Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Thursday, 30 Jun 1983

Vol. 344 No. 5

Estimates, 1983. - Vote 21: Justice (Resumed).

Debate resumed on the following motion:
That a sum not exceeding £14,350,000 be granted to defray the charge which will come in course of payment during the year ending on the 31st day of December, 1983, for the salaries and expenses of the Office of the Minister for Justice, and of certain other services administered by that Office, and of the Public Record Office, and of the Keeper of State Papers and for the purchase of historical documents, etc., and for payment of a grant-in-aid.
— (Minister for Justice).

Very shortly we will have circulated to this House the Criminal Justice Bill. I come from a constituency where there are a number of major problems in relation to law and order. There is general lawlessness and vandalism. It is only fitting that I should say a few words on the items I hope this Bill will cover. We had a debate here recently on the Community Services Bill. I believe the present Minister for Justice is trying to deal with the problems of urban crime with which we have been bedevilled for a number of years. We have been hearing for a number of years that there were not enough gardaí on the beat. In the last year or two there certainly has been an increase on the number of foot patrols. The Garda have tried to co-operate with the community and to overcome the massive problems of lawlessness. It is almost impossible to stop the rising level of crime but if we could even control it and stop the escalation of vandalism, robberies, handbag snatching, robberies of houses, attacks on the person, if we could at least give some protection to the ordinary individual, we would be going a long way. I believe that the present Minister, so far as it is possible for him to do so with the present legislation, is doing that.

The major problem now in my constituency of Dublin Central and in every urban area is drugs. The godfathers of the drug-pushing industry are succeeding in getting entire communities into an unbelievable position. They are using the poverty and deprivation of the community to force them into robbing, theft and vandalism to feed their drugs habit. It is impossible to stop this with the present legislation. I know the Minister will take the opportunity presented by the Criminal Justice Bill to overcome this problem. I believe he will take hard, draconian measures, which will be implemented with a lot of criticism of him because the do-gooders of this world will tell him that his measures will discriminate against this person and that person. It will be like the argument in 1977 that we did not need Loughan House. Anyone who is familiar with the areas in this city where the real crime takes place will realise that it is not a question of a community centre or an open space or a job. There are social problems, problems that are very important, but what this country needs very badly is not alone adequate measures to deal with the social issues but equally to deal with those people who use for crime the lack of social facilities and the lack of opportunities in this life.

In Dublin city at present there are many people who will abuse whatever system they can to further their own interests in crime. These people have to be dealt with. They have to be taken out of the system. If that is not done there is no chance of dealing with either the social problems or the problems of law and order. I hope the Minister and the Government will have the moral courage necessary to implement a Bill which is necessary to deal with that problem, it will not be a popular measure. It will be a measure which will be supported by the silent majority, the people who are afraid to come out at night, afraid to walk the streets in the daytime and those people who have for a number of years been besieged by criminal activities.

Earlier on this year I used the wrong words when I said that if those measures are not implemented the people will take the law into their own hands and the vigilantes will take over. What I should have more correctly said was that, if there is not co-operation between the local communities and the police force to overcome and eliminate those people who actively pursue crime as a way of life, this country and this city in particular will degenerate.

I know the Minister understands. He is from a city himself. There is a small element in Dublin, Cork, Limerick who will use vandalism and crime to make substantial sums of money. If the Criminal Justice Bill does not take these people out of circulation in a very tough and forceful manner it will not have done the job I would have thought it would do. Jobs and community centres are other issues and the godfathers of crime are not interested in those things. In one area a community centre was recently turned down by the local people. It was to be a very excellent community centre arranged by Dublin Corporation to be built by AnCO services in co-operation with environmental work schemes. It was turned down on the basis that if it went into this flat complex it would bring in elements from other areas and bring down the area even further. That is a sad reflection on the situation. It is sad that where facilities are badly needed a community besieged by the problem of heroin would refuse a facility offered to them. This is within a mile of O'Connell Bridge.

There is very little being done about these problems. I could take any Member of this House or you, a Cheann Comhairle, to a part of my constituency where you would see heroin for sale right now. These places are known to the Garda. The individuals who sell and push the drugs, who distribute them and co-ordinate the activities are known to the Garda, but still they operate. That is a sad fact. There are people between the ages of 14 and 18 whose lives are being totally destroyed. We are in here with fairly plush facilities talking about problems but not reaching a solution. We can talk all we like, but outside of this House people's lives are being pulled apart, families are being besieged, people are ruined forever, and some die — all because of the drug problem. If we do not legislate to deal with those problems we are failing in our duty as public representatives. I know that nothing I say would surprise the Minister or shock him. He hears it every day. Measures must be implemented to enable gardaí to arrest the racketeers, break their grip on the city and deal with these people who are dangerous to speak about or to work against. If they are not dealt with quickly, the city will continue to decline.

Three or four years ago heroin was almost unknown in the city, except in a few small circles. Now it is freely available in several areas. If the resources are not made available to deal with this menace, where will it stop? One reads about unemployment, deprivation and lack of housing facilities; but up to 30 years ago the housing in this city and the jobs position were worse than they are today. The tenements and slums, most of which have been knocked down but some of which still remain, indicate the conditions of those times when the present-day amenities were lacking. Training schemes for young people and development and youth employment offices were unknown in the inner city. In those times there was no problem of neighbour attacking neighbour, or of one street warning against another, of godfathers, drugs, vandalism and all the savage crimes using the present unemployment and recessionary conditions. These are a new trade to the city, mainly caused by the drug abuse problem and we appear totally unable to cope.

One can talk about more gardaí, more Garda overtime and more and better regulations; but there must be a will and people cannot operate on a nine to five basis, standing at the end of the street hoping that nothing will happen tonight. That is not the way to solve the problem. The Garda must be committed in their determination to do their utmost to cure the present ailments. If they do not, the consequences are unthinkable. They need extra legislation, but that is not the whole problem. Even with their present resources they can do a lot. I am familiar with their endeavours in the inner city and congratulate the present Minister and his predecessors on increasing the number of gardaí. However, it is no good only having numbers. This city cannot afford to have no-go areas. If we do not have them officially, they are there unofficially after dark. Gardaí must use the present resources and, it is hoped, the extra ones which they will get in the future with the support of everybody in this House, to tackle the problem of these area.

