Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Tuesday, 13 Jun 2006

Vol. 621 No. 4

Written Answers.

The following are questions tabled by Members for written response and the ministerial replies as received on the day from the Departments [unrevised].
Questions Nos. 1 to 13, inclusive, answered orally.
Questions Nos. 14 to 51, inclusive, resubmitted.
Questions Nos. 52 to 59, inclusive, answered orally.

Nuclear Safety.

Eamon Ryan

Ceist:

60 Mr. Eamon Ryan asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the action he will take in pursuing the MOX case in view of the recent European Court of Justice ruling on the court’s remit. [22582/06]

Seán Ryan

Ceist:

62 Mr. S. Ryan asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the effect of the recent European Court of Justice decision that it had jurisdiction in the matter concerning the commissioning and operation of the MOX plant at Sellafield which Ireland had originally referred to an international tribunal; and the action he proposes to take arising from this new and enhanced position of the European Court of Justice. [22450/06]

Gay Mitchell

Ceist:

72 Mr. G. Mitchell asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the reason he did not consult the EU institutions before initiating legal action at the UN in relation to the taking of the legal case to close Sellafield; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22523/06]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 60, 62 and 72 together.

I refer to the reply to Priority Question No. 56 on today's Order Paper.

House Prices.

Ivor Callely

Ceist:

61 Mr. Callely asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if he is satisfied regarding the housing market, especially in relation to house prices for new and second hand houses; the measures that have been put in place to stabilise the market; the expected long-term market indicators; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22316/06]

Olwyn Enright

Ceist:

69 Ms Enright asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if he will make a statement on the recent report from TSB-ESRI house price index that house price growth is at a six year high; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22529/06]

Michael Noonan

Ceist:

110 Mr. Noonan asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the way in which he will tackle the issue of affordability of housing for first time purchasers; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22531/06]

Martin Ferris

Ceist:

130 Mr. Ferris asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the actions he is taking to curtail ongoing house price increases which according to the figures released by the ESRI and Permanent TSB rose by 5% from January to April 2006. [22481/06]

Eamon Gilmore

Ceist:

142 Mr. Gilmore asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if his attention has been drawn to the fact that the rise in house prices here is contributing to a new type of poverty whereby those struggling to accumulate a deposit for a home often find that they are unable to furnish it; his views on the recent findings of the Permanent TSB House Price Index that house prices have risen faster since the beginning of 2006 than at any other time since 2000; if his attention has further been drawn to the fact that such a rise was happening; the steps he intends to take in light of the continuing surge in house prices; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22471/06]

Ivor Callely

Ceist:

420 Mr. Callely asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the consideration, reports or recommendations his Department has received to introduce measures to assist first time house buyers; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22319/06]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 61, 69, 110, 130, 142 and 420 together.

I refer to the reply to Questions Nos. 53 and 55 on today's Order Paper. As indicated in that reply, the Government have taken action on a wide front to maximise access to home ownership, particularly through measures to promote adequate supply of housing to meet very strong demand. In particular, we have supported first time buyers through a range of targeted measures, notably affordable housing schemes and stamp duty reduction. Reduced stamp duty yielded significant savings for first time buyers and has been particularly beneficial for people saving for a deposit.

It is not possible for me to comment in detail on the Permanent TSB house price index, which is based on Permanent TSB's own lending transactions. However, the figures published by my Department showing the actual overall average house prices for the whole market, based on returns from all lending institutions, do not show the rate of price growth at a six year high.

The Department's figures indicate that, with the exception of a period between the third quarter of 2001 and the second quarter of 2002, the rate of increase in new house prices nationally at the last quarter of 2005 was lower than at any time since 1996. The rate of increase for second hand houses at the last quarter of 2005 was also lower than the rate during most of the period between 1996 and 2004.

Government policy in this area has been informed by a range of reports and recommendations, including three reports on the housing market by Peter Bacon and Associates in the period 1998 to 2000, The National Economic and Social Council report on the housing sector in 2004 and the Sustaining Progress Agreement, in which the Affordable Housing Initiative was included as a special initiative. In addition, the Affordable Homes Partnership in 2005 was established following a progress report on the implementation of the Affordable Housing Initiative by Mr Des Geraghty. My Department has regard on an ongoing basis to relevant material in reports by various public and private sector bodies. It will continue to monitor closely developments and views so as to provide effective input to policy in relation to housing.

Questions No. 62 answered with QuestionNo. 60.

EU Directives.

Shane McEntee

Ceist:

63 Mr. McEntee asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if he will make a statement on progress to date in enforcing waste electrical and electronic equipment regulations; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22573/06]

The United Nations has labelled electrical & electronic waste as one of the world's fastest growing and most dangerous waste streams. The European Union was so concerned about this form of waste that it enacted the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive aimed at bringing the problem under control in 2002. On 13th August 2005, Ireland became one of only 3 EU Member States to fully implement this Directive when the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Regulations came into effect.

The policy has been more successful than anyone imagined:

• In less than 7 months 14,500 tonnes of Waste Electrical & Electronic Equipment were collected for recycling

• This included 11,000 tonnes of fridges and freezers and over 1,000 tonnes of old TVs.

• This is the equivalent to an annual collection rate of 6.7Kg per person, way ahead of our EU target of 4Kg per person by 2008.

As a result of this Government initiative Ireland is to the fore in terms of recycling waste electrical and electronic equipment and we are now seeing major investments being made in a whole new recycling industry.

Enforcement of the Regulations is a matter for the Environmental Protection Agency and the local authorities. I am pleased to say that implementation is being vigorously pursued. In excess of 700 cases have been taken up by the Agency and the vast majority of producers and retailers approached have been steered towards full compliance by this intervention. To date there have been three successful prosecutions brought by the Agency.

Social and Affordable Housing.

Dan Neville

Ceist:

64 Mr. Neville asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government his proposals for social housing; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22532/06]

The new Housing Policy Framework: Building Sustainable Communities launched by Government last December outlines a substantially increased programme of investment in social and affordable housing measures for the period 2006-2008.

Exchequer capital resources provided by my Department for these measures for this period stand at almost €4 billion, over 20% higher than the past three years, and this sum increases to over €6.5 billion when non-voted and current spending provisions are included.

This money will be invested in response to identified need, with in the region of 23,000 new units of social housing to be commenced over the same period. In addition, further households will be assisted through the new Rental Accommodation Scheme. In total, we expect some 50,000 households to benefit from various social and affordable housing measures over the coming three years.

The strength of existing social housing programmes is demonstrated in the fact that work was in progress on over 10,000 social housing units at the end of 2005 which augurs well for increased output this year.

The local authority housing programme is part of the wider social and affordable housing programmes for which the main strategy for delivery is the local authority 5-year Action Plans for social and affordable housing. The Action Plans, now at their midway stage are currently being reviewed. The outcome of the reviews will ensure that local authorities continue to have a framework for the integrated and cohesive planning and delivery over the coming years of specific social and affordable housing measures based on their relevant housing strategy.

Waste Disposal.

Ruairí Quinn

Ceist:

65 Mr. Quinn asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if he is satisfied that the costings made in relation to the proposed Ringsend incineration plant in 1997 are still valid; and if he intends to reassess the financial analysis and costing model of the incineration process in view of the possibility that a range of costs may have been omitted from the original costings. [22486/06]

The project in question is being advanced by Dublin City Council, acting on behalf of the local authorities in the Dublin region whose regional waste management plan identifies the need for the facility concerned.

The initial costings drawn up in 1997 related to outline assessment of the thermal treatment option. The site in Ringsend had not been identified at that stage. The 1997 projections prepared by the City Council are not a baseline for assessing the value for money in relation to this project.

The necessarily protracted procurement process, by way of public private partnership, for the proposed Ringsend plant has however involved a very high degree of financial analysis and careful costing. The requirements of the public private partnership procurement process include analysis by the National Development Finance Agency of a project's financial parameters in order to assure value for money. Furthermore, both a public sector benchmark (the notional cost if a project were to be developed purely by the public sector), and an affordability cap (the level at which a procurement process should be abandoned and the project delivered by other means) are set in respect of projects to be delivered through public private partnership.

My Department's role, as I have already indicated, was confined to reviewing the procurement process and ensuring that it had been properly and rigorously completed in accordance with the public private partnership guidelines and general procurement rules.

In that review, my Department found that the proposed waste to energy project came within the predetermined affordability cap and the public sector benchmark, meaning that its delivery via public private partnership is more efficient than other alternatives.

Waste Management.

Jimmy Deenihan

Ceist:

66 Mr. Deenihan asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government his views on the introduction of resource recovery units as part of the waste management policy of his Department; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22542/06]

National policy on waste management is based on the internationally accepted waste hierarchy. This places the prevention and minimisation of waste at the top of the hierarchy followed by reuse and recycling, with energy recovery from waste preferred to the least environmentally desirable outcome of landfilling. In line with this approach, my Department is actively supporting local authorities who have the statutory responsibility for waste management planning in Ireland.

The National Waste Prevention Programme being run by the Environmental Protection Agency includes grant aiding pilot local authority demonstration projects on waste prevention. Regulations introduced to implement individual waste stream recovery such as those on packaging waste, waste electrical and electronic equipment and end-of-life vehicles also encourage waste prevention and reuse.

In addition, significant grant aid is made available to local authorities to co-fund recycling facilities, including material recovery facilities, bring banks and civic amenity sites. Some €90m has been committed since 2002 in this regard. The impact of this can be seen in our national recycling rate which had grown to almost 34% by 2004, the latest year for which data is available.

There is also scope for other initiatives to further facilitate the public in reaching our ambitious national targets in regard to recycling and diversion of waste from landfill. Materials unwanted by individuals, households or businesses should where possible be seen as a resource capable of being further used. A contribution to this approach can be made by resource recovery mechanisms.

The Dublin region has identified resource recovery as an objective of its regional waste management plan and my Department understands that, led by Dublin City Council, a web based system is now being developed to facilitate the exchange of material, e.g. unwanted furniture which might otherwise become a waste, between individuals and households. I very much welcome such initiatives and urge other local authorities to support such developments which can complement the very extensive network of recycling facilities now being put in place.

Species Action Plans.

Jan O'Sullivan

Ceist:

67 Ms O’Sullivan asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the steps he intends to take in relation to the threatened extinction of the pearl mussel; if his attention has been drawn to the fact that the water quality is in serious decline in the last nine rivers where the species exist; and his plans to tackle the eutrophication of these nine river sites and in particular to tackle the over-use of phosphates and nitrates in these areas. [22490/06]

There are two types of freshwater pearl mussel in Ireland, one of which (Margaritifera durrovensis) is unique to a short stretch of the River Nore. The other (Margaritifera margaritifera) is more widespread. My Department has designated nineteen special areas of conservation for freshwater pearl mussel species.

Freshwater pearl mussels demand the highest level of water quality, and even slight deterioration jeopardises their future. Monitoring shows that none of the known Irish populations are in a favourable conservation status. This reflects the common position across Europe, although Ireland has one of the best surviving populations of freshwater pearl mussels in Europe. The current population declines and low breeding success are being caused by a general failure of water quality to meet the exacting demands of the species.

A captive breeding programme for the Nore pearl mussel is being supported by my Department and the National Roads Authority. This draws on experience gained in captive breeding of freshwater pearl mussels in Northern Ireland, and if these measures should prove successful, it is envisaged that they will be applied to other freshwater pearl mussel populations.

An all-Island Species Action Plan for freshwater pearl mussels is being prepared in consultation with the authorities in Northern Ireland, where similar problems are being faced. Guidelines for forestry operations in freshwater pearl mussel catchments will go to public consultation shortly. My Department and Coillte are carrying out research in the Owenriff River, Co. Galway, in an effort to come up with scientifically based management measures to ensure that forestry operations on peat do not cause problems for freshwater pearl mussels in that river.

Under the Water Framework Directive, it is mandatory that the water quality standards required for the freshwater pearl mussel be achieved at least within special areas of conservation designated for the species. My Department is working to develop appropriate standards and protocols to meet this requirement.

Planning Issues.

Simon Coveney

Ceist:

68 Mr. Coveney asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the results on a planning authority basis of his Department’s survey of planning authorities regarding their policy on attaching planning conditions relating to management companies in housing developments; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22516/06]

Final compilation is being completed in my Department of detailed information received from planning authorities on their policy on attaching planning conditions relating to management companies. I will forward this information to the Deputy shortly.

Some 90% of respondents have indicated that they do attach conditions to planning permissions requiring management companies in the case of apartment developments and a large majority also indicated that they attach such conditions for mixed developments of apartments and houses but only for the communal areas relating to the apartments. In relation to estates comprising of houses only, about 40% of respondents do on occasion attach conditions regarding management companies to such estates. However these planning authorities have stated, in the main, that it is not their general policy to attach such conditions to housing estates and that they only do so in very specific circumstances for example:

• holiday Home Developments;

• if a local authority service is not available e.g. water and sewerage;

• if the developer indicates that they do not wish the development to be taken in charge; or

• a specific service or facility for residents use only such as a playground.

As I have stated previously, the related issues of planning conditions regarding management companies and taking in charge are quite complex, particularly in the newer mixed estates which contain apartments, duplex houses and terraced houses, with shared facilities such as car-parking and gardens. My Department is at present updating the residential density guidelines following on the publication of the Housing Policy Framework: Building Sustainable Communities, last December. It will be appropriate to examine further the issues of taking in charge and management companies in this context.

Question No. 69 answered with QuestionNo. 61.

EU Directives.

Mary Upton

Ceist:

70 Dr. Upton asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the steps he has taken to ensure that Ireland will not be liable to pay fines under the EU Habitats Directive in relation to the failure to protect endangered species. [22491/06]

The European Communities (Natural Habitats) (Amendment) Regulations 2005 were made in response to a case taken against Ireland by the European Commission, (Case C-183/05), which related to the Commission's concerns that Ireland's transposition of the Habitats Directive was in some respects inadequate. Ireland also presented to the European Court of Justice the wide range of monitoring schemes and active measures that are being taken to address the needs of Annex IV species.

The Commission accepted that the new regulations answered their legislative concerns regarding transposition, and accordingly withdrew that aspect of their case against Ireland. The case, however, proceeded on the basis of the Commission's concerns about Ireland's operation of derogation procedures under the Directive and their view that surveillance and specific measures were, to date, insufficient. This has been strongly contested by Ireland at the Court and extensive material including scientific reports have been presented in corroboration of Ireland's defence.

In the meantime, the practice relating to the granting of derogation licences (e.g. for the disturbance of bat colonies in the course of road construction) has been comprehensively reviewed in the light of the arguments made by the Commission, and as a result, a more structured and rigorous procedure has now been put in place, with a strong emphasis on effective mitigation measures. In addition, progress is being made in the preparation of additional species action plans that address the conservation needs of Annex IV species.

All submissions in this case to the European Court of Justice have been made and the Court's judgment is awaited. The question of fines does not arise at this stage.

Archaeological Sites.

Paul Nicholas Gogarty

Ceist:

71 Mr. Gogarty asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if he will provide this Deputy with copies of any significant reports or correspondence that he has received outlining the archaeological value of the Thornton lands in north County Dublin that have been proposed for a new prison; and his Department’s involvement in the work. [22578/06]

My Department has granted licences for certain archaeological investigations at Thornton. Three licences for geophysical testing have been issued: to archaeologists working on behalf of a local group and to archaeologists working for the Irish Prison Service. One test excavation licence has also been granted to facilitate work to be undertaken on behalf of Irish Prison Service.

The reports on the geophysical testing have been received and are available for inspection at the offices of the Archaeological Survey of Ireland, 6 Ely Place, Dublin 2.

Question No. 72 answered with QuestionNo. 60.

Library Projects.

Paul Kehoe

Ceist:

73 Mr. Kehoe asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if he will make a statement on the way in which he will improve public libraries here; and if he will allocate more resources to them in 2006. [22571/06]

The provision and funding of the public library service is a function of the individual library authorities. Grant aid is provided by my Department to local authorities and An Chomhairle Leabharlanna in respect of the development of the library and archive service including on-line services in libraries. In 2006, the provision in my Department's Vote for this programme is €12.32 million.

Election Management System.

Thomas P. Broughan

Ceist:

74 Mr. Broughan asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the contingency plans which are in place to recycle or otherwise dispose of the electronic voting machines in the event of an unfavourable report from the Commission on Electronic Voting on their suitability for use; the contingency plans which are in place; if he intends to use the machines in the event of a favourable report from the Commission on Electronic Voting; the election at which he would intend that the electronic voting machines would be used if the CEV reports favourably; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22506/06]

Joe Sherlock

Ceist:

79 Mr. Sherlock asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if e-voting machines have been examined for signs of rust or damage since they were put into storage; if the security seals have been checked on each machine; when they were last checked; if security seals were broken; the percentage of the machines which are still in a usable condition; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22501/06]

Joe Sherlock

Ceist:

129 Mr. Sherlock asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government when he would expect to have a Government decision on the use or not of electronic voting in the future; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22502/06]

Pat Rabbitte

Ceist:

139 Mr. Rabbitte asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the number of e-voting machine storage facilities which are the subject of long-term lease agreements between the State and the owners of such facilities; the locations of each of these facilities; the length of time each agreement lasts; and the amount the State is liable to pay per annum in respect of these agreements in the event of the Government deciding to abandon electronic voting. [22500/06]

Bernard J. Durkan

Ceist:

153 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if efforts have been made to dispose of the electronic voting technology and appliances by sale or tender; if there have been inquiries from other jurisdictions in this regard; if it is possible to realise the expenditure to date from any such sale; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22462/06]

Bernard J. Durkan

Ceist:

454 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the nature, extent and cost of the ongoing testing and evaluation of the e-voting technology; the number of staff and work hours dedicated to the project; if it is intended to incur further expenditure on the system and for what purpose; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22826/06]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 74, 79, 129, 139, 153 and 454 together.

A programme of further assessment, testing and validation of the electronic voting and counting system is underway to address issues raised by the Commission on Electronic Voting and demonstrate that the system operates reliably, securely and accurately. As part of this programme, my Department engaged consultants in July 2005 to undertake a security and risk assessment of all aspects of the system and to devise a programme of additional testing. The consultancy work, costing €92,300 (excluding VAT), is well underway and will be completed as soon as possible.

The timing of the further use of the system is dependent on the progress made with this work and the ongoing work of the Commission on Electronic Voting, the associated decisions arising in this regard, and the dates at which future polls may be held. My Department has had no approach from other jurisdictions in relation to this matter on the lines referred to in Question No. 153.

My Department's Franchise Section is responsible for a range of matters relating to the electoral system, including implementation of the electronic voting and counting system. At present, three staff in the Section work on, inter alia, matters relating to the system.

Responsibility for the security and safe storage of manual voting equipment (such as ballot boxes, stamping instruments, and stationery) is a matter for Returning Officers, who are statutorily responsible for conducting the polls. Accordingly, similar responsibility was assigned to them in relation to the storage of the electronic voting machines and equipment. The electronic voting machines do not require maintenance on an ongoing basis.

The following table sets out information provided by Returning Officers regarding storage arrangements entered into by them in each of the 25 locations involved. While I have requested my Department to examine the question of centralised storage of the voting machines, it would not be appropriate to comment at this stage on detailed costs that might be involved in the buy-out of leases given the commercial considerations involved.

Constituency

Location of Storage Premises

Duration of Lease

Carlow-Kilkenny

Mortarstown

2 years

Cavan-Monaghan

Monaghan Town

25 years

Clare

Ennis

Monthly basis

Cork City

Ballygarvan

10 years

Cork County

Togher

Annual basis

Donegal

Letterkenny

Annual basis

Dublin City

Ballycoolin

8 years

Dublin County

Finglas

Annual basis

Galway

Galway City

N/A (Voting Machines stored in the courthouse)

Kerry

Tralee

10 years

Kildare

Clane

9 years 9 months with 5 year break clause

Laois-Offaly

Portlaoise

5 years

Limerick

Limerick City

4 years 9 months

Longford

Longford Town

4 years 9 months

Roscommon

Roscommon Town

2 years 6 months

Louth

Dundalk

N/A (Town council premises)

Mayo

Castlebar

Annual basis

Meath

Navan

9 years 9 months

Sligo

Sligo Town

N/A (Voting Machines stored in the courthouse)

Leitrim

Carrick on Shannon

1 year

Tipperary (N & S)

Clonmel

5 years

Waterford

Waterford City

10 years

Westmeath

Mullingar

4 years 9 months

Wexford

Drinagh

Monthly basis

Wicklow

Kilcoole

Annual basis

Nuclear Plants.

Willie Penrose

Ceist:

75 Mr. Penrose asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government his views on raising the privatisation of British nuclear fuels at EU level. [22448/06]

The decision by the United Kingdom Government to approve the sale of British Nuclear Group Sellafield Ltd. (BNG) was made in the context of the Strategy document published on 30 March 2006 by the UK's Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA). This Strategy outlines how the NDA proposes to tackle the decommissioning and clean up of the 20 nuclear sites, including Sellafield, over which they have control.

This restructuring was considered at EU level when an investigation was launched by the EU Commission under Article 88(2) of the EU Treaty. The investigation considered whether the transfer of the assets and liabilities of the British Nuclear Group to the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority complied with EU rules on State Aids. The Commission announced on 4 April 2006 that the transfer was in compliance because British Nuclear Group was deemed to have met the principle that the ‘polluter pays'. It is not clear that the particular issue of the privatisation of the British Nuclear Group would attract further interest at EU level.

Our concerns regarding the privatisation of BNG relate to the potential impact on safety at Sellafield and risks that could be posed to Ireland. We consider that the activities of privatised companies involved in the nuclear industry require close scrutiny and coordination, to ensure that safety is not compromised in pursuit of profit. I raised specific concerns about the use of private contractors in the industry when I met the Chairman and the Chief Executive of the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority in November last in Dublin. I also made clear in that meeting and in an earlier meeting with the United Kingdom Secretary of State at the Department of Trade and Industry, Mr. Alan Johnson MP, in October 2005 that the issue of safety at Sellafield must be paramount and the reduction of hazards and risks on the site must be the priority.

Regardless of the privatisation of any element of the British Nuclear apparatus, the Irish Government will continue to hold the UK Government accountable and responsible for the operation of the Sellafield Nuclear Plant. The current position whereby both the ownership of the site and control of the operations undertaken at Sellafield are the responsibility of the UK Government through the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority will continue. The UK authorities have confirmed to my Office that the privatisation of the British Nuclear Group will not alter this position.

I would like to make it very clear that we hold, and will continue to hold the UK Government accountable and responsible for the operation of the Sellafield nuclear facility. Our concerns regarding operational safety, marine discharges and the storage of large volumes of highly active waste at Sellafield remain, and as Minister I will continue to articulate these concerns clearly and consistently to the UK Government and Administration, and at appropriate opportunities, in Europe.

Housing Provision.

Caoimhghín Ó Caoláin

Ceist:

76 Caoimhghín Ó Caoláin asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the proposals contained in the housing material of the National Development Plan which have been or are being drafted by his Department including details regarding the priorities for investment in housing contained in that material. [22478/06]

Arthur Morgan

Ceist:

116 Mr. Morgan asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the targets in respect of social housing his Department is proposing should be included in the new National Development Plan 2007 to 2013. [22474/06]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 76 and 116 together.

The preparation of the National Development Plan 2007-2013 (NDP) is being coordinated by the Department of Finance and a high level steering group, chaired by that Department and comprising senior officials of other relevant Departments, has been established to oversee drafting. The housing material of the NDP is being drafted by my Department and while the final content and focus of the overall Plan will be a matter for decision by Government, priorities for investment in housing will take account of a number of factors — including the key policy challenges highlighted by the NESC report, the results of the 2005 Housing Needs Assessment and the policy framework set out in the document Housing Policy Framework — Building Sustainable Communities which was launched in December 2005.

Bernard J. Durkan

Ceist:

77 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the number of local authority houses expected to be built in 2006; the extent to which this is likely to meet the need as defined in the housing waiting lists throughout the country; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22463/06]

The most recent assessment of need for social housing which was undertaken by local authorities in March 2005 indicated that there were 43,684 households on local authority waiting lists compared with 48,413 in March 2002 — a decrease of almost 10%.

I recently informed local authorities of their financial allocations for their local authority housing programmes and have urged them to accelerate progress on the implementation of their housing programmes in order to commence construction and secure completion on as many social housing schemes as possible in 2006. The total allocation for 2006 is €942 million. This should allow for the completion of over 5,000 housing units in 2006. In December 2005, the Government launched a new Housing Policy Framework: Building Sustainable Communities which outlines key principles underpinning housing policy and investment over the coming years. Substantial increased investment in social and affordable housing is outlined in the framework. This will allow for some 23,000 new social homes to be commenced between 2006 and 2008; and some 15,000 affordable homes to be delivered. In total, some 50,000 households will benefit over the coming three years from an Exchequer capital investment package of close to €4 billion. Allied to this, a package of reforms is proposed to improve equity, efficiency and effectiveness. The focus is on improving community participation, improving services to ensure personal choice, autonomy and responsibility. The overall impact of these measures will impact positively on waiting lists for social and affordable housing

Greenhouse Gas Emissions.

Tom Hayes

Ceist:

78 Mr. Hayes asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if he will make a statement on his Department’s emissions trading policy. [22566/06]

Eamon Gilmore

Ceist:

101 Mr. Gilmore asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the effectiveness of the new limits on greenhouse gas production will be in helping to meet Ireland’s Kyoto targets; his views on whether the new limits are stringent enough to act as an incentive to business to reduce emissions; and if his Department or any other State body carried out research to ascertain the expected effectiveness of the new limits in encouraging businesses to reduce emissions. [22472/06]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 78 and 101 together.

Participation by Irish installations in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme, as required under Directive 2003/87/EC, is a key element of Ireland's overall approach to meeting its target for the purposes of the Kyoto Protocol. The other elements are a programme of measures to achieve emission reductions throughout the economy (as set out in the National Climate Change Strategy) and use of the Kyoto Protocol mechanisms to purchase credits arising from carbon reductions elsewhere in the world.

In relation to the next trading period (2008-2012) under the EU Scheme, the Government has decided that the trading installations in Ireland will be allocated just over 23 million allowances per annum over the five years. This is equivalent to 88% of their projected emissions on a business as usual basis. The allocation by the Government was informed by independent analysis of projections and cost-effective emission-reduction measures available to the sector carried out by ICF Consulting and Byrne Ó Cléirigh. A copy of the consultants' report Determining the Share of National Greenhouse Gas Emissions for Emissions Trading in Ireland 2008-2012 is available on my Department's website www.environ.ie. The emission reductions to be made by the trading sector in Ireland in the 2008-2012 period are equivalent to about 3 million tonnes or some 42% of our projected distance to its target under the Kyoto Protocol.

I am satisfied that this allocation achieves an appropriate balance between the important environmental objectives involved and the need to protect the competitiveness of the economy.

Question No. 79 answered with QuestionNo. 74.

Nuclear Plants.

Emmet Stagg

Ceist:

80 Mr. Stagg asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if he intends to meet with the Northern Secretary, Mr. Hain, with a view to receiving a solemn commitment that no nuclear power plant will be built on the island of Ireland under the UK energy review. [22445/06]

Jack Wall

Ceist:

107 Mr. Wall asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government when he intends to raise the UK energy review, and the possibility of additional nuclear power plants being built in the UK, with like minded countries on the nuclear issue within the EU. [22446/06]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 80 and 107 together.

Together with my colleague, the Minister for Foreign Affairs, I met with the Northern Secretary, Mr. Peter Hain at a meeting of the British — Irish Council on 2 June. We took the opportunity to emphasise that the Irish Government would be strongly opposed to the building of any nuclear plants on the island of Ireland. The Northern Secretary responded, acknowledging that there was no support, North or South, for sitting a nuclear power plant on the island of Ireland.

The United Kingdom is currently considering its future energy needs and reviewing its capacity to meet them. As part of this Energy Review, a consultation document was launched on 23 January 2006 by the UK Minister of State for Energy. Entitled Our Energy Challenge: Securing Clean Affordable Energy for the Long Term, this document states that the review will consider whether nuclear power should continue to be part of the mix of energy supplies for the UK in the future. While the review is not yet complete, Prime Minister Blair has clearly indicated his view that nuclear new build in the UK should remain very much on the agenda.

My Department, in conjunction with the Radiological Protection Institute of Ireland engaged in the consultation process relating to the Review. The submission made, which covered a number of issues of concern to Ireland, reiterated the Government's strong opposition to nuclear in general and to the siting of any nuclear plants on the island of Ireland in particular. We are monitoring the progress of the UK Review closely.

In regard to the European dimension, the Green Paper on a European Energy policy published by the European Commission in March recognises that each Member State will have to meet its energy needs in accordance with choices based on its own national preferences and taking into account sustainability, competitiveness, energy efficiency and security of supply. This applies to Ireland which is non-nuclear and to all other Member States, some of whom, like the UK, choose to pursue the nuclear power option.

Ireland co-operates on a regular basis in the EU with countries who are like-minded on the nuclear issue and will continue to do so. However, the issues arising for Ireland in relation to decisions taken in the UK on nuclear issues are of significantly greater concern to Ireland because we share the Irish Sea and are close neighbours.

Social and Affordable Housing.

Shane McEntee

Ceist:

81 Mr. McEntee asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if he will make a statement on the progress on Part 5 of the Housing Act 1988 on a county basis. [22564/06]

I assume that the Question relates to Part V of the Planning and Development Act 2000 — 2004. Information on the number of housing units acquired under Part V is published in my Department's Housing Statistics Bulletins, copies of which are available in the Oireachtas Library and on the Department's website at www.environ.ie.

I am satisfied that Part V is operational in all planning authorities and that output is gathering momentum as evidenced by the statistics.

Housing Grants.

Liam Twomey

Ceist:

82 Dr. Twomey asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if he will introduce a grant system to tackle radon gas in domestic dwellings; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22572/06]

Jack Wall

Ceist:

98 Mr. Wall asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the reason he is opposed to the provision of assistance to elderly people to carry out radon remediation work to their homes through either the essential repairs grants scheme or the housing aid for the elderly scheme; and if he will reconsider his opposition to same. [22447/06]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 82 and 98 together.

Government efforts and resources, together with those of the Radiological Protection Institute of Ireland (RPII), focus on highlighting public awareness of radon and on improving information to householders so as to enable and encourage them to address monitoring or remedial requirements effectively and economically.

Increasing the awareness of the public is considered to be a more effective approach than the provision of State financial assistance schemes to householders for radon testing of their homes or for radon remediation works. Such schemes of assistance are not operated by the majority of EU Member States. The Government, therefore, does not propose to reconsider including radon remediation measures as qualifying under the essential repairs grants or the Housing Aid for the Elderly schemes.

The Government, largely through the RPII, has for many years committed significant resources to assessing the extent of the radon problem throughout the country and to highlighting public awareness of radon and the health risks associated with prolonged exposure to high radon concentrations. Householders, particularly those in high radon areas, have been strongly encouraged to have their homes tested for radon and to undertake radon remediation works where necessary.

As part of its campaign to further enhance public awareness of radon, the RPII, in late 2004, began a nationwide series of public information seminars on radon, targeted at high radon areas. So far, seminars have been held in Sligo, Kilkenny, Waterford, Ballina and Tralee. These seminars have received widespread media coverage and have generated a large number of enquiries from the public. The RPII have visited Clonmel this year and also plan to visit Carlow and Galway.

Recent research commissioned by the RPII has found that 75% of the general population are aware of radon. In addition, over the past two years, there has been a significant increase in the number of radon measurements undertaken by householders compared with previous years.

If the household is found to have high radon levels, remediation work may be recommended. Technical guidance on radon remediation techniques is available in a booklet issued by my Department called Radon in Buildings — Corrective Options which is available on my Department's website at www.environ.ie. The RPII has also issued guidance entitled Understanding Radon Remediation — A Householders' Guide. This is available on the RPII website, as is a list of companies who can provide a radon remediation service and can offer specific advice and recommendations.

In addition, my Department, in June 1997, introduced upgraded building regulations which required all new houses which commenced construction on or after 1 July 1998 to incorporate radon protection measures at the time of construction.

Local Authority Regulations.

Enda Kenny

Ceist:

83 Mr. Kenny asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if he intends to amend staff regulations for certain graded employees of local authorities and vocational educational committees to stand for election or be co-opted as members of local authorities; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22539/06]

The provisions governing local authority membership and local authority employment are set out in sections 13 and 161 of the Local Government Act 2001. Under section 13 of the Act, a person employed by a local authority who is not the holder of a class, description or grade of employment designated by order under section 161 is disqualified from being elected or co-opted to, or from being a member of, a local authority.

For the purposes of the Local Government Act 2001 (Section 161) Order 2004, designated employments are employments whose maximum remuneration does not exceed the maximum remuneration for the post of Clerical Officer (Grade 3) in a local authority. There are no proposals to alter this position. The position in relation to employees of vocational educational committees is a matter for the Minister for Education and Science.

Social and Affordable Housing.

Liz McManus

Ceist:

84 Ms McManus asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the steps he intends to take to increase the social and affordable housing stock in view of the fact that rent supplement, which was designed to be a temporary solution for housing individual families, has become a social housing programme that is clearly not working and is not benefiting those affected by the housing crisis. [22485/06]

The new Housing Policy Framework: Building Sustainable Communities launched by Government last December provides for further increases in the investment in social and affordable housing programmes. Exchequer capital resources provided to my Department for these programmes for the period 2006 to 2008 stand at almost €4 billion, over 20% higher than the previous three years, and this sum increases to over €6.5 billion when non-voted and current spending provisions are included. This money will be invested in response to identified need. It is expected that in the region of (23,000) new units of social housing will be commenced and 15,000 units of affordable housing delivered over the period. Further households will be assisted through the new Rental Accommodation Scheme (RAS) which is an additional form of social housing established to provide for those rent supplement recipients with a long-term housing need. In total, I expect some 50,000 households to benefit from various social and affordable housing measures over the coming three years.

Liam Twomey

Ceist:

85 Dr. Twomey asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if he will make a statement on the EBS report on affordable housing issued in June 2006. [22563/06]

Aengus Ó Snodaigh

Ceist:

128 Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government in view of the fact, there is a real probability that mortgage interest rates will continue to increase over the coming 18 months, his views on the findings of the affordability index produced by EBS Building Society and DKM Economic Consultants on 6 June 2006 which found that mortgages State wide cost 27 per cent of earnings on average, with first-time buyers in Dublin spending 32 per cent of their income on repayments. [22482/06]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 85 and 128 together.

I refer to the reply to Questions Nos. 53 and 55 on today's order paper.

Local Government Reform.

David Stanton

Ceist:

86 Mr. Stanton asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government his plans regarding the reform of local government structures; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22470/06]

I refer to the reply to Question No. 558 of 3 May 2006 in relation to the local government reform programme.

A number of new structures have been introduced in recent years as part of the programme to provide an enhanced role for elected members in policy formulation and review and in developing and implementing an integrated strategy for the economic, social and cultural development of their areas. This role is now undertaken in partnership with representatives of the sectoral interests through the local authority Strategic Policy Committees (SPCs) and the local government led County/City Development Boards (CDBs) respectively. Following a review of the SPCs, a number of recommendations were made to improve their performance and these are at present being implemented at local authority level. In addition, CDBs have at my request, just completed a review of their strategies in order to ensure that they remained focused on delivering a select number of key priorities over the following three years. The review concentrated on integrative actions aimed at a more joined-up approach to local service delivery, involving the member agencies on the Board.

A new structure in the form of joint local authority — Garda policing committees will be introduced into local government over the next few months. These new committees will be launched shortly, initially on a pilot basis. The committees will introduce a partnership process involving local elected members, An Garda Síochána, Oireachtas members, community representatives and local authority management which can collectively consult, discuss and make recommendations on matters affecting the policing of local areas.

My focus has been on intensifying and consolidating the gains made through the extensive local government modernisation programme of recent years. While much has been achieved, I am anxious that momentum be maintained and further progress made in delivering, modern, effective and customer focused service delivery by local authorities to their communities.

Waste Management.

John Deasy

Ceist:

87 Mr. Deasy asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the result of checks his Department has made into the operation of the plastic bag levy; if there is significant avoidance of the charge by some retail outlets; if so, the action he intends to take; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22548/06]

The 15 cent levy on plastic bags, as provided for in the Waste Management (Environmental Levy) (Plastic Bag) Regulations 2001, applies to all plastic bags supplied to customers at the point of sale to them for the conveyance of goods or products. Prior to the introduction of this levy in March 2002, an estimated 1.2 billion plastic bags were given away free by retailers. The levy has led to a dramatic reduction in use of plastic bags with a consequent positive environmental benefit. Plastic shopping bags accounted for 5% of litter arising prior to the introduction of the levy, but for just 0.22% of litter arising in 2004.

I am anxious that the plastic bag regulations are rigorously enforced. From representations I have received there would appear to be some anecdotal evidence of slippage in application of the levy. I recognise the need to ensure that the efforts and commitment of the vast majority of retailers are not undermined by the non-compliance of a few. Therefore, my Department has written to local authorities asking them to carry out inspections of retail outlets with a view to improving current practices in relation to the implementation of the Plastic Bag Levy Regulations. An enforcement network of local authority officers has been established to monitor and co-ordinate the enforcement drive.

The relevant enforcement officers have extensive powers to enter any retail premises, to conduct any searches or investigations considered necessary, and to inspect or remove any records, books and documents for the purposes of any proceedings in relation to the levy.

All complaints received in my Department concerning non-compliance are forwarded to the relevant local authority and the Revenue Commissioners. The operation of the levy is also subject to the normal Revenue Commissioners auditing arrangements.

Housing Provision.

Ciarán Cuffe

Ceist:

88 Mr. Cuffe asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government his views on reports (details supplied) that major housing developments in the Greater Dublin area could face delays of several years due to inadequate water supplies; and if he will comment on the issue. [22574/06]

Responsibility for the provision of water supplies to service existing requirements and new development needs rests with the local authorities. Local authorities are required to undertake regular assessments of their water services capital requirements and to inform my Department of the resulting priorities. My Department funds those schemes that are approved under the Water Services Investment Programme on the basis of infrastructural priorities identified by individual authorities.

In the case of Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown County Council, I have included all such identified requirements in the Water Services Investment Programme 2005 — 2007 published late last year and available in the Oireachtas Library. The schemes in the Programme are being advanced as quickly as possible. With regard to proposed housing development in the area referred to, I understand that, in advance of any significant planning applications being considered, Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown County Council is currently preparing a Local Area Plan that will be subject to public consultation and, in due course, adoption by the elected Council.

All local authorities have again recently been asked by my Department to produce new assessments of needs and to submit the results to the Department by 31 July 2006. This will afford Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown County Council an opportunity to identify any additional infrastructural needs in its area as an input to future phases of the Water Services Investment Programme.

As far as the Greater Dublin Area (including Meath, Kildare and Wicklow) is concerned, a range of schemes to increase water supply capacity is being advanced under the Water Services Investment Programme 2005 — 2007. These include Kildare Wellfield Development, Leixlip Water Treatment Plant Extension, Navan Water Supply Scheme, Wicklow Town Water Supply Scheme and the expansion of the Ballymore Eustace Water Treatment Plant. The Ballymore Eustace scheme will increase capacity by a further 44 million litres per day. A recently completed interim upgrade to the plant has already secured a 22 million litres per day increase.

A further allocation of €118.3m has been provided under the 2005 to 2007 Programme for the rehabilitation of defective and unserviceable water mains in the Dublin region as part of a national water conservation sub-programme. I understand that Dublin City Council, acting as lead authority, has appointed consultants to produce contract documents and to oversee the implementation of the relevant works in the region. In addition, the Programme also includes funding to support the identification of new water sources to meet projected demand in the Greater Dublin Area up to 2031.

I am satisfied that these projects will ensure adequate water supplies to deal with current and future development requirements in the region.

Planning Issues.

John Gormley

Ceist:

89 Mr. Gormley asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government his views on the lack of consistency between planning authorities on the question of whether solar panels require planning permission is hindering uptake of the technology and if he will consider issuing planning guidelines setting out the conditions in which the installation of solar panels is exempt from planning permission. [22580/06]

Many domestic renewable energy developments, including the placing of solar panels to the rear of houses, would be exempted development. Section 4(1)(h) of the Planning and Development Act 2000, provides that development consisting of the carrying out of works for the maintenance, improvement or other alteration of any structure is exempted development if the works affect only the interior of the structure or do not materially affect the external appearance of the structure so as to render the appearance inconsistent with the character of the structure or of neighbouring structures. I have also asked my Department to review the exempted development regulations to ensure that they support the use of renewable energy for domestic and small business users.

There has been a very high level of interest in the Greener Homes grant aid package for individual domestic householders which was launched by the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources on 27 March this year. In the eight week period since the scheme was launched Sustainable Energy Ireland (SEI) has received 500 applications for grant aid for solar panels.

Recycling Policy.

Michael D. Higgins

Ceist:

90 Mr. M. Higgins asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the percentage and volume of recycled cardboard and plastic waste that is shipped from Ireland to China on an annual basis; his plans on whether a closer or indigenous solution to the recycling of these materials would be preferable; and the efforts he is making to explore this option. [22494/06]

National waste statistics for all waste streams are published at three-yearly intervals by the Environmental Protection Agency with the most recent National Waste Report being in respect of 2004. As outlined in successive National Waste Reports, the general situation in Ireland is that we rely significantly on foreign based materials recycling infrastructure, which dealt with 73.8% of recycled waste in 2004. Europe accounts for almost 92% of all recyclable waste exported from Ireland for further treatment with the remaining 8% exported to the Asian continent for reprocessing. In 2004, of the 375,597 tonnes of paper and cardboard recovered, 18,358 tonnes, or 4.9%, was exported to China while 118,358 tonnes, or 31.5%, was recycled in Ireland. Of the 55,904 tonnes of plastic recovered in the same year, 7,100 tonnes, or 12.7%, was exported to China while 8,718 tonnes, or 15.6%, was recycled in Ireland.

While there has been recent progress in the provision of more infrastructure within Ireland to process materials recovered for recycling, for example, in the development of new facilities to process waste electrical and electronic equipment, it should be noted that clean segregated materials are a sought after resource which are freely traded under EU and international law. This is supported by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Decision of C(92)39 Final on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Wastes Destined for Recovery Operations which notes that the recovery of valuable materials and energy from wastes is an integral part of the international economic system and that well established markets exist for, and can contribute to, the collection and processing of such materials within OECD member countries.

While international trade in waste is consistent with Government policy insofar as it supports improved performance in recycling, the Government also recognises the value of developing markets for recyclates in Ireland. To this end, a Market Development Group was established in 2004 and has been working on the development of a National Market Development Programme. The implementation of the Programme will play an important role in achieving targets for further progress in the recovery and recycling of paper and cardboard as set out in the National Strategy on Biodegradable Waste from the 2004 level of just under 46% to 67% by 2016. Sub-committees have been established by the Market Development Group to deal specifically with market development for both recovered paper waste and for plastics. It is intended to publish the National Market Development Programme later this year.

My Department has also been working with the Department of the Environment in Northern Ireland with a view to developing all-island market development strategies. Both Departments have co-funded an all-island paper mill study which has been completed and will be published shortly. The outcome of this study will inform future policy and make an important contribution to the knowledge base in relation to the consumption and demand of paper products within Ireland, as well as the sources, volumes and market potential of recovered paper.

Environmental Management.

Brendan Howlin

Ceist:

91 Mr. Howlin asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the steps he intends to take to halt the decline in Ireland’s biodiversity by the 2010 target date; and if he intends to initiate new approaches to environmental management. [22489/06]

My Department is undertaking an extensive programme of work aimed at meeting the target of halting the loss of biodiversity by 2010.

Ireland's strategy for conserving and, where possible, enhancing our biodiversity is set out in the National Biodiversity Plan 2002-2006. An important feature of the Plan is the shared responsibility across all sectors, including Government Departments, State Agencies and the Local Authorities, for the implementation of Plan. An Inter-Departmental Steering Group is in place to oversee its implementation and an interim review in 2005 demonstrated significant progress.

At the launch of the Interim Review in November last, I announced 13 additional initiatives to support the ongoing implementation of the National Biodiversity Plan and, of course, Ireland's efforts to meet the 2010 target. These 13 initiatives were as follows:

•the establishment in my Department of a dedicated Biodiversity Unit;

•the establishment of a Biodiversity Fund of €1m, spread over the two year period 2006-2007. This fund provides grants to capital projects aimed at conserving and enhancing Ireland's biodiversity (over 100 applications were received for the 2006 round of grants, with 38 projects already approved for funding);

•the establishment of a Biodiversity Forum, which has already met and will provide independent monitoring of implementation of the National Biodiversity Plan and assist in the drafting of future national strategies on biodiversity;

•the establishment of a Biological Records Centre, which will be an essential mechanism and resource for documentation, monitoring and research in the area of Biodiversity;

•the completion, by the National Platform on Biological Research, of a Biodiversity Knowledge Programme for Ireland (this has now been finalised and published);

•the commissioning of specific research on the quantification of the economic and social benefits of biodiversity to society as a whole (a tender for this research is currently being prepared by my Department);

•preparation, and a move now to the implementation phase, of all-island Species Action Plans for the Irish Hare, the Pollan, the Corncrake and the Irish Lady's Tresses Orchid, as well as of an all-island study on Invasive Alien Species;

•drafting of a Biodiversity Undertaking which I have asked all Government Departments to publish and implement. The Undertaking addresses the proactive and biodiversity-friendly management of buildings and lands;

•issue of Guidelines by my Department for the production of Local Biodiversity Action Plans to all Local Authorities (a follow-up Seminar on the production of Local Biodiversity Action Plans will take place in July);

•funding by my Department of a dedicated public awareness programme on biodiversity and its importance to human well-being (a tender for the contract is being prepared by my Department at present and the Biodiversity Forum will also have a role in this campaign);

•successful promotion by me within the EU Council of Environment Ministers to have the Malahide Message, which was elaborated under Ireland's EU Presidency, strongly integrated into the Review of the EC's Biodiversity Strategy (the EU has recently issued a Communication and an associated Action Plan on meeting the 2010 target, which has particular regard to the Malahide Message);

•conversion to biofuels of the 160-strong fleet of the National Parks and Wildlife Service of my Department within a two-year period.

As outlined above, significant progress is being made in creating a framework to enable us to meet the 2010 target to halt the loss of biodiversity.

With regard to the initiation of new approaches to environmental management, under the EU Habitat and Birds Directives my Department has identified 420 candidate Special Areas of Conservation and 128 Special Protection Areas for Birds, covering some 11.5 % of the landmass of the State. My Department is currently working with landowners and other stakeholders to prepare Management Plans for each SAC and SPA to protect the integrity of these important sites, based on best practice approaches to environmental management. To date, 34 such Plans have completed the consultation phase and are now being implemented.

Water Meters.

John Perry

Ceist:

92 Mr. Perry asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if he will request local authorities to introduce a single charge only for county council installed water meters where landowners have split land holdings; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22546/06]

In accordance with the EU Water Framework Directive, the national water services pricing policy framework provides for the recovery by sanitary authorities of the full cost of providing water services from the users of these services, with the exception of households using the services for domestic purposes. This policy of cost recovery from the non-domestic sector extends to the provision of meters, which are necessary to ensure water charging of users according to actual consumption.

Local authorities are at an advanced stage of implementing their non domestic metering programmes and will have substantially concluded these by end 2006. The metering of non-domestic water supply is also intended to incentivise all non-domestic users, including the farming community, to manage and conserve their use of water.

My Department is aware that in some situations non-domestic users, including farmers may need to have a number of separate meters installed on their property. Precise charging arrangements in these circumstances would be a matter for settlement locally between property owners and local authorities. However, in principle the costs associated with the provision of water supply, including the installation of water meters, should be met by the users of the service.

EU Directives.

Kathleen Lynch

Ceist:

93 Ms Lynch asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if the most recent proposals submitted to the European Commission in relation to the EU Nitrates Directive will allow for an increase in the amount of nitrate spread on land here; and the way in which he will ensure that these proposals will not result in a decline in water quality. [22495/06]

Denis Naughten

Ceist:

122 Mr. Naughten asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the status of the Nitrates Directive; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22314/06]

Denis Naughten

Ceist:

125 Mr. Naughten asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government when he intends to enforce the Nitrates Directive; the status of the derogation; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22315/06]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 93, 122 and 125 together.

Ireland's national Nitrates Action Programme has been given statutory effect by the European Communities (Good Agricultural Practice for Protection of Waters) Regulations 2005 which came in to effect generally on 1 February 2006. Some aspects of the Regulations are at present under review on the basis of scientific advice received subsequent to the making of the Regulations. Proposals for amending Regulations were sent to the EU Commission on 18 May 2006. The proposals include a number of new measures to address issues identified in certain areas, while ensuring that the overriding need for adequate protection of water quality will not be undermined. The proposed new measures include:

—a transition period to benefit pig, poultry and mushroom producers

—the introduction of a transition period for REPS farmers

—changes to the nitrogen Index system for tillage crops

—a newly-defined phosphorus Index 3 for grassland

—a reduction in the number of stocking-rate bands for both phosphorus and nitrogen grassland fertilisation limits, and

—an increase in the nitrogen limit for grassland for the majority of farmers.

