Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Tuesday, 3 Dec 1991

Vol. 413 No. 9

Adjournment Debate. - Dún Laoghaire Rates Support Grant.

I thank the Chair for allowing me to raise this matter on the Adjournment.

Cork Corporation have failed to adopt an Estimate and now face abolition. The editorial in The Irish Times today points out that the problem does not end there and that Limerick and Waterford are likely to follow suit. I wish to inform the Minister that Dún Laoghaire Borough Council are facing the same prospect. We began our statutory estimates meeting on Tuesday last on a draft estimate which provides for the retention of water charges — and Dún Laoghaire is the only part of the greater Dublin area which has such charges; the introduction of a sewage charge of £30 per household, and an increase in the commercial rate which is 3 times the rate of inflation. All the members of the council indicated that they would vote against this estimate.

This is consistent with a motion which the borough council passed last September, which declared an intention to abolish water charges in the borough and which sought a meeting with the Minister for the Environment, well in advance of estimates time, to discuss the financial situation of the corporation. The Minister's predecessor did not accede to that request and I am now asking the present Minister to agree to meet this week, or early next week, with a deputation from the borough council to discuss our financial problems, so that we can avoid a doomsday situation.

Dún Laoghaire's basic problem is the same as that of other local authorities. The rate support grant which they have received from the Department of the Environment is too low. It has failed to match the promise made when the domestic rates were abolished and taxes increased that local authorities would get from central Government the same moneys which they would have collected in rates.

Dún Laoghaire Corporation are now getting from the Department of the Environment only £1 out of every £4 to which they are entitled. This is leaving an annual shortfall of over £10 million. But, Dún Laoghaire has two other problems, first, the level of rates in Dún Laoghaire in 1977, the base year, was far below the rest of Dublin and the rate support grants were originally based on this suppressed rate. The second problem is the rate base. Only 27 per cent of valuations in Dún Laoghaire attract rates; this is only half the rate base of Dublin city. The net result is that Dún Laoghaire is not getting enough money from the Department of the Environment. The corporation do not have the money, even with service charges, to provide an adequate service to the public.

Moreover, Dún Laoghaire is the only part of the greater Dublin area which has water charges. Citizens of Dún Laoghaire borough cannot understand or accept why they must pay on the double for local services while their neighbours in Dublin city and county — often literally across the road, or down the street from them — do not.

Dún Laoghaire's borough councillors meet again on Tuesday evening to discuss the annual estimate. It does not appear that it will be possible for the council to adopt an estimate this year. This will put Dún Laoghaire in the same predicament as Cork, and possibly Limerick and Waterford.

The possible abolition of the councils has been mentioned by the Minister as an option, but it is an unrealistic and undemocratic option. Could the Minister seriously contemplate abolishing four of the largest local authorities in the country, only months after they were elected by the people — in many cases with a direct mandate to resist water and service charges? Where does the Minister think that would lead? How does he seriously expect large urban areas to be governed without elected representatives? Apart from the possible political consequences for the Government parties, the abolition of councils would lead to municipal anarchy — a situation which I, and I am sure every Member of this House, would not wish to contemplate.

I ask the Minister, therefore, to meet with the local authorities who are now in trouble, and specifically to meet with Dún Laoghaire Borough Council as we have requested. I ask him also to make available an increase in the rate support grant for these local authorities to enable them to adopt acceptable estimates of expenses.

Dún Laoghaire Corporation were notified of their rate support grant allocation for 1992 on 22 November last. The allocation is just over £3.8 million and this is the same as in 1991.

It was too little.

Dún Laoghaire Corporation have been treated in the same way as all other local authorities. The rate support grant replaces in part the income from rates formerly applicable to domestic dwellings and agricultural land and the former grant for rates and contribution in lieu of rates on Government property, commonly known as the "bounty in lieu of rates". This income varies from local authority to local authority because of differences in valuation levels and in rate poundages applied by councils over the years. These variations together with adjustments arising from other changes in local finances in recent years, including the elimination of certain levies and statutory demands and the writing off of capital loans from the local loans fund, are reflected in differences in rate support grant allocations for individual authorities. The direct payment of ESB rates to local authorities is also a factor in these adjustments. Because of all these adjustments, it is not possible to make direct comparisons of rate support grant allocations between various local authorities, but I assure the Deputy that the allocations for 1992 are the same across the board as for the current year.

My Department have commissioned a study on rate support grant. The London Institute of Fiscal Studies are examining the matter at present and their report is expected at the end of this year. When the report is received the Government will consider a new equalisation system for the way the grant is distributed.

The Deputy mentioned the difficult financial position facing Dún Laoghaire Corporation. I do not know of any local authority in the country that have not got difficulties of one sort or another.

What will you do about it.

Dún Laoghaire Corporation are now in the middle of considering their estimates for 1992. I know it is never an easy task but the decisions must be taken by the elected members of the corporation. I as Minister am not involved in this process. I am aware that some time ago the corporation requested a meeting with the Minister to seek additional funding of £1.2 million so that they could abolish domestic service charges. My Department replied that any decision to levy or not to levy service charges was a reserved function of the elected members when they were considering their estimates. More recently, the corporation sought a meeting again with the Minister to discuss the finances of the borough corporation. The Minister has declined that request just as he had to refuse to meet other local authorities on this particular matter, which in a special way, is the clear responsibility of the councillors themselves. Dún Laoghaire, like all the other local authorities, have been notified of their rate support grant allocation for 1992 and it is up to them now to make their own decisions. That is what they were elected for.

The decisions for 1992 for the services to be provided by Dún Laoghaire Corporation must be made by the elected members of that corporation. It is one of their fundamental responsibilities to adopt their estimate and to strike a rate for 1992. I sincerely hope they complete their obligations in this very important matter.

I should mention that 24 county councils, two county boroughs and 32 urban councils have adopted their spending estimates for 1992. I sincerely hope that Dún Laoghaire will be added to the list. I should point out that the Deputy's colleague, Deputy Brian Hillery, has also been in touch with me in connection with this matter. I also pointed out to him — and I want to point out to the Deputy — that it is solely a matter for the Dún Laoghaire Corporation elected members what they want to do. The same rates support grant applies to every corporation, county council and urban council.

That is a disgraceful reply.

Barr
Roinn