Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Tuesday, 15 Apr 1997

Vol. 477 No. 5

Adjournment Debate. - English Prison Escapee.

Everybody will be appalled that a triple killer who has been on the run from Broadmoor high security hospital for more than 16 years has been participating in a FÁS scheme in the native city of the Minister of State at Cork women's poetry circle. It is quite incredible that Alan Patrick Reeve, responsible for the killing of three individuals, has been living here for the past two years without any serious attempt being made to restrict his movements or to protect others from him. It is not as if our authorities were not aware of the existence of Mr. Reeve here. Indeed reports suggest that as far back as August 1995 Thames Valley police in the United Kingdom were made aware by the Garda that Mr. Reeve was living in Cork. How is it possible that a convicted killer can be permitted to remain at large here with the authorities oblivious to the potential risk to ordinary, law-abiding citizens? Such disregard for the life and limb of each and every citizen, amounting to negligence, is nothing new on the part of this rainbow coalition Government. We are all only too well acquainted with the litany of gaffes which has become the forte of this Administration, more particularly of the Minister for Justice. Rarely has a day passed in the preceding two years that we have not learned of another episode of bungling by the Minister, another escaped prisoner, another incomplete extradition warrant or, dare I say, another unopened envelope.

Tough words from the Tánaiste recently will not protect the men, women and children of Cork or elsewhere from people who remain at large long after they should have been removed from our streets. Such a person is Mr. Reeve who was convicted of three manslaughters.

Most people will be incredulous that not only was this man able to roam freely around Cork and presumably elsewhere — for that matter perhaps in and out of the country — but he was actually given employment by a State agency, FÁS. This is an extraordinary indictment of the vetting procedures for employing individuals. The very least people participating in State schemes, recruited for State or any other employment can expect is that their lives and limbs be safeguarded. In this instance it would appear those participating in the FÁS scheme in Cork were in direct contact with an individual who was, and in all probability is, extremely dangerous.

For this and many other reasons extremely serious questions must be answered. While I do not say so facetiously, I can only hope the extradition of Alan Patrick Reeve from this State does not suffer the same fate as the fatal, debauched and chaotic shambles that characterised the Duncan extradition case handled by another Administration here.

I shall ignore the electioneering phraseology of Deputy O'Donoghue and deal with the facts.

The Garda authorities indicated that in August 1995, on becoming aware of this man's presence in this jurisdiction, they informed the police in Britain of that fact. Deputies will appreciate that, pending receipt of warrants for the purpose of the person's extradition to Britain, the Garda had no basis on which to proceed against him. Two warrants in respect of the person concerned were received by the Garda Síochána from the Thames Valley police force on 20 February 1997 indicating that the person concerned was absent without leave from a mental hospital where he had been detained following his conviction on two incidents of manslaughter and was liable to be retaken under the United Kingdom Mental Health Act, 1983.

The Garda Síochána sent these warrants to the Attorney General's Office on 20 February 1997 for examination in the normal way. On 5 March 1997 the Attorney General's Office informed the Garda that the warrants were in order for endorsement. On 12 March 1997 the Garda, in accordance with the law, inquired whether the Minister for Justice wished to intervene in the case. On 14 March 1997 the Minister, having examined the warrants, indicated that she did not propose to intervene.

The Garda authorities indicated that the person concerned was arrested on foot of the two warrants on 3 April 1997 and brought before the courts on that day. He was remanded in custody to 9 April on which date he was further remanded to 14 April 1997.

Members of the House will be aware that neither the Garda Síochána nor the courts have the power to detain any person without proper cause. The Garda Síochána must have a legal basis to proceed against any person and, prior to the receipt of the warrants in this case, had no basis to commence any proceedings in this jurisdiction against the person concerned. The Minister for Justice has been informed by the Garda Síochána that the person involved is neither wanted nor charged in connection with any offence committed in this jurisdiction.

I am glad to have had this opportunity, on behalf of the Minister for Justice, to provide clarification on the basis of the information provided by the Garda authorities about what happened in this case. The House will appreciate that, as the case is at present before the courts, it would not be appropriate for me to comment in any greater detail.

Barr
Roinn