made to realise the hardships that were suffered to bring us to the position in which we find ourselves today. These are the things that will unite us and keep us together. Shortly we will be entering Europe and it is most important that we should do everything to preserve and foster our cultural heritage. That is not being done at the moment on Telefís Éireann. We get cowboys and Indians and gangsters and all the rest of them. The Minister should proceed along those lines as far as possible. I know that the research that must be done when pageantry has to be projected is a big job. We had an example of this in the debate on the Treaty. This was well done, an excellent production, even though it was done by a Limerick man. This sort of thing with a bit of pageantry is what we should get from Telefís Éireann.

I do not think we have sufficient cameras throughout the country. Fortunately, we have a man in Limerick, but he is away every other day. He was called on this week and it was found that he was on duty in the North of Ireland and would be absent for a week or ten days. With more cameras we would get more local and sporting events, more local cultural developments and this would arouse local interest and pride. People seeing things done on television would be inspired to do them in their own areas. Competition would spread to the whole Thirty-two Counties and competition in this connection is a very good stimulant. It would uncover hidden talent which would otherwise be lost. The Department should concentrate on this aspect of television.

More time should be devoted to sporting events in addition to what we have at present. On Saturdays we get perhaps two or three races from some meeting. The bloodstock industry is up among the top five or six. The greyhound industry is also very good but there are other sporting events which should get more coverage. I do not know who makes the selection but you find some local function getting preference over something national. That should not be. The programmes manager should give more time to considering how to satisfy the needs of the greatest number of people. He should not specialise on any one type of event. On one Sunday it might be soccer and on another GAA games and so on. The consideration should be to please the greatest number.

Like many other parts of the country we in my area are deprived of something that the eastern part of the country has. I see no reason why the whole of Ireland should not have the same television service. I know there are technical difficulties involved. I see now that Cork and Waterford are having a piped television service. That is good but why can we not also have it along the west coast in Limerick and in Galway? At present, because of the quality of what is being screened in Telefís Éireann some people turn off their sets and go where they can enjoy themselves better than in watching Telefís Éireann programmes. Along with providing piped television in Cork and Waterford this service should be provided along the west coast so as to cover the whole country.

I read with dismay that the RTE service is to be closed for some time on Sunday afternoons in the winter. This is the most stupid exercise ever carried out. If they decided to close down for two or three hours in the summer, except on days when sporting events such as hurling or football matches would be scheduled, I would not have so great a complaint. I could go some of the way with them, but when they suggest closing down in the winter for an hour or two they should realise that is the time when people are at home, in frosty and wet weather. Where can they go? Yet they are being deprived of the little comfort they can have at home. This should be reconsidered. The reports I have indicate that it would be much worse to close down the service than to keep it going. If it is being kept going, for goodness sake let us have some entertaining programmes on Sunday afternoons when people want to get away from the troubles of the past week.

These are the points I want to make about the postal and television services generally. I have condensed my remarks as much as possible. I do not believe in meandering on these Estimates; I want to be brief and to the point. I hope what I have said will bear fruit and I look forward to the improvements I have suggested being implemented.

Tá áthas orm go bhfuil caoi agam ar an gcéad ocáid dom a labhairt anseo an tAire Poist agus Telegraf a mholadh. Molaim é agus deinim comhghairdeachas leis féin agus lena a Roinn as ucht an Mheastacháin agus an cuid oibre atá déanta acu. Dá mhéid san, tá mórán fós le déanamh.

In complimenting the Minister on this my first speech in the House and congratulating his Department on the Estimate—and it is the greatest Estimate ever put before the House—I should first like to deal very briefly with the postal service. I am surprised that this service has been criticised because in our area particularly the postal service can stand up to any scrutiny. It gives a good service. For too long our postmen particularly in rural areas were one of the bodies of people who were neglected in our society. This has not been the case in recent years. There have been many improvements; vans have been provided in many areas but I would ask the Minister never to forget the problems these people must face. They are obliged to start work at an early hour and they must cover a vast area whether they travel by van or on a bicycle. The Minister should try to introduce a five-day week for rural postmen as soon as possible so that they may have the same working week as their colleagues in the city areas.

