Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Wednesday, 24 May 1978

Vol. 306 No. 11

Private Members' Business. Youth Policy: Motion (Resumed).

The following motion was moved by Deputy Kenny on Tuesday, 23 May 1978:
That Dáil Éireann calls on the Government either to immediately publish its own comprehensive Youth Policy or to adopt thePolicy for Youth and Sport published by the then Government in May 1977, and to ensure that aid to voluntary youth organisations is such that their programmes can be maintained and expanded.
Debate resumed on the following amendment:
To delete all words after "Dáil Éireann" and substitute the following:
"endorses the Government's policy on Youth and Sport and acknowledges the progress that has been made to date.
—(Minister of State at the Department of Education).

When I moved the adjournment last evening I was taking up the point the Minister of State raised about the relationship between youth work and the educational system. The Minister of State asked whether or not we should be expecting youth services in the Department of Education's youth work to plug the gaps, as it were, left by the educational system and he said he thought not. This is a difficult area, because youth is very largely the responsibility of the Minister for Education. I would certainly agree with the Minister of State that using youth service grants and structures to make good the deficiencies in another part of our public service is a very wasteful way of using public money. But we cannot ignore the fact that there are deficiencies in other parts of our public service and in the educational service as well. I was referring to the fact that we now have, courtesy of the EEC, special pre-employment courses in some schools. When you consider that some 80 per cent of our second level schools are going on to employment in any case—hopefully to employment rather than on the dole— it seems extraordinary that one should have to put down something separate and special and call it a pre-employment course because that is what school itself should be. It should be many other things as well, but it should certainly be a pre-employment course for our young people who are going on to take their places in the labour market.

I would like to make one clarification of something I said last night, something which evoked vigorous disagreement on the far side of the House. I referred to the amount of money made available for the youth services this year and where the major increases are. I specifically suggested that the major increases were only in the area of sport and this the Minister of State disagreed with. I now have a reply from the Minister for Education to a parliamentary question outlining the total amount of money available for the Government youth programme for 1978 and the main components of that programme. The answer given today indicates that in addition to the substantially increased sports grant, there is a £300,000 temporary grant scheme for youth employment and £106,000 for grants to vocational education on the specifically youth side. This is no doubt what the Minister of State had in mind when he shook his head in disagreement at my suggestion that the larger part of the increase was going into sport.

Now what I had in mind, and what I want to be more specific about, was the relative standstill in relation to grants to some youth organisations, a relative standstill which has caused these organisations no little hardship. I think the House will be glad to hear from the Minister of State whether or not, for example, one particular youth worker who is paid out of the Comhairle le Leas Óige grant-in-aid and employed in a parish in his own constituency will have his job saved for the next 12 months, because the latest I heard was that his job cannot be guaranteed since An Chomhairle have not got enough money to maintain all their existing programmes at the level at which they would like to maintain them.

The question this motion asks is what is the Government offering by way of a youth policy. The official publication of Fianna Fáil, Iris Fhianna Fáil, published before the election, contained several pages on the second national Fianna Fáil youth conference and a full page article by Pearse Wyse, TD, headlined: “This Government Has No Youth Policy. We have and here it is”. In this article I would draw attention in particular to the section headlined: “Training”. There are just two brief paragraphs.

I propose the setting up of a structure for the training of full-time and voluntary youth leaders.

There is a need for a regional development plan and the employment of regional development officers to examine and recommend the priorities of youth work, to take account of regional advantages, or the lack of them, as the case may be.

It is fair now to ask the Minister of State where is this structure that was promised? Where is the regional development Fund? Where are the regional development offices? To the best of my knowledge we have not got them. All we have is an advisory committee.

It is all very well to have a policy. Words on paper are a policy, but a policy is only a policy the people will respect if it is implemented. We have been waiting now for almost a year for the implementation of this policy and all we have got is an advisory committee. There is a very grave danger that if the work of this advisory committee is unduly prolonged the youth policy will have missed the boat by the time it reports.

May I explain that we have set aside a sum of £5,000 this year and a sum of £20,000 for training next year? Provision has been made.

I did not know we would be discussing next year's Estimates at this point, but I am interested in what the Minister has to say about money. I wonder what one can do with £5,000 in terms of setting up a structure for the training of full-time voluntary youth leaders in the current financial year. It is good to have a subhead sometimes so that one can add to it at certain points, but in terms of setting up the structure that might be needed it is a drop in the ocean.

It is a beginning. It was not there before. The Deputy conveniently forgets what I said was provided for next year.

The fundamental point I am trying to raise is that there is a grave danger that money will be wasted unless the structures are appropriate. In their pre-election statement they see a need for structures, and we do not yet have the structures that will consolidate and co-ordinate, they will see to it that the money is not wasted and that it is put to the best use. What I fear is that, if the Government miss the boat on youth policy there will be another boat and the people who will be on it will be mostly young.

