Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Wednesday, 21 Oct 1992

Vol. 424 No. 1

Adjournment Debate. - Detention of Greenpeace Vessel.

Thank you for the opportunity to raise this matter in the House. I appreciate that the Minister for Foreign Affairs is absent on important business and I thank the Minister of State at the Department of the Taoiseach for coming to hear the few points I wish to raise in the context of this matter. I should also like to advise the House — and you, a Cheann Comhairle — that since I requested an opportunity to deal with this matter the m.v. Solo has been released from detention by the Russians at Murmansk and is now safely on its way to a port in Norway.

I should like to place on record my appreciation, as a constituency representative for the Irish citizen, Susan Foreman, who was on that boat, to the consular section of the Department of Foreign Affairs for the work they undertook in maintaining contact through diplomatic representatives at Murmansk with the ship and the people on board. I have no doubt that Greenpeace and Miss Foreman's family appreciate the work that was done. I am sure the same applies to Miss Foreman.

However, a number of matters remain outstanding and I ask the Minister of State to consult the Minister for Foreign Affairs on his return with a view to doing a number of very basic things. The ship was seized in international waters, it was not within the territorial waters of Russia when it was boarded by armed members of the naval service of Russia and detained. It was in an area they consider — and describe — as the economic area zone but that is a zone and area not recognised for the purposes of international law and they had no business seizing and boarding the craft in the circumstances. In addition, three shots were fired from a 30 millimetre gun at the stern of the boat as a warning, a threat or indeed an insult. They were then taken forcibly in tow and dragged through the waters to a naval base north of Murmansk where they were held incommunicado for almost one week. Only diplomatic representatives were allowed to enter the ship, a lawyer and representative of Greenpeace, who were in Murmansk, were not allowed to meet or consult the crew.

The radio control room of the ship was also sealed so that no contact could be made by the crew members with their own organisation, friends or relatives. Consequently, the rights of an Irish citizen were very seriously violated by the Russian naval authorities and I ask the Minister for Foreign Affairs to lodge the strongest possible protest with the Russian authorities in relation to this matter. In addition, it is important that Ireland should strongly state its support, through this action of protest, for Greenpeace, which is a friend of Ireland in a very meaningful way, Indeed, one of the other members and crew on board the ship was a Mr. John Large, an Englishman who works as an adviser — not only to Greenpeace — but to Dublin County Council, Dublin Corporation and Dún Laoghaire Corporation, in regard to our interest in pursuing matters in England relating to Sellafield and other nuclear programmes there. He was also detained in the way I have already described.

Greenpeace are a non-violent, active organisation working in our interest and in those of people around the world for a safe environment. They are acknowledged to be non-violent and are not armed. There was no need for the aggressive, hijacking attitude of the Russian authorities on this occasion. They were simply trying to investigate an area which is considered to be the single largest world-wide illegal dump of nuclear submarine reactors in the world. It has been in operation for over 30 years and has been used by the Russians contrary to all international agreements, including the provisions of the London Dumping Conference of which Ireland and Russia are members. Over the period of 30 years it has received over 15 reactors from dumped submarines and has had over 100 nuclear tests carried out there. For those reasons, it was responsible and reasonable for Greenpeace to be in the area to carry out their own independent tests of the contamination and abuse of the environment generally.

One of the crew members was an elected member of the Russian parliament and no one could complain in relation to what they were doing. They certainly did not deserve the treatment they got and I hope that Ireland will record its strong reservations — if not protests — about what has happened.

I am pleased to inform the House that the Dutch registered Greenpeace vessel m.v. Solo, was released today and has already left the Russian port of Murmansk. Miss Susan Foreman, the Irish citizen on board, is well and has been in touch with her family by ship's radio to convey the news.

The Irish Embassy in Moscow, which monitored Miss Foreman's welfare closely throughout the incident, was advised that the m.v. Solo was escorted out of Murmansk today at 16.00 hours, Russian time.

The vessel was arrested on 12 October as it was sailing off the No vaya Zem lya Archipelago where a former Soviet nuclear test site is situated.

The Russian authorities claimed that the ship had violated the state border of the Russian Federation and legislation on its territorial sea and economic zone. The Russian authorities said the coastal protection vessel in the area, which had repeatedly warned the m.v. Solo that it could not make explorations in Russian waters without prior permission of the competent Russian authorities firstly detained the vessel to allow it to carry out an on-board inspection. The inspection, according to Russian sources, revealed samples of water and soil and the decision was then taken to arrest the ship and escort it to Murmansk where a more detailed investigation could be carried out. The ship arrived in Murmansk last Saturday, where it was until today.

The Irish Embassy in Moscow immediately sought an explanation from the Russian Foreign Ministry as to the reasons for the ship's arrest and was informed that the Solo had been arrested on three grounds: the vessel had violated Russia's borders; in entering the relevant sea area, without the prior authorisation of the Russian authorities, it had violated the regulations governing scientific research; the Solo had sailed on the northern sea route without preliminary notification. The Embassy requested information on the welfare of Ms. Foreman and were assured that they would be kept informed by the Foreign Ministry.

Within the framework of EC consular co-operation, the Irish Embassy requested a Dutch consular official — as representative of the flag State — who visited the Solo in Murmansk to represent the consular interests of Ms. Foreman. After visiting the vessel, the Dutch representative reported to the Irish Embassy that all members of the crew, including Ms. Foreman, were safe and well.

The Department were also in regular contact with Ms. Foreman's family and with the Greenpeace office in Dublin throughout the past week. These contacts allowed the Department to be satisfied as to her safety and welfare.

Deputy McCartan has raised the question of the making of a protest to the Russian authorities. As I have indicated, the Irish Embassy in Moscow sought an explanation from the Russian Foreign Ministry and the question of a further approach would need to be considered in the light of knowledge of the full circumstances and an examination of international law in the matter.

Without entering into the detail of the possible legal issues involved, the ships of all States are entitled under international law to exercise the right of innocent passage through the territorial sea. Such passage must be continuous and expeditious and stopping and anchoring are acceptable only in exceptional circumstances, for example, to render assistance to persons in distress. In addition, it is generally accepted that certain activities are incompatible with innocent passage. These include the carrying out of research or survey activities. Exploration or investigation in a country's territorial sea and economic zone may not be undertaken without the consent of the coastal State.

Barr
Roinn