Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Thursday, 7 Dec 1995

Vol. 459 No. 5

Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Dayton Agreement.

Ray Burke

Ceist:

2 Mr. R. Burke asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs, in view of the Dayton Agreement's commitment to preserving Bosnia-Hercegovina as a single state, a principle which Ireland supports, while simultaneously providing for the establishment of two separate political entities within that state, the steps, if any, he will take through the available channels to assist in ensuring that the degree of autonomy conceded to these entities will not render the commitment to a united Bosnia meaningless. [18326/95]

Chris Flood

Ceist:

20 Mr. Flood asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs the steps, if any, he will take through the available channels to assist in ensuring that the commitment contained in the Dayton Agreement, that the Bosnian refugees be allowed to return to their former homes, will become more than just an aspiration, particularly in view of the fact that it relates to those areas which have been allocated to the Bosnian Serbs and from where the great majority of refugees have come. [18313/95]

Colm M. Hilliard

Ceist:

24 Mr. Hilliard asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs, in view of his statement of 23 May 1995, that the most flagrant violations of human rights have been carried out in Kosovo by the Serbian authorities and the fact that this and related issues of human rights violations in the Sandjak and other parts of Serbia were not addressed in the Dayton Agreement and, by contrast, international sanctions against Serbia are being lifted, the steps, if any, he will take through the available channels to deal with this issue, particularly since he has also stated that there cannot be a comprehensive solution for former Yugoslavia without a solution for Kosovo. [18320/95]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 2, 20 and 24 together.

The agreement concluded at Dayton, Ohio, by the Presidents of Bosnia-Hercegovina, Croatia and Serbia on 21 November constitutes a framework for lasting peace and stability in a country which has been ravaged by war for almost four years. It is to be signed formally at a peace conference in Paris on 14 December.

I warmly welcome this agreement. If the fragile peace in Bosnia-Hercegovina is to be consolidated, the Dayton Agreement must be fully implemented. It is essential that there should be a well co-ordinated international effort to assist the peoples of the region in the difficult tasks of democracy-building, reconciliation and reconstruction which lie ahead.

The Dayton Agreement is lengthy and complex. Some of its more important elements are: the maintenance of Bosnia-Hercegovina as a single multi-ethnic state within its internationally recognised borders; an over-arching central presidency with representatives from each of the three ethnic groups, a council of ministers and a central parliament; underneath the central structures there will be two entities, the Federation and the Republika Srpska; elections will be held next year for the central presidency and parliament, and for the institutions of both of Bosnia's entities — the OSCE has been given the task of supervising these elections; special arrangements have been agreed to encourage refugees and displaced persons to return voluntarily and in safety to their homes; and the Security Council has been invited to authorise the deployment of an international force to supervise the withdrawal of armies to the agreed zones.

The parties agreed at Dayton that the central structure of the state will retain responsibility for foreign policy, foreign trade, monetary and customs policy, immigration and asylum matters, international and inter-entity law enforcement, air traffic control and inter-entity transportation. It is clear, therefore, that the central institution of Bosnia-Hercegovina will have real powers and responsibilities.

On 4 December, the European Foreign Ministers reconfirmed their commitment to make a substantial contribution to the implementation of the Dayton Agreement. To this end, the union will work to support the federation and to strengthen the central structures of Bosnia-Hercegovina by promoting constructive Bosnian Serb participation in these structures.

Implementation of the Dayton Agreement will have both military and civil dimensions. Regarding the former, the Security Council is expected to authorise the deployment of a multinational force when the peace agreement has been signed and to withdraw UNPROFOR. To maximise the effectiveness of the international community's support for the implementation of the civil aspects of the agreement, new and more effective co-ordinating structures will need to be created. Tomorrow, I will be in London to attend the peace implementation conference which will begin to give shape to these. I expect that there will be agreement on the role and functions of a high representative who will be entrusted by the Security Council with a pivotal role in co-ordinating civilian implementation.

The holding of free and fair elections is, in many ways, the keystone for the development of a democratic society and is therefore crucial to the prospects for the overall success of the agreement. The OSCE has been given the task by the parties to the Dayton Agreement with the responsibility for supervising these elections. These could be held next year during Ireland's Presidency. We will at that time have the leading role in the European Community Monitor Mission which will provide the OSCE with valuable support in preparing for and supervising the elections.

I very much welcome the agreement of the Bosnian parties to secure for all persons in their jurisdiction the highest level of internationally recognised human rights and fundamental freedoms. The European Union will do its utmost to ensure that this commitment is honoured. It is being made clear to the parties that support for reconstruction and the development of longer-term relations between the states in the region will be subject to respect for human and minority rights and for the right of all refugees and displaced persons to return to their homes.

I attach the highest importance to the work which is to be undertaken by the UNHCR in support of an early and orderly return of refugees. The UNHCR has been entrusted by the UN Secretary General with the role of co-ordinating the repatriation and relief of refugees and displaced persons. The Government will continue to liaise closely with the UNHCR and to assist that agency in its work in this area.

At Dayton the parties agreed on the establishment of an independent Commission for Refugees and Displaced Persons which will include representatives appointed by the European Court of Human Rights. This body will work closely with the UNHCR to ensure that the parties co-operate fully in facilitating the return of refugees and displaced persons. The new structures which will be established to monitor and co-ordinate the implementation of the Dayton Agreement, and in which the European Union will be represented, will have a role in ensuring that the parties honour the commitments which they have made in this area.

