Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Thursday, 23 Nov 2000

Vol. 526 No. 5

National Stud (Amendment) Bill, 2000: Second Stage (Resumed).

Question again proposed: "That the Bill be now read a Second Time."

When I moved the adjournment of the debate on 14 November, I was speaking about the new agreement that has been put in place for the governance of the thoroughbred sector and the racing industry generally. I am pleased agreement has finally been reached and has the support of all parties involved. The Minister will not be surprised to hear me say that some of the parties are not 100% happy with the arrangements, but it is not always possible to ensure that. It is important, however, that the strength of the views expressed by people who work in the industry, rather than those who work in governance, was taken into account by the relevant interests. That expression of support by the industry for a resolution of the outstanding issues was very useful and certainly helped to concentrate minds and bring the matter to a conclusion.

I look forward, therefore, to a new phase of successful development of racing for the enjoyment of punters, without whom the industry would not exist, as well as for the continued success of our breeders, trainers and owners. The industry generally is to be complimented on having taken a constructive and forward step.

I have one reservation about the new structure being put in place. On the last occasion we debated the Bill, I referred to the correspondents of the racing press who seem to have a very odd interpretation of the views they attribute to me. I would like them to take this view accurately into consideration, however. The controlling board of the new authority which will govern racing will be composed of a maximum of 13 people, but it is wrong that it will not include any voice for the punter. It seems absolutely nonsensical that we should embark on what I hope will be a new phase of development in the racing industry, yet the 13-member board will be composed of every interest except the punter's. The Minister should know perfectly well – as does my colleague, Deputy McGahon, who has just joined me – that this industry could not exist without the punters.

To my cost.

If we did not have people who like to watch horseracing and bet on it, we would not have an industry. Yet, we have a governing board which has no specific representation for punters. This is absolutely crazy. Punters are the final consumers of the product of the industry.

The Minister will have to bring forward legislation to give effect to the new structure. While I look forward to seeing and going through it with him, I urge the Minister, in preparing the legislation, to remedy this serious deficiency in the structure of the board. I ask him to take this matter seriously. I do not like to criticise people who are not in the House and do not have an opportunity to defend themselves, but let me say in the most neutral way I can that previous provisions for the representation of punters in the old regime were very far from satisfactory. Rather arbitrary choices were made and I am not satisfied that the interests of punters were represented. I will not say any more; the Minister knows exactly what I mean. There is an opportunity to remedy this in the legislation.

While I know an agreement has been made that there will be a maximum of 13 on the board and that, unwisely, an agreement has been made by the Ministers as to who they will be and from where they will be drawn, they do not include punters.

While they may not represent them, they will include punters.

They do not include people who represent the interests of punters.

They might put me on it.

While I know they include people who will have a very tender regard for the outside interests of Deputy Power, they do not include people who represent the interests of those who are Deputy Power's customers. They should.

The Minister is a good customer.

I would like to see reasonable representation. I do not want to see a proposal in the Bill under which the Minister for Agriculture, Food and Rural Development and-or the Minister for Finance will designate persons. No, there are other places to where one can go to look for representatives of punters. If one had a ballot at a decent race course, one would get good representatives of punters who would bring the specific dimension that they have in mind to the work of governing the industry. It should not be forgotten that at the end of the day punters are the consumers of the product of the industry and that it could not exist without them.

In the same connection, breeders, trainers and owners will, ultimately, benefit from an improvement in the facilities available to punters at race courses. As the Minister, probably, knows better than I do because he enjoys them more often than I do – best of luck to him – there are a number of race courses where very substantial improvements have been made in recent years in the level of facilities available to punters. I am sure the Minister will agree there is nothing to match the Curragh. Punchestown has been hugely improved in recent years. Leopardstown makes a good fist of being a top class race course and venue. Cork race course or Mallow, as some of the old-fashioned among us prefer to call it, has also been hugely improved in recent years.

While I agree there has been a good deal of investment to make the circumstances of life easier and more congenial for punters at many race courses, I know the Minister will agree that there are still a great many race courses where it would be a kindness to describe the facilities for punters as rudimentary. There are places where one has to be really dedicated to enjoy one's day at the races. There are a good many race courses where the basic facilities which punters need – without specifying it any further, all the normal amenities of life, including the opportunity to get something to eat or drink – are a good deal less than satisfactory.

I hope the new authority will turn its attention to these issues and that we will see as rapidly as possible an improvement in conditions at the race courses concerned. We cannot, unfortunately, always bank on having good weather at the races. I have enjoyed racing at race courses where the facilities are a wee bit rudimentary on a nice day. On a fine day none of us minds being out in the elements; it is when the weather is inclement that the quality of the facilities becomes particularly important. I hope this will be a priority item for the work of the new governing body advised by good, articulate and representative spokespersons on behalf of punters without whom, I insist, the industry could not exist.

The industry has made great progress in recent years. I am delighted that year after year the Irish racing industry generally, in all its facets, adds to its reputation. I hope this new governance system will help to maintain its progress. I look forward to seeing the legislation.

I support the provisions of the Bill. I am glad it has been brought forward. I hope the Minister will take account of the few suggestions I have made for amendments to the Bill on Committee Stage. I hope, in particular, that the Minister and the Minister for Finance will get rid of the excessively bureaucratic concern with always having the right to second guess the board of the National Stud on important issues and drop from the Bill the unnecessary provision under which the two Ministers will be able to keep looking over the shoulder of the National Stud if they are of the view it will make a substantial amount of money from the sale of property. This is important. I am sure it is bound to happen some time within the course of development, but if it is felt that all or a large part of the lands currently held by the National Stud should be sold – on which pressures will be exerted from surrounding develop ment – and it looks as if it will make a large amount of money, as foreseen by the Bill, I would want the Ministers to bear in mind that the land will have to be replaced, that new yards will have to be built and all the other facilities that go with the stud will have to be installed. A move in those circumstances would, obviously, make it much more difficult to run an integrated operation with the Japanese Garden. It would also be expensive and create a new situation. The Ministers, therefore, should not retain the opportunity to interfere in this unnecessarily.

I welcome the Bill, which is straightforward. It aims to update the statutory framework under which the National Stud currently operates. As a Deputy for south Kildare, I am only too well aware of the enormous contribution the National Stud makes, internationally, nationally and locally. Like many other Members, I am an ardent supporter of its work. I take the opportunity to congratulate the Minister, who is a strong supporter of the equine industry and his officials on the publication of the legislation.

I will not dwell too long on the details of the Bill, the background to which the Minister has explained as well as the reasoning behind each section. Section 2 deals with the lands from which the National Study currently operates and changes the existing arrangements whereby these lands are held on licence from the Minister by transferring them to the National Stud. This is a welcome move. The Bill includes safeguards which require ministerial consent for the sale of any lands and provides for a dividend for the Exchequer in such a scenario. This is a sensible and logical section as the practice of holding land on licence introduced a degree of uncertainty. I am pleased this is being dealt with.

Sections 4 and 6 are complementary and enable the National Stud to increase investment in its core facilities in Kildare and in other ventures into which it may enter. I strongly support the provision in section 6 to increase the upper borrowing limit from £5 million to £20 million. This will enable the National Stud to plan for the future and enter into exciting commercial developments over the coming years.

I am glad section 5 makes explicit reference to tourist-related activities that are now an intrinsic part of the National Stud in Kildare town. The National Stud, the Japanese Gardens and the new garden are three major attractions in Kildare and the development of these facilities over recent years has been of great benefit to the local economy and that of the county. The National Stud is now a vital part of the tourism infrastructure in Kildare and has developed this role in partnership with the local community, county councils and public representatives. It is a role that has the full support of the people in Kildare and I am anxious to see this partnership develop. It would be remiss of me not to compliment the staff under the manager, John Clarke, and everyone involved with the development of the facilities at the stud. There have been major improvements to the infrastructure. The presentation of the area is exceptional and augurs well for the future. The design and creation of the new gardens together with the car parking and dining facilities have made this an obvious tourist attraction. If you pass by it any day of the week you will see that bus tours include it on their itineraries That is welcome.

The presence of the National Stud and its engagement in tourism activities in recent years has brought great economic benefit to Kildare town. Unfortunately, Kildare town, like other parts of my constituency, has suffered from the closure of traditional industries. Unemployment is still a significant problem and the direct and indirect jobs created by tourism are crucial to Kildare town and its hinterland. I look forward to the development of the tourism role played by the National Stud and the increased borrowing facility under the Bill that will give it freedom to enter into joint ventures will be beneficial.

