As stated in my reply of 9 November 1999 to Parliamentary Question No. 155, the 1999 area aid application for the person named was randomly selected for inspection. The applicant applied for a total of 24.25 hectares. A dispute over the right to claim parcel P16724023, one hectare, was resolved in favour of the person named and he has been given the credit for it. However, a number of other parcels were found to be overclaimed, which has lead to a total overclaim in this application of 9.46h. The area determined at inspection was 14.79 hectares. This represents a difference of 9.46 hectares or 63.96 per cent.
Under Article 9 of EU Regulation 3887/92, no penalty is applied when the difference is less than 3 per cent, the penalty is based on double the difference when it is between 3 per cent and 20 per cent and when the difference is over 20 per cent, a 100 per cent penalty must be applied. Therefore in this case a full 100 per cent penalty must be applied and no area aid related payments can be made.
The applicant signed the inspection at the time, certifying that the inspection procedure was explained to him and that he was satisfied it was carried out correctly.