Representatives of my Department, the Department of Agriculture and Food and Teagasc met with Commission officials on 30 May 2006 to discuss the proposed amendments. Progress was made at this meeting but a number of issues remain to be clarified. Further information was recently sent to the Commission to facilitate further consultations. Subsequent to securing the agreement of the Commission I hope to be in a position to make new Regulations this month.

Ireland has sought the approval of the EU Commission for a derogation from 170 kg to 250 kg organic nitrogen per hectare in relation to livestock manure applied to land. While the objective had been to secure agreement of a derogation by mid-2006, consideration of the proposal is at present in abeyance pending finalisation of the proposals for amendment of the Regulations. The derogation proposal will need to be considered at future meetings of the EU Nitrates Committee before approval can be obtained.

Housing Grants.

Richard Bruton

Ceist:

94 Mr. Bruton asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if he will increase the maximum grant for the disabled persons grant; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22509/06]

Following the outcome of the review of the implementation of the disabled persons and essential repairs grant schemes, proposals for the future operation of the schemes are being prepared in my Department. I hope to be in a position to announce these shortly.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions.

Joan Burton

Ceist:

95 Ms Burton asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the reason the transport sector was not included in the carbon emissions scheme since emissions in this sector have risen considerably since 1990; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22473/06]

The transport sector is not included in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme as it is not one of the activities included in the scope of the Emissions Trading Directive. While it is possible for Member States to voluntarily include additional gases or categories of activities in the scope of the Scheme, this is constrained in practice by considerations such as the feasibility of emissions reporting, monitoring and verification given the number and size of emitters and the technical feasibility to reduce emissions.

The Government is addressing emissions from the transport sector through a variety of measures outside the emissions trading scheme, including a €205m excise relief scheme for biofuels, reduced VRT for hybrid cars and flexible fuel vehicles and provision of fuel economy labelling to influence consumer choice in vehicle purchasing decisions. In addition to these measures, significant investment has been provided for public transport under the current National Development Plan and will continue to be provided in the context of Transport 21. Further measures to reduce emissions from the transport sector are being considered in the context of the review of the National Climate Change Strategy.

National Spatial Strategy.

Tom Hayes

Ceist:

96 Mr. Hayes asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if, in view of the continuing expansion of the growth in the Dublin region, he will review the national spatial strategy; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22547/06]

The National Spatial Strategy (NSS) is a 20-year strategic planning framework which was published in November 2002 and aims at achieving more balanced regional development throughout the country. Dublin plays a key role in the ongoing implementation of the National Spatial Strategy.

The Strategy calls for a more balanced spread of economic activity in Ireland, but recognises that we must support and enhance the competitiveness of the Greater Dublin Area so that it continues to perform at the international and national level as a driver of national development. The NSS also accepts that it is not sustainable that Dublin should continue to sprawl outwards into counties on its periphery and beyond. Longer commuting times are socially detrimental and physical infrastructure constraints may jeopardise competitiveness. To address this, it is necessary to consolidate the physical growth of the Dublin metropolitan area, the city and suburbs, while at the same time concentrating development in the hinterland into strategically placed, strong and dynamic urban centres.

The substantial investment in transport that was announced by Government in Transport 21 is in accordance with the general principles of NSS and it is envisaged that future residential and commercial developments will be concentrated as close as possible to the existing and forthcoming rapid transport systems.

The Regional Planning Guidelines (RPGs) for the Greater Dublin Area 2004-2016 were prepared and adopted jointly by the Dublin and Mid-East Regional Authorities, and are in the second year of their 12-year life-span. These RPGs articulate the NSS vision for the Greater Dublin Area, and relevant city and county development plans translate the vision further to local level.

The NSS is a robust framework and continues to be appropriate and applicable. When initial results from the 2006 Census are released later this year, it is intended to consider the population trends in the context of their possible implications for the Regional Planning Guidelines, both in the Greater Dublin Area and throughout the country.

Social and Affordable Housing.

Michael Ring

Ceist:

97 Mr. Ring asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if he will initiate a new national design competition for the building industry for highly energy efficient affordable and social housing; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22536/06]

My Department considers that the design, construction and layout of new social and affordable housing is of a very high standard and that a high level of energy efficiency is being achieved in these projects. A number of housing developments which use innovative energy efficiency and environmentally friendly technologies have already been undertaken by local authorities and any further proposal of this nature will be examined by my Department from the point of view of their efficacy and value for money/cost benefit considerations. Innovative approaches of this nature are supported by my Department in cooperation with Sustainable Energy Ireland.

A new Housing Policy Framework: Building Sustainable Communities which outlines key principles underpinning housing policy and investment over the coming years was launched last December which highlights the commitment of this Government to continuing improvements in the quality of housing and neighbourhoods. A further policy statement will be published this year which will set out more detailed approaches to this issue.

Question No. 98 answered with QuestionNo. 82.

Species Action Plans.

Brendan Howlin

Ceist:

99 Mr. Howlin asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the steps he intends to take to curb the population of the grey squirrel, which is a threat to the native smaller red squirrel and to many songbirds; and his views on initiating a contraceptive programme for the grey squirrel as has been done in other countries. [22488/06]

My Department's National Parks and Wildlife Service, and the Environment and Heritage Service, Northern Ireland are currently preparing an All Ireland Species Action Plan for the protection of the Red Squirrel, similar to those already published for a number of other species.

The primary issue for the plan to address is competition with the grey squirrel and all appropriate measures will be considered, including management of forests to favour red over grey squirrels. It is planned to engage in public consultations on the draft, as in the case of previous Species Action Plans, prior to final publication later this year. The new Species Action Plan will involve a number of actions on grey squirrel control.

The Forest Service of the Department of Agriculture and Food are also currently funding a project titled "Securing Ireland's Broadleaf Forests and Conservation of Native Red Squirrels through integrated Management of Grey Squirrels". One of the primary objectives of this project is the control of the alien grey squirrel population, which, inter alia, is causing damage to forestry. The project is looking at 11 woodlands in which various methods of control are being tested.

Regarding a programme of contraceptive control, research carried out in Britain on the use of contraceptive bait on grey squirrels has showed inconclusive results. Laboratory trials initially proved promising with an immune response created in treated females. Studies progressed to enclosures large enough for squirrels to conduct their normal mating behaviour and the first trial showed a significant reduction in pregnancy rates among treated grey squirrels. Two further enclosure trials and a subsequent field trial in the wild, however, failed to produce a response that was powerful or long-lasting enough to validate the results. Accordingly the present state of knowledge would not support the establishment here of such a programme. However we are continuing to monitor research closely on this and other control technologies.

Planning Issues.

John Gormley

Ceist:

100 Mr. Gormley asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the details of his recent discussions (details supplied) with Environment Commissioner, Mr. Stavros Dimas on the issue of high levels of retrospective planning permissions and Ireland’s compliance with the Environmental Impact Assessments Directive; and his plans to introduce legislation that would reduce the levels of retrospective planning permissions. [22581/06]

A Reasoned Opinion was received from the European Commission on 5 January 2005 regarding planning enforcement procedures in relation to unauthorised developments for which Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA) are required. A formal response issued to the Commission on 8 March 2005. On 12 May the European Court of Justice advised the Government of the initiation of legal proceedings by the Commission. A Letter of Formal Notice was received from the European Commission on 4 May 2006 in relation to Ireland's implementation of the EC Directive 85/337EEC.

As I have already informed the House, I have had useful and informal discussions with Environment Commissioner Dimas. These discussions covered a wide range of issues including that of retrospective planning permissions and compliance with EC Directive 85/337EEC generally. It would not be appropriate to disclose details of these informal discussions, which were without prejudice to any legal proceedings between Ireland and the European Commission.

Question No. 101 answered with QuestionNo. 78.

Vacant Dwellings.

Seán Crowe

Ceist:

102 Mr. Crowe asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the average number of vacant dwellings in the State in each of the past ten years. [22476/06]

My Department does not have a detailed breakdown of housing stock by type of purchaser or by nature of occupancy. Information collected as part of the Census of Population can provide some data on vacant dwellings. However, as there may be a number of reasons why a dwelling is vacant at any point in time, such as households' absence on the night of the Census or rented dwellings between lettings, it is not possible to provide an estimate of the average numbers of vacant dwellings over the past ten years.

Environmental Policy.

Liz McManus

Ceist:

103 Ms McManus asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the amount of funding which was allocated to the grant schemes and agencies of the environmental partnership fund, environmental non-governmental organisations, Comhar, ENFO and local authorities to support environmental information and awareness raising in 2004 and in 2005. [22487/06]

The information requested by the Deputy is set out in the following schedule. This expenditure is additional to the funding of the Department's major waste awareness campaign Race Against Waste which amounted to €3.5 million per annum in 2004 and 2005.

Environmental Information and Awareness Funding

Scheme/Organisation

Description

Payments 2004

Payments 2005

Local Agenda 21 Environmental Partnership Fund

Local environment awareness projects paid via local authorities.

300,000

250,000

Environmental (Ecological) NGOs Core Funding Limited

Core funding and travel.

253,946

235,832

Comhar- the National Sustainable Development Partnership

Administrative expenses excluding salaries.

168,017

95,321

ENFO

Administrative expenses excluding salaries.

788,000

882,000

Anti-Litter Grants

Anti-litter awareness and education grants paid via local authorities.

720,000

500,000

Support grants to smaller awareness initiatives including Green Schools

Grants to support small scale projects, initiatives and environmental conferences.

218,683

74,375

Dog Breeding Industry.

Bernard Allen

Ceist:

104 Mr. Allen asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the progress made to date by his Department in implementing the recommendations of the working group to review the management of dog breeding establishments; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22513/06]

Paul Connaughton

Ceist:

114 Mr. Connaughton asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government his proposals in relation to the new standards he will introduce to enforce standards for the dog breeding industry; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22524/06]

Michael D. Higgins

Ceist:

141 Mr. M. Higgins asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the recommendations of the Working Group on the Review of the Management of Dog Breeding Establishments which he intends to implement; and the timeframe in relation to the implementation of the various recommendations. [22493/06]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 104, 114 and 141 together.

The report of the Working Group which was established to review the management of dog breeding establishments was submitted to me on 7 September 2005. The report contained a number of recommendations including recommendations in relation to the introduction of statutorily enforceable standards for the dog breeding industry in Ireland and proposed the introduction of a registration system for dog breeding establishments. However, three of the members of the Working Group disagreed with the main recommendations and submitted three separate minority reports.

On 30 May, I announced my intention to proceed with implementation of the majority recommendations of the Working Group. This decision followed the conclusion of an extensive public consultation process on the matter which showed that, while there is some opposition to the majority recommendations, there is general support for regulation in this area. The majority recommendations are contained in the Working Group's Report, copies of which are available in the Oireachtas Library.

My Department will now, in consultation with the Department of Agriculture and Food, develop the new system as quickly as possible. This process will include the development of standards for relevant dog breeding establishments and the drafting of new Regulations under the Control of Dogs Acts 1986 and 1992. It is not possible at this stage in the process to indicate the likely date of the coming into force of the new Regulations.

Departmental Schemes.

Damien English

Ceist:

105 Mr. English asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the progress to date of the rental accommodation scheme; if he has received representations from local authorities to increase the maximum rent offered in areas where rents have risen significantly; if he will grant such increases; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22544/06]

David Stanton

Ceist:

154 Mr. Stanton asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the number of people who have been housed to date under the rental accommodation scheme in the years 2005 and to date in 2006; the amount expended in the scheme to date; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22469/06]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 105 and 154 together.

Under the Rental Accommodation Scheme (RAS), local authorities are providing accommodation for certain recipients of SWA rent supplement who have been assessed as having a long-term housing need. The RAS is an additional housing option and eligible persons can indicate their preference to be accommodated by local authorities under the RAS or social housing, or to be considered under both.

The initial project to transfer rent supplement recipients of 18 months or more continuous duration is due to be completed by the end of 2008. The implementation of the RAS is a collaborative project between my Department, local authorities, the Department of Social and Family Affairs and the Community Welfare Service of the Health Service Executive.

Roll out commenced in an initial group of lead authorities, namely Dublin, Galway and Limerick City Councils, South Dublin, Donegal, Offaly, Westmeath County Councils and Drogheda Borough Council. In addition, the Cork County authorities Clare, North and South Tipperary, Fingal, Dún Laoghaire Rathdown, Galway, Louth, Laois, Longford Kilkenny, Meath Monaghan, Wexford, Wicklow, Leitrim County Councils and Waterford and Cork City Councils are also now implementing RAS. These authorities collectively cover 84% of the transferable cases. All local authorities are due to commence work on the RAS by mid-year.

The total cost of the scheme to date is €1.84m of which €947,000 has been spent in the current year. €19 million has been provided to support the implementation of the scheme in 2006. At end March 2006, 60,522 households were in receipt of rent supplement, with 33,000 for 18 months or more. The progress in meeting the long term housing needs of rent supplement recipients under the RAS is evident in the stabilisation of the RAS target group numbers since September 2005, notwithstanding an upward trend in the overall number of rent supplement recipients over the same period. Over 1,200 cases have been transferred to RAS since the initial transfers in September 2005. A further 770 households which were recipients of Rent Supplement have been provided with local authority housing. The aim is to have 5,000 cases transferred to the RAS by the end of the year.

A further 6,000 prospective RAS households have had their cases reviewed. Work is ongoing on interviewing tenants, the inspection of properties and meeting and negotiating with accommodation providers. In relation to rent feedback, indications from some local authorities are that there can be difficulties, at times, in finding good quality alternative accommodation, within rent supplement limits for single persons and couples without children.

Changes to rent supplement levels are a matter for the Minister for Social and Family Affairs who recently indicated that he will be reviewing the current levels of rent limits later this year in order to determine what limits should apply from January 2007 onwards. I understand that the review will take account of prevailing rent levels in the private rented sector generally, together with detailed input from Health Service Executive on the market situation within each of its operational areas. The review will also include consultation with my Department and voluntary agencies working in local areas which will also assist the transfer of existing rent supplement recipients to RAS. The Minister has indicated that he intends that the new rent limits will reflect realistic market conditions throughout the country and that they will continue to enable different categories of eligible tenant households secure and retain suitable rental accommodation to meet their respective needs.

Implementation of the scheme will accelerate as local authorities procure new accommodation through the development of new public private partnership (PPP) arrangements and through partnering arrangements with the Voluntary and Co-operative Housing sector.

Noise Pollution.

Seymour Crawford

Ceist:

106 Mr. Crawford asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if he will make a statement on the way in which he is tackling noise pollution. [22570/06]

A number of legislative measures are in place to address the issue of noise pollution. I recently signed into law the Environmental Noise Regulations 2006, which give effect to EU Directive 2002/49/EC relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise. Environmental noise is defined in the Regulations as unwanted or harmful outdoor sound created by human activities, including noise emitted by means of transport, road traffic, rail traffic, air traffic, and from sites of industrial activity.

The Regulations require the preparation of strategic noise maps for areas and infrastructure falling within defined criteria, e.g. large agglomerations, and major roads, railways and airports. Based on the results of the mapping process, the Regulations require the preparation of noise action plans for each area concerned. The fundamental objective of action plans is the prevention and reduction of environmental noise.

Other legislative provisions are already in place to address noise nuisance. Section 107 of the Environmental Protection Agency Act 1992 provides local authorities with powers to require measures to be taken to prevent or limit noise. These powers are generally exercised in preventing and limiting noise from commercial and industrial premises within their functional areas.

Under the Environmental Protection Agency Act 1992 (Noise) Regulations 1994, a local authority or any person may seek an order in the District Court to have noise giving reasonable cause for annoyance abated. The procedures involved have been simplified to allow action to be taken without legal representation. A public information leaflet outlining the legal options available to persons experiencing noise nuisance is available from my Department and on the Department's website, www.environ.ie.

Question No. 107 answered with QuestionNo. 80.

Estate Management.

Dinny McGinley

Ceist:

108 Mr. McGinley asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the response of each planning authority to circular letter PD 1/06 regarding their policy in relation to taking in charge of estates on a planning authority basis; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22519/06]

The responses received to date in relation to circular letter PD1/06 are being collated by my Department and will be forwarded to the Deputy as soon as possible.

Social and Affordable Housing.

Pat Rabbitte

Ceist:

109 Mr. Rabbitte asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the number of social and affordable houses short of the national development plan targets the country will be by the end of 2006, not withstanding the recent announcement of extra money allocated for housing purposes in June 2006; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22499/06]

The recent announcement of resources for the Local Authority housing construction programme in 2006 brings projects cumulative expenditure on this programme substantially ahead of NDP target. Expenditure under the Voluntary Housing and Affordable Housing Schemes will also be substantially on target, as the following table indicates:

Expected expenditure 2000 to end 2006

Target to end 2006

Outturn as % of Targets

€000

€000

Local Authority Housing

5,031,115

4,759,393

106

Voluntary Housing

1,350,563

1,370,637

99

Affordable Housing

1,668,817

1,782,012

94

Expected output 2000 to end 2006

Target to end 2006

Output as % of Targets

Local Authority Housing

31,700

40,100

79

Voluntary Housing

9,800

15,500

60

Affordable Housing

17,300*

14,000

124

*Includes Part V and A.H.I., which have come on stream since NDP.

Largely due to construction inflation, output is in some respects behind NDP forecasts, but we have put in place measures to ensure that the additional resources now available for housing achieve best value for money, optimum output and deliver programmes in a way that builds sustainable communities.

The Government have put in place a number of new arrangements to facilitate the delivery of strong programmes of social and affordable housing. Since 2000, a total of some 72,000 households have been assisted under the various social and affordable housing programmes.

In consultation with my Department, local authorities have developed five-year action plans for their social and affordable housing programmes covering the period to 2008. These incorporate the relevant targets for units delivered through Part V arrangements. The preparation of these plans has improved the identification of priority needs and will help to ensure a more coherent and co-ordinated response across all housing services. A mid-term review of plans, which will allow for adjustments to be made in light of actual performance is underway at present.

During 2005, the Government brought forward new initiatives to specifically address issues raised in the NESC report. In June, we launched the Affordable Homes Partnership to co-ordinate and accelerate the delivery of affordable housing in the Greater Dublin Area. In December 2005, the Government launched a new Housing Policy Framework: Building Sustainable Communities which outlines key principles underpinning housing policy and investment over coming years.

As a result of extra capital provision in Budget 2006, substantial increased investment in social and affordable housing is outlined in the framework. This will allow for some 23,000 new social homes to be commenced between 2006 and 2008; and some 15,000 affordable homes to be delivered. The Rental Accommodation Scheme is being implemented as a new choice for individuals in long-term need of accommodation support. In total, some 50,000 households will benefit over the coming three years from an Exchequer capital investment package of close to €4 billion. This is evidence of the Government's continuing commitment to the delivery of social and affordable housing.

Question No. 110 answered with QuestionNo. 61.

Departmental Circulars.

Pádraic McCormack

Ceist:

111 Mr. McCormack asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if, in view of the fact that his Department circulars are not readily available on his Department’s website and that there is no central holding space for all circulars issued by his Department, he will make available on his Department’s website full details of all circular letters issued by his Department; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22527/06]

My Department will give further consideration to the value of providing general access to circular letters on the our website.

Register of Electors.

Breeda Moynihan-Cronin

Ceist:

112 Ms B. Moynihan-Cronin asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the way in which he intends to ensure that legitimate voters are not deleted off the electoral register under the Government’s plan to update the register in autumn 2006; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22497/06]

Breeda Moynihan-Cronin

Ceist:

113 Ms B. Moynihan-Cronin asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if he intends to establish an updating and maintenance system for the electoral register in order that the level of inaccuracies is not allowed to happen again; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22498/06]

Trevor Sargent

Ceist:

121 Mr. Sargent asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the measures taken to ensure that local authorities have access to other State databases for the purpose of increasing the accuracy of the electoral register; the databases which have been identified as relevant; the Government Departments or State agencies which have been approached; and if any have agreed to date to make their databases available. [22585/06]

Trevor Sargent

Ceist:

126 Mr. Sargent asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if his Department has estimated the additional cost associated with providing a more accurate 2007 electoral register. [22584/06]

Fergus O'Dowd

Ceist:

433 Mr. O’Dowd asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the communication which has taken place between himself and local authorities in relation to the crisis in respect of the electoral register; the steps that are proposed to deal with this problem; the funding which has been committed by his Department to deal with the crisis; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22680/06]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 112, 113, 121, 126 and 433 together.

In law, the preparation of the Register of Electors is a matter for each local registration authority. It is their duty to ensure, as far as possible and with the co-operation of the public, the accuracy and comprehensiveness of the Register.

I recently announced a package of measures, to be implemented over the coming months, aimed at assisting registration authorities improve the Register. The measures include the use of Census enumerators or other temporary personnel to support local authorities in preparing the next Register. Related to this, I am prepared to make increased, ring fenced financial resources available to local authorities this year to update the Register; the details involved are being examined at present. An early start will be made to the local authority Register campaign for 2007/8 and there will also be an intensive information campaign.

My Department has issued updated and consolidated Guidance to ensure that all local authorities work to the same template. The Guidance advises local authorities to liaise with other relevant statutory authorities and utilities who deal regularly with households to explore opportunities for assistance in compiling the Register, and to make maximum use of databases available to authorities to crosscheck the Register.

New IT based arrangements to delete deceased persons from the Register have also been put in place. My Department is now working with a group of local authority managers and senior officials to put in place an enhanced programme for improving the next Register. This would include ensuring that each household is visited and provided with forms and information at least twice, if necessary. In the event that this process does not satisfactorily register the household, it is proposed that written notification would then be given cautioning of the danger of being omitted from the Register.

I consider that there should be a broad political consensus on these issues. For this reason, I recently met the Joint Oireachtas Committee on Environment and Local Government and had a detailed discussion regarding the Register. I will continue to keep issues relating to the Register, including longer-term options in this regard, under close review.

Question No. 114 answered with QuestionNo. 104.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions.

Thomas P. Broughan

Ceist:

115 Mr. Broughan asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if his Department has drawn up proposals to tax cars on their greenhouse gas emissions as opposed to their engine size; and when he expects to be in a position to bring such proposals to the Houses of the Oireachtas. [22505/06]

I have indicated that I am considering revising the motor taxation regime for cars to align it more closely with CO2 emissions from the vehicle rather than engine size. Work on this proposal is continuing in my Department.

Vehicle Registration Tax, which falls under the remit of my colleague, the Minister for Finance, is also levied on the basis of car engine size. While the VRT regime already favours vehicles with lower carbon dioxide emissions through a 50% relief for hybrid electric cars and flexible fuel vehicles, my Department is working with the Department of Finance and the Department of Transport on the feasibility of levying VRT on the basis of CO2 emissions. Decisions in relation to any proposal to revise VRT and other transport-related taxes would have to be finalised in a budgetary context.

Question No. 116 answered with QuestionNo. 76.

Species Action Plans.

Mary Upton

Ceist:

117 Dr. Upton asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the number of strategic action plans which are currently in place here to deal with the specifically threatened species; and the initiatives which have been put in place to draw up and implement such strategic action plans in response to the call by the European Commission in May 2006 to do so. [22492/06]

Last year, four all-island Species Action Plans were published jointly by my Department and by the Environment and Heritage Service in Northern Ireland, covering the Corncrake, the Irish Lady's Tresses Orchid, the Pollan (a freshwater fish of the herring family) and the Irish Hare. Earlier work had led to an action plan for the Natterjack Toad, which is not found in Northern Ireland.

A further series of species action plans is being prepared, also involving north/south co-operation. These cover the otter (for which Ireland is one of the most important European strongholds), bat species, the Killarney Fern, the Freshwater Pearl Mussel and the Red Squirrel. Based on successful work in preserving the last indigenous Irish Grey Partridge population at Boora, Co. Offaly, viable population has now been stabilised at Boora and the next stage is to provide conditions for it to expand. A substantial additional area of land has been acquired by my Department from Bord Na Mona to be developed as suitable grey partridge breeding and feeding grounds.

My Department is funding a five-year contract for the development and expansion of the project and one of the outputs will be a species action plan for the Grey Partridge. This programme is being well supported by the local community, and a number of local farmers are carrying out partridge-friendly farming. A number of satellite projects will also be developed, including one to assist in re-introducing the grey partridge to Northern Ireland. I intend that the process of drawing up species action plans will continue as required.

Flood Defence Works.

Dan Boyle

Ceist:

118 Mr. Boyle asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if his Department will provide guidance to local authorities in drawing up policies on developer contributions to flood defence works to meet their obligations under the draft of guidelines for planning authorities on development plans; and if he will comment on the matter. [22577/06]

My Department published Public Consultation Draft Development Plan Guidelines for Planning Authorities on 27 April this year. Comments and submissions on the Draft Guidelines are invited by 21 July next, with the intention of finalising the Guidelines in the Autumn.

The Draft Guidelines suggest, inter alia, that development plans should include policies relating to requirements on developers to support the funding of flood defences needed for particular developments, either partially or fully, depending on the circumstances. Under sub-section 4(b) of section 34 of the Planning and Development Act 2000, a planning authority may attach conditions to a decision to grant permission for a development, requiring the carrying out of works which the planning authority considers necessary for the purposes of the development authorised by the permission. However, as the Guidelines are currently in draft form for public consultation purposes, it would not be appropriate at this time for my Department to provide normative guidance to local authorities on this matter.

Waste Management.

Fergus O'Dowd

Ceist:

119 Mr. O’Dowd asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if he will increase the role of Repak in the collection of waste packaging; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22534/06]

Ireland has enjoyed considerable success in recent years in meeting targets for the recovery and recycling of packaging waste. There has been a rapid improvement in our performance in recycling this waste stream: the recycling rate rose from 15% in 1998 to 56.4% in 2004 with Ireland exceeding the EU target of 50% set for 2005.

Repak Limited was established by Irish industry in 1997 to promote, co-ordinate and finance the collection and recovery of packaging waste with a view to achieving Ireland's packaging waste recovery and recycling targets under the Packaging Waste Directive and is the sole approved compliance scheme for the recovery of packaging waste in Ireland. Repak membership income is used to subsidise the collection of packaging waste from both the household and commercial sectors. In the household sector, subsidy is provided towards the collection of packaging waste from bring banks and civic amenity recycling centres, as well as segregated kerbside collection of packaging waste from households. Waste collection or recovery services are provided by local authorities or by private waste operators rather than by Repak.

Repak is currently developing a six-year strategy to cover the period 2006 to 2011 when new EU targets will have to be met, including challenging materials based targets. This strategy is being developed under the auspices of a National Strategy Group on Packaging Waste Recycling made up of the relevant public and private sector stakeholders which was established in 2004. The Strategy will develop a range of initiatives with the objective of further improving national performance on the prevention, recovery and recycling of this important waste stream.

National Emergency Plan.

Emmet Stagg

Ceist:

120 Mr. Stagg asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if he intends to circulate to all households here, the updated information leaflet on national planning for nuclear emergencies. [22444/06]

Joe Costello

Ceist:

146 Mr. Costello asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the steps the Government has taken to prepare for the real threat of a nuclear disaster at Sellafield; the role the army has in the Government’s plan; the number of times the national emergency committee has met in each of the past five years when the national emergency plan was drawn up; when it was last updated; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [17198/06]

Joe Costello

Ceist:

147 Mr. Costello asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the steps the Government has taken to prepare for the real threat of a nuclear disaster at Sellafield; the role the Army has in the Government’s plan; how often the national emergency committee has met in each of the past five years; when the national emergency plan was drawn up; when it was last updated; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [17434/06]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 120, 146 and 147 together.

The Irish Government has in place the National Emergency Plan for Nuclear Accidents. The Plan was first drawn up and published in 1992 and the most recent revision took place in December 2005. This Plan is designed to provide the framework for the response to a major emergency at a nuclear installation in the UK or elsewhere if there is a risk that radioactive contamination could reach Ireland. It conforms to the best international standards and practice as established by the International Atomic Energy Agency and is continuously reviewed and updated in the light of technological, scientific and medical advances, although the core messages remain the same.

A major exercise of the Plan takes place every few years in order to test its effectiveness and to enhance emergency preparedness. The most recent exercise, in 2005, called "INEX-3", was carried out under the guidance of the OECD's Nuclear Energy Agency. The particular exercise was mainly concerned with the testing of decision making in relation to agricultural countermeasures and food restrictions following a simulated nuclear accident in the UK. A report on this exercise will be published in due course.

In addition to these major tests, aspects of the Plan are tested on a more frequent basis. For example, communications with the European Commission notification centre are tested daily. Given the continuous review, updating and regular testing of the Plan, and the international assistance that would be available under the International Convention on Assistance in the Case of a Nuclear Accident or Radiological Emergency, I am satisfied that the Plan is robust and that the country is ready to respond effectively to any nuclear accident or emergency.

The Emergency Response Co-ordination Committee met twice in 2001, once in 2002 and there was no meeting in 2003. It met three times in 2004, six times in 2005 and so far in 2006 has met twice. The Department of Defence and the Defence Forces are represented on the Emergency Response Co-ordination Committee under the National Emergency Plan for Nuclear Accidents. The principal roles of the Defence Forces under the Plan include the collection of sea water samples by the Naval Service, the provision of aircraft for such aerial surveys as may be required, the monitoring of radiation levels by the Reserve Defence Forces, and such other assistance as may be required in the implementation of countermeasures.

During May of 2006, my Department printed a revised Information Leaflet entitled Safeguarding Ireland from Nuclear Accidents. This was widely distributed to libraries and Citizen's Information Centres, as well as to the Departments represented on the Emergency Response Co-ordination Committee. This Leaflet is also available on the websites of both my Department and the Radiological Protection Institute of Ireland. The question of wider distribution of the Leaflet directly to individual households is an issue that is being considered under a communications strategy currently being developed under the auspices of the Task Force on Emergency Planning and the Office of Emergency Planning to ensure the public is informed to best effect in relation to emergency planning matters in general.

Question No. 121 answered with QuestionNo. 112.
Question No. 122 answered with QuestionNo. 93.

Blue Flag Beaches.

Billy Timmins

Ceist:

123 Mr. Timmins asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the progress to date in the allocation of blue flags for beaches here; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22560/06]

For 2006, Ireland has been awarded 81 Blue Flags for bathing areas and 3 for marinas. This total of 84 Blue Flags represents an increase of 2 over last year, and is the highest number of Blue Flags ever awarded for Ireland.

The Blue Flag scheme is an initiative of the Foundation for Environmental Education (FEE), an international non-governmental organisation, and is administered by environmental non-governmental organisations in each of the participating countries. In Ireland the scheme is administered by An Taisce, with financial support from my Department. The criteria for the award of Blue Flags are determined by FEE and relate to water quality, facilities for visitors and beach management e.g. litter control, environmental information and display facilities.

Departmental Schemes.

Ruairí Quinn

Ceist:

124 Mr. Quinn asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if the Government intends to replace rent supplement with housing benefit in view of the Comptroller and Auditor General expressing concern regarding the rise in the cost of rent supplement and the assertion of the report that there was little incentive in the scheme to keep rents low. [22484/06]

It is not proposed to introduce a general housing benefit scheme. The Rental Accommodation Scheme (RAS) which commenced operation in 2005 is designed to provide housing assistance through supply driven mechanisms as part of a flexible and graduated system of housing supports for those in need of housing. The costs of rent supplement is a matter for the Minister for Family and Social Affairs and I understand that report of the Comptroller and Auditor General on rent supplement is due to be considered by the Public Accounts Committee in July.

Question No. 125 answered with QuestionNo. 93.
Question No. 126 answered with QuestionNo. 112.

Illegal Quarries.

Róisín Shortall

Ceist:

127 Ms Shortall asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if he intends to issue guidelines for or direction to local authorities to deal with illegal quarries. [22503/06]

My Department does not have information on the number of unauthorised quarries or on actions taken by planning authorities under Part 8 of the Planning and Development Act 2000.

In April 2004 my Department issued Guidelines on Quarrying and Ancillary Activities under section 28 of the Planning and Development Act 2000, which requires both planning authorities and An Bord Pleanála to have regard to them in the performance of their functions. The publication of these Guidelines took place at the same time as the commencement of Section 261 of the Planning and Development Act 2000, which introduced a once-off system of registration for all quarries, except those for which planning permission was granted in the last 5 years. The enactment of section 261 will enable planning authorities to better regulate the operation of quarries in their area both by providing them with comprehensive information on such quarries and increasing their powers of control over quarrying operations.

I would also add that, aside from the registration system introduced by section 261, quarries are, of course, subject to the normal provisions regarding planning permission. As is stated in the Guidelines referred to above, a planning authority which becomes aware of an operating quarry which is an unauthorised development, through the registration process or otherwise, must consider taking enforcement action in accordance with Part VIII of the Planning and Development Act 2000.

Question No. 128 answered with QuestionNo. 85.
Question No. 129 answered with QuestionNo. 74.
Question No. 130 answered with QuestionNo. 61.

Architectural Heritage.

Billy Timmins

Ceist:

131 Mr. Timmins asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if he will make a statement on the protection of Ireland’s architectural heritage local agenda 21. [22569/06]

Under Sustainable Development: A Strategy for Ireland and guidelines for Local Agenda 21 issued by my Department, local authorities are encouraged to complete Local Agenda Plans for their areas, including provision in development plans of objectives with regard to the preservation of amenities including the built environment and urban renewal programmes to protect and enhance urban heritage and architecture.

The Planning and Development Act 2000, which provides an enhanced focus on sustainable development, contains detailed provisions under Part IV for the protection and conservation of the architectural heritage. In addition, the local authorities administer a grant scheme totalling €6 million in 2006 which supports the conservation of structures protected under Part IV. These provisions are consistent with the approach promoted through Local Agenda 21.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions.

Jim O'Keeffe

Ceist:

132 Mr. J. O’Keeffe asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if he will make a statement on the need to reduce CO2 emissions from domestic and non domestic buildings; and if he will increase with immediate effect the standards for energy performance of new buildings. [22540/06]

Direct greenhouse gas emissions (excluding electricity consumption) from domestic and non-domestic buildings accounted for almost 15% of total greenhouse gas emissions in 2004, down from over 17% in 1990. Over this period, emissions from the residential sector fell by 3.5%, despite an increase of over 40% in housing stock. This reduction is primarily attributable to the shift from coal and peat to oil and natural gas. In the same period, emissions from the non-residential (commercial and institutional) sector increased by 29%. Taken together, the two sectors accounted for an increase of 4.5% over the 1990-2004 period.

A series of revisions to Part L of the Building Regulations has been made over the last number of years, to meet higher thermal performance and insulation standards envisaged in the National Climate Change Strategy. Revisions to Part L which came into effect in January 2003 will deliver annual reductions of 250,000 tonnes of CO2 by 2012. In December 2005 further amendments to Part L of the Building Regulations were made to partly transpose Articles 3, 4, and 5 of the Energy Performance in Buildings Directive and incorporate higher thermal performance/insulation standards for new non-domestic buildings commencing on or after 1 July 2006, leading to an additional 45,000 CO2 reduction per annum by the end of 2012. The regulations also provide the legal basis for the introduction of a revised building energy performance assessment methodology for new dwellings. This expresses the energy performance of the building as a single parameter — CO2/m2/ per annum — and provides explicit recognition of the possible contribution of high-efficiency boilers, e.g. condensing boilers, and renewable energy technologies. The thermal performance standards for new dwellings are due for review and further upward adjustment by 2008.

In addition, the Energy Performance in Buildings Directive introduces a requirement for Building Energy Ratings. From January 2007 all new housing will be required to be rated on the basis of calculated energy performance. Rating of all newly constructed buildings and existing buildings for sale or rent will be applicable from January 2009. A building energy rating will allow prospective tenants or buyers to objectively compare the energy demand and performance of a building.

The recent announcement by my colleague, the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources, of a €22 million grant scheme for renewable heat technologies in the commercial sector will, when fully implemented, result in a further reduction of 160,000 of CO2 emissions per annum from that sector.

As a result of these measures, I am satisfied that Ireland has established very high standards of thermal performance and insulation for residential and non-residential buildings. These standards will progressively reduce the intensity of greenhouse gas emissions in both sectors, in line with the objectives of the National Climate Change Strategy.

Waste Management.

Gerard Murphy

Ceist:

133 Mr. G. Murphy asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if, in conjunction with all local authorities, he will establish accessible collection points to address the backlog of farm plastics; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22515/06]

Under the Waste Management (Farm Plastics) Regulations 2001, producers — i.e. manufacturers and importers — of farm plastics (silage bale wrap and sheeting) are required to take steps to recover farm plastics waste which they have placed on the market or alternatively to contribute to, and participate in, compliance schemes to recover the waste in question. The Irish Farm Film Producers Group (IFFPG) is currently the sole approved body in Ireland for the purposes of implementing a compliance scheme for the recovery of farm plastics waste.

Under the IFFPG scheme, producers apply a levy on the sale of farm plastics that in turn is transferred to the IFFPG for use in funding the collection and recovery of farm plastics waste. It is estimated that around 8,500 tonnes (some 55%) of farm plastics placed on the market in 2004 were collected for recycling. An estimated 55,000 farmers availed of the collection service in 2004. IFFPG estimate that over 12,500 tonnes of farm plastics were collected in 2005.

In spite of the successful operation of the scheme in recent years, more recently it has become apparent that the Scheme lacked sufficient resources to satisfy the demand that existed for collections of farm plastics. I have therefore, following discussions with the IFFPG, farming organisations and local authorities, recently announced amendments to the scheme to support improved services to farmers. Under the new arrangements, the scheme will be funded by a combination of the existing levies paid by the producer members of IFFPG who run the scheme and funding from weight based collection charges to be paid by farmers availing of the service. This will improve the operational efficiency of the scheme by incentivising the presentation of clean, dry plastic by farmers. IFFPG estimate that a typical farmer will incur a cost of €50 every second year arising from the introduction of this charge. The effect of the introduction of a charge will be to ensure that supply of collections of farm plastics to farmers can match the demand on an ongoing basis.

In order to ensure that producer responsibility remains the principal source of funds for the IFFPG, minimum recovery/recycling targets, to be funded by producers placing this material on the market, are being set. The target will be 50% for 2006 and 2007 and this will rise to 55% by end 2008 and 60% thereafter.

In addition, to address the issue of accumulated backlogs of farm plastic, designated facilities will be provided this year on a temporary basis by local authorities where farmers may deposit stockpiled farm plastic. This will operate on a pilot basis in the first instance in counties Galway, Clare, Mayo, Offaly and Waterford. It is planned to roll out this service to other areas after the initial trial, which will assist in determining the quantities of plastic likely to be recovered for recycling under this initiative. This service will be free to the farmer and funding to assist the local authorities will be made available from my Department through the Environment Fund. Collections have commenced in some cases and, where this is not the case, arrangements are being put in place by the local authorities involved to proceed with collections at the earliest possible opportunity.

Further steps are also to be taken by IFFPG to improve traceability whereby the compliance scheme will now examine the question of introducing a register of suppliers. The purpose of this measure will be to support compliance with the requirements of the scheme and to reduce scope for unfair competition from ‘free riders' in the market. Overall, this package of measures is designed to improve the efficiency of the IFFPG, reduce the scope for non-compliance and ensure that farmers can avail of a more reliable service.

Departmental Schemes.

Paul Kehoe

Ceist:

134 Mr. Kehoe asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if he will introduce a capital assistance scheme category within his Department of refuges, homeless hostels or such type accommodation; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22559/06]

Capital funding is available through my Department's Capital Assistance Scheme to approved voluntary housing bodies to provide accommodation to meet special housing needs, such as elderly, homeless or persons with disabilities and may include accommodation for victims of domestic violence. My Department's involvement with the scheme relates primarily to the provision of funds for individual projects. The administration of the scheme, and the certification that particular projects comply with the terms of the scheme, are the responsibility of the appropriate local authority.

Audit Committees.

Róisín Shortall

Ceist:

135 Ms Shortall asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if he has completed reviewing the role and structure of audit committees which can be established under section 122 of the Local Government Act 2001; if he has issued guidelines in relation to same; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22504/06]

In light of my review of the role and structure of audit committees under section 122 of the Local Government Act 2001, I have decided that, in line with best practice in this area, local authority audit committees should have a wider remit in relation to financial management and control (including efficiency and value for money) and should have access to external expertise in discharging this role. Accordingly, I will be requiring all county and city councils to establish new audit committees with this more comprehensive mandate. This approach is also in line with a recommendation in the Indecon Review of Local Government Financing, completed earlier this year, and with work completed by the Value for Money Unit of the Local Government Audit Service, which will be published shortly.

Climate Change.

Pat Breen

Ceist:

136 Mr. P. Breen asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if he will make a statement on the European Commission campaign to limit climate change. [22562/06]

I fully support the initiative by the European Commission. The central message of the Commission's You Control Climate Change campaign is that individuals can contribute to reducing greenhouse gas emissions through small changes in their daily behaviour. In many cases, such changes can be cost-effective for individuals. The Government is actively supporting individuals to make these changes, inter alia, through the provision of grants for the installation of renewable energy heating technologies in domestic dwellings and through the provision of information and advice through Sustainable Energy Ireland.

Waste Management.

John Deasy

Ceist:

137 Mr. Deasy asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if he will make a statement on the race against waste campaign. [22567/06]

The Race Against Waste campaign, funded by my Department, is an extended environmental awareness campaign to promote better waste management at home and in the workplace. The campaign, which was launched in November 2003, comprises a waste awareness media campaign and a communications strategy. The budget for each year of the campaign has been €3.5 million.

The media campaign encourages people to prevent, reduce, re-use, and recycle or compost their waste while the communications strategy informs the public about waste issues generally and of the need for an integrated approach to waste management.

Two programmes, the Small Change Programme aimed at SMEs, and Action at Work, aimed at larger organisations, were developed as part of the communications strategy and are promoted through seminars organised by Race Against Waste. In the current year of the campaign over 60 seminars, including twenty for County Development Boards, will encourage organisations to take action to reduce waste.

The campaign is also working with sporting and entertainment organisations to improve waste management at major events including the Ryder Cup, due to take place in September.

The campaign works closely with Local Authority Environmental Awareness Officers, who work locally with householders, schools, businesses and community groups. Communities are also encouraged to minimise, recycle and compost their waste through the national Tidy Towns competition's waste module. A partnership between Race Against Waste and the Mountmellick Environmental Group, for example, aims to make Mountmellick Ireland's "First Green Town".

To encourage better practice within the local authority service, Dublin City Council and Mayo County Council are working with Race Against Waste on a pilot project which will implement Action At Work in their offices and buildings. The experience gained from this will be shared with all other local authorities.

Factsheets on waste topics, in both Irish and English, have been published and widely distributed. A website (www.raceagainstwaste.ie) from which all Race Against Waste publications can be downloaded, and a lo-call number to deal with enquiries from the public, were introduced in 2004. In addition, an interactive web-based resource to engage young adults in the Race against Waste was launched in November 2005.

The Race Against Waste campaign, which complements increased investment in infrastructure, more effective enforcement and the introduction of pay by use systems is an effective element of our waste management strategy and has helped to raise awareness of waste issues and to significantly increase recycling rates.

Social and Affordable Housing.

Ciarán Cuffe

Ceist:

138 Mr. Cuffe asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the number of the 10,000 affordable houses which were part of the Government commitments under sustaining progress that are completed; and the number expected to be completed by the end of the period covered by the sustaining progress agreement. [22575/06]

Significant progress continues to be made under the Sustaining Progress Affordable Housing Initiative with provisional figures to the end of March 2006 indicating that a total of 1,961 housing units have been provided to date on AHI sites and through the Part V affordable arrangements.

To date, over 70 projects on State and Local Authority lands are planned which, together with the projected 2,500 housing units under the Part V affordable arrangements, have the potential to deliver over 10,000 affordable housing units under the initiative. My Department will continue to drive forward progress on all of the projects to ensure the earliest possible delivery of affordable housing units. This may entail further use of the land swap approach which was piloted successfully on the Harcourt Terrace project and other actions to parallel different stages of projects and shorten delivery time.

Question No. 139 answered with QuestionNo. 74.

Energy Efficiency Measures.

Dan Boyle

Ceist:

140 Mr. Boyle asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the details of all of the social housing schemes for which his Department made funding level adjustments in order to eliminate duplication where funding was provided by Sustainable Energy Ireland for energy efficiency measures, detailing in all cases, the scheme name, proposed scheme funding and scheme funding after Sustainable Energy Ireland grants were accounted for. [22576/06]

Ciarán Cuffe

Ceist:

417 Mr. Cuffe asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the details of all of the social housing schemes for which his Department made funding level adjustments in order to eliminate duplication where funding was provided by Sustainable Energy Ireland for energy efficiency measures, detailing in all cases, the scheme name, proposed scheme funding and scheme funding after Sustainable Energy Ireland grants were accounted for. [22849/06]

I propose to take Question Nos. 140 and 417 together.

It is my understanding that a downward adjustment of €150,000 has been proposed in the pre-tender budget cost approval notified to Dún Laoghaire Rathdown County Council in respect of the construction of 43 units at Benamore, Newtownpark Avenue to reflect an anticipated grant for energy efficiency measures from Sustainable Energy Ireland (SEI). Tender proposals in respect of this scheme have not yet been received in my Department.

Due to the time and associated cost involved I do not propose to request my Department to examine all housing scheme files to establish whether or not any financial adjustments have been made in the past in respect of grants that may have been received by local authorities from SEI. If any such adjustments were made it is very likely that it involved a small number of projects.

My Department supports and encourages the adoption of new technology and innovative approaches to design and construction of dwellings aimed at improving productivity and enhancing quality and performance of new dwellings. Where such proposals include the provision of additional energy efficiency measures these will be examined by my Department on their merits from the point of view of efficiency/ cost benefit considerations. Furthermore my Department has been in contact with SEI to indicate that in the interests of administrative efficiency the cost of using energy efficient and environmentally friendly technologies in local authority and voluntary housing developments will be borne as part of the capital cost of proposed schemes without having to have recourse to SEI grant assistance. This will be formalised shortly with SEI and notified to local authorities.

Question No. 141 answered with QuestionNo. 104.
Question No. 142 answered with QuestionNo. 61.

Litter Pollution.

Catherine Murphy

Ceist:

143 Ms C. Murphy asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government his views in relation to the Irish Business Against Litter initiative on litter; if he intends to take action; if so, the form same will take; if he has corresponded with local authorities in relation to the survey specifically and litter generally; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22442/06]

IBAL is one of a number of anti-litter initiatives supported by my Department aimed at raising public awareness of litter pollution and energising support for local authority anti-litter actions. This specific initiative has been supported since 2003.

The National Litter Pollution Monitoring System, which measures the extent and severity of litter pollution nationally, shows that since 2003 there has been an improvement in litter pollution levels countrywide. The positive trend shown by the Monitoring System is also reflected in the IBAL League results, which record that cleanliness levels in the 53 participating towns and cities are generally improving.

My Department liaises on a regular basis with local authorities in relation to anti-litter initiatives and anti-litter actions, the benefits of which can be seen in these improved results. There is of course room for further improvement and the various approaches are kept under continual review.

Disability Services.

Paul McGrath

Ceist:

144 Mr. P. McGrath asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government his Department’s sectoral plan to improve disability services; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22549/06]

As required under the Disability Act 2005, my Department's sectoral plan will be laid before the Houses of the Oireachtas no later than 28 July 2006. The finalised plan will build on the outline sectoral plan, published in September 2004, and subsequent consultations with people with disabilities, representative organisations and other Government Departments with linked sectoral plans. It will set out national objectives and guidelines for access to local authority public buildings, services, facilities, amenities, and information, as well as to heritage sites and other facilities managed by my Department.

In parallel, Part M of the Building Regulations will also be reviewed and updated in accordance with a commitment set out in the Outline Plan, and the Building Control Bill 2005, published in December 2005, will, when enacted, strengthen the enforcement powers of local authorities and introduce a Disability Access Certification system to ensure that new buildings, or buildings which have been extended or materially altered should be accessible to all.

Each local authority will be required to draw up an implementation plan within nine months of the statutory approval of the sectoral plans by the Houses of the Oireachtas, on the basis of a detailed accessibility audit. The implementation plans, drawn up in consultation with organisations representing people with disabilities, will set out a programme of actions to give effect to the commitments and objectives contained in the 2005 Act, in order to promote and pro-actively encourage equal opportunities for persons with disabilities to participate in the economic, social and cultural life of the community.

I have provided €18 million in 2006 to help local authorities and other bodies under the aegis of my Department to implement the National Disability Strategy, as part of a multi-annual funding programme, begun in 2005, which will continue until 2009.

Social and Affordable Housing.

