It is proposed to take No. 15, the Health and Social Care Professionals Bill 2004 [Seanad] — Report Stage (resumed) and Final Stage, to adjourn at 1.30 p.m. if not previously concluded; No. 17, the Employment Permits Bill 2005 — Second Stage (resumed); and No. 18, the Parental Leave (Amendment) Bill 2004 [Seanad] — Second Stage (resumed).
Order of Business.
There are no proposals to put to the House.
In view of the reports of the appalling conditions being experienced in the mountains of Pakistan and the fact the Government considered sending personnel to tsunami stricken countries, will the Ministers for Finance and Foreign Affairs raise this matter with their European counterparts? With the approach of an apparently severe winter and truly appalling conditions, more needs to be done as a matter of urgency. Perhaps the Government will take that on board.
Is it possible to indicate the commencement date of the western rail line from Ennis?
The second question is not relevant to the Order of Business.
I knew the Ceann Comhairle would knock me on that.
I will allow the first question. I suggest the Deputy submits a question to the appropriate Minister.
We all recognise the very serious situation in Pakistan as a result of the earthquake. I understand Ireland was the highest per capita contributor in the world in terms of financial assistance, of which we should all be proud. Obviously, the magnitude of the problems are such that the Minister for Foreign Affairs will send people to Pakistan to see how we can further assist the non-government organisations which are doing all they can to continue with a co-ordinated effort. I know time is running out and I share the concern of the leader of the Opposition in terms of doing all we can for a very stricken people who require the world’s attention and assistance.
The detailed implementation of Transport 21 is a matter to be put to the Minister for Transport on Question Time.
Yesterday the Northern Secretary, with what some would think a bizarre sense of timing, published legislation in the House of Commons concerning "on the runs". The numbers seem to have exploded from the anticipated couple of dozen to a few hundred. Is the Minister satisfied that no legislation is required in this jurisdiction? Given the statutory independence of the Director of Public Prosecutions and the operational autonomy of the Garda Síochána, is the Minister satisfied there is no constitutional infirmity in not introducing primary legislation in the House?
The advice available to the Government is that there is no constitutional infirmity attaching to the proposal to set up an eligibility board which will subsequently determine for the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform what cases will be submitted for pardon from the President under Article 13 of the Constitution.
How can someone who has not been convicted be pardoned?
We cannot debate the matter. It does not arise on the Order of Business.
There is a need for it. How can someone who has not been convicted be pardoned? That should be clarified at least.
Unless legislation is promised, the Deputy should table a question to the appropriate Minister.
The Government is cherry picking again.
Yesterday a member of one of the Government parties spoke about ending the special relationship with the Catholic Church. Does the Minister for Finance believe the Government has a special relationship with the Catholic Church?
That does not arise. I call Deputy Jim O'Keeffe.
I am asking about legislation.
The Deputy should find another way to raise this issue.
I am asking about promised legislation.
No, the Deputy is not. I will call him later on promised legislation only.
On another occasion, we will come back to the need for legislation to deal with the "on the runs". However, the continuing delay on the part of the Government in dealing with the coroner's legislation, which has been in place for more than 40 years, is a more urgent matter. Reform in this area was recommended in a report five years ago. Legislation has been promised every year since the Government took up office but we still have not had sight of it. Yesterday, another problem arose in the Coroner's Court regarding attendance of medical witnesses at an inquest. Will the coroner's legislation be introduced as a matter of urgency instead of making another promise?
I am aware of the issues raised by the Deputy and this is a long-standing matter. Reform is required in updating the coroner's legislation. A Bill is in preparation to provide for reform of the coroners service and to replace the Coroner's Act 1962.
I was told that, three years ago.
It is due to be enacted next year.
I was also told that, three years ago.
The Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government is present. Could he communicate to the Minister for Finance when he intends to bring the text of the building control Bill to Cabinet?
I understand that will happen shortly.
How short is a piece of string?
Will the extension of the higher level of fee payment from January until June to counsel involved in the tribunals affect the publication of the tribunals of inquiry Bill? Does the Minister expect it to be published before the end of this session?
The legislation will be published this session. It is not affected by the extension of payments, which is intended to facilitate the chairman of that tribunal to complete his inquiries.
Does the Government intend to propose to deal with the unsavoury practice of Ministers advertising their wares in the media generally and upsetting the public on two levels, first, by invading their privacy and, second, by using public funds?
That does not arise on the Order of Business. The Deputy is being disorderly. He raised the matter yesterday. Has the Deputy a question on legislation?
I refer to the Finance Bill, which can address this issue.
Unlike an unfortunate episode involving a previous Administration, we do not intend any leaks before the publication of the Finance Bill.
The Minister has been involved in an unfortunate incident during his own tenure. What about Parlon country?
During the time the Minister for Finance served as Minister for Health and Children, the shortage of nurses was beginning to manifest itself. Is he aware the position has deteriorated significantly?
Has the Deputy a question on legislation?
The shortage is at an all-time high of 1,100 nurses, despite various initiatives. We have been waiting for the nurses Bill for quite some time. Will the Minister take the issue seriously enough to ensure sufficient nurses are in place and the legislation is introduced?
That will be published next year. I am aware, that since my time in the Department, every effort has been made by An Bord Altranais and the Health Service Executive to provide adequate numbers of nurses. The number has increased since my time in the Department.
The Minister is not delivering.
I have two questions on promised legislation. First, are there legislative proposals to end the so-called special relationship with the church?
