Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Tuesday, 3 Dec 1985

Vol. 362 No. 5

Housing (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill, 1985: Second Stage.

I move: "That the Bill be now read a Second Time."

The Housing (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill, 1985, the debate on which we are now opening is a wide-ranging and significant piece of housing legislation. I shall start by summarising briefly the main objectives of the Bill, these are,

—to establish a new statutory framework for the local authority housing programme so as to ensure that it caters adequately for the housing needs of particular categories of persons such as the homeless, travellers, the aged and so on;

—to give additional responsibilities for the housing of homeless persons to housing authorities and to increase their powers to enable them to meet these new responsibilities;

—to provide statutory backing for a number of schemes of grants and subsidies which were introduced in recent years including the mortgage subsidy scheme, the £5,000 grant scheme for persons surrendering local authority or Army accommodation to build or buy a private house, the scheme of assistance for the provision of housing by voluntary organisations and the reconstruction of defective low cost and other rented local authority houses;

—to make a number of other amendments to housing legislation and to other codes in matters relating to housing.

The Bill is, therefore, the most far-reaching housing measure brought forward since the Housing Act, 1966. That Act has served us well but it is inevitable that after almost 20 years a substantial recasting of its provisions should have become necessary in the light of the changes which have taken place in the housing situation. Happily the priority of our housing programme is no longer that of clearing extensive areas of unfit housing and relieving acute and widespread overcrowding. The primary concern and direction of housing policy must now be to ensure that categories of persons such as the homeless, the aged, the disabled, travellers and single parent families, etc. have access to housing suitable and adequate for their needs.

The emphasis placed by the Bill on the provision of housing for those in need is the most fundamental restatement of the objectives of housing policy since the Labourers (Ireland) Act, 1883, and the Housing of the Working Classes Act, 1890. The Housing Act, 1966, repealed more than 50 earlier Housing Acts and replaced the separate rural and urban housing codes based respectively on the Labourers and the Housing of Working Classes Acts, with a uniform housing code. However, it retained in many of its provisions the primary concern of the earlier housing codes namely the elimination of slums and overcrowding. Many of the provisions of the Act reflected this emphasis. I instance in particular sections 53, 55 and 60 imposing respectively duties on housing authorities to prepare estimates of housing needs, building programmes and schemes of letting priorities.

Section 8 of the Bill which replaces section 53 reflects the broader objectives of housing policy which have emerged in more recent years and which it is fair to say have, in many cases, been acknowledged in practice by local authorities in advance of any revised statutory provisions. Under section 8 a housing authority may, as they see fit, and shall if requested by the Minister, prepare an estimate of the existing and prospective housing requirements of their area. The authorities are required in making these estimates to have regard not only to housing conditins in their area but also to the number of persons living in temporary accommodation; expected changes in the size and structure of the population of the area and, to the extent they consider appropriate, the housing requirements of persons residing outside their functional area. These estimates relate to the overall housing requirements of an area and not solely the needs to be met by local authority housing. The provisions of section 8 of the Bill and the broader perspective it embraces are good illustrations of the wider horizons of housing policy in the new Bill.

I now propose, rather than considering the Bill on a section by section basis, which we shall be doing in any event on Committee Stage, to address in some detail the main impact of the Bill on the local authority housing system, in regard to the homeless, the voluntary housing movement and the travellers. I will then deal with the other significant provisions in the Bill more or less in the order that they occur in the Bill.

On local authority housing the provisions in the Bill relating to management and letting of local authority housing are designed to meet the commitment contained in paragraph 5.88 of the national plan and I quote:

The statutory provisions on the management and letting of local authority housing are being reviewed to ensure that the needs of particular categories of persons, such as the homeless, the aged, the disabled, travellers and single parent families will get due priority in the formulation of building programmes and the allocation of tenancies.

Successive Governments have committed enormous financial resources to the local authority housing programme over the years. It is necessary, therefore, for the Government to ensure as far as possible that these resources are used in an efficient and cost effective manner and they are distributed fairly having regard to the type and severity of the housing need in each local authority area.

