Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Wednesday, 25 Feb 2004

Vol. 580 No. 6

Order Of Business.

The Order of Business today shall be No. a1, Civil Registration Bill 2003 — Amendments from the Seanad; No. 20, Private Security Services Bill 2001 — Order for Report, Report and Final Stages, to adjourn at 1.30 p.m. if not previously concluded; and No. 3, Social Welfare (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill 2004 — Order for Second Stage and Second Stage.

It is proposed, notwithstanding anything in Standing Orders, that the Dáil shall sit later than 8.30 p.m. tonight and business shall be interrupted not later than 10 p.m. Private Members' Business shall be No. 38, motion re Irish language, resumed, to conclude at 8.30 p.m.

Is the proposal for the late sitting agreed? Agreed.

I am pleased the Government Whip has continued the process of not guillotining legislation, for which she is to be commended. On the Government's announcement yesterday to proceed with electronic voting, I ask the Taoiseach about the legislation proposed. Will the Government consider consulting the Leaders of the Opposition parties about appointments to the independent panel, if it is to have any measure of independence and trust? Second, if the panel were to recommend, on the basis of its assessment of the proposal——

The Deputy is out of order. He is going well beyond what is appropriate on the Order of Business.

I will finish in 15 seconds.

I suggest that the Deputy submit a question on the matter.

The Taoiseach might like to answer the question.

We cannot have an Order of Business where people ask questions about everything.

The Taoiseach can make a recommendation, based on his best assessment, that the matter should be deferred. Will the Government accept the recommendations of the panel whatever they may be?

That issue may be raised when the Bill comes before the House or it can be raised by way of a question to the Taoiseach. It is not appropriate to the Order of Business which just deals with when legislation comes before the House. I call Deputy Rabbitte.

The first question is reasonable.

It is a reasonable question, which is why I suggest it should be submitted in a structured way. I call Deputy Rabbitte.

I am asking the Taoiseach——

(Interruptions).

The Taoiseach wants to answer.

We cannot have a debate on the matter. Leaders' Questions was introduced in this House to facilitate Members who have questions such as the Deputy's. I call Deputy Rabbitte.

On a point of order, is it in order that the Taoiseach be consulted by Opposition parties?

Of course it is in order as long as it is done at the right time and in the right place.

Why am I being ruled out of order then?

(Interruptions).

I call Deputy Rabbitte.

A Cheann Comhairle, you have not allowed my leader——

The Deputy must not interrupt his leader.

The Taoiseach wants to answer.

Why am I being ruled out of order?

I am ruling the Deputy out of order because the matter is not appropriate on the Order of Business.

(Interruptions).

On a point of order, legislation is promised regarding electronic voting which will incorporate the appointment of an independent electoral commission.

That is not a point of order. I call Deputy Rabbitte.

A Cheann Comhairle, you have not heard my point of order.

It is not a point of order. A point of order deals with Standing Orders and how they are implemented. I call Deputy Rabbitte.

Please listen to my point of order. The Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government will be announcing the appointees to the commission before the legislation is introduced.

That is not a point of order, Deputy. I call Deputy Rabbitte.

(Interruptions).

On a point of order——

Sorry, Deputy, we cannot go on in this fashion.

I do not intend to go on. I am trying to make a point. The point raised by Deputy Kenny is a valid question pertaining to——

The Chair has ruled on the matter. I ask the Deputy to resume his seat.

The Chair may be wrong.

The Chair is not wrong in this instance. I ask the Deputy to resume his seat.

The Chair may be wrong when the Taoiseach wants to answer.

I ask the Deputy to resume his seat. If there is an orchestrated——

I ask for your assistance, a Cheann Comhairle, to make one last point. If this is how you intend to run the business, you are essentially ruling the Opposition out of order.

No, Deputy——

You are impeding us in our job as an Opposition.

Sorry, Deputy——

(Interruptions).