That does not arise on the Order of Business. The Deputy will have to resume his seat if he does not obey the Chair.
Deputy O'Donnell has left town.
I refer to the third level student support Bill.
The Minister for Education and Science hopes to publish that Bill next year. As the Deputy will be aware, legislation is not envisaged on the other matter.
I did not know that; that is why I asked.
Under the draft constitutional treaty produced during our Presidency, it is the intention of all Governments in the European Union to continue legitimate dialogue with faith communities in their societies on the basis of a mature relationship, which we seek with all faiths in this pluralist society. It would be thoroughly illiberal if such a dialogue were not to take place.
The Minister for Social and Family Affairs has promised to change the one-parent family payment to a totally new family friendly system. When will this happen?
The development of policy and changes in arrangements are provided for in the Social Welfare Bill but none are imminent.
When will the promised legislation to establish TG4 on an independent statutory basis be brought before Cabinet?
It will probably be introduced next year.
I refer to crime in the Border area. The culprits are known and excellent video footage is available, but, unfortunately, they live in Northern Ireland and they are untouchable. They are terrorising——
Has the Deputy a question on legislation?
When will the crimes Bill be introduced to ensure cross-Border co-operation in criminal investigations?
It is not possible to say at this stage. I will take note of the Deputy's comments and communicate them to the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform.
As the Ceann Comhairle probably knows, section 2 of the code of conduct for officeholders states, "Holders of public office enjoy an enhanced public profile and should be mindful of the need to avoid the use of public resources in a way that could reasonably be construed as an inappropriate raising of profile in the context of a general election".
Has the Deputy a question on legislation?
Will the Minister for Finance ensure compliance with the code of conduct?
That does not arise on the Order of Business. The Deputy is being disorderly. The matter was dealt with yesterday and the Deputy knows how to deal with it if he wishes to pursue it.
The Minister wants to reply.
The issue is today's newspapers.
Questions relating to the code of conduct of officeholders have been raised on the Order of Business traditionally. I am merely asking the Minister for Finance if he will ensure——
The Deputy is concerned about breaches of the code of conduct, which are dealt with by the Standards in Public Office Commission.
I have no wish to refer my friend, the junior Minister, to the commission. I am asking the Minister for Finance for a statement of Government policy that, henceforth, he will ensure the code is complied with.
The Chair has made a ruling that has been in place since the relevant legislation was passed.
On a point of order, personal statements were made in the House in previous instances of alleged breaches of the code of conduct.
It is a matter for any Member if he or she wishes to make a statement. He or she must notify the Ceann Comhairle's office and time will be provided.
The Minister has been asked whether the practice is in accord with the code of conduct.
That is not a point of order. Deputy Boyle has been called. I ask Deputy Durkan to resume his seat.
Asking me to resume my seat will not answer the question.
We are observing a code of misconduct from Deputy Callely.
Deputy Callely is on the rails.
He is off the rails.
Two documents laid before the Dáil on today's Order Paper relate to proposals regarding the 7th Framework Programme 2007-2011 of the EURATOM Treaty. There is ongoing debate on a sunset clause in the European constitution so the EURATOM Treaty would go out of existence. Is there an opportunity to debate the need for this organisation and this country's involvement in a treaty that compromises our participation in debates on nuclear safety in other countries?
It is a matter for the Whips to arrange a debate on that or any other issue and if the Green Party wishes to promote this matter as a priority it can raise the matter on Private Members' business if Government time is not available.
It is not the responsibility for the Whips to arrange debates in this House. The Government should make proposals that the Whips can discuss.
On the Order of Business it is only appropriate to raise debates that have been promised.
What Deputy Cowen said is not right and it is regularly stated. If Deputy Kitt does not receive instructions, there is nothing he can do.
I have never heard Deputy Stagg echo such a sense of powerlessness.
Next week we will debate the Sea-Fisheries and Maritime Jurisdiction Bill, presented three weeks ago. Following the comments of Deputy Noel O'Flynn in Brussels, will new legislation be introduced?
Concerning the central plank of the e-Government programme, does the Minister intend to make proposals on the waste and incompetence in the roll-out of the REACH programme? The Minister, the Taoiseach and the Chief Whip are ultimately responsible for REACH. Will the Minister make time available on the excellent report——
On promised——
I have not yet asked the question. Will the Minister make time available for the excellent report of the Committee of Public Accounts, drafted by Deputy Rabbitte, on a new system of Estimates, whereby Deputies could have an input into budgetary considerations? I ask in view of the fact the Minister did not answer some recent questions.
I am available to answer questions at any time. The report of the Committee of Public Accounts is quite short, with an addendum including work by Deputy Rabbitte. I have read the report and it will be taken into account in the context of budgetary reform, to which I referred in my last budget speech. Yesterday, I discussed some aspects of this with Deputy Bruton. The principle of accountability refers to action taken by Government and accounted for to the Houses of the Oireachtas and its committees. It must remain the duty of the Government to propose the budgetary process and be held accountable thereafter.
The e-Government programme is making progress, under the auspices of the Department of the Taoiseach.
The Sea-Fisheries and Maritime Jurisdiction Bill will be debated as published.
Amendments will follow.
When will we see legislation on property management companies? Is this legislation intended to apply only to apartment developments? Will it regulate the new agency due to established early next year?
The Minister is awaiting a Law Reform Commission report before deciding what, if any, legislative changes are necessary.