Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Tuesday, 30 Jan 1990

Vol. 394 No. 8

Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - EC Presidency Expenditure.

Alan M. Dukes

Ceist:

3 Mr. Dukes asked the Taoiseach if he will outline the distribution of the projected expenditure of £0.5 million from Exchequer sources on the additional press and public relations operations to be carried out on behalf of the Irish EC Presidency in Brussels, Strasbourg and Dublin; the reason these functions are not being carried out through the normal Government and departmental spokespersons; and the process by which the persons and the firm engaged to carry out this selection were selected.

A provision of £500,000 is being made in the Vote for my Department in respect of exceptional expenditure arising from Ireland's Presidency of the European Community. The expenditure will include fees of £175,000 approximately for press and public relations personnel at press centres in Dublin, Brussels and Strasbourg and fees for an environmental adviser. The balance of the provision represents contingency provision for the additional meetings, receptions and travel necessary during the Presidency and for special projects in the arts and other areas which may be undertaken during the term of the Presidency in accordance with the practice now current in member states.

Having regard to the additional work of the Presidency and to the importance of providing adequate and comprehensive briefing to the large international media corps of some 1,500 who now cover Community affairs, the existing complement of Government and departmental information staff, whose function is the dissemination of information on normal Government activities, could not adequately deal with the additional matters related to the Presidency at this period of major developments within the Community and in the Community's relations with other countries.

The selection of the press and public relations consultants was on the basis of their professional expertise and experience.

Am I correct in understanding that this expenditure of £500,000, from what appears to be on the Minister for Finances's statement a fairly straightened budget, will be spent on a PR firm here in Dublin to deal with the press corps in Dublin who seem to me to be fairly good already at finding out what is going on——

Flattery will get the Deputy nowhere.

——and on the transfer of the new journalist to Brussels, a place which probably has more press and PR people in it per square mile than any other place in the world and the appointment to Brussels of a long time journalist — I gather he is now called an environmental adviser — who has been for a very long time a sycophantic fan of the Taoiseach, and whose job is apparently to tell MEPs what is going on in the Presidency, a group of people who have far better contacts already both in the Parliament, in the Council and in the Commission than any amateur journeyman journalist could possibly have? Is this journeyman journalist in Strasbourg the same person who recently reproduced a Commission document on the environment which bore no title on the outside but bore only a picture of the Taoiseach in very fetching sailing garb with binoculars around his neck and a coast of west Kerry background? Is that what the £500,000 is being spent on?

We should be slow to refer to persons outside the House even in a manner in which they might be identifiable.

(Interruptions.)

We do not wish to refer to anyone. It is a matter of mystery.

Question No. 4, please.

The Taoiseach has not replied to any one of those questions. Is it his intention to spend public money on hiring a press and PR firm in Dublin to improve his image? Is it his intention to spend public money on detaching a journalist from RTÉ to send him to Brussels to do a job that is already being done, including a job being done by the Council's press staff? I will give the Taoiseach a moment to read what the Tánaiste is showing him. Is it his intention to have somebody sent out to Strasbourg who knows less about the job than any MEP in the hope that he can improve his own image among MEPs?

I was trying to move on to the next question because I did not really think that the Deputy's questions, with all due deference, merited a reply.

(Interruptions.)

Please, Deputies.

Is the Taoiseach now saying that he is not prepared to account for the £500,000 to be spent on furnishing——

The Taoiseach is on his feet and it seems he wishes to reply.

I am giving a full account of the purposes for which these funds are provided. I would just like to say that when I was in Strasbourg at a special Summit meeting called by President Mitterand I became aware of the fact that there were 1,500 journalists there that evening from all over the world——

A Deputy

Looking for you?

——and I could not help noticing the enormous resources the French Presidency devoted to servicing the enormous corps of journalists.

He hankers after the imperial style.

We have——

(Interruptions.)

Let us hear the reply. Questions have been asked, let us hear the reply.

We propose some very modest additions to our normal Government Information Services——

Very modest indeed.

Please, Deputy.

——one centre in Dublin Castle where there are constant daily inquiries from the international press, one in the European Parliament and one in Brussels. These are very reasonable, sensible arrangements provided to enable us to attempt to service the enormous number of queries that arise during the Presidency from the international press corps.

A sum of £500,000 to do a job that is already being done.

I am calling Deputy Spring.

Deputy Dukes is being facetious about very important matters.

A sum of £500,000 needs to be accounted for.

Deputy Spring has been called.

In relation to the contracts of employment for the RTÉ journalist and the other journalists may I ask if these were exclusive contracts? Is there work for the six month period of the Presidency solely on the Presidency?

They are employed exclusively for the period of the Presidency and exclusively on Presidency operations.

Perhaps the Taoiseach would clarify how the same senior and ageing journalist is still writing for provincial papers on a weekly basis?

I am not aware of that but——

It is like the health crisis.

——in so far as our contract with any of these journalists is concerned it is exclusively for Presidential purposes.

I want to proceed to other questions. A brief question please, Deputy Barrett.

Would the Taoiseach not agree that we have in place here——

It is extraordinary that the parties who formed the Fine Gael-Labour Coalition Government would attempt to and have the audacity to raise in this House anything to do with the employment of journalists or public relations personnel——

(Interruptions.)

Deputy Barrett.

Would the Taoiseach not agree——

——particularly as it was they who brought the whole question of press agency and public relationship to a new height in this country when they were in office, not that it availed anything because they were dismissed——

(Interruptions.)

Deputy Barrett has been called.

Is it not the case——

I had called Deputy Barrett. The Chair will not be denied in this matter. A brief supplementary from Deputy Barrett, please.

Can the Taoiseach tell us if it is time that a number of agencies who worked for his Department at the time of the election are now being paid off through contracts either to Departments or to the EC Presidency?

That suggestion demeans the Deputy who makes it.

Question No. 4, please.

(Interruptions.)

Deputy Barrett, please desist.

Barr
Roinn