I am glad that Deputy Horgan corrected for the record his statement last night in relation to the allocation of moneys from the Department of Education under the aegis of the Minister of State, Deputy Tunney. I have sought information on the allocation of this money, and I find that the overall increase in moneys allocated to sporting and recreational activities amounts to 48 per cent, which is a very sizeable sum of money.

I would like to take some of the figures mooted here last night. Deputy Kenny's contribution in particular was concerned about the allocation of money. In 1974 his predecessor in office did not allocate anything. He might have asked his predecessor about the extraordinary allocation for the nine-month transition period that year when with a 20 per cent increase it would have been reasonable to expect approximately £190,000 for the nine months April to December 1974. Instead £23,000 was allocated. The books were fixed for that nine-month year, and this meant that at least £170,000 which could have helped to develop youth and sport was withdrawn never to be recovered. I challenge the next speaker to refute what I have stated here in connection with the amounts of money allocated for the financial year 1974. It is worth adding that the grant to youth and sport in 1975 stood at £390,000. It increased by 2 per cent in 1976 to £400,000 and in 1977 there was no increase at all and it remained at £400,000. In 1978 this Government have given a 10 per cent increase to that grant. I was appalled by some of the statements. I would like to deal with Deputy Horgan's while he is here.

I do not intend to leave.

He commented first of all on the lack of attendance here in the Chamber.

I did not comment on the lack of attendance in the Chamber. I commented on the lack of attendance in the Public Gallery.

And also in the Public Gallery. If he checks the record he will see that he referred to both.

I referred to their ages, not their numbers.

I would like Deputy Horgan to know that there will not be a youth organisation of note in this country who will not read the entire debate taking place this evening. All the major youth organisations will be reading this debate. One thing I have always been conscious of is the tremendous interest that youth organisations take in anything mentioned in this House regarding youth in the little enough time that it gets here. I would like to say for clarification to Deputy Kenny now that, when I told him earlier today about the £3 million, I stated clearly that I was not speaking for the Government or for Fianna Fáil. I was speaking in a personal capacity. I was not a spokesman for youth in the community. I suggested that £3 million a year should be allocated to this. I maintain that view and I urge my Government to allocate that amount of money.

However, all speakers will agree that money alone does not solve all the problems we are facing. Indeed, the youth organisations are not demanding money alone. There have to be certain back-ups. In various debates we were requesting a policy document from the last Government. I quote from the Official Report of 28 May 1975, Volume 281, column 1142, where I said, speaking on the youth development policy motion which was moved by us:

It was to come out before Christmas 1973, then the summer 1974, then Christmas 1974, and we are still waiting for it.

We then jump to 10 February 1977, Volume 296, column 1317:

3. Mr. Wyse asked the Minister for Education the reasons for delay in announcing the Government's comprehensive youth policy: and if it will be announced during this Dáil session.

Mr. P. Barry: The main reason for the delay in the publication and implementation of a youth and sports policy was the prevailing financial situation. To publish a policy without a reasonable prospect of its implementation would create only frustration. The position of the document is now being reviewed.

Deputy P. Barry was then Minister for Education.

We know what happened. Within a few months the election was called and suddenly what purported to be a policy was produced. I do not intend to be harsh, but from listening to Deputy Kenny last night one would get the impression that every youth organisation welcomed this with open arms. That is not so. There were certain things in it which would form the framework of a policy, but there were also certain things which we would not agree with. For example, I quote from the document A Policy for Youth and Sport, page 43, under the heading “Major Proposals”:

(i) That additional funds be provided by the Department of Education to Vocational Education Committees for assistance to youth and sport.

(ii) That provision be made as an experimental measure for the employment of Community Animateurs in four areas outside Dublin who will motivate people to set up organisations for youth, sport and recreation.

The suggestion was that teachers would be allocated by the VECs to look after sports and recreational facilities rather than that youth organisations themselves would put up full-time youth leaders.

This is vastly different from what the youth organisations would have wanted. They would not have wanted a situation in which teachers would be allocated by the vocational educational committees. It was advocated that a new sports council be established. That has been done. It was advocated also that the vocational education committees implement the policy decisions regarding youth and sport, in other words, that that responsibility be handed over completely, that it would be taken away from the Department of Education. That would not be the right way to proceed. It is for a Government to assume responsibility for any youth policy they may implement and not to allocate the money to the various local authorities for them to spend.

Deputy Kenny referred also to the lack of amenities but I would remind him that the Coalition removed the £600,000 amenity grant and then announced an increase that year in the physical education section of the Department of Education. They tried to maintain there was a big increase in the vote for that year when in fact there was a net loss of about £300,000.