The Bill deals with an important aspect of the horse industry. This is an important and growing industry and I hope the Minister will reply to the points I make. Concern has been expressed by a number of small horse breeders regarding the new foal levy introduced in July. I would appreciate it if the Minister would indicate how this levy was applied in the first six months of its application. Small breeders are convinced that the restructuring of the levy will result in them paying more under the new scheme. They may well have a case and if their suspicions are correct, I hope the Minister will move to restructure this levy so the small players in this industry will get a fair crack of the whip. A related issue is the representation of small breeders at national level. The Irish Thoroughbred Breeders Association is an effective and constructive lobby. However, it does not represent all breeders, particularly those who operate on a small basis. These breeders often feel excluded from negotiations at national level. I do not believe this is healthy for the industry. I urge the Minister to encourage such breeders to establish an effective organisation that would ensure the views of smaller and part-time breeders are fully ventilated.

This is important as the Department is currently working on legislation to restructure horse racing following from the recent understanding reached between the Minister for Agriculture, Food and Rural Development, the Minister for Finance and the Turf Club. As a great supporter of the racing industry, I am glad the unseemly row between the Government and the Turf Club has been resolved. The agreement reached provides a solid base for the racing industry to develop. I await, with interest, the legislation that will be introduced.

As Deputy Dukes stated in regard to Kildare, we have seen the benefit of the financial input made by the Government of the day into the three courses in Kildare. Punchestown has developed into a racetrack that can rival anything in the UK. Further developments there have made it into a major attraction that will challenge Cheltenham as the Mecca for national hunt racing. That is welcome. The recent restructuring at Naas was badly needed. The management has put a wonderful facility in place for the punter. Management at the Curragh want to improve facilities there.

What about the Sam Maguire?

We might get that next year.

Powers will give the Deputy odds.

However, we do not seem to be able to attract the numbers to Punchestown and Naas that visit the National Stud. The Mecca of track racing, the Curragh, does not attract the crowds that one would expect. There may be a bumper crowd on one or two occasions but given the facilities there, attendance is small. It does not lead to attractive fields or to the punter getting value for money when account is taken of the entrance fee and so on. The Minister should look at that and see what can be done to increase attendance at the Curragh. Deputy Power also knows that there would be a larger crowd at any rural race course than there is at a meeting in the Curragh. The Minister is aware of that as he is in attendance at any meeting I have attended there, supporting the cause. It may be that it is difficult when you have true thoroughbreds to get numbers for the particular races. At the end of the day, the punter wants to be able to gamble and get value for money. If in an eight race card there are small fields and the prices are not good, punters will not attend. The advantage of the national hunt is that there may be 20 or 30 horses in every race and you get value for the money you put on. Perhaps the Minister will indicate the Department's and Turf Club's thinking on this issue.

I hope the Minister will comment on the enforcement of the minimum wage legislation in the industry. I know the vast majority of stud owners, trainers and breeders pay their workers a fair wage. It must be accepted that, in the past, a small number of operators abused the dedication of young people by paying them very poorly. Unrepresented by a trade union and anxious to make a career in the industry these workers were often left open to abuse. Now that there is minimum wage legislation I would appreciate it if the Minister would assure the House that the scandal of law pay is a thing of the past in the horse industry and that inspections carried out by the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment confirm this.

Will the Minister comment on the tax free status that applies to stallion fees? As a representative for south Kildare I know only too well the benefit of this fiscal incentive to the horse industry and I would argue strongly for its retention. However, I understand that at present the tax incentive means that returns regarding the operation of these businesses do not need to be made to the authorities. This situation gives cause for concern and flies in the face of the new corporate enforcement regime which the Government is intent on introducing. I am in favour of the retention of zero rating but it would be in the interests of the industry if this sector were required to make returns to the authorities so there can be a clear picture regarding the turnover and profitability of the industry.

I welcome the Bill. It updates and reforms the legislation under which the National Stud currently operates and this is a welcome development. I particularly welcome the recognition in the Bill of the key role the National Stud plays in the tourism industry and I sincerely hope the management of the stud will use the new borrowing and joint venture facility to enhance its role in this vital industry.

This Bill is straightforward. The Minister outlined his plans recently and they are to increase the share capital of the company from £10 million to £25 million and to increase its borrowing powers from £5 million to £20 million. This is necessary and will allow the stud to purchase top class stallions, the secret of the stud's continued success. Its record in this regard has been excellent in recent years and the House should give the stud every opportunity to continue that success.

It is also proposed to allow the National Stud purchase and sell land, subject to the consent of the Minister. As the Minister, Deputy Walsh, explained last week, some of the land owned by the stud will be required for the Kildare bypass so the stud will have to dispose of it. I would be happier if the stud were given a freer hand to deal with these matters. We are lucky to have a Minister for Agriculture, Food and Rural Development and a Minister for Finance who are interested in the racing industry but that will not always be so. I do not expect them to leave office in the near future but—

What are the odds?

—we have to look to the long-term.

The racing industry is important for most people in County Kildare. Apart from providing employment to many families throughout the county, it is a great leisure resource. My family is particularly fond of the National Stud and Japanese Gardens and we visit them frequently during the year. It has become the most popular place to visit on important occasions such as birthdays, First Communions and Confirmations. That is the case for many families.

This House regularly criticises people or groups when things go wrong but there are few headlines to be made with good news. The story of the National Stud and Japanese Gardens is a good news story and it is important that its success be acknowledged. We should thank the management and workers who have contributed to this success. The stud and gardens are a great tourist attraction and will continue to be because the management has been progressive and innovative. In recent years it has continued to upgrade facilities and provide new ones. St. Fiachra's garden is an example of the wonderful progress that has been made and the tourists are responding to it. Last year there were 128,000 visitors. That figure is expected to increase this year to £145,000.

The National Stud has been forward looking and progressive and we are grateful for its efforts. A proposal to build a museum of the horse is under consideration and I hope it becomes a reality. It would be an excellent attraction at the stud.

The Irish bloodstock industry is well respected throughout the world. Despite Ireland's size and small population, the country has achieved extraordinary success on the international stage. We have shown a great ability to breed, train and ride the best racehorses in the world. This year will be seen as probably one of our best. It will be memorable due to the wonderful successes both on the flat and over jumps. Last March, the wonderful Istabraq won its third champion hurdle at Cheltenham. I had the pleasure of being there to witness it although I will not say that I backed the horse.

Then there was the father and son combination of Ted and Ruby Walsh winning both the English and Irish Grand Nationals. Ted was honoured recently when the Minister for Finance presented him with the title of "Kildare Person of the Year". People can identify with Ted Walsh. He speaks a language the people of Kildare understand and there could be no better winner of the prize. The wins in these races were followed by the great success of Sinndar, trained by John Oxx and ridden by Johnny Murtagh. They won both the English Derby and the Irish Derby and finished the season by winning the Prix de l'Arc de Triomphe, a feat not previously achieved.

I pay tribute to Sinndar's owner, the Aga Khan. He did not need the prize money and was unfortunate to put a previous derby winner, Shergar, at stud in Ireland. That horse was kidnapped – the kidnapping was discussed in this House the night it happened – and was never found. The Aga Khan had good reason to move his horses out of the country and to forget about Ireland but he did not. He stayed loyal to this country and, I am happy to report, he has been rewarded.

Sinndar's jockey, Johnny Murtagh, had a dream year. He won ten group one races before finishing his season with a wonderful success in the Breeders Cup. This young man is a great example to people from all walks of life. He had his share of difficulties in the past but he did not give up. His trainer, John Oxx, showed tremendous faith and loyalty to him and it was wonder ful to see their hard work rewarded in such a marvellous way.

I should probably mention the success of Members from both sides of the House who are part of a 17 member syndicate called the Grand Alliance. It is probably the only matter on which there is full agreement among them. The alliance was formed a little over two years ago and purchased a horse called Arctic Copper. It has had tremendous success in bumpers, hurdles and, lately, chases. Many Members are already making their plans for Cheltenham next year and I wish them well. Their success clearly demonstrates the wonderful fun and enjoyment that can be had from horse racing for a small outlay. Other syndicates might not enjoy the same success but horse racing is a source of great enjoyment. It is important to advertise that and encourage more syndicates to get together.

There was a tradition at one time of horses running in the name of the President of Ireland. Given the wonderful success of the National Stud and its sires, this is an opportune time for horses to run in the colours of our President once again. It is a great way of advertising the racing industry and I urge the Minister to encourage the President, if she needs encouragement, to resume this practice. It would mean a great deal to the industry to see the President's colours on the race track again and I hope we will not have to wait long for it to happen.

Last December the Minister for Finance and the Minister for Agriculture, Food and Rural Development offered a wonderful opportunity to the racing industry. They offered to double its funding if the IHA and the Turf Club would agree to merge. While agreement has now been reached, it was not easy. Some were reluctant to accept the establishment of one body to look after racing but these fears quickly disappeared when hundreds of people, including owners, breeders, trainers, jockeys and stable staff, protested at the delay in reaching agreement. I am delighted that agreement has been reached and that the Minister for Agriculture, Food and Rural Development will bring his legislative proposals before Cabinet early in the new year.