I am sure that the Minister will have the courage to bring in the Bill which is necessary for these times. There are the pressure groups that talk about the need to solve the root causes of the problem. The major crime gangs in this city are not interested in the root cause of any problem. They are interested in exploitation in every way possible. If the Garda cannot be confident of successfully bringing these people to justice, we are going nowhere. I have spoken frequently to gardaí on the beat who have told me of the five or six people who are causing the problems in their areas. At constituency clinics, party meetings, residents' associations and community meetings you will hear precisely the same names. However, you still see those people walking freely about the streets. I wish to put on the record that it is an absolute frustration for a young, active, committed garda who wishes to do his job diligently and to arrest such people. He may think he has a foolproof case against them but no sooner will the garda be out of the court than the person whom he brought into court will be back in the area. That is not an exaggeration, although at one time I thought it was. I have seen too many cases.

In my own constituency about 18 months ago a person had been arrested seven or eight times in the same month. The gardaí warned him of the dire consequences of his continuing in his crimes and when they came outside the station they found that their patrol car was gone. They knew where to recover it and did so. When gardaí cannot do their own duties no matter how diligent they are and when things like that happen to them, they feel useless.

There are a number of speakers from my party and from the Government who wish to come in on this debate which ends at 10.30 p.m. The Minister has perhaps one opportunity, because it is not every day that a major Bill on justice comes into this House. It will have to be painstakingly prepared, detailed and ruthless. We hear the opinion of the do-gooders who live far away from these problems and who do not understand the distress of the 75 year old women whose homes are broken into time and time again or have to listen to the elderly women whose heads have been beaten off the ground, to men who have had their wage packages stolen or their social welfare payments snatched when coming back from places like Cumberland Street or Gardiner Street. Unfortunately, these victims are not articulate in public debate. They are never asked about their problems. They are the silent majority who are absolutely sickened and bewildered by the present rules and regulations. They wonder if the day will come when Dáil Éireann will legislate for them. For years these people have traditionally supported democratic politics and have seen that these have worked, perhaps through two world wars but certainly through one. Now, in their old age, they have no protection. They can tell how these problems can be solved.

If these problems are not solved by democratic means, unfortunately people will think that there must be other ways. None of us agree with that, but there is an absolute obligation on us to ensure that the legislative powers are given to the Garda force to carry out their duties.

Otherwise, we waste our time as public representatives and the taxpayers' money. The Minister, as a man coming from an urban area, will, I am sure, take the necessary measures once and for all to take on the godfathers of crime — the social problems are a different Minister's responsibility. These people need sentences which befit their crimes. One can afterwards deal with the people whom they have misled. Until those criminals are taken out of circulation and serve the sentences which they deserve and not in and out under the Probation Act and because of adjournments and minor technicalities, the life of the city will continue to disimprove.

People may say in court that these criminals have offended for the first time, but it may well be the fiftieth time. They manage to commit serious crimes with the knowledge that there is a very small chance of being arrested. If they are arrested, there is a smaller chance of their being brought before the court. If they are brought before the court, there is an even smaller chance of ever being convicted and, after all those stages, if they are convicted they can be absolutely sure that they will not serve much of their sentences. They can go free and continue robbing, committing crimes of vandalism and skullduggery. If this continues, we will have failed absolutely as a parliament, as a body here to legislate. The Minister will have my support and I am certain the support of the majority of Members for whatever measures he sees fit to take.

There is an order under which the debate will conclude at 10.30 p.m. Is there agreement to allow the Minister in at this stage?

At 10.15 p.m.

Not later than 10.15 p.m. Agreed.

I agree entirely with the sentiments expressed by the last speaker. He dealt in great detail with the problem of increased crime in the city. However, this relates not only to the city. The malaise of increased crime has spread throughout the country. Those counties immediately adjacent to Dublin have been particularly hard hit. I am speaking about crimes in which there is violence and, as the last speaker mentioned also, crimes against the elderly and sometimes, too, against the very young. As legislators we have a duty to do everything possible to protect those who are no longer able bodied enough to protect themselves. The best way of tackling this job is by ensuring that our Garda force are sufficiently strong in number and sufficiently well equipped both in modern communication techniques and mobile equipment to be able to combat the kind of crime rate that this country has been experiencing increasingly in the past few years.

When the measures that are necessary are taken in respect of all types of crime, there will be some people who will be sympathetic with those who are given stiff sentences. There will be people who will say that there are mitigating circumstances in so far as many of the hooligans are concerned but we do not always have people to stand up and speak for the victims of those crimes. I am thinking particularly of the elderly who are almost afraid to go to bed at night because of the fear that their homes will be broken into and their property stolen. There have been programmes on radio and television in which older people related some of the very bad experiences they had at the hands of criminals. This state of affairs is a sad reflection on us as legislators and on society in general. We have heard of elderly people who have sat inside their doors with iron bars or sticks with which to defend themselves. This indicates a very serious stage in the crime wave. I know that the Minister is genuinely concerned with taking whatever action is necessary to deal in the shortest possible time with these problems.

Since the debate began speakers have been referring to the problem of drugs. This is an area that is causing great concern not only for the Garda but throughout society. Having regard to the big money that is involved in drugs it will be very difficult to deal quickly and efficiently with the problem. It is estimated that the drugs business is valued at about £25 million. That is £25 million worth of black marketeering that the Revenue do not hear about. It is business that is of no benefit to the State but which has disastrous effects on many people. The problem is one that must be tackled without delay.

The Department of Justice will need to co-operate very carefully with the Department of Health in order to ensure that there is a combination of detection and prosecution and that there is the custodial and corrective care necessary to ensure that the users of drugs are out of reach of the pushers. That is the most important element in dealing with this problem. We have heard of people undergoing treatment at the drugs unit in Jervis Street being frightened to the extent of leaving the unit as a result of threats from those who are interested in the drug-pushing business. Possible witnesses have been frightened into leaving the unit, a unit in which very good work is done. This intimidation has caused serious problems in regard to the detection and the bringing to court of the pushers. In addition to custodial care for users, the Garda must crack down viciously on the pushers to ensure they are put out of business. The last speaker referred to a number of areas in the city in which very dangerous drugs are readily available but that sort of situation prevails also in many country towns. It is causing grave alarm among parents.

After a period of careful mobilisation of the police force, after careful stalking of the drug pushers and after the removal from the arena of the users, it should no longer be economic for those who are bringing the drugs into the country to remain in business. If we can bring about that situation we will be eliminating one of the major causes of crime in our society.

The last speaker referred to mandatory or at least stiffer sentences as a means of dealing with the problem. It is essential that those found with drugs in their possession do not have an opportunity of going once again into the market place to peddle their wares. We must put the pushers out of society for a long time.

