When I moved the adjournment last evening I was taking up the point the Minister of State raised about the relationship between youth work and the educational system. The Minister of State asked whether or not we should be expecting youth services in the Department of Education's youth work to plug the gaps, as it were, left by the educational system and he said he thought not. This is a difficult area, because youth is very largely the responsibility of the Minister for Education. I would certainly agree with the Minister of State that using youth service grants and structures to make good the deficiencies in another part of our public service is a very wasteful way of using public money. But we cannot ignore the fact that there are deficiencies in other parts of our public service and in the educational service as well. I was referring to the fact that we now have, courtesy of the EEC, special pre-employment courses in some schools. When you consider that some 80 per cent of our second level schools are going on to employment in any case—hopefully to employment rather than on the dole— it seems extraordinary that one should have to put down something separate and special and call it a pre-employment course because that is what school itself should be. It should be many other things as well, but it should certainly be a pre-employment course for our young people who are going on to take their places in the labour market.
I would like to make one clarification of something I said last night, something which evoked vigorous disagreement on the far side of the House. I referred to the amount of money made available for the youth services this year and where the major increases are. I specifically suggested that the major increases were only in the area of sport and this the Minister of State disagreed with. I now have a reply from the Minister for Education to a parliamentary question outlining the total amount of money available for the Government youth programme for 1978 and the main components of that programme. The answer given today indicates that in addition to the substantially increased sports grant, there is a £300,000 temporary grant scheme for youth employment and £106,000 for grants to vocational education on the specifically youth side. This is no doubt what the Minister of State had in mind when he shook his head in disagreement at my suggestion that the larger part of the increase was going into sport.
Now what I had in mind, and what I want to be more specific about, was the relative standstill in relation to grants to some youth organisations, a relative standstill which has caused these organisations no little hardship. I think the House will be glad to hear from the Minister of State whether or not, for example, one particular youth worker who is paid out of the Comhairle le Leas Óige grant-in-aid and employed in a parish in his own constituency will have his job saved for the next 12 months, because the latest I heard was that his job cannot be guaranteed since An Chomhairle have not got enough money to maintain all their existing programmes at the level at which they would like to maintain them.
The question this motion asks is what is the Government offering by way of a youth policy. The official publication of Fianna Fáil, Iris Fhianna Fáil, published before the election, contained several pages on the second national Fianna Fáil youth conference and a full page article by Pearse Wyse, TD, headlined: “This Government Has No Youth Policy. We have and here it is”. In this article I would draw attention in particular to the section headlined: “Training”. There are just two brief paragraphs.
I propose the setting up of a structure for the training of full-time and voluntary youth leaders.
There is a need for a regional development plan and the employment of regional development officers to examine and recommend the priorities of youth work, to take account of regional advantages, or the lack of them, as the case may be.
It is fair now to ask the Minister of State where is this structure that was promised? Where is the regional development Fund? Where are the regional development offices? To the best of my knowledge we have not got them. All we have is an advisory committee.
It is all very well to have a policy. Words on paper are a policy, but a policy is only a policy the people will respect if it is implemented. We have been waiting now for almost a year for the implementation of this policy and all we have got is an advisory committee. There is a very grave danger that if the work of this advisory committee is unduly prolonged the youth policy will have missed the boat by the time it reports.