Generally the Post Office staff deserve to be complimented. They are constantly dealing with the public, they are courteous and helpful and, in the main, they are efficient. One group of people who deserve special mention are the night telephonists. I have known some of these people in Cork and in Dublin and frequently I have had to make phone calls from 10 p.m. onwards. I have found them friendly, courteous and helpful at times when most of us are surely, sour and not too helpful to our colleagues and others.

The same praise can be extended to most of the Post Office staff. Generally they are helpful and courteous. The telephone operators who work during the day work under a severe strain. Their job must be frustrating because most of us know how harassed we can become if we have to take a few phone calls in succession. The Minister and his staff must be complimented; the Department of Posts and Telegraphs present a courteous and civil appearance to the public. The engineering staff in Cork do a good job. When they are required they are available as soon as possible, although I realise they have their priority listings. This is quite right because the business firm must come first while the private phone has to wait. I have not had any cause to complain, nor have I seen any reason why complaints should be levelled at the engineering section of the Post Office.

At one stage the Department of Posts and Telegraphs was regarded as of lesser importance and responsibility than other Departments. However, having regard to the greater need and desire for communication the Department has grown in importance. One could say that the Department of Posts and Telegraphs in some way are educating the people and all these factors have magnified the importance of the Department. At one time there were not many telephones in rural areas; apart from the telephones installed in the homes of doctors, priests and local businessmen telephones were not installed in private homes. However, nowadays the telephone is regarded as an essential and many people wish to have a phone in their home.

If I sound rather parochial in my first speech in this House it is because I am more aware of the needs of my own area than of other parts of the country. Satellite towns such as Ballincollig, Blarney, Carrigaline, Passage, Rochestown, Monkstown and areas around Cork have developed very quickly in a few years. These areas are growing towns and have the needs of such towns. Doctors have come into these areas, shops have been set up, lounge bars—a doubtful benefit of modern society but a part of it—have been built and telephones are required for all of them. Many of the inhabitants of these areas work in the city and must be on call, and for them a telephone is essential. The Minister must endeavour to provide facilities for these areas; the people cannot be expected to wait for perhaps two and a half years to get a telephone. I appreciate that money is a scarce commodity but every means must be examined in order to get money to finance essential developments in these areas.

When television was introduced by RTE people in the south were delighted that they could see some programmes but that novelty has long since worn off. The Minister must be aware of the great need for better programmes. What was good enough last year is not good enough this year will not be good enough next year. We must strive constantly for further improvement.

RTE must be complimented on the vast improvement in several of the home-based programmes. I am not a great "pop" record fan—I am sure my friends would regard me as a "square"—but recently I was very pleased with a "pop" record programme I happened to see. The standard of production and presentation was very good. It was a credit to the people concerned and a compliment to them that this programme could have caught my fancy because I would never be regarded as a "pop" fan.

The programmes on current affairs are quite good. However, on some of the programmes—I am not confining this remark to current affairs programmes—frequently controversy boils over almost into a battle. Quite recently I heard a person on television say that he would punch somebody; I think we can do with much less of this kind of remark. I agree these may be isolated instances but they do not appeal to me. I admit that we cannot always agree but we should agree to differ in a quiet sensible way and this approach should be adopted on RTE.

The programmes on Sunday nights have improved. Last year we had a succession of crime, war and horror films for six or eight weeks. Perhaps certain people like these films but I think we got an overdose of them. Recently there has been an improvement in the kind of films that have been shown, but I would ask for more variety and a greater examination of some of the imported programmes. We should not forget that television has a great influence on young people and we should try to ensure that programmes depicting the better way of living rather than programmes dealing with killing and shooting are shown on our screens. I am not looking for all comedy programmes but, on Sunday nights, programmes should be devoted to light entertainment which would be acceptable and would be enjoyed generally.