I mentioned earlier the necessity for a properly mobilised police force. It is recognised now generally that young hooligans stealing powerful cars are at a big advantage when dealing with the Garda in that those cars are faster than the Garda cars. These hooligans have little regard for human life and they have the resources by way of unlimited supplies of cars at their disposal. It is well known that in some areas only certain types of cars are stolen. This is because those vehicles are most likely to afford those who steal them the opportunity of escaping from Garda patrol cars. Because of this situation the Garda need to be supplied with very powerful cars. They need also the most up-to-date communications equipment through it is being alleged that some criminals now have such equipment. However, modern technology lends itself to a high degree of skill in the communications area. We must ensure that only the best is available to our Garda. They should be at least as well equipped as are any other police force in Europe. Because of the increased incidence of crime there is a greater need now than at any other time for such equipment.

Another way of helping to reduce the crime rate is to have increased foot patrols. It can be said with justification that two gardaí on foot are hardly a deterrent if an armed robbery is about to take place or if violent people decide to steal a highpowered car. However, a foot patrol will always be aware of the movement of such people long before they start on the road to serious crime. This has been established not only in towns and villages but in cities.

It has been suggested that extra gardaí are not the answer to everything and I agree. The Minister should have particular regard to new urban areas especially those where there is no Garda station. There are many such areas in my constituency of Kildare. Leixlip is one where there is no Garda station. Some years ago the population would not have merited a Garda station but now we have a huge community with an up and coming teenage population. It is essential that consideration be given to the provision of a Garda station in Leixlip and other areas where the population has grown. I ask the Minister to consider taking that decision in principle in the near future.

There are many towns in County Kildare where the number of gardaí in the local Garda stations has decreased, There can be no excuse for that. I know there are pressures on the gardaí and that it is expensive to keep a high manning level in country stations. Unless we are prepared to spend money on combating crime the problem will escalate.

I know the Minister is only too well aware of the things I and other speakers have said. I wish him every success in dealing with the problems we have. If they are not tackled they will get out of control and we will not have the resources to deal with them.

I must admit to rising with a certain feeling of pessimism and frustration. This does not reflect on the present holder of the office or on any previous holder but because of the frightening situation we have. Formerly we looked to the Department of Justice to protect us so that we could enjoy life in a happier fashion than is now possible. With the permission of the Chair I propose to take 20 minutes.

If the time is divided in a reasonable fashion everyone who wants to speak will be able to do so. Does Deputy McGahon wish to speak?

Yes, I should like to say a few words.

Deputies Gene Fitzgerald and Harney?

Over the centuries man has accepted and submitted to certain regulations. Whether they came from the temporal or church power we need not deliberate on. Neither need we deliberate on whether one power has weakened and in doing so has weakened the other. Nowadays man does not want to submit to any laws or regulations and because of that we have the present situation of which we are all aware. We are concerned here about doing something to redress the position particularly in regard to the moneys we extract from the community towards this end.

The people are getting very poor value from the legal profession at present. We know the position that obtains. Young men and women are selected from society. They are subsidised while they are reading law and pursuing legal expertise. The fees which parents pay represent only a fraction of the cost involved and so they are paid for by society. They emerge on society and their main preoccupation seems to be to defy society to prove that anyone is guilty of any offence even though in some cases the dogs in the street are barking that certain criminals can be identified and are living on certain roads in certain areas. These people are brought before the courts. Money is paid to the legal profession, the same legal profession educated by the community, so that they can play around with words and indulge in legal jargon and technicalities and defy anyone to prove anyone guilty of an offence. That is probably an over-simplification but I use it to demonstrate the ridiculous and laughable situation that has occurred.

I know of a case which occurred recently where a lady living in what could be described as a middle-class area was attacked and raped and where the person in question was identified. The guilty person was given free legal aid to prove that he was innocent. The lady who was attacked, injured and subjected to this trauma had to pay for her own legal aid to be represented in court. What a ridiculous situation. That lady had contributed through taxation to the education of the legal person in question. His legal adviser was able to call upon psychiatric, psychological and medical expertise at the expense of the community to justify what the wrongdoer had done. The lady who had suffered needed hospitalisation as well as psychiatric and psychological treatment but she had to pay for this herself. What a stupid situation. We must put it to the legal profession that we can no longer tolerate this tomfoolery or else the person on whose behalf they operate will have to pay for the service provided until at least we reach the stage where the offended and the innocent party can enjoy the same service. It is accepted that our courts exist not to establish the guilt of anybody but rather to defy the man in the street to prove a person guilty whose guilt may be very obvious.

Some years ago I as junior Minister at the Department of Education and the then Minister for Justice opened Loughan House so that we could contain some of the young delinquents in this city and other urban areas who were attacking people in the streets. They were sent for education and corrective treatment to Loughan House, a place which had services and accommodation superior to most I have seen in hotels. There was a hue and cry because we were sending young boys a distance of 65 miles, too far for their mothers to travel to see them. That lobby obtained in Dublin and elsewhere the interest and attention of many professional people who would cause the former Minister for Justice and myself of being devoid of certain human sensitivity in that we would send a teenage boy who might have been guilty of serious crimes away from the scene of those crimes, notwithstanding the fact that the very best facilities were being provided which were of a standard far better than would obtain in the normal school. I compliment the Minister on his decision to reopen Loughan House and I am hoping that other institutions will be made available so that these people can be contained and be given treatment which will serve to correct and deter them from continuing on the paths of crime.

I refer again to the lack of faith and confidence of the people in the legal profession and the courts. That is the saddest position in which we could find ourselves. I can understand why there is such little faith in the legal system. In my constituency and others teenagers and older people are attacking ladies, robbing bags and stealing cars. Those who suffer go to the local garda station and often the reaction from the gardaí is that they are sorry but they can do nothing because their hands are tied. These people are paying considerable sums in taxation to provide salaries for the gardaí and the legal services to which I have referred.

I am purposely not advocating more gardaí in my constituency or another Garda barracks. I could make a strong case for having more Dublin-born gardaí serving in Dublin districts because it is important that young people should identify with the gardaí. It is easier for a young person born in Dublin to accept as a friend somebody who speaks his own language, not somebody who has an accent or a language which is completely alien to him, somebody who may have come from a comfortable home in an isolated part of the country who would not be familiar with the difficulties of urban areas. It is also desirable in respect of elderly people that they should be able to deal with a garda as old as themselves. These are matters to which I would refer more fully if everything else were in order.

The main problem is that the system has been brought into disrepute because of what is happening. There are lawyers who would say they are pursuing a case true to the traditions of law or jurisprudence but to the public it appears that they have a vested interest in the continuation of what is happening because they are doing very well out of it. A person who is guilty of some offence and brought to a Garda station will not be allowed by the legal profession to talk to the Garda because the lawyers will be paid for talking on his behalf. That is nonsensical. Why should the taxpayers have to pay a lawyer to talk on behalf of a person who is guilty of a crime? I cannot see the reason for it. The sooner the better we change the system whereby a person is innocent until proved guilty. That system has failed us. Let us adopt the other European style where by a person is guilty until he can prove his innocence. We cannot afford to continue extracting from the people the colossal sums necessary to continue the farce of defying anybody to prove that a person is guilty of an offence when we all know that he is guilty.