Seán Crowe

Ceist:

145 Mr. Crowe asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if he will review the extent to which local authorities are meeting the needs of their tenants in respect of necessary repairs to the social housing stock. [22477/06]

Responsibility for the management, maintenance and improvements of their rented dwellings, including the implementation of a planned maintenance programme lies with the local authorities and is financed from their own resources. The National Survey of Housing Quality 2001-2002 reported that just under three-quarters of persons in local authority accommodation are satisfied or very satisfied with the general condition of their accommodation. The report also noted that the level of activity of local authorities in responding to requests for repairs exceeded all other housing categories except one.

Questions Nos. 146 and 147 answered with Question No. 120.

Planning Issues.

Eamon Ryan

Ceist:

148 Mr. Eamon Ryan asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government his views on whether the formal registration of legal options to purchase lands would improve the transparency of the planning and development process. [22583/06]

Ensuring openness, probity, fairness and efficiency in the operation of the planning system is an ongoing and key challenge. Zoning of land by a planning authority is effected as part of the making of a development plan. Section 10 of the Planning and Development Act 2000 states that a development plan shall include objectives for "the zoning of land for particular purposes (whether residential, commercial, industrial, agricultural, recreational, as open space or otherwise, or as a mixture of those uses), where and to such an extent as the proper planning and sustainable development of the area, in the opinion of the planning authority, required the uses to be indicated". The process of making or varying a development plan is also set out in the 2000 Act and requires, inter alia, extensive public consultation and adoption of the development plan or variation by the elected members.

Persons applying for planning permission must state their application what interest they hold in the land in question or include the consent of the landowner. Planning permissions are given for specific development proposals on specified sites in the context of the proper planning and sustainable development of the area, irrespective of the land's ownership.

At present, land purchase options may be registered voluntarily. However, the All-Party Oireachtas Committee on the Constitution, in its Ninth Progress Report — Private Property, recommended that the existence of options should be included in the categories of transactions to be revealed publicly as a measure to achieve transparency in property markets generally. Consideration is being given to approaches dealing with registration of land options in that context.

Sustainable Communities.

Joan Burton

Ceist:

149 Ms Burton asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the date on which he expects the complete and full policy statement on building sustainable communities to be published; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22483/06]

Work is well underway on a new housing policy statement which will set out more detailed approaches to implementing the Housing Policy Framework: Building Sustainable Communities published in December 2005. This statement, which will be published later this year will take a medium term perspective, will have regard to current discussions within the Partnership Talks, and will link into the investment proposed under the next National Development Plan.

Departmental Schemes.

Aengus Ó Snodaigh

Ceist:

150 Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government his views on whether local authorities should not be using the rental accommodation scheme as an alternative to the construction and provision of social housing for those people within their local authority area who have been identified as being in need of social housing. [22507/06]

Under the Rental Accommodation Scheme (RAS) local authorities are providing accommodation to certain recipients of SWA rent supplement who have been assessed as having a long-term housing need. The RAS scheme is part of a graduated range of housing supports and is an additional housing option for authorities in meeting housing need. Eligible persons can indicate their preference to be accommodated by local authorities under the RAS or social housing or to be considered for both.

Local Authority Housing.

Arthur Morgan

Ceist:

151 Mr. Morgan asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if he accepts that many local authorities are unable to fund necessary and urgent repairs to their social housing stock from their own resources; and if additional funds will be made available to local authorities to enable them to carry out these necessary repairs. [22475/06]

The management, maintenance and improvements to their rented dwellings is the responsibility of each local authority and the funding of such works is required to be provided by local authorities from their own resources as part of their ongoing maintenance programmes.

My Department does, however, provide capital funding for major refurbishment work to local authority dwellings under the Remedial Works Scheme. My Department has been encouraging local authorities to avail of this scheme to remediate dwellings in need of refurbishment. Funding is also provided to local authorities for the refurbishment of houses that have remained vacant for periods longer than six months and require significant refurbishment prior to reletting. Local authorities are required to meet from their own resources the first €10,000 of the cost of such refurbishment in respect of each dwelling under this initiative. In addition, my Department provides capital funding, subject to conditions, to local authorities for the installation of central heating in their rented houses without such a facility.

Local Authority Funding.

Catherine Murphy

Ceist:

152 Ms C. Murphy asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the preparations being made to release additional funding to local authorities in counties that have shown a strong pattern of population growth following the publication of the preliminary census results; if same will result in a relaxation of the staffing cap where it is deemed necessary; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22443/06]

In the intercensal period 2002-2006 general purpose grants from the Local Government Fund to local authorities rose by some 48%. This increase is well in excess of any expected increase in population over the same period. Population is one of the factors used in determining these grants and updated data provided by the recent census will be used when allocating such grants in future years.

In light of Government policy on the regulation and control of numbers in the public service, including local authorities, I am keeping the overall employment position in the local government sector under regular review.

Question No. 153 answered with QuestionNo. 74.
Question No. 154 answered with QuestionNo. 105.

Building Regulations.

Phil Hogan

Ceist:

155 Mr. Hogan asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if he will amend the Building Regulations for the Conservation of Fuel and Energy to increase the energy efficiency required for nursing homes; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22510/06]

In December 2005, Part L of the Building Regulations was amended to substantially increase energy conservation standards for non-domestic buildings, including Nursing Homes, with effect from 1 July 2006. I recently published the 2006 edition of Technical Guidance Document L on how to comply with the amended Part L regime.

Constitutional Challenges.

Finian McGrath

Ceist:

156 Mr. F. McGrath asked the Taoiseach the reason for the breakdown in communications between his Department and the Offices of the Attorney General, the Chief State Solicitor and the Director of Public Prosecutions in the matter of the decision of the Supreme Court; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22416/06]

As I indicated to the House last week, there was a failure of communications within the Office of the Attorney General that led to the Attorney General not being personally informed about the Supreme Court hearing of the CC case. The Attorney General has now put in place additional procedures to prevent any recurrence. Details of those are contained in the document that I circulated to Deputies on 7 June, 2006. Copies of that document have also been placed in the Oireachtas Library.

An inquiry has also been instituted to identify any aspects of the organisation structure, systems, procedures or staffing arrangements within the Office of the Attorney General that may require to be amended, so as to ensure that an information and notification deficit does not recur.

Unemployment Levels.

Ruairí Quinn

Ceist:

157 Mr. Quinn asked the Taoiseach the breakdown by gender, age and geographic location of those listed by the Central Statistics Office as long-term unemployed; the trends of note in these figures over the past three years; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22309/06]

The exact information requested by the Deputy is not available. Statistics on the labour force are compiled from the Quarterly National Household Survey. The latest statistics available are for the period December 2005 to February 2006 and show that there are 26,200 persons classified as long-term unemployed. The duration of unemployment figures for the past three years, classified by gender and age group are set out in the following table. Statistics of the kind requested by the Deputy are not available at a regional level.

Persons aged 15 years and over classified by sex, age group and duration of unemployment (ILO)

QNHS Dec-Feb 2004Age group

QNHS Dec-Feb 2005Age group

QNHS Dec-Feb 2006Age group

Duration

15-24

25-44

45 or over

Total

15-24

25-44

45 or over

Total

15-24

25-44

45 or over

Total

Males

Less than 1 year

9.8

14.0

5.8

29.7

9.8

14.0

6.6

30.3

12.1

15.0

5.8

32.9

1 year and over

4.5

12.3

6.0

22.8

4.6

10.3

6.0

21.0

3.7

10.1

5.8

19.7

not stated

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

Total males

14.3

26.4

11.9

52.6

14.4

24.5

12.6

51.5

15.9

25.2

11.7

52.8

Females

Less than 1 year

8.7

10.9

3.6

23.2

8.0

11.5

4.3

23.8

9.0

14.9

4.9

28.9

1 year and over

2.2

3.9

1.7

7.7

1.8

3.4

1.5

6.7

1.6

3.1

1.9

6.6

not stated

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

Total females

10.9

14.8

5.3

31.0

10.0

14.9

5.8

30.6

10.6

18.0

6.8

35.4

All persons

Less than 1 year

18.5

25.0

9.4

52.9

17.8

25.5

10.9

54.1

21.1

29.9

10.7

61.7

1 year and over

6.6

16.2

7.7

30.5

6.5

13.8

7.5

27.8

5.3

13.3

7.7

26.2

not stated

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

0.3

*

*

*

*

Total persons

25.2

41.2

17.2

83.6

24.4

39.3

18.4

82.1

26.5

43.2

18.5

88.2

*Sample occurrence too small for estimation.

National Transport Survey.

Eamon Ryan

Ceist:

158 Mr. Eamon Ryan asked the Taoiseach the number of road passenger kilometres travelled here each year. [22390/06]

The exact information requested by the Deputy is not available. Comprehensive statistics on Road Passenger kilometres can only be obtained by means of a detailed survey of road users. A report prepared by the National Statistics Board on Policy Needs for Statistical Data on Enterprises has recommended that a National Transport Survey, collecting this type of information, should be carried out. No decision has yet been made on this proposal. This would be a very large-scale survey and the CSO is currently examining technical and budgetary requirements for implementing this new survey.

Ministerial Responsibilities.

Paul McGrath

Ceist:

159 Mr. P. McGrath asked the Taoiseach the functions which have, since the last general election, been delegated to Ministers of State at his Department by the Government under powers conferred on it by section 2(1) of the Ministers and Secretaries (Amendment) (No.2) Act 1977; and the statutory instrument number of each such order. [22829/06]

My statutory functions, in so far as they relate to the Central Statistics Office, are currently delegated to Mr. Tom Kitt T.D., Minister of State at the Department of the Taoiseach. The Statistics (Delegation of Ministerial Functions) Order 2004 was made by Government on 19 October 2004 (Statutory Instrument No. 664 of 2004). No other statutory functions have been delegated to any of the Ministers of State in my Department.

Health Services.

John McGuinness

Ceist:

160 Mr. McGuinness asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the financial assistance available to a person (details supplied) in County Kilkenny; and if their benefit will be increased. [22453/06]

The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.

Hospitals Building Programme.

Pat Breen

Ceist:

161 Mr. P. Breen asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children if the planning application for phase 1A of the Ennis General Hospital capital development project has been submitted to the local planning office; if not, if it is still expected that this application will be submitted by June 2006, as per Parliamentary Question No. 163 of 5 April 2006; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22280/06]

The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. This includes responsibility for considering new capital proposals or progressing those in the health capital programme. Accordingly, my Department is requesting the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.

Mental Health Services.

Brian O'Shea

Ceist:

162 Mr. O’Shea asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children her proposals in regard to the under-recognition and under-resourcing of services for mental illness in childhood; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22281/06]

As the Deputy may be aware, the future direction and delivery of all aspects of our mental health services, including child and adolescent psychiatry, were considered in the context of the work of the Expert Group on Mental Health Policy. The Government published the Group's report entitled "A Vision for Change" in January, 2006.

The report sets out how positive mental health in children can be promoted generally in our society, and how specialist mental health services can be delivered efficiently to children who need them. Child and adolescent psychiatric services are in place in each Health Service Executive area, with 39 child community health teams offering a wide rage of therapeutic approaches.

"A Vision for Change” acknowledges gaps in the current provision of child and adolescent services and makes several recommendations for the further improvement of these services. Recommendations include early intervention and health promotion programmes, primary and community care services, specialist mental health services for the treatment of complex disorders and the provision of additional Child Community Mental Health Teams. The Government has accepted the Expert Group’s report as the basis for the future development of the mental health services.

The development of child and adolescent psychiatric services has been a priority for my Department in recent years. The number of approved child and adolescent consultant psychiatrist posts has been increased from 45 in 2000 to 70 in 2006.

Public Health Issues.

Brian O'Shea

Ceist:

163 Mr. O’Shea asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children her proposals in regard to the consequences of alcohol and nicotine consumption during pregnancy by the mother on the health of the unborn child and on post birth development; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22282/06]

A study on the use of alcohol, nicotine and illicit drugs during pregnancy has recently been carried out at one of the country's largest maternity hospitals. A report outlining the findings of the study has now been received by my Department and is currently being considered by officials.

Health Service Staff.

Pat Carey

Ceist:

164 Mr. Carey asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the guidelines which are issued by the Health Service Executive to its employees to ensure that they avoid conflict of interest in the carrying out of their duties; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22283/06]

Section 25 of the Health Act 2004 requires employees of the Health Service Executive to maintain proper standards of integrity, conduct and concern for the public interest in performing functions under that or any other enactment as employees of the Executive. Section 25 also obliges the Executive to issue codes of conduct for employees other than employees to whom a code of conduct under section 10 (3) of the Standards in Public Office 2001 applies. A code of conduct issued by the Executive for employees must indicate the standards of integrity and conduct to be maintained by them in performing their functions. A person to whom such a code of conduct relates is required to have regard to and be guided by the code in performing his or her functions.

As this is a matter for the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004, my Department has asked the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to respond directly to the Deputy.

The HSE is also preparing a Code of Governance to be submitted to me for approval under section 35 of the Health Act 2004. The Code must include, amongst other things, a code of conduct setting out basic objectives for the conduct of the Board of the HSE, its members, members of its committees, employees, advisers, consultants and contractors.

Hospital Waiting Lists.

Willie Penrose

Ceist:

165 Mr. Penrose asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children if she will take steps to have a person (details supplied) in County Westmeath, who is in need of a quadruple by-pass, admitted to a hospital or in the alternative have this person treated under the National Purchase Treatment Fund; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22295/06]

The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.

Health Services.

Jan O'Sullivan

Ceist:

166 Ms O’Sullivan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children if outstanding matters have been resolved to transfer the payment of costs incurred in treating public patients at the Mid-Western Radiation Oncology Centre from the Mid-Western Hospitals Development Trust to the Health Service Executive; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22296/06]

The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal, social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to respond directly to the Deputy in relation to the matter raised.

Hospital Services.

Fergus O'Dowd

Ceist:

167 Mr. O’Dowd asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children if she will publish the report on acute hospital services in the north east; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22297/06]

Fergus O'Dowd

Ceist:

188 Mr. O’Dowd asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children when she received the report from Teamwork Management Services entitled Improving Safety and Achieving Better Standards from the Health Service Executive; the findings of this report; when she will publish same; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22411/06]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 167 and 188 together.

Under the Health Act 2004, the Health Service Executive has responsibility to manage and deliver, or arrange to be delivered on its behalf, health and personal social services.

The HSE commissioned Teamwork Management Services to undertake a review of acute hospital services in the North East. I understand that the review, which commenced in March 2006, has recently been completed and that the report has been considered by the Board of the HSE. I have been briefed on the contents of the report. The manner and timing of the publication of the report is a matter for the Executive.

Medical Aids and Appliances.

Pat Breen

Ceist:

168 Mr. P. Breen asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children further to Parliamentary Question No. 239 of 30 May 2006, when a person (details supplied) in County Clare will be facilitated with an electric wheelchair; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22299/06]

I understand that the Health Service Executive wrote to the Deputy on 31st March, 2006 indicating that the person concerned was assessed by an Occupational Therapist, and that a powered wheelchair was recommended. The Health Service Executive has now indicated that a decision on the matter is pending.

Health Services.

Michael Ring

Ceist:

169 Mr. Ring asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the reason a person (details supplied) in County Mayo was refused home care service. [22328/06]

The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, the Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.

Pat Breen

Ceist:

170 Mr. P. Breen asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children when an application for enhanced payment subvention will be processed for a person (details supplied) in County Clare; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22329/06]

The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, the Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.

Pat Breen

Ceist:

171 Mr. P. Breen asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children if she will investigate the reason a person (details supplied) in County Clare who was deemed extremely ill by their family, was discharged from Ennis General Hospital, County Clare and subsequently died following immediate re-admission; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22330/06]

The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive (HSE) under the Health Act, 2004.

I understand that the HSE Hospital Network Manager for the area has advised the Deputy that if the family of the person in question wish to contact the Manager of Ennis General Hospital, he will be available to discuss any queries they may have in relation to their relatives' treatment.

Tony Gregory

Ceist:

172 Mr. Gregory asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the reason a person (details supplied) in Dublin 3 who is a diabetic was refused a dietary allowance; and if same will be reviewed. [22336/06]

The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.

Health Service Staff.

Paul McGrath

Ceist:

173 Mr. P. McGrath asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the number of staff who are employed, with specific reference to diagnostic services for children and adolescents suspected of suffering from autism to include all its forms that is Asperger’s Syndrome, autism spectrum disorder, dysgraphia and obsessive compulsive disorder, in each county, Carlow and Kilkenny, separately, in the Health Service Executive psychological services, psychiatric services and autism team; the roles in which they are employed, differentiating between full and part-time staff and providing the man hours provided by both full and part time staff, monthly; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22353/06]

The Deputy's question relates to the management of human resources which is the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.

Health Services.

Paul McGrath

Ceist:

174 Mr. P. McGrath asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the number of children and adolescents awaiting appointments for both counties Carlow and Kilkenny separately at the Health Service Executive psychological services, psychiatric services and autism team; the average waiting time for an appointment; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22354/06]

Paul McGrath

Ceist:

175 Mr. P. McGrath asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the number of children and adolescents who are currently being attended to for both counties Carlow and Kilkenny separately by the Health Service Executive psychological services, psychiatric services and autism team; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22355/06]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 174 and 175 together.

The Deputy's questions relate to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to have these matters investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.

Medical Cards.

Pat Breen

Ceist:

176 Mr. P. Breen asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children when an application will be processed for a medical card for a person (details supplied) in County Clare; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22356/06]

The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.

Cancer Screening Programme.

Denis Naughten

Ceist:

177 Mr. Naughten asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children if, in view of the ongoing delay in the roll-out of breast screening in the west and north west, she will direct the Health Service Executive to provide the service via private screening operators; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22357/06]

Denis Naughten

Ceist:

210 Mr. Naughten asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children if she will enter discussions with private clinics such as the Bon Secours Hospital in Galway with a view to providing interim screening measures in view of the delay in the roll-out out of BreastCheck to the west and north-west of Ireland; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22697/06]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 177 and 210 together.

A breast screening programme is a complex multi-disciplinary undertaking that requires considerable expertise and management involving population registers, call recall systems, mammography, pathology and appropriate treatment and follow-up. A programme must be quality assured and acceptable to women who attend for screening. The first phase of the programme is of a high quality and a similar quality in the West and South is essential.

I have met with representatives of BreastCheck and they are fully aware of my wish to have a quality assured programme rolled out to the remaining regions in the country as quickly as possible. For this to happen, essential elements of the roll-out must be in place including adequate staffing, effective training and quality assurance programmes. I have made additional revenue funding of €2.3m available to BreastCheck to meet the additional costs of roll-out. I have also approved an additional 69 posts.

BreastCheck recently interviewed for Clinical Directors for both regions and appointments have been made and both will take up their positions later this year. Both are currently undergoing additional training in relation to their role as Clinical Director. This month BreastCheck will begin recruiting Consultant Radiologists, Consultant Surgeons and Consultant Histopathologists for both centres. BreastCheck is also recruiting radiographers. While the recruitment of radiographers is difficult at present as there is a shortage internationally of trained personnel, BreastCheck is confident that it will be in a position to employ sufficient radiographers at both sites.

BreastCheck also requires considerable capital investment in the construction of two new clinical units and in the provision of five additional mobile units and state of the art digital equipment. I have made available an additional €21m capital funding to BreastCheck for this purpose. BreastCheck is in the process of short-listing applicants to construct its two new clinical units. BreastCheck is also confident that the target date of next year for the commencement of roll-out to the Southern and Western regions will be met.

Any proposal received by BreastCheck to support the roll-out of its screening programme will be carefully examined to assess the extent to which it complies with existing standards. BreastCheck recently conducted an evaluation of a proposal from a private screening service and concluded that the clinic in question would not be in a position to provide a screening programme in line with BreastCheck standards.

Hospital Services.

Paul Kehoe

Ceist:

178 Mr. Kehoe asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the reason a person (details supplied) is not being transferred from Wexford General Hospital to Beaumont Hospital to enable a brain tumour removal operation to take place as quickly as possible; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22360/06]

The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.

Hospital Equipment.

Fergus O'Dowd

Ceist:

179 Mr. O’Dowd asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the progress to date in the provision of a CAT scanner to Louth County Hospital, Dundalk. [22361/06]

The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.

Nursing Home Subventions.

Pat Breen

Ceist:

180 Mr. P. Breen asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children when an application for subvention will be processed for a person (details supplied) in County Clare; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22362/06]

The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, the Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.

Hospital Procedures.

Pat Breen

Ceist:

181 Mr. P. Breen asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children when a person (details supplied) in County Clare will be facilitated with an appointment for surgery; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22363/06]

The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this case investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.

Housing Aid for the Elderly.

Pat Breen

Ceist:

182 Mr. P. Breen asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children when an application under the housing aid for the elderly scheme will be processed for a person (details supplied) in County Clare; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22364/06]

The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. This includes responsibility for the provision of the Housing Aid Scheme for the Elderly, on behalf of the Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government. Accordingly, the Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.

Hospital Services.

Pat Breen

Ceist:

183 Mr. P. Breen asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children when a person (details supplied) in County Clare will be facilitated with a bed in the Rehabilitation Hospital, Dún Laoghaire; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22365/06]

The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.

Medical Cards.

John McGuinness

Ceist:

184 Mr. McGuinness asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children if she will expedite an appeal for a medical card for a person (details supplied) in County Carlow. [22377/06]

The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.

Health Services.

John McGuinness

Ceist:

185 Mr. McGuinness asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children if a medical officer's report has been submitted to Kilkenny County Council in relation to the case of a person (details supplied) in County Kilkenny; and if she will expedite the matter. [22393/06]

The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.

Niall Blaney

Ceist:

186 Mr. Blaney asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children if a further half hour home help per day, five days a week will be approved for a person (details supplied) in County Donegal; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22394/06]

The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, the Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.

Hospitals Building Programme.

Fergus O'Dowd

Ceist:

187 Mr. O’Dowd asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children her Department’s proposals for a private hospital to be built in Drogheda as reported in a newspaper (details supplied). [22410/06]

The HSE recently advertised for expressions of interest for the construction and operation of private hospitals on the sites of 11 publicly funded hospitals, including Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital, Drogheda. Proposals will be subject to detailed evaluation which will have regard to an assessment of need and the existing and planned capacity on a particular site within the relevant region.

Interested parties are being invited to express an interest for one or more projects and are required to complete and submit a pre-qualification questionnaire before the end of June 2006.

Question No. 188 answered with QuestionNo. 167.

Medical Records.

Finian McGrath

Ceist:

189 Mr. F. McGrath asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the position regarding the medical records of a person (details supplied) in Dublin 3; and the reason for the delay in sending same out. [22412/06]

The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.

Medical Aids and Appliances.

James Breen

Ceist:

190 Mr. J. Breen asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children if she will supply, as a matter of urgency, a defibrillator machine to a centre (details supplied); and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22425/06]

The Task Force on Sudden Cardiac Death, whose report "Reducing the Risk: A Strategic Approach” was published in March 2006, recognises the need for early cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Overall responsibility for implementation of the report’s recommendations has been assigned to the Health Service Executive. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.

Hospital Waiting Lists.

Martin Ferris

Ceist:

191 Mr. Ferris asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the reason a person (details supplied) in County Kerry has been waiting two years for a hernia operation at Kerry General Hospital. [22426/06]

The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.

Departmental Funding.

Olwyn Enright

Ceist:

192 Ms Enright asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the amount of funding from her Department allocated to the Rape Crisis Centre each year for the past three years; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22430/06]

My Department does not directly fund or co-ordinate health and personal social services to victims of abuse. Monies are made available each year, formerly through the health boards, and now through the Health Services Executive, for the provision of services to women victims of violence. In recent years there has been a substantial increase in funding so that now over €12 million is provided annually for the provision of such services. Since the enactment of the Health Act 2004, the distribution of this funding is now a matter for the Health Services Executive. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.

Health Services.

David Stanton

Ceist:

193 Mr. Stanton asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the amount available in 2005 in each of the Health Service Executive areas to enable home care to be made available to people suffering from dementia and Alzheimer’s disease; the number of people in each of these areas who benefited from such home care packages; the extra amount and the total amount being made available in 2006 in each HSE area in this regard; the number of people availing of these services in 2006 in each area; the number of people waiting for a service in each area; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22433/06]

The Tánaiste has allocated €30 million for the provision of Home Care Packages in 2006, and a further €25 million for the Scheme in 2007. The 2006 Budget allocation will provide an additional 2,000 extra Home Care Packages in 2006, to be introduced on a phased basis, with the majority of the packages to be commenced in the second half of 2006. The HSE has advised that 249 new home care packages were commenced in the first quarter of 2006. They are available to older people, based on assessed need, and do not distinguish between those with and without dementia.

The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, the Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.

Services for People with Disabilities.

Jerry Cowley

Ceist:

194 Dr. Cowley asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the amount the Government is spending on defending cases brought by relatives of autistic people on account of the Government's failure to provide adequate services for people with autism; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22457/06]

Since the late 1990s, a number of parents of children with autism have taken High Court cases to obtain specific educational services for their children. Since 2000, my Department has been involved in approximately 145 cases in which applicants are seeking access to such appropriate education services. In cases involving children with disabilities this also includes, on occasion, access to appropriate health related supports.

The cost to my Department, excluding the costs of the State defence which is borne by the Office of the Chief State Solicitor, in each of the years since 2000 was as follows:

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

Legal Costs

Nil

Nil

2,492,579

1,339,660

2,741,436

Settlements

Nil

4,739

438,450

297,106

297,181

290,987

Total

Nil

4,739

438,450

2,789,685

1,636,841

3,032,423

It should be noted that these figures do not include the costs of staff involved in responding to these cases or the costs to other State bodies involved in these cases.

These cases allege a failure on behalf of the State to provide for an appropriate education as provided for in the Constitution. While these cases are mainly taken by parents of children with autism, there are also a number of cases relating to ADHD, intellectual and physical and sensory disabilities. The Deputy should note that my Department is not specifically named as a defendant in all of these cases but is involved due to the role of my Department in the formulation and development of policy in respect of the provision of healthcare and support services. The Health Act 2004 provided for the creation of the Health Service Executive (HSE) which was established on 1 January, 2005. Pursuant to the Health Act, 2004, the HSE has the responsibility to manage and deliver or arrange to be delivered on its behalf, health and personal social services. This includes responsibility for all health related supports. As such, my Department does not have responsibility in relation to the provision of services to individuals. In a number of the cases the Health Service Executive is also named as a co-defendant.

As the Deputy is aware there has been significant progress made over the past number of years in relation to enhancing and developing services for people with disabilities. An integral part of the National Disability Strategy is the implementation of two major legislative measures — the Disability Act 2005 and the Education for Persons with Special Educational Needs Act 2004 both of which provide a framework for the planning and delivery of health and personal social services and education services for people with disabilities. The Multi-Annual Investment Programme published by the Government in December 2004 as part of the National Disability Strategy contained details of specific commitments in relation to the provision of specific high priority disability services over the period 2006 to 2009. The programme, together with the enhancement of other key support services, is a key factor in building the additional capacity required to put in place the new framework provided for in the Disability Act and the Education for Persons with Special Educational Needs Act. The funding provided for in the National Disability Strategy amounts to €900 million over the period 2006 to 2009. In addition to the costs associated with this programme which amount to €59 million in 2006, a further additional €41 million is being provided this year, the bulk of which will be used to enhance the level and range of multidisciplinary support services available to adults and children with intellectual, physical and sensory disabilities, autism and mental illness, with a priority on enhancing the assessment and support services for children with disabilities.

I am satisfied that the level of investment in disability services demonstrates that the Government is committed to the provision of appropriate services to enhance capacity within the health services in order to deliver on the various legislative provisions contained in the National Disability Strategy. This includes continued enhancements to services to allow children with disabilities participate in the education system.

Special Educational Needs.

Paudge Connolly

Ceist:

195 Mr. Connolly asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the reason an agreement to increase the pay of workers with the National Learning Network negotiated in 2001 has not been implemented by the Health Service Executive north east region and FÁS; the reason a further ruling in 2005 by the Labour Court recommending that the increase be paid has been ignored by both the HSE and FÁS, five years after the increase was negotiated; her views on whether the HSE have acted honourably in this situation; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22458/06]

The National Learning Network (NLN) is a private sector Company which is contracted by the Health Service Executive (HSE), amongst others, to provide services to people with disabilities. The contractual arrangement between NLN and the HSE is a matter for the parties themselves. However, I understand that arrangements are currently being made to address the matter referred to by the Deputy.

Services for People with Disabilities.

Paul Kehoe

Ceist:

196 Mr. Kehoe asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the services which are being provided for teenagers who have autism spectrum disorder in Kilkenny City; if she will confirm that the Kilkenny Autism Team social worker only works for one day a week; her plans to expand this service and if parents who are forced to go down the route of a private psychological assessment are entitled to a refund of fees for same. [22618/06]

The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.

Hospital Waiting Lists.

David Stanton

Ceist:

197 Mr. Stanton asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the number of public patients waiting for initial appointments with consultants in order to be assessed for possible elective surgical procedures such as hip operations; the longest and average amount of time that people are waiting; the measures that she intends to put in place to speed up the process; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22619/06]

Data on out-patient waiting times are not collated nationally by my Department. The management of out-patient waiting lists and waiting times is, in the first instance, a matter for the Health Service Executive and the individual hospitals concerned.

However, in 2005 I asked the National Treatment Purchase Fund (NTPF) to examine the needs of patients waiting longest on out-patient waiting lists. As a result, the NTPF set up a number of out-patient pilot projects around the country. The outcome was that over 4,400 persons, who had been waiting longest in a number of specialties, received consultations at out-patient level in private hospitals. The NTPF intends to expand their out-patient initiative in 2006 and the Fund has asked for proposals from hospitals in this regard.

Health Services.

John McGuinness

Ceist:

198 Mr. McGuinness asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children if she will expedite the provision of home aids in the case of a person (details supplied) in County Kilkenny; if occupational therapy will be provided for the person; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22622/06]

The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, the Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.

Caoimhghín Ó Caoláin

Ceist:

199 Caoimhghín Ó Caoláin asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children if she will establish the full facts regarding the case of a person (details supplied) in County Monaghan; the changes in protocols which have been introduced for the general practitioner out of hours service in the north-east as a result of this case; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22632/06]

The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.

Nursing Home Subventions.

Róisín Shortall

Ceist:

200 Ms Shortall asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the reason a person (details supplied) in Dublin 24 must pay for their keep in a nursing home but only receive subvention of €76.35 per week in view of the fact that they do not own any property; if she will request that the subvention amount be altered in view of this fact and the person’s medical condition; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22646/06]

The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, the Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.

Hospital Services.

Mary Upton

Ceist:

201 Dr. Upton asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the reason a person (details supplied) in Dublin 12 referred from one hospital to another for a scan has been waiting since February 2006; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22647/06]

The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.

Proposed Legislation.

Denis Naughten

Ceist:

202 Mr. Naughten asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the status of the pharmacy bill one and two; when she intends to publish them; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22648/06]

Government approval was given on 2nd May 2006 to the draft heads and general scheme of the first Pharmacy Bill and these have now been forwarded to the Parliamentary Counsel's office for priority drafting. I have, with Government approval, circulated a copy of this document to the opposition spokespersons on Health. I have also arranged for my officials to provide a copy to the Pharmaceutical Society of Ireland and the Irish Pharmaceutical Union. Work will commence on the second Bill as soon as the first Bill has been completed.

Hospital Waiting Lists.

Enda Kenny

Ceist:

203 Mr. Kenny asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the number of elderly people on waiting lists for occupational therapy services in Dublin City by area; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22670/06]

The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, the Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.

National Treatment Purchase Fund.

Enda Kenny

Ceist:

204 Mr. Kenny asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children if the National Treatment Purchase Fund has accessed beds in Blanchardstown Hospital; if so, the number in each of the past three years; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22671/06]

Enda Kenny

Ceist:

205 Mr. Kenny asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children if the National Treatment Purchase Fund has accessed beds in James Hospital; if so, the number in each of the past three years; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22672/06]

Enda Kenny

Ceist:

206 Mr. Kenny asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children if the National Treatment Purchase Fund has accessed beds in Beaumont Hospital; if so, the number in each of the past three years; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22673/06]

Enda Kenny

Ceist:

207 Mr. Kenny asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children if the National Treatment Purchase Fund has accessed beds in Tallaght Hospital; if so, the number in each of the past three years; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22674/06]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 204 to 207, inclusive, together.

The National Treatment Purchase Fund (NTPF) was established as one of the key actions for dealing with public hospital waiting lists arising from the 2001 Health Strategy. The NTPF purchases procedures for public patients predominantly from private hospitals in Ireland. The Strategy envisaged that the NTPF might also make use of any capacity within public hospitals to arrange treatment for public patients. It was recognised that during the start-up phase of the Fund, the use of public capacity could account for up to 30% of total NTPF activity, once public core service planned activity was not compromised. In June 2005 my Department advised NTPF that use by the Fund of public facilities should be limited to 10% of its total referrals for treatment.

My Department has asked the Acting Chief Executive of the Fund to respond to the Deputy in relation to the detailed information requested.

Health Services.

Enda Kenny

Ceist:

208 Mr. Kenny asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the number of children on a waiting list to have a tonsillectomy in Tallaght Hospital; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22675/06]

The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.

Michael Ring

Ceist:

209 Mr. Ring asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the reason the Health Service Executive have not yet responded to Parliamentary Question No. 162 of 9 May 2006 regarding the review board on Orthodontic Services in Ireland; and if she will investigate this matter and ensure that a reply issues without delay. [22696/06]

My Department has been informed by the Health Service Executive that a response has issued in respect of the matter raised by the Deputy in Parliamentary Question No.162 of 9 May 2006.

Question No. 210 answered with QuestionNo. 177.

Health Service Staff.

Jack Wall

Ceist:

211 Mr. Wall asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children further to Parliamentary Question No. 180 of 24 May 2006 the position of the Chief Executive Officers of the health boards; if the persons involved are within the employment of the Health Service Executive; if not, if there were redundancy or severance payments made; the cost of such payments; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22728/06]

On 31 December 2004, there were twelve post holders in the system at the level of Chief Executive Officer: two on permanent contracts and ten on fixed term contracts. Employment in the Health Boards/ERHA/Area Boards is superannuated under the Local Government (Superannuation) (Consolidation) Scheme — S.I. 455 of 1998 (LGSS). The superannuation benefits of permanent officers ceasing to hold office is covered under section 70 and 71 of the Scheme. Benefits of those on fixed term contracts are provided for under Section 78 of the Scheme and entitlements include immediate pension, retirement lump sum, 26 weeks severance gratuity, and added years (subject to maximum of ten years). Membership of the staff superannuation scheme is mandatory for all staff. Therefore in the normal course of events the benefits outlined above would have been payable to all of the CEOs on retirement or completion of contract.

In addition, following discussions under the auspices of Mr. Finbarr Flood, acting as Mediator, exit terms were to be supplemented as follows:

1. a once-off payment of €10,000 to all CEOs in recognition of the legal duties and functions of the chairpersons and members of the Health Boards having been statutorily assigned to them during the period 1st July 2004 to 31st December 2004,

2. a re-training grant of up €10,000 to be paid on basis of vouched expenditure,

3. an ex gratia payment equivalent to six months' gross salary.

Proposals 2 and 3 applied to those CEOs who requested to leave the HSE by 1st July 2005. These proposals were put forward by the Mediator on the basis of the uniqueness of the position of the CEOs within the context of the abolition of the Health Boards and the transition to the HSE structures under the Government's health service reform programme, and also the leading role played by the CEOs in facilitating the transfer of accountability and ensuring a safe passage to the new structures.

Ten of the twelve former CEOs opted to exit the system (nine on contract and one permanent post holder (who had full service)). One former CEO who has a permanent post is now in employment in the HSE and the remaining contract post holder has opted to finish out his contract of employment. The costs of such payments were administered by the Health Service Executive and I understand that the total cost of providing superannuation benefits and ex gratia was in the region of €3.4 million. I have asked the HSE to notify the Deputy of the exact figure in due course.

Emmet Stagg

Ceist:

212 Mr. Stagg asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the number of public health nurses employed in the health service in County Mayo in each of the years from 1997 to 2005 and to date in 2006. [22729/06]

The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act, 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have the matter investigated and have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.

Adoption Services.

Pat Carey

Ceist:

213 Mr. Carey asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children if her attention has been drawn to the fact that adoptive parents have to wait three to four years to have the assessment of their applications completed; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22730/06]

The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive (HSE) under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.

The Government did allocate €1 million to the HSE in additional ongoing funding commencing in 2005 to assist in tackling intercountry adoption waiting times. I understand that this additional funding is being used to pilot measures which will, for example, allow for more flexible working arrangements within the HSE with a view to addressing waiting times. The registered Adoption Society, PACT, has also received significant additional funding to allow them to expand their intercountry adoption services.

Hospital Waiting Lists.

Olwyn Enright

Ceist:

214 Ms Enright asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the reason a person (details supplied) in County Offaly has been on the waiting list for over two years for a hip replacement; when this person can expect an appointment for the operation; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22768/06]

The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.

Health Services.

Fergus O'Dowd

Ceist:

215 Mr. O’Dowd asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the number of home help hours allocated in County Louth for each year since 2001; the number of persons benefiting in each year; the budget allocated in each year in County Louth; if the allocation was used in each year; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22769/06]

The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, the Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.

Hospital Services.

Fergus O'Dowd

Ceist:

216 Mr. O’Dowd asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the matters discussed and the directions given in relation to the acute hospitals in County Louth by hospital in the Dublin North area at a meeting of the Health Service Executive held in Parkgate Street on 27 April 2006; the persons who were present; the result of the teleconference on this matter on 4 May 2006 and the decisions made; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22770/06]

The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.

Waste Management.

Fergus O'Dowd

Ceist:

217 Mr. O’Dowd asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the amount spent in each year since 2002 in waste management in County Louth by the Health Service Executive; the amount projected to be spent in 2006; the details and expected costs and savings of the proposed new recycling programme in County Louth; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22771/06]

The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. This includes responsibility for waste management in the health service in Louth.

Accordingly, my Department is requesting the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.

Health Service Funding.

Fergus O'Dowd

Ceist:

218 Mr. O’Dowd asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the technical adjustments made to the acute hospital budget for the Louth County Hospital and Lourdes Hospital, Drogheda for each of the past three years to date in 2006; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22772/06]

The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.

Health Service Staff.

Fergus O'Dowd

Ceist:

219 Mr. O’Dowd asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the details of all pending posts for acute hospitals in County Louth, by hospital and the expected savings expected as a result, which have been placed on hold with immediate effect by the Health Service Executive; the amount of time these posts have been vacant; the number of patient services affected as a result; the number of individual patients to be affected; the expected number of patients who will have to travel outside the region as a result; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22773/06]

Fergus O'Dowd

Ceist:

220 Mr. O’Dowd asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the details of all new development posts on hold for acute hospitals in County Louth, by hospital, which have now been placed on hold with immediate effect by the Health Service Executive; the reasons these new development posts were agreed on initially; the cost of same; the expected impact on services, patient services and the number of individual patients to be affected; the expected number of patients who will have to travel outside the region as a result; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22774/06]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 219 and 220 together.

The Deputy's questions relate to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have these matters investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.

Health Services

Fergus O'Dowd

Ceist:

221 Mr. O’Dowd asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the impact the proposed cutbacks in the budget of the Lourdes Hospital, Drogheda will have on immediately implementing the proposals made by Judge Harding Clarke; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22775/06]

The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.

Fergus O'Dowd

Ceist:

222 Mr. O’Dowd asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the amount spent by Louth County Hospital and Lourdes Hospital, Drogheda on new items of medical and surgical supplies for each year since 2002; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22776/06]

The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.

Hospital Services.

Fergus O'Dowd

Ceist:

223 Mr. O’Dowd asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the actions proposed by the directors of nursing in Louth County Hospital and Lourdes Hospital, Drogheda to initiate review of equipment being rented; the items which have been identified; the rentals which will cease immediately; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22777/06]

The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.

Fergus O'Dowd

Ceist:

224 Mr. O’Dowd asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the cost for each year since 2002 for laboratory testing being processed in private laboratories for acute hospitals in County Louth; the way in which this testing will be carried out as a result of acute hospital cutbacks proposed in Louth County Hospital and Lourdes Hospital, Drogheda. [22778/06]

The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.

Fergus O'Dowd

Ceist:

225 Mr. O’Dowd asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the way in which she intends to reduce maintenance costs in the Louth County Hospital, Dundalk and Lourdes Hospital, Drogheda; the expected reduction; and where maintenance will now be carried out. [22779/06]

The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.

Fergus O'Dowd

Ceist:

226 Mr. O’Dowd asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the process of MRSA cohorting which will be introduced in Louth County Hospital and the Lourdes Hospital, Drogheda; the number of patients who were placed in private rooms or otherwise for each year since 2002; the number of patients who were placed with other patients sharing private rooms; the expected saving for each hospital; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22780/06]

The Deputy's question relates to the management and delivery of health and personal social services, which are the responsibility of the Health Service Executive under the Health Act 2004. Accordingly, my Department has requested the Parliamentary Affairs Division of the Executive to arrange to have this matter investigated and to have a reply issued directly to the Deputy.

Vaccination Programme.

Bernard J. Durkan

Ceist:

227 Mr. Durkan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children if she has considered offering routine immunisation of babies against pneumococcal meningitis; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22828/06]

The inclusion of the pneumococcal vaccine in the Primary Childhood Immunisation Programme is being considered by the National Immunisation Advisory Committee as part of its review of the immunisation guidelines. No decision has yet been reached. My Department and the Health Service Executive will be guided by the expert advice from the NIAC in this regard.

Ministerial Responsibilities.

Paul McGrath

Ceist:

228 Mr. P. McGrath asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children the functions which have, since the last general election, been delegated to Ministers of State at her Department by the Government under powers conferred on it by Section 2 (1) of the Ministers and Secretaries (Amendment) (No.2) Act 1977; and the statutory instrument number of each such order. [22830/06]

Since the last general election the following functions have been delegated to Ministers of State at this Department under powers conferred on it by Section 2 (1) of the Ministers and Secretaries (Amendment)(No. 2) Act 1977.

The following functions were delegated when my predecessor Minister Micheál Martin was Minister for Health and Children.

To Minister of State Ivor Callely. SI Number 651 of 2002 refers (Previous SI Number 599)

Sections 6, 7 and 10 of the Health (Nursing Homes) Act, 1990 (No. 23 of 1990).

To Minister of State Brian Lenihan. SI Number 650 of 2002 refers (Previous SI Number 600)

Adoption Acts, 1952 to 1998;

Children Acts 1908 to 1989;

Child Care Act, 1991 (No. 17 of 1991);

Protections for Person Reporting Child Abuse Act, 1998 (No. 49 of 1998);

Children Act, 2001 (No. 24 of 2001).

To Minister of State Tim O'Malley. SI Number 652 of 2002 refers (Previous SI Number 601)

Section 5 and Part V of the Health Act, 1947 (No. 28 of 1947)

Sections 5, 20 and 51 of the Food Safety Authority of Ireland Act, 1998 (No. 29 of 1998)

Food Standards Act, 1974 (No. 11 of 1974)

Sale of Food and Drugs Acts, 1875 to 1936

Milk and Dairies Acts, 1935 to 1988

Part VIII of the Mental Treatment Act, 1945 (No. 19 of 1945)

Section 41 of the Mental Treatment Act, 1961 (No. 7 of 1961)

Section 4 of the Health (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 2001 (No. 14 of 2001)

Mental Health Act, 2001 (No. 25 of 2001)

Section 65 of the Health Act 1953 (No. 26 of 1953)

Sections 26, 59, 61, 69, 71 and 72 of the Health Act 1970 (No 1 of 1970).

To Minister of State Brian Lenihan. SI Number 474 of 2003

Adoption Acts, 1952 to 1998;

Children Acts 1908 to 1989;

Child Care Act, 1991 (No. 17 of 1991);

Protections for persons Reporting Child Abuse Act, 1998 (No. 49 of 1998);

Children Act, 2001 (No. 24 of 2001);

Ombudsman for Children Act, 2002 (No. 22 of 2002).

Since I became Minister for Health and Children the following functions have been delegated.

To Minister of State Brian Lenihan. SI Number 842 of 2004 refers

Adoption Acts 1952 to 1998

Children Acts 1908 to 1989

Child Care Act 1991 (No. 17 of 1991)

Protections for Persons Reporting Child Abuse Act 1998 (No. 49 of 1998)

Children Act 2001 (No 24 of 2001)

Ombudsman for Children Act 2002 (No. 22 of 2002).

To Minister of State Tim O'Malley. SI Number 843 of 2004 refers

Part VII of the Mental Treatment Act 1945 (No. 19 of 1945)

Section 41 of the Mental Treatment Act 1961 (No. 7 of 1961)

Section 4 of the Health (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 2001 (No. 14 of 2001)

Mental Health Act 2001 (No. 25 of 2001)

Section 65 of the Health Act 1953 (No. 26 of 1953)

Sections 26, 59, 61, 69, 71 and 72 of the Health Act 1970 (No. 1 of 1970).

To Minister of State Seán Power. SI Number 844 of 2004 refers

Irish Medicines Board Act, 1995 (No. 29 of 1995)

Sections 5, 20 and 51 of the Food Safety Authority of Ireland Act, 1998 (No. 29 of 1998)

Food Standards Act, 1974 (No. 11 of 1974)

Sale of Food and Drugs Acts, 1875 to 1936

Milk and Dairies Acts, 1935 to 1988

Tobacco Products (Control of Advertising, Sponsorship and Sales Promotion) Act 1978

Tobacco (Health Promotion and Protection) Act 1988

Public Health (Tobacco) Acts 2002 and 2004

Sections 6, 7 and 10 of the Health (Nursing Home) Act, 1990.

To Minister of State Seán Power. SI Number 277 of 2005 refers

The powers and duties of the Minister for Health and Children conferred on that Minister of the Government by or under Section 5 in so far as they relate to Part V of the Health Act 1947 (No. 28 of 1947).

I have also delegated to Minister of State, Seán Power additional responsibilities on an administrative basis as follows:

Health Promotion (including Cardiovascular Strategy and Women's Health);

Drug Misuse and HIV/AIDS;

Contingency Planning (Health Protection);

Matters relating to the development of services for older people throughout the country;

Matters relating to the development of Palliative Care services throughout the country.

Flood Relief.

Bernard J. Durkan

Ceist:

229 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for Finance the state of discussions or negotiations between his Department and Kildare County Council with a view to the permanent resolution of the flooding at Mill Lane, Leixlip, County Kildare; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22808/06]

I would refer the Deputy to my reply of the 4th May outlining the position in relation to flooding at Leixlip. As I indicated in that reply, the Commissioners of Public Works are willing to provide funding to Kildare County Council to carry out interim works if they are shown to be economically and environmentally sustainable. The permanent solution to the flooding problem at Mill Lane, Leixlip will be identified in the proposed Rye River Catchment Flood Risk Assessment and Management Plan. OPW will consider facilitating interim works if they are necessary, provided they are shown to be economically and environmentally sustainable and reasonably likely to be consistent with the recommendations of the Plan.

National Monuments.

Bernard J. Durkan

Ceist:

230 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for Finance the extent of further restoration works planned for Castletown House, Celbridge, County Kildare; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22810/06]

The present position is that refurbishment of the entrance gate lodges is well advanced, a contract for upgrading perimeter security is scheduled to commence in early Autumn, a research study commissioned by OPW on the structural condition of the main staircase, is well advanced and proposals for enhanced security measures at the Conolly Folly are progressing. Arising from a request from Kildare County Council regarding the provision of some parking facilities on Castletown grounds, OPW has submitted a proposal to Kildare County Council for consideration. Future proposals include refurbishment of the farmyard buildings, structural works to the Conolly Folly, provision of improved visitor reception facilities in the House together with improved vehicular access and additional parking facilities.

Bernard J. Durkan

Ceist:

231 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for Finance if and when he expects to allocate sufficient funds for the restoration of the obelisk at Maynooth, County Kildare; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22811/06]

Proposals for structural works to the Conolly Folly including projected costs, are at a preliminary stage and the proposals will of course be subject to Planning Permission. The question of allocating funds for this project is therefore premature.

Tax Code.

Gerard Murphy

Ceist:

232 Mr. G. Murphy asked the Minister for Finance if an original P21 will be issued to a person (details supplied) in County Cork. [22338/06]

I have been advised by the Revenue Commissioners that the document referred to issued to the person concerned on 8 June 2006.

Jack Wall

Ceist:

233 Mr. Wall asked the Minister for Finance if a person (details supplied) in County Kildare will be furnished with a P21 for 2005; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22339/06]

I have been advised by the Revenue Commissioners that a PAYE balancing statement form P21 for 2005 issued to the taxpayer dated 8 June 2006.

Public Service Contracts.