Deputy Coughlan also mentioned something about which I feel strongly. With the advent of our entry into the EEC we should devote a bit more time on RTE to our own culture. We should promote our own culture and our own pastimes. We can project these things. We must preserve them. For that reason I want to impress on the authority the necessity for devoting more time to our culture and our pastimes.

We in mid-Cork have our black areas too. Although we have two Cork members on the authority I am disappointed that many more of the black areas have not been eliminated by now. Some of them are near the city and some of them are remote from the city. Possibly the more remote areas are the more important. Television in those areas fills a social need. The Minister should ask RTE to have all the black areas eliminated as soon as possible. The valley from Ballygarvan through Ballinhassig and on to Crossbarry is very convenient to the city yet it has very poor television reception, despite the fact that a booster station was erected nearby. I understand that the authority have this in hand and I would ask the Minister to speed it up. There are other areas like the village of Minane Bridge and the town of Clonakilty and places like that where we should have a better reception.

Because of our geographical situation we in the south have not had the advantage which the people living on the east coast have. We have been confined to the one station. Through no fault on the part of RTE we have not got the variety of programmes which the people living on the east coast have. I want to impress on the Minister and his Department the necessity to eliminate all the black spots and to provide us with multi-channel television as soon as possible. We are entitled to avail of the same facilities as are provided in the east.

Níl morán eile le rá agam ach, mar focal scoir, ba mhaith liom a rá gur mhór an chéim ar aghaidh é Radio na Gaeltachta agus gur mhór an cabhair é chun an teanga do chothú. Is binn linn go léir a cloisint go bhfuil beartaithe ag an Aire an Seirbhís seo a leathanú.

Mr. O'Donnell

As is customary I should like to congratulate Deputy Fitzgerald on his maiden speech.

Hear, hear.

Mr. O'Donnell

The debate on this Estimate is usually devoid of political acrimony and most Deputies like to contribute to it. The attitude and the thinking of the Fine Gael Party on the activities of this Department have been dealt with comprehensively and very adequately by our spokesman, Deputy R. Burke. Other speakers have gone into more detail. I do not propose to repeat what has already been said. I will try to confine myself to some aspects of the activities of the Department in which I have a special interest.

I have found the Minister most courteous, most approachable and very accessible at all times, and very willing to assist Deputies on constituency problems. I want to place that on record and I make no apology for doing so.

I want to issue an appeal to the Minister in the strongest possible terms on behalf of a section of our people who have been forgotten down through the years, and who are still being forgotten. I refer to the very large exile population of Irish people resident outside this country. I want to appeal to the Minister to do something—and he can do it; the cost will not be prohibitive—to improve RTE radio reception in Great Britain, and particularly in the London region. I have many personal contacts with Irish organisations in Britain. I have a deep personal interest in emigrant welfare.

Time and time again appeals have been made to me, by individual Irish people and by Irish organisations in Britain, to try to improve RTE radio reception, particularly in the London region where the greatest proportion of the Irish population in Britain reside. I have had discussions with Mr. Hardiman, Director-General of RTE on this matter. I found him very fair, very anxious to help and very interested in the problem. The latest information I have had from the Director-General is that the bad reception in the London region is due to technical difficulties. They are due to the fact, I understand, that the wave band there is overcrowded. I was very pleased to learn from Mr. Hardiman that steps are now being taken to instal new equipment over a period of the next two years or so which should ensure better RTE radio reception in London.

I am not satisfied with this. It just is not good enough. I want to appeal especially to the Minister. No other Deputy has referred to this matter and I doubt if any other Deputy will. I feel very strongly about it. We have one million Irish-born people living across the channel. It is estimated that there are a further three million of Irish parentage, which gives a total exile population of four million. Surely we have some obligation to them. Surely it is not asking too much to ask the Government to provide this very basic facility which would help to make life in exile more pleasant and which would enable our exiles to retain their links with their homeland. They should be able to tune into the home station to hear broadcasts of all-Ireland finals and other sporting events, to hear Irish music, Irish songs and the news from Ireland.