Section 9 provides for an annual assessment of the housing needs in each area which are to be met by the housing authority. An important aspect of the new arrangements is that housing authorities will be required to notify certain other housing authorities, health boards and voluntary bodies providing accommodation, shelter or welfare of their intention to carry out the assessment. This will enable those bodies to bring to the attention of the authority persons, in particular homeless persons, who are in need of accommodation but who may not have applied to the local authority for housing.

In carrying out their annual assessments the authorities will be required specifically to have regard to the needs of the homeless, members of the travelling people, persons living in unfit or overcrowded accommodation, persons sharing involuntarily their accommodation, elderly or disabled persons or persons in need of housing for medical or compassionate reasons and also of persons who may be living in adequate accommodation but simply unable to reasonably meet the cost of that accommodation. These are the target categories of need which the local authority housing programme will address in future. Persons in these categories who reside outside the functional area of the authority may be included in the assessment. This latter provision meets the objectives of the Housing Act, 1984 which was enacted following a Supreme Court ruling to restore the power of local authorities to house persons from outside their functional area and allows the Housing Act, 1984 to be repealed.

The annual assessments of housing need are to be submitted to the Minister so that he has available to him the most up-to-date assessment of housing needs in each local authority-in advance of the determination of the annual capital allocation for the construction of local authority housing. This will help towards a fair and equitable distribution as between local authorities with due regard to the different categories of need, and its extent, in the different areas. In looking at the provisions of section 9, I would also direct the attention of Deputies to section 17 (1) which requires local authorities to reflect in their building programmes the range of needs and the different requirements of the various categories included in an assessment under section 9. Under section 17 (2) a county council shall be deemed to have and always to have had, power to provide dwellings and sites in a town commissioner's area; this provision is doing no more than putting on a definite footing what has in practice been happening for many years. Section 17 (3) enables a county council and town commissioners in their area to enter into an agreement that the county council will be responsible for the management and control of any or all of the town commissioners' houses. This power will be particularly useful where the reconstruction of town commissioners' houses under section 12, to which I shall be coming to later, is proposed.

Housing authorities will be required within one year of the commencement of section 11 to make new schemes to determine the priority to be afforded to persons in the letting of local authority dwellings. These new schemes will address the categories of housing need identified in the annual housing assessment under section 9. They will also provide that the housing authority may from time to time set aside a particular number or proportion of the houses becoming available for letting for particular categories of need and that priority shall be given to persons in those categories in the letting of the dwellings so set aside.

An important new provision of the schemes of letting priorities will be that where a housing authority have reason to believe that an applicant has deliberately depressed his housing conditions in order to improve his prospects of obtaining local authority housing, the authority may disregard the present housing conditions for the purposes of determining priority. The making or amending of a scheme of letting priorities or the setting aside of houses for particular categories of housing need are functions reserved to the elected members.

Section 12 provides for the scheme, announced in paragraph 5.91 of the national plan, of assistance to housing authorities for the reconstruction of "low cost" and other local authority dwellings which have suffered serious deterioration due to design or construction defects or because of their age. I am optimistic that this initiative on the part of the Government will have a major impact in helping housing authorities to overcome the problems of these estates and ensure that the houses continue to provide good accommodation. Houses on the estates concerned which have been sold by the authority may be reconstructed as part of a scheme to improve dwellings still owned by the authority. It is envisaged that this power will be used where it is necessary to achieve satisfactory rehabilitation of the estate as a whole. In such cases the owner of the house will be expected to meet half the cost of the works to his house. Loan charges subsidy will be provided to cover 80 per cent of the cost of the works to rented houses and 40 per cent in the case of houses which had been sold by the authority.

Where a housing authority reconstruct houses under section 12 they may also be required to carry out environmental and other improvement works to the estate. Section 19 will provide for greater flexibility in the ways that housing authorities may, with the approval of the Minister, use their housing capital receipts. I envisage that this provision will be used to assist housing authorities in meeting the cost of these environmental and other improvement works to local authority housing estates which are suffering from anti-social behaviour, vandalism and other community problems.