Gay Mitchell

Ceist:

234 Mr. G. Mitchell asked the Minister for Finance his views on correspondence (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22340/06]

The Government in mid 2004 decided to reform construction procurement so as to achieve greater cost certainty, better value for money and more cost effective delivery of public works projects. My Department, with the assistance of the Government Contracts Committee for Construction (GCCC), specialist legal drafters and external technical expertise, has developed a suite of Standard Forms of Construction Contract and Conditions of Engagement for Construction Related Services, e.g. architects, engineers and quantity surveyors, to give effect to the Government decision.

In relation to the Standard Forms of Construction Contract I am aware of the concerns raised in the correspondence supplied as my officials have had extensive consultations with the construction industry on these and other issues related to the new Contracts over the last year. During these comprehensive discussions and communications, the views, comments and concerns of the construction industry, including those in the correspondence supplied have been outlined in considerable detail. My officials have sought to address all these concerns, where appropriate, within the context of the Government decision. It is not, however, possible nor appropriate to accept all the points raised by the industry. We are now in the final stages of the consultation process which it is expected to be brought to a close very shortly. We will then be proceeding to the next phase of the implementation which is a comprehensive training programme for public sector practitioners to ensure that the new arrangements are used appropriately across the public sector.

Tax Code.

John McGuinness

Ceist:

235 Mr. McGuinness asked the Minister for Finance his views on reducing the VAT on courtesy vehicles used by pubs and hotels or exempting the vehicles from vehicle registration tax where it is proven that these vehicles are being used in the wider campaign to stop drinking and driving; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22418/06]

I have no plans to introduce VAT reductions or exemption from Vehicle Registration Tax in respect of courtesy vehicles used by pubs and hotels.

Emmet Stagg

Ceist:

236 Mr. Stagg asked the Minister for Finance the reason for the delay in issuing a statement of tax credits to a person (details supplied) in County Kildare. [22441/06]

I have been advised by the Revenue Commissioners that no application for a tax credit certificate has been received from the person concerned. The person's employer has arranged for the appropriate Form 12A to be completed by him and, following receipt of the completed form, Revenue will issue a tax credit certificate to him.

Departmental Properties.

Ruairí Quinn

Ceist:

237 Mr. Quinn asked the Minister for Finance if, further to the undertaking given by the Office of Public Works in February 2006 to take remedial action to address excessive air temperatures in certain party offices in Leinster House 2000, the action that has been taken to date; the steps in place to address uncomfortable air temperature conditions caused by solar heating and heat generated by office equipment; the reason no action has been taken since this commitment was given; when action will be taken; if temporary measures to address the problem are being implemented; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22456/06]

The Office of Public Works has arranged for air conditioning to be installed in the Labour Party Press Room and this work was completed on the weekend of the 10th June 2006. In addition to this the Office of Public Works has engaged with a specialist contractor with a view to installing heat-reflecting film on the glazing as a temporary and experimental measure on two floors on the south facing façade in Block A of LH 2000. It is intended that this work should be completed before the end of June 2006. This satisfies the commitment given in February 2006.

It should be stated that the original design and installation in the building provided some infrastructure for local cooling in high gain areas but it was not possible to utilise this in the Labour Press Room due to the lack of available space and so an alternative solution was needed.

Dormant Accounts Fund.

Brian O'Shea

Ceist:

238 Mr. O’Shea asked the Minister for Finance the number of dormant accounts, the proceeds of which have been paid into the Dormant Accounts Fund that were opened by Irish exiles residents in the UK; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22617/06]

Under the Dormant Accounts Act 2001 and the Unclaimed Life Assurance Policies Act 2003, credit institutions and insurance undertakings are required, each April, to transfer to the National Treasury Management Agency, all moneys falling dormant in the previous year. Each credit institution and insurance undertaking is also required under the legislation to keep a register of their dormant accounts or policies. However, there is no legal requirement or business reason for them to compile a breakdown based on the country of residence of the account-holder. The information requested by the Deputy is not, therefore, available.

Social Finance Fund.

Joan Burton

Ceist:

239 Ms Burton asked the Minister for Finance further to Parliamentary Question No. 115 of 23 May 2006 and recent reports in the media, if he is disappointed that the banks are investing only €25 million in the Government social finance fund in view of the fact that the removal of the bank levy in budget 2006 saved the banks over €100 million in levies; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22644/06]

Joan Burton

Ceist:

240 Ms Burton asked the Minister for Finance the way in which applicants will be assessed when applying for a loan in relation to the Government’s social finance fund; if community projects with limited or no direct income from clients will be eligible for loans from this fund; what will happen to community projects that are unable to generate the necessary income to make repayments on the loan; if the banks have agreed to an acceptable level of non-repayment to reflect the higher risk category of the community projects in view of the fact that they are unable to access loans in the normal way; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22645/06]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 239 and 240 together.

The Government's intention to promote community development was originally set out in the Programme for Government. In 2003, Sustaining Progress highlighted the role of social finance in that context. The banks' indication of willingness to contribute seed funding to the social finance initiative was given in response to a specific invitation in that regard. The banks have been involved in the development of the concept over time. They participated in the Round Table following the publication of the Social Finance in Ireland report in September 2003. There was a bank representative on the Steering Group that oversaw the preparation of the In the Common Interest report, which was launched by the Minister for Finance in November 2004.

The bank levy was introduced in the 2003 Budget as a temporary measure for three years and is therefore no longer in effect. There is no link between the social finance initiative and the bank levy.

Relative to the current scale of social finance provision nationwide, €25m represents a very significant volume of resources. This level of funding is aligned to what is expected to be appropriate to the next phase of the evolution of social finance provision. My priority is to ensure that the available resources are applied carefully in a focused way with clear objectives, avoiding bureaucracy, and with a view to market testing options for the further development of social finance.

My Department is continuing to consult with the Office of the Attorney General in relation to the legal design of the proposed wholesale supplier of social finance.

Departmental Staff.

Michael Ring

Ceist:

241 Mr. Ring asked the Minister for Finance the reason the period of delay in the stamping office of the Revenue Commissioners in Galway has been increasing; his proposals to reduce the period of delay to an acceptable period; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22654/06]

Michael Ring

Ceist:

242 Mr. Ring asked the Minister for Finance the staffing levels, at each grade, in the stamping office of the Revenue Commissioners in Galway for each of the past five years; and his plans to increase the staffing levels to ensure that deeds lodged for stamping are completed within a reasonable amount of time. [22655/06]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 241 and 242 together.

I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that the reason for the delay in the stamping of deeds in the Galway Stamps Office is as a result of increasing volumes of business combined with the considerable loss of experienced staff due to staff changes, including normal course inter-departmental transfers, and long-term sick leave since September 2005. The training-in time of the replacement staff was significant due to the nature of the work. This training was carried out by their colleagues in the office, which in turn affected their own output. To address the delay issue, 3.4 staff were assigned in May of this year. To get the stamping of deeds up to date it is planned to assign a further 4 staff when the recruitment process for them is completed.

The following table shows the staff levels at each grade in the Galway Stamp Office for the past five years. The 2006 figure is the current position and does not reflect the 4 staff mentioned above.

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

HEO

0.5

0.5

0.4

0.4

0.8

EO

3.0

5.0

5.7

4.7

6.0

SO

0

0

0

0.8

0.8

CO

0.5

2.7

3.0

1.5

5.5

TOTAL

4.0

8.2

9.1

7.4

13.1

As a result of the measures already taken the period of delay has begun to drop and once the additional staff are trained it is expected that the Customer Service standard of processing 80% of deeds within 10 working days and 100% within 20 working days will be fully met. The staff resource applied will fall to be reviewed on an ongoing basis to ensure that the level of service is maintained.

Decentralisation Programme.

Gerard Murphy

Ceist:

243 Mr. G. Murphy asked the Minister for Finance his views on the proposed re-locating of Teagasc headquarters in Kanturk County Cork and closing the office in the James O’Keeffe Institute in Newmarket in view of the decentralisation programme. [22727/06]

Teagasc is an agency under the aegis of the Department of Agriculture and Food. This relocation of Teagasc to Kanturk is not part of the Decentralisation Programme as announced in December 2003. I have asked my colleague, the Minister for Agriculture and Food, to respond to the Deputy directly.

National Parks.

Joan Burton

Ceist:

244 Ms Burton asked the Minister for Finance the position in relation to the report/review of the Phoenix Park; the terms of reference of the consultants and the estimated cost of the consultancy; when they are expected to report, and to whom; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22802/06]

The Commissioners of Public Works expect to receive the report from the consultants, at the end of this month. The total estimated cost of the report is c.€40,000. The terms of reference are set out below in the recent advertisement seeking submissions from the public.

PHOENIX PARK TRAFFIC STUDY

The Phoenix Park is Ireland's premier National Historic Park, and Europe's largest enclosed city park. It is widely recognised as a valuable amenity resource and a major environmental lung for Dublin City. On the other hand there are competing demands arising from increased development and traffic congestion in Dublin city. As a result the Phoenix Park faces a number of challenges in ensuring it remains a sustainable, highly valued, and safe recreational and amenity area. Against this background the Commissioners of Public Works (custodians of the Phoenix Park) have commissioned Faber Maunsell Consulting Engineers to carry out a comprehensive Traffic Study of the Phoenix Park. The study will address the growing pressures on existing Phoenix Park infrastructure and develop proposals designed to protect the Phoenix Park and all its users, both now and for the future, while making every effort to facilitate through traffic. The study will analyse current and future projected commuting patterns, road safety issues and traffic management proposals. It will examine the potential for public transport and road safety improvements. Proposals will be made for the long term management and monitoring of traffic in the Phoenix Park, in keeping with the objectives of the Phoenix Park Management Plan. The study involves a public consultation process with interested parties, which will take place over the coming weeks. Interested parties are invited to make submissions of direct relevance to the study to Faber Maunsell Consulting Engineers by post or e-mail to the addresses below. The final date for receipt of submissions is Friday 5th May 2006.

phoenixparkinfo@fabermaunsell.com, Ms Bevin McFadden, Senior Consultant, Faber Maunsell Consulting Engineers, The Malt House, First Floor, North Block, Grand Canal Quay, Dublin 2. The Commissioners of Public Works are subject to the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act, 1997.

Ministerial Responsibilities.

Paul McGrath

Ceist:

245 Mr. P. McGrath asked the Minister for Finance the functions which have, since the last general election, been delegated to Ministers of State at his Department by the Government under powers conferred on it by Section 2 (1) of the Ministers and Secretaries (Amendment) (No. 2) Act 1977; and the statutory instrument number of each such order. [22831/06]

Since the last general election in May 2002 there has been no delegation of functions to the Minister of State at the Department of Finance under Section 2(1) of the Ministers and Secretaries (Amendment) (No. 2) Act, 1977 of any of the statutory powers of the Minister for Finance.

Departmental Staff.

Denis Naughten

Ceist:

246 Mr. Naughten asked the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources the reason for the delay in transferring the accounts branch of his Department in Castlebar to the Road Safety Authority in Ballina; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22358/06]

There is no proposal to transfer my Department's Accounts Branch in Castlebar to the Road Safety Authority. I presume that the Deputy may be referring to the transfer of a number of corporate support posts from my Department to the Department of Transport in connection with the earlier transfer to that Department of the former Maritime Transport and Maritime Safety functions of my Department. In this regard, I am advised that four members of the Accounts Branch staff in Castlebar have volunteered to transfer to the Department of Transport with a view to their subsequent re-designation as employees of the Road Safety Authority. My Department's officials are involved in discussions with their Department of Transport counterparts to finalise an appropriate effective date for these transfers.

Inland Fisheries.

Marian Harkin

Ceist:

247 Ms Harkin asked the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources the amount which has been spent in the Border Midland Western region since the beginning of the National Development Plan under sub-measure tourism and recreational angling; and if any of this money has been reallocated to other programmes. [22419/06]

As I outlined in my reply to Question No. 274 of 28 February 2006, the expenditure incurred under the Tourism and Recreational Angling Measure (TRAM) of the National Development Plan (2000-2006) to the end of 2002 was €504,025 for the BMW region. There was no expenditure in 2003, 2004 or 2005 and no expenditure has been provided for the measure in the Department's budget for 2006.

The mid term review of the NDP by the ESRI concluded that the external environment with regard to the tourist sector had deteriorated to an extent where the likely return to further investment in the sector was unlikely to have high returns. As a result funding for TRAM was diverted to higher priority tourism projects.

Fisheries Conservation.

Brian O'Shea

Ceist:

248 Mr. O’Shea asked the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources if he is satisfied that the independent group appointed to examine the implications of the full alignment with the scientific advice for the 2007 salmon season, intends to consult broadly enough with all stakeholders in the sector; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22440/06]

Arising from my undertaking to follow the recommendations of the Standing Scientific Committee of the National Salmon Commission to fully align the management of the fishery with their scientific advice for 2007, I established the Independent Group, to which the Deputy refers, to examine the implications for the commercial sector in 2007 and beyond.

The Group will make recommendations on the options available to address any financial hardship arising for individuals involved in commercial salmon fishing from full compliance with the scientific advice for 2007. I have previously described the specific remit of the Independent Group to the House, which requires them, inter alia, to draw on the reports already generated through the National Salmon Commission, by the National Fisheries Managers Executive and the Standing Scientific Committee and engage in appropriate consultation with relevant stakeholders.

I understand that the group placed advertisements in the media last April inviting submissions from interested parties. The closing date for submissions is 30th June 2006. I am also advised that the group has taken a number of meetings with stakeholder representatives. I expect that this approach will allow for an appropriate level of consultation with all stakeholders in the sector. The independent group is continuing its work and is expected to present its report to me in September 2006.

Foreshore Licences.

Jim O'Keeffe

Ceist:

249 Mr. J. O’Keeffe asked the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources the position in relation to a foreshore licence for a fish plant proposed to be built at Pallas Pier in Ardgroom, Beara in West Cork; if same has been applied for; the position in relation to such an application; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22636/06]

The Department has no record of a foreshore licence application in respect of this proposal.

Alternative Energy Projects.

Bernard J. Durkan

Ceist:

250 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources if grants can or will be offered to persons who wish to install a small wind turbine with a rotor diameter less than 2.5 metres; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22807/06]

Wind energy projects are currently supported on a community and commercial scale. Sustainable Energy Ireland (SEI) has published a study on the metering options for Small Scale Renewable electricity and Combined Heat & Power Generation (CHP) in Ireland. The study identified a number of areas which require further analysis including the ability of such processes to secure adequate payment for their exports; connection standards and processes for smaller generators, and the implications of the single electricity market for small-scale electricity generation. SEI is commissioning work to address these issues in 2006 and this will inform further policy decisions in relation to domestic wind turbines.

Ministerial Responsibilities.

Paul McGrath

Ceist:

251 Mr. P. McGrath asked the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources the functions which have, since the last general election, been delegated to Ministers of State at his Department by the Government under powers conferred on it by Section 2 (1) of the Ministers and Secretaries (Amendment) (No. 2) Act 1977; and the statutory instrument number of each such order. [22832/06]

Since July 2002, a variety of marine and other functions was delegated by Government Orders under the Ministers and Secretaries (Amendment) (No. 2) Act 1977 to successive Ministers of State at the Department of Communications, Marine and Natural Resources. Those functions were specified in those Orders: Orders made in favour of John Browne [4] Lapsed on his transfer to Department of Agriculture and Food; 1. Communications, Marine and Natural Resources (Delegation of Ministerial Functions) Order 2002 — S.I. 374; 2. Marine (Delegation of Ministerial Functions) Order 2004 — S.I. 236 Current; 3. Marine (Delegation of Ministerial Functions) Order 2006 — S.I. 82; 4. Marine (Delegation of Ministerial Functions) (No. 2) Order 2006 — S.I. 167.

Orders made in favour of Pat the Cope Gallagher [7] Lapsed on his transfer to Department of Transport; 1. Marine (Delegation of Ministerial Functions) (No. 2) Order 2004 — S.I. 703; 2. Marine (Delegation of Ministerial Functions) (No. 3) Order 2004 — S.I. 769; 3. Marine (Delegation of Ministerial Functions) Order 2005 — S.I. 82; 4. Marine (Delegation of Ministerial Functions) (No. 2) Order 2005 — S.I. 346; 5. Marine (Delegation of Ministerial Functions) (No. 3) Order 2005 — S.I. 549; 6. Marine (Delegation of Ministerial Functions) (No. 4) Order 2005 — S.I. 569; 7. Marine (Delegation of Ministerial Functions) (No. 5) Order 2005 — S.I. 843 [Consolidated all 6 previous Orders, which it replaced, so as to take account of transfer of certain Ministerial functions to Minister for Transport by S.I. No. 842 of 2005, with effect from 1 January 2006]. Text of the 11 Orders is on DCMNR website at www.dcmnr.ie.

Broadcasting Services.

Paul Connaughton

Ceist:

252 Mr. Connaughton asked the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources if his attention has been drawn to the unease and anxiety felt amongst the sick and elderly in relation to the proposed discontinuation of mass and other religious services broadcast from local churches as a result of complaints of interference from the aviation sector; the proposals he has to have these religious services made available to the sick and elderly; if there will be a cost involved; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22852/06]

I am aware of the situation regarding the broadcasting of services from parish churches, to which the Deputy refers. The Commission for Communications Regulation (ComReg) is the statutory body responsible for the management of the radio spectrum in Ireland and is required to investigate any interference with services, particularly where critical safety issues are concerned. ComReg fully understands the importance of such local community services and intends to permit wireless public address systems to meet the needs of religious and other community organisations.

To this end, ComReg has drafted regulations permitting the safe use of public address systems to transmit local church services and other public events. These regulations require my consent as Minister for Communications, under the Wireless Telegraphy Act 1926 and will be in place shortly. ComReg recently met with representatives of the Catholic Church to explain the proposed new scheme to them. I understand from ComReg that the Church representatives expressed satisfaction with the new arrangements.

Overseas Development Aid.

Joan Burton

Ceist:

253 Ms Burton asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the amount from 1997 to date in 2006 expended in each year in support of foundations associated or under the control of former President of the United States Bill Clinton; the breakdown of direct donations by the Irish Aid programme to such foundations and the ancillary costs met or undertaken by the Aid programme or the Department of Foreign Affairs in respect of the work of such programmes; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22591/06]

Joan Burton

Ceist:

254 Ms Burton asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs if, in relation to the proposed visit to Ireland by former US President Clinton the visit has any function in respect of the Irish Aid programme; the functions arranged for the former President’s visit; the persons who will be invitees at such functions; if the Government or his Department will bear the cost of such functions and the costs associated with travel and other expenses of the former President; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22592/06]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 253 and 254 together.

In July 2003, the Taoiseach signed a Memorandum of Understanding with the William J Clinton Presidential Foundation. This Memorandum of Understanding outlines a framework of cooperation between the Clinton Foundation and Irish Aid, to work in partnership with developing country governments and with other relevant international organisations on HIV/AIDS. The aim of the partnership is to provide financial and technical support to assist in the preparation of integrated HIV and AIDS treatment, care and prevention programmes in Africa.

The Government, through the aid programme, committed an amount of €50 million for the five year period 2003-7. These funds are not donated to the Clinton Foundation. They are directed at National HIV/AIDS Control programmes in highly affected countries, which the Foundation is also assisting.

The initial focus of this partnership is with the Government of Mozambique. An amount of €40 million has been approved to support the implementation of the HIV/AIDS Strategic Plan of the Ministry of Health from 2003-2007. To date an amount of €22 million has been released, with a balance of €6 million to be released later this year and €12 million is committed for 2007. These funds have facilitated the recruitment of a technical specialist by Irish Aid, whose role is to manage and oversee the effective use of these funds. We are currently exploring how the remainder of the total amount of funds committed can be directed at supporting the expansion of HIV service delivery in another country.

A mid term review of Ireland's Clinton Foundation Partnership in Mozambique has recently been undertaken. This has demonstrated that substantial early gains are being made. Under the leadership of the Government of Mozambique, Ireland and the Clinton Foundation have made a major contribution to that country's achievement in reaching, and in some cases exceeding its HIV related service targets. At the end of 2005, over 20,000 people were on anti-retroviral therapy; 75,000 women accessed services for the prevention of mother to child transmission; 270,000 people accessed voluntary HIV counselling and testing services and 35,000 people were receiving home based care.

President Clinton has indicated his wish to visit Ireland, possibly later this year, to discuss the partnership between his Foundation and the Government. No date has yet been agreed for the proposed visit.

Ireland is now one of the world's leading donors in the global fight against HIV/AIDS. Speaking at the UN General Assembly last week, the Taoiseach reaffirmed Ireland's political and financial commitment to the global HIV/AIDS response. He outlined how Ireland is spending the €100 million which has been allocated to HIV/AIDS and other diseases of poverty. He also called for renewed global leadership and a better resourced and focused response to HIV/AIDS.

Consular Services.

Finian McGrath

Ceist:

255 Mr. F. McGrath asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the position regarding the case of a person (details supplied) in Spain; and if he will advise on the situation with the Spanish authorities. [22637/06]

As I indicated in my previous reply to the Deputy on 3 May, 2006, the Embassy in Madrid has informed the Department that the person concerned has received appropriate legal representation, and understands that he is being accorded the same rights and treatment as a Spanish citizen.

On 5 May, 2006, a Consular Officer of the Embassy met with the individual concerned. She discussed again with him his complaints in relation to the Spanish judicial system, and, at his request, undertook to contact the appropriate Spanish authorities. She also explained the role of the Embassy and underlined to him the importance of following legal advice. The Consular Officer has since written to the person concerned regarding how he should register his complaints about the Spanish judicial system. I can assure the Deputy that the Embassy will continue to monitor developments in this case, will remain in contact with the person's lawyer and will continue to provide all appropriate consular assistance to him.

Travel Agreements.

Joe Costello

Ceist:

256 Mr. Costello asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the position in relation to travellers to the USA by air transport arising from the decision of the European Court of Justice to annul the EU-US agreement on the transfer of personal data to the US Bureau of Customs and Border Protection; the implications for Irish citizens travelling to the USA; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22685/06]

Following the terrorist attacks of 11 September 2001 in the United States, the US authorities enacted legislation providing that air carriers operating flights to, from and within United States territory would have to provide them with electronic access to the data contained in their reservation and departure systems. The information is described as "Passenger Name Records (PNR)".

The Agreement between the European Community and the United States on the processing and transfer of passenger name records data by air carriers to the United States Department of Homeland Security, Bureau of Customs and Border Protection was signed in Washington DC on 28 May 2004. It entered into effect on the same day. The Agreement was negotiated on behalf of the European Community by the European Commission, with the agreement of the Member States.

The Agreement establishes (i) the number and type of data which can be transferred, (ii) the length of time for which data can be retained, and (iii) the purposes for which data may be used: combating terrorism and international crime. The European Parliament, as is its prerogative, decided to refer this Agreement to the European Court of Justice seeking its annulment. On the basis of an opinion from the Court's Advocate General, the Court of Justice, in a judgment delivered on 30 May 2006, annulled the decision of the Council of Ministers. The Court decided that the legal basis used for the Council Decision approving the conclusion of the Agreement was not appropriate. For the same reason, the Court also annulled the Commission Decision to the effect that the information transferred was adequately protected by the United States.

The Court of Justice also decided that, since the Agreement remains applicable for a period of ninety days from the notification of its termination, for reasons of legal certainty and, in order to protect the persons concerned, it would preserve the effect of the Commission Decision until 30 September 2006. This means that the Agreement remains in effect and fully operational until 30 September 2006. This gives the Commission and the Member States time to find a solution. As a result, the position of travellers from the European Union to the United States remains unchanged for the present.

Ministerial Responsibilities.

Paul McGrath

Ceist:

257 Mr. P. McGrath asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the functions which have, since the last general election, been delegated to Ministers of State at his Department by the Government under powers conferred on it by Section 2 (1) of the Ministers and Secretaries (Amendment) (No. 2) Act 1977; and the statutory instrument number of each such order. [22833/06]

On 5 October, 2004 the Government, on the nomination of the Taoiseach and in exercise of the power conferred on them by Section 1 of the Ministers and Secretaries (Amendment) (No. 2) Act 1977, as amended by Section 2 of the Ministers and Secretaries (Amendment) Act 1980 and Section 1 of the Ministers and Secretaries (Amendment) Act 1995, assigned responsibility for European Affairs to Mr Noel Treacy, T.D., Minister of State. Also on that date, and under the same legislative provisions, the Government appointed Mr Conor Lenihan, T.D. to be a Minister of State at the Department of Foreign Affairs, with special responsibility for Overseas Development and Human Rights. No delegation orders in respect of the Ministers of State assigned to my Department have been made under Section 2 (1) of the Ministers and Secretaries (Amendment) (No. 2) Act, 1977.

Overseas Development Aid.

Phil Hogan

Ceist:

258 Mr. Hogan asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the manner in which she plans to consult with the Government and civil society here in respect of Ireland’s priority aid countries as part of the comprehensive review process of the ACP-EU Economic Partnership agreement negotiations; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22873/06]

The Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) will involve a major transformation of the relationship between the EU and the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) States. Cognisant of this, I have made the EPAs a priority since taking office almost two years ago.

I have spoken on the subject on numerous occasions, both in Dáil Éireann and at the meetings around the country to prepare for the forthcoming White Paper on Development Cooperation, where the public showed an active interest in the EPAs. I have also discussed EPAs on a number of occasions in my meetings with the NGO community.

As the EPAs appear on the agenda of the Council's Article 133 Committee, which is the EU's main official-level policy-making body in respect of international trade, they form part of the coordination process between my Department, the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment and the Department of Agriculture to prepare for meetings of this Committee.

At the Hong Kong WTO Ministerial meeting last December, I held bilateral meetings with our ACP Programme Countries, where they outlined their concerns about the EPAs. In view of these concerns, I have commissioned research on the fiscal impact of the EPAs, including on our Programme Countries. When the research work is complete, I would intend to share its findings with civil society and other interested parties. My Department is also planning a discussion of the work with the authors of the research in early July and will invite civil society representatives to attend.

Since trade is a Community competence, it is of course the European Commission that is undertaking the EPA negotiations on behalf of EU Member States, and the Commission that will also carry out the mid-term review, mandated by the 2000 Cotonou Agreement. At the April meeting of the General Affairs and External Relations Council (GAERC), which I attended, Ministers called on the Council to make the review "formal and comprehensive with participation from the ACP side". Ministers further asked that the review cover "both trade and development aspects of the EPAs, including cross-cutting issues affecting the development prospects of all ACP countries (e.g. market access and rules of origin, regulatory and safeguard provisions etc)" as well as "necessary measures to support the timely completion of the negotiations."

I welcome the valuable opportunity the EPA review will provide to take stock of progress to date and to address the concerns of our ACP partners. Ireland is keeping the negotiations under close scrutiny and we will continue to stress the need for the EPAs to be supportive of ACP countries' development needs and their poverty reduction efforts.

Departmental Expenditure.

Marian Harkin

Ceist:

259 Ms Harkin asked the Minister for Arts, Sport and Tourism if, further to his reply to this Deputy (details supplied), the €4.36 million reallocated from the tourism sub-measure in 2005 has been replaced by Exchequer funding; if some or all of this funding has been allocated in the Border Midland Western region; the details of same; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22420/06]

The overall level of funding available under Fáilte Ireland's Tourism Product Development Scheme is €49.165 million, of which €27.098 million is for allocation to projects in the BMW Region. This figure is comprised of €22.738 million of ERDF funding and, as outlined in the correspondence referred to by the Deputy, €4.36 million of Exchequer funding, the latter replacing ERDF funding re-allocated from the Tourism Measure in the BMW Regional Operational Programme.

The operation of the Tourism Product Development Scheme is solely a matter for Fáilte Ireland. However, I am informed by the Authority that progress under the Scheme is now well advanced and that, to date, full grant approvals amounting to €22.7 million have been made in respect of 37 projects in the BMW region. I am also informed that a number of projects currently under evaluation are expected to take up the balance of the funding available.

National Lottery Funding.

Dan Neville

Ceist:

260 Mr. Neville asked the Minister for Arts, Sport and Tourism the criteria for allocating grants under the National Lottery; and the reason an organisation (details supplied) from County Limerick did not meet this criteria. [22587/06]

The national lottery-funded Sports Capital Programme, which is administered by my Department, allocates funding to sporting and community organisations at local, regional and national level throughout the country.

All applications under the 2006 sports capital programme were evaluated by my Department in accordance with the assessment criteria for the programme published in the guidelines, terms and conditions document which accompanied the application form for the programme. Following completion of the evaluation of the applications received by my Department under the programme, I announced provisional grant allocations totalling €53.745 million to 707 applicants classified as local on 6th June last. I intend to announce the provisional allocations for the regional, municipal/multipurpose and national projects in due course.

The application from the organisation in question was unsuccessful and a letter advising them accordingly together with a copy of the assessment carried out on the application will be issued shortly. It is open to the organisation, should it wish to do so and should it have a project which satisfies the terms and conditions of the programme, to submit an application to the 2007 sports capital programme when that scheme is publicly advertised.

Arts Funding.

Caoimhghín Ó Caoláin

Ceist:

261 Caoimhghín Ó Caoláin asked the Minister for Arts, Sport and Tourism the prospects for a new and enhanced capital grant scheme for new theatre builds and upgrades; his Department’s intentions regarding the proposed development of a garage theatre facility in Monaghan town; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22631/06]

The main vehicle for capital funding through my Department is the Arts & Culture Capital Enhancement Support Scheme (ACCESS), under which almost €43 million was provided for arts and cultural facilities around the country. This scheme commenced in 2001 but many projects are still in the course of completion. At present the funds available under the ACCESS scheme have been fully allocated. It is hoped to shortly make an announcement regarding a possible successor to the ACCESS scheme. Applications for any such scheme will be invited by public advertisement.

Fergus O'Dowd

Ceist:

262 Mr. O’Dowd asked the Minister for Arts, Sport and Tourism the reason for the establishment of the Music Board; the original aims and objectives of the board; the board’s achievements; his views on whether the board achieved its original aims and objectives; the reason same was disbanded and if he will reconstitute the board; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22651/06]

Fergus O'Dowd

Ceist:

263 Mr. O’Dowd asked the Minister for Arts, Sport and Tourism the supports that presently exist for musicians; the support initiatives he intends to offer to musicians; the financial supports he presently offers to classical musicians, Irish music, opera, rock, pop musicians and so on; the way in which he will improve them; if he will encourage more musicians to record on Irish music labels; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22652/06]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 262 and 263 together.

The Music Board of Ireland was established on an interim basis in May, 2001 by the then Minister for Arts, Heritage, Gaeltacht, and the Islands, Síle de Valera, T.D. The Mandate given to the Board was:- to act as a forum for the industry; to devise and actively promote strategic policies for the development of the industry and the maximisation of its contribution to the national economy; to assist Government and its agencies in their efforts to develop the industry.

The interim Board was established on the basis that the then Department of Arts, Heritage, Gaeltacht, and the Islands, and IBEC, would fund the costs arising on a 50:50 basis for 3 years. During this three-year period the Board was to prepare a strategic plan for the development of the music industry in Ireland, which was to inform a decision on whether the Board should be established on a more permanent or statutorybasis.

The draft strategy delivered by the Board in November 2002 was carefully considered in my Department, but the end conclusion was that it was not satisfactorily demonstrated that the benefits accruing from the suite of programmes and activities proposed by the interim Board would be commensurate with the costs involved. Accordingly, it was decided not to proceed to statutory establishment, and the Board was not renewed beyond its initial three-year term of office. I have no plans to re-establish theBoard.

All music genres continue to fall within the remit of the Arts Council — the main channel through which State aid is provided to the arts. The Council is statutorily independent in the disbursement of its funds. This year, I was pleased to be in a position to make an amount of €72.31m available to the Arts Council, an increase of 9% on the 2005 figure.

Michael D. Higgins

Ceist:

264 Mr. M. Higgins asked the Minister for Arts, Sport and Tourism the present location and proposals for the future location of the national art collection (details supplied) which has been on display at the Great Southern Hotels for 50 years and which has been removed; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22708/06]

Jack Wall

Ceist:

265 Mr. Wall asked the Minister for Arts, Sport and Tourism if his attention has been drawn to the fact that famous paintings (details supplied) purchased by CIE with 50 percent State funding may be lost to the nation due to the fact that these paintings are to be sold by public auction by the Great Southern Hotel Group; the position of his Department in regard to the sale of such works; the means of ensuring the retention of the works for the nation; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22719/06]

Jack Wall

Ceist:

266 Mr. Wall asked the Minister for Arts, Sport and Tourism the mechanism he will put in place to ensure the protection of State funding used for the purchase of works of art that have been on display in the Great Southern Hotels for the past 50 years and to be put for auction; his responsibility in regard to the protection of such funding; if he will direct the Arts Council to seek recompense for such grants; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22720/06]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 264 to 266, inclusive, together.

The Arts Council is a statutory body under my Department's aegis, and is the principal channel through which State support is directed to the Arts. The Council is operationally independent of my Department, but it is understood from the Council that there are 143 works in the collection in question, which were jointly funded under the Arts Council's Joint Purchase Scheme. These works include works by Gerard Dillon, Patrick Collins, Louis le Brocquy and Basil Blackshaw. These were purchased primarily in the 1960s and 1970s, at a cost to the Council of £7,233. The total cost of these works came to £14,466.71.

The Arts Council is aware of the potential issues arising from the sale of these works and is in touch with the CEO of the Great Southern Hotel Group in this regard. On my instructions, my Department has also brought the matter to the attention of the CEO of the Dublin Airport Authority and has asked for a report on the matter. I understand that potential vendors are obliged to notify such intended sales to the OPW so that first option of such items may be exercised by the state collection institutions.

Sports Capital Programme.

Bernard J. Durkan

Ceist:

267 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for Arts, Sport and Tourism if funding can or will be offered to a community centre (details supplied) in County Kildare towards provision of youth facilities and storage; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22806/06]

The national lottery-funded sports capital programme, which is administered by my Department, allocates funding to sporting and community organisations at local, regional and national level throughout the country. The programme is advertised on an annual basis.

Applications for funding under the 2006 programme were invited through advertisements in the Press on November 27th and 28th last. The closing date for receipt of applications was January 20th 2006. A total of 1,338 applications were received costing a total of €670 million and for which funding of €312 million was sought. All of these applications were evaluated against the programme's detailed assessment criteria, which are outlined in the guidelines, terms and conditions of the programme. I announced provisional grant allocations totalling €53.745 million to 707 applicants classified as local on 6th June last. I intend to announce the provisional allocations for the regional, municipal/multipurpose and national projects in due course.

In relation to the organisation in question, an application for funding was not received under the 2006 programme. It is open to the organisation, should it wish to do so and should it have a project which satisfies the terms and conditions of the programme, to submit an application to the 2007 sports capital programme when that scheme is publicly advertised.

Ministerial Responsibilities.

Paul McGrath

Ceist:

268 Mr. P. McGrath asked the Minister for Arts, Sport and Tourism the functions which have, since the last general election, been delegated to Ministers of State at his Department by the Government under powers conferred on it by Section 2 (1) of the Ministers and Secretaries (Amendment) (No. 2) Act 1977; and the statutory instrument number of each such order. [22834/06]

No functions have been delegated under the Ministers and Secretaries (Amendment) (No. 2) Act 1977 in the case of my Department.

Work Permits.

Kathleen Lynch

Ceist:

269 Ms Lynch asked the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment if workers from non-EU countries are eligible for new work permits; if so, the trades and skills which are eligible; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22326/06]

In the aftermath of EU enlargement, it is Government policy that employers should be able to source nearly all of their workforce needs from within the EU. Accordingly, work permits are only considered in respect of highly skilled and highly paid positions, where the employer has made meaningful attempts to find EEA nationals first. There is currently a list of ineligible occupations on my Department's website www.entemp.ie. An employer may check this list to determine whether the position he wishes to fill is eligible or not.

Industrial Disputes.

Caoimhghín Ó Caoláin

Ceist:

270 Caoimhghín Ó Caoláin asked the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment further to Parliamentary Question No. 397 of 30 May 2006, if his Department will cover the cost of hiring interpreters for migrant workers pursuing a claim against their employer through the Labour Relations Commission, the Labour Court or the Employment Appeals Tribunal. [22406/06]

The Labour Relations Commission, the Labour Court and the Employment Appeals Tribunal are independent statutory bodies which act independently in carrying out their functions. The procedures to be followed including the hiring of interpreters in individual cases is a matter for these bodies.

Departmental Investigations.

James Breen

Ceist:

271 Mr. J. Breen asked the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment if he will instigate an investigation into the management and operation of a construction site (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22422/06]

With regard to the issue of stranded cattle I wish to inform the Deputy that it is not within the remit of the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment to undertake an investigation.

The issue of late payments in respect of sub-contractors is addressed by the European Communities (Late Payment in Commercial Transactions) Regulations 2002 (S.I. No. 388 of 2002). These Regulations, which came into operation on the August 7th 2002, apply to all commercial transactions with the following exceptions:

• Contracts made before August 7th 2002

• Claims for payment of late interest of less than €5

• Transactions with consumers

• Debts that may be subject to legislation other than these Regulations.

In accordance with these Regulations, it is an implied term of every commercial transaction that where a purchaser does not pay for goods or services by the relevant payment date, the supplier shall be entitled to interest ("late payment interest") on the amount outstanding. The current interest rate applicable is 9.25% per annum or 0.0253% per day. This rate is set as at January 1st and July 1st each year at a rate of 7 percentage points above the European Central Bank interest rate on its most recent main re-financing operation. In the absence of any agreed payment date between the parties, late payment interest falls due after 30 days have elapsed.

In addition, the use of terms that are grossly unfair may be unenforceable and such terms may be challenged in Court on the basis of criteria specified in the Regulations. Organisations representing small and medium sized enterprises may also challenge any terms that they feel breach the Regulations.

Grocery Industry.

Denis Naughten

Ceist:

272 Mr. Naughten asked the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment his plans to introduce legislation to control abuses of dominance within the supermarket sector; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22439/06]

As I have already said many times in this House, the abuse of dominance is already specifically prohibited by Section 5 of the Competition Act 2002 and by Article 82 of the EU Treaty.

However, in the light of concerns expressed by some contributors to the public consultation process on the Groceries Order last year that certain anti-competitive practices might develop in the trade if the Groceries Order were abolished, I have asked the Competition Authority to monitor the sector following the repeal of the Order in March.

The Authority is putting in place a monitoring mechanism to track data and trends over the coming months and years and it will keep my Department informed of developments.

Work Permits.

Pat Breen

Ceist:

273 Mr. P. Breen asked the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment the number of employees of a company (details supplied) working on the Ennis bypass in Ennis, County Clare who have failed to have work permits renewed since December 2005; the number of employees of the company working on the same project who have had their work permits renewed; the working grades of those who have not had their work permits renewed; the reason such permits were not renewed; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22686/06]

My Department advised this company some time ago that it would be unable to deal with any work permit applications from it until such time as information showing that former employees had received their financial entitlements from their employer was lodged with my Department. Papers purporting to show that the company has discharged the financial obligations to employees were lodged with my Department last week. This documentation is currently being examined by my Department.

Jerry Cowley

Ceist:

274 Dr. Cowley asked the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment when a work permit will be made available to a person (details supplied) in County Mayo; the reason there is a delay in this area; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22797/06]

The Work Permits Section of my Department has informed me that it has no record of any valid application, given the details supplied, in this instance.

Ministerial Responsibilities.

Paul McGrath

Ceist:

275 Mr. P. McGrath asked the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment the functions which have, since the last general election, been delegated to Ministers of State at his Department by the Government under powers conferred on it by Section 2 (1) of the Ministers and Secretaries (Amendment) (No. 2) Act 1977; and the statutory instrument number of each such order. [22835/06]

The material requested by the Deputy is presented in two sections; Section one being the delegation orders relating to the Minister of State for Trade and Commerce and Section two being those that relate to the Minister for Labour Affairs. Within each section, the material is presented in chronological order. Section one.

1. On the 15th April 2003, Ministerial Functions were delegated, by the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade & Employment Mary Harney T.D., to Minister of State Michael Ahern, T.D. who has responsibility for Trade and Commerce, under the Enterprise, Trade and Employment (Delegation of Ministerial Functions) Order (S.I. No 157 of 2003) in respect of the following pieces of legislation:

SCHEDULE

Part 1

•Partnership Act 1890 (53 & 54 Vict. c. 39)

•Industrial and Provident Societies Acts 1893 to 1978

•Friendly Societies Acts 1896 to 1977

•Limited Partnerships Act 1907 (7 Edw. 7. c.24)

•Assurance Companies Act 1909 (9 Edw. 7. c.49)

•Local Authorities (Mutual Assurance) Act 1926 (No. 34 of 1926)

•Perpetual Funds (Registration) Act 1933 (No. 22 of 1933)

•Control of Imports Acts 1934 to 1964

•Oil Burners (Standards) Act 1960 (No. 24 of 1960)

•Restriction of Imports Act 1962 (No. 20 of 1962)

•Registration of Business Names Act 1963 (No. 30 of 1963)

•Companies Acts 1963 to 2001 (other than Part II of the Companies Act 1990 (as amended by the Company Law Enforcement Act 2001) (No. 28 of 2001) or Part 2 (sections 7-18), section 34, or Part 7 (sections 67-71) of the Company Law Enforcement Act 2001)

•Control of Exports Act 1983 (No. 35 of 1983)

•Designated Investment Funds Act 1985 (No. 16 of 1985)

•Unit Trusts Act 1990 (No. 37 of 1990)

•Patents Act 1992 (No. 1 of 1992)

•Investment Limited Partnerships Act 1994 (No. 24 of 1994)

•Stock Exchange Act 1995 (No. 9 of 1995)

•Trade Marks Act 1996 (No. 6 of 1996)

•Metrology Act 1996 (No. 27 of 1996)

•National Standards Authority of Ireland Act 1996 (No. 28 of 1996)

•Irish Takeover Panel Act 1997 (No. 5 of 1997)

•Credit Union Act 1997 (No. 15 of 1997)

•Copyright and Related Rights Act 2000 (No. 28 of 2000)

•Industrial Designs Act 2001 (No. 39 of 2001)

Part 2

•Decimal Currency (Friendly Society and Industrial Assurance Contracts) Regulations 1971 (S.I. No. 64 of 1971)

•European Communities (Stock Exchange) Regulations 1984 (S.I. No. 282 of 1984)

•European Communities (Mergers and Divisions of Companies) Regulations 1987 (S.I. No. 137 of 1987)

•European Communities (European Economic Interest Groupings) Regulations 1989 (S.I. No. 191 of 1989)

•European Communities (Quantitative Analysis of Binary and Ternary Fibre Mixtures) Regulations 1990 (S.I. No. 275 of 1990)

•European Communities (Companies: Group Accounts) Regulations 1992 (S.I. No. 201 of 1992)

•European Communities (Transferable Securities and Stock Exchange) Regulations 1992 (S.I No. 202 of 1992)

•European Communities (Low Voltage Electrical Equipment) Regulations 1992 (S.I. No. 428 of 1992)

•European Communities (Prohibition of Satisfaction of Certain Contractual Claims arising from Trade Sanctions against Libya) Regulations 1993 (S.I. No. 385 of 1993)

•European Communities (Further Discontinuation of Certain Trade with Serb-Controlled Areas of Bosnia-Herzegovina) Regulations 1995 (S.I. No. 163 of 1995)

•European Communities (Trade with Iraq) Regulations 1997 (S.I. No. 370 of 1997)

•European Communities (Interruption of Certain Economic Relations with Angola) Regulations 1998 (S.I. No. 503 of 1998)

•European Communities (Prohibition on the Sale, Supply, and Export to Burma/Myanmar of Equipment which might be used for Internal Repression or Terrorism) Regulations 2000 (S.I. No. 299 of 2000)

•European Communities (Control of Exports of Dual-Use Items) Regulations 2000 (S.I. No. 317 of 2000)

•Customs-Free Airport (Extension of Laws) Regulations 2000 (S.I. No. 430 of 2000)

•European Communities (Prohibition of the Export of Certain Goods and Services to Afghanistan and Strengthening of the Flight Ban) Regulations 2001 (S.I. No. 417 of 2001)

•European Communities (Prohibition of the Export of Certain Goods and Services to Afghanistan and Strengthening of the Flight Ban) (Amendment) Regulations 2001 (S.I. No. 467 of 2001)

•European Communities (Prohibition of the Export of Certain Goods and Services to Afghanistan and Strengthening of the Flight Ban) (Amendment) (No. 2) Regulations 2001 (S.I. No. 547 of 2001)

•European Communities (Prohibition of the Export of Certain Goods and Services to Zimbabwe) Regulations 2002 (S.I. No. 129 of 2002)

•European Communities (Prohibition on the Importation into the Community of Rough Diamonds from Sierra Leone) Regulations 2002 (S.I. No. 139 of 2002)

•European Communities (Restrictive Measures) (Liberia) Regulations 2002 (S.I. No. 438 of 2002)

•European Communities (Control of Exports of Dual-Use Items) (Amendment) Regulations 2002 (S.I. No. 512 of 2002)

•European Communities (Trade with Iraq) (Amendment) Regulations 2002 (S.I. No. 523 of 2002)

2. On 7th December 2004, Ministerial Functions were delegated to Minister of State Michael Ahern, T.D. who was re-assigned responsibility for Trade and Commerce, by the Minister for Enterprise, Trade & Employment Micheál Martin T.D. under the Enterprise, Trade and Employment (Delegation of Ministerial Functions (No. 2) Order 2004 (S.I. No 808 of 2004) under the following pieces of legislation:

Enactments

•Partnership Act 1890 (53 & 54 Vict. c. 39)

•Industrial and Provident Societies Acts 1893 to 1978

•Friendly Societies Acts 1896 to 1977

•Limited Partnerships Act 1907 (7 Edw. 7. c.24)

•Assurance Companies Act 1909 (9 Edw. 7. c.49)

•Local Authorities (Mutual Assurance) Act 1926 (No. 34 of 1926)

•Perpetual Funds (Registration) Act 1933 (No. 22 of 1933)

•Control of Imports Acts 1934 to 1964

•Oil Burners (Standards) Act 1960 (No. 24 of 1960)

•Restriction of Imports Act 1962 (No. 20 of 1962)

•Registration of Business Names Act 1963 (No. 30 of 1963)

•Companies Acts 1963 to 2003 (other than sections 19 to 23 of the Companies Act, 1990 (No. 33 of 1990) and section 34 of the Company Law Enforcement Act 2001 (No. 28 of 2001))

•Packaged Goods (Quantity Control) Act 1980 (No. 11 of 1980)

•Control of Exports Act 1983 (No. 35 of 1983)

•Designated Investment Funds Act 1985 (No. 16 of 1985)

•Unit Trusts Act 1990 (No. 37 of 1990)

•Patents Act 1992 (No. 1 of 1992)

•Investment Limited Partnerships Act 1994 (No. 24 of 1994)

•Stock Exchange Act 1995 (No. 9 of 1995)

•Trade Marks Act 1996 (No. 6 of 1996)

•Metrology Act 1996 (No. 27 of 1996)

•National Standards Authority of Ireland Act 1996 (No. 28 of 1996)

•Irish Takeover Panel Act 1997 (No. 5 of 1997)

•Credit Union Act 1997 (No. 15 of 1997)

•Copyright and Related Rights Act 2000 (No. 28 of 2000)

•Industrial Designs Act 2001 (No. 39 of 2001)

Instruments

•Decimal Currency (Friendly Society and Industrial Assurance Contracts) Regulations 1971 (S.I. No. 64 of 1971)

•European Communities (Stock Exchange) Regulations 1984 (S.I. No. 282 of 1984)

•European Communities (Mergers and Divisions of Companies) Regulations 1987 (S.I. No. 137 of 1987)

•European Communities (European Economic Interest Groupings) Regulations 1989 (S.I. No. 191 of 1989)

•European Communities (Quantitative Analysis of Binary and Ternary Fibre Mixtures) Regulations 1990 (S.I. No. 275 of 1990)

•European Communities (Companies: Group Accounts) Regulations 1992 (S.I. No. 201 of 1992)

•European Communities (Transferable Securities and Stock Exchange) Regulations 1992 (S.I. No. 202 of 1992)

•European Communities (Low Voltage Electrical Equipment) Regulations 1992 (S.I. No. 428 of 1992)

•European Communities (Prohibition of Satisfaction of Certain Contractual Claims arising from Trade Sanctions against Libya) Regulations 1993 (S.I. No. 385 of 1993)

•European Communities (Further Discontinuation of Certain Trade with Serb-Controlled Areas of Bosnia-Herzegovina) Regulations 1995 (S.I. No. 163 of 1995)

•European Communities (Trade with Iraq) Regulations 1997 (S.I. No. 370 of 1997)

•European Communities (Authorised Agencies) (Issue of Certificates of Origin) Regulations 1998 (S.I. No. 318 of 1998)

•European Communities (Interruption of Certain Economic Relations with Angola) Regulations 1998 (S.I. No. 503 of 1998)

•European Communities (Prohibition on the Sale, Supply, and Export to Burma/Myanmar of Equipment which might be used for Internal Repression or Terrorism) Regulations 2000 (S.I. No. 299 of 2000)

•European Communities (Control of Exports of Dual-Use Items) Regulations 2000 (S.I. No. 317 of 2000)

•Customs-Free Airport (Extension of Laws) Regulations 2000 (S.I. No. 430 of 2000)

•European Communities (Prohibition of the Export of Certain Goods and Services to Afghanistan and Strengthening of the Flight Ban) Regulations 2001 (S.I. No. 417 of 2001)

•European Communities (Prohibition of the Export of Certain Goods and Services to Afghanistan and Strengthening of the Flight Ban) (Amendment) Regulations 2001 (S.I. No. 467 of 2001)

•European Communities (Prohibition of the Export of Certain Goods and Services to Afghanistan and Strengthening of the Flight Ban) (Amendment) (No. 2) Regulations 2001 (S.I. No. 547 of 2001)

•European Communities (Prohibition of the Export of Certain Goods and Services to Zimbabwe) Regulations 2002 (S.I. No. 129 of 2002)

•European Communities (Prohibition on the Importation into the Community of Rough Diamonds from Sierra Leone) Regulations 2002 (S.I. No. 139 of 2002)

•European Communities (Restrictive Measures) (Liberia) Regulations 2002 (S.I. No. 438 of 2002)

•European Communities (Control of Exports of Dual-Use Items) (Amendment) Regulations 2002 (S.I. No. 512 of 2002)

•European Communities (Trade with Iraq) (Amendment) Regulations 2002 (S.I. No. 523 of 2002)

•European Communities (Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities) Regulations 2003 (S.I. No. 211 of 2003)

•European Communities (Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities) (Amendment) Regulations 2003 (S.I. No. 212 of 2003);

•European Communities (Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities) (Amendment No. 2) Regulations 2003 (S.I. No. 497 of 2003)

•European Communities (Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities) (Amendment No. 4) Regulations 2003 (S.I. No. 737 of 2003)

•European Communities (Directive 2000/31/EC) Regulations 2003 (S.I. No. 68)

•European Communities (Directive 2000/31/EC) (Amendment) Regulations (S.I. No. 490 of 2004)

3. In addition, on 18th October, 2005, under the Enterprise, Trade and Employment (Delegation of Ministerial Functions) (No. 2) Order 2005 (S.I. No. 635 of 2005), the Ministerial Functions under the Investment Funds, Companies and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 2005 (No. 12 of 2005) were also delegated to Minister of State Michael Ahern T.D. by the Minister for Enterprise, Trade & Employment, Micheál Martin, T.D.

