Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Thursday, 17 May 2001

Vol. 536 No. 4

Ceisteanna – Questions. Priority Questions. - Office of the Revenue Commissioners.

Jim Mitchell

Ceist:

3 Mr. J. Mitchell asked the Minister for Finance his views on the recommendation of the DIRT inquiry that the board of the Revenue Commissioners be reorganised so that there would be three executive and three non-executive commissioners, and that the chairman would be appointed from the non-executive commissioners; when the Revenue Bill to give effect to the proposed major reorganisation of the Revenue Commissioners will be introduced; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [14307/01]

As the Deputy is aware, a steering group from my Department, which included two members from the private sector, carried out a review of the Office of the Revenue Commissioners. It produced a report containing 48 recommendations involving corporate governance arrangements, accountability, Revenue's core business, organisation structures and support services, and management procedures. In particular, the review recommends the establishment of a new governing board of Revenue to replace the current statutory board, to comprise the current Revenue chairman, the other two Revenue commissioners and three independent non-executive directors, one of whom should be vice-chairman.

The final report of the Committee of Public Accounts parliamentary inquiry into DIRT, which was published on 3 April last, considered the report of the steering group and recommended that the board of the Revenue Commissioners should have three executive and three non-executive members but that one of the non-executive members should be chairman. I am giving careful consideration to the recommendations in these two reports and as soon as I have completed my consideration of the issues involved, I will bring proposals to Government.

The Revenue Commissioners advise me that they have already taken a number of measures to implement the steering group's recommendations in areas which do not require Government decisions. These recommendations are concerned with the extensive changes in the way Revenue is internally organised below board level and take account of Revenue's proposals following a root and branch review undertaken by them. My Department has sanctioned an extra 31 posts to provide the resources necessary to advance this work.

Will there be a new Revenue Bill and if so when will it be introduced?

Implementing either the new governance recommended by the steering group or the one recommended by the Committee of Public Accounts would require new legislation. As Deputy Mitchell knows from his committee work, there may be some cross-over regarding recommendations from the Moriarty tribunal. That tribunal was asked to make recommendations about governance and we may have to wait until we have its report. In the future we will bring a memorandum to Cabinet where it will be discussed and a Revenue Bill would then be required.

When does the Minister expect to bring the memorandum to Government?

I had hoped that I would receive the Moriarty tribunal recommendations shortly after the report from the sub-committee of the Committee of Public Accounts. I will wait a little longer to see if that is going to happen and bring the memorandum to Cabinet with the Bill to follow, I hope, later in the year.

Barr
Roinn