Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Wednesday, 29 Sep 1999

Vol. 508 No. 1

Written Answers. - Poultry Industry.

John Gormley

Ceist:

267 Mr. Gormley asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food if, further to Parliamentary Question No. 243 of 25 February 1999, his attention has been drawn to the fact that, following Switzerland's ban of battery cages for laying hens in 1992, the sale of home produced eggs increased from 62 per cent in 1981 to 72 per cent in 1997; his view on whether a phase out of battery cages in the EU will not necessarily lead to a mass importation of cheap battery produced eggs; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [17217/99]

Ireland's stance has always been to be supportive of enhanced welfare for laying hens whilst at the same time seeking to ensure a correct balance between welfare and the need to protect the interests of the Irish and EU producer. I am therefore fully supportive of new EU rules in the form of Council Directive 1999/74/EC which prohibits conventional battery cages from the year 2012 and the following associated declaration adopted when the directive was introduced: "The Council and the Commission, stressing the need to ensure equal conditions of competition between European Union and third-country producers, considered that international acknowledgement of animal welfare rules must be one of the key points of the negotiating brief for the WTO Millennium Round."

It is premature to speculate as to whether the phase-out of conventional battery cages within the EU will lead to mass importations from third countries. Recent data for Switzerland would indicate a downward trend in imports and an increase in the production of eggs in shell in that country. I would draw attention to Council Directive 98/58/EC on the protection of animals kept for farming purposes, which requires the EU Commission to submit a report to Council on the following: the comparison between animal welfare provisions in the Community and in non-member countries which supply the Community, the scope for obtaining wider international acceptance of the welfare principles laid down in this directive, and the extent to which Community objectives in relation to animal welfare may be liable to be undermined as a result of competition from non-member countries which do not apply equivalent standards.

I look forward with interest to receiving the Commission's proposals in the near future.
Barr
Roinn