Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Tuesday, 28 Jun 1994

Vol. 444 No. 5

Written Answers. - Disabled Drivers Scheme.

Pádraic McCormack

Ceist:

32 Mr. McCormack asked the Minister for Finance the reason there is an anomaly regarding the concession for disabled car drivers and disabled car passengers who are physically disabled whereby a passenger has to spend 20 per cent of the base price on alterations to a vehicle to qualify for rebate of tax, in view of the fact that alteration may sometimes not be necessary and that this is not a requirement for a physically disabled driver; and if he will make a statement on the matter.

The current disabled drivers scheme, established under and governed by the Disabled Drivers (Tax Concessions) Regulations, 1989, provides significant tax concessions to qualifying disabled drivers and passengers with severe mobility problems. The reliefs available under the scheme include repayment of VAT and Vehicle Registration Tax on the acquisition of a new vehicle, excise duty refunds on up to 600 gallons of petrol or diesel annually and exemption from road tax.

While all vehicles must be specially constructed or adapted under the scheme, in the case of qualifying disabled passengers, the regulations require that the VAT-free cost of the vehicle adaptations must amount to at least 20 per cent of the pre-tax cost of the vehicle. This requirement stems from the fact that, generally speaking, where qualifying passengers are concerned, the nature of any adaptation which would be required to the vehicle would be quite different from those required by qualifying drivers. It must also be borne in mind that the vehicles involved are not likely to be used exclusively, or at all times, for the transport of the disabled passenger but will also be used by others e.g. family members.

Against that background, the adaptation requirement is a fundamental control mechanism of the scheme which is designed to ensure that, within scarce budgetary resources, those most in need of help benefit. The matter of,inter alia, the adaptation requirement was considered in the course of the recent review of the disabled drivers scheme; the review recommendation is that no change should be made in this regard. In order to protect the wider interest, I must reiterate that complete abolition of a minimum adaption requirement, however desirable it may seem and even in limited circumstances, could open the scheme to abuse. Further more, it could, in the long term, be excessively costly to the Exchequer. I have no plans, therefore, at this time to change the law in this regard.
Barr
Roinn