The Minister has indicated that he proposes to introduce a new Criminal Justice Bill. That had been the hope of some of his predecessors. I hope he will carry on from the preparation that had occurred when he assumed office six months ago. I hope the Bill will be before us in the next session of the Dáil because I am not at ail convinced that the Bill dealing with community service will be of any use. I should like the Minister to indicate whether the necessary manpower to operate that Act has been arranged. I am sure the Minister has discovered that that Act will serve only in a small way to combat crime and that he will not take it as an excuse to postpone the major reorganisation necessary by delaying the introduction of a new Criminal Justice Bill.

The introduction of such a Bill would have a psychological effect on some of our people because elderly men and women would no longer be afraid to leave their homes. Indeed they could restart living, as it were. I say to the Minister that a great community need would be met by the announcement that a new Bill will be introduced early in the autumn so that old ladies who are afraid to go out can go out again and so that old ladies who are afraid to stay in can do so happily in the knowledge that they will not have unwelcome visitors and that if they do, penalties appropriate to the injury will be administered. It is only in that way that we will get across the lesson that must be learned.

I welcome this opportunity to say a few words on a subject I have been particularly interested in. I was elected on a platform in the crime-ridden town of Dundalk. Since I arrived here I have heard horrifying stories of crime in Dublin. We have the twin problems of what the economy can afford and the maintence of law and order.

Successive Governments have failed miserably to tackle crime and I must suggest that we are losing the battle. The old maxim that crime does not pay has become outmoded because crime now pays. Anybody who has read the newspapers about the recent trial of Mr Dunne will not have any difficulty in believing my words.

We should try to avoid referring to specific cases.

I believe firmly that what is needed in the fight against crime, if we are to be serious and if the public are to have confidence in our willingness to fight crime, is a radical rethink. I believe the only way to fight terror is with terror. The only way to deter is through a Judiciary who will do the job the people want them to do — to impose sentences on criminals appropriate to the crimes, when they are found guilty.

I come from a judicial background but I think the Judiciary have failed miserably in the last few years. Liberality towards criminals has gone from one extreme to the other. For instance, the crime of murder had been downgraded. A man was shot dead in Dublin last week but two days later that crime did not rate a single line in the national newspapers. It is no longer a horror for a man to be gunned down in the streets.

I echo what Deputy Tunney said when he criticised the Judiciary. It is a gravy train for them that there is free legal aid. A lot of that money goes into the pockets of lawyers. I am afraid the pendulum swings in favour of the person charged with crime and the Minister must redress the balance immediately.

On the question of policing, in my area we have a very good police force but I should like to see an increase in foot patrols because no matter how sophisticated crime fighting may have become we will never match the deterrent of the policeman on patrol. I suggest that part of the reason for the increase in crime in the past 20 years has been the removal of the policeman on the beat, the old-fashioned community policeman who has been replaced by four or five gardaí driving around in a car. There is an unanswerable demand for the return of the policeman on the beat.

We need more jails. I have a question down about the possibility of reopening the jail in Dundalk. I believe that the existence of local jails can contain local crime and I hope the Minister for Justice will look at that possibility.

The burning question throughout the country is the drugs problem. I hesitate to say what I would do with drug pushers because I might be branded as a dictator. If we are to be serious about the general crime problem some drastic measures will have to be brought in to contain the frightening crime of drug pushing. I do not think any sentence could be harsh enough for a person who feeds drugs to boys and girls of tender years. The Minister for Justice will have to deal with that problem many times in the next four years. He must get to grips with this at an early stage in his term of office or otherwise the problem will escalate out of all proportion. The situation with regard to drugs in Dublin is on a par with the problem that exists in New York and that is a frightening comparison for a country which 20 years ago did not have such a problem.

There is also the question of corrective custodial care. There is a need for remedial treatment for young criminals but we must also have deterrents. There is an absence of discipline in homes and schools and we must have some form of discipline for young people found guilty of criminal offences. There is a need for several Loughan Houses throughout the country and such institutions are fully justified. The Minister must consider providing more jails. My idea of a jail is a penitentiary where people will not be ill-treated but where the living will be spartan enough to encourage the prisoners when they have concluded their sentence to make a firm resolution never to return to jail. It is the absence of deterrents that has resulted in more crime. I hate to be pessimistic but unless the Minister, and the Government, face this problem in a determined way the crime rate will escalate here with unhappy consequences for us all.

I will be parochial at the outset and tell the Minister of the grave disappointment I felt this week when I was informed that the consultants appointed in connection with the building of a Garda station in Cavan town had been informed that the building would not be proceeding. I am aware that there is a grey area between the Department of Justice and the Office of Public Works as to where responsibility lies but this decision represents another blow to my area. The old station was abandoned by the Garda some time ago. They got out just in time or otherwise it would have fallen in on top of them. The Garda are now housed in what was a private house, accommodation which is totally inadequate. It would have been inadequate before the local station party was reinforced and is very unsatisfactory now. The Minister should reconsider the position with regard to that station. He may not be aware that there is a bit of a background to this.

(Limerick East): The Deputy said he got information. Could he tell me from whom and from where so that I can get it checked quickly for him. What Garda station was it?

Cavan town Garda station. As it is a Border town there are far greater numbers of gardaí there now and, while the need was great hitherto, it has become greater. There has been a problem about the site. Cavan Urban Council were promised that the site would be utilised and they reserved it for this purpose. They are beginning to kick. They are proving recalcitrant and, at some meetings two or three months ago, they stated that they were fed up waiting for the Office of Public Works to utilise the site and if they did not utilise it they would bring it back into their own use.

I might also mention my local station at Finea. The actual Garda station is in County Cavan, though the village, as the House knows, is a famous village in County Westmeath. We have not had a sergeant there for some time. I was interested in reading in the Minister's speech his indication that things have changed a great deal and consequently new methods have to be devised for dealing with a kind of runaway criminal.

There have been a number of breakings and enterings in that area and I gather some arrests were made as far south as Templemore in County Tipperary in connection with them. This is the kind of thing the Minister referred to in his speech. If he saw fit to appoint a sergeant to Finea as quickly as possible, this would be a help to that area. He will have a beautiful place to live in and, if he is able to cast a fly neatly, or to troll, the waters of Lough Sheelin are right beside him. In fact, the river flows past the Garda station and he can leave his boat just outside the Garda station and go straight up into the heart of the best trout lake in the country.