The racing industry appreciates the interest shown by both Ministers. While it is welcome that the funding for the racing industry will be doubled, it is important that the money is spread evenly. Group races are important To maintain our status in world racing, we must have top class racing. It is important that the extra money provided to the industry is spread throughout it and that those in need of an injection of funds are given it. We have more than 700 licensed trainers or permit holders, many of whom will not train a winner during the year. For some it is a labour of love, but it is important we do not take that for granted. We should try to make matters as easy as possible for such trainers. Many people put a good deal of money into the industry, but we cannot assume that will continue.

Anyone involved in the racing industry will be aware of the major developments that have taken place in recent years. Prize money has increased significantly and facilities at many of the race tracks have been upgraded. There has been a realisation of the necessity to provide the customer with what he or she wants. Punters have witnessed major improvements at race tracks and no doubt this has contributed to the increase in attendances at race meetings. While I welcome the progress the industry has made, the benefits have been enjoyed by the breeders, trainers and jockeys. One sector of the industry, the stable staff, has been forgotten. Vast sums of money were spent in providing new facilities for customers at race tracks, but very little was spent on improving facilities for stable staff. Most race course managers did not care and did not want to know. Facilities for stable staff at most race tracks are not acceptable. These staff are forced to work in an environment which employees in any other industry would not tolerate. The basic facilities one would expect in employment are not available. Proper toilet and hot food facilities, particularly in winter months, are generally not available and where hot food is available, in many cases staff must pay an exorbitant price for it. That cannot continue.

The Stable Staff Association was set up a little more than a year ago, following which all race tracks were asked to ensure the facilities available are of an acceptable standard. I thank particularly the Minister for Agriculture, Food and Rural Development for the interest he has shown in this area. He met representatives of that association on a number of occasions and has been very helpful. On his insistence, some race tracks decided to take action, but progress has been slow. We want to ensure major improvements take place quickly.

The bloodstock industry employs more than 20,000 people in the breeding, training, riding or minding of horses. If we did not have breeders, we would not have an industry. The same applies to trainers, jockeys and equally to stable staff. I look forward to the setting up of a new unified structure, Horseracing Ireland, and to a member of the stable staff taking a seat on that body.

A number of serious problems require urgent attention. A serious staff shortage exists in the industry. It is difficult to attract new people to the industry and to retain them. The British bloodstock industry is experiencing similar difficulties and it decided to take action. The British Horseracing Board set up a review group, the Stable Staff Resources Study Group, under the chairmanship of Lady Burnham to examine the wider issues of stable staff recruitment. It is vital that a similar study be carried out in Ireland. Employment in the racing industry has lost much of its attractiveness. People are happier taking up other employment where better working conditions, pay and shorter working hours are much more attractive.

Many changes have taken place recently in the industry, including Sunday racing, night racing and a continuity of racing during the summer months. Those changes have placed major demands on stable staff who must leave home early in the morning and do not arrive back until late at night, get up early the next morning, ride out and then perhaps go to a race meeting. Those changes were introduced without consulting stable staff. If we want to be progressive and secure the future of the industry, it is important we do not take any sector for granted. They all play an important part in the racing industry. We cherish that industry in Kildare and throughout the country. If we are serious about it, it is important to ensure everyone concerned is given a voice in its operation.

A pension fund was established in the industry some years ago and while this was a progressive move, it has not had the desired results. The qualification criteria are far too restrictive. That coupled with the industry finding it difficult to retain employees as they get older, means very few employees draw from the pension fund. Changes will have to be made in that regard, as it does not make sense to have a pension fund that is increasing in value, while fewer and fewer people draw from it.

The introduction of the stable staff bonus scheme should have been a wonderful development for the racing industry. The payment of a percentage of prize money to stable staff was a good idea. It was viewed by the staff as an acknowledgement of their contribution and an opportunity to collect a few extra pounds. That scheme was introduced at the start of the summer, but it has turned out to be a disaster. Revenue decided that trainers should pay PRSI at a rate of 8.5% on the bonus, despite their having no real role in the payment. Their only role in the scheme is that of a facilitator. The agreement under which the bonus is paid is reached among the staff. The money is paid from the turf club to the yards where it is divided among the staff. The money is not sent out to the yards unless an agreement is forwarded to the turf club. Unfortunately, many of the trainers have failed to submit an agreement.

The scheme was introduced and from 1 May 330 trainers or permit holders were eligible for a distribution of these moneys, but 135 of them have not collected what is required, as no agreement has been forwarded to the turf club. This is extraordinary and should not be allowed to continue. Money is lying in the turf club account that should be in the pockets of stable staff and Revenue has made a demand on the trainers that cannot be justified. I took up this with the Minister for Social Community and Family Affairs, Deputy Dermot Ahern, and the Minister for Finance, Deputy McCreevy, as the manner in which the scheme is being operated does not make sense. If it could be regularised and operated properly, it could have a very beneficial effect on the racing industry. It is something on which we can improve.

People from Kildare are very much aware of the Race Centre set up some years ago. Its objective is to take in young people and provide them with quality training. We often read of the successes of Frankie Dettori, Michael Kinnane and Johnny Murtagh, but very few of the people who enter the industry with the intention of becoming jockeys succeed. The idea behind the setting up of the Race Centre was to provide quality training for young people who would be trained in all aspects of the bloodstock industry. While we are now experiencing an economic boom, prior to that boom, the Race Centre was able to provide employment for all of its trainees on completion of their training, something very few other bodies could claim. Consideration is being given to the setting up of a farrier school at the Race Centre. The Minister has taken an interest in that and the Taoiseach visited the centre recently. I ask them to be as helpful as possible in ensuring the school is set up. Anyone involved in the racing industry will realise the necessity for farriers. It is a trade and a skill we should not lose.

I compliment all those involved in the Race Centre for their tremendous dedication. Many older people who have retired from the industry give of their time and wisdom to the young people. That is appreciated by those young people and their parents.

I thank the Minister and the Minister for Finance for their interest in the industry. I do not want to be one-sided and Deputy Dukes contributed earlier. He has other business this afternoon.

What are the odds?

In a previous existence I went to see Deputy Dukes about a reduction in the betting duty – it was 20% at the time – and in fairness to him he listened to our arguments and took the necessary action in the budget at the time. I compliment him for that. Many people might not have understood or accepted why he was being so helpful to the racing industry. We are fortunate to have Members who are interested in this industry. Perhaps some take too much of an interest in it but there is an appreciation of the importance of the industry.

I welcome the Bill and thank the Minister. I am sure the Bill will have a speedy passage.

It is great to see racing elevated as a priority for discussion here. When I became a Member it was never mentioned because previous Ministers for Agriculture did not see it as part of their remit. Racing was left to run on its own but that changed with the arrival of Deputies Yates and Walsh. I pay tribute to their interest in racing, albeit from different angles.

I am conscious of being under the baleful gaze of the Joe Rooks on the backbenches and must be mindful of what I say. The pride of Kildare Deputies in representing the home of the horse is evident in this debate. I sympathise with their lack of success in Croke Park.

We had a wee success.

I hope Mick O'Dwyer's comment about the curse is just public house talk and that he was wrongly represented.

It is a long time since 1957.

I wish them the best of luck and I will talk to Deputy Power about procuring likely odds. I know he has opted for politics full time. I find that hard to understand when other Deputies are getting into that lucrative business; it is a licence to print money according to John Banks.

In supporting the Bill, I congratulate the Minister on his vision in promoting the Mallow project. I was opposed to that initially on the grounds that it was the worst performing track in Ireland and had waterlogging difficulties. I visited it to my cost last Sunday as a part owner. I came out a chastened man but I was heartened by what has been created. It is a lovely racecourse with tremendous facilities. I hope the people of Munster, particularly those of Cork, give it the support it deserves and I withdraw any previous criticism I made of that investment.

This country can claim to lead the world in few areas but horseracing is one. The climate, which acts both as a deterrent to tourists and an incentive to Irish people to holiday abroad, is most conducive to breeding horses. Whatever is in the green grass of Ireland is a tremendous asset to the breeding industry. Deputies Wall and Power referred to the extraordinary success not just of Irish horses but of Irish jockeys. That is a source of wonder to the racing industry. Traditionally, because of stronger interests in national hunt racing, Irish jockeys dominated the English racing scene. Now we have a corresponding increase in successful flat jockeys due to Mick Kinane and Pat Eddery, the daddy of them all, who have now been joined by Willie Supple, John Egan, Sean Kelly, Neil Callan and Jamie Spencer. Any Irish jockey who shows promise and goes to England is immediately seized upon, he is guaranteed rides and success. That industry deserves the support of the Government, which had been lukewarm towards it until recently. I look forward to the new legislation which is to come before the House after Christmas.

