I wish to concentrate on the two aspects of the Dublin Transportation Office recommendation which give me most cause for concern. I thank the Minister of State, Deputy Jacob, for coming to the House but I regret that neither the Minister for the Environment and Local Government nor the Minister for Public Enterprise saw fit to attend.
This is an emergency short-term action plan. It is not the solution to congestion but merely an attempt to identify what is necessary to hold the chaos at bay until the year 2000. It is an attempt to prevent Dublin traffic congestion from crossing the line from mere chaos to total breakdown.
Last April the Minister for Public Enterprise told me in this House that she expected to have that plan on her desk by the end of the month. It did not arrive by the end of the month, although it had been drafted by the Dublin Transportation Office, because the transportation office and the agencies which comprise it could not agree on either its content or its presentation.
When the plan finally arrived on the Government's desk towards the end of July it languished there throughout the summer. It finally saw the light of day last Tuesday, the day before the Dáil resumed and when I had tabled a parliamentary question on the Government's response to it. Would the plan still be lying on a Government desk if I had not tabled that question?
The handling of this emergency plan gives a whole new meaning to our understanding of the word "emergency". It highlights yet again the complete inadequacy of the structures we have in place to deliver a quality public transport service in Dublin. We have a multiplicity of agencies, all with their own priorities and all reporting to a variety of Ministers, with no single person with political responsibility for the delivery of a decent transport service.
This is evidenced, if evidence were needed, in my constituency every morning. The Knocklyon and Rathfarnham areas are now famous because they feature every morning on AA Roadwatch. Traffic chaos reigns and has become a way of life. It is a genuine crisis which requires a co-ordinated and urgent response. Instead, we have paralysis of the traffic and paralysis of the of the agencies which might be in a position to respond.
When the mere preparation of the plan overran by six months, what confidence can we have that its actual implementation will do any better, particularly given the time scale envisaged if the plan is to be effective and chaos avoided? The year 2000 seems a very tight time scale when we have already wasted six months.
I am sure the Minister of State, Deputy Jacob, will read me the list of measures in the plan for which funding is available. I agree that much of the plan is being funded, which I welcome despite my realisation that the funding came only as a result of the reallocation of funding due to the complete mess made of the Luas project.
However, I want the Minister of State to address the fundamental recommendation of the Dublin Transportation Office that operational funding should be provided for public transport on an ongoing annual basis. This is the measure on which the success of the entire plan depends — every element of the plan depends on the provision of ongoing operational subvention.
Dublin Bus requires additional buses but if the Minister of State were to tell me tonight that Dublin Bus could buy another 200 buses in the morning, I could tell him that those buses would lie idle in Dublin Bus garages — as they have before — unless Dublin Bus was given a subvention to make its operation viable. Unless the Government accepts the fundamental principle——