Time and again people have pleaded with me and have pointed out how frustrating it is to tune into RTE on some special occasion and find that the reception is absolutely diabolical and could not be worse. I have looked into the cost of improving the service and I acknowledge the fact that some steps are being taken to improve radio reception over there but the installation of new equipment, et cetera, will take a period of three years. I ask the Minister to now make a practical gesture towards our emigrant population in Britain by shortening this period and speeding up the installation of the new equipment.

We have made a very bad mistake down the years in relation to the whole question of emigration and the problems of our emigrants. It reflects no credit on this or any other Government. We have now reached the situation where nationally we are beginning to think of the question of our exiled population abroad. We are very keen to go after them and plead with them to spend their money at home on holidays, to send back their money to be invested here et cetera but we have failed entirely to do anything to help them to make life in exile a bit more tolerable. We could, without incurring any great cost, without bankrupting the country, have provided proper broadcasting services for these people. I could never understand why, in a country like this, which has such a huge overseas population—I am not referring merely to Irish people in Britain but all over the world; we have a huge missionary population scattered to the four corners of the earth—steps were never taken to have a short wave radio station in this country. Various people refer to this. No explanation has ever been given to me as to why this is not feasible. I would ask the Minister, when he is replying, to give us some idea of what his thinking is in relation to this and whether he has any plans to provide this very desirable facility. Apart from the major question of a short wave radio station, I am asking him specially now to see to it that Radio Éireann reception in Britain is improved in the shortest possible time.

The Department of Posts and Telegraphs have, since the foundation of the State, been looked upon as a kind of cinderella Department, a Department where junior Ministers suffer for a time before they move on to higher things. In this age of international trade and commerce, of high speed travel, the development of tourism and so forth, communications and telecommunications have assumed a much more important role in the economic and social life of every nation. It is not inappropriate on the eve of our entry to the EEC to bear in mind that we are an island nation situated on the tip of Europe, cut off from the European mainland, a country which is vitally dependent on trade and commerce with the European mainland, and will be more so on our entry to the EEC. Communications will play a vital role in determining our viability, our survival and our progress in the EEC. It is vitally important then that the Department of Posts and Telegraphs and the Minister in particular should be conscious of the part he and his Department can play in the economic life of this nation and the social progress of our people.

I was pleased to see in the Minister's speech references to the fact that his Department are conscious of European developments in the field of telecommunications and to learn that Ireland is associated with various European organisations such as the European Postal Union and technical organisations in Europe. There is no doubt that our exporters, whether in manufacturing industry or agriculture and particularly the tourist industry, are dependent on up-to-date, sophisticated and highly efficient communications services. I am pleased to note that there has been a considerable increase in the number of companies and people who have installed telex services. The demand for this service is growing at a rapid pace. Telex, as well as the telephone, is a vital instrument in modern economic life. Our business people, our exporters and our tourist people will be looking more and more to the mainland of Europe. Our whole outlook, our attitudes and the very well-being of this nation will be influenced to a large degree by what will happen within the EEC. It is vitally important that the lines of communication between Ireland and Brussels should be the best that can possibly be devised. At present the situation is reasonably good. I investigated this a week ago. While my principal involvement may be in the transport field I believe that communications are of equal importance. It is essential that direct telephone dialling between Brussels at least and perhaps other European capitals and Dublin should be provided. The direct dialling service now available between London and Ireland is a tremendous asset and a great advantage to people who have to do business. The speed with which one can get a telephone call through the telephone exchange from any part of Britain to any part of Ireland has also improved considerably in recent years.

The telex system is a fascinating one. It is one that will come more and more into use. The Minister has given figures for the cost of telex rental. I would venture to say that the figure is not prohibitive for any company which is doing a good deal of foreign trade. I do not know what the situation is regarding the actual demand for telex service, whether the provision of a telex service is as slow as that of a telephone service. The main thing is that efficient lines of communication between here and Britain and the mainland of Europe will play a major role in determining our survival and our progress. Many business people and people involved in the tourist industry have expressed their concern to me regarding faults in the communications systems between Ireland and other countries. It is of vital importance, now that we are members of the EEC, that a serious look be taken at the communications services—the telephone, telex and telegraph services— especially between Dublin and the European capitals.