I echo Deputy Power's appreciation of the efforts and loyalty of the Aga Khan to Irish racing and to the Oxx family. I also applaud the success of the gentleman of Irish racing, John Oxx, who is so unassuming for a man who has scaled the heights of racing. In relation to loyalty, I commend John Oxx on his loyalty to Johnny Murtagh at a time when the latter's career was in the balance.

Deputy Wall lamented the lack of support for the Curragh. The Curragh racetrack is on a par with those in Europe. Its facilities compare favourably with Longchamps and put Epsom in the shade. Flat racing in Ireland is not as appreciated as jumping and, as a hapless punter for over 50 years, I have often wondered why, as the element of chance is in jump racing. I need sedatives to watch steeplechasing, while specialising in bumpers and Irish form is a recipe for needing a psychiatrist. I prefer flat racing.

The real cause of the lack of support for the Curragh is that it was dominated for years by Vincent O'Brien, the master of Ballydoyle, one of the world's best trainers. Unfortunately, his succession of odds-on winners at the Curragh turned many punters away. He has now been followed by another man all Ireland is proud of, Aidan O'Brien, who also dominates racing. That does not leave much for the small owner and the odds at which the Joe Rooks the books put up prices mean punters will take a chance in a 30 runner maiden hurdle rather than punting on the flat. However, the facilities and top class racing offered at the Curragh are as good as any available in Europe and it is a pity more people do not go there.

Perhaps the horse racing industry would examine ways and means of broadening the appeal of flat racing to the average punter. While steeplechasing can be attractive to the bingo hunter who wants to get a little bit of money, the serious punters are identified with flat racing. The success of the entire racing industry centres on the flat racing industry because many small owners and trainers have farms and other businesses, all the serious stuff, and the money procured at Goff sales and other sales throughout the country are for top class flat racers. That is where the money is in the breeding industry.

The one concern I have concerns the subsuming of the Turf Club into the new horse racing authority, which was not easily achieved. While it is a good move I would like to pay tribute to the Turf Club for its efforts over the years. From the beginning of racing in this country it did a fair job. Perhaps it has outlived its era but it certainly did a reason able job in helping the industry get established and acknowledged by racing industries throughout the world. I hope there will be a continued role for the Turf Club, albeit in a reduced area, because the new Tsars of Irish racing could be the Coolmore Stud, Mr. Magnier and, dare I say it, Mr. Brosnan, all of whom have made a major contribution to the industry but domination and monopoly is not what we want in the racing industry.

Deputy Dukes also made a contribution to the racing industry and he could be termed the punter's friend for his memorable gesture. I have to take issue with Deputy Power on this one, who claimed the credit for the reduction.

I did not claim the credit at all.

It was all down to Deputy McCreevy and myself who made a memorable TV—

Confession.

I remember it well.

—confession at Naas race track when we said that we were tax evaders. We incurred the wrath of many sanctimonious people.

I think it was to save the Deputy's embarrassment.

We were even mentioned in The Times and the Financial Times. Imagine Members of Parliament baring their souls and confessing that they were tax evaders. We were not tax evaders. The Joe Rooks were the tax evaders and I take this opportunity of informing the national groaner, Gene Kerrigan, from the Sunday Independent, that Deputy McCreevy and I were not tax evaders; it was the bookmakers who accepted the bets. However, our confession resulted in a reduction of the penal tax from 20% to 10% with a consequent benefit to the Exchequer. Happy days have now arrived. There is no tax on Irish racing at the tote and, I hope the Minister Deputy McCreevy will continue his role and reduce it a little bit further or even eliminate it in the offices. While Deputy Power may have made a sizeable impression on it, it was our public confession that worked. The one disappointment that resulted from that was that I felt every bookmaker in Ireland should have a photograph of Deputy McCreevy and me up on the wall, and the occasional free bet, but that did not happen.

I wish the racing industry continued success. It is great to have a racing Minister who enjoys racing. Perhaps he would like to join another syndicate at some time in the future. Deputy Bradford had an unhappy experience—

Very unhappy.

—and I take this opportunity of apologising to him and to my other friends in the House who went down the road with me.

Former friends.

They chose the wrong syndicate. I congratulate Deputy Walsh on his well known commitment to racing and I look forward to the legislation he will produce before the next election.

I congratulate the Minister and his officials for bringing the Bill before the House. I am particularly pleased with its contents as one who has a long-standing interest in horses and the bloodstock industry.

In my experience, most Irish people have an affinity with horses and all aspects of horse racing. The international standing of our bloodstock industry is very high, and deservedly so. That reputation is in no small part due to the consistently high profile and name for quality and excellence enjoyed by our National Stud. That is a great achievement for a small nation. Our horses and jockeys are excellent and are a continuing source of national pride. Along with Deputy McGahon I would like to pay tribute to Mr. Oxx for the way he treated Johnny Murtagh, who is now back in top form. Great credit is due to Johnny Murtagh and Mr. Oxx and I would like to congratulate them on their continued success.

It is important that we acknowledge our gratitude to the board, management and staff of this enterprise who have kept this nation in the international limelight over the years. The National Stud is a well managed enterprise which has been raking in solid profits in recent years in particular. For example, in 1998 the profits were £400,000 and they were more than £600,000 in 1999. That is a good success story. The management adhered to its task but has also been concerned to introduce innovative developments directly linked to its core business. Also, the stud has continually attempted to widen its business base of operations so that it is not dependent on one stallion or one brood mare for its results. That is a long-term process, as we all know. It is part of the strategic vision to which the stud is committed and the Bill's provisions will be welcomed by the board and management as broadening the statutory framework within which they operate by increasing the business opportunities and the financing mechanisms available to them.

The bloodstock industry is a labour intensive one and wage costs have been under pressure in a tightening labour market. It is of vital importance that the stud is able to attract and retain experienced, quality staff. We have a problem in that area in that stable boys are very underpaid, somewhere in the region of £250 per week. That should be examined because it is important that we retain the existing good staff. If we do that the stud will be even more attractive and will be able to expand into other areas of the business.

The acquisition costs of stallions and brood mares are also under pressure in a rising market because the increased capitalisation by the Minister, and the increased borrowing powers to be provided by the Bill, will confer a huge degree of financial flexibility on the stud in terms of its ability to meet ongoing management challenges and those posed by diversification. One of the significant diversifications has been into the stallion syndicates. One of the major benefits of our growing international reputation as a provider of quality stallions is the support we receive from breeders who purchase shares in stallion syndicates. Such shareholders receive regular information on a stallion's stud performance and comprehensive financial accounts at the end of each season. This support is vital to the further development of the industry.

I welcome the provision in section 7 which allows the stud to establish subsidiary companies and also that section 8 permits it to acquire shares in other companies. These are normal and unremarkable commercial freedoms but are very welcome. I also welcome the stud's ability to participate in joint ventures as provided in section 9. Section 5 of the Bill is particularly important in that, in addition to clarifying the stud's remit, it permits its engagement in outside business operations such as, for example, participation in stallion syndicates where stallions may be kept outside the stud farm for part of the year.

The vesting of land occupied by the stud and its licences is also to be welcomed and reflects the fact that the stud is a mature and responsible business operation which should have the freedom to operate and develop its own lands for appropriate business purposes and opportunities, consistent with its aims and objectives.

Tourism is an important element of the stud's operations. For example, the Japanese gardens attract many visitors. The stud recently opened the new St. Fiachra's gardens which will significantly add to its attractiveness to visitors. I also welcome the fact that this dimension of the stud's activities has been recognised in section 5 of the Bill.

I welcome the Bill as it will greatly enhance the industry. I thank the Minister and his officials for their tremendous support for the stud and I wish it well for the future. I commend the Bill to the House.

I welcome the opportunity to contribute to the debate on this Bill. However, like other speakers I may drift beyond the parameters of the Bill and comment on the Irish racing industry. Deputy McGahon regaled and amused us with his lecture on what he did and did not do in times past. The Deputy mentioned his attempts to involve and encourage his Oireachtas colleagues to take an interest in racing.

The Deputy is settling old scores.

Deputy McGahon has put a few syndicates together but the Minister for Health and Children should ensure that some health or financial warnings are attached to the Deputy's syndicates as they are not good for one's pocket or one's mental health.

I will have to leave the House as I cannot take this anymore.

One should stay well away from Deputy McGahon's invitations. This Bill is important for the Irish National Stud. Deputies Wall and Power pointed out that Kildare is synonymous with Irish racing through the Curragh and the plains of Kildare. There was a time when the National Stud was seen as the beacon of the Irish racing industry but that is no longer the case. We need to address this issue and examine the operations of the stud, what it is and should be doing and how it is preparing for the new millennium.

