Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Thursday, 23 Nov 2000

Vol. 526 No. 5

Adjournment Debate. - Road Openings.

In recent years streets and roads in urban areas, particularly those in the greater Dublin area, have been continually wrecked and devastated by telecom operators, with subcontractors behaving like cowboys in an old gold rush film with repeated excavation. In one case a telecom company secretly excavated the excavation of another company in order to install an extra channel. The road network in the four county council areas, particularly in the north and west sides, has been devastated. For example, Dame Street has been excavated approximately 100 times over the past 20 months, while East Wall Road has been excavated 38 times and Beaumont Road in my constituency no less than 60 times in the past year. The same applies to an entire network of roads, including Kilmore Road, Tonlegee Road and Baldoyle Road.

On the Minister's instructions, local authorities have installed new bus lanes, cycle routes etc. on many roads in Dublin. However, within a few months of the installation of the new bus lane on the Malahide Road telecom cowboys destroyed it. There are similar examples throughout the north of the city. Local authorities do not receive a penny for these excavations, which are very dangerous. Last week in my constituency a 75 year old woman stumbled over an excavation, while I had the horrible experience of falling over a flagstone in Lower Exchange Street while rushing to a Dublin City Council meeting.

The Government is responsible for this chaos. There are 72 licensed operators claiming the right to excavate the streets, 11 of which are currently laying facilities on streets on the north side. For example, NTL is installing massive infrastructure to link up with the broadband network in Clonshaugh, while Esat, which is now British Telecom, Cable & Wireless, Worldcom, the City of London Telecom's COLT, are pulling streets and roads apart. All these companies claim the right to excavate. Local authorities do not receive a penny for these excavations which cause disturbance to pedestrians, cyclists and drivers and massive long-term damage to roads. In cases where excavations should be completed roads and streets are beginning to subside and holes are starting to appear.

Some months ago during the debate on the planning legislation, Deputy Gilmore identified the reason for the problem, that is, this area is governed by obsolete legislation, the Telegraph Act, 1863. When deregulation was introduced in 1996 and 1997 we should have had a major overhaul of this area, including the recasting of the Act or the introduction of new planning legislation to regulate the 71 companies which claim the absolute right to excavate streets and roads. The Minister for the Environment and Local Government, Deputy Dempsey, and the Minister for Public Enterprise, Deputy O'Rourke, are proposing a new infrastructure Bill which apparently will attempt to grapple with the key issue of property rights in subterranean areas and public spaces. We need a new telecom Bill to regulate the behaviour of these people and the amount of money they should pay for disrupting public space.

The core issue is that a valuable national resource, public streets and roads, are being seized and devastated by cowboy operators with impunity, and there has been no response to the problem by the Government to date. Local authorities are currently negotiating with the Association of Licensed Telecom Operators to put forward some solution but so far the Dublin City Manager, John Fitzgerald, the Fingal County Manager, Willie Soffe, and the road engineers in the two counties I represent have not received a response from the Government to repeated requests for legislation. Alternatively it could, as suggested by Deputy Gilmore, recast the planning legislation in such a way that there is control. We are totally exacerbated with the failure of the Government to regulate these utilities and introduce a proper legal structure against which they can operate.

The Minister, Deputy Dempsey, is unable to be present in the House to respond to his matter and has asked me to do so on his behalf.

I am pleased to have the opportunity to address the House on this important issue. There are extensive powers available to local authorities to control road openings. Section 101D of the Road Traffic Act, 1961, as inserted by the Dublin Transport Authority (Dissolution) Act, 1987, empowers prescribed road authorities to issue directions to statutory undertakers, including telecommunications operators, and others for the purpose of co-ordinating road openings and minimising traffic disruption. Under the Road Traffic (Co-ordination of Roadworks) Regulations, 1992, the following urban authorities are authorised to exercise these powers: Dublin Corporation, South Dublin County Council, Fingal County Council, Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown County Council and Cork, Limerick, Waterford and Galway Corporations.

General guidance on the need for an efficient and expeditious approach to the carrying out of road works, whether by road authorities or other statutory undertakers, is contained in the Department's memorandum on grants for non-national roads. Similar advice is issued to road authorities by the NRA in relation to national roads. The detailed operation of relevant controls is, however, the responsibility of the road authority concerned. Dublin Corporation is making extensive use of the powers vested in it through its Directions for the Control and Management of Roadworks in Dublin City.

The Telecommunications (Infrastructure) Bill, 1999, which is currently before the Seanad, proposes to modernise legislation in relation to road openings by telecom operators. It is designed to enhance local authority powers by obliging telecommunications operators to obtain the consent of the local authority before opening a road to lay underground telecommunications infrastructure. Under section 15 of the Bill, a local authority will be empowered to make its consent subject to conditions. Such conditions could involve a reduction in the number of telecommunications-related road openings by ensuring that road openings are co-ordinated, trenches are shared and spare ducts are laid for future use by other operators. In addition, the Minister recently indicated that he will consider the need for strengthening legislation to control road openings, and that process is currently under way. In the meantime the Minister has asked the Dublin Transportation Office, in consultation with local authorities in the DTO area, to assess to what extent the approaches taken to the opening and reinstatement of roads and paths for the installation of telecommunications infrastructure could be better managed.

As regards a possible strengthening of the statutory controls relating to road openings, there are a number of factors that must be taken into consideration when looking at these issue. On the one hand, there is considerable pressure to improve the telecom infrastructure, while the deregulation of the telecom market, together with the proliferation of telecom operators, has added to the pressure for rapid development and the extension of services in this area. On the other hand, such works cause considerable disruption and delays and need to be controlled in the public interest. Any additional regulation of road openings would, therefore, have to balance the interests of local communities and their desire to restrict road openings with those of the telecom sector and the acknowledged need to improve our telecom infrastructure. This approach is also reflected in the Telecommunications (Infrastructure) Bill.

Given the importance of the sector for the economy and in the interests of efficiency, it would also be important to ensure that any new system of controls on road openings is not overly bureaucratic or rigid as this could delay the provision of infrastructure and possibly lead to increased costs, which would be borne by the consumer. It must also be pointed out that the scope for strict regulation on road openings will be limited to some extent by the need to provide emergency access to underground infrastructure.

In so far as the period immediately ahead is concerned, the Dublin Transportation Office is preparing and co-ordinating Operation Freeflow 2000 with the other agencies concerned in order to optimise the management of traffic in the Dublin area during the traditionally busy pre-Christmas and new year period. Details of the Operation Freeflow 2000 programme, which will run from early December to mid-January 2001, are being finalised. No new roadworks, except emergency works, will be permitted from 1 December to 15 January 2001. All existing works must be ceased by 8 December at the latest.

It is clear, therefore, that efforts are being made to address this issue and that a balance must be struck which will cater for the interests of all parties concerned.

Barr
Roinn