Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Wednesday, 2 Feb 1983

Vol. 339 No. 7

Adjournment Debate. - Clondalkin Paper Mills Closure.

I should like to express my appreciation to the Chair and the officials in his office for giving me the facility to raise the situation with regard to the Clondalkin Paper Mills on the Adjournment. Briefly, I should like to recall the history of this mill, the last fine paper mill in Ireland. The operations of the mill were crippled as a result of high energy costs and the inability of the firm to compete in Europe where energy costs of paper mills were heavily subsidised. However, the prospects for the mill have radically changed as a result of the Kinsale gas situation and I understand the pipeline passes close to the mill. The Fianna Fáil Government gave an undertaking to have the mill open by 9 June last. That did not prove possible but that Government carried on negotiations. They brought the matter close to completion, so much so that all necessary formalities for a takeover by the State were agreed by all parties. At the last minute a legal technicality held the matter up. I understand provision has been made for acquisition in the Estimates. The Minister and the new Government are faced with the critical and vital decision which must be made now on whether they will adopt an arrangement which was negotiated through to a conclusion by the previous Government.

The time for decision is now. This is the last opportunity the Government will have to preserve a paper mill for posterity. The liquidator of that company has indicated in an affidavit to the court that very shortly he will break up the equipment and machinery of that mill, which goes back so many years, and sell it off to an American firm. In my view it will be nothing short of a national tragedy if that is allowed to happen. If a decision is not made affirmatively and quickly, the situation will go by default. The machinery will be sold off and we will have lost the opportunity forever of having a paper making capacity. We must all know and concede that, once it goes, the cost of setting it up anew will not be met and the country will be deprived of this vital asset.

Our consumption of paper is enormous. We see the consumption of paper in this House. We know that the consumption of paper by Government, semi-Government and local government sources would be sufficient to keep the mill going at full tilt. We spend large sums of money through the IDA and so on in creating new jobs. We have seen the enormous costs of creating new jobs and setting up the industries. Why do we not spend a far lesser sum to preserve this industry and to preserve those jobs, rather than spending much larger sums on creating new ones?

We are often told — and it has been pointed out by the Taoiseach on many occasions — that things are very difficult now with the world recession and so on but that in another year or two there will be an upturn and then we will have good times to look forward to. I want to ask this question. If we allow vital, key and essential industries like Clondalkin Paper Mills and others to go under and be lost, what will happen when the upturn comes? These industries will be gone past the point where they can be reclaimed. There will be no advantage in having the upturn at that stage. When this last remaining mill has gone it will be far too late.

The production of paper is a highly skilled operation. It requires great training and skill acquired over generations. The workers of Clondalkin have acquired those skills through the generations. They are anxious, willing and determined to carry on their operation and to preserve their jobs. They are so willing that they have indicated that they are prepared to go to jail rather than obey a court injunction to evacuate the mill. That gives some indication of their dedication to the preservation of their jobs and the mill.

As I have already indicated, it is essential that this matter be faced up to now. If nothing is done now that does not mean we can make a decision on this later. We cannot. The liquidator has sought an injunction from the court. He has indicated that he is negotiating with an American firm. Therefore, the whole setup in the factory will collapse within days unless the Government make the decision.

Before the last election the Labour Party gave a commitment to the workers in Clondalkin that they would do their utmost to ensure that the mill would continue in operation. I understand the Fine Gael Party also gave an undertaking and commitment to the workers in Clondalkin that they would honour any commitment entered into by the previous Government.

The Deputy's time is up.

The previous Government made a commitment to keep the mill open. I beseech the Minister and the Government to seize this last chance to take over this mill before it slips away forever. The set up is there. The reports have been made. The consultancy firm are organised to run it. I have no doubt that in years to come it will be a major profit earner for us as a nationalised industry.

On 8 December 1982 the then Minister for Energy submitted a memorandum to the Government seeking a direction from the then Government as to whether the purchase contract for Clondalkin should be signed. In the course of its presentation to the Government the Attorney General, to whom the Chief State Solicitor has referred the title deeds for examination, advised that a number of issues apparently of a substantive nature would require resolution before any signing took place. In the event the then Government decided that a decision should be postponed, in their own words, "pending further consideration of certain outstanding issues".

Since I took responsibility in this area, within the limits of the very heavy demands on all Ministers involved in the preparation of the budget, I have been studying the brief on the Clondalkin issue. I have met very widely representative delegations organised under the auspices of the Irish Congress of Trade Unions who presented their views to me in a very strong and sincere manner. I realise that it is an important decision from the point of view of the considerations mentioned by Deputy Taylor and also from the point of view of the possible financial commitments into which the Government would be entering which must be weighed up very carefully in view of the very difficult situation we are in with regard to finances and the Government's commitments in the industrial area.

The position is not quite as Deputy Taylor outlined it. The assets which the liquidator is seeking to sell are not among the assets which would be bought by the Government in the event of the Government being in a position to go ahead with the takeover. This is confirmed in a letter from the liquidator which was given to me by the trade unions, a letter to Mr. Peter Keating of the Federated Workers Union of Ireland. The second last sentence of the letter from the liquidator speaks about the disposal and says that this disposal in the first instance will concentrate on the assets which the Government have indicated they will not require if they proceed with the purchasing of the mill. So, the problem is not quite as immediate as Deputy Taylor indicated.

A potential purchaser, a German interest, visited the mill as recently as a fortnight ago and is studying at present the further possibility of his group becoming involved in paper manufacturing here. It will be some time before this potential purchaser is in a position to indicate finally his intentions in the matter. Basically that is the situation as it now stands. The Government appreciate the importance of the matter and are anxious that a decision should be taken as soon as possible. They have to satisfy themselves about the various commitments which would be involved on their part and they also have to bear in mind the other possibilities, such as the one I have just mentioned, which might enable the manufacturing operation to survive, which we all wish if it is possible.

I am glad the House has had an opportunity to discuss this subject. I am glad Deputy Taylor in particular, who I know has taken a major interest in the subject has had the opportunity to put forward his point of view. It is a point of view, naturally, to which the Government will give serious weight as they will to the representations made by the workers through the Irish Congress of Trade Unions. The Government have to take other considerations into account in coming to a final decision in view of their wider commitments.

The Minister's time is up.

The Dáil adjourned at 9.p.m. until 10.30 a.m. on Thursday, 3 February 1983.

Barr
Roinn