There was much fuss about the resignations from Comhairle le Leas Óige. Successive Fianna Fáil Governments allowed that body to give grants to the county council and to Dún Laoghaire Borough and it was conditional that the money spent came from the allocation. However, the Coalition were not prepared to continue that policy and on one occasion I found it necessary to produce a statutory document in the House in order to demonstrate to the then Minister that the council were not allowed legally to continue the situation that had existed. Finally the Minister agreed with me that there was some question of a legal problem. It transpired that the situation during the term of office of the Coalition was that if Comhairle le Leas Óige allocated £600,000 to County Dublin in one year they would receive an allocation of only £140,000 in the following year because their grant would be based on the amount that was spent within the city of Dublin; and if in the following year again they gave £40,000 to the county they would receive an allocation of only £100,000 the year after. That is the sort of conduct in which the last administration engaged.

The Minister referred last night to the quarter parliamentary secretary, the man who was in charge of physical education and recreation in the Department and whose section was comprised only of a couple of part-timers. Not only has the section controlled now by the Minister of State doubled in terms of staff, but they have been responsible for a great input into youth and recreation facilities generally.

We all share a common commitment to youth. I do not think young people would enjoy being made political footballs of. My commitment to youth goes back to 1972 because since then I have been involved actively in youth work. Deputy Horgan did not agree last night with what was said about the voting patterns of young people.

The parents and not the young people were codded.

What happened in the last election happened not simply by way of a vote for Fianna Fáil but because there was a complete rejection of the then Government. The Coalition's neglect in the area of youth was tragic. This year a sum of £919,000 is being made available for expenditure on youth activities. This is irrespective of sports. The grant-in-aid in respect of youth organisations is £278,000. Comhairle le Leas Óige will receive £200,000 in this regard and there is a temporary grant scheme of £300,000 in respect of youth employment. It is important to recall that last year the National Youth Council did a tremendous job in finding work for people up to 21 years old. I should hope that each youth organisation will avail of this scheme. It is important that young people are occupied. In the case of Stewart's Hospital the project continued into December. This year there is a grant to vocational education committees of £106,000 for such projects.

We are engaged already in in-service training. Deputy Barry has said that policies are not everything, that action is what counts, but we have allocated £35,000 for what is known as in-service training—youth exchanges and youth encounter projects. In addition the youth will benefit from the £462,000 that is available by way of grants to supporting organisations, sports councils, sports exchanges and major schemes. This is a sizeable increase and is a measure of the intent within one year of what the Government are doing in this area. An excellent council has been set up by the Minister under District Justice Sullivan. All the people concerned are known for their association with sporting and recreational facilities. I was delighted to note that the principal person concerned with the provision of amenities in Dublin city is an excellent official, but the Rules of the House prevent me from naming him.

There is no rule against naming somebody in a case like that.

I am referring to Mr. Liam Clare, a man for whom I have the utmost respect. He is the kind of person we need on such committees. I regret that Deputy Bruton is not here to contribute to the debate as he was the man charged with responsibility in this area during the term of office of the last Government. It is understandable that Deputy Wyse, who is Minister of State in another area, cannot be here in this capacity, but surely Deputy Bruton could have been here.

He has a clinic.

I saw him here a few moments ago for the vote. It is interesting that there is an overemphasis on the votes of young people and that there is the belief that by bribing them they will vote for one at election time. That is not so. In this connection there is an interesting anecdote regarding something that occurred some years ago in Dublin Corporation when it was proposed that sixpence in the rate be struck for youth work and recreational facilities. The proposal was agreed unanimously and a couple of years later when I proposed that the grant be doubled there was again unanimous agreement. However, the chairman of that committee—not a member of my own party—at the next meeting took to task one member of the council who had gone to the newspapers and taken credit for what I proposed. I told him not to worry because the councillor who proposed the original amount being struck in the rate lost his seat in the local election. No one should think that there are votes in youth work. It involved dedication, concern and interest.

Deputy Kenny and myself were present at the launching of the National Community Games and we heard the Minister's statement. We saw there real value for money. The Minister has given a 40 per cent increase in their allocation this year. They were very pleased, and I hope it will continue to grow each year. The Minister deserves some credit for this. The community games involve both north and south, bringing together young people in a sporting atmosphere. This is something which we all laud.

Criticism should be constructive. I believe that all the criticism which I levelled at the previous Government was constructive and based on my own knowledge of the scene. I believe that, given the right structures and framework, which is all that the various youth organisations are looking for, we will succeed.

The Minister has started very well. He is not merely interested in producing a document for the immediate gratification of certain people. I do not know how much went into the Coalition document. It was supposed to have been leaked to the press a year early. Perhaps they are waiting for a general election or perhaps, as the Minister of the day said, there was no money to implement it. Reading through it, I do not know that it would have cost very much to implement.

Did the Deputy read it in The Education Times by any chance?

I think the Deputy had a vested interest in The Education Times. I remember giving him an article on youth work. I do not know if he recalls it.

There was another leak since then.