A flash back to the tourism Estimate.

I have no particular insights into the drugs issue but I want to back up what other Deputies have said about pushers. No mercy should be shown in driving the pushers out of circulation in our society. Big money is involved. This has also been referred to. A philosophy has been developed. When older people are advising young people about drugs this philosophy is brought into play: "After all, you people take a drink. That is a drug. Alcohol is a drug. You smoke. Nicotine is a drug. Why not tolerate the mildest of the other drugs which are now illegal?" This whole philosophy has been worked out and there is almost a Pavlovian response from young people when you refer to drugs. They come up with this argument. It is not an argument which holds up on close examination. The movement from the soft drugs into the hard drugs is very easy and has been proven to be the normal procedure. That philosophy should be attacked because the hard drugs are the real problem. They have arrived hot on the heels, so to speak, of the soft drugs which were defended by some sophisticated people in our society not so long ago.

With regard to catching big fish in the pushing line, I should like to say — and this is a criticism of the Garda if you like; I know they have difficulties; I have an admiration for the head of the Drug Squad because I knew him before he was recruited into the Drug Squad, and as far as I know he is from the same county as the Minister — that I cannot understand how a particular criminal on a particular day who was a big fish in this game was not watched. He was convicted afterwards. There is no point in blaming the bail system because obviously and patently it is too lax. On that occasion it would have struck me, if I were in charge of that operation, to have that individual watched all the time until the trial was over and until he was either convicted or acquitted. He was actually convicted.

I am glad to see that Loughan House is still being used by the Department of Justice. I had to endure a great deal of criticism of Loughan House in this House at one time. By the way people were talking about it one would have thought it was some kind of a first cousin to Devil's Island. It is a beautiful building, beautifully located with very fine facilities indeed. If one went down there now I do not think one could pick a more beautiful setting, with mountains in the background, a very famous lake nearby and a beautiful building.

I had a question down about what use was to be made of Loughan House — I think it is still on the Order Paper — but to give an idea of how slow we are in reaching questions the event has outstripped the question and Loughan House is now being used. I am glad for several reasons. The Minister has a very fine, dedicated staff there — I want to pay them that tribute — staff who did not want to be uprooted. They came to me, I put down a question to the Minister and, so slow are the workings of this House that it has not been reached yet.

I want to pay tribute to the people who embark on the education of the young prisoners —"prisoners" is perhaps a strong word for them, but I can tell the House there are some pretty tough little educandees in Loughan House. One must have patience, one must have faith, persistence, strength of will, but above all one must not give up heart. Talking to them one is impressed by their total dedication to continue on, because without that kind of courage one would be inclined to give up. On a broader scale the educational programmes available on television can benefit prisoners. It must be remembered, after all, that there are some excellent students among the prisoners. I shall not expand on it now but I hope the Minister will pay attention to that area. Being an educationalist himself I am sure my exhortation is hardly necessary.

The Minister referred to improved technology, improved transport, improved mobility for the Garda to deal with the increasing incidence of crime and vandalism. Also I would go along with what Deputy Tunney said in that it is important that the Garda should identify with local communities. Some of them are excellent in this regard. Whether it be boxing clubs, football clubs, swimming clubs or whatever all over the country, there are many dedicated members of the Garda Síochána who are doing a great deal of social work. Identification of culture, to which Deputy Tunney referred also, is important, although many people who were not born in the metropolis did adapt extremely well both to the metropolis and to youth work in the metropolis. I take it that his basic point is correct.

As we know during the year the lack of co-ordination in sentencing in the courts is something that has come up for criticism. There was one scandalous example during the year that was adequately dealt with in the House at the time. I am sure the able Presidents of the Judiciary at the various levels in the course of performing their duties in that role will apply themselves to this because it has an effect on public opinion if one judge releases somebody for a serious crime while another sentences harshly.

Deputy Flynn in making his contribution on the Trade, Commerce and Tourism Estimate — I think he was dealing with insurance at the time — referred to the problem of the blood and urine tests with regard to drunken driving. I do not think we should increase the permissible content. I find sometimes that chemistry is a hard master and that it is difficult — I shall not go any further than this — to season justice with mercy in the face of a chemical reading.

I should like to mention a matter in my constituency about which I wrote to the Department — it may have been to the Minister's predecessor — that is the staffing at Belturbet Garda station in County Cavan. It is a station on the Border. The people in Belturbet have approached me on a number of occasions about the running down of Garda strength there. Perhaps the Minister would study the question again and ascertain if he can be in relief of it.

The Public Record Office was mentioned by the Minister also. I am sure it would appeal to the Minister, as it does to me, that the Public Record office, where I did some minor studies at one time, should be buttressed to the maximum extent by the Minister by proper financing and by making facilities available to people who want to consult records there.

The Minister will have noticed that on the Order Paper I have three or four questions down about the courthouse in Cavan town. It is a fine classical building, built about 1810, with a Doric frontage. However, there has been trouble with the roof. A section of the roof has collapsed and there are whole areas of the courthouse which are just out of bounds now for the court. All the Circuit Court cases now must be tried in Bailieboro', County Cavan, which, as the Minister knows, is on the eastern border, near the Meath border and jurors may have to travel from Blacklion, which is at Belcoo, County Fermanagh, through Cavan town right to Bailieboro'. The formal question I have on the Order Paper asks what instructions the Minister has given the local authority in regard to the provisions of proper courthouse accommodation in Cavan town. I hope the Minister will address himself to that problem because there is great hardship, particularly for jurors and people who are using the courts as well.

The Minister referred to the Land Registry. I am grateful to him for clarifying all the functions of the Land Registry because I was tarring them all with the same brush. I am glad to see that it is in one area only there are long delays. But, God knows, the delays in that area are dreadful; there is no question or doubt about it. The Minister says that of course he is caught there by the ban on recruitment in the public service. I would suggest selective ignoring of the ban where there is a backlog of 12 months, as the Minister mentioned. There seems to be a slight lack of logic there in that I notice the Minister said somewhere else that the fees charged made the Land Registry self-supporting. If the fees make it selfsupporting I wonder if the Minister would look at the income and ascertain whether he could afford to employ some extra people without doing any injustice, damage or inflicting any wounds on the law which now forbids recruitment.

An Leas-Ceann Comhairle

I do not want to inflict any wounds on the Deputy, but there are 25 minutes remaining with Deputies Kenny and Harney offering until 10.15 p.m.

What does that mean?

I will finish then.