The Chair is obliged to implement Standing Orders. The Deputy is a party Whip and if he wishes to change the Standing Order, the Chair will be only too delighted to implement the new Standing Order. I call Deputy Rabbitte.

(Interruptions).

The Taoiseach wants to answer the question and you, a Cheann Comhairle, are refusing to allow him to do so.

On a point of order——

If it is not a point of order, the Chair will have to take action.

It is a point of order. How can a commission appointed by the Government be independent?

It is not a point of order. The Deputy must resume his seat.

How can it be independent?

The Deputy must resume his seat or leave the House.

(Interruptions).

The Deputy must resume his seat. I call Deputy Rabbitte.

Will the Taoiseach say when the Bill to facilitate the implementation of electronic voting will be before the House? If it is the case that the Government is supporting the Labour Party motion introduced last night and endorsed by Fine Gael, I thank the Taoiseach.

Sorry, Deputy, that does not arise at this stage.

I am trying to establish this because the record is difficult to follow. It shows that the Minister, Deputy Ó Cuív, proposed the Sinn Féin amendment but, unfortunately, it does not record the Minister. I was here and I had great difficulty following him anyway. I am trying to find out whether the Government is supporting the motion to have Irish enshrined as an official language of the European Union? If so, will the Taoiseach say when he intends to initiate that procedure with the Commission?

On the first question, the legislation is being given priority. Obviously we want to introduce the Bill as quickly as possible. I do not have the date, but it will be dealt with as quickly as possible. It is a very short Bill, the heads of which are being prepared this week in the Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government. I hope it will be with the Attorney General before the end of the week.

On the second question, there is no Government amendment to tonight's motion.

Does that mean the Government is supporting the motion endorsed by the three parties? Why is it so coy? We spent all night last night trying to find out from the Minister, Deputy Ó Cuív, where he stood and at the end of 30 minutes we did not know.

We cannot have a debate on the issue now. Perhaps on Private Members' Business tonight——

The Minister of State, Deputy Tim O'Malley, came in and said that he thought they were voting against the motion.

I call Deputy Sargent.

We are entitled to know whether there will be a division.

That matter would normally come up on Private Members' Business. It is not a matter for the Order of Business.

I accept——

I allowed the Deputy's question. The Taoiseach answered it and I have now called Deputy Sargent. We cannot have a debate on the issue because time has been allocated for debate later tonight.

I do not want a debate. I merely want to ask the Taoiseach if he and his Government are supporting the motion.

That question has been asked. I call Deputy Sargent.

(Interruptions).

Tá cuma ar an scéal nach mbeidh vóta ar an gceist anocht. Is cúis áthais í sin agus, le cúnamh Dé, beidh an Rialtas ag gníomhú dá réir. May I ask about promised legislation? During Taoiseach's questions we discussed a number of issues related to the cross-departmental body on infrastructure. I hope the buildings control Bill will ensure that building regulations can become more energy efficient. More than 60,000 units were built last year without the energy efficiency required.

We cannot have a statement on that matter now.

I want to highlight the urgency of the Bill and the action needed.

The Deputy has made his point.

There are 55 heads to the buildings controls Bill and they have been approved. The Bill has been passed for drafting and it is hoped it will ready in the summer depending on other priorities.

I heard the Taoiseach say the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government is giving priority to the promised Bill on electronic voting. Am I to understand from that, that the Minister is giving priority to that Bill over the drafting of Report Stage amendments to the Residential Tenancies Bill to give rights to private sector tenants? The Bill was published last May and it has only now completed Committee Stage, some three years after the Commission on the Private Rented Sector reported. Do I understand the Taoiseach correctly that the Minister's priority currently is to draft legislation on electronic voting rather than address the four year wait for legislation to provide for the rights of tenants?

It is not promised legislation.

The Residential Tenancies Bill has been ordered for Report Stage. I understand the Bill is to be taken in the House some time in March.

