The Minister appeared to be answering a question I did not ask. I did not ask about repairs. It is clear the Minister has come in briefed on certain questions, and is giving those replies rather than replying to the question I asked. I repeat my question: will the Minister accept that people who paid rent over four years — due to a delay on the part of his Department, not theirs — should have that rent offset against the purchase price? Had there been no delay on the part of his Department those people would be four years nearer completion of repayment of their mortgages. Will the Minister accept, in natural justice, that any rent paid on account of a delay on the part of his Department should be offset against the purchase price?