I propose to take Questions Nos. 13, 17, 39, 44, 157, 158 and 166 together.
The Government are convinced that the potential for water sports and sailing and tourism development based on such activity has been badly neglected. They are of the view that the amenity of Dún Laoghaire should be enhanced, facilities for sports people improved, and the opportunity for employment in the area increased.
On 23 June 1988, the Minister announced the establishment of a planning review group for Dún Laoghaire. The task of the group was to ensure that the long term as well as the short term options for the development of the harbour were properly examined and planned. The report of the group was presented to the Minister by the Chairman, Professor Dermot McAleese on Friday last, 25 November. EC Council activities prevented the Minister from examining the report in detail. However, from a preliminary reading, it appears to be an excellent report and Professor McAleese is to be commended for it.
I understand that about 70 submissions were made to the group. These covered all aspects of harbour usage, development, and management, and considered such issues as the future of the ferry terminal in Dún Laoghaire, leisure facilities, such as marinas and sailing and developments involving the Carlisle Pier and the infill of the area west of the West Pier. Many of the submissions contained ideas for developments in the harbour. A number were from organisations who might be prepared to invest in developments in the harbour area. I consider it desirable that the report be published and I intend to have this done as soon as possible.
The report contains a number of suggestions concerning the development of marina facilities in the harbour. I do not think that individual sections of the report should be read in isolation but that it should be studied in its entirety. I hope the report can be adopted as a blueprint for the future development of the harbour and I will have it examined in detail over the next few weeks, with this in mind.
As regards the time to complete the report, Professor McAleese felt that the subject could not easily be broken into two parts as requested by the terms of reference. I am sure that when the report is examined it will be obvious that the additional time was well spent.