Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Wednesday, 4 Dec 2002

Vol. 558 No. 5

Priority Questions. - Social Welfare Code.

66.Mr. Connolly asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if criteria such as distance from home to job location and the lack of public transport in rural Ireland will be accepted as mitigating factors when persons on unemployment assistance refuse job offers; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [25083/02]

A person claiming an unemployment payment is expected to make reasonable efforts to obtain employment suitable to his or her age, educational qualifications, skills and experience. A person would be regarded as not being available for work if he or she imposed unreasonable restrictions on the nature of the employment he or she would accept or the location of that employment.

It would be expected that any person seeking employment, whether in an urban or rural area, would be willing to travel a reasonable distance to take up employment. In determining what is reasonable in a certain case, a deciding officer would have regard to the availability of public or private transport and the availability of local employment opportunities. Account would also be taken of average distances travelled to work by other members of the community.

If an unemployed person refuses an offer of employment because of the distance involved, account would be taken of the difficulty in getting to work and the possibilities which exist in that regard. Deciding officers have a level of discretion in determining what is reasonable in such circumstances and, generally, this is not an issue which gives rise to major difficulties. In addition, if a person is refused a payment for this or other reasons, he or she has the option of appealing to the social welfare appeals office which is independent in the exercise of its functions and to which the person can outline the circumstances of his or her case. If the Deputy is aware of a difficulty in a case, I am happy to meet him and have the matter dealt with.

The question was framed in the context of rural Ireland. I have no doubt the Minister is aware of the exceptional difficulties experienced there, especially with the lack of public transport.

When people in rural areas are offered a job, there are two issues with which they must grapple. The first is that it is likely they will have to purchase a car. This involves not only the outlay for the purchase but also for insurance, tax and running costs, something I have no doubt will be more expensive today after the Minister of Finance has had a crack at it. The second issue is whether the offer of work will lead to them losing their medical card. Those are major issues for people.

How does the Minister's Department evaluate a person's availability for work? What criteria are used to establish a single person's circumstances in the context of availability for work? In evaluating a single parent's work availability, is any consideration given to his or her responsibility for caring for children and the fact that he or she would have to employ a babysitter?

People want to return to work and re-enter the workforce. Many people are being needlessly removed from FÁS schemes and placed on the live register again for the sake of saving a mere €24 each week. They are stressed out by this. The Minister used the word "reasonable" on a number of occasions in her reply.

An Leas-Cheann Comhairle

The Deputy should ask a supplementary question, not make a statement.

Everyone's interpretation of the word "reasonable" can be different.

There is no definition of "reasonable distance". What is taken into consideration is the employment situation in each county or area and whether public or private transport is available. I appreciate that work is difficult to find in some rural areas and travelling to it is also difficult. The Deputy adverted to the cost attached to it.

The definition of being available for work was queried by the Joint Committee on Social and Family Affairs and I advised the Chairman I would be in touch regarding this matter. We want people to make a reasonable effort to look for employment. This should be followed through in cases of difficult circumstances. We did not go to three or four different employers to ask them for a letter because there was no job available. That is not acceptable. However, if a reasonable effort is made by someone to look for work, that is accepted.

There are other schemes like the back-to-work and back-to-education schemes. Lone parents and carers are allowed to work a number of hours and keep their secondary benefits. The schemes are in place to allow people to move beyond unemployment and into work and from there into greater employment. The good reductions in tax, introduced by the Minister for Finance during the years, have made life much easier. Having said that, if the Deputy knows of a particular case involving the availability for work scheme or a problem with travel, I would be happy to meet him to discuss it.

Barr
Roinn