Section Two

4. On the 15th April 2003, Ministerial Functions were delegated, by the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade & Employment Mary Harney T.D., to Minister of State Frank Fahey, T.D. who had responsibility for Labour Affairs, under the Enterprise, Trade and Employment (Delegation of Ministerial Functions) Order (S.I. No 156 of 2003) in respect of the following pieces of legislation:

SCHEDULE

Part 1

•Trade Union Acts 1871 to 1990

•Boiler Explosion Acts 1882 and 1890

•Payment of Wages in Public Houses Prohibition Act 1883 (46 & 47 Vict. c. 31)

•Industrial Relations Acts 1946 to 2001

•Safety in Industry Acts 1955 and 1980

•Mines and Quarries Act 1965 (No. 7 of 1965)

•Redundancy Payments Acts 1967 to 2001

•Employment Agency Act 1971 (No. 27 of 1971)

•Dangerous Substances Acts 1972 and 1979

•Minimum Notice and Terms of Employment Acts 1973 to 2001

•Protection of Employment Act 1977 (No. 7 of 1977)

•Unfair Dismissals Acts 1977 to 2001

•Protection of Employees (Employers' Insolvency) Acts 1984 to 2001

•Safety, Health and Welfare (Offshore Installations) Act 1987 (No. 18 of 1987)

•Safety, Health and Welfare at Work Act 1989 (No. 7 of 1989)

•Payment of Wages Act 1991 (No. 25 of 1991)

•Terms of Employment (Information) Acts 1994 and 2001

•Protection of Young Persons (Employment) Act 1996 (No. 16 of 1996)

•Transnational Information and Consultation of Employees Act 1996 (No. 20 of 1996)

•Organisation of Working Time Act 1997 (No. 20 of 1997)

•Chemical Weapons Act 1997 (No. 28 of 1997)

•Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road Act 1998 (No. 43 of 1998)

•National Minimum Wage Act 2000 (No. 5 of 2000)

•Carer's Leave Act 2001 (No. 19 of 2001)

•Protection of Employees (Part-Time Work) Act 2001 (No. 45 of 2001)

Part 2

•European Communities (Safeguarding of Employees' Rights on Transfer of Undertakings) Regulations 1980 (S.I. No. 306 of 1980)

•European Communities (Safeguarding of Employees' Rights on Transfer of Undertakings) (Amendment) Regulations 2000 (S.I. No. 487 of 2000)

•European Communities (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2000 (S.I. No. 488 of 2000)

5. On 7th December, 2004, Ministerial Functions were delegated, by the Minister for Enterprise, Trade & Employment Micheál Martin T.D., to Minister of State Tony Killeen, T.D. who has responsibility for Labour Affairs, under the Enterprise, Trade and Employment (Delegation of Ministerial Functions) Order 2004 (S.I. No. 809 of 2004) in respect of the following pieces of legislation:

Enactments

•Trade Union Acts 1871 to 1990

•Conspiracy and Protection of Property Act, 1875

•Boiler Explosion Acts 1882 and 1890

•Payment of Wages in Public Houses Prohibition Act 1883 (46 & 47 Vict. c. 31)

•Industrial Relations Acts 1946 to 2004

•Safety in Industry Acts 1955 and 1980

•Mines and Quarries Act 1965 (No. 7 of 1965)

•Redundancy Payments Acts 1967 to 2003

•Employment Agency Act 1971 (No. 27 of 1971)

•Dangerous Substances Acts 1972 and 1979

•Minimum Notice and Terms of Employment Acts 1973 to 2001

•Protection of Employment Act 1977 (No. 7 of 1977)

•Workers' Participation Acts 1977-1988

•Unfair Dismissals Acts 1977 to 2001

•Protection of Employees (Employers' Insolvency) Acts 1984 to 2004

•Safety, Health and Welfare (Offshore Installations) Act 1987 (No. 18 of 1987)

•Safety, Health and Welfare at Work Act 1989 (No. 7 of 1989)

•Payment of Wages Act 1991 (No. 25 of 1991)

•Terms of Employment (Information) Acts 1994 and 2001

•Protection of Young Persons (Employment) Act 1996 (No. 16 of 1996)

•Trans-national Information and Consultation of Employees Act 1996 (No. 20 of 1996)

•Organisation of Working Time Act 1997 (No. 20 of 1997)

•Chemical Weapons Act 1997 (No. 28 of 1997)

•Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road Act 1998 (No. 43 of 1998)

•National Minimum Wage Act 2000 (No. 5 of 2000)

•Carer's Leave Act 2001 (No. 19 of 2001)

•Protection of Employees (Part-Time Work) Act 2001 (No. 45 of 2001)

•Protection of Employees (Fixed-Term Work) Act 2003 (No. 29 of 2003)

Instruments

•European Communities (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2000 (S.I. No. 488 of 2000); and

•European Communities (Protection of Employees on Transfer of Undertakings) Regulations 2003 (S.I. No. 131 of 2003).

6. In addition, on 28th June, 2005, under the Enterprise, Trade and Employment (Delegation of Ministerial Functions) (No. 2) Order 2004, (S.I. No. 316 of 2005), the powers and duties of Micheál Martin T.D. Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment under the Safety, Health and Welfare at Work Act 2005 (No. 10 of 2005) were also delegated to Minister of State Killeen.

Social Welfare Benefits.

Tony Gregory

Ceist:

276 Mr. Gregory asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the reason a person (details supplied) in Dublin 3 who is a diabetic was refused a dietary allowance; and if same will be reviewed. [22335/06]

Recipients of Social Welfare or Health Service Executive payments who have been prescribed a special diet as a result of a specified medical condition, and whose means are insufficient to meet their needs, may qualify for a diet supplement under the supplementary welfare allowance scheme. This scheme and related supplements are administered on my behalf by the Community Welfare division of the Health Service Executive (HSE), and neither I nor my Department has any function in relation to individual claim decisions.

The amount of supplement payable depends on which category of diet has been prescribed by the applicant's medical advisor, as well as the income of the individual and his/her dependents.

The Dublin/Mid-Leinster Area of the HSE has advised that the person concerned had been prescribed a diabetic diet, and applied to the Executive for a diet supplement in February 2005. In accordance with the regulations governing the scheme then, diet supplement was not payable on means grounds. This is because the cost of the prescribed diet was less than one third of his income. The Executive further advised the person concerned of his right to appeal against this decision to its Area Appeals Officer.

My Department commissioned a study by an expert from the Irish Nutrition and Dietetic Institute to inform a modernisation of the scheme. This study recommended a new framework for classifying various diets and I have introduced a revised diet supplement scheme and regulations which take account of the findings and recommendations of the study. Under the revised scheme, which came into operation in April of this year, diabetes is not classified as requiring one of the new prescribed diets but can be dealt with within a healthy eating diet, the cost of which is expected to be met from one third of the basic payment.

Bernard J. Durkan

Ceist:

277 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if review of rent assistance will be undertaken in the case of a person (details supplied) in County Kildare; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22350/06]

The supplementary welfare allowance scheme, which includes rent supplement, is administered on my behalf by the Community Welfare division of the Health Service Executive. Neither I nor my Department has any function in relation to decisions on individual claims.

The Health Service Executive has advised that the correct rate of rent supplement is in payment based on the information it has concerning the person's income. The Executive has further advised that it will review the rent supplement claim of the person concerned as part of a general review of rent supplements in the area. It will contact the person concerned regarding this review shortly.

Brendan Howlin

Ceist:

278 Mr. Howlin asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs if his attention has been drawn to the anomaly within the carer’s respite grant where unpaid carers (details supplied) in County Wexford not in receipt of carers allowance are also not entitled to the respite grant. [22702/06]

The question refers to a situation where a person is not eligible for the respite care grant because she is employed for more than 15 hours per week.

From June 2005, the annual respite care grant was extended to all carers who are providing full-time care to a person who needs such care regardless of their income or whether they are in receipt of carer's allowance or carer's benefit. This arrangement was introduced to acknowledge the needs of carers especially in relation to respite. In Budget 2006, provision was made to increase the amount of the respite care grant from €1,000 to €1,200, from this month.

The full-time care and attention requirements for carer's allowance were relaxed from August 1999 to introduce greater flexibility into the carer's allowance scheme, while still safeguarding the needs and interests of care recipients. This allowed carers to work for up to 10 hours per week and it was introduced in recognition of the economic and therapeutic values of work. It also allows carers to maintain contact with the labour market.

From 1 June this year I extended the number of hours a carer can work to 15 hours per week. This applies to carer's allowance, carer's benefit and respite care grant. The care recipient must continue to receive full-time care and attention and be adequately cared for in the carer's absence.

The carer's allowance means test has been also eased significantly in the past few years, most notably with the introduction of disregards of spouses' earnings. Provision was made in Budget 2006 to increase the income disregard on the carer's allowance means test to €290 per week for a single person and to €580 per week for a couple from April this year. This ensures that a couple with two children can earn up to €32,925 per annum and still receive the maximum rate of carer's allowance. The same couple may earn up to €54,400 and receive the minimum rate of carer's allowance as well as the free travel, the household benefits package and the respite care grant.

Departmental Staff.

Paul Connaughton

Ceist:

279 Mr. Connaughton asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the allowance paid to the office provider for the social welfare office at Ballinasloe, County Galway for the past nine years; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22872/06]

There are currently 66 Social Welfare Branch Offices at various locations throughout the country. Each Branch Office is operated and managed by a Branch Manager who is required to act as an agent for the Department in the area served by the office.

Under the terms and conditions of their appointment Branch Managers are required to provide suitable premises and such clerical support as may be necessary for the satisfactory performance of the work of the Department.

Branch Managers' remuneration is calculated having regard to the claim load of the particular office. The remuneration paid to the Branch Manager in Ballinasloe for 2005, i.e. the last complete year available, was €119,367. Since being appointed to the position in September 1996, the Manager has received total gross payments amounting to €1,066,937.

Disabled Drivers.

John Cregan

Ceist:

280 Mr. Cregan asked the Minister for Transport if he has plans to amend the present guidelines governing the issuing of disabled drivers’ car permits, to include people with other severe disabilities of the upper limbs and body; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22331/06]

Currently, the permits are intended to reserve the use of designated parking bays to persons who are suffering from a disability that prevents the person from walking or causes undue hardship to the person in walking. I do not propose to extend the eligibility criteria for the issue of disabled persons' parking permits.

Driving Licenses.

Róisín Shortall

Ceist:

281 Ms Shortall asked the Minister for Transport the number of full driving licence holders by age. [22798/06]

The Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government who hold and administer the National Driver File has advised that the breakdown of full driving licence holders by age at 31st December, 2005 is as follows:

Age

Driving Licence Holders

Under 17

38

17 — 19

11,053

20 — 24

102,184

25 — 29

207,959

30 — 34

247,054

35 — 39

236,207

40 — 44

228,549

45 — 49

209,930

50 — 54

186,210

55 — 59

165,722

60 — 64

131,504

65 — 69

95,983

70 — 74

62,098

75 — 79

38,904

80 — 84

18,284

85 and over

6,254

Róisín Shortall

Ceist:

282 Ms Shortall asked the Minister for Transport the number of one year category B provisional licences issued in the past three years for which figures are available. [22799/06]

The Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government who hold and administer the National Driver File has advised that the number of one year category B provisional licences at 31 December in each of the past three years is as follows:

Year

Amount

2003

47,157

2004

52,061

2005

54,921

Public Transport.

Kathleen Lynch

Ceist:

283 Ms Lynch asked the Minister for Transport if his attention has been drawn to the concerns of those who lobby on behalf of people with disabilities (details supplied) that one in three ramps on the Dublin Bus fleet are not working; if he is confident that Dublin Bus is adhering to his Department’s sectoral plan for accessible public transport; if he will extend the remit of the Public Transport Accessibility Committee to a role of monitoring and examining such concerns; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22291/06]

I understand from Dublin Bus that it has in operation a programme of inspection for its bus ramps, that defects with the ramp mechanism are to be reported on a daily basis and repaired as quickly as possible. Dublin Bus also informs me that it will take immediate action on comments from any member of the public who highlight instances of ramps not working. In the light of the Deputy's question, I have referred the concerns raised to the company for consideration and for reply to her direct.

The Department of Transport's Sectoral Plan under the Disability Act 2005 is now in draft format and is undergoing a final consultation process prior to being completed and presented to the Houses of the Oireachtas by end July 2006, as required by the Act. Dublin Bus has co-operated fully in the development of those sections of the Draft Plan which relate to its services.

Dublin Bus is a member of the Public Transport Accessibility Committee whose remit will be expanded under the Department's Sectoral Plan to include a monitoring role in relation to progress by the agencies under the aegis of the Department in implementing the Sectoral Plan and evaluating the impact of the Plan on people with mobility, sensory and cognitive impairments.

Road Safety.

Pat Breen

Ceist:

284 Mr. P. Breen asked the Minister for Transport further to Parliamentary Question No. 437 of 30 May 2006, the number of fatal and non-fatal accidents in County Clare in 2005; the number of same which occurred in areas in which the speed limit is 100 kph; the number of same which occurred at junctions and turning points; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22310/06]

Statistics relating to road accidents, based on information provided by the Garda Síochána, are currently published by the National Roads Authority (NRA) in their annual Road Accident Facts reports. The most recent report, now entitled "Road Collision Facts", relates to 2004 and is available in the Oireachtas Library and on the NRA website. Statistics relating to 2005 are not yet published.

I am informed that statistics are not currently compiled in such a way as to identify the number of accidents that occurred in areas in which the speed limit is 100 kph, and the number which occurred at junctions and turning points.

Departmental Correspondence.

Tony Gregory

Ceist:

285 Mr. Gregory asked the Minister for Transport his views on the issues raised in the correspondence (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22337/06]

Transport 21 provides for a city-centre link between the Luas Green and Red Lines (Line BX), with a subsequent extension northwards (Line D) serving Broadstone and connecting with the Maynooth suburban rail line around Liffey Junction. The target date for completion of the full project is 2012.

The RPA commenced a public consultation process in respect of Line BX, focusing initially on the challenge of selecting the best overall route option for the line, last November. This process is still underway. Planning and design on Line D is at a much less developed stage.

I understand that the RPA have considered the suggestion of progressing Luas Line D at the same time as Line BX. They have indicated that the most efficient manner in which to progress Line D would be to initiate public consultation focusing on Line D soon after a preferred route option has been selected for the city centre link, Line BX.

The RPA will continue to keep the options for advancing the overall project under review.

Public Transport.

Richard Bruton

Ceist:

286 Mr. Bruton asked the Minister for Transport if he has received an application for a licence to operate a bus service to the Ballycullen area in Dublin 24 from Dublin Bus; the date on which he received this application; when he will be in a position to respond to this application; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22352/06]

Under section 24 of the Transport Act 1958, Dublin Bus is not required to hold a licence under the Road Transport Act 1932. However, since 10 January 2001, the company is required by Ministerial direction to notify my Department of proposed new services or proposed changes to existing services at least four weeks prior to their introduction.

I wish to advise the Deputy that the details of all notifications are confidential in the interest of protecting the commercial confidentiality of the applicant. However, my Department makes notifications public once decisions are made.

Departmental Staff.

Denis Naughten

Ceist:

287 Mr. Naughten asked the Minister for Transport when officials from the accounts branch of the Department of Communications, Marine and Natural Resources in Castlebar will be transferred to the Road Safety Authority in Ballina; the reason for the delay; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22359/06]

Following the recent Government decision to transfer responsibility for the Maritime Transport, Maritime Safety Directorate and the Irish Coast Guard to the Department of Transport, four staff of the accounts branch of the Department of Communications, Marine and Natural Resources in Castlebar are due to transfer to my Department and subsequently to the Road Safety Authority, once established. Three Staff are due to transfer on 3rd July 2006 and the remaining staff member will transfer once that person's current work in relation to payroll functions for Maritime Transport staff has been re-assigned to the Department.

Road Traffic Regulations.

Joe Costello

Ceist:

288 Mr. Costello asked the Minister for Transport if he will allow mourning coach hearse cars to drive in bus lanes when conveying bereaved family members to and from the church and to the graveyard; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22596/06]

The use of bus lanes is provided for in the Road Traffic (Traffic & Parking) Regulations 1997 and 1998. The primary purpose of bus lanes is to facilitate and promote bus based public transport. I do not propose to permit vehicles of funeral cortèges to use bus lanes.

Light Rail Project.

Enda Kenny

Ceist:

289 Mr. Kenny asked the Minister for Transport the plans to extend the Luas line to Rathcoole; the discussions which have taken place; the timeframe and process intended; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22676/06]

Transport 21 provides for an extension of the Tallaght Luas line to City West. The project is contingent on agreement being reached between the Railway Procurement Agency (RPA) and private developers on the sharing of the costs involved in the project. The RPA is progressing the project and South Dublin County Council have confirmed their strong support for the project.

Earlier this year I launched a public consultation process on the proposed line. My Department has recently approved an extension of the project towards the Rathcoole area, terminating at Garter Lane, subject to additional private sector involvement in funding the scheme.

I understand that the RPA hopes to submit a railway order application in respect of Line A1 later this year, subject to agreement on private sector financial support. Subject to the relevant statutory procedures construction should be completed in 2009.

Enda Kenny

Ceist:

290 Mr. Kenny asked the Minister for Transport the plans for the extension of the LUAS line in the Dublin areas; the discussions which have taken place; the timeframe and process intended; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22677/06]

Transport 21 provides for the extension of existing Luas lines and the establishment of new Luas lines in the Dublin Area within the next 10 years.

A public inquiry into the proposed Luas line from Sandyford to Cherrywood was held in March and a report on the findings of the inquiry was submitted to me in April. I am now considering this report and all relevant documentation and I will make a decision in relation to the granting of a Railway Order in due course.

A public inquiry into the proposed Luas line from Connolly Station to The Point Depot has recently been completed and I am awaiting the Inspector's report on the findings of the Inquiry.

Public consultation relating to the proposed Luas City Centre Link is underway and I am informed that the RPA intends to submit a railway order application to my Department in the early part of 2007. It is proposed that this line be extended to Liffey Junction within the timeframe of Transport 21.

Transport 21 also provides for a spur off the existing Luas Red Line, which will serve Citywest. Public consultation on this proposed spur has commenced and the RPA hopes to submit a railway order application this year subject to agreement on private sector financial support.

I understand that preliminary work has been carried out in relation to the proposed extension of the Green Luas Line to the Bray area and the RPA expects to commence public consultation in due course.

Preliminary work has also been carried out on a proposed line serving Lucan.

Telecommunications Services.

Seán Crowe

Ceist:

291 Mr. Crowe asked the Minister for Transport the meetings he has facilitated through his Department regarding the roll-out of broadband, particularly in relation to ducting infrastructure for broadband being installed on all future road and rail projects; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22704/06]

The planning, design and implementation of national road improvement projects is a matter, under the Roads Act 1993, for the National Roads Authority (NRA) and the local authorities concerned.

My Department, the NRA and the Department of Communications, Marine and Natural Resources are in ongoing discussions regarding the issue raised by the Deputy.

Taxi Regulations.

Joe Costello

Ceist:

292 Mr. Costello asked the Minister for Transport if he will allow taxi drivers use the contra-flow bus lanes as well as the ordinary bus lanes; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22705/06]

The primary purpose of bus lanes is to facilitate and promote bus based public transport.

The use of bus lanes is provided for in the Road Traffic (Traffic & Parking) Regulations 1997 and 1998. The regulations, which have national application, generally limit the use of bus lanes to buses and, in the case of with-flow bus lanes, to cyclists also.

Having regard to the role of taxis in providing an on-street immediate hire service, an exemption to the restriction relating to the use of with-flow bus lanes is allowed in respect of taxis when they are being used in the course of business.

Regulations provide that only a large public service vehicle can enter a contra-flow bus lane. This prohibition and single user status is based on road safety considerations and to give priority to the operation of large public service vehicles.

There are no plans to permit taxis to use all bus-lanes.

Driving Tests.

Fergus O'Dowd

Ceist:

293 Mr. O’Dowd asked the Minister for Transport his proposal to deal with the driving test backlog in County Louth. [22706/06]

I refer the deputy to my reply to Question No. 55 of 7 June, 2006.

As I have consistently indicated, the delay in providing driving tests is a matter of regret to me. I believe it not only represents a poor service to the public but it is also hampering the development of initiatives which I wish to pursue and which will contribute further to road safety. The driving test and those who deliver it are a key element in the road safety strategy.

It is my objective to eliminate the backlog of driving tests by mid-2007. That means having a waiting list of no more than about 50,000 that can be scheduled in a 10 to 12 week period.

The measures in place to deal with this are as follows.

Seven civil servants from the Department of Agriculture and Food commenced working as driver testers in April this year and will conduct tests in 2006 and 2007. This gives an annual additional capacity of about 10,000 tests.

Six further driver testers on 2-year contracts commenced training on 12 June, with another 5 being trained shortly thereafter. These will provide additional capacity of about 15,000 tests in a full year.

A bonus scheme for driver testers has been operating since February 2006. The testers have the potential to deliver up to 40,000 driving tests over the course of the year in the evenings and on Saturdays.

The final element in the package to eliminate the backlog of driving tests was to outsource a block of tests to an outside agency. Negotiations on this aspect reached a position on the 31 May where the Labour Relations Commission, acting as agreed mediator, recommended proposals that would enable my objective of using this option to be implemented. I have accepted the proposals and I am pleased that the driver testers have also accepted these proposals.

As envisaged by the proposals, a contract to deliver the tests is to be in place by 1st July 2006. This contract will be for the purpose of achieving a defined number of completed tests to assist in eliminating the current backlog of applications. It could be extended to 45,000 tests if necessary.

I expect to see a marked reduction in the waiting list nationwide, by the end of this year and will formally review the position, taking account of all the above measures, at that stage.

Road Safety.

Seán Crowe

Ceist:

294 Mr. Crowe asked the Minister for Transport the number of people involved in motor accidents over the past five years, per year, per county and who were driving on provisional licences. [22707/06]

I am informed by the Garda Authorities that they do not compile statistics in such a way as to identify the number of provisional licence holders involved in motor accidents.

Statistics relating to road accidents, based on information provided by the Garda Síochána, are currently published by the National Roads Authority (NRA) in their annual Road Accident Facts reports. The reports for 2000, 2001 and 2002 are known as "Road Accident Facts" and for 2003 and 2004 are entitled "Road Collision Facts". These reports are available in the Oireachtas Library and on the NRA website.

Harbours and Piers.

Michael D. Higgins

Ceist:

295 Mr. M. Higgins asked the Minister for Transport his views on submitted proposals by Galway City Council in relation to investment in Galway harbour to provide significant increased capacity and completion of the Galway docklands regeneration project. [22709/06]

Galway harbour is owned and run by Galway Harbour Company, a State-owned company established under the Harbours Act 1996. The Act provides that the principal objects of the company include the provision of such facilities, services and lands in its harbour for ships, goods and passengers, as it considers necessary.

The company is required to take all proper measures for the management, control, operation and development of its harbour. Decisions regarding any proposals for port capacity developments are primarily a matter for the port company and its board.

Galway Harbour Company has informed me that it has had preplanning discussions with Galway City Council on the company's proposal for new port facilities and I understand that an environmental impact study on this proposal is in hand.

Regional Airports.

Michael D. Higgins

Ceist:

296 Mr. M. Higgins asked the Minister for Transport his views on proposals from Galway City Council for increased runway capacity and passenger facilities at Galway airport. [22710/06]

Under the Transport 21 framework, which provides for a total public investment of €100 million in regional airport infrastructure over the next ten years, my Department will consider proposals for capital expenditure at Galway Airport, in line with the 2005 EU guidelines on public financing of airports and Department of Finance Capital Appraisal procedures.

Funding will continue to be available primarily for safety and security projects while development works will be supported where the demand for additional air services can be demonstrated and where an economic case can be made to justify increased investment.

In order to implement Transport 21, my Department has drafted a new Capital Expenditure Grant Scheme in line with the EU guidelines and I expect to be in a position to announce details shortly.

My Department has received no new proposals for financial assistance in respect of increased runway capacity or passenger facilities at Galway Airport. Any such proposals that might be submitted by the airport would be assessed under the terms of the new Capital Expenditure Grant Scheme.

Rail Services.

Michael D. Higgins

Ceist:

297 Mr. M. Higgins asked the Minister for Transport the position in relation to a commuter rail link from Galway City to Athenry and Ballinasloe, including a new rail station in Oranmore as submitted by Galway City Council. [22711/06]

Transport 21 provides for the reopening of the Western Rail Corridor on a phased basis. Iarnród Éireann has submitted a proposal to my Department for Phase 1 of the project (the reopening of the Ennis to Athenry section in 2008). This proposal provides for rail services between Limerick and Galway via Athenry, including the construction of a new station at Oranmore. These services will be additional to the services already provided between Galway City and Athlone, which service Ballinasloe and Athenry and which will be expanded to a two hourly service in 2007/2008 as additional rolling stock is provided on theroute.

The Iarnród Éireann proposals have been assessed by my Department, and I will be reporting on them to Government in the very near future.

Light Rail Project.

Michael D. Higgins

Ceist:

298 Mr. M. Higgins asked the Minister for Transport if he will release such funding to Galway City Council as would enable the carrying out of a feasibility study on the provision of light rail commuter services for Galway City. [22712/06]

Transport 21 sets out the Government's transport capital investment priorities for the ten-year period 2006 to 2015. In developing Transport 21, my Department took account of the National Spatial Strategy, Regional Planning Guidelines and a range of other sectoral and regional policy and planning documents, including the Galway Transportation and Planning Study.

Transport 21 includes a commitment to the provision of a commuter rail service to Galway via Oranmore and an improved bus service, including bus priority measures for Galway City. These improved transportation services for Galway city are to be supported by the settlement strategy including the development of the Ardaun corridor to the east of Galway city, as set out in the Galway Transportation and Planning Study agreed by Galway City and Galway County Councils. That Study does not envisage light rail measures such as those outlined in the Corrib Light Rail submission which was recently sent to my Department.

Public Transport.

Michael D. Higgins

Ceist:

299 Mr. M. Higgins asked the Minister for Transport the number of quality bus corridors which will be provided in the next 12 months in Galway City and their location. [22713/06]

My Department has funded a number of bus priority measures in Galway City in recent years. As regards future measures, Galway City Council have recently commissioned a strategic bus study regarding bus operations in Galway which will propose bus priority measures for implementation in future years. This bus study, which is being funded by my Department, is expected to be completed in the coming weeks and this will inform future proposals from the Council for funding by my Department.

Cycle Facilities.

Michael D. Higgins

Ceist:

300 Mr. M. Higgins asked the Minister for Transport the number of cycle lanes which will be provided in the next 12 months in Galway City and their location. [22714/06]

I am informed by Galway City Council that existing cycle lanes in Galway include the following:

Road

From

To

Location

Length (x2)

N6

Kirwan Roundabout

Browne Roundabout

Adjoining footpath

2,040m

Western Distributor

Deane Roundabout

Blake Roundabout

Edge of carriageway

2100 m

Parkmore

Lynch Roundabout

City Boundary

Edge of carriageway

900 m

Doughiska

Jct. Old Monivea Rd.

Access Road to NCT centre

Adjoining footpath

800 m

Hard Shoulders are provided on the N6 from the Browne Roundabout to the city limits (6500m x 2), on the N17, and on the Oranmore Coast Road.

However, following consultation by Galway City Council with the Galway Cycling Campaign different approaches are being adopted with a number of current schemes.

As part of the "Headford Road Traffic Calming Scheme", funded by the NRA, footpath widths are generally being increased to three metres. On the carriageway, where traffic islands are being installed lane widths are being increased to a minimum of four metres to accommodate on-road cyclists. Works on this scheme are due to start in the coming week and to be completed by the end of August.

Last year shared facilities by way of an inbound bus lane, funded by my Department, were provided on the Dublin Road between the Skerritt Roundabout and the Renmore Road. Subsequent to the commencement of this work, the Galway Cycling Campaign raised concerns with regard to the need to increase the width of the outbound lane and, following receipt of an application from Galway City Council, funding has been allocated by my Department for the width of the outbound lane to be increased. Design documents have been prepared and Galway City Council is currently consulting with the Galway Cycling Campaign on the proposed works. These works are expected to be completed by the end of September.

The extension of the Dublin Road bus lane back to Doughiska, funded by my Department, is due for completion in the coming weeks. Following consultation with the Galway Cycling Campaign, a 1.5 metres wide hard shoulder is being provided, between the entrance to Merlin Park and Doughiska, on the outbound side.

Recent traffic calming measures on the Siobhan McKenna Road included cycle by-passes on one-way narrowing points.

It is anticipated that the most significant development of cycle facilities in Galway in the near future will arise as a consequence of the development of bus lanes recommended by the Strategic Galway Bus Study. This study, which is being funded by my Department, is expected to be completed in the coming weeks.

Semi-State Bodies.

Olivia Mitchell

Ceist:

301 Ms O. Mitchell asked the Minister for Transport if he will guarantee that the terms of any partial sale of the State airline, Aer Lingus will be discussed and voted on by the Houses of the Oireachtas; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22716/06]

Section 3 (5) of the Aer Lingus Act 2004 provides that the general principles of the disposal of shares in Aer Lingus must be laid before and approved by the Dáil prior to any disposal. In accordance with this requirement I will move a motion setting out the general principles of the proposed initial public offering of shares in Aer Lingus in the House in the coming weeks.

Ministerial Responsibilities.

Paul McGrath

Ceist:

302 Mr. P. McGrath asked the Minister for Transport the functions which have, since the last general election, been delegated to Ministers of State at his Department by the Government under powers conferred on it by Section 2 (1) of the Ministers and Secretaries (Amendment) (No. 2) Act 1977; and the statutory instrument number of each such order. [22837/06]

The functions which have, since the last general election, been delegated to Ministers of State in my Department by the Government under powers conferred on it by Section 2 (1) of the Ministers and Secretaries (Amendment) (No. 2) Act 1977; are outlined in Statutory Instrument number 448 of 2003, Transport (Delegation of Ministerial Functions) Order 2003, to Minister of State Dr. James McDaid T.D. and S.I. No. 840, Transport (Delegation of Ministerial Functions) Order 2004 to Minister of State Mr. Ivor Callely T.D. (see following copies). I would refer the Deputy to my previous answer to Question No. 155, which sets out the responsibilities assigned to Minister of State for Transport Pat the Cope Gallagher T.D. No Delegation of Functions order has been made in respect of these responsibilities.

S.I. No. 448 of 2003.

ORDER

Entitled

Transport (Delegation of Ministerial Functions) Order 2003

The Government, on request of the Minister for Transport and in exercise of the powers conferred on them by section 2(1) of the Ministers and Secretaries (Amendment) (No. 2) Act 1977 (No. 28 of 1977), hereby order as follows:

1. This Order may be cited as the Transport (Delegation of Ministerial Functions) Order 2003.

2. In this Order—

"Act of 1961" means Road Traffic Act 1961 (No. 24 of 1961);

"Act of 1968" means Road Traffic Act 1968 (No. 28 of 1968);

"Act of 2002" means Road Traffic Act 2002 (No. 12 of 2002).

3. The powers and duties of the Minister for Transport conferred on him—

(a) by or under the provisions of the Road Traffic Acts 1961 to 2002 specified in Schedule 1 to this Order, and

(b) under the Regulations specified in Schedule 2 to this Order,

are delegated to James McDaid, Minister of State at the Department of Transport.

GIVEN under the Official Seal of the Government, 16th September, 2003.

BERTIE AHERN,

Taoiseach.

SCHEDULE 1

Provisions of Road Traffic Acts 1961 to 2002 delegated

Section 5 (insofar as it relates to a provision of the Act of 1961 delegated under this Order) of the Act of 1961,

Sections 11, 12, 13, 15 and 16 (as amended by section 6 of the Act of 1968) of the Act of 1961,

Section 61 (inserted by section 55 of the Act of 1968) of the Act of 1961,

Section 65 (as amended by section 6 of the Act of 1968) of the Act of 1961,

Sections 66, 68, 75, 78, 79, 80 and 121 of the Act of 1961,

Sections 8 to 14 and 18 (as amended by section 19 of the Act of 2002) of the Act of 1968,

Section 14 of the Act of 2002.

European Communities (Vehicle Testing) Regulations 1991 (S.I. No. 356 of 1991) (as amended by the European Communities (Vehicle Testing) (Amendment) Regulations 2002 (S.I. No. 56 of 2002) and the European Communities (Vehicle Testing) (Amendment) (No. 2) Regulations 2002 (S.I. No. 499 of 2002),

European Communities (Speed Limitation Devices) Regulations 1993 (S.I. No. 300 of 1993),

European Communities (Proof of Compliance) Regulations 2000 (S.I. No. 223 of 2000),

European Communities (Passenger Car Entry Into Service) Regulations 2001 (S.I. No. 373 of 2001),

European Communities (Mechanically Propelled Vehicle Entry Into Service) Regulations 2001 (S.I. No. 374 of 2001),

Part 9 of the Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road Regulations 2001 (No. 492 of 2001) (as amended by the Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road (Amendment) Regulations 2002 (S.I. No. 393 of 2002).

S.I. No. 840 of 2004.

ORDER

Entitled

Transport (Delegation of Ministerial Functions) Order 2004

To be made by the Government

The Government, on the request of the Minister for Transport and in exercise of the powers conferred on them by section 2(1) of the Ministers and Secretaries (Amendment) (No. 2) Act 1977 (No. 28 of 1977), hereby order as follows:

1. This Order may be cited as the Transport (Delegation of Ministerial Functions) Order 2004.

2. The powers and duties of the Minister for Transport conferred on him —

(a) by or under the enactments and the provisions of the enactments specified in Part 1,

(b) under the Regulations made under the European Communities Act 1972 (No. 27 of 1972) specified in Part 2, and

(c) under the provisions of the instruments specified in Part 3, of the Schedule to this Order are delegated to Ivor Callely, Minister of State at the Department of Transport.

SCHEDULE 1

Part 1

Enactments and provisions of enactments delegated

In this Part "Act of 1968" means the Road Traffic Act 1968 (No. 25 of 1968)

Sections 5, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16 (as amended by section 6 of the Act of 1968), 18, 60 (inserted by section 54 of the Act of 1968) 61 (inserted by section 55 of the Act of 1968) 65 (as amended by section 6 of the Act of 1968) 75, 78, 79, 80 and 121 of the Road Traffic Act 1961 (No. 24 of 1961)

Sections 8 to 14 of the Act of 1968

Section 14 of the Road Traffic Act 2002 (No. 12 of 2002)

Irish Aviation Authority Act 1993 (No. 29 of 1993)

Road Transport Act 1932 (No. 2 of 1932)

Road Transport Act 1933 (No. 8 of 1933)

Road Transport Act 1935 (No. 23 of 1935)

Transport Act 1944 (No. 21 of 1944)

Transport Act 1958 (No. 19 of 1958)

Road Transport Act 1971 (No. 8 of 1971)

Road Transport Act 1978 (No. 8 of 1978)

Road Transport Act 1986 (No. 16 of 1986)

Road Transport Act 1999 (No.15 of 1999)

Part 2

Regulations made under the European Communities Act 1972 delegated European Communities (Prohibition of Discrimination in Transport Rates and Conditions) Regulations 1975 (S.I. No. 175 of 1975)

European Communities (Vehicle Testing) Regulations 2004 (S.I. No. 771 of 2004)

European Communities (Road Passenger Transport) Regulations 1991 to 1999

European Communities (Merchandise Road Transport) Regulations 1991 to 1999

European Communities (Speed Limitation Devices) Regulations 1993 (S.I. No. 300 of 1993)

European Communities (International Carriage of Goods By Road) Regulations 1994 (S.I. No. 140 of 1994) (as amended by the European Communities (International Carriage of Goods by Road) Regulations 1994 (S.I. No. 188 of 1994))

European Communities (International Carriage of Passengers) Regulations 1999 (S.I. No. 174 of 1999)

European Communities (Proof of Compliance) Regulations 2000 (S.I. No. 223 of 2000)

European Communities (Fourth Motor Insurance Directive) Regulations 2003 (S.I. No. 651 of 2003)

European Communities (Mechanically Propelled Vehicle Entry Into Service) Regulations 2003 (S.I. No. 551 of 2003) (as amended by the European Communities (Mechanically Propelled Vehicle Entry Into Service) (Amendment) Regulations 2004 (S.I. No. 246 of 2004))

European Communities (Passenger Car Entry Into Service) Regulations 2003 (S.I. No. 552 of 2003) (as amended by the European Communities (Passenger Car Entry Into Service) (Amendment) Regulations 2004 (S.I. No. 245 of 2004))

Part 3

Provisions of other instruments delegated

Part 5 of the Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road Regulations 2004 (S.I. No. 29 of 2004) Article 3(e) (inserted by Article 3(a) of the Dublin Transportation Office (Amendment) Order 1999 (S.I. No. 337 of 1999)) of the Dublin Transportation Office (Establishment) Order 1995 (S.I. No. 289 of 1995)

GIVEN under the Official Seal of the Government, December 2004.

Community Development.

Seán Haughey

Ceist:

303 Mr. Haughey asked the Minister for Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs the allocations made to a centre (details supplied) in Dublin 5 in the past three years under the programme of grants for locally based community and voluntary organisations; the reason its current application has been refused; if he will review this decision in view of the fact that it will have to cut back its services as a result; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22292/06]

An application was received by my Department from the organisation in question under the 2005 Programme of Grants for Locally-Based Community and Voluntary Organisations.

Each application received under the Programme was assessed by Pobal on behalf of my Department by reference to the criteria set out in the published guidelines, and scored accordingly. The application from the organisation in question failed to achieve a sufficiently high score to enable it to be considered for funding on this occasion.

A request for a review of this application was received by my Department in February last. Following a comprehensive review, involving a complete reassessment of the organisation's application, the original decision was upheld.

I understand that my Department will be responding shortly to a request from the group for feedback in relation to their unsuccessful 2005 application.

The organisation previously received funding under this Programme of €6,000 in 2002, €4,000 in 2003 and €4,185 in 2004.

Security of the Elderly.

John Perry

Ceist:

304 Mr. Perry asked the Minister for Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs if persons who are over 80 and not in receipt of an old age pension are entitled to a security pendant through their local alert under the community support for older persons; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22323/06]

The Scheme of Community Support for Older People encourages and assists the community's support for older people by means of a community based grant scheme to improve the security of its older members. The scheme is administered by local community and voluntary groups with the support of my Department.

The scheme is open to people aged 65 and over who have a genuine need for assistance under this scheme.

Maximum individual grants are provided under the scheme as follows:

— €300 in respect of the once-off installation cost of socially monitored alarms

— €200 in respect of physical security equipment

— €200 in respect of security lighting

— €50 in respect of smoke alarms

— €150 in respect of interior emergency lighting for qualifying older people living on our offshore islands.

Water and Sewerage Schemes.

Jerry Cowley

Ceist:

305 Dr. Cowley asked the Minister for Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs if there is CLÁR funding available for the Achill Sound sewerage scheme, County Mayo; if, in view of the fact that the polluter pays principle means that it is making the scheme economically impossible, he will examine this situation; if he will consider meeting with the group to outline the possibilities available; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22324/06]

I have been advised that the Achill Sound Sewerage Scheme is a public scheme costing €8.55 million and that it has been approved under the Water Services Investment Programme in the Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government for commencement in 2006.

I understand that discussions are on-going between that Department and Mayo County Council with regard to addressing certain funding aspects of the project. There are currently no measures operating under the CLÁR Programme for the funding or co-funding of major public water and sewerage schemes.

Community Development.

Charlie O'Connor

Ceist:

306 Mr. O’Connor asked the Minister for Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs if his attention has been drawn to the work being done by a group (details supplied) in Dublin 24; the way in which the group might seek further resources; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22629/06]

The group detailed in the Deputy's question received funding detailed as follows through the Tallaght Local Drugs Task Force for a parent support group.

Total

November 2001 — October 2002

31,744

November 2002 — April 2003

9,524

May 2003 — October 2003

9,524

November 2003 — April 2004

9,524

May 2004 — June 2004

2,508

July 2004 — December 2004

16,825

January 2005 — December 2005

33,351

January 2006 — December 2006

34,185

Total Funding received to date

147,185

The core funding of family support groups does not come within the remit of my Department. The Deputy may wish to raise this matter with the Minister for Social and Family Affairs.

Ministerial Responsibilities.

Paul McGrath

Ceist:

307 Mr. P. McGrath asked the Minister for Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs the functions which have, since the last general election, been delegated to Ministers of State at his Department by the Government under powers conferred on it by Section 2 (1) of the Ministers and Secretaries (Amendment) (No. 2) Act 1977; and the statutory instrument number of each such order. [22838/06]

I refer the Deputy to my reply to Parliamentary Question No. 161 of 18 May 2006. The position remains unchanged.

Grant Payments.

Liam Aylward

Ceist:

308 Mr. Aylward asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food the outcome of an appeal in respect of an installation aid grant application by a person (details supplied) in County Limerick. [22277/06]

I am advised that a decision has not yet been taken by the Appeals Office on the case referred to.

Enda Kenny

Ceist:

309 Mr. Kenny asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food if, in relation to the early farm retirement scheme, she will provide figures for the number of participants in this scheme who had their pension entitlement wrongly offset; the amount of money involved; and the types of pensions or payments which have been found to have been wrongly offset. [22320/06]

It is a requirement of the EU Council Regulations under which the 1994 and 2000 Early Retirement Schemes were introduced that the Early Retirement Pension can be paid only as a supplement to any national retirement pension to which the participant, and his or her spouse or partner in a joint management arrangement, is entitled. This means that the value of any such national retirement pension payable must be deducted from the Early Retirement Pension.

It has been determined in consultation with the European Commission that the following pensions are National Retirement Pensions: Old Age Contributory pension, Old Age Non-Contributory pension, Widow/Widower's Contributory pension (at age 66), Widow/Widower's Non-Contributory pension (at age 66), Retirement pension, Invalidity pension, Blind Person's pension.

A national retirement pension is deducted on the basis of information supplied by the participant and/or by the Department of Social and Family Affairs. The type of pension to be deducted is clearly defined as above and these are the only types of pensions that have been deducted or offset from the early retirement pension.

In certain instances, a person's situation may change and their pension type or rate of pension may have altered and my Department may not have been made aware of such a change. Once my Department is notified of any such cases, where amounts have been incorrectly offset, adjustments and reimbursements, if necessary, are promptly made. It is not possible to quantify exactly the number of such cases, but it can be said that in the majority of cases the correct amount is deducted. In order to minimize these occurrences, my Department writes to each participant on an annual basis seeking confirmation that the correct amount of national retirement pension is noted on our records.

Enda Kenny

Ceist:

310 Mr. Kenny asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food her views on a proposal from ERS participants that they should receive some form of reparation payment from her Department for those who have lost access to quota as a result of decoupling; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22321/06]

There is no provision for additional payments to participants in the Early Retirement Schemes in relation to leased quotas.

However, my Department was aware, from an early stage in the negotiations leading to the introduction of the Single Payment Scheme, of the possible implications for retired farmers who had leased their holdings. In so far as it proved possible in the context of the EU Regulations governing the Single Payment Scheme, and following lengthy discussions with the European Commission, provision was made under the rules of the Single Payment Scheme to address some of the concerns of retired farmers.

As participants in the 1994 Scheme of Early Retirement from Farming had retired before the start of the reference period in 2000, they are not in a position to claim entitlements under the Single Payment Scheme. However, following agreement with the European Commission, a special category has been included in the National Reserve for farmers who inherit or otherwise receive land free of charge or for a nominal sum from a farmer who retired or died before 16 May, 2005 where the land in question was leased to a third party during the reference period. This will benefit the family members of retired farmers who decide to take up farming. Only landholders actively engaged in farming can receive entitlements from the National Reserve. A separate category (Category A) was included in the 2005 National Reserve application form to cater for this group, and similar arrangements will apply in 2006 and subsequent years.

It was open to participants in the current Early Retirement Scheme, who would have farmed during part or all of the reference period, to activate entitlements in 2005 and lease them to their existing transferee. Once that lease expires, the retired farmer has the option to lease or sell those entitlements with or without land. If the transferee did not want the entitlements, a transferor (retired farmer) who activated the entitlements in 2005 has until 2007 either to lease the entitlements or transfer them, with land, to another farmer.

Paul Connaughton

Ceist:

311 Mr. Connaughton asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food if entitlements under various national reserve headings have been credited to persons (details supplied) in County Galway; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22322/06]

The persons named submitted an application for an allocation of entitlements from the Single Payment Scheme National Reserve under Categories B and D.

Category B caters for farmers who, between 1 January 2000 and 19 October 2003, made an investment in production capacity in a farming sector for which a direct payment under Livestock Premia and/or Arable Aid schemes would have been payable during the reference period 2000- 2002. Investments can include purchase or long-term lease of land, purchase of suckler and/or ewe quota or other investments.

Category D caters for farmers who commenced farming after 31 December 2002 or who commenced farming in 2002 but who received no direct payments in respect of that scheme year.

It should be noted however that the rules governing the Single Payment Scheme stipulate that an applicant who is found to be eligible under more than one category in the Reserve may only receive an allocation of entitlements under whichever category is most beneficial to him/her.

Under Category B the persons named have applied for an allocation with regard to leased land (12.06 net hectares). The persons named also leased in 8.24 entitlements in respect of that leased-in land. The appropriate allocation due to the persons named in respect of the leased land will be made shortly and payment will follow in due course.

The persons named also qualify under Category B of the National Reserve in respect of purchase of 30 Suckler Quota rights in 2002 and the allocation due for this will issue along with the allocation due for the leased land.

My Department will write to the persons named setting out how the allocations are calculated.

Land Registry.

Willie Penrose

Ceist:

312 Mr. Penrose asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food if she will request the Irish Land Commission, to furnish original maps, which are attached to a property, which was associated with an estate (details supplied) in County Westmeath; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22349/06]

As the Land Commission allotment in this case has been registered in the Land Registry and there are now registered Land Registry folios available for the parcels of land, copies of maps used in the registration process, or a certified copy of up to date Land Registry maps must be obtained from the Land Registry Office and not my Department.

Ministerial Responsibilities.

Paul McGrath

Ceist:

313 Mr. P. McGrath asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food the functions which have, since the last general election, been delegated to Ministers of State at her Department by the Government under powers conferred on it by Section 2 (1) of the Ministers and Secretaries (Amendment) (No.2) Act 1977; and the statutory instrument number of each such order. [22839/06]

Mr. Brendan Smith T.D. Minister of State, was given delegated statutory powers and duties in relation to Food and Horticulture and additional responsibilities for the following work areas:

• Development of the Food Industry

• Monitoring of the Food Industry under the National Development Plan

• Local Slaughter Houses

• Livestock Breeding

• Horticulture/Plant Health/Organic Production/ Animal Feedstuffs

• Early Retirement Scheme.