There was a time when the Irish breeding industry looked to the National Stud as the Mecca of thoroughbred horse breeding but that is no longer the case. Two of the greatest stud farms in the world, Coolmore and Rathbarry, are based in Tipperary and Cork, respectively. We also have many other stud farms of international renown. It may be that the National Stud is finding it difficult to compete financially but most people involved in horse breeding do not look at the stud in the same way as heretofore.

Competition is welcome and it is great to see Coolmore, Rathbarry and other stud farms thriving. However, we must give particular attention to the future of the National Stud. It is disappointing that, to the best of my knowledge, the stud no longer stands stallions for national hunt racing. Every stallion standing at the stud is a flat racing stallion. We need to address this issue and the Minister should raise the matter with the stud's directors.

Deputy McGahon referred to flat racing but from an international perspective, Ireland is regarded as the home of national hunt racing. In this context it is remiss of the stud's management that genuine national hunt horses are not standing at their home base in Kildare. If this trend continues the National Stud will come to be seen as the home of the Japanese gardens and retired race horses such as Danoli and Vintage Crop, rather than a centre of breeding excellence. I acknowledge that the National Stud has some top quality flat racing stallions but that is only half the picture. The other half of the picture needs to be addressed. I may be incorrect, but to the best of my knowledge the National Stud does not stand national hunt stallions. In light of this fact, the stud's description as the showcase of Irish racing and breeding no longer applies.

The stud management courses run by the National Stud are admirable and internationally renowned and must be encouraged. It is important that as many young people as possible obtain the level of training available at the stud. There is always a phenomenal demand for the courses which far outstrips supply. Students from the Middle East, Japan, Australia and all over the world come to Ireland to take advantage of the stud's fine courses in stud management and thoroughbred breeding. This is an important part of the stud's activities and it has done a great job in this regard.

I concur with Deputy Wall's comments on the foal levy. From his deep involvement and interest in the industry, the Minister will be aware that smaller breeders in particular feel that, once again, they are being sidelined and possibly ignored. The formula devised for the levy militates against those at the lower end of the market. While Irish racing is quite strong in every respect, unless new people become involved on a continual basis, there is no guarantee of long-term success. New people coming into the industry will enter at the lower price level but few incentives are available for such people. I accept that people are paying extraordinary prices for bloodstock as a consequence of the booming economy. This is good if one is selling but it causes problems if one is buying.

Some of the people who have recently entered horse racing and breeding will not remain in the industry if the going gets tough. Those who will stay are the smaller breeders and farmers but, unfortunately, these people are being offered no incentives.

I raised the matter of incentives previously with the Minister. The tax exemption on stallion fees is a huge incentive. I have no difficulty with it and I welcome it. It has transformed the breeding and racing industry. However, we are giving 100% of the incentives to one section of the market. On the other side of the equation, there is no incentive for the small breeder and the man or woman who might own one, two or three thoroughbred mares. The Minister needs to examine putting in place incentives for that sector of the market to ensure those people will remain involved in the racing and breeding industry and to try to encourage more people in. On current economic figures it is perhaps not as much a loss leading activity as it was in previous years but everything is cyclical, times will get tougher again and those people need to be encouraged to remain in the industry by way of appropriate incentives.

In that regard I trust the Minister's work, which has come to fruition in the creation of a unified body for the future of the Irish horse racing industry and Irish horse breeding industry, will be helpful. We had an opportunity here on several occasions during Adjournment Debates to comment on the amalgamation and it was a long, slow and painful process for all concerned. However, a good, fair and balanced result was achieved. During the course of that debate, as the public tuned into it, the Turf Club personnel received a slightly unfair representation. They were seen as people who were almost deliberately trying to hold back progress. Down through the years, people in the Turf Club did tremendous good for racing. I said in the House some months ago that times had changed, that we needed to change the structures and the Turf Club had to change. We must recognise that on the whole its contribution to racing has been enormous and it has been very beneficial. I am sure those people will continue under the new structures to give the level of service and commitment they have to date. I wish the Minister well in what he is attempting to do with the new structures. They will be beneficial to the industry.

I hope those people who will have more direct responsibility for planning racing fixtures, examining prize money and all the components of the bigger picture will look again at the type of racing available in the flat racing sector of the market. Unfortunately, unless one is now a very wealthy owner it is very difficult to get into flat racing. The person who can only afford a £3,000, £4,000 or £5,000 yearling literally has no chance of winning a race with that horse. We must try to reschedule our racing calendar so there is an opportunity for those animals and for their owners to win some level of prize money. It is a known fact that anybody involved in racing does not get into the game for the money. If one can minimise losses one is doing well, but for the person who would like to get involved in flat racing with only £3,000, £4,000 or £5,000 or up to £10,000 to pay for a yearling, the chances of winning a race with that type of animal under the present conditions of Irish racing are almost as low as winning the lotto. That is a formula which can be changed with the political input of the Minister and with an understanding by the new horse racing board or authority, Horse racing Ireland, that the equation must be changed. I ask the Minister to encourage the powers that be in the new set-up to have sufficient races for that type of animal because everybody deserves some small return from racing.

I hope the new structure will be successful in running better promotions to encourage more and more people to go racing. However, if one looks at the figures and takes into account that people now have much more leisure time and more money to spend on their leisure than they had ten or 15 years ago, the increase in the attendance at Irish racing is particularly disappointing. It is in marked contrast to what is happening at greyhound racing where huge crowds are thronging to Shelbourne Park and Harold's Cross in Dublin. As the Minister and I know, the new track in Cork in its short few months of operation has been a tremendous success with phenomenal crowds attending. It is happening because of the marketing being done to encourage people and it is bringing people to greyhound racing who may not previously have attended a meeting. We must do the same for horse racing. There is still the false view that it is the tweed coat and bowler hat brigade who go racing. That is a very wrong impression but it needs to be changed from a marketing perspective. All sectors of the horse racing industry need better marketing but if we are to encourage more people to attend racing we must do better marketing.

I welcome the legislation, in particular section 5 allowing the Irish National Stud to involve itself further in syndicates and partnerships, as indicated in the Explanatory Memorandum. Unless the stud does something quite dramatically and quickly concerning the profile of the stallions it stands, and in particular a move towards national hunt stallions, it will be in genuine trouble from a breeding perspective. I do not want it simply to be the home of the Japanese gardens and of Danoli. If it is to return even near centre stage in the breeding sector it should examine its stallion policy. I noted that the total amount which it may borrow will increase from £5 million to £20 million. That is welcome but when one recognises what it must compete against and the financial worth of the stud farms against which the National Stud is trying to compete for the purchase of stallions, it faces an enormous task. It would be a pity if the Irish National Stud could not thrive and prosper but the direction it will take must be thoroughly examined. I read through its report and there was no particular view of what the Irish National Stud wished to be over the next ten to 20 years. Perhaps a new mission statement from the Irish National Stud is required which I would like to see as soon as possible.

I welcome the legislation and the opportunity it has given us to comment on the industry at large. I am sure the Minister will pass on my comments to the appropriate people on the Irish National Stud board. I look forward to the day when once again the Irish National Stud will be seen to play a more central role in breeding Irish horses.

I welcome this legislation. They say that to maintain thoroughbred horse stock is the sport of kings. The thoroughbred end of the industry is a luxury business. I welcome this amendment Bill. The thoroughbred and non-throughbred sectors in recent years have continued to play a very important role. However, the non-thoroughbred aspect of the industry has been somewhat overlooked. As we move into the 21st century it is gratifying for all concerned to observe the international standing of the Irish bloodstock breeding industry, but I would like us to consider the non-thoroughbred sector.

It was disappointing that our showjumping team did not compete at the Olympics. Ireland has been internationally recognised for a number of decades as a producer of quality thoroughbred animals. It was disappointing that our showjumping team, which has been very successful on the international circuit this year and has done the country proud, could not compete at the Olympics.

I read with interest the comments of Dr. Noel Cawley about the need for a register of quality bred mares. It is important that such a register should be kept in respect of non-thoroughbred animals. Ireland has always been blessed with people who, with little or no support, have bred good quality showjumpers. Bord na gCapall, which has since been replaced, did extraordinary work in the past. Ireland's international reputation in this area relates to the cross-breeding of the Irish draught stallion with the three-quarter bred which has produced very good showjumpers.

If one attends the annual show at Mill Street or the Horse Show at the RDS, one will see the Young Irelander competition, which is sponsored by the Bank of Ireland, for four year olds and be amazed by the number of spectators who come to watch it. Noel C. Duggan has done an extra ordinary job in terms of promoting the non-thoroughbred industry. The thoroughbred industry is elitist and it is costly to become involved in it. Previous speakers referred to syndicates owning horses but, in reality, syndicates rarely make money from owning thoroughbred animals. It is nice to be associated with a winner and I had the option of becoming involved in a syndicate.

