Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Wednesday, 5 Nov 2003

Vol. 573 No. 4

Ceisteanna – Questions (Resumed). Priority Questions. - Animal Diseases.

Mary Upton

Ceist:

110 Dr. Upton asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food the specific laboratory tests which were carried out on animals from farms (details supplied) in County Limerick during an investigation by his Department into reports of animal health problems; the tests which were requested for animal products, that is, milk and meat, from the affected animals; if his Department requested feeding trials on these products; if so, the tests which were requested; the results which are available from these feeding trials; the implications of these cases for the level of confidence in agriculture in the area; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25672/03]

As the Deputy is aware the reported animal health and disease problems of the early to mid-1990s in the Askeaton area were the subject of a multiagency investigation under the auspices of the Environmental Protection Agency, EPA, in which my Department participated. The report of this most comprehensive investigation was published in August 2001 and details of the studies and laboratory tests of animals of all farms, except one farm that withdrew voluntarily in the early stages from the study, are presented in chapter 3 of the main report of the investigations of animal health problems in that area.

Briefly, these results are comprised of the periodic haematology and biochemistry analyses on blood samples collected from a selected group of monitor animals. Additional blood, milk and other samples were collected as required to investigate specific animal health or production issues. Post-mortem investigations and analyses are also undertaken on any animal carcases from these farms submitted to my Department's regional veterinary laboratory in Limerick. Milk samples were also analysed by culture or cell count methods as required by the ongoing investigators and no additional checks on milk or meat products, including feeding trials, were deemed necessary based on the findings of the animal health aspects of the investigation. All such products originating from these farms would have been subjected to the normal food hygiene controls at the processing intake points.

I accept the report published was comprehensive but it contained a number of significant gaps. Will the Minister outline whether tests were carried out on meat and milk in terms of animal feeding trials? I base that question on the potential risk to human health. It is not good enough to say animals are monitored for hygiene when they reach the factory. That is true but this is not a fundamental question on hygiene regarding animal products. It is much more significant than that. Concerns have been expressed for many years about animal and human health and environmental factors. Many of them have not been discounted. If feeding trials were not carried out, why not? I would like an answer to that specific question.

The EPA carried out a comprehensive study in this area. All relevant tests were undertaken. Feed tests were deemed unnecessary based on the animal health aspects of the investigation which were, ante and post mortem tests at the various processing plants and they went much further than the hygiene aspects of the study. The overall conclusion of the study, as published in the final report, was that there was no evidence that animal health or production on any of the participating farms were subject to unusual adverse influences during the periods of observation. The incidence of diseases were generally within acceptable limits and no serious disease outbreaks were encountered. These results, together with those of the other studies, that comprised the Askeaton investigations, provide no evidence to suggest that animal health problems in the Askeaton area were significantly different to those of other comparable farming areas in Ireland.

I accept the findings of the EPA report in so far as they were substantial and were published. I put it to the Minister that the report contains major gaps. Those gaps raise questions of unfinished business from where, potentially, problems will arise. I would be most unhappy to learn that no tests were sought in terms of animal feeding trials to show whether there was a safety issue regarding human health arising from the consumption of products derived from animals in that area.

The report contained no evidence that human health was in any way affected by products produced in the area. This was a most comprehensive and in-depth exercise, based on scientific evidence, in the course of which specialist expertise from various quarters was brought to bear on analyses of animal health, human health and environmental issues in the Askeaton area. In so far as the possible causes of animal health difficulties experienced in the Askeaton area in the past are concerned, I believe this report speaks for itself.

Barr
Roinn