I propose to take Questions Nos. 768, 769, 772, 773, 792, 797 and 805 together.
The person concerned applied for carer's allowance on 23 March 2002. Following the necessary investigations she was awarded carer's allowance at the reduced weekly rate of £18.50 plus £26.40 child dependant allowance with effect from 29 March 2001. This was increased to £76.50 per week plus £24.60 child dependant allowance with effect from 5 April 2001 as a result of improvements which were made in the 2001 budget. She was notified of this decision on 7 August 2001, including a breakdown of how her means were calculated and of her right of appeal. A book of payable orders issued to Castlebar post office payable from 2 August 2001.
On 9 August 2001, her case was referred again to an investigative officer to reassess her means as her spouse had commenced self employment. Following this investigation, she was entitled to carer's allowance of £72.50 per week plus £26.40 child dependant allowance with effect from 27 September 2001. She has been notified of this decision. Arrears of carer's allowance due from 29 March 2001 to 1 August 2001 amounting to £2,194.20 have issued to her.
On average, claims for carer's allowance are processed within 13 weeks. The additional delay in this case arose in obtaining details of the spouse's income from employment and, following his commencement of self-employment, his income from that source.
With regard to the Deputy's request under the Freedom of Information Act, 1997, for files and other information relating to this case, my Department has obtained written authority from the person concerned and also from the third party to whom the information relates in this
case and all records have been released to the Deputy.
At any one time there are a large number of applications for carer's allowance awaiting determination and my Department deals with all applications as quickly and efficiently as possible. Unless there are exceptional circumstances the Department does not give priority to any particular cases as this would mean additional delay for other claimants. Correspondence from the Deputy in relation to individual cases is also dealt with in the normal way. In this particular case I understand also that officials of my Department have been in regular contact with the Deputy's office and that he has been kept fully informed of developments.
Under social welfare legislation, decisions in relation to claims must be made by deciding officers and appeals officers. These officers are statutorily appointed. I have no role in regard to making such decisions.