I am the owner of a showjumper that won the league qualifier at the RDS this year and I know how costly it is to keep a horse in a stable and how difficult it is to make money. The prize money in showjumping does not compare to that on offer in horseracing. Those involved in showjumping really believe in the industry and love horses. When one owns a horse it prevents one from betting on that horse because the costs involved are so great.

The National Stud has done invaluable work over the years. I welcome the fact that the Bill will increase the equity invested in the National Stud. However, the Minister must open up the industry because, to an extent, it is a closed shop at present. A friend of mine recently paid £10,000 for a foal which he then had to transport to his property in the country. There are high risks involved in this business, particularly when one considers what might happen to one's investment between the market and one's home. New people becoming involved in the industry often over-stretch themselves financially when they buy horses and this often encourages them to leave the industry, never to return.

It is important to ensure that those involved in the industry are more open about how it operates. I accept these people are professionals and have vested interests but they should not keep the secrets of the trade to themselves. At present, there is closed shop among trainers and owners. There is nothing to prevent a person buying a yearling at Goff's. It is like buying a lottery ticket; one can either be lucky or completely unlucky. This is a major industry. People should be encouraged to enter it and made aware of the tax write-offs they can get on the fees they pay for stallions, etc.

In every town or village throughout the country one will usually come across a breeder who owns a good quality brood mare. We must ensure that these people are given stud fee allowances to enable them to produce high quality jumpers. Thoroughbreds are only raised in a certain number of counties but in every constituency showjumpers, which can compete on the international stage and generate prize money, can be bred. It must be remembered that buyers from many foreign countries come to Ireland in search of quality jumpers.

Showjumping is a major sport. The majority of the debate to date has revolved around thoroughbreds that are reared to race. I accept that this is a huge industry but little or no recognition has been given, by successive Ministers, to those who are prepared to breed good colt foals or colt fillies. Those people are given very little assistance. Bord na gCapall tried to do so for many years but, in certain ways, it failed in that regard.

Horse shows held in our towns and counties play a major role. Noel C. Duggan and other entrepreneurs have done great work in this regard and they must be saluted because it is very difficult to maintain voluntary support for county shows. There is very little funding on offer from the Department or the Irish Shows Association for these shows, with the exception of the grants given to a few of the qualifiers at the RDS Horse Show. In addition, not much is done to encourage sponsors to remain in the sport. We must safeguard sponsors and provide them with a sense of security with regard to the competitions they sponsor. I refer in particular to the Young Irelander competition which identifies the three year old horse with the best potential to become a jumper as a four year old. The Minister must take steps to encourage those involved in this hugely important industry.

It is disappointing that our international showjumping team did not compete at the Olympics because of the quarantine on horses. However, we should have a second panel of showjumpers which could be taken off the circuit two months before the Olympics and the team should be given State funding. These measures will allow them to compete.

I accept that I am wandering somewhat from the substance of the Bill. However, when he introduced the Bill the Minister said:

I am pleased to introduce the National Stud (Amendment) Bill, 2000. The horse industry, thoroughbred and non-thoroughbred, has over the last few years continued to play a very important role and is now about to undergo significant change.

What plans does he have in respect of introducing significant changes in the non-thoroughbred industry? There has been very little discussion about this industry. I have a major interest in the non-thoroughbred industry because ordinary people can become involved in it. The thoroughbred industry is a different matter and while it is not particularly elitist, it is confined to a certain class of people.

I would like the Minister to indicate his plans for the non-thoroughbred industry. Does he intend, for example, to put in place a register of the best mares in the country? The Irish draught stallion has been identified across the world as the animal most likely to produce the quality showjumper. What are the Minister's plans for Irish draught stallions?

Grants, premiums and subsidies are given to people who keep quality brood mares. However, there is a need to encourage new people to enter the market. Perhaps this could be done as part of the development of alternative farming. Ireland has a reputation in the horse industry but we should consider where our alternatives lie.

There is a great interest among punters in the thoroughbred industry. There are many race tracks, such as the Curragh, on the east coast. However, consideration must be given to racetracks in other areas. It is not possible for everyone from the north west to travel to the Curragh. If the Minister is serious about the industry he must provide funding for the development of Sligo race course, which depends for its survival on the huge commitment of the manager and volunteers. A meeting at this course attracts approximately 5,000 people and I am disappointed at the lack of State investment in it. People love to go to the races and it is important that tracks are easily accessible. The track in Sligo needs investment for drainage works, etc. and private investment could be encouraged by giving tax concessions to people who invest in local race courses. Sligo is a Border county and, in the context of cross-Border development, it is important that people who live in the North are attracted to the north west for race meetings. It is also important for the industry that the owners of quality stock are encouraged to travel to provincial race tracks for meetings. Deputy Bradford divided race horses into formula one and formula two. There is a market for both types of horse and it is important that owners are encouraged to travel to meetings.

I welcome the Bill and the debate on the horse industry. The Bill covers all horses – bloodstock, cobs, ponies, sixteen hands and thoroughbreds. Many parents send their children to equestrian centres which not only give training in horse riding but also bring them to weekend shows. The Minister has a role to play in ensuring the continuity of county shows which are under threat. These shows are run by dedicated committees who get little or no support and find it difficult to secure sponsorship. It is important that some concession is given to the sponsors of county shows.

The thoroughbred breeding course in the National Stud, which is in its 28th year, remains the best known and most prestigious equestrian training programme. The National Stud is doing a very good job but this course is effectively a closed shop as there are only 23 places available on it. If one wants to secure a place on the course it depends on who one knows. If one is friendly with a well known trainer or one of the inner circle then one is guaranteed a place. This is wrong. The course should be opened up so that people from disadvantaged areas who have an ability are given an opportunity to secure a place. There are many successful schools which have stables attached to them and the Minister should allow them to run courses rather than confine it to the national stud. A stable owner who has the necessary qualifications should be allowed to take in apprentices. There is huge emphasis on the thoroughbred industry, but it is also important to remember that farriers are very skilled and that there are many opportunities in the non-thoroughbred area.

It is important to recognise that the National Stud made a profit of £2 million and has done a good job. I welcome the provision of funding to enable it to buy quality stallions. The Minister said the industry has played an important role over many years and is about to undergo significant change. I am anxious to hear his plans for the non-thoroughbred industry. His comments will be listened to attentively by those who are interested in the role he envisages for the Irish Show Jumping Association for the 21st century.

I have been chairman of the Ballymote track for many years and a huge number of people from the North travel to our show. People love the industry and it has no political divides. There is no excuse for our failure to send a team to this year's Olympics. If the elite show jumpers do not want to compete in the Olympics as they will lose money by not competing in the European circuit, there should be a second squad to take their place. The Department should allocate funding to the team which competes and promotes the people from west Cork and south Sligo who breed quality show jumpers. I love thoroughbreds but it is a sport of kings, and I do not qualify in that respect. My father believes that owning horses stops people from betting on them. Very few people make money on horses. It is a rich man's hobby and an alternative to golf. If we want to encourage small breeders to become involved in the industry they must be given assistance.

I wish to share my time with Deputy Carey.

Carlow-Kilkenny): Is that agreed? Agreed.

I welcome this important debate. I was not aware there were so many horse owners within our ranks. I am glad to rub shoulders with them. I am not a horse owner but I come from a farming background and have a tremendous interest in the industry.

I agree with the comments made by Deputy Perry. I was interested to hear Deputy McGahon, who is well informed on this issue, say that the top stables are creaming all the prize money and that there is a downside to this. I agree that if one wants to attract good horses the prize money must be high. However a figure in excess of £250,000 seems very high. The owner, trainer and jockey are happy when their horse wins, but what happens to the owners of horses which do not win? They also have costs and there should be some system where they can share in the prize money. If we want to support the industry in a fair manner recognition should be given to the contribution made by these owners and trainers. I would not describe it as a golden circle, but a small number of owners and trainers win the top prize money at meetings, leaving a pittance for everyone else.

The National Stud has done great work in making top stallions available to small breeders who could not otherwise afford to buy them. Our bloodstock, both thoroughbred and non-thoroughbred, has a world-wide market. Our best horses would have been exported if the National Stud had not been able to enter the domestic and international markets to purchase quality stallions and make them available to small breeders. The vast number of small breeders form the backbone of the industry. Top flight trainers are supported by syndicates which own horses and place them with them. Small farmers and owners have an interest and hope that one day they might be lucky enough to breed a good horse, as a former Member of this House has done, and salvage their outgoings.

I salute the Cavan Equestrian Centre, which was set up by the Clarke family and is one of the finest in Ireland. It was felt that it would never succeed because there was not an equine tradition in Cavan, but it is an outstanding success. Top showjumping events are held there almost every weekend and showjumpers travel to the centre from both sides of the Border. They participate in marvellous sponsored events which offer good prize money. However, there are huge costs involved and the Clarke family is not receiving the support it deserves. The family has had a massive input into the region by building such an arena which has benefited breeders, North and South.