I would not agree with my colleague, Deputy Tunney, that we should adopt a Napoleonic system and regard people as guilty until proved innocent. I can understand how people would advocate that because of frustration at what is actually happening. The law's delays particularly in the High Court — the Minister spoke about it in his speech — have been proverbial since Shakespeare's time. Law is something that takes time and the Minister has taken steps to improve the position in the High Court.

Just one final comment on the Housing Act, 1982. A committee of the Fianna Fáil Party were asked to have a look at what was happening in the courts in regard to that Act and the report was pretty horrifying. There was grave hardship on old people who, despite the fact that there is an attempt at informality, are scared stiff about been hauled up in relation to their rents. I think the Minister and his officials could apply themselves to easing the plight of these old people who were never in court before and who are scared stiff at having to appear in court and are afraid they will lose their tenancies.

I take this opportunity of congratulating the Minister on his appointment. He has brought a new image to the office, a very necessary image, in restoring morale and the level of confidence in the Garda. It is essential a Minister should have a very balanced relationship with the Commissioner in eforts to detect, solve and prevent crime. Crime is taking a major proportion of the budget. In the Six Counties the British are spending £1.8 million, which is just half our budget here, and a fairly significant proportion of that budget goes in defence and policing activities. A substantial amount is also spent on crossBorder activities and security in Border regions. The Commissioner must be a man of absolute integrity. In the last six years we had one Commissioner removed from office for not doing his job and another forced, or allowed to leave, because he did not implement the conditions of his employment.

That is a most dubious statement.

I object formally to that statement.

The last Commissioner was excellent in every respect and he should be honoured for his work.

I am not questioning his integrity at all. The Garda Síochána are the guardians of the peace of Ireland and the Minister should ensure that is what they do. The war against crime must be intensified and criminals must be made to realise what they are up against in taking on the Garda. What has been said by others in regard to drugs and drug pushers has my fullest support. Drug pushers are the harbingers of human destruction and death. I would have no sympathy for them. No sympathy should be shown to them. No bail should be granted to them. Furthermore, mandatory minimum sentences should be imposed, sentences equal to the crime they commit on human society. Their only interest is to further their own financial position. Justice must be seen to be done and mandatory sentences must be imposed on all convicted drug pushers. In other countries pushers may be hanged or shot or have parts of their bodies removed. People who indulge in these activities deserve no mercy.

The work of the Drug Squad is to be commended. Three pushers were caught recently. I hope they catch many more. Social occasions are used by these pushers and the Garda are aware of this. Syringes have been found on the scene of these so-called social activities. This is something that needs to be examined. Recently a taxi driver told me that he gave a lift to a 17-year old who actually injected himself in the back of the taxi. He told me of another 23-year-old junky who needs £300 a day to get himself a "fix". Young people are under enormous pressures, as Deputy Wilson said. All they can see is the next "fix". Where they get the money or how is immaterial. They resort to violence to get the necessary funds and the end result is death.

The work of Jervis Street Hospital is to be commended and I hope that every facility will be given to that establishment to enable them to cope with the increasing number of young drug addicts. I understand some are as young as 13 and 14 years of age. Those responsible for this situation are the so-called barons who live in their castles at the expense of our youth. They must be given mandatory sentences. Deputy Woods was Minister for Health and he produced a very fine report on drugs. I would have hoped he would have gone further and ensured that the punishment fitted the crime. If the Governments of the world who concentrate funds now on nuclear missiles and space experimentation were to devote those funds to the eradication of opium that would help to solve the problem. Every effort will have to be made over the next few years to solve the problem.

The pilot area in my constituency has not worked to the satisfaction of the local people. The guardians of the peace, as the police are known, should be able to build up a relationship with the people in the areas they serve. It is not feasible to have squad cars from centres 20 or 25 miles away trying to police rural areas effectively.

There are valuable points in the pilot scheme. For instance, radio contact among the gardaí is invaluable. This is a small island and it is very difficult to do something without being noticed. People in rural Ireland are much more vigilant than people living in large sprawling urban estates who might not know their neighbours two doors away although they might be living there for a number of years. The increased transport facilities provided by the Department is also a valuable asset which should be fostered and strengthened. There is no point limiting the understanding of ordinary people in terms of the gardaí flashing lights on squad cars without their building up a relationship with members of the force to whom they can go if they need help.

The appointment of extra sergeants should be dealt with right away. Young gardaí coming from Templemore need leadership and they should be given an incentive to do their job properly. Over the years statements were made about the eligibility of people who enter the force. Many young intelligent people wish to join the Garda Síochána. This means the force will get the best people with intelligence, motivation and dedication. The Minister should spell out clearly that the interview for entrance to the Garda force is the competitive side of that examination. This will stop people saying there was political pull because if a person gets six honours in his leaving certificate and another person only gets a pass leaving certificate, the second person might be chosen because he made a better showing at the examination.

In regard to the breathalyser, there have been cases where people were caught whose livelihood depends on a licence. In fairness to the Garda it must be said that they have been more than courteous to everybody. In many instances borderline cases are warned by the Garda. In some States in America if a person is convicted of drunken driving he is given his licence to get to and from work and he cannot say that the sentence deprived him of his livelihood. I ask the Minister to look at this.

I am calling Deputy Harney. The Minister must get in at 10.15 p.m.

Like other Deputies I welcome the opportunity to contribute on this Estimate. Those of us who work as public representatives, particularly those who work in large urban areas as I do, realise the implications and the importance of the matters we are discussing being fully examined and precautions taken against those who are involved in crime and vandalism. No subject has taken up so much time in recent months than this topic. We have had many debates here and, while they have proved worthwhile in themselves, they have not led to a decrease in the rate of crime. That is very sad. Once there was a time when one could feel free to walk the streets of our large cities in safety. There was a time when one could sleep in one's bed and know nobody would break in and attack one. Sadly that is no longer the case. Only a few nights ago in my constituency close to my home a young woman lay sleeping in her bed while her husband was away and her children were sleeping in the rooms beside here. She was violently attacked and raped. That is a very sad thing to happen in a country which is predominantly Catholic and Christian. This kind of situation is occurring week in and week out.

Political difference does not come into it. We all want to eliminate crime. I believe that prevention is better than cure as regards crime and vandalism. While prevention is still the best method we must also provide adequate facilities — prisons and detention centres — to take these people, many of them very young, who are involved in crime.

As a society we have not spent enough time taking the necessary precautionary measures to ensure that many of our people will not drift into the easy way of life by getting involved in crime. I represent two of the newest towns in this county, Tallaght and Clondalkin. It must be said that we as a legislature have not taken the necessary precautionary measures to help these people by providing the necessary facilities to ensure that they do not get involved in crime and vandalism.