Arising from that, if that Bill is to be taken some time in March, can the Taoiseach indicate if the Bill on electronic voting will be taken before or after that Bill?

The Bill is not published yet so I cannot indicate that.

What is the answer?

The Deputy got an answer to his question.

The Ceann Comhairle might be able to help me out on this occasion. I tabled a question to the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government apropos of electronic voting and other matters asking about contracts or procurements funded by his Department to which I got a reply which states that it would take a disproportionate amount of time to compile this information——

Has the Deputy a question appropriate to legislation?

This question is appropriate to legislation.

It is not and neither is it appropriate to the Order of Business.

The reply goes on to state that it would necessitate examination of material over a seven year period.

That is not appropriate to the Order of Business.

How can I get an answer to that question? The Ceann Comhairle might be able to help me out to stop my blood pressure going up.

If the Deputy wishes to contact the office of the Ceann Comhairle, I will be glad to assist him——

Has the Minister taken a vow of silence or is he sulking?

——but as of now I cannot under the provisions of Standing Orders.

Why does the Minister not want to answer the question? It is a simple one.

I call Deputy Lynch.

I am sure that with a little encouragement from the Ceann Comhairle, the Minister might be prevailed upon to answer that question.

The Chair is obliged to implement Standing Orders.

The Minister for Social, Community and Family Affairs announced this morning that she will introduce regulations regarding the accession countries, which mark the latest expansion of the EU. Will she include in those regulations——

The content of the regulations are not appropriate to the Order of Business. I suggest the Deputy submits a question directly to the Minister. Are regulations promised?

There are amendments to the Bill.

If the regulations are to be introduced as an amendment to the Bill, will the Taoiseach encourage the Minister to amend the Bill in regard to rent allowance——

That does not arise on the Order of Business and the Deputy knows that. I call Deputy Michael Higgins. If Deputy Lynch does not resume her seat and allow her colleague Deputy Michael Higgins to speak, I will move on to the next business.

——to take the people off the streets whom she has forced on to the streets? Will she ensure that what the Tánaiste wanted will not be part of the legislation——

I will have to move on to No. 10.

——whereby people who cannot afford private rented accommodation will have to stay at home with their parents?

I am moving on to the next business. I call Deputy Michael Higgins.

With regard to the amendments to the Social Welfare (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill, to which the Taoiseach has referred, will a parallel amendment be made to the legislation governing the European Convention on Human Rights, which would appear to be necessary, if what the Minister for Social Welfare announced this morning is to have legal effect?

I do not think so, but the amendments will be brought forward in the next few days.

On secondary legislation, a major problem has arisen with the rapid growth of new communities around the suburbs of Dublin where thousands of eligible voters who are not on the initial Register of Electors——

Has the Deputy a question appropriate to the Order of Business?

I have to explain very briefly the issue; it is an important one.

It is important.

What promised legislation is the secondary legislation?

It relates to secondary legislation. To get on the supplemental Register of Electors before the local and European elections, thousands of people would be required to make a pilgrimage to the Garda station to get their applications stamped, which is not a requirement to get on the first phase of the register. That requirement is a major barrier to thousands of people registering on the electoral register.

I am moving on. I call Deputy Costello.

I am asking a perfectly valid question.

About what promised secondary legislation is the Deputy asking?

I am asking the Taoiseach if he will examine the secondary legislation to change that requirement.

That is not appropriate to the Order of Business; only promised secondary legislation is appropriate. I call Deputy Costello.

In view of the Taoiseach's programme for Government, an objective of which is to increase electoral participation, will he look into this and bring forward legislation?

I suggest the Deputy submits a question to the appropriate Minister.

The Taoiseach is responsible for the overall——

If the Deputy wishes to submit a question it will be directed to the appropriate Minister. I call Deputy Costello.

Will the Ceann Comhairle allow the Taoiseach to make a brief response?

