: With your permission, a Cheann Comhairle, I propose to take Questions Nos. 18 and 19 together.
There have been no evaluations undertaken in my Department or by consultants employed by my Department of the nature referred to by the Deputy.
The Transport Consultative Commission on Passenger Transport Services in the Dublin area which presented its report to the Minister for Transport in March 1980 paid special attention to energy matters (chapter 6 of the report) and these recommendations are being followed up with the task force established by the Minister for Transport following the publication of the consultative commission's report. The report in question gives information on the comparative efficiencies in energy terms of public versus private transport. For example, tables are included giving the primary energy consumed in transport by vehicle type and the energy consumption per passenger/kilometre for the various means of transportation.
The commission considered that the most effective conservation measures would be those aimed at achieving:
(a) a greater utilisation and increased efficiency of public transport.
(b) a reduced but more effective use of private cars.
(c) improved traffic flow through better traffic management.
The commission's report outlined a traffic management strategy aimed to bring about a reduction in traffic congestion, particularly at peak hours, between now and 1983. The essence of the strategy was a transfer of commuters from cars to buses by a combination of a revised parking policy, and a radically improved bus service.
I am very conscious of the energy conservation potential of an efficient public transport system and my Department will be giving attention to this. While the problems are fairly readily identifiable, the solutions are extremely complex and in general lie outside the area of responsibility of my Department.