I have the honour to represent the Tallaght area, an area which has over 60,000 people and is the fastest growing in this country and in western Europe. Yet the Tallaght of 1983 still has the same Garda station it had in the early sixties when there was a population of only a few hundred. I say to the Minister, as I said to his predecessors, that that is not good enough. A town of that size must have a Garda station properly manned and equipped to cater for the population it is supposed to serve. Neither is it good enough that some days of the week the time of many gardaí is taken up witnessing the signatures of people signing for unemployment assistance. That is not the job of the Garda and they should not be expected to do it. That should be done by officials of the Department of Social Welfare. I hope that practice will be changed soon.

The Tallaght area deserves to be a Garda district in its own right; it is still a sub-district of the Rathfarnham area. That too is not good enough. The Tallaght Garda station should have more senior officiers. They need a superintendent and inspectors. It also needs, as does any large area, a female Garda officer because many crimes involve women, particularly crimes relating to family law. It should be essential that each Garda station in large urban areas would have at least one female Garda officer. That is not the case in Tallaght or Clondalkin and I hope the Minister will see his way to providing this area with a female officer who could look after the type of cases I have already referred to, such as the rape case. Only by having a female Garda can these cases by handled properly.

All our new towns and new centres of population should be provided with proper recreational facilities for our young people. Proper facilities in themselves will not always lead to the elimination of crime. However, they usefully take up the time of our young people. All centres should have properly equipped and properly managed sports and leisure facilities.

My colleague, Deputy Tunney, referred to the legal profession and in many instances I agree with what he said. People get very bad value for their money when employing a legal person. Why must one have a solicitor and then, if the case is to be taken before a court, junior and senior counsel? That is not necessary. Many court cases involve four or five legal people on each side. That is cumbersome, expensive and beyond the reach of the ordinary person. Our legal profession badly needs to be investigated. One simply needs a lawyer, rather than a solicitor and a barrister. I cannot understand why the present system is deemed essential even for the most minor cases and I ask the Minister to investigate our legal profession soon.

We must also examine our entire court system. The Minister dwelt on this in his speech, saying that many cases take quite some time to come before the courts. It is not just a question of changing the law with regard to bail, which is also necessary. These criminals must be brought before the court as quickly as possible and their cases dealt with. That cannot happen at present because we have not adequate court facilities. The Minister intends to increase the number of courts by two and that will alleviate the situation but I hope for further improvements in that area before long.

Family law has been talked about at some length in this House and outside it for quite some time. Of special interest to me is the question of family law reform, particularly the establishment of a system of family tribunals rather than having the cases coming before district courts. These cases need a proper forum where parents and children can be properly looked after. As an intermediary step, the Minister should examine the possibility of establishing a conciliation scheme, similar to those in other countries. That would operate side by side with the courts. The two parties in the marriage could get together with the conciliator and, it is hoped, some solution could be found to their problems which may not require court action. The present situation under which the two people in a marital dispute must come together in confrontation in the courtroom is not in the best interests of either themselves or of the children.

Having thought a lot about it, I have comments to make in relation to barring orders, having come across many who have been barred from the family home. In many cases barring orders are working to the discrimination of the male spouse in the marriage. Whilst I agree with the principle of granting barring orders and of the extension of their period under Fianna Fáil from three months to 12 months, we have not catered adequately for the barred spouse, in terms of maintenance payments which he must pay to his wife and in support of his children, nor have we catered for him in providing alternative accommodation. What can a man do who has been barred from his home if he must pay a substantial amount for the upkeep of his family? Where does he go for accommodation? We have not examined that aspect and we should.

Could the Deputy please conclude?

We are experiencing a recession when unemployment is rampant, inflation high, people have not much money and vandalism is growing at an enormous rate. I hope those of use who have the honour of serving on all sides in Dáil Éireann will come together. My party have recommended the establishment of a committee to try to find some solution to the distressing problems of crime and vandalism currently confronting us. If we do that, we will have served our people well during our time of office.

Limerick East): First, I should like to thank the Deputies who contributed to this debate. Many of the points raised have been dealt with in my speech in moving the Estimate, so there is probably no need to go over that ground again. I can see the concern shared by everybody and, in a sense, feel like somebody who has come in in the middle of the film. I do not know what the story was before I came in and cannot change that part of it. However, I hope to be able to change the progress of the film from now on, that certain changes can be made and that I will have the co-operation of the House in making these changes which will improve the situation.

One thing that struck me about the debate was something which was not in it rather than what was in it, that is, that nobody mentioned all the problems of subversive crime. That is probably because the level of subversive crime is now quite low. However, Deputies should remember that the subversives in prison are now taking up two of our major prisons, Portlaoise and Limerick. One of our major problems is the lack of prison space. The result of subversive activity has taken two prisons almost totally out of use for ordinary crime. Obviously, the time of many gardaí is taken up with preventing subversive crime and that should also be remembered by Deputies.

The point made most forcibly and with greatest concern in the House was that about the abuse of drugs. I share that concern. The situation is dreadful in that regard. The Government responded to it by setting up a Committee of Ministers at the meeting at Barrettstown in May. I hope that the report of that committee will be available shortly, because it will give us guidlines for proceeding with our efforts to eliminate this frightening problem.

Deputy Wilson made a point which we should all remember, that there is a milieu or a drug-takers' philosophy, a society susceptible to drug-taking and the work of the Garda will not prevent that. If young people, especially young, educated people in the universities out of middle-class families think that it is quite appropriate to smoke cannabis, it is then very difficult to blame deprived people who are being preyed on by drug pushers if they experiment with harder drugs. What is astounding in the use of heroin in Dublin city at the moment is how quickly it became a major problem. It is certainly a matter of major concern. I understand that we will get the report very quickly and I hope that we can act quickly on the submissions it contains.

I might point out to the House that the legislation which controls the use of drugs was passed in 1977 — the Misuse of Drugs Act. That is legislation for which the Minister for Health has responsibility, not the Minister for Justice. Consequently, amendments to that legislation would be more appropriate for the Minister for Health. I might point out to Deputy Woods, who made some very good suggestions on how to deal with the problem of drug abuse, that the legislation which controls the abuse of drugs came from the Department in which he was the Minister up to 14 December and that he had, as far back as September 1981, a report from the Attorney General advocating changes in the Misuse of Drugs Act. While I appreciate his concern and the validity of the suggestions he has made and while I agree personally with the idea of mandatory sentences for drug pushers, that is within the ambit of the Department of Health. That was the situation, too, when the Deputy was Minister for Health.

As the Minister knows very well, it is in the proposed Criminal Jurisdiction Bill, a draft of which was on the Minister's desk when he took office.