One particular aspect of the Minister's speech in which I was very interested concerns the exploration of the possibility of manufacturing telephonic and the various communications equipment in this country. This is a logical and a desirable development particularly in view of the huge demand for telephones in respect of which there is a great backlog of applications. I understand that apart from the financial problems involved difficulties have been experienced in securing equipment at the time it is required. The Minister has referred to the manufacture being by way of contract but regardless of what method is used, any step towards the large-scale manufacture of various types of telecommunication equipment is to be welcomed.

I was fascinated by a reference in the Minister's speech to the question of transmitting computer data by telephone. This is a development that I had not heard of before but the idea seems a fantastic one and one which has exciting possibilities. Perhaps the Minister would be kind enough to let me have more detailed information on this matter.

On the occasion of this debate Deputies have the annual crack at RTE and the whole question of political broadcasting. It is doubtful whether any few people are in agreement nowadays regarding RTE. We tend to concentrate more now on television than on radio but this is a pity because the quality of the sound broadcasting programmes is very good. During the past 12 months I have had an opportunity to listen frequently to radio programmes. This is because I had a radio installed in my car. Because the radio is so relaxing it may lead to one being a more relaxed driver. However, I have been greatly impressed with the variety, the quality and the presentation of the various programmes. I have expressed these views to many other people and have found that in general there is agreement that the approach to devising radio programmes is much more imaginative and generally better than that used in respect of television programmes. Many of the radio programmes are extremely educational in their context. This medium which one might say had been relegated to a position of secondary importance is doing a very fine job.

While on the question of sound broadcasting there is one particular programme to which I should like to refer. The relationship between politicians and broadcasters is a very sensitive one not only here but in many other places also. If a politician hears a commentary on the media that is unfavourable to him he will not like it. However, there is one programme in respect of which I have never heard any adverse criticism. From time to time a number of my colleagues, in particular Deputy Briscoe, have paid tribute to this programme. I refer to "Today in the Dáil". This is a simple, straightforward factual report of the daily proceedings in Dáil Éireann. No commentary is made on a Deputy's contribution. There is no attempt to analyse a Deputy's thinking and the programme succeeds in giving a fair crack of the whip to everybody.

I have been here for 11 years and I have never heard any Deputy make any adverse comment, publicly or privately, about the programme, "Today in the Dáil". I have suggested on a number of occasions, and other Deputies have also suggested, that that programme should be transmitted to television. I remember Deputy Briscoe giving a newspaper interview some two years ago and asking why was it that that programme, which is taped for sound broadcasting, is not transmitted to television. That could be done very simply. The name of the Deputy being reported could be flashed on the screen. I have found, in my travels to political functions and meetings of various kinds around the country, a growing number of people tuning in at night especially to hear "Today in the Dáil". Is there some reason why that programme could not be transmitted to television? I like the programme and most people like it because it is a straightforward report of what we say. What we say as politicians can be taken out of context and comments can be made. Sometimes we like what the reporters say. I am in favour of all news media projecting Parliament as it is. We all have our own peculiarities, human failings, personalities, attitudes and loyalties but, by and large, we represent a good cross-section of the nation. The news media should reflect Parliament as it is.

The programme "Today in the Dáil" is an outstanding example of good parliamentary reporting. The reportage is factual, unbiased, fair to everybody. I want publicly to compliment whoever is responsible for the preparation of the programme. This programme is an outstanding example of good parliamentary reporting and I and many of my colleagues on all sides of the House would like to see it transmitted to television.