Section 24 amends the existing statutory provisions regarding local authority housing subsidy. In addition to the loan charge subsidies now in operation, and those for the reconstruction of houses under section 12, subsidy may also be paid in respect of the provision of hostels by local authorities, which could be of importance in the context of accommodating the homeless, and in respect of the provision of sites and ancillary facilities for travellers. I will refer again to these latter aspects.

While on the local authority housing programme I would like to refer to section 4 which deals with the £5,000 grant scheme announced by the Government in Building on Reality. The concept that a grant should be provided to assist better-off tenants of local authority dwellings to provide their own accommodation by building or purchasing a private house was an imaginative and, I am pleased to say, highly successful initiative. It has long been recognised that the financial circumstances of very many local authority tenants can improve considerably over time compared with their circumstances when they were first given a house by a local authority. The fact that over 175,000 dwellings provided by local authorities have been bought by tenant purchasers is testimony to this fact. However, the purchase of a rented dwelling by the tenant removes that house from the local authority stock whereas those availing of the £5,000 grant release a vacant dwelling for reletting to persons on the local authority waiting list.

This scheme has been very widely welcomed and has been even more successful than we had anticipated. In 1985, I expect that over 2,000 houses will be surrendered to local authorities under this scheme and I anticipate that the number in 1986 will be greater still. The combined effect of the high level of local authority house building pursued by the Government since we took office in 1982 and the dramatic impact of the £5,000 grant scheme has reduced significantly for the first time in many years the waiting lists and the pressure of demand for local authority housing.

Emigration helps, too.

It has also given local authorities considerable flexibility in arranging transfers and the more effective and suitable use of their housing stock. It has also allowed local authorities to offer accommodation to significant numbers of single homeless persons who would otherwise have had relatively low priority on the local authority waiting lists. Finally, the grant has provided a welcome stimulus to the house building sector of the building industry as up to half of the grants paid are in respect of new private houses.

Since the introduction of the grant in October 1984 the Government have extended its application to certain members of the Permanent Defence Force vacating Army accommodation and this aspect is also provided for in section 4.

Section 4 (3) provides effectively that where a tenant purchaser surrenders his house to the local authority, the authority may pay the conveyancing costs, no stamp duty will be payable on such a conveyance and, if the tenant purchaser has received a subsidy under the former "low rise mortgage scheme", he will not have to repay this subsidy despite any condition to this effect contained in the original transfer order vesting the house in the tenant purchaser.

Homelessness is the most glaring and distressing of all the special housing needs which have come to the fore in recent years. However, remarkable progress has been made by local authorities and to a lesser extent by voluntary bodies in providing decent accommodation for homeless persons. In other countries whose legislative provisions we are encouraged to emulate, there are proportionately far higher levels of homelessness than in this country. The problem of homelessness in this country is most acute in the case of single homeless persons and it is primarily to alleviate their position that the Government have brought forward the proposals contained in this Bill. The fact that the number of homeless persons is relatively small is not an excuse for leaving the existing system as it stands but deserves mention as it reflects the considerable achievement of local authorities and of successive Governments who have financed a large scale social housing programme over the years. This programme has ensured that relatively few of our population will suffer the hardship of homelessness. However, there has been genuine and legitimate concern that single homeless persons were being afforded a relatively low priority for housing which effectively, in periods of high demand for local authority housing, meant that such housing was unlikely to be offered to them.

The measures contained in this Bill are designed as a response to this problem and to ensure, simply and as far as humanly possible, that if a person is unfortunate enough to become homeless that accommodation will be made available to him. The Bill will assist homeless persons in two main ways:

—first, the needs of homeless persons will be fully integrated and recognised throughout all stages of the local authority housing programme;

—second, specific new responsibilities and powers are being entrusted to housing authorities in relation to the accommodation of the homeless.

I shall deal in more detail with these two aspects but before doing so I feel it would be helpful to review some of the background to these proposals.