(Limerick East): It is not included in that Bill. I do not know where the Deputy got that information from. The Bill is being considered now by the Minister for Health and I hope will be amended.

There was a whole series of amendments included in that Bill at that time and a Bill to deal comprehensively with all of those was brought forward.

(Limerick East): The Deputy wishes to discuss other legislation, but I understand that we are forbidden by the rules of the House from doing so.

The Minister is putting the situation in a one-sided way and that is unfair.

(Limerick East): Much of the Deputy's contribution was valid in regard to drugs legislation and all I am saying is that as Minister for Health he had an opportunity to do something about such legislation but failed to do so.

This is a smear tactic on the part of the Minister even if he is being polite. The drugs problem as it relates to heroin developed in 1981. The Minister is aware of the figures. The study in which the figures can be found was set up by me as Minister.

(Limerick East): The Deputy is likely to be further upset about what I am about to say. It is not my intention to upset him but a charge has been made and I must rebut it formally.

I hope the Minister will tell us whether the chief superintendent has been removed from the Drug Squad and, if so, if he will be replaced.

(Limerick East): I can give the Deputy that information immediately. Decisions as to the number and rank of the members to be assigned to particular duties or units are matters for the Garda authorities. Following a recent review of resources aimed at making better use of existing manpower, the drug squad unit based at Dublin Castle and the operational drug unit formerly based at Garda Headquarters have been amalgamated under the control of a detective superintendent at Dublin Castle. He has responsibility also for the serious crime squad. It is intended that the amalgated drug unit and the serious crime squad will in future work more closely together in a combined effort to combat drug offences and other drug-related serious crime. I suggest that they are being quite effective.

The Minister is——

(Limerick East): I have very little time left and I cannot continue if the Deputy is to persist in interrupting me.

Has the superintendent been transferred?

Deputy Woods should allow the Minister to continue.

I am only asking a question to which I want a yes or no answer.

(Limerick East): Deputy Woods made some critical references to the DPP and implied clearly that in some cases the Government or I have prevailed on him to take certain decisions. This is a charge against me but it is a charge also against the DPP because it would be a serious impropriety on his part to have allowed himself to be influenced in that way. Because of what has been said I wish to put certain facts on the record.

The office of Director of Public Prosecutions is an independent statutory office and the director exercises his functions independently of the Minister for Justice and of the Government. The suggestion that I made political representations, or any other kind of representations, to him about any of the cases in question is untrue. It is wrong of the Deputy to have made those charges against one who is not here to defend himself and who obviously is not free to embark on public explanations for his decisions.

The Deputy has tried to give his allegations an air of credibility by suggesting that the director took appeals to a higher court in cases which had what the Deputy regards as a political complexion while no such appeal was taken in the Fairview case. Deputy Woods asks the House to believe that those cases were comparable and he suggested clearly that an appeal in the Fairview case would have been an ordinary part of the judicial process just as is the case with other appeals.

The facts are very different. An appeal against the suspension of a sentence is so far removed from being a normal part of the judicial process that, so far as my information goes, not one such appeal has ever been taken. The right of the prosecution to appeal against a decision of the Central Criminal Court is not conferred by statute but was recognised by the Supreme Court as a right. An analysis of the judgments shows, however, that it is not something that ought to be done simply because the DPP might think the decision was excessively lenient. In sharp contrast, the appeals which the Deputy implies were motivated politically were not appeals against the leniency of the decision of the court. They were appeals on points of law under a power that is provided for by statute and that is exercised freely and frequently. There are no constraints on the prosecution in relation to appeals on points of law such as there are where what is at issue is a matter involving the exercise of judicial discretion.

I am dealing with this matter purely on a factual basis by placing on record that the Deputy has attempted to compare a situation where an appeal would be unprecedented with a situation where appeals could fairly be said to be commonplace. I will not comment beyond that because to do so would mean that I would be commenting on the merits of the individual decisions by the DPP. To do that, even where it was done in his defence, would be inappropriate because he is an independent statutory officer.

The Governor of Portlaoise Prison is a civil servant for whom I have responsibility so in that respect I am obliged to set the record straight. What happened was that in the context of certain overtime restrictions in the prisons area which I announced on 9 March last, the Prison Officers' Association made a statement which was reported in the media that the Governor of Portlaoise Prison had stated that any reduction in staffing levels at the prison would interfere with security. This represented a misunderstanding of the governor's position as communicated to me in regard to the proposed restrictions on overtime.

The governor issued a statement on 10 March verifying his position in this regard. It is not my intention to raise the temperature of the House but once charges are made I am obliged to set the record straight.

The Minister did not mention the prison rules issued on behalf of the DPP.

(Limerick East): Deputy Wilson asked about a Garda station in Cavan town. We have checked the information in this regard. The Office of Public Works had a site for a new station in Farnham Street but a clause in the prescribed agreement between them and the local authority provided that if work did not start on 1 January 1983, the site would revert to the local Authority. That was a condition attaching to the purchase of the site. The Office of Public Works were not in a position to start the work on 1 January last and the local authority insisted on having the site back. The OPW are looking for a new site. There is no proposal not to provided a new station and neither is there any downgrading in the ranking order of the proposal.

There is no row or anything of that nature between the OPW and the local authority on this matter.

(Limerick East): But I am sure that if the local authority could continue to provide the site, the matter could be speeded up. I am glad of the contributions made by many Deputies but obviously I cannot deal specifically with all of them. However, there is one point I would make for the information of the House and it is this: the areas of my Department obviously interlink whether it is the Garda side, the prison side or the courts side. Therefore, reform in one area affects another. In recent months there have been many convictions, many arrests and many crimes detected. One of the major difficulties in this whole area is the lack of prison accommodation. This is where matters begin to be difficult. The Commissioner has put more gardaí on the beat so we presume that this will lead to more detection but if more crime is detected, more people go through the courts and so we need more prison spaces. If we reform the courts so that the backlog of cases is reduced and so that procedures are simplified the same number of people move more speedily through the system and, consequently, more prison space is necessary.

If one reforms the criminal law as I intend doing — I hope to have the relevant Bill ready before the commencement of the next session — and if one gives extra powers to the Garda, the presumption is that there will be more detection and conviction. Again, this means a need for more prison spaces. If we put this in the context of a situation in which 1,200 people were shed from the prison system last year and also in the context of there being no policy decisions outstanding that would give us any prison space until 1987, one realises the enormity of the difficulty and the desirability of having alternatives even if Deputies would be somewhat critical of alternatives such as those contained in Criminal Justice (Community Service) Bill which is now going through the Seanad.

I hope some of our questions will be answered.

(Limerick East): I will reply to them.

Vote put and agreed to.
Barr
Roinn