The person named applied for 1995 suckler cow premium on six cows. He had a suckler quota of three premium rights and was, therefore, paid suckler cow premium on three cows. He also applied for, and was paid on, eight special beef animals, each over 24 months, under the 1995 special beef premium scheme. He declared an area of 18.79 hectares on his 1995 area aid application.
In accordance with the regulations, extensification premium is payable on all animals paid under the suckler cow and special beef premium schemes if the stocking density on the holding is less than 1.4 Lu/Ha. The person named had a total of 11 Lus, three suckler cow Lus and eight special beef Lus, for 1995. The stocking density was, therefore, 0.58 Lu/Ha, 11 Lus divided by 18.79 hectares. This entitled the person named to extensification premium on 11 animals amounting to £322.19. However, the person named was overpaid under the 1995 headage scheme and the amount of £322.19 was offset against this overpayment.
The person named applied for 1996 suckler cow premium on seven cows. He had a suckler cow quota for six premium rights and was, therefore, paid suckler cow premium on six cows. He also applied for and was paid on 13 animals under the 22 month special beef premium schemes. Twelve of those animals were over two years and were equivalent to 1 Lu each and one animal was under two years and was therefore equivalent to 0.6 Lu. The total livestock units for 1996 were 18.6.
He had an area of 12.26 hectares for 1996. The stocking density was, therefore, 1.51 Lu/Ha, 18.6 divided by 12.26, for 1996. As the stocking density was not less than 1.4 Lu/Ha the person named has no entitlement to extensification premium in 1996.
The person named applied for, and was paid on, six suckler cows under the 1997 suckler cow premium scheme. He also applied for, and was paid on, three animals under the ten month special beef premium scheme and six animals under the 22 month special beef premium scheme each equivalent to 0.6 Lu. He made a further application for 16 animals equivalent to 10.8 Lus under the 22 month premium scheme. Of these, four were rejected but counted for stocking density – two were females and two were previously paid on. He was paid at a reduced rate on the remaining 12 animals. The total livestock units for 1997 were 22.2. He had an area of 12.72 hectares for 1997. The stocking density was, therefore, 1.74 Lu/Ha, 22.2 divided by 12.72, for 1997. As the stocking density was not less than 1.4 Lu/Ha the person named has no entitlement to extensification premium for 1997.