The Minister reflects all of us in his commitment to nurturing the vital forces in Irish society, those who are committed to the development of our young people. They will not find him or his administration lacking in response to their needs. I say that confidently. I am satisfied that we as a Government have the imagination and the resources and, with the co-operation of voluntary organisations, parents and other volunteers, we will succeed. The manifesto is very succinct, precise and deliberate. We said we would do certain things. We have already commenced in a very laudable way and we will continue our good work. We believe in action, not words.

When we get the interim document in four months' time from the O'Sullivan Committee, who are working very hard and devoting whole days in certain instances to their deliberations, we will have something which will be welcomed by the youth organisations. It is important to stress that youth is impatient, youth always will be impatient. At the end of four years I will be very happy to compare our record with that of the Coalition. The time of reckoning comes at elections, and I have no doubt that youth organisations will see the commitment of Fianna Fáil to youth and sporting activities and to the provision of recreation centres and the Minister and the Government will have their applause.

Last night we heard a reference to the lounge bar society. It was Deputy O'Leary who used the term and it was one of the first occasions on which I could agree with what he said. This is a situation from which we are trying to get away. We want something more for our young people. One suggestion is that the post-primary schools should be provided with recreational facilities. It is important to realise that it was the policy of the previous Government not to have gynmasia and sports complexes attached to these schools. It is time for this Government to look at this again. I am confident that the Minister will push this matter and that provision will be made for gymnasia and other facilities for school and afterschool leisure activity.

When allocating money one should know exactly how it is to be spent. Taxpayers' money should not be spent wildly. The Minister, on assuming office did the right thing in inviting an input from various organisations. At that time these organisations were fairly frustrated because they had been dangled to and fro for four-and-a-half years. They probably felt that their case would be put on the long finger again. I think they now realise that this is not an attempt to put anything on the long finger. The Minister wants to know their thinking. He appreciates their dedication and involvement and the knowledge they have about what they are doing.

I remember going to a youth club some time ago and they were very disenchanted with one of the major youth organisations because they felt that it had become very bureaucratic and out of touch with the people. I wrote to the general secretary of that organisation telling him that this was the feeling. If they are not careful youth organisations can get out of touch with the people on the ground. Everyone associated with youth organisations, particularly at bureaucratic level, should be involved in some club or organisation where young people are active and should know what their thinking is. Thinking changes all the time.

I look forward to the day when we will have full-time youth workers in every major area. This is a tremendously important facet of youth policy. If all of us were given the same task we would not carry it out identically; we would have our own priorities. My priority would be to send into an area three full-time youth workers, one to look after youth clubs, one to look after unattached youth who will not join clubs, and one who would be in charge of administration. Much of the time of youth workers can be taken up by administration. Perhaps the Minister would bear this suggestion in mind. These youth workers would go into an area of about 10,000 people, spend about two or three years there building up leadership and then moving to another area. When youth leaders are too long in the same area they become dulled by the monotony and difficulty of their task and it is important that they should move from one area to another and train youth leaders in other communities. This is something which is very close to my heart.

I want to tell the House how impressed I am with the Minister of State's performance in this area. The youth organisations are also very impressed by him. He has not been holding 19 clinics a month. I do not want to get nasty, and if I could I would like to delete that from the record. The Minister of State goes out and meets the people in the youth organisations. His whole attention is riveted to the very big task before him.

I believe the last Government did not appreciate the importance of this. If we go after the youth as politicians looking for their votes and bribing them with this, that and the other, they will lose respect for political institutions and we will bring ourselves into disrepute. We should be putting our heads together and making constructive suggestions for a youth policy, constantly adding to it and improving it. We should learn from other people's experience, but we should rely particularly on experience gained in our own environment. That is very important. It is good to see how clubs in other countries operate, but we have more voluntary workers per head of population than any other country in the world. Where the professional worker takes over—and youth organisations recognise this—there can be a very dangerous situation. When the voluntary worker says "He is getting paid for it, why should I not be paid?" that is the end of the youth organisations. By its nature it must be voluntary. I hope that train of thought will be acknowledged by members of the Opposition.

The Minister's amendment reads:

To delete all words after "Dáil Éireann" and substitute the following:

"endorses the Government's policy on Youth and Sport and acknowledges the progress that has been made to date".

We are all interested in youth development, otherwise we would not be contributing on this motion. I have not yet seen any policy emanating from this Government on youth. To talk about endorsing something they have not got is being less than honest, in my view. Last evening the Minister spent the whole of 25 minutes attempting to denigrate two people. Deputy Kenny is a young man who is dedicated to sport. Since he became spokesman in this area a short time ago he has made a very big impact on the various bodies involved. While I respect the Minister outside this House, when he comes here he is a different person. His attack on Deputy Kenny last night was unwarranted and he did not produce any facts to substantiate what he was saying. What he did last night was little credit to him.