Statutory Instrument S.I. No. 779 of 2004 setting out the powers and duties delegated to Minister Smith was signed by the Taoiseach on 23 November 2004.

Mr. John Browne T.D. Minister of State, was given delegated statutory powers and duties in relation to Forestry, Animal Health and Welfare and Customer Care and additional responsibilities for the following work areas:

• Animal Health and Welfare

• Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication Programme

• Brucellosis Eradication Programme

• Bovine Tagging and Registration

• National Beef Assurance Scheme

• Forestry.

Statutory Instrument S.I. No. 778 of 2004 setting out the powers and duties delegated to Minister Smith was signed by the Taoiseach on 23 November 2004.

The powers and duties delegated to Mr. John Browne as set out above were delegated to Ms. Mary Wallace T.D. Minister of State, in 2006. Statutory Instrument No. S.I. 299 of 2006 was signed by the Taoiseach on 30 May 2006.

Departmental Properties.

Jack Wall

Ceist:

314 Mr. Wall asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if further progress has been made in regard to acquiring a site for a group (details supplied) in County Kildare; if so, when the development will commence; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22284/06]

I can inform the Deputy that my Department is endeavouring to purchase a site, the subject of this Parliamentary Question, from Kildare County Council for some time.

I wish to confirm that funding is available from my Department for the purchase of the site and for the building of a premises to meet the needs of the Project in question. Planning permission has been obtained in accordance with the plans and specifications. Once the purchase of the site is complete, the tender process for the construction of the premises will commence.

I am advised, by our legal representatives, that the outstanding minor issues have been addressed. My Department is now in receipt of the contract of sale and I am now confident that the purchase will be finalised very shortly.

Citizenship Applications.

Liam Aylward

Ceist:

315 Mr. Aylward asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the progress to date on the application for naturalisation by a person (details supplied) in County Kilkenny. [22285/06]

An application for a certificate of naturalisation by the person referred to by the Deputy was received in the Citizenship Section of my Department on 28 February 2006.

Officials in Citizenship Section are currently processing applications for naturalisation received in the first half of 2004 and, at the present time, there are over 8,000 applications awaiting processing before that of the person in question. As things stand at present, it is likely that the application of the person in question will be finalised in the first half of 2008.

I will inform the Deputy and the person concerned when I have reached a decision on the application.

Sexual Offences.

Brian O'Shea

Ceist:

316 Mr. O’Shea asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform his proposals to set up an appropriate forum for people for people alleging that they were sexually abused as children but whose cases are not being proceeded with, due to the lapse of time, to be heard; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22286/06]

Child sexual abuse is a heinous offence which cannot be tolerated in any civilised society. As far as I, and the Government are concerned, there will be no hiding place for those who are responsible for such vile crimes. In terms of specific action, the Government established the Commission to Inquire into Child Abuse to afford victims of abuse in childhood an opportunity to tell of the abuse they suffered to a sympathetic and experienced forum and to establish as complete a picture as possible of the causes, nature and extent of physical and sexual abuse of children in institutions and in other places.

Court action may be taken under the criminal and civil code of law in relation to allegations of child sexual abuse. Statutes of limitation are not a feature of the criminal code of law, where the State, in the public interest, seeks to prosecute those who commit offences because the committing of such offences, which may result in injury to individuals, are an affront also to society at large (though the courts will prevent a prosecution from proceeding in particular cases where they are satisfied that because of the passage of time it would be unsafe to proceed). The matter is the responsibility for the Criminal Justice System which includes the Gardaí, the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) and the Courts. I have no role in relation to the investigation or prosecution of offences and this is a matter for the Gardaí and the DPP.

By contrast, the civil law provides a means whereby an individual aggrieved by the actions of another can seek redress, usually in the form of monetary compensation for the wrong alleged. The limitation period for civil actions arising out of personal injury is generally three years from the date of the injury or, if later, the date on which the victim became aware (or could have become aware) of the injury. Where the injured person was under a disability at the time of the injury or of the date of knowledge, the three-year period does not start to run until the person is no longer under a disability. "Disability" in this context is used in a technical way as meaning either a person of unsound mind or a minor. Thus for an injury done to a person as a child, the latest point at which the person can commence civil proceedings would generally be age 21: that is, three years after reaching the age of majority.

In 2000, the Statute of Limitations (Amendment) Act was passed on foot of a Private Member's Bill proposed by Deputy Jan O'Sullivan and supported by the Government. This Act made important changes to the Statute of Limitation 1957 as it relates to acts of sexual abuse done to a person while a child. As a result of that Act, a victim of child sex abuse is regarded as under a disability if, as a result of that abuse or any other act of the abuser, the person is suffering a psychological injury which substantially impairs his or her ability to make a reasoned decision in relation to bringing the civil action. Thus the three-year period does not start to run in such cases until the victim has recovered sufficiently from the psychological injury to be able to decide whether to bring the action.

The amendments made to the Statute of Limitations Acts have assisted survivors of sexual abuse in bringing court actions. The Government also put in place a regional professional counselling service, dedicated specifically to providing support and help to survivors of child abuse.

Residency Permits.

Seán Haughey

Ceist:

317 Mr. Haughey asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if he will issue an appropriate letter to persons (details supplied) in Dublin 5 confirming that permission has been granted to them to remain in the State, as confirmed to this Deputy in a reply to Parliamentary Question No. 501 of 15 November 2005, to enable them to obtain the appropriate stamp or visa; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22302/06]

I wish to inform the Deputy that letters advising the persons concerned that residency had been granted to them were issued on 11 November 2005.

Proposed Legislation.

Jim O'Keeffe

Ceist:

318 Mr. J. O’Keeffe asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the provisions he intends to include in the Civil Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill 2006 regarding, gambling, gaming or lotteries; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22303/06]

The Civil Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill 2006 amends, inter alia, the Gaming and Lotteries Acts 1956-86 to insert new values for the minimum stake and prize amounts allowed for gaming machines. Provision is also made to allow the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform to vary the amount in stake and prize money in the future.

As I indicated in the Adjournment Debate on 10th May, I propose to bring forward additional provisions aimed at tightening up the enforceability of gaming and lotteries law. These provisions are being developed for inclusion in the Bill at Committee Stage. They will reflect and reinforce current Oireachtas policy which stands for the prohibition of casino-style operations in the State and against the idea that casinos should be permitted and regulated.

Prison Committals.

Jim O'Keeffe

Ceist:

319 Mr. J. O’Keeffe asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the number of persons in prison for each of 2004, 2005 and 2006; and if he will provide a breakdown of those persons by nationality. [22304/06]

The information requested by the Deputy is set out in the following tables. It should be noted that 11% (946) of all persons who entered the prison system in 2004 were immigration detainees, the corresponding percentage for 2005 was 9% (860). 2004 A total of 8,820 persons accounted for the 10,657 committals to prison in 2004. The breakdown by nationality was as follows:

Nationality

Total

Irish

7,016

Other E.U.

215

Other European

845

Asian

217

African

374

North American

17

Central/South American

78

Austral/Asian

1

Not Recorded

57

Total

8,820

2005.

A total of 8,686 persons accounted for the 10,658 committals to prison in 2005. The breakdown by nationality was as follows:

Nationality

Total

Irish

6,501

E.U.

263

Other European

1,066

Asian

257

African

425

North American

13

Central/South American

100

Austral/Asian

6

Not Recorded

55

Total

8,686

2006 (up to 31May, 2006).

A total of 4,611 persons accounted for the 5,153 committals to prison up to and including 31 May, 2006. The breakdown by nationality was as follows:

Nationality

Total

Irish

3,383

Other E.U.

346

Other European

407

Asian

179

African

200

North American

8

Central/South American

53

Austral/Asian

1

Not Recorded

34

Total

4,611

I wish to further advise the Deputy that 946 of all persons who entered the prison system in 2004 were immigration detainees. The 2005 figure in this regard was 860 persons.

Road Traffic Offences.

Olivia Mitchell

Ceist:

320 Ms O. Mitchell asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the number of persons detected, summonsed and convicted for driving a school bus without wearing a safety belt each year from 2000 to date in 2006; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22305/06]

I am informed by the Garda authorities that the Road Traffic (Construction, Equipment and Use of Vehicles) (Amendment) (No. 3) Regulations, 1991 provide an exemption from the requirement to wear a seat belt for the drivers of vehicles which carry eight or more passengers. Consequently the question of convictions does not arise.

Garda Remuneration.

John Cregan

Ceist:

321 Mr. Cregan asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if a special pension from An Garda Síochána will be made payable to a person (details supplied) in County Cork; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22332/06]

This officer was discharged from the Garda Síochána on the grounds of ill-health on 14 November, 2004 and was awarded an ordinary ill-health pension and retirement gratuity.

Under the Garda Síochána Pension Regulations a special pension is awarded only where a member is discharged on ill-health grounds as a result of an injury received in the execution of his duties. The Garda Commissioner, on the advice of the Chief Medical Officer, deemed that the officer was not discharged as a result of an injury received in the execution of his duties. Consequently, payment of a special pension does not arise in this case.

Garda Deployment.

John Deasy

Ceist:

322 Mr. Deasy asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the number of Gardaí who have applied for transfer in Waterford City and Waterford County in each of the past five years; and the details of where they requested to be transferred from and to. [22366/06]

I have been informed by the Garda Commissioner that the personnel strength (all ranks) of An Garda Síochána rose to a record 12,641 on 8 June 2006 with the attestation of 273 new members. This compares with a total strength of 10,702 (all ranks) as at 30 June 1997 and represents an increase of 1,939 (or 18.1%) in the personnel strength of the Force during that period.

I have been further informed that the personnel strength of the Waterford/Kilkenny Division as at 9 June 2006 was 367 Gardaí (all ranks). The personnel strength of Waterford/Kilkenny Garda Division as at 31 December 1997 was 306 (all ranks). This represents a very sizeable increase of 61 (or 20%) in the number of personnel allocated to the Waterford/Kilkenny Division since that date, including an additional 13 Probationer Gardaí allocated to the Division in conjunction with the most recent allocation of Probationer Gardaí on 9 June 2006.

Garda management state that there are currently 14 Gardaí (all ranks) seeking a transfer out of the Waterford/Kilkenny Division. Where Gardaí are transferred out of a Division, replacements are provided for by way of allocation of Probationer Gardaí or inter-divisional transfers. Garda management further state that the information on total numbers of transfers sought in the past five years, and on where such members requested to be transferred to and from, is not readily available in the detail sought and can only be obtained by the disproportionate expenditure of Garda time and resources.

It is the responsibility of Garda management to allocate personnel to and within Divisions on a priority basis in accordance with the requirements of different areas. These personnel allocations are determined by a number of factors including demographics, crime trends, administrative functions and other operational policing needs. Such allocations are continually monitored and reviewed along with overall policing arrangements and operational strategy. This ensures that optimum use is made of Garda resources, and that the best possible service is provided to the public.

I should add that the current recruitment drive to increase the strength of the Garda Síochána to 14,000 members, in line with the commitment in the Agreed Programme for Government, is fully on target. This will lead to a combined strength, of both attested Gardaí and recruits in training, of 14,000 by the end of this year. The first group of newly attested Gardaí under this accelerated recruitment programme came on stream in March and the second such group did so on the 8th of June. Further tranches of approximately 275 newly attested Gardaí will follow every 90 days thereafter until the programme is complete.

The Garda Commissioner will now be drawing up plans on how best to distribute and manage these additional resources, and in this context the needs of Co. Waterford will be given the fullest consideration.

John Deasy

Ceist:

323 Mr. Deasy asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if, in view of the fact that Waterford City and County have the lowest levels of Garda Síochána of any urban area, a disproportionate amount of new recruits will be allocated to the Waterford area; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22371/06]

I have been informed by the Garda Commissioner that the personnel strength (all ranks) of An Garda Síochána rose to a record 12,641 on 8 June 2006 with the attestation of 273 new members. This compares with a total strength of 10,702 (all ranks) as at 30 June 1997 and represents an increase of 1,939 (or 18.1%) in the personnel strength of the Force during that period.

I have been further informed that the personnel strength of the Waterford/Kilkenny Division as at 9th June 2006 was 367 Gardaí (all ranks). The personnel strength of Waterford/Kilkenny Garda Division as at 31st of December 1997 was 306 (all ranks). This represents a very sizeable increase of 61 (or 20%) in the number of personnel allocated to the Waterford/Kilkenny Division since that date, including an additional 13 Probationer Gardaí allocated to the Division in conjunction with the most recent allocation of Probationer Gardaí on the 9th of June 2006.

It is the responsibility of Garda management to allocate personnel to and within Divisions on a priority basis in accordance with the requirements of different areas. These personnel allocations are determined by a number of factors including demographics, crime trends, administrative functions and other operational policing needs. Such allocations are continually monitored and reviewed along with overall policing arrangements and operational strategy. This ensures that optimum use is made of Garda resources, and that the best possible service is provided to the public.

The Garda authorities advise that the Assistant Commissioner, Human Resource Management, in consultation with Divisional Officers, arranges for the allocation of Garda personnel throughout the State. The Assistant Commissioner is aided in this regard by a model known as the Garda Establishment Redistribution Model which is a scientific, rational and pragmatic model and is the most effective means of distributing Garda personnel.

I should add that the current recruitment drive to increase the strength of the Garda Síochána to 14,000 members, in line with the commitment in the Agreed Programme for Government, is fully on target. This will lead to a combined strength, of both attested Gardaí and recruits in training, of 14,000 by the end of this year. The first group of newly attested Gardaí under this accelerated recruitment programme came on stream in March and the second such group did so on the 8th of June. Further tranches of approximately 275 newly attested Gardaí will follow every 90 days thereafter until the programme is complete.

The Garda Commissioner will now be drawing up plans on how best to distribute and manage these additional resources, and in this context the needs of the Waterford/Kilkenny Division will be given the fullest consideration.

Garda Stations.

John Deasy

Ceist:

324 Mr. Deasy asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if he will consider funding for a new Garda sub-station in the ward three area of Waterford City; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22372/06]

There are currently no plans to establish a Garda Sub-Station in the ward three area of Waterford City.

The Garda authorities point out that the opening of any new Garda station would necessitate the deployment of additional Garda personnel to indoor administrative duties. Such personnel can be utilised more effectively in providing a visible Garda presence on outdoor policing duties.

Criminal Prosecutions.

Finian McGrath

Ceist:

325 Mr. F. McGrath asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the reason the majority of sex offenders are not brought to justice; and the protection plans for child safety in place in view of the 8,150 sex offenders living and working in the community. [22414/06]

The Government places a high priority on putting into place measures aimed at tackling crimes of rape, sexual assault and other crimes of a sexual nature.

All sexual offence cases are the subject of rigorous investigation by the Gardaí. All available resources are employed in respect of all sex offence cases to bring these investigations to a successful conclusion. Investigation files are forwarded to the Law Officers for a decision as to what charges are to be preferred. An Garda Síochána actively encourages people who are the victims of any crime to report the offence to the Gardaí. In addition, a number of established initiatives underpin this policy, such as the Garda confidential telephone number, Crimestoppers and Crimecall.

The Criminal Justice (Trafficking and Sexual Offences) Bill, at present at an advanced stage of preparation in my Department, will offer further protection to children against sexual exploitation. Also, an amendment to the Criminal Justice Bill 2004 has been tabled in relation to the reckless endangerment of children. This amendment arises out of the Ferns Report which was delivered to the Minister for Health and Children last October. The amendment is due to be discussed in the near future at Committee Stage of the Criminal Justice Bill.

There is a high attrition rate in rape cases in Ireland, and a large number of cases reported to the Gardaí do not reach prosecution stage for a variety of reasons. My Department has approved joint funding for comprehensive research into attrition rates in rape cases. The research, which is entitled "the Understanding of Attrition, Early Withdrawal, the Trial Process and Identifying Possible Changes to Support Complainants in Rape Cases", is being carried out by the Department of Law at the National University of Ireland, Galway and the Rape Crisis Network Ireland, is being conducted over three years and is expected to be completed in 2007/2008. This research should provide a greater understanding as to why some victims choose not to report cases to the Gardaí, what can be done about under reporting and why, of the cases that are reported, only a relatively small percentage result in a court hearing.

The Garda Central Vetting Unit (GCVU) was established in 2002 and currently processes vetting requests in respect of, inter alia, prospective full-time employees of the Health Service Executive and certain agencies funded by the Health Service Executive, as well as in respect of selected employment in other sectors.

In 2004, an interagency Working Group on Garda vetting reported with a clear and focused strategy for enhancing national vetting arrangements. The strategy provides for an expansion of the GCVU's vetting service to all organisations which recruit persons having substantial, unsupervised access to children and vulnerable adults. The implementation of the strategy is being overseen by an Implementation Group on Garda Vetting comprising key stakeholders.

The GCVU has been successfully decentralised to new, custom-designed office accommodation in Thurles, Co. Tipperary. Since its decentralisation in November, 2005 new liaison mechanisms have been successfully implemented in the Health Service Executive and are now being extended to all organisations previously registered for vetting. Significant changes have been made in the work processes of the Unit in order to streamline the processing of vetting applications and have resulted in an improved service being provided. In addition, an additional 17 staff have been provided to the GCVU to more than double its numbers from 13 to 30.

The expansion of the Garda Vetting service to new organisations and sectors will be by way of a phased roll-out to an increasing number of organisations in the child care and vulnerable adult care sector and a phased expansion plan, within current resource capacity, has been prepared and accepted by the Implementation Group on Garda Vetting. This has resulted in an increase in the number of Health Service Executive personnel being vetted in the first quarter in 2006, as well as vetting being introduced for the Private Security Authority. A number of organisations from the voluntary sector are currently being identified for vetting services.

The expansion of the service being provided by the GCVU is proceeding in a planned and structured manner in consultation with Government Departments responsible for childcare, and will continue until vetting is provided for all personnel working in a full time, part-time and or voluntary capacity with children and or vulnerable adults.

The Sex Offenders Act, 2001, which commenced on 27 September 2001, sets out the obligations on persons convicted of a range of sexual offences. A convicted sex offender must notify his/her name(s), date of birth and current home address to the Garda Síochána within seven days of the conviction for the sexual offence concerned or, where the offender is sentenced to imprisonment, from the date of full release from prison.

Thereafter, the offender must notify the Gardaí of any change of name or address within seven days of that change. Notification of any address where the offender spends either as much as seven days or two or more periods amounting to seven days in any twelve month period must also be given to the Gardaí.

If the offender intends to leave the State for a period of seven days or more s/he must inform the Gardaí of this fact and the address at which s/he intends to stay and also notify the Gardaí of his/her return. If s/he did not intend to stay away for more than seven days but did, s/he must inform the Gardaí within a further seven days.

The provisions of the Act extend to any sex offenders entering this jurisdiction from abroad who have an obligation to register in their own countries.

It is an offence to fail to comply with the notification requirements. The penalty is imprisonment for up to 12 months or a fine of €1,900 or both.

The courts can also sentence an offender who has been found guilty of an offence under the schedule of offences in the Act to a period of statutory supervision under the Probation and Welfare Service on their release from prison.

The Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault Unit of An Garda Síochána monitor and manage the notification provisions. There are nominated Garda Inspectors in each Garda Division who are notified by the Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault Unit when a sex offender, who is subject to the requirements of the Sex Offenders Act, 2001, becomes resident in their Division and who have responsibility for monitoring such persons.

There are currently 915 persons subject to the Act's requirements. The Act and its operation are kept under constant review.

Ministerial Responsibilities.

Finian McGrath

Ceist:

326 Mr. F. McGrath asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the person responsible for the overall supervision and management of the justice system here; and the person who takes responsibility when it fails citizens. [22415/06]

The Irish criminal justice system has served the people well since the foundation of the State. In particular, our criminal justice system has acted down the years as a vital bulwark, protecting our citizens from the very real threat posed to the State from subversion and terrorism.

Political accountability for the criminal justice system is vested in the Minister for Justice. As the current holder of this post I can assure the Deputy that I will continue to implement the Government's ambitious modernising and reforming programme right across the system, from policing to management of prisoners.

Other office holders, judicial and non-judicial, share in responsibility to ensure the efficient management and operation of the criminal justice system and all are bound under the Constitution to do their utmost to ensure it serves the people to the highest possible standards.

Prison Therapeutic Services.

Finian McGrath

Ceist:

327 Mr. F. McGrath asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the reason the number of sex offence prisoners receiving therapy has decreased; and the reason he closed the major unit at the Curragh. [22417/06]

There are three forms of direct therapeutic intervention for sex offenders currently operating within the Irish prison system. These are as follows: individual counselling from the Irish Prison Service's Psychology Service and from the Probation and Welfare Service; the Sex Offender Programme which has been in operation since 1994; and one-to-one interventions by visiting psychiatrists who provide support to prisoners.

Every effort is made to assist sex offenders in custody who are willing to participate at any level in their personal rehabilitation and relapse prevention. While it is not possible to quantify with absolute accuracy participation in all forms of rehabilitation, many of those in custody for sex offences have availed of one or more of the forms of intervention referred to above.

A total of 122 sex offenders have completed the Sex Offender Programme to date. This figure includes eight men who have recently completed the programme in Arbour Hill Prison. It is envisaged that another programme will commence in Arbour Hill Prison in Autumn 2006.

The number of suitably motivated offenders applying for participation on the Sex Offenders Programme has, however, declined in recent years and this is a matter of concern. The Irish Prison Service are currently examining this situation to determine what measures may be taken to increase the number of offenders participating on the programme. A number of additional psychologists have recently been appointed to the Irish Prison Service. These new psychologists will play an important role in working with offenders to address their offending behaviour, including work with sex offenders aimed at enhancing their preparedness for possible participation on the Sex Offender Programme.

As I have indicated to this House on a number of previous occasions, the permanent closure of The Curragh Place of Detention arose in the context of the implementation of the change agenda aimed at eliminating overtime payments and reducing other costs in the Irish Prison Service.

Garda Equipment.

Marian Harkin

Ceist:

328 Ms Harkin asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if he will clarify his reply to Parliamentary Question No. 385 of 16 May 2006, if Garda stations have fax machines and do not use them or if they do not have fax machines at all. [22421/06]

I presume that the Deputy is in fact referring to my reply to Parliamentary Question no. 531 of 30 May 2006. In response I can confirm that 21 Garda stations in the Sligo/Leitrim Division do not have fax machines.

Residency Permits.

Brian O'Shea

Ceist:

329 Mr. O’Shea asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the position regarding residency for persons (details supplied) in County Waterford; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22431/06]

The parents of the persons in question were granted permission to remain in the State in accordance with the revised arrangements for parents of an Irish child born before 1 January 2005, commonly referred to as the IBC/05 scheme.

The persons concerned have applied for permission to remain in the State on the basis that they are dependents of people granted residency under the IBC/05 scheme. It is currently taking approximately 12 months to process such applications due to the volume of cases on hands following the cessation of the above mentioned scheme.

Drugs in Prisons.

Aengus Ó Snodaigh

Ceist:

330 Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the way in which the Government will know whether it has been successful in making the prisons drug free when his office admits that it is difficult to quantify the precise level of illegal drugs consumed by prisoners or the numbers of prisoners actually abusing drugs, in view of the covert nature of illicit drug taking while in a custodial setting. [22435/06]

As I have repeatedly stated, no level of illegal drug consumption in a prison setting is acceptable to me or to the prison authorities. It is my intention and that of the Irish Prison Service to take all necessary measures to eliminate drug misuse among prisoners. There are currently a range of measures employed in the Irish Prison Service with the aim of eliminating both the supply of and the demand for drugs within the prison system. These measures continue to be updated and reinforced and the new Drugs Policy and Strategy for the Prison Service, again outlines my personal commitment to tackling this problem.

The absence to date of mandatory drug testing has made it impossible to accurately quantify the measure of drug misuse within our prison system. This new initiative will, for the first time, provide empirical evidence as to the extent of the problem and also provide information on trends in drug misuse. In addition, it will enable the identification and referral of drug abusers to treatment programmes, enable enhanced focusing of resources and act as a deterrent to drug misuse.

Measures to curtail the supply of drugs into prisons, include video surveillance, improved visiting/searching facilities and increased vigilance by staff. Netting has been installed over the recreation yards in a number of our closed prisons, to prevent contraband material, such as drugs, being propelled over exterior walls. Future prison designs will seek to locate recreation yards away from perimeter walls as part of further efforts to frustrate the supply of illegal drugs.

Measures to reduce the demand for drugs within the prison system include education, treatment and rehabilitation of drug addicted offenders. These programmes and interventions are delivered on an individual and coordinated basis by the Psychology Service, Probation and Welfare Service, Prison Education Service and prison officers. Particular initiatives put in place include Drug Free Areas, Drug Misuse Awareness Programmes, Support Programmes and appropriate health interventions, Substitution Therapies, Vaccination Programmes and treatment for viral illnesses.

Aengus Ó Snodaigh

Ceist:

331 Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if he will explain what the Irish Prison Service has learned from the Scottish Prison Service’s decision to end mandatory drug testing after ten years due to the fact that it was not achieving the desired results in view of his office indicating that the Irish Prison Service are always conscious of the potential to learn from improvements in other countries with regard to drug treatment, particularly with regard to technological developments. [22436/06]

The new Irish Prison Service Policy and Strategy, entitled Keeping Drugs out of Prisons fulfils the commitment in the Programme for Government to publish a plan to end all heroin use in Irish prisons as well as my own commitment to achieving a drug-free prison system. The new Policy and Strategy provides, for the first time, a coordinated and consistent national approach to eliminating the supply of drugs into prison as well as ensuring that appropriate treatment is available to prisoners to help them conquer their addiction.

The implementation of the new Policy and Strategy will see an intensification of efforts in the prison system to eliminate the availability of illicit drugs within prisons. This will involve the traditional means of effecting supply reduction — staff vigilance, physical searches and supervision of persons entering prisons — continuing to be reinforced by means of improved facilities and procedures. The Policy and Strategy also provides for a range of new measures to eliminate the supply of drugs into prisons, including enhanced visit security, the introduction of drug detection dogs and mandatory drug testing.

My Department is always cognisant of improvements in other countries with regard to drug treatment, particularly with regard to technological developments. To this end, the Irish Prison Service remains in regular contact with other jurisdictions, including the Scottish Prison Service, and it is my understanding the practice of mandatory drug testing has not been discontinued in that Prison Service. Mandatory drug testing is still conducted on a quarterly basis in order to aid management of the prison population. Prisoners, in order to progress through the system to a more enhanced regime setting, must undertake a Mandatory Drug Test.

I am satisfied that mandatory drug testing can play an important role in the overall strategy for tackling the scourge of drug use among prisoners in Irish prisons. Mandatory drug testing will provide information on trends in drug misuse, enable the identification and referral of drug abusers to treatment programmes, enable enhanced focusing of resources and act as a deterrent to drug misuse. Mandatory drug testing will also provide important information to prison management that will contribute significantly to decision-making in relation to the management of individual prisoners sentences. The introduction of mandatory drug testing will allow the Irish Prison Service to deploy its resources in the most rational and productive manner.

Jim O'Keeffe

Ceist:

332 Mr. J. O’Keeffe asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if the guidelines in relation to mandatory drug testing in prisons have been drawn up; and if he will outline same. [22464/06]

I can advise the Deputy that the Irish Prison Service is currently drafting a document which will provide detailed instruction and guidance on the implementation of Mandatory Drug Testing.

EU Directives.

Damien English

Ceist:

333 Mr. English asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the reason the regulations as enacted here only apply to family members lawfully resident in another Member State in relation to the enactment of the European Communities (Free Movement of Persons) Regulations 2006, in view of the fact that the regulations as adopted by the European Council do not include this limitation. [22649/06]

On 28 April, 2006 I made the European Communities (Free Movement of Persons) Regulations 2006 which transposed into Irish law the European Directive on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States. The Directive replaced nine previous Directives and amended one European Regulation, No. 1612/68, on the freedom of workers within the Community.

The provision in the Regulations as referred to by the Deputy takes account of rulings from the European Court of Justice, in particular in the "Akrich" case (C-109/01), which dealt with the freedom of movement of workers within the European Union. In that case the Court ruled, inter alia, that in order to be able to benefit from the rights provided for in Article 10 of Regulation (EEC) No. 1612/68 on freedom of workers within the Community, a national of a non-Member State married to a citizen of the Union must be lawfully resident in a Member State when he/she moves to another Member State to which the Union citizen is migrating or has migrated.

Residency Permits.

Barry Andrews

Ceist:

334 Mr. Andrews asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the reason a fee of €100 is being levied for Garda national immigration bureau cards in view of the fact that previously these cards were issued free of charge and in view of the fact that passports cost €75. [22679/06]

In line with international practice I introduced a fee for immigration registration certificates with effect from May 27 2006. The introduction of such a fee had been flagged both in the Immigration Act 2004, and in the discussion document containing the outline policy proposals for an Immigration, Residence and Protection Bill.

Non-EEA nationals who register with an immigration registration officer receive a secure residence document in the form of a Certificate of Registration (registration card). The provision of such high quality secure documents is an expensive process. The costs involved include the actual cost of the card itself which includes several security features (including a biometric chip), administrative work by registration officers in the form of checking of documentation and capture of registration details and a state-of-the-art computerised registration system operated by the Garda National Immigration Bureau (GNIB).

The State must provide the administrative resources and computer systems necessary to deal with the issuing of these residence documents and the practice internationally is to charge for the issuing of residence permits. Ireland has now introduced a similar charging system and the fee of €100 is in line with the amounts charged in other states.

I would also like to take this opportunity to point out that the Regulations which I have introduced provide for exemptions from payment of the fee. There are six categories of persons who are exempt from payment of the fee and these categories are as follows: Persons in respect of whom a declaration of refugee status under section 17 of the Refugee Act 1996 is in force (Convention Refugees); Persons who have been reunified with such refugees under section 18 of the Refugee Act 1996; Programme refugees within the meaning of section 24 of the Refugee Act 1996; Persons who are under 18 years of age at the time of registration; Spouses of Irish citizens; Dependants of EU nationals who receive a residence permit under EU Directive 38/04.

The vast majority of the remaining categories of non-EEA nationals registered in Ireland will be resident on the basis that they are working, studying or self-sufficient. Such persons have been granted residency on the basis that they would be able to support themselves and would not be a burden on the State's resources. For such a person who has indicated that he/she has sufficient funds to reside in Ireland without becoming a burden on the State, the payment of €100, typically once a year, should not be too onerous considering that it works out as costing less than €2 per week.

It should also be noted that not all applicants will have to pay the fee on a yearly basis. Each individual will be charged for the issue of the registration certificate regardless of the certificate's duration, so in effect if a person is entitled to be registered for more than one year, he/she will still only have to pay a fee of €100 for this certificate.

In relation to the Deputy's point regarding the cost of passports, I would like to clarify that the issuance and cost of Irish passports is a matter which falls under the remit of the Department of Foreign Affairs and not that of the Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform.

Garda Investigations.

Joe Costello

Ceist:

335 Mr. Costello asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the steps which have been taken to verify the accuracy of the allegations in correspondence (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22688/06]

I have requested a report from the Garda authorities in relation to the allegations in question. I will contact the Deputy again when the report is to hand.

Joe Costello

Ceist:

336 Mr. Costello asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if he will meet with persons (details supplied). [22698/06]

I am aware from a considerable volume of correspondence that both families wish to meet with me to demand separate independent inquiries into the tragic deaths of their sons — deaths which were unrelated save for the fact that both occurred following detention in Garda custody.

With regard to the first family I have read the Garda investigation file in the matter and the Director of Public Prosecutions has directed no prosecution on foot of that investigation file. At present, the inquest into the death is ongoing. I have informed the family that further consideration will be given to their request for a meeting when the inquest has been completed and a verdict returned.

The circumstances of the first case are quite different from those of the second case. In the first case, unlike the second case, all are agreed that the young man in question suffered serious injuries in a Garda Station.

As a consequence my position in relation to the second case remains unaltered from that outlined by me in my response to Parliamentary Question Number 409 of 6 July 2004. Thus I would be unable to bring the matter further at any proposed meeting.

Garda Operations.

Joe Costello

Ceist:

337 Mr. Costello asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform when the Garda unit for vetting people who apply to work with young people was established; the number of people in the unit; the areas of employment vetted by the unit; the average waiting time for vetting to take place; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22699/06]

The Garda Central Vetting Unit (GCVU) was established in January 2002 to deal with the then known demand for vetting applications. From a child protection perspective, the Unit processes vetting requests in respect of the following:

—prospective employees of the Health Service Executive (HSE);

—prospective employees of certain agencies funded by the HSE;

—childcare places funded by the Equal Opportunities Childcare Programme of the Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform;

—special education facilities;

—special needs assistants in the general education sector;

—school transports; and

—prospective adoptive parents and fosterers.

The GCVU is currently staffed by 34 personnel, comprising 1 Garda Inspector, 2 Garda Sergeants and 31 civil servants. This level of staffing represents a more than doubling in the human resources allocated to the Unit in the past 12 months.

The current average processing time for vetting applications is approximately five weeks.

Since the GCVU's decentralisation to Thurles, Co. Tipperary, in November 2005, new liaison mechanisms have been successfully implemented in the HSE and are now being extended to all organisations previously registered for vetting. Significant changes have been made in the work processes of the Unit in order to streamline the processing of vetting applications, and these have resulted in an improved service being provided.

A planned expansion of the Garda vetting service to new organisations and sectors will occur by means of a phased roll-out to an increasing number of organisations in the child and vulnerable adult care sectors. To this end, a phased expansion plan, within current resource capacities, has been prepared. This has resulted in an increase in the number of HSE personnel being vetted in the first quarter in 2006, as well as vetting being introduced for the Private Security Authority. A number of organisations from the voluntary sector are currently being identified for vetting services.

The expansion of the vetting service being provided by the GCVU is proceeding in a planned and structured manner in consultation with the Government Departments responsible for child and vulnerable adult care. This expansion will continue until vetting is provided for all personnel working in a full time, part-time and/or voluntary capacity with children and/or vulnerable adults.

Garda Training.

Olivia Mitchell

Ceist:

338 Ms O. Mitchell asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the number of Gardaí driving on provisional or full licences; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22717/06]

I am informed by the Garda authorities that members of the Garda Síochána are allowed to drive official vehicles in two circumstances: (a) they hold at least a class "B" Driving licence and have been authorised to drive by the Chief Superintendent or (b) they have completed an official driving course.

Members on provisional licences are not permitted to drive official vehicles.

Divisional Officers or Chief Superintendents have the power to authorise a member who is a holder of a full class "B" Driving licence (standard car licence) to drive official cars and vans, subject to the member being otherwise deemed suitable. This applies only to a car or van. This is known as "Chief's Permission".

Members who have been issued with a Certificate of Competency — having completed an appropriate driving course — may also be authorised by Divisional Officers or Chief Superintendents to drive official vehicles. The Certificate of Competency allows a member to drive official vehicles where he/she has completed a course for that particular vehicle.

The fact that members who hold a current Class B Driving licence may with Chief's Permission drive official cars is of assistance to Garda management from an operational point of view.

I have been further informed by the Garda authorities that the number of Gardaí who are driving Garda cars generally and have Chief Superintendent's permission, in each region, as at 7 February, 2006 (the latest date for which figures are readily available) was as set out in the following table.

Region

Number

D.M.R

836

South Eastern

201

Eastern

226

Northern

252

Western

132

Southern

366

Total

2,013

Proposed Legislation.

Bernard J. Durkan

Ceist:

339 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if he has received correspondence from an association (details supplied) in relation to the Gaming and Lotteries Act 1979; his plans in this regard; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22731/06]

As already indicated in my answer to Parliamentary Questions Nos. 491 and 494 on 30 May 2006, in discussions held with my officials at the request of a body called the Gaming and Leisure Association of Ireland, representing a number of casino-style operations, the following views and proposals were conveyed in clear terms to that Association.

Public policy in the matter of casino gambling in Ireland is as set out in the Gaming and Lotteries Acts. These Acts prohibit casino-type operations, and I am strongly of the view that there should be no departure from settled policy in this area.

It is my view that casinos are socially undesirable and I think that is the view of a great many people in this society. The Gaming and Lotteries Acts 1956-1986 define what unlawful gaming is, and allow permitted exclusions from that definition which cater for many activities that currently take place.

As I already indicated in an earlier Parliamentary Question (No. 409 on 4 April 2006) I have concerns about the enforceability of the present law as it applies to casino-style operations and the scope for use of such operations for money-laundering. There has been concern for some time about the scope that casinos offer for money laundering and the concealment of the proceeds of crime. This was highlighted in a recent report of an evaluation by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) — the leading international anti-money laundering organisation — of Ireland's anti-money laundering legislation and other measures. In that Report, the FATF evaluation team expressed their concern and stated that" . . . this system [of private clubs operating as casinos] does create the potential for real AML/CFT (Money Laundering/Financing of Terrorism) risks". I also indicated in that reply that I intended to bring forward proposals for further changes to the gaming and lotteries legislation that will facilitate the prosecution of offences and the closing down of establishments engaged in such illegal operations. It is my intention to seek Government approval within the next few weeks for these changes, to be included, by way of Committee Stage amendments to the Civil Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill 2006.

Since meeting with my officials, the Association has made a written submission which is now being examined in the Department.

Citizenship Applications.

Jim O'Keeffe

Ceist:

340 Mr. J. O’Keeffe asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform if he will complete the application for naturalisation of a person (details supplied) whose family was granted naturalisation in 1993. [22803/06]

I am pleased to inform the Deputy that I have recently approved the application for naturalisation of the person in question. A letter is due to issue to him in the next few days informing him of my decision and the procedures that need to be finalised before a certificate of naturalisation can issue.

Ministerial Responsibilities.

Paul McGrath

Ceist:

341 Mr. P. McGrath asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the functions which have, since the last general election, been delegated to Ministers of State at his Department by the Government under powers conferred on it by Section 2 (1) of the Ministers and Secretaries (Amendment) (No.2) Act 1977; and the statutory instrument number of each such order. [22840/06]

There are two Ministers of State attached to my Department. Minister of State Frank Fahey, T.D. was appointed by the Government on 29 September, 2004 with responsibility for equality matters, particularly disability. There is no Statutory Instrument in this regard.

Powers and duties were delegated to Mr. Brian Lenihan, T.D. under S.I. Number 474 of 2002. However, as the Deputy is aware, a New National Childcare Investment Programme 2006-2010 was announced by the Minister for Finance, Mr. Brian Cowen, T.D. on 7 December last, in Budget 2006. Also announced was a landmark decision to create an Office of the Minister for Children, under the Minister for Children, Mr Brian Lenihan, T.D. who will report directly to Cabinet on matters relating to children and their welfare. The New Programme is a key element of the National Childcare Strategy 2006 — 2010 to be implemented by the new Office of the Minister for Children. It is effective from 1 January, 2006 and succeeds the Equal Opportunities Childcare Programme (EOCP) 2000-2006 which was run by my Department. The Youth Justice Service of the Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform is also co-located at the new Office.

Garda Deployment.

David Stanton

Ceist:

342 Mr. Stanton asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the number of Gardaí stationed in the Fermoy district for each of the years 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22865/06]

David Stanton

Ceist:

343 Mr. Stanton asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the number of Gardaí stationed in the Mitchelstown, Kildorrery and Kilworth Garda stations in the Fermoy district for each of the years 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22866/06]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 342 and 343 together.

I have been informed by the Garda Commissioner that the personnel strength (all ranks) of An Garda Síochána rose to a record 12,641 on 8 June 2006 with the attestation of 273 new members. This compares with a total strength of 10,702 (all ranks) as at 30 June 1997 and represents an increase of 1,939 (or 18.1%) in the personnel strength of the Force during that period.

I have been further informed that the personnel strength of the Fermoy District as at 31 December 2002, 2003, 2004 2005 and 30 April 2006 was as follows:

Year

Total

2002

71

2003

73

2004

69

2005

71

30/4/2006

72

The personnel strength of the Mitchelstown, Kildorrey and Kilworth Garda Stations as at the 31st December 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005 was as follows:

Station

2002

2003

2004

2005

Mitchelstown

18

18

15

17

Kildorrey

2

1

1

1

Kilworth

1

1

1

1

I am also advised that in conjunction with the most recent allocation of Probationer Gardaí on 9 June 2006 a total of 12 Gardaí are to be assigned to the Cork North Division — nine (9) Probationer Gardaí by way of first allocation on attestation, and a further three (3) Gardaí by way of permanent inter-Divisional transfer. The full allocation of 12 members is due to take place by 11 July 2006. I am further advised that four (4) of these 12 Gardaí are due to be assigned to the Fermoy District.

It is the responsibility of Garda management to allocate personnel to and within Divisions on a priority basis in accordance with the requirements of different areas. These personnel allocations are determined by a number of factors including demographics, crime trends, administrative functions and other operational policing needs. Such allocations are continually monitored and reviewed along with overall policing arrangements and operational strategy. This ensures that optimum use is made of Garda resources, and that the best possible service is provided to the public.

I should add that the current recruitment drive to increase the strength of the Garda Síochána to 14,000 members, in line with the commitment in the Agreed Programme for Government, is fully on target. This will lead to a combined strength, of both attested Gardaí and recruits in training, of 14,000 by the end of this year. The second group of newly attested Gardaí under this accelerated recruitment programme came on stream in June and further tranches of approximately 275 newly attested Gardaí will follow every 90 days thereafter until the programme is complete.

Garda Investigations.

David Stanton

Ceist:

344 Mr. Stanton asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the number of group six headline offences recorded in the Fermoy district for each of the years 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22867/06]

David Stanton

Ceist:

345 Mr. Stanton asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the number of group seven headline offences recorded in the Fermoy district for each of the years 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22868/06]

David Stanton

Ceist:

346 Mr. Stanton asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the number of group eight headline offences recorded in the Fermoy district for each of the years 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22869/06]

David Stanton

Ceist:

347 Mr. Stanton asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the number of group 15 non-headline offences recorded in the Fermoy district for each of the years 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22871/06]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 344 to 347, inclusive, together.

Headline crime statistics for 2002 to 2005 for the Garda Division of North Cork, which includes the Garda District of Fermoy, are contained in the relevant Garda Annual Reports which are available in the Oireachtas Library.

Special Educational Needs.

Jerry Cowley

Ceist:

348 Dr. Cowley asked the Minister for Education and Science the amount the Government is spending on defending cases brought by relatives of autistic people on account of the Governments failure to provide adequate services for people with autism; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22467/06]

To date in 2006 my Department has spent a total of approximately €100,000 on legal costs and settlements associated with court cases relating to educational provision for children with special needs compared to a total of approximately €1.6 million in 2005, €5.7 million in 2004 and €4.4 million in 2003. The vast majority of the cases in question relate to children with autism. The Department of Education and Science is not complacent in dealing with these cases and it attempts, wherever possible, to reduce the potential for litigation and the levels of legal costs where litigation arises.

It is the case however that legal costs associated with such cases may take some time to be submitted and processed and it is possible that further costs will be incurred before the end of the year. I would add that these figures do not include the costs of the State's Legal defence which is borne by the Attorney General's office.

I wish to assure the Deputy that I am most anxious that all children, including children with autistic spectrum disorders, receive an education appropriate to their needs. It is in recognition of this that my Department currently provides the following facilities for the education of children with autism: 159 Special Classes for children with autism, attached to special and mainstream schools; 15 pre-school classes; 5 Special classes for children with Asperger's Syndrome; 12 Stand-Alone facilities providing an Applied Behavioural Analysis (ABA) specific methodology.

I can confirm that I will continue to prioritise the issue of special needs education and, in co-operation with the National Council for Special Education and the education partners, ensure that all children with special educational needs are adequately resourced to enable them to meet their full potential.

Home Tuition.

Liam Aylward

Ceist:

349 Mr. Aylward asked the Minister for Education and Science if she will make arrangements to pay home tuition allowance to a person (details supplied) in County Carlow. [22278/06]

I can confirm for the Deputy that my Department sanctioned a home tuition grant for the child in question for January and February 2006. I understand that the child subsequently returned to school so the grant was discontinued. The child has since been asked to leave the school and the home tuition grant has been restored with effect from 23rd May 2006. The matter referred to by the Deputy will be examined by my officials and a decision will be conveyed to the parents as quickly as possible.

Schools Building Projects.

Joe Walsh

Ceist:

350 Mr. Walsh asked the Minister for Education and Science if she will approve an extension to a school (details supplied) in County Cork. [22279/06]

An application for capital funding towards the provision of an extension has been received from the school referred to by the Deputy. Officials in my Department are carrying out an examination of all the relevant factors such as current and projected enrolment, demographic trends and the likely impact of ongoing and proposed housing developments in the area with a view to determining the long term accommodation needs of the school. When this has been finalised, the application will be considered for progression in the context of the School Building and Modernisation Programme 2006 — 2010.

Schools Recognition.

Jan O'Sullivan

Ceist:

351 Ms O’Sullivan asked the Minister for Education and Science the reason her Department has deferred the granting of national school status to a school (details supplied) in County Wicklow; if she will review that decision in view of the shortage of places and lack of choice of type of school patronage in that area; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22293/06]

I am pleased to inform the Deputy that the school referred to has been granted recognition from September 2006, in accordance with the provisions of Section 10 of the Education Act, 1998 and the published criteria for recognition of new schools.

State Examinations.

Jan O'Sullivan

Ceist:

352 Ms O’Sullivan asked the Minister for Education and Science the number of students repeating the leaving certificate on a county basis in respect of the years 2004 and 2005; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22294/06]

The following are the total number of pupils repeating the leaving certificate in each county for the 2004/05 and the 2005/06 school years.

Total Number of Repeat Leaving Certificate Students for 2004/05 school year

County Name

2004/05 figures

Carlow

113

Cavan

32

Clare

160

Cork County

149

Cork County Borough

175

Donegal

220

Dublin County Borough

327

Dublin Fingal

16

Dublin South

236

Dún Laoghaire/Rathdown

92

Galway County

153

Galway County Borough

46

Kerry

242

Kildare

60

Kilkenny

27

Laoighis

33

Leitrim

40

Limerick County

56

Limerick County Borough

38

Longford

69

Louth

79

Mayo

196

Meath

79

Monaghan

37

Offaly

113

Roscommon

54

Sligo

101

Tipperary N.R.

81

Tipperary S.R.

90

Waterford County

23

Waterford County Borough

72

Westmeath

250

Wexford

88

Wicklow

39

Total

3,586

Total Number of Repeat Leaving Certificate students for 2005/06 school year

County Name

2005/06 figures

Carlow

114

Cavan

25

Clare

161

Cork County

100

Cork County Borough

126

Donegal

174

Dublin County Borough

280

Dublin Fingal

22

Dublin South

178

Dún Laoghaire/Rathdown

118

Galway County

115

Galway County Borough

51

Kerry

165

Kildare

70

Kilkenny

35

Laoighis

20

Leitrim

40

Limerick County

51

Limerick County Borough

27

Longford

50

Louth

83

Mayo

208

Meath

81

Monaghan

34

Offaly

93

Roscommon

31

Sligo

56

Tipperary N.R.

56

Tipperary S.R.

66

Waterford County

18

Waterford County Borough

57

Westmeath

207

Wexford

70

Wicklow

34

Total

3,016

Home Tuition.

Pat Breen

Ceist:

353 Mr. P. Breen asked the Minister for Education and Science further to Parliamentary Question Nos. 498 of 16 May 2006 and 214 of 1 June 2006, when her Department will be in touch with a person (details supplied) in County Clare; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22325/06]

My Department wrote to this pupil's parents confirming its intention to discontinue the practice of sanctioning home tuition grants for pupils who are also in full-time education. In this particular case, the home tuition grant was sanctioned until 28th April 2006. My officials will be in further contact with the family in the coming days.

Special Educational Needs.

Paul McGrath

Ceist:

354 Mr. P. McGrath asked the Minister for Education and Science the individual special schools and schools with special classes which applied for the July Education Programme in each of the past four years; the cost of operating this programme per school for the month of July in each of the past four years; the number of pupils per school and class who benefited from this scheme; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22347/06]

Paul McGrath

Ceist:

355 Mr. P. McGrath asked the Minister for Education and Science the number of special needs students who were facilitated with home tuition as part of the July Education Programme in each of the past four years; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22348/06]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 354 and 355 together. My Department's support package for the July Education Programme is available to all special schools and mainstream primary schools with special classes catering for children with autism who choose to extend their education services through the month of July. My Department also provides for a July Programme for pupils with a severe/profound general learning disability. My Department encourages all eligible schools to participate in this initiative in the interest of the children in question. Where school based provision is not feasible, home based provision may be grant aided.

The cost of the package includes agreed rates of remuneration for principals, teachers and special needs assistants involved in the July Programme. Participating schools also receive a special rate of capitation funding in respect of pupils participating in the programme. Funding is also available to facilitate the provision of school transport and escort services for the children.