Apart from that programme, the programmes in which a parliamentary political reporter gives an account of what happened in regard to various items of interest from the day's proceedings have given rise to general satisfaction. As I have said before, whatever the faults of Radio Telefís Éireann may be, whatever the internal problems may be, whatever may be the problems in regard to staff morale and staff relations to which Deputies have referred, we are very fortunate in that RTE has in its parliamentary reporting staff a team of journalists who would be a credit to any country.

In so far as current affairs programmes and programmes containing political commentary are concerned, the situation is not quite so good. Again, I have regard to the fact that one would naturally be influenced by the treatment one would have received in these programmes or by the fact that one had been ignored. Political commentators and those who prepare current affairs programmes have a very serious responsibility. I have detected a tendency on the part of some of these in the past to belittle Parliament, to belittle politicians, to belittle the role politicians play in the life of the nation. That is a horrible thing to happen. The late Deputy William Norton, a man who had lifelong association with the postal service, used to stress that there was a very serious obligation on the broadcasting media to ensure that the role of Parliament in the life of the nation, the functions of Parliament, the work of Deputies, should not be demeaned, should not be undermined, that there was a duty on the broadcasting media to reflect truthfully and honestly the working of Parliament and the efforts of the Members of Parliament to fulfil the obligations and duties placed upon them by the people who elected them.

As far as the parliamentary reporting staff are concerned, they do this with integrity, honesty and a very great measure of success, which is appreciated not merely by those of us who have the honour to be Members of Parliament but by the public at large, particularly by those who are interested in politics. I cannot say the same for the current affairs programmes. I shall not mention individuals or specify programmes. If the cap fits.... I am not satisfied. There are many others who are not satisfied.

I do not want to discuss in detail a matter which has been the subject of much debate, not merely in this country but in other countries, the relationship between Governments and broadcasting authorities or Ministers and broadcasting authorities. I was not here last week but I was rather surprised to read a report of a reference that had been made here to the manner in which the news staff in RTE have handled the situation in the North. Whether this reference was made by a Deputy on this side of the House or not, I do not know. It makes no difference to what I want to say. There was some reference to the fact that RTE did not handle this situation as well as the BBC or other broadcasting authorities handle it.

In my opinion the outstanding presentation of the unfortunate situation in the North in recent times has been the daily bulletin transmitted by Mr. Liam Hourican. I understand he has been honoured with a television award. Whether the award was for this particular programme or for some other programme I do not know. His reporting is a model.

Hear, hear.

Mr. O'Donnell

His reports are accurate, intelligent and concise. I have never met Mr. Hourican, but I believe in giving credit where credit is due and so I take this opportunity of paying tribute to him.

RTE have done a good job on the whole. I would certainly be prepared to defend RTE and I do not subscribe to attempts to compare detrimentally RTE's handling of the tragic situation in the North with the way in which the BBC and other broadcasting corporations have handled it.

The establishment of the studio in London was an excellent development. I should like further developments of this nature. I am anxious that there should be as many regional broadcasting studios as possible. Broadcasting should not be influenced entirely by the metropolitan outlook of a capital city. There is need for broadcasting facilities in major provincial centres and there is tremendous scope for the development of provincial programmes. The daily reports from the studios in Belfast and London have been very useful in keeping public opinion informed on developments.

I do not know if the Minister made any reference to the question of membership of the EEC. Is it intended to have broadcasting facilities or some kind of studio in the EEC headquarters in Brussels? This would seem to be essential because more and more people will be interested in what is happening there. I understand some of the newspapers are sending representatives to Brussels. I should like to see a studio established in Brussels, a studio which would send out daily or weekly reports. On matters of vital importance—the Minister for Transport and Power was at a meeting of transport ministers in Brussels recently engaged on a matter of vital importance to this country—our people would like to know exactly what is happening. I would like now to remind the Minister of two local problems. I might point out that I am an elector in the Minister's constituency.

The Deputy is very welcome.

Mr. O'Donnell

I sincerely hope my constituency will not be taken away entirely when the next revision is made. There are two matters I want to bring to the attention of the Minister. The Minister will remember a deputation he saw from Limerick some months ago in relation to some confusion that arose in the broadcasting studio in Limerick. The Minister might let me know what the position is.