The Minister pointed out how well-got he was with various youth bodies. He said "the youth clubs know precisely where they stand, especially so far as I am concerned". In Youth Forum March-April 1978, No. 45, the headline is “Long Finger”. Deputy Briscoe mentioned something about putting things on the long finger. The article said that frustration and puzzlement were the first reactions from youth organisations to Deputy James Tunney's decision to set up an advisory committee on youth policy. Over the last four years these bodies have been submitting report after report to the Department. The Department know what is wanted to provide a good youth development programme. What is required is the will to implement such a programme and, sadly, that will is lacking.

On a point of order, does Deputy O'Brien know that it is the National Coalition's policy document to which he refers and which invited these people last year to make the submissions, after four-and-a-half years in office?

These youth bodies did not have to wait——

It is a National Coalition policy document.

The youth groups did not wait. They were conscientious and sufficiently dedicated to submit these reports. The Minister of State talked about four years in office but Fianna Fáil were 16 years in office and not even a Yellow Paper emerged. After a short four years the last Government submitted a comprehensive policy on youth and the youth movement accepted that as a working document.

The day a Government bring out a document that is satisfactory to all will be a wonderous day. When Fianna Fáil were in office for 16 years there was no youth policy and there was no sign of a youth policy until the Coalition came into office. Admittedly it took them four years to get the document out and possibly it could have been done in a shorter time. Nobody will deny that.

What does this Minister of State do? He sets up a committee. When you want to do nothing but you want to buy time, you set up a committee. That takes the Minister off the hook. If you ask a question he can say the committee are sitting on it. And how they sit and keep the lid on it. I see a need for some committees but this advisory committee have still not yet met, although it is now late May and they are supposed to have an interim report by August. June, July and August are holiday months so we know what type of report we can expect from the committee. I am not casting aspersions on the committee who will be used as fall guys if things go wrong. This forum says that there is no clear picture on what youth work is about. That is the comment coming from a responsible youth body on Deputy Tunney's thinking.

(Interruptions.)

Deputy O'Brien is in possession. If he is quoting from a document he should give the reference.

I refer to Mr. Curry's comments on Deputy Tunney's thinking. This is an indictment of the Minister.

The Deputy knows him better than he knows me.

I know that he has been involved in youth matters for a number of years and is an authority on them.

So am I.

It is sad that Deputy Killilea has to be brought in as some sort of heavy back-up service. The heavy gang are brought in when the Minister is in trouble.

Deputy O'Brien is in possession speaking on the motion. Any reference to a heavy gang in the House is completely out of order and it should not be used.

I withdraw the remark.

People might be heavy but that sort of reference is not in order.

The Deputy should talk about the slim Jims, it would be better.

Last night the Minister of State pontificated about what he was doing.

I only gave a simple account of what I have done.

Deputy O'Brien, through the Chair.

I do not pontificate. I gave a simple account about what I have done. That is not pontification.

Deputy O'Brien, please.

The Deputy can challenge anything I said I did that I did not do.

If the Minister has done nothing I cannot challenge him.

What about the sports council and the money I made available?

Money is not a policy. When people come into Government they say "right, we upped the ante by 10 per cent so we have done a better job than you". Ten per cent of an inadequate figure is not much. Credit cannot be claimed for just keeping in line with inflation. At the end of the day nothing has been done. I want to see a comprehensive youth policy evolving.

If the Deputy would give me some example of what I should do that I am not doing he would be helping me.

Let Deputy O'Brien do that, please.

Professional youth officers should be assigned to large urban areas. We must establish ratios so as to know where to appoint them, if we wish to evolve a proper youth policy. I know that will cost money but if a national emergency were to arise tomorrow money would be no problem. We are heading for a national emergency in relation to the youth population. An ad hoc committee will not be adequate to deal with this problem, which is getting worse. This problem must be tackled at top level. This will cost money but if we take the cost of vandalism in the community and the cost of imprisoning young people and balance it against the cost of providing proper youth services, it will be seen that it will cost very little. Deputy Briscoe mentioned a sum of £3 million in some broadcast recently. There are dedicated people involved in youth work but they can only do so much without the proper structures and back-up services. Last evening the Minister said that he would not see youth development as a prop for bad formal education. We have bad formal education particularly in deprived areas. Nobody can deny that. Consequently youth clubs and groups have a major role to play in education. Education is basically being able to develop all aspects of people's mental and physical make-up. There is no doubt that youth clubs have a very important educational role to play. The youth people will readily admit that this is something that should be reckoned with.

I agree with the Deputy but would the Deputy accept that there would be an obligation on them to indicate how the formal education curriculum should be changed rather than try to co-operate in something with a Department, if the curriculum is unsuitable?

If the Department of Education are not aware of the defects in primary school curricula, we are all in trouble, particularly our young people. The Minister knows what I am talking about. I am just elaborating on a point he made last night. So long as the system we have remains and so long as we have socially-deprived areas we will have serious problems which will fall for solution to the voluntary organisations. In socially-deprived areas usually there is a lack of self-confidence, a lack of real home environment. In central city areas there are bad schools, there is a dislike of schools and of formal education. We cannot run away from this.