I question the thinking within the Department in regard to the grant aid available for stabling and the conditions which apply. I have come across a case, about which I have made various representations, of young people with an interest in horses and ponies who set about building new stables. They drew up plans and were approved for grant aid. They upgraded the stables and blended them in with their dormer bungalow. This facelift also ensured the stables were environmentally friendly. However, they were denied the grant after they made those changes and upgraded the appearance of the stables. I have made various representations but nobody listens. The couple were told they did not adhere to the specifications as laid down. They improved the specifications but were denied their grant. If such thinking is applied throughout the Department, we will get nowhere.

I also support earlier comments regarding breeders and showjumpers. They should be provided with grant aid or support because it is a costly business. However, there is a huge knock-on benefit in terms of employment as people are required for horse transportation and in equestrian centres. There is a spin-off which emanates in the first instance on farms owned by small breeders and farmers. They have the extra finance that is necessary but find that it impinges on other household activities and support should be provided to such individuals.

As costs rise, inflation takes its toll and disposable cash is not as plentiful, people will give up little sidelines, such as this, in which they are involved. That is sad because there is a great tra dition of breeding in Ireland. There is a major nucleus of top quality breeding stock which is costly to maintain but we do not want all the stock to be purchased by wealthier people with more disposable income. The small householder, farmer or business man who has land on which he would like to keep a few ponies should be supported. He is the backbone of the industry.

I acknowledge the great work that is being done but I wanted to highlight one or two issues which need to be addressed. I also acknowledge the marvellous work of the national stud. It is an eye opener to those involved in other sectors of the agriculture industry to learn how the stud is run and conducts its business.

I would like to refer to those who work on stud farms. I ask the Minister or the Minister for Education and Science to provide training in third level institutions for such individuals so that people can recognise the valuable role they could play in this field and that it can be rewarding. There is a simplistic view of how stud farms are run, the hygiene regulations that must be observed and the organisation that is involved. I visited a number of stud farms over the past year and even large stud farms have difficulty attracting young Irish men and women to take up employment and pick up the vital knowledge necessary to maintain a successful industry.

As soon as people have worked on a stud farm for a year or two they leave to work in racing stables. The thrill and excitement of the racing game attracts them. If a third level course on stud farming was provided in an institute of technology – a university degree is not necessary – more people would want to enter the industry because it would be more attractive if a proper qualification was offered. Some stud managers are interested in this and I hope the National Stud will take the lead and make representations to third level institutions to promote this sector of the agriculture industry.

I wish the Minister well in his work with the National Stud. There is no political divide in this matter. There are good and bad horses and I am in a syndicate which owns a successful horse. We are lucky but we have also had bad horses. That is the name of the game. I enjoy racing, as does the Minister.

I thank the Deputies who contributed to the debate for their supportive and positive comments on the industry. They transmitted their liking and passion for the industry. There is not a Parliament in the world which would have such an animated debate on the horse, and long may that continue. The National Stud is thought of very highly across the board and this is as it should be. It has served the State, thoroughbred breeders, the horse industry in general and the tourism sector in an excellent fashion.

Deputy Dukes has particular knowledge of and keen interest in the stud. He made some positive comments on the stud and mentioned how well it is regarded in Kildare. He was entirely supportive of and constructive in regard to the stud. He singled out the management, staff and board there for their professional contribution to the stud over the years.

One of the issues raised by Deputies Dukes, Power and others related to section 2(3) which deals with the vesting of the National Stud farm in the stud company. I do not agree that these provisions would necessarily create a problem for the stud. That was not the intention. Deputies Dukes and Power referred to the provision whereby if the Minister for Agriculture, Food and Rural Development gives consent to the sale of vested land then effectively the Minister would, with the consent of his colleague in the Department of Finance, decide how the proceeds would be used. In my address to the House last week, I said in reference to section 2(3)(a) that, if the revenues from such a sale were relatively small or reasonably in proportion to the stud's needs generally, then the stud could use the entire proceeds as it saw fit. This would include any requirement of the stud to purchase other lands at a potentially very high price.

The possibility mentioned in section 2(3)(c) of some of or all of the funds going to the Exchequer is only envisaged as being required in the exceptional circumstances where rezoned land may be sold at very high values and could be replaced by suitable agricultural land leaving a potentially huge excess way beyond the stud's commercial or other needs. In such a case, the excess could be used for other purposes to the benefit of the State.

However, being a very considerate person who is always prepared to listen to a reasonable proposition, and given that a good case was forcefully made by the two Kildare Deputies in particular, I agree that these provisions could be used otherwise. I have always placed great trust in the board of the stud company. The board is appointed by the Government and such boards must be given the flexibility to do their job and should not have their hands tied. I have a high regard for the current and previous chairmen and members of the board of the Irish National Stud. I have sought to ensure they have the necessary powers, freedom and resources to do a first rate job in developing the stud in the context of the widest possible interpretation of their role and to the greatest extent feasible.

Therefore, and in deference to the force of arguments made by my colleagues, I will reconsider the detailed provisions of section 2 and have already asked my officials to examine how this section could be redrafted to allow the stud company the greatest amount of flexibility while ensuring the protection of the National Stud farm as an important State asset. I hope to bring forward on Committee Stage a suitable amendment to take into account the suggestions made. I am satisfied we can provide a solution acceptable to all.

A number of Deputies, including Deputies Dukes and Power, raised the issue of the foal levy. An enabling provision allowing for its introduction was provided for in the Horse and Greyhound Racing (Betting Charges and Levies) Act, 1999. The actual rates of levy and other implementing details were introduced by the IHA with my consent by means of regulations. I am aware of difficulties which have arisen in the first year of operation, especially for smaller breeders. I understand the IHA is in the process of setting up a committee to review the regulations and to include people from the Irish Thoroughbred Breeders Association, the IFA and other interested parties from the IHA and a senior official from the Department of Agriculture, Food and Rural Development.

I expect that committee to propose improvements and refinements to the application of the levy and I will carefully consider any proposal to amend the regulations, especially where the smaller breeder is concerned. I assure the House that I am most anxious to ensure that any changes to the current levy will take account of the broader industry and the person with two or three mares. The review will be concluded in time for the next breeding season. If amendment to the primary legislation is required, I will have an opportunity to examine that in the context of planning the new horseracing Bill which I am sure will require amendments to other provisions of the 1999 Act.

A number of specific matters were raised during the course of the debate to which I wish to respond. Deputy Donal Carey was the most recent to raise the provision of training, education and the farriery system. It is amazing there is a shortage of blacksmiths in Ireland. I sought to address this problem a short time ago. When I was growing up there was a blacksmith in every village and they were very skilled craftspeople. In the course of recent visits to other countries, I took some time off to look at an area of my responsibility, namely, the horse industry. The number of people who have done courses in the National Stud and in Kildalton, and such places is amazing. The expertise, professionalism and empathy Irish people have with horses is extraordinary.

However, in the area of farriery the skills are declining and diminishing. I sought to do something about this to provide master farriers who could train younger people. I arranged for that to be done on the farm of the Irish National Stud adjacent to the RACE apprentice school. Planning permission had to be applied for but an objection was lodged immediately and the process was delayed. It went to An Bord Pleanála and I am pleased that that has now been resolved and planning approval has been granted. Unfortunately, at that stage the money set aside for the school under the previous round of Structural Funds had had to go elsewhere but I ensured there was adequate financial provision made in the proposals under the new round of Structural Funds. I hope that, once EU approval is granted, we will be able to proceed with the construction of a master farriery school beside the RACE centre.

As well as that specific area of training and education, I will ensure in the new Bill setting up Horse Racing Ireland that attention will be given to proper education and training structures for the industry for the future. As Deputy Donal Carey said, there are stud farms where the highest level of expertise is required. Stable lads deal with high class thoroughbreds who are so precious one could hardly look sideways at them. A tremendous amount of expertise is required. There are training courses in the Irish National Stud for the thoroughbred side and in Kildalton for the non-thoroughbred and a new equine faculty has been established in the University of Limerick. It is a matter of pulling it together and putting a proper structure in place. That is essential and I am committed to that.

Deputies Wall and Power and others referred to the position of stable lads. When people go racing, they arrive during the early part of the race meeting at least and, it is hoped, before the first race. Everything is laid on for them. The horses are provided and the facilities have been improved in many tracks. They sit down to a comfortable meeting and have a bit of punting to raise the level of excitement. The jockeys get on board and, if it is national hunt, they endanger their lives every time they go out because horrific accidents can occur. We hardly ever take into account the position of the other people who facilitate all this happening.

