Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Wednesday, 30 Apr 1986

Vol. 365 No. 11

Ceisteanna — Questions. Oral Answers. - Raid on Libya.

6.

asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs if the Government received any advance notification from the US Government of its intention to launch an attack on Libya; if the Government have received any communications from the US authorities since the attack took place; if the Government have made any representations to the US Government on the attack, particularly in view of the large number of civilian casualties arising from it, and the Government's stated policy of opposition to all acts of terrorism; and if he will make a statement on the matter.

21.

asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs if he will make a statement on the Government's present attitude to the American air raid on Tripoli and Benghazi; and whether Ireland will resist any proposed EC sanctions against Libya.

I propose to take Question No. 6 and Priority Question No. 21 together. I have already set out the concerns of the Government about the US attack on Libya in reply to questions in this House on 15 April.

As I indicated on that occasion, the Government share the concerns of the United States about international terrorism. I also pointed out that we believe that terrorism can be defeated by political means. To this end, we have been engaged in the last few weeks in an intensive round of consultations with our European partners in the elaboration of an agreed European strategy to confront the challenge of international terrorism and to provide protection against terrorist attacks.

Throughout this crisis, I have urged the need for restraint on the part of all concerned and have emphasised the importance we in Ireland attach to the role of the United Nations and in particular the Security Council in facilitating the peaceful resolution of crises of this kind.

We received no advance notification of the US intention to launch an attack on Libya. Since the attack the US authorities have been in communication with my Department and they have informed us of the action they had taken and of the background to their decision. The US authorities, for their part, are fully aware of our concern about this crisis.

Within the framework of the common Twelve strategy for countering international terrorism, a number of measures have been agreed, including measures directed at Libya in the field of diplomatic and consular relations as well as stricter visa requirements and procedures. The Twelve will also examine the scope for reduction in the size of non-diplomatic Libyan offices in their countries and there will be greater concentration on the problem of abuses of diplomatic immunity.

On the basis of these decisions, several partners have already taken action to reduce the size of Libyan missions in their countries. As Deputies will be aware, Ireland maintains diplomatic relations with Libya on a non-resident basis.

In addition, the Twelve have decided not to export to Libya arms or other military equipment. They are agreed, moreover, that they will do everything in their power to ensure that their nationals and industry do not seek any commercial advantage from measures taken by others in response to terrorist attack. The Twelve have taken no decision on the imposition of trade sanctions as such against Libya. We and other partners have at all times made clear our opposition to such sanctions as inappropriate.

In the context of the present crisis, the Twelve have called for restraint and have taken steps to engage interested states, including the Arab states, in a dialogue about international terrorism and about effective methods of eradicating it. The Government strongly support this ongoing effort to elaborate a common European political response to the threat posed by international terrorism and to discourage support by any state for those who engage in terrorist attack. We believe that if there is an effective deterrent against state-supported terrorism, this will serve to diminish the dangers of military confrontation arising from such support.

Will the Minister accept that there was widespread disappointment at his failure to take a strong position on the bombing of Tripoli and Benghazi which resulted in many civilian deaths?

I do not accept that. I said I regretted very much the attack that took place and the deaths of civilians. I said I regretted also the terrorism that made the American Government feel it necessary to launch such an attack. I do not accept at all that there was widespread disappointment about what I said.

That concludes Question time.

Does that mean, Sir, that we have five minutes in hand?

No, we adjourn.

If that is the order of the House.

Is it appropriate for me to raise a matter on the Adjournment?

On a point of order, it does not mean we have five minutes in hand. The House adjourns now until 3.45 p.m. Is that not correct?

With your permission, a Cheann Comhairle, I should like to raise on the Adjournment the subject matter of Question No. 5 on the Order Paper of 8 April.

I will communicate with the Deputy. There is no provision for the House adjourning until 3.45 p.m. but, if the Minister so moves and the House agrees, then we will adjourn.

Then I so move, a Cheann Comhairle.

Is that agreed? Agreed.

Barr
Roinn