My local area is a famous area. The President of Ireland comes from Bruree. We have no automatic telephone exchange. Hospital and parts of east Limerick have been automated, but Kilmallock has not yet been included. Croom is automated. I would ask the Minister to examine the situation. Kilmallock is a very important centre and it will be even more important if it is restored to me in the next revision of constituencies.

Deputy O'Donnell is extremely lucky in having three-quarters of his constituency automated. The Leas-Cheann Comhairle and I have less than one-fifth automated.

Mr. O'Donnell

At midnight, or later, if someone calls one has to get on to the operator and one hates calling the operator at that hour.

All decent people should be in bed at that hour of the morning.

Mr. O'Donnell

I have been asked to appeal to the Minister for automation and now that the Leas-Cheann Comhairle is in the Chair I hope we can look forward to it. We will combine our efforts.

As I said at the outset, I am grateful to the Minister for his courtesy to me on so many occasions in the past and for his accessibility and willingness to help on all occasions.

The Minister has been very kind in giving us such a lengthy introduction to his Estimate. The notes have been very helpful indeed. The functions of the Department are listed. Might I suggest to the Minister that he should some day get around to examining the functions of the Department. Some of them could be handled by other agencies, whether State or private. Are the Department the best agency for savings? The commercial banks and other agencies may or may not be doing a better job, but this is one area in which the Minister might possibly divest himself of a particular function in the interests of the Department as a whole. It is more than ever necessary that people should save, though it is not a very easy thing to do; if we are going to pursue to the utmost our plans for economic development it is vitally important that the savings of the people should be raised to the highest possible level. If a separate agency looked after the savings' drive there might well be a higher dividend ultimately. I appreciate that there is a national savings body who have done and are doing an excellent job.

Perhaps the Minister would consider handing over this activity to this body and so enable the Department to examine other possibilities which I shall mention later and about which some people are not happy. The technical services for civil aviation and the marine radio services might well be the responsibility of another State Department. The Minister may have done this already but I am suggesting that he should carry out an intensive scrutiny of the whole organisation of his Department and their duties. I do not say this in any criticism of the Department which must be one of the most varied in the State. I am saying that these should be examined in fairness to the citizens in general and to the Minister's officials and the many thousands employed in the Department.

It has been suggested for many years that the Post Office might be handed over to outside interests, even to a private firm. I do not mean a mere profit-making company but the public interest might be better served if the Post Office services—and by this I mean the sub-post offices, the General Post Office and the regional or area post offices which give a great service to the people, that narrow sector of it where one deals with people requiring stamps and the payment of social welfare benefits—were examined with a view to allocating them to other Departments. This would be comparatively easy in urban areas where there would be social welfare offices but I realise that in rural areas this would not be quite so easy and that therefore the local post office which has become an institution in these areas in many ways must carry out some of these duties.

The Minister might consider narrowing the role of the Post Office and establishing either a separate unit such as some of the semi-State companies whose job it would be to run that part of the service. The actual postal services must be carried on by the State. It is specially desirable that these should be provided by the State. It might well be that private enterprise would not undertake this great task because there would be no profit in it but the question is whether the post office sector would be better run by a semi-State concern. If our airlines are run, not by the Department of Transport and Power but by Aer Lingus, a semi-State body, why should not the postal services or the savings campaign also be run by such a body? Semi-State concerns are doing a fine job. I do not know what the impact of our EEC membership will be but if we are considering changes we might make we could begin with this Department and see where we could improve these matters and perhaps introduce some radical change in the whole structure.

The local post offices which I mentioned may be small but this is quite a big matter for the people concerned. In my own area we are pressing for a new sorting office and a new public office. I pay tribute here to the Minister for the way in which he has tried to clear away legal technicalities. I speak only of one centre but I am sure this could be multiplied by many instances throughout the country. If we do not have the best possible conditions for staff who must work 24 hours a day in shifts we should not expect the best postal services from them.