The poor lads at the bottom of the pile are the stable lads. They must set out early in the morning for the racecourse. When everything is over, they must bring the horses back, hopefully in one piece. If it is a festival meeting, they must be back again the following day and return home the following night. I have the greatest understanding of their position. People in the industry must comply with the minimum wage. However, the conditions in some of the tracks are such that stable lads must change in a horse box. If they are looking for a bite to eat or a bowl of soup, they are told: "Well look, the restaurant is booked out at the moment by some of the salami sandwich brigade". That is not fair and it is not good enough. I have written to every single racecourse about it and I will not be satisfied until that changes. I am sure everyone in the House has the same concern that people in the industry should be treated well and not shabbily, as they have been up to now. Stable lads in particular are doing a marvellous job and their lot will be substantially improved.

Every speaker referred to the new structure for the thoroughbred industry. With the substantial improvement in funding, we will seek to ensure the additional moneys are broadly spent and applied. Yesterday, when the IHA made its first funding announcement, I was pleased that it applied to the national hunt sector where the minimum prize money for grade one races will be £50,000, and up to £10,000 for ordinary races. There will be sponsorship on top of that. It is important for racecourse managements to obtain sponsorship. Although it is fun, keeping a race horse is a costly business. In flat racing, as Deputy Bradford said, if one spends £5,000 or £10,000 and in the first race one's horse is up against a £1 million or £2 million yearling, one does not have a chance. The statistics show that 17 out of 20 grade one flat races are won by horses belonging to two or three well-known owners. The ordinary person has no real chance, except in very exceptional circumstances and, so, the crowd will not be there for group one races and classics at the Curragh and elsewhere. They will be there for national hunt racing, however, which is the life and soul of the industry.

Deputy Perry mentioned the non-thoroughbred horse industry and even though it is not part of the National Stud or thoroughbred industries, nonetheless, the two industries are very closely related. The Deputy made some important points. I looked at this industry in the early 1990s, and in 1993 I established the Irish Horse Board under the chairmanship of Dr. Noel Cawley. Mr. Dermot Ryan from the Department provided a secretariat, and we also provided the horse register from the Department. Much support was provided from Structural Funds, particularly from 1994 to 1999. Some exciting new schemes are envisaged in the new Structural Funds for non-thoroughbreds. I agree that people are interested in the sector, from ponies up to eventers and dressage, cross-country and show jumping. It is fantastic to see Irish horses and riders performing so creditably. For example, we won the Nation's Cup event this year by a mile, and we won ten such cups throughout Europe, as well as coming out with flying colours in Calgary, Canada. Our riders do a marvellous job for Ireland in flying the flag at overseas events in the teeth of strong competition.

Although we did not have an official team in the Olympic Games in Sydney, a neighbour of mine, Patricia Donegan from Bandon, gave a professional performance in the cross-country event there on her horse Don't Step Back. Well done to her. At least four of the horses competing in the Olympic cross-country events were bred in west Cork, including Cutam Mad, ridden by Mr. David O'Connor of the United States. A few other horses were bred in other parts of the country. In many ways we flew the flag for non-thoroughbreds.

The Irish National Stud has helped to promote and sustain the image of the Irish thoroughbred racehorse as well as Irish racing, generally, on the world stage. It has achieved this by adopting a very pro-active and professional approach both at board and executive management level, using a high degree of acquired skills and an effective process of strategic planning. During the debate a request was made for a mission statement and I will bring that to the attention of the board and management.

Deputy Bradford, who has an intimate knowledge of the industry, raised the stud's position relating to national hunt racing. The National Stud has a world-wide reputation, with world class stallions such as Indian Ridge, Desert Prince and Ashkalani. The stud also has national hunt stallions, but it took a decision a couple of years ago that it would be in the best interests of the national hunt industry to have those stallions located outside Kildare since most national hunt racing is based outside that county. For example, one of the stallions, Yashan, is with Mr. Dinny Vaughan, down in Deputy Bradford's neck of the woods in Cork. Another very good national hunt stallion, Broken Hearted, is owned by the National Stud also, but is farmed out, as is Tremblant, in the west. This year, the stud purchased a brand new and very well bred national hunt stallion, Rudimentary, which is with the Pims in Anngrove Stud. The national hunt stallions, therefore, are widely distributed for the benefit of the national hunt people. I will seek to ensure that the National Stud retains that capacity, capability and facility for national hunt breeders. It is a good thing that they should distribute them around the country.

The Aga Khan has been lauded for his loyalty to Ireland as a base for his equestrian operations. His grandfather the Aga Khan, followed by the Ally Khan and now the present Aga Khan have had connections here since the 1920s. Last year, Daylami was horse of the year and retired here to stand at stud when he could have been retired to any country in the world. This year, Sinndar, uniquely won the Epsom and Irish Derbys and the Prix de l'Arc de Triomphe, before retiring to stand at stud here. It is tremendous to see world class horses, such as Giant's Causeway and Montjeu, being retired to Coolmore Stud in Tipperary. Mr. Liam Cashman's Breeder's Cup winner, Barathea, which is a horse of outstanding international competence, has retired to Ireland, also. We have outstanding international stud farms and I compliment their managers and operators.

In the course of the debate on the Bill, a question was raised concerning how the Turf Club would fit into the new body, and whether it had been unfairly treated in the debate over the establishment of the new structure. The Turf Club has been around for centuries and is the integrity base for the horse racing industry. That was accepted and acknowledged during the negotiations, so much so that the club is being given five members on the new body. That is a far greater number than any other interest, including owners, trainers and bookies. The Government of the day has only one member on the board. The pivotal position of the Turf Club was, therefore, taken into account.

The question of punters having a representa tive on the board was mentioned. It was felt that 17 members was too unwieldy a number on the old IHA, and that some effort should be made to have a more compact board. There will be a facility for punters' representation, however, and I will ensure that consultative sub-boards will be provided in the new authority, so they will have adequate representation. It is more important, however, to have a representative supporters club or board at each race track.

I was delighted that Deputy McGahon, a great supporter of the industry, was generous enough to say that Mallow racecourse was a success. It is a superb facility which is well patronised. It has its own board. If it is not representative, it should be broadened. The various supporters clubs in Galway and Listowel, for example, do a fabulous job and their views are taken into account.

The contributions made today were positive and constructive.

It is unfortunate that the Kildare bypass has to cut across part of the lands of the National Stud. We cannot, however, hold back improvements in roadways and realignment. Anyone travelling through Kildare will have first-hand experience of the difficulties in the area at peak times and will accept that a bypass is needed. Commercial realities of the day and the essential requirements of the national road network must be taken into account. Thankfully, the route chosen will have a small impact on the stud. For example, only 50 of the overall total of 950 acres will be cut off from the main farm. Preliminary works on the bypass have commenced. I understand the road will take about three years to complete. Every effort is being made to ensure disruption to the stud during this period is kept to a minimum.

The National Stud is only a very small part of the overall horse racing industry. I was delighted at the extremely positive reception given to the proposals which my colleague, the Minister for Finance, Deputy McCreevy, and I have been promoting in recent times on the restructuring of the organisation and funding of the horse racing industry which will mean substantial change, particularly for those employed by or involved with the IHA, the Turf Club and the Association of Irish Racecourses. While change is difficult, it is necessary.

I am satisfied that in this case it will result in substantial long-term benefits for all those participating in the industry, particularly those who depend on it for their livelihood, that is, stable staff, jockeys, trainers, owners and businesses providing essential services for the sector. I am looking forward to introducing the necessary legislation amending the relevant 1994 and 1999 Acts in this area in the coming months. I am satisfied that the overall outcome will be good for Irish racing and facilitate its development.

In this context, we are providing a brand new racecourse at Patrickswell, County Limerick, about which I am sure my colleague, the Minister of State, Deputy O'Dea, is very pleased.

Delighted.

He has no interest; he has no time.

Surely, he will be able to take a couple of hours off.

I will see the Deputy there.

I am satisfied that the overall outcome will be good for Irish racing and facilitate the development to its full potential of an important industry in which I and the various Deputies from all parties who contributed to the debate have a strong interest and for which they have a passion. We must secure its future at this opportune time. I am totally committed to this.

I am equally committed to the National Stud. The various provisions of the Bill, most notably the proposed increase in share capital and borrowing powers of the company and the proposal that will enable the Minister of the day to vest all or part of the original stud lands in the National Stud company, are aimed at securing its future and ensuring its potential is fully realised and the consequential benefits for Irish breeders and the status internationally of the Irish thoroughbred and Irish tourism are maximised.

I look forward to a useful debate on Committee Stage when I will bring forward an amendment to facilitate the concerns of Deputies Dukes and Power. I will welcome and examine closely any proposal for an improvement of the Bill. I commend the Bill to the House.

Question put and agreed to.
Barr
Roinn