Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Wednesday, 12 Mar 1986

Vol. 364 No. 8

Adjournment Debate. - Rowntree-Mackintosh Factory.

I thank you for giving me the opportunity to raise this unfortunate intended cut-down on jobs at the Rowntree-Mackintosh factory. This is a very old factory, well established in the Inchicore-Kilmainham area. Its workforce are mainly drawn from the Ballyfermot-Inchicore area, which has suffered a high unemployment rate in the past number of years. Therefore, the intended cutback on jobs will cause tremendous hardship in the area.

The factory used to be Van Houten's before 1935-36 and then it became known as the old Choc Coid Cocoa Works before it became Rowntrees. In 1960 there was an amalgamation with Mackintosh. There are 560 people working there now, a tremendous workforce in any one factory, given the tendency in modern industrial premises to cut back on workforces. The reason for the large workforce is that it manufactures very labour intensive products.

The unfortunate thing about this cutback of 380 jobs is that the labour intensive output of the factory, the products they are putting out, are the ones affected. That is the reason given for the cutback of jobs. The factory had a troubled industrial relations history up to 1984 when there was a loss of £428,000, which was attributed largely to a tenweek strike. Profits had been declining and unfortunately in the previous couple of years there had not been a good profit flow.

Much of the criticism levelled at the workforce ended in 1984. Since then there has not been the loss of a single hour of production. People may be inclined to blame the unions — in a long established company like this there were nine different unions — but they worked together well of late. The Amalgamated Transport and General Workers Union forewarned of the possibility of this cutback happening if the company did not invest in new plant and new technology and if it did not, like some other companies in this industry, become streamlined and concentrate on single products in the different factories. Rowntree-Mackintosh are unfortunate in the sense that there are several other plants owned by Rowntree-Mackintosh in Britain and Ireland and the Kilmainham factory is being sacrificed by the parent company. It has been suggested that the Dublin factory would become a warehouse only, providing work for only 120 people.

There has been a vote of confidence by the company by investing £1,500,000 in three lines being manufactured there. The company have admitted that they failed to build up improved exports, and blamed uncompetitive high production costs and a bad industrial realations record that has been described as one of the worst in the country — that is according to The Irish Times of 7 March.

I regard that as unfair given the response of the workforce and the unions in the past couple of years. This factory may be a sacrificial lamb, being the Irish operation of a mainly British company, and the labour intensive Irish sector may be sacrificed. There has been a reliance on a costly low volume product and a failure to centralise the manufacture of individual products at one location. This could have been avoided by management if they had had a different approach to production.

This plant has been the source of stable employment for one of the most deprived parts of the city. In Inchicore only 4 per cent of the population get a crack at third level education and they make up 28 per cent of the population of St. Patrick's Institution and Mountjoy. In Ballyfermot, from which a large number of the workers come, an area with between 40,000 and 50,000 people, only 1 per cent get a crack at third level education and they make up 17 per cent of St. Patrick's Institution and Mountjoy. This disemployment is being visited on them on top of all their other problems.

I draw the Minister's attention to the history of job losses in those two areas. With the shutdown of Killeen Paper Mills some years ago there was a loss of 750 jobs, never to be replaced. The shutdown of Clondalkin Paper Mills caused 470 job losses, but because it was saved and reopened by the Government there will be a return of 280 jobs, leaving a net loss of 190 jobs. Within a couple of hundred yards of that factory we lost the Swan Laundry and a couple of hundred yards down the road we had the closure of Booth Poole some years ago. We had the closure of the Spa Road, Inchicore, works where they made buses for many years. We had a huge cutback in the Inchicore Engineering Works. The area is unfortunate and it needs careful attention.

It seems to be even worse than Cork. We had the doubtful distinction of being the worst in the country, but you seem to be getting ahead of us.

Maybe we are not shouting loudly enough. People do not often realise that one third of the population is in Dublin. We have areas with huge numbers and huge job losses but we are inclined to take them for granted. It is devastating in certain areas. In Ballyfermot there is an unemployment rate of 20 per cent. In Clondalkin, in certain streets and small estates there is a 60 per cent to 70 per cent unemployment rate. There is very little chance of new business coming to Ballyfermot or Inchicore where only about 2 per cent of the population would be self-employed, though you would have a figure of about 11 per cent in a place like Dún Laoghaire.