Deputies will be aware that for many years there has been a debate whether local authorities or health boards were primarily responsible for providing accommodation for homeless persons. Section 54 of the Health Act, 1956, in fact placed a statutory duty on health boards to provide shelter and maintenance to homeless persons. Such shelter was usually provided in county homes or similar institutions. However, the distinction between the need for shelter, which was the responsibility of the health board, and the need for housing, which was properly a function of the housing authority, was never clear in practice. With increasing concern at the existence of homelessness in a society with relatively high standards of housing and material well-being, it was clearly unacceptable that a small number of the most deprived persons in the community should appear to fall between the limits of the responsibilities of the health boards and the local authorities. It was to resolve this, that the Ad Hoc Group on Homelessness were established with representatives of a number of Departments including my own and representatives of the health boards and the local authorities. The report of the ad hoc group was published in December 1984 and copies of the report are available in the Dáil Library.

The proposals in the Bill follow the main recommendations of the ad hoc group and, in particular, that primary responsibility for the housing needs of homeless persons should reside with the local housing authority. This is not to say that housing authorities will be responsible for all homeless persons no matter what their circumstances. In accordance with the recommendations of the ad hoc group, local authorities will not have responsibility for homeless young people, those incapable of living independently in a dwelling or for homeless persons who are in need of institutional care or other support. These categories of persons must necessarily remain the concern of the health boards.

Following the publication of the ad hoc committee's report my Department wrote to local authorities requesting the establishment of liaison arrangements between local authorities and health boards. These arrangements should be such as to ensure that one or other of those bodies would accept responsibility for each individual homeless person coming to their attention or that a person is referred from one to the other only with prior agreement. The majority of local authorities are, I am pleased to say, having regard to the recommendations of the ad hoc committee in their dealings with the homeless in advance of this legislation. This brings me to the final general point which I would wish to make regarding homelessness before returning to the specific provisions contained in the Bill.

It has been repeatedly alleged that the Government were indifferent to the plight of the homeless or were doing nothing for the homeless because we could not lend support to the Housing (Homeless Persons) Bill introduced in the Seanad by Senator Brendan Ryan. Senator Ryan's Bill contained a number of serious shortcomings and its enactment would not have solved the problem of homelessness. It would rather have created more problems by artificially and arbitrarily dividing the housing problem in a way that would not reflect the relative patterns of need of families and individuals. The allegation that, in the absence of legislation, nothing is being done for the homeless is false and unfounded. For example, local authorities have, particularly since the introduction of the £5,000 grant, been in a position to offer accommodation to increasing numbers of homeless persons. In addition, the Government completely revised the scheme of assistance for voluntary housing organisations providing accommodation for certain categories of housing need. The scheme which offered a £1,000 grant per unit with a discretionary and uncertain level of annual subsidy was replaced with effect from 1 March 1984 with a scheme offering 100 per cent subsidised loans of up to £16,000 per unit — effectively a £16,000 grant per unit of accommodation provided. In addition, the Government extended the scheme to include, for the first time, the provision of accommodation for homeless persons. While a considerable number of voluntary bodies have provided accommodation for elderly persons under the scheme, I would like to see more voluntary bodies bringing forward projects to assist homeless persons. I shall later be announcing further improvements to this scheme designed to enhance the contribution the voluntary housing organisation can make to the accommodation of disadvantaged categories of persons.

Section 2 of the Bill defines a homeless person. The definition is quite straightforward and does not seek, for example, to establish grades of homelessness or particular priority needs etc. Basically, a person who has no accommodation available to him or who lives in a hostel, night shelter or other such institution because he has no other available accommodation is regarded as homeless. To extend the definition to include, for example, persons living in unsatisfactory accommodation could only obscure the great need of those who are actually without shelter and impede an appropriate response to their acute plight. Some criticisms have also been voiced at the provision of section 2(2) that a person is not to be regarded as homeless if his lack of accommodation is due to a deliberate act or omission on his part. This is simply a necessary and reasonable precaution against abuses. It is not intended nor can it be applied by housing authorities to avoid their responsibility in ensuring accommodation is made available to persons who are homeless as a result of a genuine lack of foresight or capacity.

Debate adjourned.
Barr
Roinn