Youth organisations have a great role to play here, and I speak with a special knowledge of socially-deprived areas. That is why I stress the desirability of establishing reasonable teacher-pupil ratios in such areas as distinct from better-off districts which have back-up services. There is a great challenge here but at the moment there is a great gulf which must be crossed as early as possible if we are to avoid serious trouble for the nation.

The important thing is to get down to proper professional training for our voluntary workers because the professional service will be only there as a back-up. We must encourage trainee voluntary workers when they are being trained. When attending such courses they must be paid in full by the State which is there to support such a service and not to supplant it. In giving that support the State must be seen to be generous. It must not cheesepare.

I agree.

I am glad the Minister agrees. Take Macra na Tuaithe. They get £70,000 from the State to help them in their work. It is only a pittance by comparison with their needs to finance their services. They have firstclass structures throughout the country mainly financed by various bodies. We can learn a lesson from the type of back-up facilities they have got. The Government should stop shilly-shallying in this matter. I have no doubt the Minister knows the problems. These problems will not go away and therefore the Minister must involve himself, communicate, stop talking about setting up committees, get down to the practicalities.

We have heard that an interim report will be published in August. It is only an interim report, a sketchy document. The Minister should not wait for such a report. He has sufficient knowledge and evidence in the Department of what is required and he should proceed straight away with the professional training of youth officers. We need an abundance of such workers not like the currant here and the currant there that you get in the fruitcake nowadays.

Youth organisations suffer enormously from lack of accommodation— many of them operate literally in hovels. At the same time our schools remain dormant at night time when they could be used as youth centres. There is tremendous potential here. Life is not without problems but they must be tackled. We cannot any longer continue our amateur approach to these serious problems and I therefore ask the Minister to forget his amendment which means nothing. It is only a Government subterfuge to get around the excellent motion proposed by Deputy Kenny. It is political gimmickry.

The Deputy is arguing that we should get the job done and I agree with him—that is what I am doing.

Deputy O'Brien has only a few minutes left and he should be allowed to proceed without interruption.

I am glad of your protection. Why is a Minister talking about setting up a committee? Why does he not adopt the policy of the previous Government and try to amend and expand it?

Where was it printed?

Where the document was printed has nothing to do with the matter before the House. Deputy O'Brien has only a minute left.

The Minister accepts what I have been saying. We have a serious problem and it will become a national crisis if it is not tackled in the near future. If it becomes a national crisis we will find money for it, but that may be too late.

The Minister has indicated that he is willing to take some action. I should like to hear him give some indication next week or in the coming weeks as to his policy. He told us he has a policy but we know nothing about it. This side of the House is willing to give him support in any constructive policy in this area.

I had not intended to speak until Deputy O'Brien put forward a point about the document in his possession. It must have been resurrected somewhere in the Fine Gael background——

It is a Government publication.

It was published on 10 February 1977. On that day Deputy Wyse asked when the Department of Education would announce the Government's comprehensive youth policy and he questioned whether it would be announced during the Dáil session. Deputy O'Brien remembers that this time last year the then Taoiseach and leader of Fine Gael took a stroll as far as the Park and blobs of sweat came out on the people on those benches. The reply of the then Minister for Education was that the main reason for the delay in the implementation of the youth and sports policy was the prevailing financial situation. This is stated at column 1317 of the Official Report of 10 February 1977——

Fianna Fáil have been in office for nearly 12 months but nothing has been done.

Our Minister has put in almost £1 million in one year in addition to a sum of £462,600 by way of grants.

The Government have no youth policy.

The Coalition gave nothing for four years until a month before the election. Opposition Deputies found a document and presented it. Many of the people on the back benches agree with what I say. More than a year ago the National Coalition tried to implement some kind of measure but they were too late for the reason given by Deputy Barry, namely, they were financially broke. We have put in £1 million in one year and by the time of the next election we may have £8 million. Despite the efforts of Fine Gael Deputies at the weekend at their punk rock concert——

I am calling on Deputy Kenny to conclude.

They are trying to make something out of nothing.

I have called on Deputy Kenny to conclude. I would ask other Deputies not to interrupt.

I do not know about the punk rock session——

It has nothing to do with the motion.

Whenever the Government have nothing to offer they send in Deputy Killilea.

The heavy gang.

Deputies on his side of the House at least should allow Deputy Kenny to speak.

With regard to the document that was resurrected, it is out of print at the moment. Deputy Killilea spoke about blobs of sweat. I understand there are more blobs of sweat on the horizon and they are not on our side of the House. I know Deputy Killilea of old; the only place to tackle him is at a church gate with a loudspeaker.

