Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Wednesday, 7 Feb 2001

Vol. 530 No. 1

Priority Questions. - Garda Investigations.

Brendan Howlin

Ceist:

26 Mr. Howlin asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the steps that have been taken since he received the report of a senior Garda official (details supplied) in July 2000 into allegations of corruption and malpractice involving members of the Garda Síochána in County Donegal; if he will bring the report before the Oireachtas Committee on Justice, Equality, Defence and Women's Rights; if he will establish a sworn inquiry into the allegations; the steps he will take to re-establish public confidence in the Garda in the area having regard to the serious public concern at the allegations; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [3181/01]

I have dealt with this matter in some detail on a number of occasions in this House. I have at all times given as much information as possible and welcome this opportunity to update the House.

I am constrained by a number of factors and I ask Deputies to be equally mindful of those factors. This is a complex matter and a number of issues have yet to be resolved. A number of civil actions have been initiated, the Director of Public Prosecutions is examining the question of criminal proceedings in a number of cases, complaints have been lodged with the Garda Síochána Complaints Board and the question of possible disciplinary action against members of the Garda Síochána may have to be considered by the Commissioner. All these factors place an onus on us to be careful in what we say about the matter in hand. It is essential that the truth is determined and that, in this process, the rights of all concerned are upheld and vindicated. We must be careful not to prejudice any proceedings which may arise from the matter in question.

The Deputy asked what steps have been taken since I received the report of a senior Garda officer into allegations of corruption and malpractice involving members of the Garda in County Donegal. On completion of the investigation by the Assistant Commissioner, a file in the matter was forwarded to the Director of Public Prosecutions. The directions of the director are awaited. Deputies will be aware that the question of criminal prosecutions is a matter solely for the Director of Public Prosecutions and I, as Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, have no role in the prosecution of individuals for criminal offences. It would be totally inappropriate for me to make any comment in this regard and, accordingly, I do not propose to do so.

In addition to the investigation carried out by Assistant Commissioner Carthy, two other investigations relating to Donegal were initiated. One, conducted by Assistant Commissioner Murphy, relates to matters raised by the then Opposition spokesmen on justice and the other investigation, conducted by a chief superintendent, relates to a matter raised by a member of the Garda Síochána in Donegal concerning the original investigation. The results of these investigations are still awaited.

The Deputy also asked if I will bring the report before an Oireachtas committee and if I will establish a sworn inquiry into the allegations. I want to see the truth determined. I also want to see public confidence in the Garda restored, in so far as it has been adversely affected by the matter. The question is how we can best achieve this in an open and transparent way.

Obviously, it is a matter of great concern that individual members of the Garda Síochána might have been implicated in wrongdoing. It is essential for the reputation of the force that any alleged wrongdoing by members is investigated thoroughly and, if well founded, appropriate disciplinary or criminal proceedings should be initiated. I have indicated the position in these matters.

Additional InformationThe Commissioner has already taken initial steps to address the question of public confidence in policing in Donegal by the transfer of a number of personnel. In this the Commissioner has my full support. While it is the case, therefore, that various steps have been and are being taken to deal with different aspects of this matter – and it is also the case that these inquiries and so on must be allowed to run their course – I can understand the point that the completion of individual inquiries could still leave a concern that the bigger picture has not been addressed or that it has not been addressed in a way that deals with the issue of public confidence.

The nature of the Donegal case is such that it requires some form of comprehensive review that will examine and report on all aspects of the matter. Deputies will be aware from previous statements I have made in the House that I accept the current arrangements for dealing with complaints against the Garda Síochána are not satisfactory and need to be revised. I have also indicated that I intend to bring forward appropriate proposals to Government to amend the Garda Síochána (Complaints) Act, 1986. In that context I am looking at the possible establishment of new processes which would not only deal with complaints against individual members but would address wider issues of the type raised by the case in Donegal.

I intend to bring to Government in the near future proposals for amendments to the existing Garda Síochána (Complaints) Act and suggestions to deal with wider issues of the kind to which I have already referred. When the Government has considered the matter, I will make a further statement. I cannot say, at this stage, whether a public sworn inquiry by way of a tribunal would represent the best way of addressing what I have described as the "bigger picture" issues in this case. It is an option which I have not ruled out, but neither am I convinced that it would necessarily be the best way of dealing with the matter. At this stage, I have an open mind on the matter.

Is the Minister aware that counsel for the Director of Public Prosecutions has publicly stated that no prosecutions will ensue on foot of the investigations into Garda activity involving the McBrearty family in Donegal? A report in the Irish Examiner on 2 January this year indicated that the Minister is reported to be preparing an initiative to bring to Government to establish a sworn inquiry into allegations of Garda corruption in Donegal. What is the status of that report? What preparations, if any, has the Minister made in that regard?

Will the Minister accept that there is an onus on him to ensure absolute confidence in the operations of An Garda Síochána? An inordinate amount of time has passed since the completion of this report and the report itself took almost two years. When can we expect the other two reports by the chief superintendent and Assistant Commissioner Murphy, neither of which one would have expected to have taken so long to complete? Has the Minister been in touch with any of the individuals concerned and has he expressed any concern about the inordinate amount of time that has passed which undermines public confidence in policing?

Deputy Howlin raised a number of issues. I have spoken to the Garda Commissioner about the other two reports. I understand at least one of the reports will be with me shortly and the other is well advanced. The main report, which is in the possession of the Director of Public Prosecutions for decision, is one which I would be unwise to publish in the absence of a decision being made by the director in relation to what prosecutions, if any, he will take. The Director of Public Prosecutions is independent in the exercise of his role. I may not interfere with him and I do not have any role in his decision making process. In those circumstances, I cannot seek to expedite his decision either.

I agree it is my function to ensure that the full est confidence is reposed in the Garda Síochána by the public. In that respect, the Garda Commissioner has transferred some members of the force. I appreciate that this would not appear sufficient on a cursory reading of what appears to have taken place. Again, however, I cannot prejudge any of these matters until the Director of Public Prosecutions makes his decision. Even then, it would be a matter for the courts if there are prosecutions.

We must move to Question No. 27.

May I ask a second supplementary?

We are over time on the question. The Deputy took a long time to ask the first supplementary.

I will be brief.

With regard to the other two reports, will they come to the Minister first or to the Garda Commissioner? The Carthy report was with the Garda Commissioner for a number of days before being sent to the Minister and to the DPP who received it on the same day. Will the Minister see the two reports and, if so, when?

I would expect the Garda Commissioner to see the reports first and subsequently transmit them to me. A formal decision has not yet been made on the question of whether a public inquiry will be held.

Barr
Roinn