Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Wednesday, 30 Jan 2002

Vol. 547 No. 1

Adjournment Debate. - Provision of Service Roads.

Tá mé buíochach den Cheann Chomhairle as cead a thabhairt dom an cheist seo a ardú agus cuirim fáilte roimh an Aire Stáit. Tá súil agam go mbeidh sí ag caint leis an Aire féin mar gheall air seo. I refer the Minister to a unique situation in north county Dublin where an ESB plan for 110 kv line is needed between Swords and Balbriggan. The route follows the new M1 motorway reservation. Leaving aside the reports that indicate evidence of strong magnetic fields causing cancer, the issue here is really one of adopting the precautionary principle "where it is possible". If ever it was possible, it is possible in this situation. Already 10% of the line is to be underground at Glassmore on the southern end and the case is very strong for the same to be done at the northern Balbriggan end, from the motorway to the town. The route is already 16 kilometres with 77 pylons proposed. In that regard it is important to look at the Australian experience of such a project where road reservations are seen as service reservations and they include not just roads but also rail and accessible pipes and cabling. Service roads separate maintenance crews from other road users. Given that cyclists and pedestrians or horses are prohibited on motorways, a service road could be a very valuable multi-use investment which could help tourism and provide safe routes for commuters such as cyclists. The Roads Act, 1993, is a large document. It gives total discretion to the National Roads Authority with regard to co-operation with the ESB or other agencies including the local authority on this matter. In the case of Dublin north, Fingal County Council, the local authority, has passed a resolution to seek ducting and undergrounding of this unique roadside 110 kv line. The case is very strong. There are many homes and farms along the line. There is also the problem of the visual intrusion of this line along the main road. Most people are also worried about the electromagnetic pollution that high voltage lines are suspected of causing.

The issue should be examined and the undergrounding done as soon as possible on this optimum stretch, especially in areas of high density housing or planned housing. There is a great deal of housing planned for north county Dublin. The Minister should make an order or amend the 1993 Roads Act to ensure co-operation between agencies. This change is needed anyway as I know that the ESB and the NRA are often at loggerheads over crossing of roads. There is a need to put in place proper co-operative structures to resolve problems. Co-location is accepted as a planning principle in terms of mobile phone masts. Co-location of services should be used to minimise impact and financial liability.

The IFA and the various campaign groups such as Fingal for Undergrounding of Electricity Lines – FUEL – as well as representatives of various political parties are seeking this logical undergrounding option. They have warned that this campaign to place this line underground could become the Wood Quay campaign of Fingal. There is not just the cost of placing these lines underground as opposed to using pylons. The ESB would claim the cost is prohibitive, but I have a newspaper report that shows a link between the use of pylons and leukaemia. It refers to a successful British compensation test case with the potential to have a huge impact on the electricity industry. The Minister should think ahead on this matter and take the opportunity when it is presented to us on a plate, of placing underground a line which will go alongside a major road construction project.

Go raibh maith ag an Teachta as ucht na ceiste seo a ardú. Déarfaidh mé leis an Aire caidé bhí le rá aige. In general, there are many potential advantages associated with the delivery of different infrastructures in a co-ordinated way. Apart from having the scope for reducing the overall financial cost of providing infrastructure, co-ordination can reduce the amount of land taken for services, result in less visual impact on the environment and result in a reduction in the nuisance and other social costs associated with providing infrastructure separately. It is desirable in principle, therefore, that service providers and local authorities should avail of whatever practical opportunities present themselves to co-ordinate the provision of infrastructure. This has been taking place for many years in so far as public roads have been used by service providers to locate electricity, gas and telecommunications as well as water and waste water services.

The main focus of the present work programme of the NRA is the provision of motorways and high quality dual carriageways on five major inter-urban routes and the upgrading of a large number of other national routes around the country. The function of these routes is to carry high volumes of traffic efficiently between the main urban centres. The use of the margins of such routes for locating services would require access on an ongoing basis for maintenance personnel and their vehicles and materials.

Is there no other service approach?

The NRA considers that these activities would be likely to interfere with the efficient operation of the routes and would have a potential negative impact on road safety. Accordingly, it is understood that the NRA does not favour the use of the margins of major national routes to locate services. The implication in the Deputy's proposal that parallel but separate corridors be provided as part of major road development would also have major cost implications.

However, in the case of other routes, local authorities and the NRA take account of and accommodate the needs of service providers in building new roads and upgrading existing roads. This contributes, among other things, to a reduced need among service providers to open such roads for maintenance and repairs. In addition, the provision of new national roads under the current work programme of the NRA will result in a substantial reduction in the levels of traffic on significant stretches of the existing national network. This will make it more practical and safer for service providers to provide cable and pipe services along these routes if they so wish.

On electricity transmission and distribution networks, I understand very substantial additional costs and maintenance difficulties arise where such infrastructure is placed underground.

On the provision of a separate service road for cyclists and pedestrians, it must be pointed out again that the function of the proposed new major routes is to carry high volumes of traffic efficiently between major urban centres. Apart from the unsuitability of such routes for cyclists and pedestrians, it is unlikely that there would be any significant demand for such facilities over most of the length of such routes. Furthermore, significant stretches of the existing national network, which will be by-passed by the new routes, will become more suitable for meeting the needs of cyclists and pedestrians.

The need to provide for separate facilities for cyclists and pedestrians arises predominantly in an urban and village context and considerable progress is being made in this regard. In recent years the Dublin local authorities and the Dublin Transportation Office have provided 160 kilometres of two-way cycle routes and 2,500 cycle parking spaces. In addition, the Department of the Environment and Local Government has reminded local authorities of the need to ensure that the surface of hard shoulders is adequately maintained so as to ensure the safety and convenience of cyclists.

They need to be reminded again.

Where a local authority wishes to develop cycling and pedestrian facilities along a national route, it is open to it to bring forward proposals to the NRA as part of an overall traffic management plan for the urban centre concerned. In the case of other roads, local authorities may use their discretionary improvement grant allocation or apply to the Department of the Environment and Local Government for funding under the regional traffic management grant scheme for the provision of improved cycle facilities.

The Dáil adjourned at 9.05 p.m. until 10.30 a.m. on Thursday, 31 January 2002.

Barr
Roinn