With regard to my comment yesterday that Deputy Briscoe in 1974 on the "Here and Now" programme had committed his party to spend £3 million, I indicated that might have been due to the fact that it is an early morning programme. However, after discussions with him today I withdraw the remark that he committed his party to that expenditure. It was indicative of his own wish that £3 million would be granted. On a technical point I am glad that he is in favour of allocating £3 million. I do not want youth work to become completely professional because if that happens we will do away with the concept and ideal of voluntary work which is such a strengthening factor in the moral fabric of our society.

Last night the Minister of State spoke in this debate. He indicated I did not read the document or that I lacked comprehension. I do not know how he came to that conclusion but if he wants to take me up on a wager as to whether I read it, I can assure him I am on a winner. He is a master of verbiage, political and personal. Going through his speech I get the impression of what I might call "Brutonmania" because every second paragraph has a reference to his predecessor, Deputy Bruton. He referred to the fact that Deputy Bruton had 19 or 29 clinics in his constituency, but I do not know what that fact had to do with the Deputy's youth policy when he was Parliamentary Secretary. Deputy Bruton, as a rural Deputy, was constantly meeting many people, particularly young people, and he got their views on what they wanted the Government to incorporate in a youth policy. I understand that since the Deputy left the Department his number of clinics has increased to 40. When he returns to office as Minister he will be in a position to draw up policies on many aspects.

The Minister of State is sitting in the Taoiseach's seat and he has 84 votes behind him. I should have thought he would be able to give a clear statement regarding a youth policy so that the youth organisations might know the position clearly. I thought his speech would have dealt with the motion before the House to such an extent that we would not be able to make any criticism of him. I thought he would have left us standing idly by with no criticism to make. That was not the case.

In his opening statement the Minister said he could not do anything with the document brought in by the previous administration because there was nothing in it to implement. However, he picked out some morsels here and there which makes me believe he must have considered there was some merit in it. The Minister should have been able to strike a definite blow for future generations. He should have shown that here was a man who would draw up a policy for youth organisations that could be copied not only throughout the country but internationally. It was his first time to speak on youth affairs in this country——

That is not so.

I am sorry, I meant in this Chamber. He had an excellent chance to put forward his policy. If he was not so interested in political matters, in talking about me and what he called my lack of comprehension regarding the document and about Deputy Bruton's clinics and his attendance at the Department, we might have got on much better. The youth organisations throughout the country are anxious to know where the Government are going. All that has been said and done from 1900 to 1977 is past. That is water under the bridge.

The policy introduced by Deputy Bruton was not a perfect model. It had faults. Every organisation in the country did not give it a whole-hearted welcome. Some of them were critical of it, but at least he put forward proposals for the immediate future and he provided a long-term philosophy of where the Government stood in relation to our young people so that youth organisations could draw up their plans and work within the very flexible framework contained in it. In the policy which has now been introduced we do not know how the fitness levels and participation levels in the sports for all areas are to be monitored and measured by the sports council.

On results.

We shall wait and see. As Deputy Horgan said it is a drop in the ocean providing £5,000 for an in-service training scheme. I am sure that the Minister of State has some influence at the Cabinet table and I compliment him for providing £200,000 for the sports area. He should go more often to the Cabinet table, and if he wants me to go with him I will. Most youth organisations are in financial difficulties such as Macra na Tuaithe to the tune of £27,000, the Scouts Association, £15,000 and other organisations are spending all they have as best they can.

All the youth organisations are doing their best to maintain existing standards, and with the greatly increased numbers joining those organisations they will find in a short period that they will not be able to maintain their existing standards. The Minister should realise that he was speaking for half the population and that they deserve more than they have got to maintain their existing standards.

It is very difficult for a civil servant to accurately assess the benefits to an urban child or a rural child of what they do in an informal setting. If professional people cannot join voluntary organisations, because of lack of financial assistance from the Government, the finger of shame points squarely at the department concerned. The sports council introduced by the Minister has definite potentials. The people in it have actively participated in sports. Some of them are heroes and heroines. They know what is needed to get to the top.

This sports council is different from the sports council proposed by Deputy Bruton in his document. He wanted to have the sports council co-ordinating all the different areas of sports from each department. He wanted civil servants on it. We have to take into account that Bord Fáilte, the Departments of Health, the Environment, Education and Defence and the local authorities are concerned with sporting activities. It is only natural that they should be co-ordinated into a central body as well. That is the reason why Deputy Bruton wished to have civil servants on the council. I do not want to give the idea that the council should become completely bureaucratic. Deputy Bruton's plan had merit from the point of view of co-ordinating all sporting activities.

The COSAC organisation had gone beyond their terms of office. They were extended by Deputy Bruton. The people in the area I come from never heard of COSAC. That is no reflection on the people in the organisation but is possibly a reflection that something new is needed. The system under which they operated was not adequate. The COSAC idea was terminated.

