Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Wednesday, 4 Jul 2001

Vol. 540 No. 2

Written Answers. - Traveller Accommodation.

Chris Flood

Ceist:

198 Mr. Flood asked the Minister for the Environment and Local Government his views on the slow progress in the provision of new accommodation for travellers; if his attention has been drawn to the fact that in the first progress report of the committee to monitor and co-ordinate the implementation of the recommendations of the task force on the travelling community, it was stated that progress in the provision of new accommodation has been slow between 1998 and 1999; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [20477/01]

One of the principal requirements of the Housing (Traveller Accommodation) Act, 1998, is the preparation, adoption and implementation by local authorities of five year programmes to accelerate the provision of accommodation for Travellers camped on unofficial sites or on the roadside. All relevant local authorities have adopted and are currently implementing their respective programmes, involving the provision of some 3,785 units of accommodation over the five year period from 2000 to 2004. The increased provision of accommodation resulting from the implementation of the programmes will address the needs of those Traveller families seeking accommodation and ensure that all authorities play their part in the provision of Traveller accommodation.

In the period between the publication of the report of the task force in July 1995 to the end of 2000, some 789 units of Traveller accommodation were provided, comprised of 319 units of Traveller specific accommodation and 470 units of standard local authority housing. At the end of 2000, work on the provision of 25 new halting site bays was in progress and 27 bays were being refurbished; there were 67 new group houses in progress with a further 22 being refurbished.

In the current year to date, work on the provision of 38 new bays, the refurbishment of three existing bays and 28 new group houses has commenced and my Department has sanctioned the provision of 62 new group houses and refurbishment of 28 halting site bays. The annual count of Traveller families undertaken in November 2000 shows that, compared to 1999, the number of families on the roadside fell, for the first time in a number of years, from 1,207 to 1,093. This decrease, while welcome, is still modest and I will be seeking its significant acceleration over the remaining years of the accommodation programmes.

Chris Flood

Ceist:

199 Mr. Flood asked the Minister for the Environment and Local Government if his attention has been drawn to the fact that of the 38 programmes for Traveller accommodation adopted by 41 local authorities as required under the Housing (Traveller Accommodation) Act, 1998, 37% of programmes have not specifically named new locations or sites, 21% of programmes have not included provision for transient sites, and 34% have not included provision for review; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [20478/01]

The national Traveller accommodation consultative committee, NTACC, recently submitted a report to me on its evaluation of each of the 38 local Traveller accommodation programmes. The report comprised an assessment of the 38 programmes and an evaluation of their compliance with the requirements of section 10 of the Housing (Traveller Accommodation) Act, 1998, and the advice and guidance contained in my Department's memorandum on implementation of the Act, which issued to local authorities in November 1998.

The Act did not require that local authorities identify specific locations or sites for the provision of accommodation under the programme. The NTACC report indicates that, of the 38 programmes adopted, the majority – 26 – identified at least the general areas and locations where the accommodation is to be provided. Several programmes indicated that it was not possible to be site specific at the time of preparation and adoption of the programme for a number of reasons, for example, the unavailability of suitable lands in the authority's ownership, the difficulty in identifying suitable land to purchase and build on, the unavailability of suitable dwellings to purchase in the area required to meet individual family needs and, in some cases, the lack of precise information on individual family requirements. Many programmes indicated that the process of site identification was ongoing at the time of adoption of the programmes.

In relation to transient sites, six of the 38 programmes indicate that it is not proposed to provide such sites on the basis that a need for such a site had not been identified in the assessment of needs which they carried out in accordance with the 1998 Act. Three authorities indicate that transient sites will be provided should a need be identified over the lifetime of the programme. The remaining 29 programmes indicate that transient site(s) will be provided as part of the overall accommodation provision, with some authorities indicating that transient site provision will be pursued in a co-ordinated way with neighbouring authorities.

Section 17 of the 1998 Act requires that a review of each Traveller accommodation programme be carried out at least once every three years. The NTACC's report on the local programmes indicates that seven of the 38 programmes – 18% – do not include proposals for a review of their programmes. However, 19 programmes – 50% – include proposals for a review either annually or after one year of operation, three – 8% – will be reviewed at the statutory time, that is, after three years, and nine – 24% – indicate that elements of the programme will be reviewed on an ongoing basis.

Chris Flood

Ceist:

200 Mr. Flood asked the Minister for the Environment and Local Government if his attention has been drawn to the recent publication by the Irish Travellers Movement entitled A Lost Opportunity, which is a critique of local authority traveller accommodation programmes; if he will arrange to have all recommendations contained in chapter six implemented as soon as possible; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [20479/01]

I welcome the publication of the report, A Lost Opportunity? A Critique of Local Authority Traveller Accommodation Programmes, by the Irish Traveller Movement. This report analyses the local authority five year Traveller accommodation programmes adopted in 2000 under the Housing (Traveller Accommodation) Act, 1998, and makes a number of recommendations directed at my Department, local authorities, Traveller support groups and other organisations.

The national Traveller accommodation consultative committee also carried out a comprehensive and detailed examination and evaluation of these programmes and recently submitted its report to me. In issuing a copy of the NTACC report to all local authorities, the importance of effectively implementing the accommodation programme was stressed as was the need for each authority to address the particular weaknesses identified in their programme. The recommendations of the Irish Traveller movement report are being considered in my Department in so far as they are appropriate to it.

Barr
Roinn