Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Wednesday, 19 Feb 2003

Vol. 561 No. 5

Designated Areas.

I welcome the opportunity to raise this important matter. In February 1997, the then Minister for Arts, Culture, Gaeltacht and the Islands, Deputy Michael D. Higgins, introduced the EU Habitats Directive. The Government press release at that time stated that the regulations would allow for the definition and protection of approximately 400 proposed special areas of conservation, or SACs, occupying 550,000 hectares or some 5% of our land mass. The then Minister further stated that the regulations would not interfere with the practice of traditional farming in the areas concerned. He described all partners in the scheme as working together in a valuable national plan. He said landowners would be fairly compensated for any loss of income and would be advised of their entitlements.

Not alone was this promise not honoured by successive Governments but the sterilisation of farmers' land as SACs continues relentlessly. The current situation is that 11% of our land area is designated as SAC which, together with 3% designated as marine SACs, brings the total area sterilised by the Habitats Directive to 14%. In County Mayo, over 20% of the land area is designated as SAC, NHA, natural heritage area, or SPA, special protection area. At a public meeting organised by the IFA in Ballina, County Mayo last night, over 300 angry farmers demanded action from Government. The majority view from the meeting was that farmers feel totally let down by the system which has been in operation and the lack of credible and adequate compensation which they had been promised. They are so upset that they are now insisting that their land be de-designated, that the slate be wiped clean and that a fresh start be made.

People feel they have been robbed of their livelihood and their future. These sterilising statutes have effectively devalued the land, leaving the owners with a bitter taste in their mouths. An asset which was once considered valuable is now virtually worthless. Farmers have held their precious land, which has been defended courageously over the years and coloured by the blood of those who resisted the tyranny of land-grabbing English planters and the vile Black and Tans, dear to their hearts. They now feel totally betrayed at being routed from the very land where even Cromwell was prepared to leave them. What hurts most of all is that they believe they have been sold out by their own Government. This situation will do nothing for the population of an area which has been identified on the basis of census figures as the most economically deprived area in Ireland and where homo sapiens is now an endangered species. I sometimes wonder if we would be treated better if we were an animal species facing extinction.

The SAC scheme has not worked. The Government should clean the slate and start all over again. The huge resentment and loss of faith in Government on this issue is very real and palpable on the ground. How can people be blamed for feeling let down? They were told the designations would apply to 5% of the country, not 14%. They assumed that upland areas would be affected, not the right to build in lowland areas. They trusted that adequate compensation would be paid, but that did not happen. The proud inheritance for which generations in my area slaved and fought, intending it to be passed on to the next generation of farmers, is now worthless. What use is land if one cannot plant or drain it, let animals graze on it, build on it or enhance it in any way?

We are totally over-regulated. People can no longer engage freely in sea fishing or angling competitions. A small farmer will now be prevented from supplementing his income from the land by catching a few fish, while a large super-trawler will scour the entire coastal area within a few hours. Farmers are being forced to de-stock their few sheep because of a change in policy. Our youth are being deprived of their rightful inheritance. If our young people depart, what have we left? We will simply have one big national park, devoid of people. That is happening already. In one case of which I am aware, every inch of a farmer's 200 acres is designated. Consequently, he is prevented from giving even one site to his children. They now must go and live in a far-away urban centre, where they do not want to be and where there are already too many people, with all the problems that living in a place with too many people brings. What sort of logic is this? Give us back our future. De-designate SACs.

Ba mhaith liom mo bhuíochas a ghabháil don Teachta Cowley as ucht na ceiste tábhachtacha seo a ardú ar an Athló agus deis labhartha a thabhairt domsa.

The habitats directive was adopted in 1992 and requires member states to propose areas for designation as special areas of conservation, SACs, to safeguard Europe's most important wildlife areas. The Government committed itself to the implementation of the directive in Ireland, both in view of its nature conservation objectives and to meet our EU obligations.

The process of proposing land and freshwater areas in Ireland for designation as SACs is nearing completion. As the Deputy suggests, the final extent will be close to 11% of our land area, or about 800,000 hectares. The increase over earlier estimates is, however, much less than suggested. As far back as February 1997, when the habitats regulations were introduced, an area of 550,000 hectares was estimated. This has been stated by various sources to be 5%, but was about 8%, of the country's land area. In round terms, of the 11% now estimated, 1% is national parks and other State lands, 1% is large lakes, leaving 9%, or about 650,000 hectares, where lands in private ownership are affected.

An increase in the extent of habitat designations is part of a pattern across Europe. National proposals for SACs have been subject to international evaluation. As a result of this process, all member states have had to put forward additional proposals, to meet their full obligations under the directive and to ensure consistency of implementation. In terms of percentages of territory proposed, Ireland is close to the middle of the range.

In general, existing farming activities are fully compatible with the conservation requirements of designated areas. In such circumstances there will be no need to place restrictions on farming activity. These areas attract a higher level of payments for farmers who join REPS, administered by the Department of Agriculture and Food. I remain committed to paying fair and reasonable compensation to landowners for any actual loss incurred as a result of necessary restrictions of farming activity for conservation purposes.

As the Deputy pointed out, why should farmers be at a loss? It would be tantamount to handing over their land to the State and therefore it is vitally important that there is fair and reasonable compensation. I would be anxious to get details of the cases of which Deputy Cowley has knowledge and certainly would be only too pleased to look at those in conjunction with the officials concerned.

At all times care is taken to respect the property rights of landowners, and that is absolutely essential. We in the Department want to ensure that necessary care is taken to respect the rights of the landowners. The process of designating land is carried out in accordance with the relevant legislation. That legislation provides for notification of known landowners, public advertisement, and a three-month period for objections.

There is no general prohibition on new activities or development within SACs. On the reference which has been made by the Deputy to afforestation or to building on lands, I intend that this will be more fully outlined in the updating of relevant planning guidelines. People should have a right to build on their land. Of course there is a great debate about single houses. It is tremendous in rural Ireland, in my county as in County Mayo, to see new houses being built and people coming home and having an opportunity to live in their own areas. The Minister intends that this will be more fully outlined in the updating of the planning guidelines. Of course there will be an opportunity to discuss this matter at a later stage when these guidelines are made available. New development must be subject to appropriate assessment, usually within the planning system, and can proceed except where significant damage would be caused to the habitat. At all times common sense must, and should, prevail.

Discussions have taken place with farming organisations on compensation and other aspects of implementation of the directive. The Department is ready to continue these discussions when the organisations involved are available to do so. I look forward to further discussions on this vitally important matter with those organisations which represent the interests of farmers.

The Dáil adjourned at 10.35 p.m. until 10.30 a.m. on Thursday, 20 February 2003.

Barr
Roinn