Decentralisation is the answer.

We lost 450 jobs recently in Mostek and there had been a loss of 280 previously. A clothing manufacturing business was to be set up in the constituency which would have provided 1,000 jobs. Because of some reason, perhaps pressure brought to bear, it was moved to another constituency in Dublin, which decision caused much despair. The Government had tremendous success, despite opposition from the building construction industry, in boosting the provision of housing by means of the Housing Finance Agency although the Opposition tried to strangle that agency. There was also the help given by the £5,000 grant. About 100 people have taken advantage of that grant to move house and go to different jobs. These have been replaced by about 100 homeless people, probably none with jobs. I am trying to bring home to the Minister the hardship visited on such an area as the Liffey Valley community by the loss of so many jobs. I also have great sympathy with those who have suffered by the same hardship in Deputy Lyon's Cork constituency and in the Cork area generally, but he will forgive me for concentrating on trying to help those who often cannot speak for themselves.

I am here to back the Deputy. That is my reason for being here.

I thank the Deputy. The Rowntree-Mackintosh decision was delivered, as these decisions usually are, as a bombshell to the workers. Any company fortunate enough to be so labour intensive, having such a large number of workers, must be worried about their future in this day and age. A great deal of blame must be laid on the management because at the other side of the city a very successful arrangement was made by Cadbury's to make most of the chocolate flake for all Britain and Ireland. By specialising in that area, they have succeeded in keeping a very large number of people working, about 1,100, and in expanding.

I am glad to see that Rowntree-Mackintosh's other plant at Mallow has not been affected adversely. This factory is engaged in making chocolate crumb and their 70 workers will continue to be employed on that side of the business. The plant used 60 million gallons of milk last year, 16,000 tons of sugar and the output of 870 farms in the region. I spoke directly to the management this evening. I hope that the investment of £1½ million in the three lines of products which they continue to manufacture is a vote of confidence in the future of the plant and that they will be able to maintain the 180 remaining jobs — I had given this as 224 jobs.

I hope it will not be the intention to use the Inchicore plant as a warehouse for company products imported from Britain. The IDA have recognised the problems and are looking for import substitution but the lines which Rowntree-Mackintosh are continuing to manufacture are high cost products, the most popular lines in Britain and Ireland such as Kit-Kat, Rolo and Smarties. I hope these products will not be made in Britain in the future.

The Minister cannot work miracles but I ask him to bear in mind the devastation caused in this part of the city and to ask the IDA to investigate the possibility of more labour intensive factories for that area. I ask him to bear in mind that this is a disadvantaged area and that the educational and career opportunities are extremely limited. I am sure I have the support of Deputies O'Keeffe and Lyons in my efforts for the continuance of the Mallow plant. The Minister should ask Rowntree-Mackintosh if they could put some specialised products into their Irish plant which could supply Britain and Ireland, as Cadbury's have done. This would give secure employment.

We appear to be the sacrificial lambs and it is the Irish jobs which are being taken over. The Irish workers have contributed down through the decades in building up the Rowntree-Mackintosh plant, in supplying the necessary labour in the form of a working pool which has faithfully served the plant owners, in some cases for 40 years. There is room for specialisation in the line of children's sweets.

I hope the redundancy agreements into which the company will enter will be generous, bearing in mind the long service of most of the workers. I am very much aware of the difficulties in providing large numbers of jobs, but I hope that Rowntree-Mackintosh will give an assurance that the maximum number of jobs will be retained and that if the IDA can do anything in the form of grants, incentives or the introduction of new lines, they will do so. This could mean a utilisation of the spare capacity brought about by the moving out of a large number of people.

If the plant were used as a warehouse for imported sweets, it would be the worst of all possible worlds because we would not have the employment and there would be a drain of purchasing power.

I thank the Ceann Comhairle for allowing me to raise this matter on the Adjournment and I would mention one thing which should be a source of great encouragement to the Minister and to all here. When Clondalkin Mills in the same constituency closed down, that caused the loss of the 480 jobs. However, after a battle we got the mill reopened again. We got back 280 jobs but the spin-off included at least another 500 jobs. The consumables in that mill include chemicals, transport, waste paper, pallets, and engineering services, and in the surrounding districts there is also the spending power of the workforce and small businesses and industries have been able to survive as a result of this measure. I ask the Minister to examine this urgently and carefully, to enter into negotiations with the management and to meet the workers' deputations.