When one stamps a letter and posts it one can be sure that the letter will be delivered to the address for which it is intended. Behind that there is a tremendous organisation into which the letter is received, passed to the sorting office, sorted and sent on its way. Perhaps we take it for granted that this service will continue to operate but we have no right to take this for granted if, in some parts of the city or country the staff are required to work in old and unsuitable buildings. The one to which I refer in Dublin south-east was built at the turn of the century and is still serving the same purpose. Having visited it and seen conditions there, I urge that it be replaced immediately. I know the Minister is pressing on with this but if he would further expedite the move it would be appreciated not only by the public but also by the men and women who work there.

On this estimate one naturally thinks of the broadcasting service, a service which takes so much abuse during the year in the letter columns of the newspapers and, if one attends meetings frequently one finds that RTE is often under heavy criticism. We can all find some aspect of RTE to criticise but we should try to temper the criticism with the realisation that the authority are providing entertainment on a rather small budget. It is small when compared with broadcasting budgets in the neighbouring islands but very few people take this into consideration and realise that across the water they can spend £10 million to our £1 million and therefore can put on more expensive or expansive programmes, though not necessarily better programmes than those we are producing. The neighbouring broadcasting authority this week celebrate the 50th anniversary of their foundation; they have 50 years experience behind them while we have a mere ten or 11 years. We cannot, therefore, expect the same expertise or professionalism from RTE.

Having said that, I want to reiterate a point I make each year about advertising on RTE. Advertisements for tobacco have been phased out but this has not been done with regard to advertisements for intoxicating liquor. I suppose RTE cannot carry on without revenue from advertisements but I hope that sometime in the future the station will not have to depend on advertisements.

RTE screen many excellent documentary films, some of them in connection with youth welfare. These programmes are watched by families but in the commercial breaks there are many advertisements for drink with the emphasis on young people. One advertisement depicts young people arriving at a party; they are welcomed to it because they have a carton of stout or beer. In the film they are greeted with the words, "I knew you would remember to bring the drink". Many of the advertisements are filmed abroad and often famous footballers are depicted with a drink in their hands. I do not want to suggest people should not drink, but it is wrong to give the impression that the "in" thing is to drink and that the young person who does not drink is not "with it". We cannot blame RTE for accepting these advertisements because the advertisers pay large amounts of money and supply their own slides or films but the authority will have to pay more attention to this kind of advertising. It is doing no good from the national point of view and, so far as most of us are concerned, it is not doing any good for the concerns or firms who use this kind of advertising.

There is a deep responsibility on people who advertise spirits or alcohol. They must be well aware of the effect their advertisements have on the young or immature. The time must come when consideration will be given to phasing out these advertisements. The fact that so much space is bought on the television screen is a tribute to the drawing power of RTE. Because many of their presentations are excellent they attract a wide audience who are obliged to watch the advertisements during the commercial breaks. For people in my age group it does not matter too much but it matters very much for young people. It is a source of worry for parents who are aware of the influence of such advertisements on the young.

Even smokers agree that it is right that advertisements for cigarettes and tobacco have been phased out and RTE deserve credit for taking this step. Cigarettes harm the lungs but there are greater social implications with regard to advertisements for drink. There is a continual overemphasis on youth; young people are encouraged to believe that if they want to be blasé and “with it” they must drink.

RTE produce some excellent programmes. If they could aim at keeping up the highest standards they would attract advertisements from other firms and would not have to depend on the type of advertising I have mentioned. RTE have not been in existence for long and until the people are prepared to pay sufficient taxation it will be necessary for the authority to continue showing advertisements. Perhaps some day we will reach the stage when RTE will not have any kind of advertising. As our society becomes more affluent more television sets will be purchased and the number of viewers will be increased. At the moment much of the good work that is carried out in the schools is undone when the young people are influenced by all the poor type of advertising that is screened on our television. So long as nobody objects this will continue but parents are worried. They are our first concern rather than whether RTE are able to pay their way.

Progress reported; Committee to sit again.
Barr
Roinn