Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Tuesday, 24 Feb 1998

Vol. 487 No. 6

Priority Questions. - Airport Charges.

Emmet Stagg

Ceist:

25 Mr. Stagg asked the Minister for Public Enterprise the value in monetary terms to Ryanair of the reductions and rebates of ground handling charges by Aer Rianta for its services provided to Ryanair at Dublin, Cork and Shannon airports in the period from 1989 to 1994 inclusive; if this State aid provided through the State owned company Aer Rianta was reported by the Minister to the EU Commission; if so, on what date; and the response, if any, which was received from the Commission. [4939/98]

I will set out the factual position and then outline the policy context surrounding these issues. The rebates of Aer Rianta airport charges from 1989 to 1994 were not regarded as State aids and, accordingly, were not reported to the European Commission.

As far as other forms of assistance to Ryanair are concerned, from inquiries my Department has made in the Departments of Tourism, Sport and Recreation and Enterprise, Trade and Employment, I understand that Ryanair up to the end of 1994 received tourism marketing grants totalling £1,062,000 under the Operational Programmes for Tourism 1989-93 and 1994-9. These were ERD funds from programmes which were generally available for tourism promotion purposes. Therefore, they did not constitute State aid.

I also understand that FÁS provided £45,600 to Ryanair in the years 1991-3 under the FÁS training support scheme and a further £120,900 in 1993 and 1994 under the FÁS job training scheme. Such moneys are generally available from FÁS to industry for training support. I also understand it was announced in late 1996 that Ryanair in the form of its subsidiary Ryanair Direct will receive assistance of £2.2 million over the years 1997-9 from Forbairt for the establishment of a new teleservice/tele-marketing business in Dublin. This type of support to industry is widely available and I understand it generally comes under an exemption agreed with the European Commission from the State aid rules. In line with this exemption the assistance to Ryanair Direct was not required to be reported to the Commission.

Regarding the allocation of routes to Ryanair and Aer Lingus in 1989, the position is as follows. The then Minister for Tourism and Transport announced in September 1989 a Government policy for aviation. The Minister granted exclusive rights to Ryanair in 1989 on routes from Dublin to Luton, Stansted, Liverpool and Munich. At the same time it was decided to grant Aer Lingus sole rights on the routes from Ireland to Heathrow and Gatwick and from Dublin to Manchester and Paris. The decision applied for a period of three years up to the end of 1992.

With regard to the Aer Rianta rebate schemes, these have been an important element in the company's efforts to grow traffic through the three State airports. The schemes contribute towards keeping access transport costs into and out of Ireland to a minimum and have helped to underpin tourism employment and employment growth generally. The success of the schemes to date can be seen from the unprecedented traffic levels and the highest ever passenger numbers.

With regard to the two airline policies introduced for three years in 1989, these arrangements were designed to focus aviation policy on a strengthening of the Irish presence on routes to and from Ireland rather than having two Irish air carriers, namely Ryanair and Aer Lingus, actively pursuing traffic on identical routes. European Union aviation policy has since moved on to the position where all airlines are free to compete on all routes without restriction on capacity or fares.

On the value of discounts availed of by Ryanair at Cork, Dublin and Shannon between 1989 and 1994, the figures are as follows: 1989, £500,000; 1990, £0.86 million; 1991, £1.2 million; 1992, £1.99 million; 1993, £1.92 million and 1994, £2.08 million.

I thank the Minister for her reply but I am not satisfied that the very large assistance given to Ryanair constitutes State aid. The Minister put a large monetary value on the assistance taken out of the taxpayers' pocket and put into the rich man's pocket — these moneys will go directly to the chief executive and directors, who also benefit from the low wages paid to employees. Will the Minister give this information to the Commission and ask it to make a determination on whether this assistance is State aid? These schemes were designed not to create competition but rather to prevent it and give an advantage to one company. It is extraordinary that the Minister who made this decision was the owner of the company disadvantaged by it. I am referring to the Government Chief Whip, Deputy Seamus Brennan, who made the order excluding Aer Lingus——

A question, please, Deputy.

The order made by the then Minister in 1989 excluded Aer Lingus from the development of certain routes and gave Ryanair exclusive rights to these and other routes. The Minister has not put a value on the cost to Aer Lingus——

The Deputy must ask a question. If we do not reach the third priority within 20 minutes it cannot be dealt with.

Will the Minister inform the Commission of the payments made to Ryanair under the various headings referred to in my question to see if they are covered by the term "State aid"? Will she put a value on the cost to Aer Lingus of developing the routes which were handed over to Ryanair?

I gave the Deputy all the figures requested. I obtained them from the various Departments which have given grant aid in one form or another to the company. I will ask my Department to raise the matter with the Commission. Assistance is available to any company from Forbairt and FÁS under various headings.

The decision made by the then Minister in 1989 was a definite policy one from which consumers have benefited. I do not have figures with me but the travelling costs on some routes have decreased in recent years. The various arrangements operated by successive Governments, trade unions and employers over many years brought about a change in the economic climate. This consensus, in turn, fuelled a huge interest in the aviation industry and benefited those who run airlines. It is a pity this consensus is now being ignored by a firm which gained from it.

Will the Minister agree that the consumer benefited from competition in the provision of services by airlines and not from the restrictive practice of banning Aer Lingus from developing certain routes? Ryanair was the main beneficiary of this and its directors and chief executive were made very rich through the transfer of money from the taxpayers' pocket to their pocket. Will the Minister bring to an end the system of rebates for landing charges, specifically for Ryanair? These rebates are paid out of the taxpayers' pocket to a company owned by them. These rebates should be ended until such time as the company agrees to pursue normal industrial relations, particularly with reference to the baggage handlers. Is the Minister aware of the serious and widespread threat to the social partnership and the agreements which have brought about a growth in the economy from this maverick company which is practising capitalism which dates from the last century?

I agree that the current situation poses a real threat to continued partnership between all the relevant concerns. The removal of the arrangements governing rebates is a matter for Aer Rianta. However, I will discuss the matter with the chairman of the company.

Barr
Roinn