On 6 March 1986, this firm announced that they planned to rationalise their Irish operations and as a result it would be necessary to lay off 380 employees out of a total workforce of 560 to take effect in September 1986. This is a commercial decision by the firm and as such the Deputy will appreciate that the level of influence which I or anybody else can exert on events is limited. However, being mindful of the need to maintain employment at the highest level possible the Industrial Development Authority have acted promptly and have arranged to enter into immediate discussions with the firm in an effort to secure that end. As a result of this initiative a meeting was held between the Industrial Development Authority and Rowntree-Mackintosh and these discussions are ongoing. The Deputy will appreciate that I cannot pre-empt the outcome of these discussions, but I can assure him that the Industrial Development Authority, and other State agencies, will do everything possible to ensure that redundancies are kept to an absolute minimum. I will help as far as I can on that score.

The firm in formulating their rationalisation programme cited a series of reasons for the proposed lay-offs. Among these the difficult competitive conditions being experienced by the company were mentioned along with high production costs and surplus capacity within the overall Rowntree-Mackintosh Group. Having regard to the surplus production capacity position, the firm were of the view that, because of this, major investment in their plant at Inchicore was not possible, and the rationalisation programme announced was in line with the trend already under way in the United Kingdom. I should mention for the Deputy's information that in the chocolate industry internationally employment has been falling. In the United Kingdom, for example, two of the major producers in this sector have shed approximately 5,000 jobs between them. While it would be nice to think that Ireland could escape this trend, unfortunately this is not the case. Ireland enjoys no single advantage in manufacturing terms as against any other location, apart of course, from the crumb sector in which milk supply is of great importance. Overall the industry has performed well in difficult trading conditions and indeed it is worth noting that Ireland remains a net exporter of chocolate and chocolate products. Exports of chocolate products, for example, increased in value terms by 30 per cent approximately over the past three years.

Following on Ireland's entry into the EC artificial barriers to trade cannot be introduced and therefore there can be no question of such measures being used. Quite clearly, in any event, it would not be in Ireland's interest to contemplate measures of this sort in view of the fact that Ireland benefits considerably from exports generally and priority must be given to ensuring that this position is not in any way threatened.

The reorganisation plan, as I have stated, will regrettably result in 380 redundancies but is seen as necessary to secure the remaining 180 jobs for the future. I might say that the Department or the Industrial Development Authority had not got prior knowledge in relation to the company's intentions. This is not meant to be a criticism of the company who are, in fact, giving advance notice of six months before redundancies take effect. In this regard, the firm point out that they are giving a lead-in period to enable employees as much time as possible to seek alternative employment opportunities and to provide adequate time for consultations regarding settlement arrangements.

For the House's information this reorganisation plan will not effect a Rowntree-Mackintosh processing operation, which produces chocolate crumb, located in Mallow. The plant in Mallow has provided a huge success and last year used large volumes of domestic raw materials thus generating considerable economic activity in the region. The plant also exports a substantial amount of its produce and in addition provides an important outlet for a large number of farms in the Mallow region. The employment content in the Mallow plant is comparatively small — 81 or 82 people.

As I have already stated, this is a commercial decision taken by the company and I am hopeful that Rowntree-Mackintosh will continue to maintain a presence in this country and that the future viability, of an admittedly scaled down operation, is secure. I can assure the Deputy that everything possible will be done by the Department and the relevant State agencies to ameliorate the impact of the redundancies. To this end the IDA will impress on the firm the need to re-examine their rationalisation plans in order to reduce to the absolute minimum the number of redundancies which they must implement, and they will also assess the practicalities of providing additional employment generating projects in the area, as was requested by Deputy Skelly.

The IDA will also be pursuing with the Rowntree-Mackintosh Group the possibilities of locating new products in this country and the idea has already been put to the local management. As I said, all these negotiations are ongoing and I am hopeful that come September the workers' position will not be as bleak as it appears at the moment.

The Dáil adjourned at 11 p.m. until 10.30 a.m. on Thursday, 13 March 1986.

Barr
Roinn