The idea of the voluntary organisations filling the gaps left in formal education is a very complicated area because there are inadequacies in our educational system. Every Deputy in the House could speak all night on education and we still would not come to a consensus as to what should be done. The Minister for Education could spend £100 million tomorrow and he would not see any concrete results for quite a long time. Voluntary organisations provide a very necessary personality ideal in young people. That comes from an informal area of education where they can follow their desires to a better degree. They may be shy and timid but in an informal setting they can develop their personalities to a much higher level. Voluntary organisations have a very important role to play in the education of our children.

Many voluntary organisations feel that the setting up of further committees and working parties leads to the idea of cynicism that the Department are not willing to implement a policy. If that continues the Government would appear to be the undisputed champions of procrastination. I believe I said prognostication last night. I should have said procrastination. Any Government should not have that title.

Will the Minister review the youth policy idea so that voluntary organisations can say that the Minister of State has produced something they can work within and that they can strive for? Will the Minister also look at the organisations that are in financial stress? It is a disgraceful situation if they have to let people go or if their value is hindered in any way.

Would the Deputy ask the Minister if he can provide a site for a den for the scouts in Navan Road?

I am afraid the debate has concluded.

Amendment put.
The Dáil divided: Tá, 66; Níl, 44.

  • Ahern, Bertie.
  • Ahern, Kit.
  • Allen, Lorcan.
  • Andrews, David.
  • Aylward, Liam.
  • Barrett, Sylvester.
  • Brady, Gerard.
  • Brady, Vincent.
  • Briscoe, Ben.
  • Brosnan, Seán.
  • Browne, Seán.
  • Burke, Raphael P.
  • Callanan, John.
  • Calleary, Seán.
  • Cogan, Barry.
  • Colley, George.
  • Collins, Gerard.
  • Conaghan, Hugh.
  • Connolly, Gerard.
  • Cowen, Bernard.
  • Cronin, Jerry.
  • Daly, Brendan.
  • Davern, Noel.
  • Doherty, Seán.
  • Farrell, Joe.
  • Filgate, Eddie.
  • Fitzgerald, Gene.
  • Fitzpatrick, Tom (Dublin South-Central).
  • Fitzsimons, James N.
  • Flynn, Pádraig.
  • Fox, Christopher J.
  • French, Seán.
  • Haughey, Charles J.
  • Hussey, Thomas.
  • Keegan, Seán.
  • Kenneally, William.
  • Killeen, Tim.
  • Killilea, Mark.
  • Lalor, Patrick J.
  • Lawlor, Liam.
  • Lemass, Eileen.
  • Lenihan, Brian.
  • Leonard, Jimmy.
  • Leonard, Tom.
  • Leyden, Terry.
  • Loughnane, William.
  • McCreevy, Charlie.
  • McEllistrim, Thomas.
  • Meaney, Tom.
  • Molloy, Robert.
  • Moore, Seán.
  • Morley, P.J.
  • Murphy, Ciarán P.
  • Nolan, Tom.
  • Noonan, Michael.
  • O'Connor, Timothy C.
  • O'Hanlon, Rory.
  • O'Kennedy, Michael.
  • O'Leary, John.
  • Power, Paddy.
  • Reynolds, Albert. Smith, Michael.
  • Tunney, Jim.
  • Wilson, John P.
  • Woods, Michael J.
  • Wyse, Pearse.

Níl

  • Barry, Peter.
  • Barry, Richard.
  • Belton, Luke.
  • Bermingham, Joseph.
  • Bruton, John.
  • Burke, Joan.
  • Byrne, Hugh.
  • Clinton, Mark.
  • Cluskey, Frank.
  • Collins, Edward.
  • Conlan, John F.
  • Corish, Brendan.
  • Cosgrave, Liam.
  • Cosgrave, Michael J.
  • Creed, Donal.
  • Crotty, Kieran.
  • D'Arcy, Michael J.
  • Deasy, Martin A.
  • Desmond, Barry.
  • Donnellan, John F.
  • Enright, Thomas W.
  • Fitzpatrick, Tom (Cavan-Monaghan).
  • Flanagan, Oliver J.
  • Gilhawley, Eugene.
  • Griffin, Brendan.
  • Harte, Patrick D.
  • Hegarty, Paddy.
  • Horgan, John.
  • Keating, Michael.
  • Kelly, John.
  • Kenny, Enda.
  • Kerrigan, Pat.
  • L'Estrange, Gerry.
  • Lipper, Mick.
  • Mannion, John M.
  • O'Brien, Fergus.
  • O'Brien, William.
  • O'Donnell, Tom.
  • Quinn, Ruairí.
  • Ryan, John J.
  • Taylor, Frank.
  • Timmins, Godfrey.
  • Treacy, Seán.
  • Tully, James.
Tellers: Tá, Deputies P. Lalor and Briscoe; Níl, Deputies Creed and B. Desmond.
Amendment declared carried.
Motion, as amended, agreed to.
The Dáil adjourned at 8.45 p.m. until 11.30 a.m. on Thursday, 25 May 1978.
Barr
Roinn