Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Wednesday, 10 May 2000

Vol. 518 No. 6

Written Answers. - Legislative Programme.

Pat Rabbitte

Ceist:

315 Mr. Rabbitte asked the Minister for Health and Children if he will expedite the proposals he has for amendments under section 59 of the Health Act, 1970 in order to facilitate the dropping of the derogation provided for in Article 1 of Council Directive 85/432/EEC as has been availed of in Ireland; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [12594/00]

Section 59 of the Health Act, 1970 provides for the supply of drugs, medicines and medical and surgical appliances under the general medical services scheme and the community drugs schemes. I have brought forward proposals to amend section 59 of the Health Act, 1970, in the recently published Health (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill, 2000. My purpose in amending section 59 of the Health Act, 1970, is to improve and update the statutory basis for the regulation of the schemes, to promote an equitable and more accountable service and to better provide for the delivery of community pharmacy services.

I should explain that Council Directives 85/432/EEC, 85/433/EEC and 85/584/EEC deal with the mutual recognition of qualifications in pharmacy. Attempts were made by the European Commission on several occasions to introduce measures which would facilitate the free movement of pharmacists. However, restrictions in most member states on the freedom of pharmacists to open new pharmacies became a major stumbling block to the adoption of any Council directives which would provide for the free movement of pharmacists. Member states that had restrictions on the opening of new pharmacies were unwilling to remove them and other member states, including Ireland, were unwilling to support a measure which would impact unfairly on their own graduates. For example, while Irish graduates were restricted from opening pharmacies elsewhere, their peers from other member states were not restricted from opening pharmacies in Ireland and in other countries with no con trols. Eventually, a compromise proposal was worked out which provided for a derogation incorporated in Article 2.2 of Council Directive 85/433/EEC which was a derogation from the obligation to recognise EC qualifications in respect of "new pharmacies," in this case pharmacies which have been in operation for less than three years. Regulations were then made in this country to give statutory effect to the directives.
Issues arising from unrestricted pharmacy openings were later addressed in Ireland by the introduction of the Health (Community Pharmacy Contractor Agreement) Regulations, 1996. However, these regulations quickly became the subject of a judicial review and it was decided to defer any change to the regulations dealing with the mutual recognition of qualifications until all legal issues concerning the Health (Community Pharmacy Contractor Agreement) Regulations, 1996 were resolved.
My view is that the derogation in Article 2.2 of Council Directive 85/433/EEC is not a satisfactory solution in the longer term. The Deputy will appreciate, however, that it would be premature to amend the regulations providing for the mutual recognition of qualifications until all legal issues concerning the Health (Community Pharmacy Contractor Agreement) Regulations, 1996, have been resolved.
Barr
Roinn