No, because if I do, I will have to allow every Deputy in the House to ask about any matter that is not promised legislation.

Is legislation promised in that regard?

Is legislation promised?

Legislation is not promised.

Legislation is not promised. I call Deputy Costello.

I refer to the proposed programme of Bills that will be published this session. I note the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform has five new Bills to be published — that is in addition to his 30 plus Bills listed on the paper.

We are not debating them now.

I ask the Minister to allow Deputy Costello to make his point.

We will shortly discuss Report Stage of a 2001 Bill from the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, which is two and a half years old.

Has the Deputy a question appropriate to the Order of Business?

Can the Taoiseach indicate when the corpus of justice legislation will be addressed?

There is always a number of the justice Bills before the House. I agree with my constituency colleague that if we spent more time here discussing legislation, we would not have all these outstanding Bills.

The Minister and his colleagues appear to have forgotten completely what they were like when they were on this side of the House.

I ask the Deputy to allow his colleague, Deputy Seán Ryan to ask a question appropriate to the Order of Business.

They will return to this side of House the very soon.

Deputy Seán Ryan should not be deflected by the interruptions.

(Interruptions).

I wish to ask the Taoiseach two pertinent questions. I am speaking on behalf of blind people and those who are visually impaired.

The Deputy is talking to the right people.

In the context of electronic voting and the preparation of——

If the Deputy's question is on electronic voting——

It is in regard to the proposed legislation on electronic voting.

We cannot discuss the content of that legislation.

I am well aware of that. In the preparation of the heads of that Bill, will the Taoiseach arrange for a speech package to be provided to incorporate the needs of people with disabilities?

That will arise when we deal with the legislation. Has the Deputy a second question?

(Interruptions).

We will see. I support the PDs. We will see.

Deputy Rabbitte should not interrupt his colleague, Deputy Seán Ryan.

The little man from Waterford will back off yet.

Has the Taoiseach any plans in the context of new health and safety legislation——

Are you going to make an application?

If Deputy Callely was more interested in the needs of the elderly, he would not be laughing at this question.

It has been a long haul. The Deputy is making a good job of it.

In the context of the new health and safety-——

I ask the Minister of State, Deputy Callely, to allow Deputy Seán Ryan to continue without interruption.

This is the longest question I have ever posed on the Order of Business.

We are becoming elderly listening to the Deputy.

Under the new health and safety legislation, are there any proposals to introduce legislation for corporate manslaughter?

Who did the Deputy have in mind?

A health and safety Bill is to be published this session.

I call Deputy McManus.

I was wondering why the Minister was making a joke of this. This is an important issue.

I was not the only one laughing at the Deputy.

Deputy Seán Ryan should resume his seat. The Minister should allow Deputy Ryan to resume his seat.

The Government intends to get rid of democratic accountability in our health boards by way of legislation.

Has the Deputy a question on legislation?

I have. I have two questions.

The Deputy is not allowed preface a question.

She is not allowed to preface it with what she might say in a Second Stage speech or leading up to that Stage.

The Ceann Comhairle should not interrupt the question. This is an inappropriate interruption from the Chair.

The Chair never interrupts. The Chair intervenes, when necessary.

There is much time-wasting, but it is not coming from me.

It is coming from the Chair.

It is coming from the Deputy's party.

When will legislation, entitled the health (amendment) Bill, to abolish democratic accountability in our health boards come before the House? When I table a parliamentary question seeking to know the impact on my local hospital, which is a health board hospital, of the Hanly report changes and I receive a rubbish reply which has nothing to do with the question, what can the Ceann Comhairle do, as the guardian of my rights and those of other Members of this House, to protect my right to the information I am entitled to have on behalf of my constituents?

The Chair, since the establishment of the State, has no control over the reply to questions.

The heads of the health (amendment) Bill were approved prior to Christmas and the Bill will be published and taken in the House during the current session.

Barr
Roinn