I am under no illusions as to the enormity of the task which the implementation of the Dayton Agreement involves. In this regard, I should emphasise that the primary responsibility rests with the parties themselves who must honour their commitments. If there is goodwill and a genuine effort by all to implement the agreement, the international community will be able to provide substantial support for their endeavours and advance reconciliation. The Dayton Agreement is clearly an essential step towards a comprehensive solution to the problems of the region. That is why the Security Council has recently suspended the economic sanctions against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia which had been imposed on account of that state's support for the war aims of the Bosnian Serbs. However, there are a number of important issues such as human rights violations in Kosovo and elsewhere in Serbia which are not addressed in the Dayton Agreement on Bosnia-Hercegovina.

I consider that the violations of the most fundamental human rights in Kosovo are entirely unacceptable. Belgrade's policies in this regard also run the risk of destabilising the southern Balkan region by precipitating a Serbo-Albanian conflict. Ireland, with its European Union partners, will continue to make it clear to Belgrade that human and minority rights must be respected throughout the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, and that a large degree of autonomy must be restored to Kosovo. We are also insisting that Belgrade must permit the immediate redeployment of the long-term missions of the Organisation for Security Co-operation in Europe — (OSCE) — to monitor the human rights in Kosovo, Sandjak and Vojvodina.

Belgrade is well aware of the priority the European Union attaches to the immediate and full respect of human rights in Kosovo, as well as the rights of the minorites in Sandjak and Vojvodina. The EU Council of Ministers on 30 October made clear that a solution to these issues is essential for the full integration of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia into the international community and for the stabilisation of the region as a whole.

I hope the Agreement in Dayton will encourage Belgrade to end human rights violations in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and to restore Kosovo's autonomy. Ireland, with our European Union partners, will continue our efforts to achieve these vital goals.

We on this side of the House warmly welcome the Dayton Agreement. It must have been an immense relief not only to the people of former Yugoslavia but to the whole of Europe who have been shamed by what has happened in that area. Does the Tánaiste consider a unitary state conceivable in Bosnia-Hercegovina after four years of war? Would he agree that peace and democracy are absolutely essential if the conditions of the Dayton Agreement are to be built on? Would he agree that the balance of peace there is very fragile and must be consolidated through building democratic structures?

While refugees have the right to return to their homes under the Dayton Agreement, would the Tánaiste agree that conditions on the ground may not permit that? What role does the Tánaiste envisage for the European Union in ensuring the capability as well as the right of those refugees to return to their homes?

I thank the Deputy for welcoming the Dayton Agreement. I am sure he echoes the views of all parties in this House and the public generally. Indeed, great credit is due to the United States and the European Union for their input into those, by all accounts, difficult negotiations. It is a fragile agreement. Another three conferences will take place in the next three weeks to secure various aspects of it, including one beginning in London tomorrow. The European Union will continue to play a leading role with the assistance of the United States. The object of the agreement is to enable Bosnia to continue as a single State, with its sovereignty fully respected by its neighbours. I consider this an enormous achievement bearing in mind the efforts of many to dismember Bosnia in recent years. The State will be comprised of two entities — the Federation of Bosnia-Hercegovina and the Republika Srpska. There will be a Constitution for Bosnia, creating effective central institutions, including a Presidency, Parliament and a constituent court. Enormous tasks lie ahead for the goverance of Bosnia-Hercegovina which cannot be done successfully without the co-operation of the parties on the ground and the enormous support of the rest of the world. It will impose an enormous requirement on the European Union, the United States and third countries outside of those comprising the European Union and the United States. Negotiations will take place with other countries on the contributions to be made in relation to the task ahead of us and, on the military and civilian sides, will require enormous efforts by the rest of the world. However, the Dayton Agreement provides an opportunity, as Deputy Ray Burke acknowledged. Everything must be done to ensure there is no reversion to the four-year war in that region.

The Tánaiste mentioned in his initial response that the UNPROFOR forces were to be withdrawn. Does he envisage participation of members of the Garda Síochána or Army in support of the Dayton Agreement — obviously not within the context of NATO — if requested? This side of the House would support any such request.

In regard to the latter part of the Deputy's first question, the intention is that refugees will be enabled to return home. The capacity for them to be absorbed will increase with the reconstruction and development that will take place in which we will assist.

We have not been approached about possible participation by the Irish Army or police in the implementation force nor has the United Nations Security Council adopted a resolution, as yet, and will not do so until after the conference. If approached, we will examine any such request very carefully. We shall have to examine many issues, for example, whether we could participate under the provisions of current legislation which would have to be discussed in this House, but much will depend on the terms of the enabling United Nations Security Council resolution, the contents of which we must await.

In general, we will have to contribute personnel to the European Union monitoring mission during our Presidency, a substantial contribution of approximately 70-80 Defence Forces personnel. We shall examine any request which I shall be happy to discuss with any spokespersons on Foreign Affairs of any of the other parties in the House. As has been well recorded, we have a very proud record of contribution to United Nations peacekeeping missions.

I would welcome our participation within the context of a mandate from the United Nations Security Council or European Union — but not of NATO.

Would the Tánaiste agree that until there is peace among the Albanian population of Kosovo and the Serbian administration problem there is resolved, there cannot be lasting peace in the former Yugoslavia or in the Balkan area generally?

I agree that the matter of peace and respect for human rights of the Albanian population of Kosovo are fundamental to the long-term peace and security of that region. Unfortunately, we are aware that human rights violations continue in Kosovo, that the situation on the ground is very tense, with the possible danger of the radicalisation of Kosovo's ethnic Albanian population, which information has been made available by the working group of the International Conference on former Yugoslavia, of which the European Union is well seized. While the obvious solution is virtual autonomy for Kosovo — enjoyed by its people over many years — the situation is tense and, as the Deputy rightly said, until peace and respect for human rights in Kosovo is established, we shall not have the peace in that region to which we all aspire.

Barr
Roinn