My Department has seen a steady increase in the number of schools offering the July Programme which is detailed below.

Year

Total No. schools/classes

Total No. pupils home based provision

2002

38

116

2003

53

307

2004

59

633

2005

64

933

Pupil-Teacher Ratio.

Joan Burton

Ceist:

356 Ms Burton asked the Minister for Education and Science the average class size at a school (details supplied) in Dublin 15; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22378/06]

The average class size in the school referred to by the Deputy for the 2005/06 school year is 29.4. Major improvements have been made in primary school staffing in recent years. Next September there will no less than 4000 extra teachers in our primary schools, compared with 2002. Not only is the average class size in our primary schools down to 24, but there is now one teacher for 17 pupils at primary level, including resource teachers etc.

Children with special needs and those from disadvantaged areas are getting more support than ever before to help them to make the most of their time at school. With the thousands of extra primary teachers appointed, recent years have seen the largest expansion in teacher numbers since the expansion of free education. Over the next two school years even more teachers will be put in place both for the above priority areas of disadvantage and special education and also under a reduction in the mainstream staffing schedule at primary level.

Primary schools are staffed on a general rule of at least one classroom teacher for every 29 children. Of course, schools with only one or two teachers have much lower staffing ratios than that — with two teachers for just 12 pupils in some cases and so on — but the general rule is that there is at least one classroom teacher for every 29 children in the school. Next year this is being reduced to 28 children per classroom teacher and in 2007/2008 it will be reduced to 27 children per classroom teacher.

The number of children in large classes has been reduced dramatically by this Government. Furthermore, what really puts the decrease in large classes in context is the fact that in 1996/97 five times more children were in classes of 35+ and ten times more children were in classes of 40+.

It is important to appreciate that there are a number of different reasons why a particular school may have a large class in a given year. Reasons why there are large classes include a significant fluctuation in enrolments from one year to the next and/or a decision by the school principal not to have multi-grade classes.

Regardless of the reason why there is a large class in a particular school one year, it should be noted that in the majority of cases this is not the situation in the following year. In the main, the same schools do not have large classes year after year and so the same children are not in large classes year after year.

Where some classes in a school have class sizes of greater than 29, it is often because a decision has been taken at local level to use their teaching resources to have smaller numbers in other classes. Indeed, when the matter of why a particular school has a class of 35 in a particular grade is looked into, very often the answer is because there is another class in the same school with a much lower than average number of pupils in it.

Splitting classes may not always be an option for a particular school, because for example there might be a large group in junior infants and a small group in sixth class and so on. But where it is possible, principals should consider the benefits of having smaller multi-grade classes as against having large differences in class sizes at different levels in the school.

This Government has clearly demonstrated its commitment to improving staffing in our primary schools by hiring thousands of extra teachers in recent years and we will continue to make progress on this issue.

Joan Burton

Ceist:

357 Ms Burton asked the Minister for Education and Science the average class size at a school (details supplied) in Dublin 15; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22379/06]

The average class size in the school referred to by the Deputy for the 2005/06 school year is 29.0. Major improvements have been made in primary school staffing in recent years. Next September there will no less than 4000 extra teachers in our primary schools, compared with 2002. Not only is the average class size in our primary schools down to 24, but there is now one teacher for 17 pupils at primary level, including resource teachers etc.

Children with special needs and those from disadvantaged areas are getting more support than ever before to help them to make the most of their time at school. With the thousands of extra primary teachers appointed, recent years have seen the largest expansion in teacher numbers since the expansion of free education. Over the next two school years even more teachers will be put in place both for the above priority areas of disadvantage and special education and also under a reduction in the mainstream staffing schedule at primary level.

Primary schools are staffed on a general rule of at least one classroom teacher for every 29 children. Of course, schools with only one or two teachers have much lower staffing ratios than that — with two teachers for just 12 pupils in some cases and so on — but the general rule is that there is at least one classroom teacher for every 29 children in the school. Next year this is being reduced to 28 children per classroom teacher and in 2007/2008 it will be reduced to 27 children per classroom teacher.

The number of children in large classes has been reduced dramatically by this Government. Furthermore, what really puts the decrease in large classes in context is the fact that in 1996/97 five times more children were in classes of 35+ and ten times more children were in classes of 40+.

It is important to appreciate that there are a number of different reasons why a particular school may have a large class in a given year. Reasons why there are large classes include a significant fluctuation in enrolments from one year to the next and/or a decision by the school principal not to have multi-grade classes.

Regardless of the reason why there is a large class in a particular school one year, it should be noted that in the majority of cases this is not the situation in the following year. In the main, the same schools do not have large classes year after year and so the same children are not in large classes year after year.

Where some classes in a school have class sizes of greater than 29, it is often because a decision has been taken at local level to use their teaching resources to have smaller numbers in other classes. Indeed, when the matter of why a particular school has a class of 35 in a particular grade is looked into, very often the answer is because there is another class in the same school with a much lower than average number of pupils in it.

Splitting classes may not always be an option for a particular school, because for example there might be a large group in junior infants and a small group in sixth class and so on. But where it is possible, principals should consider the benefits of having smaller multi-grade classes as against having large differences in class sizes at different levels in the school. This Government has clearly demonstrated its commitment to improving staffing in our primary schools by hiring thousands of extra teachers in recent years and we will continue to make progress on this issue.

Joan Burton

Ceist:

358 Ms Burton asked the Minister for Education and Science the average class size at a school (details supplied) in Dublin 15; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22380/06]

Hanafin): The average class size in the school referred to by the Deputy for the 2005/06 school year is 26.5.

Major improvements have been made in primary school staffing in recent years. Next September there will no less than 4000 extra teachers in our primary schools, compared with 2002. Not only is the average class size in our primary schools down to 24, but there is now one teacher for 17 pupils at primary level, including resource teachers etc.

Children with special needs and those from disadvantaged areas are getting more support than ever before to help them to make the most of their time at school. With the thousands of extra primary teachers appointed, recent years have seen the largest expansion in teacher numbers since the expansion of free education. Over the next two school years even more teachers will be put in place both for the above priority areas of disadvantage and special education and also under a reduction in the mainstream staffing schedule at primary level. Primary schools are staffed on a general rule of at least one classroom teacher for every 29 children. Of course, schools with only one or two teachers have much lower staffing ratios than that — with two teachers for just 12 pupils in some cases and so on — but the general rule is that there is at least one classroom teacher for every 29 children in the school. Next year this is being reduced to 28 children per classroom teacher and in 2007/2008 it will be reduced to 27 children per classroom teacher.

The number of children in large classes has been reduced dramatically by this Government. Furthermore, what really puts the decrease in large classes in context is the fact that in 1996/97 five times more children were in classes of 35+ and ten times more children were in classes of 40+. It is important to appreciate that there are a number of different reasons why a particular school may have a large class in a given year. Reasons why there are large classes include a significant fluctuation in enrolments from one year to the next and/or a decision by the school principal not to have multi-grade classes.

Regardless of the reason why there is a large class in a particular school one year, it should be noted that in the majority of cases this is not the situation in the following year. In the main, the same schools do not have large classes year after year and so the same children are not in large classes year after year.

Where some classes in a school have class sizes of greater than 29, it is often because a decision has been taken at local level to use their teaching resources to have smaller numbers in other classes. Indeed, when the matter of why a particular school has a class of 35 in a particular grade is looked into, very often the answer is because there is another class in the same school with a much lower than average number of pupils in it.

Splitting classes may not always be an option for a particular school, because for example there might be a large group in junior infants and a small group in sixth class and so on. But where it is possible, principals should consider the benefits of having smaller multi-grade classes as against having large differences in class sizes at different levels in the school. This Government has clearly demonstrated its commitment to improving staffing in our primary schools by hiring thousands of extra teachers in recent years and we will continue to make progress on this issue.

Joan Burton

Ceist:

359 Ms Burton asked the Minister for Education and Science the average class size at a school (details supplied) in Dublin 15; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22381/06]

Hanafin): The average class size in the school referred to by the Deputy for the 2005/06 school year is 28.6.

Major improvements have been made in primary school staffing in recent years. Next September there will no less than 4000 extra teachers in our primary schools, compared with 2002. Not only is the average class size in our primary schools down to 24, but there is now one teacher for 17 pupils at primary level, including resource teachers etc.

Children with special needs and those from disadvantaged areas are getting more support than ever before to help them to make the most of their time at school. With the thousands of extra primary teachers appointed, recent years have seen the largest expansion in teacher numbers since the expansion of free education. Over the next two school years even more teachers will be put in place both for the above priority areas of disadvantage and special education and also under a reduction in the mainstream staffing schedule at primary level. Primary schools are staffed on a general rule of at least one classroom teacher for every 29 children. Of course, schools with only one or two teachers have much lower staffing ratios than that — with two teachers for just 12 pupils in some cases and so on — but the general rule is that there is at least one classroom teacher for every 29 children in the school. Next year this is being reduced to 28 children per classroom teacher and in 2007/2008 it will be reduced to 27 children per classroom teacher.

The number of children in large classes has been reduced dramatically by this Government. Furthermore, what really puts the decrease in large classes in context is the fact that in 1996/97 five times more children were in classes of 35+ and ten times more children were in classes of 40+. It is important to appreciate that there are a number of different reasons why a particular school may have a large class in a given year. Reasons why there are large classes include a significant fluctuation in enrolments from one year to the next and/or a decision by the school principal not to have multi-grade classes.

Regardless of the reason why there is a large class in a particular school one year, it should be noted that in the majority of cases this is not the situation in the following year. In the main, the same schools do not have large classes year after year and so the same children are not in large classes year after year.

Where some classes in a school have class sizes of greater than 29, it is often because a decision has been taken at local level to use their teaching resources to have smaller numbers in other classes. Indeed, when the matter of why a particular school has a class of 35 in a particular grade is looked into, very often the answer is because there is another class in the same school with a much lower than average number of pupils in it.

Splitting classes may not always be an option for a particular school, because for example there might be a large group in junior infants and a small group in sixth class and so on. But where it is possible, principals should consider the benefits of having smaller multi-grade classes as against having large differences in class sizes at different levels in the school. This Government has clearly demonstrated its commitment to improving staffing in our primary schools by hiring thousands of extra teachers in recent years and we will continue to make progress on this issue.

Joan Burton

Ceist:

360 Ms Burton asked the Minister for Education and Science the average class size at a school (details supplied) in Dublin 15; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22382/06]

Hanafin): The average class size in the school referred to by the Deputy for the 2005/06 school year is 27.8.

Major improvements have been made in primary school staffing in recent years. Next September there will no less than 4000 extra teachers in our primary schools, compared with 2002. Not only is the average class size in our primary schools down to 24, but there is now one teacher for 17 pupils at primary level, including resource teachers etc.

Children with special needs and those from disadvantaged areas are getting more support than ever before to help them to make the most of their time at school. With the thousands of extra primary teachers appointed, recent years have seen the largest expansion in teacher numbers since the expansion of free education. Over the next two school years even more teachers will be put in place both for the above priority areas of disadvantage and special education and also under a reduction in the mainstream staffing schedule at primary level. Primary schools are staffed on a general rule of at least one classroom teacher for every 29 children. Of course, schools with only one or two teachers have much lower staffing ratios than that — with two teachers for just 12 pupils in some cases and so on — but the general rule is that there is at least one classroom teacher for every 29 children in the school. Next year this is being reduced to 28 children per classroom teacher and in 2007/2008 it will be reduced to 27 children per classroom teacher.

The number of children in large classes has been reduced dramatically by this Government. Furthermore, what really puts the decrease in large classes in context is the fact that in 1996/97 five times more children were in classes of 35+ and ten times more children were in classes of 40+. It is important to appreciate that there are a number of different reasons why a particular school may have a large class in a given year. Reasons why there are large classes include a significant fluctuation in enrolments from one year to the next and/or a decision by the school principal not to have multi-grade classes.

Regardless of the reason why there is a large class in a particular school one year, it should be noted that in the majority of cases this is not the situation in the following year. In the main, the same schools do not have large classes year after year and so the same children are not in large classes year after year.

Where some classes in a school have class sizes of greater than 29, it is often because a decision has been taken at local level to use their teaching resources to have smaller numbers in other classes. Indeed, when the matter of why a particular school has a class of 35 in a particular grade is looked into, very often the answer is because there is another class in the same school with a much lower than average number of pupils in it.

Splitting classes may not always be an option for a particular school, because for example there might be a large group in junior infants and a small group in sixth class and so on. But where it is possible, principals should consider the benefits of having smaller multi-grade classes as against having large differences in class sizes at different levels in the school. This Government has clearly demonstrated its commitment to improving staffing in our primary schools by hiring thousands of extra teachers in recent years and we will continue to make progress on this issue.

Joan Burton

Ceist:

361 Ms Burton asked the Minister for Education and Science the average class size at a school (details supplied) in Dublin 15; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22383/06]

The average class size in the school referred to by the Deputy for the 2005/06 school year is 31.0. I should point out that, according to my Department's records, there were 627 pupils enrolled in the school at 30th September, 2005 and a Principal and 22 mainstream class teachers, including one developing school post, were allocated to the school for the current school year. Accordingly, the average class size in the school should be 28.5. As a result of the improvement in the staffing schedule, the teacher allocation for the school for the 2006/07 school year will be Principal and 23 mainstream class teachers.

Major improvements have been made in primary school staffing in recent years. Next September there will no less than 4000 extra teachers in our primary schools, compared with 2002. Not only is the average class size in our primary schools down to 24, but there is now one teacher for 17 pupils at primary level, including resource teachers etc.

Children with special needs and those from disadvantaged areas are getting more support than ever before to help them to make the most of their time at school. With the thousands of extra primary teachers appointed, recent years have seen the largest expansion in teacher numbers since the expansion of free education. Over the next two school years even more teachers will be put in place both for the above priority areas of disadvantage and special education and also under a reduction in the mainstream staffing schedule at primary level. Primary schools are staffed on a general rule of at least one classroom teacher for every 29 children. Of course, schools with only one or two teachers have much lower staffing ratios than that — with two teachers for just 12 pupils in some cases and so on — but the general rule is that there is at least one classroom teacher for every 29 children in the school. Next year this is being reduced to 28 children per classroom teacher and in 2007/2008 it will be reduced to 27 children per classroom teacher.

The number of children in large classes has been reduced dramatically by this Government. Furthermore, what really puts the decrease in large classes in context is the fact that in 1996/97 five times more children were in classes of 35+ and ten times more children were in classes of 40+. It is important to appreciate that there are a number of different reasons why a particular school may have a large class in a given year. Reasons why there are large classes include a significant fluctuation in enrolments from one year to the next and/or a decision by the school principal not to have multi-grade classes.

Regardless of the reason why there is a large class in a particular school one year, it should be noted that in the majority of cases this is not the situation in the following year. In the main, the same schools do not have large classes year after year and so the same children are not in large classes year after year.

Where some classes in a school have class sizes of greater than 29, it is often because a decision has been taken at local level to use their teaching resources to have smaller numbers in other classes. Indeed, when the matter of why a particular school has a class of 35 in a particular grade is looked into, very often the answer is because there is another class in the same school with a much lower than average number of pupils in it.

Splitting classes may not always be an option for a particular school, because for example there might be a large group in junior infants and a small group in sixth class and so on. But where it is possible, principals should consider the benefits of having smaller multi-grade classes as against having large differences in class sizes at different levels in the school. This Government has clearly demonstrated its commitment to improving staffing in our primary schools by hiring thousands of extra teachers in recent years and we will continue to make progress on this issue.

Joan Burton

Ceist:

362 Ms Burton asked the Minister for Education and Science the average class size at a school (details supplied) in Dublin 15; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22384/06]

The average class size in the school referred to by the Deputy for the 2005/06 school year is 29.3.

Major improvements have been made in primary school staffing in recent years. Next September there will no less than 4000 extra teachers in our primary schools, compared with 2002. Not only is the average class size in our primary schools down to 24, but there is now one teacher for 17 pupils at primary level, including resource teachers etc.

Children with special needs and those from disadvantaged areas are getting more support than ever before to help them to make the most of their time at school. With the thousands of extra primary teachers appointed, recent years have seen the largest expansion in teacher numbers since the expansion of free education. Over the next two school years even more teachers will be put in place both for the above priority areas of disadvantage and special education and also under a reduction in the mainstream staffing schedule at primary level. Primary schools are staffed on a general rule of at least one classroom teacher for every 29 children. Of course, schools with only one or two teachers have much lower staffing ratios than that — with two teachers for just 12 pupils in some cases and so on — but the general rule is that there is at least one classroom teacher for every 29 children in the school. Next year this is being reduced to 28 children per classroom teacher and in 2007/2008 it will be reduced to 27 children per classroom teacher.

The number of children in large classes has been reduced dramatically by this Government. Furthermore, what really puts the decrease in large classes in context is the fact that in 1996/97 five times more children were in classes of 35+ and ten times more children were in classes of 40+. It is important to appreciate that there are a number of different reasons why a particular school may have a large class in a given year. Reasons why there are large classes include a significant fluctuation in enrolments from one year to the next and/or a decision by the school principal not to have multi-grade classes.

Regardless of the reason why there is a large class in a particular school one year, it should be noted that in the majority of cases this is not the situation in the following year. In the main, the same schools do not have large classes year after year and so the same children are not in large classes year after year.

Where some classes in a school have class sizes of greater than 29, it is often because a decision has been taken at local level to use their teaching resources to have smaller numbers in other classes. Indeed, when the matter of why a particular school has a class of 35 in a particular grade is looked into, very often the answer is because there is another class in the same school with a much lower than average number of pupils in it.

Splitting classes may not always be an option for a particular school, because for example there might be a large group in junior infants and a small group in sixth class and so on. But where it is possible, principals should consider the benefits of having smaller multi-grade classes as against having large differences in class sizes at different levels in the school. This Government has clearly demonstrated its commitment to improving staffing in our primary schools by hiring thousands of extra teachers in recent years and we will continue to make progress on this issue.

Joan Burton

Ceist:

363 Ms Burton asked the Minister for Education and Science the average class size at a school (details supplied) in Dublin 15; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22385/06]

The average class size in the school referred to by the Deputy for the 2005/06 school year is 28.1.

Major improvements have been made in primary school staffing in recent years. Next September there will no less than 4000 extra teachers in our primary schools, compared with 2002. Not only is the average class size in our primary schools down to 24, but there is now one teacher for 17 pupils at primary level, including resource teachers etc.

Children with special needs and those from disadvantaged areas are getting more support than ever before to help them to make the most of their time at school.

With the thousands of extra primary teachers appointed, recent years have seen the largest expansion in teacher numbers since the expansion of free education. Over the next two school years even more teachers will be put in place both for the above priority areas of disadvantage and special education and also under a reduction in the mainstream staffing schedule at primary level.

Primary schools are staffed on a general rule of at least one classroom teacher for every 29 children. Of course, schools with only one or two teachers have much lower staffing ratios than that — with two teachers for just 12 pupils in some cases and so on — but the general rule is that there is at least one classroom teacher for every 29 children in the school. Next year this is being reduced to 28 children per classroom teacher and in 2007/2008 it will be reduced to 27 children per classroom teacher.

The number of children in large classes has been reduced dramatically by this Government. Furthermore, what really puts the decrease in large classes in context is the fact that in 1996/97 five times more children were in classes of 35+ and ten times more children were in classes of 40+.

It is important to appreciate that there are a number of different reasons why a particular school may have a large class in a given year. Reasons why there are large classes include a significant fluctuation in enrolments from one year to the next and/or a decision by the school principal not to have multi-grade classes. Regardless of the reason why there is a large class in a particular school one year, it should be noted that in the majority of cases this is not the situation in the following year. In the main, the same schools do not have large classes year after year and so the same children are not in large classes year after year.

Where some classes in a school have class sizes of greater than 29, it is often because a decision has been taken at local level to use their teaching resources to have smaller numbers in other classes. Indeed, when the matter of why a particular school has a class of 35 in a particular grade is looked into, very often the answer is because there is another class in the same school with a much lower than average number of pupils in it. Splitting classes may not always be an option for a particular school, because for example there might be a large group in junior infants and a small group in sixth class and so on. But where it is possible, principals should consider the benefits of having smaller multi-grade classes as against having large differences in class sizes at different levels in the school.

This Government has clearly demonstrated its commitment to improving staffing in our primary schools by hiring thousands of extra teachers in recent years and we will continue to make progress on this issue.

Joan Burton

Ceist:

364 Ms Burton asked the Minister for Education and Science the average class size at a school (details supplied) in Dublin 15; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22386/06]

The average class size in the school referred to by the Deputy for the 2005/06 school year is 30.6. I should point out that, according to my Department's records, there were 734 pupils enrolled in the school at 30th September, 2005 and a Principal and 26 mainstream class teachers were allocated to the school for the current school year. Accordingly, the average class size in the school should be 28.2.

Major improvements have been made in primary school staffing in recent years. Next September there will no less than 4000 extra teachers in our primary schools, compared with 2002. Not only is the average class size in our primary schools down to 24, but there is now one teacher for 17 pupils at primary level, including resource teachers etc.

Children with special needs and those from disadvantaged areas are getting more support than ever before to help them to make the most of their time at school.

With the thousands of extra primary teachers appointed, recent years have seen the largest expansion in teacher numbers since the expansion of free education. Over the next two school years even more teachers will be put in place both for the above priority areas of disadvantage and special education and also under a reduction in the mainstream staffing schedule at primary level.

Primary schools are staffed on a general rule of at least one classroom teacher for every 29 children. Of course, schools with only one or two teachers have much lower staffing ratios than that — with two teachers for just 12 pupils in some cases and so on — but the general rule is that there is at least one classroom teacher for every 29 children in the school. Next year this is being reduced to 28 children per classroom teacher and in 2007/2008 it will be reduced to 27 children per classroom teacher.

The number of children in large classes has been reduced dramatically by this Government. Furthermore, what really puts the decrease in large classes in context is the fact that in 1996/97 five times more children were in classes of 35+ and ten times more children were in classes of 40+.

It is important to appreciate that there are a number of different reasons why a particular school may have a large class in a given year. Reasons why there are large classes include a significant fluctuation in enrolments from one year to the next and/or a decision by the school principal not to have multi-grade classes. Regardless of the reason why there is a large class in a particular school one year, it should be noted that in the majority of cases this is not the situation in the following year. In the main, the same schools do not have large classes year after year and so the same children are not in large classes year after year.

Where some classes in a school have class sizes of greater than 29, it is often because a decision has been taken at local level to use their teaching resources to have smaller numbers in other classes. Indeed, when the matter of why a particular school has a class of 35 in a particular grade is looked into, very often the answer is because there is another class in the same school with a much lower than average number of pupils in it. Splitting classes may not always be an option for a particular school, because for example there might be a large group in junior infants and a small group in sixth class and so on. But where it is possible, principals should consider the benefits of having smaller multi-grade classes as against having large differences in class sizes at different levels in the school.

This Government has clearly demonstrated its commitment to improving staffing in our primary schools by hiring thousands of extra teachers in recent years and we will continue to make progress on this issue.

Joan Burton

Ceist:

365 Ms Burton asked the Minister for Education and Science the average class size at a school (details supplied) in Dublin 15; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22387/06]

The average class size in the school referred to by the Deputy for the 2005/06 school year is 29.8.

Major improvements have been made in primary school staffing in recent years. Next September there will no less than 4000 extra teachers in our primary schools, compared with 2002. Not only is the average class size in our primary schools down to 24, but there is now one teacher for 17 pupils at primary level, including resource teachers etc.

Children with special needs and those from disadvantaged areas are getting more support than ever before to help them to make the most of their time at school.

With the thousands of extra primary teachers appointed, recent years have seen the largest expansion in teacher numbers since the expansion of free education. Over the next two school years even more teachers will be put in place both for the above priority areas of disadvantage and special education and also under a reduction in the mainstream staffing schedule at primary level.

Primary schools are staffed on a general rule of at least one classroom teacher for every 29 children. Of course, schools with only one or two teachers have much lower staffing ratios than that — with two teachers for just 12 pupils in some cases and so on — but the general rule is that there is at least one classroom teacher for every 29 children in the school. Next year this is being reduced to 28 children per classroom teacher and in 2007/2008 it will be reduced to 27 children per classroom teacher.

The number of children in large classes has been reduced dramatically by this Government. Furthermore, what really puts the decrease in large classes in context is the fact that in 1996/97 five times more children were in classes of 35+ and ten times more children were in classes of 40+.

It is important to appreciate that there are a number of different reasons why a particular school may have a large class in a given year. Reasons why there are large classes include a significant fluctuation in enrolments from one year to the next and/or a decision by the school principal not to have multi-grade classes. Regardless of the reason why there is a large class in a particular school one year, it should be noted that in the majority of cases this is not the situation in the following year. In the main, the same schools do not have large classes year after year and so the same children are not in large classes year after year.

Where some classes in a school have class sizes of greater than 29, it is often because a decision has been taken at local level to use their teaching resources to have smaller numbers in other classes. Indeed, when the matter of why a particular school has a class of 35 in a particular grade is looked into, very often the answer is because there is another class in the same school with a much lower than average number of pupils in it. Splitting classes may not always be an option for a particular school, because for example there might be a large group in junior infants and a small group in sixth class and so on. But where it is possible, principals should consider the benefits of having smaller multi-grade classes as against having large differences in class sizes at different levels in the school.

This Government has clearly demonstrated its commitment to improving staffing in our primary schools by hiring thousands of extra teachers in recent years and we will continue to make progress on this issue.

Joan Burton

Ceist:

366 Ms Burton asked the Minister for Education and Science the average class size at a school (details supplied) in Dublin 15; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22388/06]

The average class size in the school referred to by the Deputy for the 2005/06 school year is 29.8.

Major improvements have been made in primary school staffing in recent years. Next September there will no less than 4000 extra teachers in our primary schools, compared with 2002. Not only is the average class size in our primary schools down to 24, but there is now one teacher for 17 pupils at primary level, including resource teachers etc.

Children with special needs and those from disadvantaged areas are getting more support than ever before to help them to make the most of their time at school.

With the thousands of extra primary teachers appointed, recent years have seen the largest expansion in teacher numbers since the expansion of free education. Over the next two school years even more teachers will be put in place both for the above priority areas of disadvantage and special education and also under a reduction in the mainstream staffing schedule at primary level.

Primary schools are staffed on a general rule of at least one classroom teacher for every 29 children. Of course, schools with only one or two teachers have much lower staffing ratios than that — with two teachers for just 12 pupils in some cases and so on — but the general rule is that there is at least one classroom teacher for every 29 children in the school. Next year this is being reduced to 28 children per classroom teacher and in 2007/2008 it will be reduced to 27 children per classroom teacher.

The number of children in large classes has been reduced dramatically by this Government. Furthermore, what really puts the decrease in large classes in context is the fact that in 1996/97 five times more children were in classes of 35+ and ten times more children were in classes of 40+.

It is important to appreciate that there are a number of different reasons why a particular school may have a large class in a given year. Reasons why there are large classes include a significant fluctuation in enrolments from one year to the next and/or a decision by the school principal not to have multi-grade classes. Regardless of the reason why there is a large class in a particular school one year, it should be noted that in the majority of cases this is not the situation in the following year. In the main, the same schools do not have large classes year after year and so the same children are not in large classes year after year.

Where some classes in a school have class sizes of greater than 29, it is often because a decision has been taken at local level to use their teaching resources to have smaller numbers in other classes. Indeed, when the matter of why a particular school has a class of 35 in a particular grade is looked into, very often the answer is because there is another class in the same school with a much lower than average number of pupils in it. Splitting classes may not always be an option for a particular school, because for example there might be a large group in junior infants and a small group in sixth class and so on. But where it is possible, principals should consider the benefits of having smaller multi-grade classes as against having large differences in class sizes at different levels in the school.

This Government has clearly demonstrated its commitment to improving staffing in our primary schools by hiring thousands of extra teachers in recent years and we will continue to make progress on this issue.

Special Educational Needs.

Olwyn Enright

Ceist:

367 Ms Enright asked the Minister for Education and Science the reason a person (details supplied) in Donegal, who suffers from dyslexia and who will be sitting their leaving certificate in June 2006, has been refused reader assistance and waiver; the assistance they can avail of before the exam; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22405/06]

The State Examinations Commission has statutory responsibility for operational matters relating to the certificate examinations, including the scheme of reasonable accommodation for persons with special needs. In view of this, I have forwarded your query to the State Examinations Commission for direct reply to you.

Schools Recognition.

Jim O'Keeffe

Ceist:

368 Mr. J. O’Keeffe asked the Minister for Education and Science if her attention has been drawn to the proposals to establish a residential Irish language secondary school on Oileán Chléire in west Cork; if she will nominate an official from her Department to engage in discussion with a group (details supplied) who are promoting the proposal in order that it can be examined and developed for consideration; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22465/06]

I am not aware of any such proposal. Officials in the School Planning Section of my Department will fully consider the matter should a proposal be received from the group in question.

Schools Building Projects.

Jim O'Keeffe

Ceist:

369 Mr. J. O’Keeffe asked the Minister for Education and Science the band rating allocated to both schools in relation to the proposed new community college and gaelscoil for Bantry in west Cork; the estimated cost of the proposed school bundle as referred to by her in Parliamentary Question No. 588 of 30 May 2006; and if her attention has been drawn to the fact that a site has been secured for these schools and outline planning permission has been obtained. [22466/06]

My Department's Planning Section has assigned a band rating of 1.4 to the new community school and a band rating of 2.2 for the Gaelscoil Bheanntrai. The capital value of a PPP school bundle needs to be €50m approximately to attract sufficient interest from the private sector and to ensure my Department receives value for money over the lifetime of the contract.

I am aware that County Cork VEC has entered into a contract with Cork County Council to purchase the site for the new community college and Gaelscoil Bheanntrai and that a grant of outline planning permission was received on the 17 May 2006 for both the community school and Gaelscoil Bheanntrai. As indicated to the Deputy in my reply of 30 May 2006 the precise make up of the next PPP school bundle will be determined by my Department in consultation with the National Development Finance Agency.

Pupil-Teacher Ratio.

Joan Burton

Ceist:

370 Ms Burton asked the Minister for Education and Science the number of children of nine years of age and under in classes of more than 20 at a school (details supplied) in Dublin 15; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22550/06]

There are 128 children of nine years of age and under in classes of more than 20 at the school referred to by the Deputy in the current school year.

Major improvements have been made in primary school staffing in recent years. Next September there will no less than 4000 extra teachers in our primary schools, compared with 2002. Not only is the average class size in our primary schools down to 24, but there is now one teacher for 17 pupils at primary level, including resource teachers etc.

Children with special needs and those from disadvantaged areas are getting more support than ever before to help them to make the most of their time at school. With the thousands of extra primary teachers appointed, recent years have seen the largest expansion in teacher numbers since the expansion of free education. Over the next two school years even more teachers will be put in place both for the above priority areas of disadvantage and special education and also under a reduction in the mainstream staffing schedule at primary level. Primary schools are staffed on a general rule of at least one classroom teacher for every 29 children. Of course, schools with only one or two teachers have much lower staffing ratios than that — with two teachers for just 12 pupils in some cases and so on — but the general rule is that there is at least one classroom teacher for every 29 children in the school. Next year this is being reduced to 28 children per classroom teacher and in 2007/2008 it will be reduced to 27 children per classroom teacher.

The number of children in large classes has been reduced dramatically by this Government. Furthermore, what really puts the decrease in large classes in context is the fact that in 1996/97 five times more children were in classes of 35+ and ten times more children were in classes of 40+. It is important to appreciate that there are a number of different reasons why a particular school may have a large class in a given year. Reasons why there are large classes include a significant fluctuation in enrolments from one year to the next and/or a decision by the school principal not to have multi-grade classes.

Regardless of the reason why there is a large class in a particular school one year, it should be noted that in the majority of cases this is not the situation in the following year. In the main, the same schools do not have large classes year after year and so the same children are not in large classes year after year.

Where some classes in a school have class sizes of greater than 29, it is often because a decision has been taken at local level to use their teaching resources to have smaller numbers in other classes. Indeed, when the matter of why a particular school has a class of 35 in a particular grade is looked into, very often the answer is because there is another class in the same school with a much lower than average number of pupils in it.

Splitting classes may not always be an option for a particular school, because for example there might be a large group in junior infants and a small group in sixth class and so on. But where it is possible, principals should consider the benefits of having smaller multi-grade classes as against having large differences in class sizes at different levels in the school. This Government has clearly demonstrated its commitment to improving staffing in our primary schools by hiring thousands of extra teachers in recent years and we will continue to make progress on this issue.

Joan Burton

Ceist:

371 Ms Burton asked the Minister for Education and Science the number of children of nine years of age and under in classes of more than 20 at a school (details supplied) in Dublin 15; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22551/06]

Hanafin): There are 472 children of nine years of age and under in classes of more than 20 at the school referred to by the Deputy in the current school year.

Major improvements have been made in primary school staffing in recent years. Next September there will no less than 4000 extra teachers in our primary schools, compared with 2002. Not only is the average class size in our primary schools down to 24, but there is now one teacher for 17 pupils at primary level, including resource teachers etc.

Children with special needs and those from disadvantaged areas are getting more support than ever before to help them to make the most of their time at school. With the thousands of extra primary teachers appointed, recent years have seen the largest expansion in teacher numbers since the expansion of free education. Over the next two school years even more teachers will be put in place both for the above priority areas of disadvantage and special education and also under a reduction in the mainstream staffing schedule at primary level. Primary schools are staffed on a general rule of at least one classroom teacher for every 29 children. Of course, schools with only one or two teachers have much lower staffing ratios than that — with two teachers for just 12 pupils in some cases and so on — but the general rule is that there is at least one classroom teacher for every 29 children in the school. Next year this is being reduced to 28 children per classroom teacher and in 2007/2008 it will be reduced to 27 children per classroom teacher.

The number of children in large classes has been reduced dramatically by this Government. Furthermore, what really puts the decrease in large classes in context is the fact that in 1996/97 five times more children were in classes of 35+ and ten times more children were in classes of 40+. It is important to appreciate that there are a number of different reasons why a particular school may have a large class in a given year. Reasons why there are large classes include a significant fluctuation in enrolments from one year to the next and/or a decision by the school principal not to have multi-grade classes.

Regardless of the reason why there is a large class in a particular school one year, it should be noted that in the majority of cases this is not the situation in the following year. In the main, the same schools do not have large classes year after year and so the same children are not in large classes year after year.

Where some classes in a school have class sizes of greater than 29, it is often because a decision has been taken at local level to use their teaching resources to have smaller numbers in other classes. Indeed, when the matter of why a particular school has a class of 35 in a particular grade is looked into, very often the answer is because there is another class in the same school with a much lower than average number of pupils in it.

Splitting classes may not always be an option for a particular school, because for example there might be a large group in junior infants and a small group in sixth class and so on. But where it is possible, principals should consider the benefits of having smaller multi-grade classes as against having large differences in class sizes at different levels in the school. This Government has clearly demonstrated its commitment to improving staffing in our primary schools by hiring thousands of extra teachers in recent years and we will continue to make progress on this issue.

Joan Burton

Ceist:

372 Ms Burton asked the Minister for Education and Science the number of children of nine years of age and under in classes of more than 20 at a school (details supplied) in Dublin 15; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22552/06]

There are 70 children of nine years of age and under in classes of more than 20 at the school referred to by the Deputy in the current school year.

Major improvements have been made in primary school staffing in recent years. Next September there will no less than 4000 extra teachers in our primary schools, compared with 2002. Not only is the average class size in our primary schools down to 24, but there is now one teacher for 17 pupils at primary level, including resource teachers etc.

Children with special needs and those from disadvantaged areas are getting more support than ever before to help them to make the most of their time at school. With the thousands of extra primary teachers appointed, recent years have seen the largest expansion in teacher numbers since the expansion of free education. Over the next two school years even more teachers will be put in place both for the above priority areas of disadvantage and special education and also under a reduction in the mainstream staffing schedule at primary level. Primary schools are staffed on a general rule of at least one classroom teacher for every 29 children. Of course, schools with only one or two teachers have much lower staffing ratios than that — with two teachers for just 12 pupils in some cases and so on — but the general rule is that there is at least one classroom teacher for every 29 children in the school. Next year this is being reduced to 28 children per classroom teacher and in 2007/2008 it will be reduced to 27 children per classroom teacher.

The number of children in large classes has been reduced dramatically by this Government. Furthermore, what really puts the decrease in large classes in context is the fact that in 1996/97 five times more children were in classes of 35+ and ten times more children were in classes of 40+. It is important to appreciate that there are a number of different reasons why a particular school may have a large class in a given year. Reasons why there are large classes include a significant fluctuation in enrolments from one year to the next and/or a decision by the school principal not to have multi-grade classes.

Regardless of the reason why there is a large class in a particular school one year, it should be noted that in the majority of cases this is not the situation in the following year. In the main, the same schools do not have large classes year after year and so the same children are not in large classes year after year.

Where some classes in a school have class sizes of greater than 29, it is often because a decision has been taken at local level to use their teaching resources to have smaller numbers in other classes. Indeed, when the matter of why a particular school has a class of 35 in a particular grade is looked into, very often the answer is because there is another class in the same school with a much lower than average number of pupils in it.

Splitting classes may not always be an option for a particular school, because for example there might be a large group in junior infants and a small group in sixth class and so on. But where it is possible, principals should consider the benefits of having smaller multi-grade classes as against having large differences in class sizes at different levels in the school. This Government has clearly demonstrated its commitment to improving staffing in our primary schools by hiring thousands of extra teachers in recent years and we will continue to make progress on this issue.

Joan Burton

Ceist:

373 Ms Burton asked the Minister for Education and Science the average class size at a school (details supplied) in Dublin 15; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22553/06]

The average class size in the school referred to by the Deputy for the 2005/06 school year is 27.2.

Major improvements have been made in primary school staffing in recent years. Next September there will no less than 4000 extra teachers in our primary schools, compared with 2002. Not only is the average class size in our primary schools down to 24, but there is now one teacher for 17 pupils at primary level, including resource teachers etc.

Children with special needs and those from disadvantaged areas are getting more support than ever before to help them to make the most of their time at school. With the thousands of extra primary teachers appointed, recent years have seen the largest expansion in teacher numbers since the expansion of free education. Over the next two school years even more teachers will be put in place both for the above priority areas of disadvantage and special education and also under a reduction in the mainstream staffing schedule at primary level. Primary schools are staffed on a general rule of at least one classroom teacher for every 29 children. Of course, schools with only one or two teachers have much lower staffing ratios than that — with two teachers for just 12 pupils in some cases and so on — but the general rule is that there is at least one classroom teacher for every 29 children in the school. Next year this is being reduced to 28 children per classroom teacher and in 2007/2008 it will be reduced to 27 children per classroom teacher.

The number of children in large classes has been reduced dramatically by this Government. Furthermore, what really puts the decrease in large classes in context is the fact that in 1996/97 five times more children were in classes of 35+ and ten times more children were in classes of 40+. It is important to appreciate that there are a number of different reasons why a particular school may have a large class in a given year. Reasons why there are large classes include a significant fluctuation in enrolments from one year to the next and/or a decision by the school principal not to have multi-grade classes.

Regardless of the reason why there is a large class in a particular school one year, it should be noted that in the majority of cases this is not the situation in the following year. In the main, the same schools do not have large classes year after year and so the same children are not in large classes year after year.

Where some classes in a school have class sizes of greater than 29, it is often because a decision has been taken at local level to use their teaching resources to have smaller numbers in other classes. Indeed, when the matter of why a particular school has a class of 35 in a particular grade is looked into, very often the answer is because there is another class in the same school with a much lower than average number of pupils in it.

Splitting classes may not always be an option for a particular school, because for example there might be a large group in junior infants and a small group in sixth class and so on. But where it is possible, principals should consider the benefits of having smaller multi-grade classes as against having large differences in class sizes at different levels in the school. This Government has clearly demonstrated its commitment to improving staffing in our primary schools by hiring thousands of extra teachers in recent years and we will continue to make progress on this issue.

Joan Burton

Ceist:

374 Ms Burton asked the Minister for Education and Science the average class size at a school (details supplied) in Dublin 15; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22554/06]

The average class size in the school referred to by the Deputy for the 2005/06 school year is 26.3.

Major improvements have been made in primary school staffing in recent years. Next September there will no less than 4000 extra teachers in our primary schools, compared with 2002. Not only is the average class size in our primary schools down to 24, but there is now one teacher for 17 pupils at primary level, including resource teachers etc.

Children with special needs and those from disadvantaged areas are getting more support than ever before to help them to make the most of their time at school. With the thousands of extra primary teachers appointed, recent years have seen the largest expansion in teacher numbers since the expansion of free education. Over the next two school years even more teachers will be put in place both for the above priority areas of disadvantage and special education and also under a reduction in the mainstream staffing schedule at primary level. Primary schools are staffed on a general rule of at least one classroom teacher for every 29 children. Of course, schools with only one or two teachers have much lower staffing ratios than that — with two teachers for just 12 pupils in some cases and so on — but the general rule is that there is at least one classroom teacher for every 29 children in the school. Next year this is being reduced to 28 children per classroom teacher and in 2007/2008 it will be reduced to 27 children per classroom teacher.

The number of children in large classes has been reduced dramatically by this Government. Furthermore, what really puts the decrease in large classes in context is the fact that in 1996/97 five times more children were in classes of 35+ and ten times more children were in classes of 40+. It is important to appreciate that there are a number of different reasons why a particular school may have a large class in a given year. Reasons why there are large classes include a significant fluctuation in enrolments from one year to the next and/or a decision by the school principal not to have multi-grade classes.

Regardless of the reason why there is a large class in a particular school one year, it should be noted that in the majority of cases this is not the situation in the following year. In the main, the same schools do not have large classes year after year and so the same children are not in large classes year after year.

Where some classes in a school have class sizes of greater than 29, it is often because a decision has been taken at local level to use their teaching resources to have smaller numbers in other classes. Indeed, when the matter of why a particular school has a class of 35 in a particular grade is looked into, very often the answer is because there is another class in the same school with a much lower than average number of pupils in it.

Splitting classes may not always be an option for a particular school, because for example there might be a large group in junior infants and a small group in sixth class and so on. But where it is possible, principals should consider the benefits of having smaller multi-grade classes as against having large differences in class sizes at different levels in the school. This Government has clearly demonstrated its commitment to improving staffing in our primary schools by hiring thousands of extra teachers in recent years and we will continue to make progress on this issue.

Joan Burton

Ceist:

375 Ms Burton asked the Minister for Education and Science the number of classes in a school (details supplied) in Dublin 15 which have 30 or more children; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22555/06]

There are 16 classes of 30 or more children in the school referred to by the Deputy in the current school year.

Major improvements have been made in primary school staffing in recent years. Next September there will no less than 4000 extra teachers in our primary schools, compared with 2002. Not only is the average class size in our primary schools down to 24, but there is now one teacher for 17 pupils at primary level, including resource teachers etc.

Children with special needs and those from disadvantaged areas are getting more support than ever before to help them to make the most of their time at school. With the thousands of extra primary teachers appointed, recent years have seen the largest expansion in teacher numbers since the expansion of free education. Over the next two school years even more teachers will be put in place both for the above priority areas of disadvantage and special education and also under a reduction in the mainstream staffing schedule at primary level. Primary schools are staffed on a general rule of at least one classroom teacher for every 29 children. Of course, schools with only one or two teachers have much lower staffing ratios than that — with two teachers for just 12 pupils in some cases and so on — but the general rule is that there is at least one classroom teacher for every 29 children in the school. Next year this is being reduced to 28 children per classroom teacher and in 2007/2008 it will be reduced to 27 children per classroom teacher.

The number of children in large classes has been reduced dramatically by this Government. Furthermore, what really puts the decrease in large classes in context is the fact that in 1996/97 five times more children were in classes of 35+ and ten times more children were in classes of 40+. It is important to appreciate that there are a number of different reasons why a particular school may have a large class in a given year. Reasons why there are large classes include a significant fluctuation in enrolments from one year to the next and/or a decision by the school principal not to have multi-grade classes.

Regardless of the reason why there is a large class in a particular school one year, it should be noted that in the majority of cases this is not the situation in the following year. In the main, the same schools do not have large classes year after year and so the same children are not in large classes year after year.

Where some classes in a school have class sizes of greater than 29, it is often because a decision has been taken at local level to use their teaching resources to have smaller numbers in other classes. Indeed, when the matter of why a particular school has a class of 35 in a particular grade is looked into, very often the answer is because there is another class in the same school with a much lower than average number of pupils in it.

Splitting classes may not always be an option for a particular school, because for example there might be a large group in junior infants and a small group in sixth class and so on. But where it is possible, principals should consider the benefits of having smaller multi-grade classes as against having large differences in class sizes at different levels in the school. This Government has clearly demonstrated its commitment to improving staffing in our primary schools by hiring thousands of extra teachers in recent years and we will continue to make progress on this issue.

Joan Burton

Ceist:

376 Ms Burton asked the Minister for Education and Science the number of classes in a school (details supplied) in Dublin 15 which have 30 or more children; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22556/06]

There are 3 classes of 30 or more children in the school referred to by the Deputy in the current school year.

Major improvements have been made in primary school staffing in recent years. Next September there will no less than 4000 extra teachers in our primary schools, compared with 2002. Not only is the average class size in our primary schools down to 24, but there is now one teacher for 17 pupils at primary level, including resource teachers etc.

Children with special needs and those from disadvantaged areas are getting more support than ever before to help them to make the most of their time at school. With the thousands of extra primary teachers appointed, recent years have seen the largest expansion in teacher numbers since the expansion of free education. Over the next two school years even more teachers will be put in place both for the above priority areas of disadvantage and special education and also under a reduction in the mainstream staffing schedule at primary level. Primary schools are staffed on a general rule of at least one classroom teacher for every 29 children. Of course, schools with only one or two teachers have much lower staffing ratios than that — with two teachers for just 12 pupils in some cases and so on — but the general rule is that there is at least one classroom teacher for every 29 children in the school. Next year this is being reduced to 28 children per classroom teacher and in 2007/2008 it will be reduced to 27 children per classroom teacher.

The number of children in large classes has been reduced dramatically by this Government. Furthermore, what really puts the decrease in large classes in context is the fact that in 1996/97 five times more children were in classes of 35+ and ten times more children were in classes of 40+. It is important to appreciate that there are a number of different reasons why a particular school may have a large class in a given year. Reasons why there are large classes include a significant fluctuation in enrolments from one year to the next and/or a decision by the school principal not to have multi-grade classes.

Regardless of the reason why there is a large class in a particular school one year, it should be noted that in the majority of cases this is not the situation in the following year. In the main, the same schools do not have large classes year after year and so the same children are not in large classes year after year.

Where some classes in a school have class sizes of greater than 29, it is often because a decision has been taken at local level to use their teaching resources to have smaller numbers in other classes. Indeed, when the matter of why a particular school has a class of 35 in a particular grade is looked into, very often the answer is because there is another class in the same school with a much lower than average number of pupils in it.

Splitting classes may not always be an option for a particular school, because for example there might be a large group in junior infants and a small group in sixth class and so on. But where it is possible, principals should consider the benefits of having smaller multi-grade classes as against having large differences in class sizes at different levels in the school. This Government has clearly demonstrated its commitment to improving staffing in our primary schools by hiring thousands of extra teachers in recent years and we will continue to make progress on this issue.

Joan Burton

Ceist:

377 Ms Burton asked the Minister for Education and Science the number of classes in a school (details supplied) in Dublin 15 which have 30 or more children; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22557/06]

There is 1 class of 30 or more children in the school referred to by the Deputy in the current school year.

Major improvements have been made in primary school staffing in recent years. Next September there will no less than 4000 extra teachers in our primary schools, compared with 2002. Not only is the average class size in our primary schools down to 24, but there is now one teacher for 17 pupils at primary level, including resource teachers etc.

Children with special needs and those from disadvantaged areas are getting more support than ever before to help them to make the most of their time at school. With the thousands of extra primary teachers appointed, recent years have seen the largest expansion in teacher numbers since the expansion of free education. Over the next two school years even more teachers will be put in place both for the above priority areas of disadvantage and special education and also under a reduction in the mainstream staffing schedule at primary level. Primary schools are staffed on a general rule of at least one classroom teacher for every 29 children. Of course, schools with only one or two teachers have much lower staffing ratios than that — with two teachers for just 12 pupils in some cases and so on — but the general rule is that there is at least one classroom teacher for every 29 children in the school. Next year this is being reduced to 28 children per classroom teacher and in 2007/2008 it will be reduced to 27 children per classroom teacher.

The number of children in large classes has been reduced dramatically by this Government. Furthermore, what really puts the decrease in large classes in context is the fact that in 1996/97 five times more children were in classes of 35+ and ten times more children were in classes of 40+. It is important to appreciate that there are a number of different reasons why a particular school may have a large class in a given year. Reasons why there are large classes include a significant fluctuation in enrolments from one year to the next and/or a decision by the school principal not to have multi-grade classes.

