One of the more interesting roles I had when I was a member of Cork City Council was in helping in the preparation of the Cork area strategic plan, which was the successor to the land use and transportation study. The latter was the first regional study in the country to advocate large-scale public transport infrastructure on a regional basis. While the land use and transportation study succeeded in many of its objectives, it failed spectacularly to deliver in the greater Cork area on any major public transport initiative. The Cork area strategic plan has a better capacity to do so. In the past, there may not have been as great an impetus towards promotion on behalf of local authorities and there was no willingness to provide adequate resources at national government level.
The Government has as its stated policy the strategic rail review. It has recognised that Cork suburban rail is worthy of support to the extent that the feasibility of the project is grounded on the delivery of a development strategy. The Cork local authorities have gone as far as they can in delivering such a development strategy. The plan to justify the existence of an enhanced rail network in the Cork area is more advanced than ever. The plan exists on two levels to enhance the existing Cork-Mallow line by running services from Blarney with further new stations at Kilbarry and Monard where it is hoped there will be new housing developments. More importantly, the greatest demand is in east Cork and this will be addressed by reopening the Cork-Midleton line and opening new stations at Carrigtwohill and Midleton.
The Cork rail feasibility study that was required of the Cork local authorities under the strategic rail review, provides the economic and logistic basis for the creation of this service and outlines the various costings involved. For instance, the Midleton component would cost approximately €35 million at 2000 prices while the upgrading of the Cork-Mallow line would cost approximately €20 million. Kent Station in Cork also needs to be upgraded but the cost of all the proposed works would still be less than the amount being spent on the upgrading of Heuston Station and that which was spent upgrading Connolly Station.
It is 12 months since the publication of the Cork rail feasibility study and the Government needs to send a positive signal. That would redeem and rescue it from the morass that is its public transport policy. If a positive decision was made on Cork suburban rail, I assure the Government it will not encounter the difficulties associated with Luas and the DART upgrade.
Cork suburban rail is needed and, if provided, it will work. It is capable of achieving operational cost effectiveness by 2020. The capital may never be recovered but the recovery of capital is never sought on road projects. The Government cannot point to a public transport initiative under which it was proposed it would pay for itself within a set period. My colleagues in the Cork area and I believe the case for improved, enhanced suburban rail is beyond question. The Government should make the necessary funding available and give the necessary signal because the basis of the Faber Mansell Cork rail feasibility study will be outdated if a signal is not given by the end of the year or the beginning of next year so that the infrastructure can be in place by 2008.