Regardless of the reason why there is a large class in a particular school one year, it should be noted that in the majority of cases this is not the situation in the following year. In the main, the same schools do not have large classes year after year and so the same children are not in large classes year after year.

Where some classes in a school have class sizes of greater than 29, it is often because a decision has been taken at local level to use their teaching resources to have smaller numbers in other classes. Indeed, when the matter of why a particular school has a class of 35 in a particular grade is looked into, very often the answer is because there is another class in the same school with a much lower than average number of pupils in it.

Splitting classes may not always be an option for a particular school, because for example there might be a large group in junior infants and a small group in sixth class and so on. But where it is possible, principals should consider the benefits of having smaller multi-grade classes as against having large differences in class sizes at different levels in the school. This Government has clearly demonstrated its commitment to improving staffing in our primary schools by hiring thousands of extra teachers in recent years and we will continue to make progress on this issue.

Educational Projects.

Niall Blaney

Ceist:

378 Mr. Blaney asked the Minister for Education and Science if a school (details supplied) in County Donegal will be included in the school support programme; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22558/06]

I wish to assure the Deputy that no school has been told that they are going to lose any of the resources that they have been receiving under existing schemes for tackling disadvantage as a result of the introduction of the new DEIS initiative. On the contrary, the new School Support Programme is aimed at providing even more extra resources for the most disadvantaged schools in the country.

Schools that did not qualify for the new programme will keep the extra resources they are getting under existing schemes for the 2006/07 school year and after that they will continue to get support in line with the level of disadvantage among their pupils.

I am sure the Deputy would agree that it is important to make sure that schools serving the most disadvantaged communities get all the extra support possible and will welcome the extra resources that DEIS will provide for schools in Donegal.

It is precisely with this goal in mind that DEIS was designed. For example, over the years, no less than 8 separate schemes for disadvantaged primary schools have been put in place. Some schools were benefiting from just one or two of these and others were benefiting from more. The DEIS initiative is designed to ensure that the most disadvantaged schools benefit from a comprehensive package of supports, while ensuring that others continue to get support in line with the level of disadvantage among their pupils.

I can assure the Deputy that there is no reason for schools that haven't been identified for the new programme to worry as they will continue to get support in line with the level of disadvantage among their pupils. No school has been told that they will lose any resources as a result of DEIS.

A review mechanism has been put in place to address the concerns of schools that did not qualify for inclusion in the School Support Programme but regard themselves as having a level of disadvantage which is of a scale sufficient to warrant their inclusion in the Programme. This mechanism will operate under the direction of an independent person, charged with ensuring that all relevant identification processes and procedures were properly followed in the case of schools applying for a review. The school referred to by the Deputy has submitted a review application.

It is intended that the review process will be completed by the end of the current school year. Major improvements have been made in primary school staffing in recent years. Next September there will no less than 4000 extra teachers in our primary schools, compared with 2002. Not only is the average class size in our primary schools down to 24, but there is now one teacher for 17 pupils at primary level, including resource teachers etc.

Children with special needs and those from disadvantaged areas are getting more support than ever before to help them to make the most of their time at school. With the thousands of extra primary teachers appointed, recent years have seen the largest expansion in teacher numbers since the expansion of free education. Over the next two school years even more teachers will be put in place both for the above priority areas of disadvantage and special education and also under a reduction in the mainstream staffing schedule at primary level. Primary schools are staffed on a general rule of at least one classroom teacher for every 29 children. Of course, schools with only one or two teachers have much lower staffing ratios than that — with two teachers for just 12 pupils in some cases and so on — but the general rule is that there is at least one classroom teacher for every 29 children in the school. Next year this is being reduced to 28 children per classroom teacher and in 2007/2008 it will be reduced to 27 children per classroom teacher.

The number of children in large classes has been reduced dramatically by this Government. Furthermore, what really puts the decrease in large classes in context is the fact that in 1996/97 five times more children were in classes of 35+ and ten times more children were in classes of 40+. It is important to appreciate that there are a number of different reasons why a particular school may have a large class in a given year. Reasons why there are large classes include a significant fluctuation in enrolments from one year to the next and/or a decision by the school principal not to have multi-grade classes.

Regardless of the reason why there is a large class in a particular school one year, it should be noted that in the majority of cases this is not the situation in the following year. In the main, the same schools do not have large classes year after year and so the same children are not in large classes year after year.

Where some classes in a school have class sizes of greater than 29, it is often because a decision has been taken at local level to use their teaching resources to have smaller numbers in other classes. Indeed, when the matter of why a particular school has a class of 35 in a particular grade is looked into, very often the answer is because there is another class in the same school with a much lower than average number of pupils in it.

Splitting classes may not always be an option for a particular school, because for example there might be a large group in junior infants and a small group in sixth class and so on. But where it is possible, principals should consider the benefits of having smaller multi-grade classes as against having large differences in class sizes at different levels in the school. This Government has clearly demonstrated its commitment to improving staffing in our primary schools by hiring thousands of extra teachers in recent years and we will continue to make progress on this issue.

Special Educational Needs.

Catherine Murphy

Ceist:

379 Ms C. Murphy asked the Minister for Education and Science her views on dyslexia workshops; if she will award grant aid to such initiatives; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22588/06]

Catherine Murphy

Ceist:

380 Ms C. Murphy asked the Minister for Education and Science the categories of specific or special learning needs required to have an individual learning plan; if it is intended to expend these categories; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22589/06]

Emmet Stagg

Ceist:

405 Mr. Stagg asked the Minister for Education and Science if her attention has been drawn to the workshops organised by an association (details supplied) in many areas; if her attention has further been drawn to the fact that the need for such workshops arises from the widespread non implementation of her Department’s policy and guidelines for slow learners; if her attention has further been drawn to the fact that the staff and other resources required by the workshops are fully funded by the parents of the pupils concerned; her views on grant aid to workshops to defray these costs; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22722/06]

Emmet Stagg

Ceist:

407 Mr. Stagg asked the Minister for Education and Science if she has satisfied herself regarding the take up and implementation of the individual learning programme for slow learners and for dyslexic pupils in particular at national school level; the percentage of national schools that have implemented this programme; her views on making the programme obligatory rather than optional; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22724/06]

Catherine Murphy

Ceist:

408 Ms C. Murphy asked the Minister for Education and Science if she has satisfied herself with the level of use of individual learning plans for children in need of special educational supports; if she will alter the manner in which such plans are incorporated into the education system by moving away from merely recommending their use and towards a situation where schools are required to implement them; if her Department has monitored in the past, currently monitors, or intends to monitor the learning outcomes achieved for pupils in schools which implement ILPs as compared with schools which do not; her views on the merits of individual learning plans; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22795/06]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 379, 380, 405, 407 and 408 together.

The Deputies will be aware of the significant initiative for allocating resource teachers that I introduced in primary schools in September 2005. The new scheme allocates resource teachers to schools to cater for the needs of children with high-incidence special educational needs, such as dyslexia and those children with low attainments. This ensures that schools have the resources in place to cater for pupils with high-incidence special educational needs who may enrol in their school.

The Learning-Support Guidelines 2000 advise schools to devise and implement an Individual Profile and Learning Programme in respect of all pupils with low achievement in literacy and numeracy. The Learning Support Guidelines are provided to schools as best practice guidance. While the process is not mandatory, schools are strongly advised to put procedures in place that ensure that the child's needs are identified and appropriate interventions are put in place.

I do not intend to make the Individual Profile and Learning Programme process mandatory. Rather, since their publication, my Department has provided and continues to provide support to schools and teachers on the implementation of the Learning-Support Guidelines. A copy of the Learning-Support Guidelines has been distributed to all primary teachers. Trainers from the Primary Curriculum Support Programme have provided a training day on the implementation of the Learning-Support Guidelines for the teachers in every primary school in the country and additional training courses and advice and support has been provided for school principals, learning support teachers and resource teachers. This support is on-going. The Learning-Support Guidelines are also used as the core textbook in the year-long training programmes for learning-support teachers that are provided by the Colleges of Education and the universities and which are funded by the Teacher Education Section of my Department.

As provided for in the Education for Persons with Special Educational Needs (EPSEN) Act (2004), an education plan for each individual pupil with special educational needs will become mandatory when the relevant sections of the EPSEN Act are commenced. In preparation for this, the National Council for Special Education (NCSE) has drawn up guidelines on the Individual Education Plan Process. It is intended to publish these guidelines before the end of the current school year. These guidelines will provide advice and assistance to schools, teachers and parents on devising and implementing Individual Education Plans (IEPs). It is expected that schools will use these guidelines to draw up school policies and procedures in relation to IEPs in advance of the mandatory requirement for them.

I have asked the NCSE to provide me with an implementation plan in relation to the EPSEN Act. I expect to receive this plan by October 2006. This plan will enable me to decide on the commencement of the remaining sections of the Act, including the sections related to IEPs. In relation to the matter of dyslexia workshops, I can confirm that my Department provides funding to the Dyslexia Association. This funding helps the organisation operate an information service for members and the public. In addition, part of the funding assists in meeting the costs associated with the attendance of some children from disadvantaged backgrounds at workshops and programmes organised by the association.

The Deputies may be aware that my Department has developed an information resource pack on dyslexia in cd-rom, dvd and video format, in association with the Department of Education in Northern Ireland. This product has been made available to all primary and post-primary schools. The DVD and video provides support for parents of pupils with dyslexia while the CD-Rom assists teachers who are teaching children with dyslexia in the mainstream classroom. Major improvements have been made in primary school staffing in recent years. Next September there will no less than 4000 extra teachers in our primary schools, compared with 2002. Not only is the average class size in our primary schools down to 24, but there is now one teacher for 17 pupils at primary level, including resource teachers etc.

Children with special needs and those from disadvantaged areas are getting more support than ever before to help them to make the most of their time at school. With the thousands of extra primary teachers appointed, recent years have seen the largest expansion in teacher numbers since the expansion of free education. Over the next two school years even more teachers will be put in place both for the above priority areas of disadvantage and special education and also under a reduction in the mainstream staffing schedule at primary level. Primary schools are staffed on a general rule of at least one classroom teacher for every 29 children. Of course, schools with only one or two teachers have much lower staffing ratios than that — with two teachers for just 12 pupils in some cases and so on — but the general rule is that there is at least one classroom teacher for every 29 children in the school. Next year this is being reduced to 28 children per classroom teacher and in 2007/2008 it will be reduced to 27 children per classroom teacher.

The number of children in large classes has been reduced dramatically by this Government. Furthermore, what really puts the decrease in large classes in context is the fact that in 1996/97 five times more children were in classes of 35+ and ten times more children were in classes of 40+. It is important to appreciate that there are a number of different reasons why a particular school may have a large class in a given year. Reasons why there are large classes include a significant fluctuation in enrolments from one year to the next and/or a decision by the school principal not to have multi-grade classes.

Regardless of the reason why there is a large class in a particular school one year, it should be noted that in the majority of cases this is not the situation in the following year. In the main, the same schools do not have large classes year after year and so the same children are not in large classes year after year.

Where some classes in a school have class sizes of greater than 29, it is often because a decision has been taken at local level to use their teaching resources to have smaller numbers in other classes. Indeed, when the matter of why a particular school has a class of 35 in a particular grade is looked into, very often the answer is because there is another class in the same school with a much lower than average number of pupils in it.

Splitting classes may not always be an option for a particular school, because for example there might be a large group in junior infants and a small group in sixth class and so on. But where it is possible, principals should consider the benefits of having smaller multi-grade classes as against having large differences in class sizes at different levels in the school. This Government has clearly demonstrated its commitment to improving staffing in our primary schools by hiring thousands of extra teachers in recent years and we will continue to make progress on this issue.

Catherine Murphy

Ceist:

381 Ms C. Murphy asked the Minister for Education and Science the recommended case load for resource teachers; if it is intended to set minimum standards for such teachers; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22590/06]

Primary school pupils with special educational needs are allocated between 3 and 5 support teaching hours per week. Once a school or cluster of schools acquires 22 additional resource teaching hours, a full-time resource teacher may be recruited. A full-time resource teacher is expected to teach for up to 25 hours per week. On this basis resource teachers would typically have between 5 and 8 pupils with low-incidence special educational needs on a caseload.

In post-primary schools SENOs allocate hours in respect of students with certain professionally assessed high- and low-incidence disabilities. The allocations range from 2.5 to 5 hours per child. A full-time resource teacher at post-primary level would have a caseload of 22 hours, however a teacher in such a setting may also teach other subjects and in theory could have just one student for resource teaching support.

The following teachers can be appointed to resource teacher posts: (i) Fully recognised and probated primary teachers; or (ii) Teachers who were granted provisional or restricted recognition from the Department of Education and Science before 28th March 2006. (iii) Teachers who are registered with the Teaching Council on or after 28th March 2006, and who are eligible to teach in mainstream or special education settings.

To be qualified as a resource teacher in the post-primary sector, a person must be qualified as a post-primary teacher and, in addition, hold a recognised post-graduate qualification in special educational needs (SEN)teaching. There is also provision for appointment of a teacher without such a post-graduate qualification if no fully qualified SEN teacher is available.

Major improvements have been made in primary school staffing in recent years. Next September there will no less than 4000 extra teachers in our primary schools, compared with 2002. Not only is the average class size in our primary schools down to 24, but there is now one teacher for 17 pupils at primary level, including resource teachers etc.

Children with special needs and those from disadvantaged areas are getting more support than ever before to help them to make the most of their time at school. With the thousands of extra primary teachers appointed, recent years have seen the largest expansion in teacher numbers since the expansion of free education. Over the next two school years even more teachers will be put in place both for the above priority areas of disadvantage and special education and also under a reduction in the mainstream staffing schedule at primary level. Primary schools are staffed on a general rule of at least one classroom teacher for every 29 children. Of course, schools with only one or two teachers have much lower staffing ratios than that — with two teachers for just 12 pupils in some cases and so on — but the general rule is that there is at least one classroom teacher for every 29 children in the school. Next year this is being reduced to 28 children per classroom teacher and in 2007/2008 it will be reduced to 27 children per classroom teacher.

The number of children in large classes has been reduced dramatically by this Government. Furthermore, what really puts the decrease in large classes in context is the fact that in 1996/97 five times more children were in classes of 35+ and ten times more children were in classes of 40+. It is important to appreciate that there are a number of different reasons why a particular school may have a large class in a given year. Reasons why there are large classes include a significant fluctuation in enrolments from one year to the next and/or a decision by the school principal not to have multi-grade classes.

Regardless of the reason why there is a large class in a particular school one year, it should be noted that in the majority of cases this is not the situation in the following year. In the main, the same schools do not have large classes year after year and so the same children are not in large classes year after year.

Where some classes in a school have class sizes of greater than 29, it is often because a decision has been taken at local level to use their teaching resources to have smaller numbers in other classes. Indeed, when the matter of why a particular school has a class of 35 in a particular grade is looked into, very often the answer is because there is another class in the same school with a much lower than average number of pupils in it.

Splitting classes may not always be an option for a particular school, because for example there might be a large group in junior infants and a small group in sixth class and so on. But where it is possible, principals should consider the benefits of having smaller multi-grade classes as against having large differences in class sizes at different levels in the school. This Government has clearly demonstrated its commitment to improving staffing in our primary schools by hiring thousands of extra teachers in recent years and we will continue to make progress on this issue.

Schools Amalgamation.

John McGuinness

Ceist:

382 Mr. McGuinness asked the Minister for Education and Science if she will sanction the amalgamation of two schools (details supplied) in County Kilkenny, in view of the fact that there is full agreement at local level; if the amalgamation will be approved in order that the administrative process can be completed while waiting on the technical reports on the sites; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22616/06]

The next step in the proposed amalgamation of the two schools, to which the Deputy refers, is for a technical assessment to be carried out on existing buildings to determine which, if any, would be suitable to act as a host for the new school.

The Deputy will be aware that on 13 January last, I outlined details of 62 schools which are being given the go ahead to proceed with major capital works such as new school building projects, extensions or refurbishment. The first key step for these schools is the appointment of the design team that will design and plan the works. Technical visits are currently being carried out on these projects as part of this process.

As soon as that series of technical visits is completed, officials in my Department will be in a position to proceed with other technical assessments such as the case of the two school sites referred to by the Deputy. My Department will be in direct contact with the school authorities in question when it is in a position to schedule a technical inspection of the buildings concerned.

Education Schemes.

Olwyn Enright

Ceist:

383 Ms Enright asked the Minister for Education and Science the reason her Department does not provide funding to a community-based organisation (details supplied) in County Laois, in view of the fact that the bulk of its work centres around supporting and encouraging children to continue in mainstream education; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22633/06]

Olwyn Enright

Ceist:

384 Ms Enright asked the Minister for Education and Science if she will examine an innovative educational scheme (details supplied) in County Laois with a view to making it a pilot project to assist in primary education here; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22634/06]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 383 and 384 together.

Tackling educational disadvantage is one of my main priorities and the new plan for educational inclusion, DEIS ( Delivering Equality of Opportunities in Schools) aims to ensure that the educational needs of children and young people, from pre-school to completion of upper second-level education (3 to 18 years), from disadvantaged communities are prioritised and effectively addressed. The plan is designed to ensure that schools serving the most disadvantaged communities benefit from the maximum level of support available.

Over the years, no less than 8 separate schemes for disadvantaged primary schools have been put in place. Some schools were benefiting from just one or two of these and others were benefiting from more. The new School Support Programme which is currently being rolled out in 840 schools selected to participate, will rationalise existing schemes and integrate them into the new School Support Programme, which is designed to ensure that the most disadvantaged schools benefit from a comprehensive package of supports, while ensuring that others continue to get support in line with the level of disadvantage among their pupils.

A key objective of this action plan is to enhance integration and partnership working, both within the education sector itself and between all other relevant Government departments, agencies, organisations and groups. Under DEIS, my Department, through the network of ten regional offices is enhancing its capacity to work in partnership with locally based agencies and individuals promoting social inclusion measures.

Measures under DEIS range from pre-school interventions, supports for tackling children's literacy problems, reduced pupil teacher ratios, increased capitation grants, measures to tackle early school leaving and strengthen ties between the school, the family and the community. A key component of my Department's strategy to discriminate positively in favour of children and young people who are at risk of early school leaving is the School Completion Programme. This programme was implemented to directly target those in danger of dropping out of the education system and in line with current thinking favours an integrated cross-community and cross-sectoral approach based on the development of local strategies to ensure maximum participation levels in the education process. It entails targeting individual young people aged 4 — 18, both in and out of school, and arranging supports to address inequalities in education access, participation and outcomes.

Increased access will be provide to the 200 second level and 320 urban/town primary schools in SSP to a range of academic and non-academic supports based in-school, after school, out-of-school and during holiday time, based on best practices identified through the School Completion Programme (SCP). There are currently 82 School Completion Programme project sites located around the country and with the roll out of the new School Support Programme the number of project sites will be increased. In this context, I am not in favour of introducing new individual pilot schemes at this stage.

Schools Building Projects.

Joan Burton

Ceist:

385 Ms Burton asked the Minister for Education and Science further to her recent announcement of a new primary school in Dublin 15 for September 2006 under the patronage of the Catholic Archdiocese of Dublin, and a new school under the patronage of Educate Together, the location of each site; the size of each site; the cost of acquiring each site; the number of pupils who will be catered for by each school; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22635/06]

In April this year I took a decision to grant recognition to a new primary school for the Dublin 15 area, with effect from this coming September under the Patronage of the Catholic Archdiocese of Dublin. The rate and pace of development in this area is unprecedented and this decision was taken to ensure that we have sufficient educational infrastructure in place to cater for the ever increasing number of pupils seeking school places. It is planned that this school, St. Benedict's, Ongar, will be located in temporary accommodation on the Mary Mother of Hope NS site.

With regard to permanent accommodation, it is intended that both the new Catholic School, St. Benedict's and Castaheaney Educate Together National School will be accommodated on the reserved school site at Ongar. The acquisition process for this site is currently being finalised. In order to protect the public procurement process it is normal policy not to comment on the purchase price of individual sites.

A sixteen classroom school will be constructed initially on this site with a target completion date of September, 2007 to meet the immediate accommodation needs of Castaheaney Educate Together National School. However, the ultimate long term enrolment of both schools concerned will be the subject of further discussions with the school management authorities concerned.

Pat Breen

Ceist:

386 Mr. P. Breen asked the Minister for Education and Science if extra funding will be made available to a school (details supplied) in County Clare in order to complete a building project; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22642/06]

As part of the expansion of the devolved scheme for primary school building works, a grant of €275,000 was sanctioned in March 2006 to enable the management authorities of the school in question to extend and refurbish their school. Devolving funding to school management authorities allows them to have control of their projects, assists in moving projects more quickly to tender and construction and can also deliver better value for money.

The Schemes are not structured on the basis that the Department funding must be supplemented by local fundraising. They do however allow a school to supplement the funding from local resources if they so wish. The critical element is that with devolved authority the school must set the scope of works to match the funding allocated. The Department does not define the precise works to be carried out. A school can make choices within the budget allocated.

Setting the scope of works is the critical first step. Clearly where a school has a known level of resources apart from the Department funding or knows its capacity to raise additional resources it is open to that school to extend the scope of works to include additional facilities. However if the scope of works is not set appropriately from the outset based on the budget available there is a risk that the school will be faced with a funding gap when the project is at construction.

The choices to be made within these devolved schemes rest with the school and that is the cornerstone of any policy of devolution. The school authority knows the budget and must decide what it is capable of building with that budget. The time to identify a problem is at the outset before entering any contract.

Schools can raise with my Department any site specific problems or unusual planning stipulations that impose additional costs and these will be examined.

Otherwise schools must reduce the scope of intended works so as to remain within budget.

A school does not have to accept the invitation to participate in a devolved scheme and instead be considered for inclusion in the mainstream school building programme in line with the project's priority band rating. The school in question recently submitted an appeal for additional funding which will be considered as soon as possible. The school management will be notified of the decision at an early date.

School Accommodation.

Tom Hayes

Ceist:

387 Mr. Hayes asked the Minister for Education and Science when work will begin on providing additional accommodation to a school (details supplied) in County Tipperary. [22643/06]

The School Planning Section of my Department is in receipt of an application for major capital works from the management authority of the school to which the Deputy refers. The application has been assessed in accordance with the published prioritisation criteria for large scale projects and was assigned a Band 2 rating. Progress on the proposed works is being considered in the context of the School Building and Modernisation Programme from 2006 onwards.

School Services Staff.

Seán Haughey

Ceist:

388 Mr. Haughey asked the Minister for Education and Science the reason some primary school secretaries are paid indirectly by way of an ancillary grant to the school per child, while other school secretaries are paid directly by her Department; if those paid by way of an ancillary grant are at a disadvantage in view of the fact that PRSI has to be paid by the school first and that pupil numbers in a school can fall; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22650/06]

My Department provides funding towards the cost of secretarial services in primary schools under two separate schemes. One is the 1978 scheme under which my Department meets the full cost of salary. These secretaries are paid directly through my Department's payroll. The 1978 scheme is being phased out and no new posts are being created under the scheme. The new Ancillary Services Grant scheme has superseded the 1978 scheme.

The new Ancillary Services grant scheme is a more extensive scheme covering the funding of ancillary services in primary schools, including secretarial services. The scheme is flexible in nature giving Boards of Management and schools discretion as to the manner in which secretarial services are provided.

Under the new scheme the arrangement is that each school receives a grant from my Department for the provision of secretarial and other ancillary services. It is a matter for each school to determine how best to meet its secretarial requirements. My Department has no direct role in the pay and conditions of service of secretaries employed directly by schools under these arrangements.

Third Level Fees.

John Perry

Ceist:

389 Mr. Perry asked the Minister for Education and Science the reason a person (details supplied) in County Sligo has to pay fees for their studies as they are the holder of an Irish passport; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22653/06]

Under the terms of the Free Fees Initiative the Exchequer meets the tuition fees of students who are first-time undergraduates and hold EU nationality or official refugee status and have been ordinarily resident in an EU Member State for at least three of the five years preceding their entry to an approved third level course. It is a matter for each institution to determine students eligibility for free fees under my Department's Free Fees Initiative.

I would emphasise the distinction between the criteria that determines eligibility under the Free Fees Initiative, and the criteria by which individual institutions establish what rates of tuition fees should be charged, in cases where a student does not qualify for free fees. The universities are autonomous bodies and, as such, may determine the level of fees to be charged in cases where the Free Fees Initiative does not apply.

Psychological Service.

Enda Kenny

Ceist:

390 Mr. Kenny asked the Minister for Education and Science the number of psychologists available to primary schools in the Dublin area; the waiting times for psychological assessments; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22656/06]

All primary and post primary schools have access to psychological assessments either directly through my Department's National Educational Psychological Service (NEPS) or through the Scheme for Commissioning Psychological Assessments (SCPA) that is administered by NEPS and full details of which are available on my Department's website.

NEPS does not keep waiting lists for assessments of children but in common with other psychological services encourages a staged assessment process, whereby each school takes responsibility for initial assessment, educational planning and remedial intervention, in consultation with their assigned NEPS psychologist. Only if there is a failure to make reasonable progress in spite of the school's best efforts, will a child be referred for individual psychological assessment. This system allows the psychologists to give early attention to urgent cases and also to help many more children indirectly than could be seen individually.

Children who manifest very special or urgent needs in school and who have not been previously assessed by a psychologist and are brought to the attention of a NEPS psychologist by the Principal teacher will usually be assessed by the psychologist within that school term. Normally, principals of schools prioritise those children in need of psychological assessment in consultation with the assigned psychologist.

In the case of schools that do not currently have dedicated NEPS psychologists assigned to them, as I already mentioned, such schools have access to educational psychological assessments through the SCPA. Under this Scheme, schools can commission assessments from a member of the panel of private practitioners approved by NEPS, and NEPS will pay the fees directly to the psychologist concerned.

NEPS provides assistance to all schools and school communities that experience critical incidents, regardless of whether or not they have a NEPS psychologist assigned to them. NEPS also provides psychological services to schools in Dublin for children with visual impairment and for children with hearing impairment.

Since the establishment of the NEPS in 1999, the number of NEPS psychologists has increased from 43 to 122 at present. Thirty psychologists (30) are currently assigned to primary schools in Dublin. The Public Appointments Service has concluded a new recruitment competition for the appointment of Educational Psychologists to NEPS. Regional panels have been established to allow my Department give greater priority in filling vacancies to areas with the greatest need. Two newly appointed psychologists have been assigned to a Dublin region. My Department is currently in the process of recruiting a further 9 psychologists.

Special Educational Needs.

Enda Kenny

Ceist:

391 Mr. Kenny asked the Minister for Education and Science the way in which parents whose special needs children are attending pre-schools throughout Dublin are to access primary schools in view of the fact that most of these primary schools have waiting lists for children with special needs; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22657/06]

It is open to all parents to approach schools with a view to enrolling their children, including those with special educational needs. A specific function of the National Council for Special Education, through its network of local special educational needs organisers (SENOs), is to identify appropriate educational placements for all children with special educational needs. The SENO is a focal point of contact for parents/guardians and schools.

Contact with the relevant SENO can be made by contacting the NCSE, Mill Street, Trim, Co. Meath, telephone number (046) 948 6400 or by accessing the NCSE website at www.ncse.ie.

School Enrolments.

Enda Kenny

Ceist:

392 Mr. Kenny asked the Minister for Education and Science the number of children attending secondary school in the Rathcoole, County Dublin area in each of the years 2000 to 2006; the projected numbers for the next five years; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22658/06]

There is one postprimary school in Rathcoole, Holy Family Community School and enrolment details since 2000 are as follows:

2000

711

2001

689

2002

678

2003

662

2004

676

2005

661

Details regarding the projected pupils numbers for this school are not available in my Department. However, future needs in the area will be assessed in the light of an application from the Holy Family Community School for major capital works.

Enda Kenny

Ceist:

393 Mr. Kenny asked the Minister for Education and Science the number of children attending secondary school in the Clondalkin, Dublin 22 area in each of the years from 2000 to 2006; the projected numbers for the next five years; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22659/06]

There are four Post-Primary providers in the Clondalkin area namely, Coláiste Bríde, Moyle Park College, Collinstown Park Community College and Deansrath Community College. Details of enrolments at these schools since 2000 are as follows.

2000

2,747

2001

2,673

2002

2,568

2003

2,579

2004

2,538

2005

2,509

Figures for projected enrolments in Clondalkin are not held in my Department.

However I am satisfied that between them, the existing schools can cater for current and emerging needs.

Enda Kenny

Ceist:

394 Mr. Kenny asked the Minister for Education and Science the number of children attending secondary school in the Newcastle, in County Dublin area in each of the years from 2000 to 2006; the projected numbers for the next five years; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22660/06]

There is no Post-Primary provision in Newcastle. Students from this area attend secondary school in the neighbouring areas of Rathcoole, Lucan and Clondalkin.

Enda Kenny

Ceist:

395 Mr. Kenny asked the Minister for Education and Science the number of children attending secondary school in the Lucan area in County Dublin in each of the years from 2000 to 2006; the projected numbers for the next five years; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22661/06]

There are five Post-Primary providers serving students in Lucan, namely, Coláiste Phádraig, St. Joseph's College, St. Kevin's Community College, Cólaiste Cois Life and Lucan Community College. Details of enrolments since 2000 are as follows.

2000

2,736

2001

2,706

2002

2,738

2003

2,772

2004

2,718

2005

2,731

While details of projected numbers requiring places in Lucan over the next five years are not held in my Department I am satisfied that between them, the Post-Providers in the area can cater for current needs. However, given the level of population growth in Lucan in recent years, my Department will be assessing the actions necessary to cater for the long term needs at postprimary level in the general Lucan area.

Enda Kenny

Ceist:

396 Mr. Kenny asked the Minister for Education and Science the number of children attending national school in the Rathcoole, County Dublin area in each of the years from 2000 to 2006; the projected numbers for the next five years; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22662/06]

There are two primary schools serving the needs of children in Rathcoole, namely Holy Family National School and Scoil Chrónáin. The following is details of enrolments in the Rathcoole area since 2000.

2000

456

2001

479

2002

480

2003

492

2004

495

2005

512

Figures for projected numbers for the next five years are not available in my Department.

Enda Kenny

Ceist:

397 Mr. Kenny asked the Minister for Education and Science the number of children attending national school in the Newcastle, County Dublin area in each of the years from 2000 to 2006; the projected numbers for the next five years. [22663/06]

There is one primary school in Newcastle, namely Newcastle National School and enrolment details since 2000 are as follows:

2000

228

2001

237

2002

237

2003

224

2004

222

2005

224

My Department has determined that a 24 classroom primary school will be required in Newcastle to meet future needs in that area. Negotiations regarding the acquisition of a site are ongoing in this regard.

Enda Kenny

Ceist:

398 Mr. Kenny asked the Minister for Education and Science the number of children attending national school in the Clondalkin, Dublin 22 area in each of the years from 2000 to 2006; the projected numbers for the next five years; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22664/06]

There are eighteen primary schools serving the pupils of Clondalkin, namely, Our Lady Queen of Apostles National School, Gaelscoil na Camoige, St. Bernadette's Senior National School, Scoil Naomh Íde, St. Mary's Junior National School, Talbot Senior National School, St. Peter Apostle Senior National School, Scoil Naomh Áine, Scoil Naomh Seosamh, St. Bernadette's Junior National School, Scoil Naomh Eoin, Neillstown National School, Gaelscoil Chluain Dolcain, Scoil Nano Nagle, Sacred Heart National School, St. Ronan's National School, St. Mary's Senior National School and Scoil Mhuire. Enrolment details at these schools since 2000 are as follows.

2000

5,583

2001

5,517

2002

5,415

2003

5,427

2004

5,329

2005

5,340

Figures for future enrolments are not held in my Department, however, I am satisfied that the eighteen primary providers between them can cater for emerging needs in that area.

Enda Kenny

Ceist:

399 Mr. Kenny asked the Minister for Education and Science the number of children attending national school in the Lucan, County Dublin area in each of the years from 2000 to 2006; the projected numbers for the next five years; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22665/06]

There are twelve primary schools in Lucan serving the needs of that area, namely, Archbishop Ryan Junior National School, Archbishop Ryan Senior National School, Scoil Mhuire Esker National School, St. Thomas Junior National School, Scoil Áine Senior National School, St. Andrew's National School, Lucan Boys National School, Scoil Mhuire National School, Griffeen Valley Educate Together National School, Lucan Educate Together National School, Gaelscoil Naomh Pádraig and Gaelscoil Eiscir Riada. Enrolment details at these schools since 2000 are as follows:

2000

3,304

2001

3,472

2002

3,653

2003

4,109

2004

4,236

2005

4,536

These schools have a potential capacity of 5,736 pupils. Therefore, I am satisfied that, between them, the schools in Lucan can cater for current and future needs.

Enda Kenny

Ceist:

400 Mr. Kenny asked the Minister for Education and Science when building work will proceed on the new schools in Adamstown; the number of children they will cater for; the expected completion date; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22666/06]

The initial requirement in Adamstown is for two primary schools and one post-primary school. These schools will cater for about 900 primary pupils and 1,000 post-primary pupils. The immediate requirement is for the primary schools and I am pleased to advise the Deputy that my Department is liaising directly with the developers in Adamstown on the procurement of these schools under a design and build. I understand that the developers have recently applied for planning permission for these schools and it is intended that construction will commence later this year with a view to facilitating the first intake of pupils in September 2007.

Site Acquisitions.

Enda Kenny

Ceist:

401 Mr. Kenny asked the Minister for Education and Science if a site has been selected for a school (details supplied) in County Dublin; the negotiations which have taken place for same; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22667/06]

The Property Management Section of the Office of Public Works, which acts on behalf of my Department in relation to site acquisitions generally was requested to source a site for the school referred to by the Deputy. Site proposals have been received by OPW following their recent advertisement for possible site options. These site proposals will now need to be assessed.

Enda Kenny

Ceist:

402 Mr. Kenny asked the Minister for Education and Science the landbank available in Dublin for school sites in the future; her plans to cater for future schooling needs in Dublin; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22668/06]

With regard to rapidly developing areas in Dublin, my Department is maximising the use of existing school facilities by providing extensions where site capacity allows along with the provision of new schools on Greenfield sites. This year alone, I authorised six primary school extensions, one post primary extension and six new primary schools to enter architectural planning in Dublin. This level of development is planned to continue with site negotiations at advanced stages for other school projects.

There are two sites in the Dublin area in the ownership of my Department that have yet to be developed. One of these is at Kingswood Heights, Tallaght for a post primary school and the other site is in Rathcoole, Co. Dublin for a primary school. My Department is pursuing an ongoing programme of site acquisitions for school building purposes in many locations throughout the country including the Dublin area. Local Authorities are obliged by statute to refer draft local area development plans to my Department for observation and comment so that lands can be zoned for future education use. There are numerous such sites reserved for education purposes particularly in the rapidly developing areas around Dublin so as to ensure that there will be sufficient land set aside and available for the future development of education infrastructure.

School Enrolments.

Enda Kenny

Ceist:

403 Mr. Kenny asked the Minister for Education and Science the number of children on the waiting list for a school (details supplied) in County Dublin; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22669/06]

Information regarding waiting lists in individual schools are the responsibility of the management authorities of the school in question. While information has been previously submitted to my Department regarding enrolments at the school referred to by the deputy, the up to date position is not available in my Department.

School Staffing.

Olwyn Enright

Ceist:

404 Ms Enright asked the Minister for Education and Science the reason for the removal of a resource teacher from a school (details supplied) in Dublin 6; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22695/06]

This school currently has the services of three learning support/resource teachers. One of these posts is due to be suppressed because a number of pupils, who had been allocated individual resource teaching hours, are leaving the school. However, I am informed that the school has submitted applications for resource teaching support to the Special Educational Needs Organiser in respect of other pupils due to enrol in the school. The outcome of these applications will determine the level of resource teaching support in the school for the 2006/2007 school year.

Question No. 405 answered with QuestionNo. 379.

School Placement.

Bernard J. Durkan

Ceist:

406 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for Education and Science when primary school placements will be offered to persons (details supplied) in County Kildare; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22723/06]

The compulsory school starting age in a National School is 6 years of age and Rule 64 (1) of the Rules for National Schools provides that a child must be at least 4 years of age before she/he may be enrolled in a National School. Children of compulsory school-going age must have a place in a National School and overall there are more than enough places available.

Enrolment in individual schools is the responsibility of the managerial authority of those schools and my Department does not seek to intervene in decisions made by schools in such matters. My Department's main responsibility is to ensure that schools in an area can, between them, cater for all pupils seeking places. This may result, however, in some pupils not obtaining a place in the school of their first choice.

It is the responsibility of the managerial authorities of schools that are not in a position to admit all pupils seeking entry to implement an enrolment policy in accordance with the Education Act. In this regard a board of management may find it necessary to restrict enrolment to children from a particular area or a particular age group or, occasionally, on the basis of some other criterion.

Where a board of management refuses to enrol a student in a school the parent of the student or, where the student has reached 18 years of age, the student themselves, following the conclusion of any appeal procedures at school level, has a statutory entitlement under section 29 of the Education Act 1998 to appeal that decision to the Secretary General of the Department of Education and Science.

Under the appeal process, a committee is established to hear the appeal. Oral hearings are conducted with a minimum of formality. In most cases appeals must be dealt within 30 days. Where appropriate, the Secretary General may give whatever directions to the board of management that are considered necessary to remedy the matter complained of.

Questions Nos. 407 and 408 answered with Question No. 379.

Vocational Education Committees.

Paul Kehoe

Ceist:

409 Mr. Kehoe asked the Minister for Education and Science the plans she has to give a chairman’s allowance to the chairperson of the different county vocational education committees; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [22796/06]

My Department has been in discussions with the Irish Vocational Education Association (IVEA) in relation to their request for the introduction of an allowance for the Chairpersons of VECs. This matter is under consideration within my Department and a response will be furnished to the IVEA in due course.

Ministerial Responsibilities.

Paul McGrath

Ceist:

410 Mr. P. McGrath asked the Minister for Education and Science the functions which have, since the last general election, been delegated to Ministers of State at her Department by the Government under powers conferred on it by Section 2 (1) of the Ministers and Secretaries (Amendment) (No. 2) Act 1977; and the statutory instrument number of each such order. [22841/06]

There are two Delegation of Functions Orders currently in force in my Department. Under the Education and Science (Delegation of Ministerial Functions) (No. 2) Order 2004 (SI No. 521 of 2005), the Government delegated to Mr Brian Lenihan TD, Minister of State at the Department of Education and Science, the powers and duties of the Minister for Education and Science conferred on her by or under the Children Acts 1908 to 1989, the Children Act 2001 and the Education (Welfare) Act 2000. The delegation does not include powers and duties that require the Minister to give her agreement to the exercise of any power or performance of any duty by another Minister.

Under the Education and Science (Delegation of Ministerial Functions) (No. 3) Order 2004 (SI No. 522 of 2005) the Government delegated to Ms Síle de Valera TD, Minister of State at the Department of Education and Science, the power and duties of the Minister for Education and Science conferred on the Minister by or under the Youth Work Act 2001; section 7(1)(c)(i) of the Education Act 1998, insofar as it relates to adult education, including educational disadvantage, among adults; and section 7(1)(c)(ii) of the Education Act 1998 insofar as it relates to transport services. Both of these orders were made on 7 December 2004.

Prior to these, there have been a number of Delegation Orders made since the convention of the current Dáil. These are the Education and Science (Delegation of Ministerial Functions) (No. 1) Order 2002 (S.I. No. 653 of 2002); the Education and Science (Delegation of Ministerial Functions) (No. 2) Order 2002 (S.I. No. 654 of 2002); the Education and Science (Delegation of Ministerial Functions) Order 2003 (S.I. No. 526 of 2003); and the Education and Science (Delegation of Ministerial Functions) (No. 2) Order 2003 (S.I. No. 738 of 2003).

Army Compensation Claims.

Joan Burton

Ceist:

411 Ms Burton asked the Minister for Defence further to Parliamentary Question Nos. 67, 121 and 126 of 9 May 2006, the number, of those who were awarded gratuities, who were officers; the number who were not; the rate of gratuity paid to each; the number of those, in respect of the Section 12(2) double compensation of the 59 cases received, who were officers; the number who were not; and the amount by which awards are reduced in cases where partial reduction applies. [22391/06]

Joan Burton

Ceist:

412 Ms Burton asked the Minister for Defence further to Parliamentary Question Nos. 67, 121 and 126 of 9 May 2006, the status of the remaining two cases in view of the fact that there were 59 cases eligible for review under Section 13(2) of which 48 cases were decided and nine not; the number of those awarded pensions who were officers and the number who were not; the number of those awarded gratuities who were officers and the number who were not; the rate of pension awarded to those who were officers; and rate of pension awarded to those who were not. [22392/06]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 411 and 412 together.

The information requested is being compiled and will be forwarded to the Deputy as soon as possible.

Ministerial Responsibilities.

Paul McGrath

Ceist:

413 Mr. P. McGrath asked the Minister for Defence the functions which have, since the last general election, been delegated to Ministers of State at his Department by the Government under powers conferred on it by Section 2 (1) of the Ministers and Secretaries (Amendment) (No. 2) Act 1977; and the statutory instrument number of each such order. [22842/06]

Since the last general election, no specific function has been delegated to the Minister of State at my Department, Mr. Tom Kitt, T.D., who is also Minister of State at the Department of the Taoiseach. I do, however, request his assistance in the execution of certain duties, on an ongoing basis. Minister Kitt has deputised for me at official events on a number of occasions when I have been unable to attend due to prior diary commitments.

Social and Affordable Housing.

Jerry Cowley

Ceist:

414 Dr. Cowley asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if he will ensure that under the State lands initiative, local authorities should give some of their land to provide lands in the context of the affordable housing initiative; his views on whether community zoning could be a simple system if it is prioritised by the Government and as stated to this Deputy that this could be a simple operation; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22307/06]

Under the terms of the Sustaining Progress Affordable Housing Initiative, a series of lands belonging to local authorities have been released to the initiative. To date, 131 affordable housing units have been provided on three sites in Buckley's Field, Blackrock, Cork (32 units), Finglas Road (50 units) and Flemington, Balbriggan (49 units). Construction is also underway on ten sites belonging to local authorities which will yield a total of 574 affordable housing units.

In addition to these specific projects, local authorities are also progressing numerous projects on their own lands under their social and other affordable housing programmes. The zoning of land for particular purposes is a function of local authorities within the development plan process, as set out in the Planning and Development Act 2000. My Department actively engages with local authorities on a range of initiatives towards community improvements. Local authorities will generally have regard to potential financial implications of zoning exclusively for community use, and may prefer to adopt an integrated approach to the planning requirements of an area in consultation with the relevant stakeholders.

To assist local authorities in this process, I recently published Draft Guidelines on Development Plans for Planning Authorities for public consultation which set out, inter alia, the need for development plans to include objectives for the integration of the planning and sustainable development of the area with the social, cultural and community requirements of the area and its population. The closing date for comments and submissions on the Draft Guidelines is 21 July 2006.

Noise Pollution.

Finian McGrath

Ceist:

415 Mr. F. McGrath asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the action a person can take regarding the noise pollution from jet skis that are operating off the prom in Clontarf as they are disturbing children at 9.30 pm; and if he will advise on this matter. [22638/06]

Under the Environmental Protection Agency Act 1992 (Noise) Regulations 1994, a local authority or any person may seek an order in the District Court to have noise giving reasonable cause for annoyance abated. The procedures involved have been simplified to allow action to be taken without legal representation. A public information leaflet outlining the legal options available to persons experiencing noise nuisance is available from my Department and on the Department's website, www.environ.ie.

The Maritime Safety Act 2005 includes provisions on the regulation and control of watercraft in the interests of safety and the prevention of nuisance or injury to persons. It is open to any person who feels that noise from a watercraft is causing a serious nuisance to raise the matter with the local authority or harbour authority concerned for consideration having regard to the provisions of the 2005 Act.

Company Closures.

David Stanton

Ceist:

416 Mr. Stanton asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government further to Parliamentary Question No. 298 of 29 January 2003 if the property that was held by a company (details supplied) on Haulbowline Island under a lease dated 22 May 1996 and made between the Minister for Finance, the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources and the company has been disclaimed through the courts following the voluntary liquidation of a company; the situation regarding the ownership or control of this property; the size of the property; his future plans for the property; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22726/06]

The case in question was one in which the liquidator of the company initiated proceedings to disclaim the lease, granted by the State through the Departments of Finance, and Communications, Marine and Natural Resources on a site of total area in the region of 20 hectares at Haulbowline, Cobh, County Cork, under Section 290 of the Companies Acts, on the basis that the lease constituted "onerous property".

Ultimately, the lease of the site was not disclaimed through the courts as the liquidator in the intervening period exercised a break clause in the lease. Notwithstanding the exercise of this break clause, the liquidator was constrained to remain on site until June 2003 in order to secure the proper removal from the site of certain licensed radioactive materials then held on site. On completion of this, the site reverted to State custody.

My Department was mandated by Government, inter alia, to secure and maintain the site, and to procure and have carried out an appropriate site investigation. The reports on the site investigation will help inform Government on the potential future uses of the site, and I will be reporting their conclusions to Government in the relatively near future. Pending finalisation of the reports, and the subsequent deliberations of Government, it would not be appropriate to offer views about the future of the site.

Question No. 417 answered with QuestionNo. 140.

Register of Electors.

Ivor Callely

Ceist:

418 Mr. Callely asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government when the register of electors based on the revised Dáil Éireann constituencies will be available; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22317/06]

The Electoral (Amendment) Act 2005 implemented the Constituency Commission's 2004 recommendations in relation to Dáil constituencies. The revised constituencies will come into force on the dissolution of the Dáil and will be effective for the next general election; in the period up to the dissolution of the Dáil, the existing constituencies apply for any bye-elections which may be held.

The compilation and maintenance of the register of electors is a matter for each local registration authority. In July 2005 my Department wrote to local authorities requesting that the current register of electors should be adapted so that both the existing and the revised constituencies could be identified from it. All local authorities have confirmed that the appropriate adaptations have been made and that copies of the register for the revised constituencies are available on request.

Departmental Statistics.

Ivor Callely

Ceist:

419 Mr. Callely asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the statistics available on the amount of moneys paid to local authorities by way of development levy and charges for each year from 2000 to 2005; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22318/06]

The following table, which is based on information supplied by planning authorities, sets out the development contributions collected by local authorities for the period 2000-2004 and an estimate of development contributions collected in 2005.

County Area

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

Estimate 2005

Carlow

866,523

721,492

527,526

4,108,871

5,423,712

4,979,226

Cavan

980,322

985,723

1,250,997

1,726,563

2,443,668

2,905,970

Clare

1,337,849

1,342,238

1,848,373

5,030,619

15,012,318

8,639,087

Cork

10,101,535

9,803,819

13,650,879

18,640,420

23,372,801

38,739,433

Donegal

2,003,808

3,011,577

2,886,599

4,077,770

5,408,421

5,420,650

Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown

5,978,273

6,067,832

7,761,776

8,248,405

12,005,514

23,000,000

Fingal

13,612,512

14,764,631

16,338,872

22,828,194

36,418,076

50,780,348

Galway

2,854,367

3,688,593

3,472,987

6,283,355

10,192,308

12,653,760

Kerry

1,659,269

1,902,843

3,540,009

4,142,871

8,414,791

12,105,223

Kildare

6,428,684

6,078,742

9,249,082

9,681,082

21,553,713

20,220,462

Kilkenny

952,403

2,949,594

3,242,523

3,990,300

8,104,213

13,541,275

Laois

1,732,248

1,511,250

2,531,622

4,058,654

4,846,814

12,907,000

Leitrim

643,846

427,771

763,472

1,904,028

2,177,356

4,200,000

Limerick

1,632,093

2,277,417

2,896,451

3,246,640

5,102,569

12,675,000

Longford

670,007

866,501

1,438,301

1,306,556

2,840,998

3,574,312

Louth

4,270,854

5,174,232

8,993,794

11,621,455

13,576,797

28,110,342

Mayo

1,933,749

1,301,687

786,940

1,266,487

4,156,144

19,043,049

Meath

6,028,641

12,861,534

9,506,636

21,223,966

23,739,581

40,130,188

Monaghan

28,760

1,039,145

1,021,967

1,187,936

1,684,053

8,725,905

Offaly

1,411,426

983,783

1,194,923

2,440,985

5,077,802

5,197,593

Roscommon

1,173,977

798,832

1,958,157

3,449,130

3,679,966

6,389,417

Sligo

543,721

1,286,519

2,416,388

2,527,829

2,669,171

4,479,110

South Dublin

10,901,971

10,704,857

11,243,420

2,397,997

20,759,303

31,566,815

Tipperary North

643,639

1,092,348

1,014,080

15,249,361

5,227,791

6,913,274

Tipperary South

1,346,764

1,204,065

2,003,725

3,751,818

5,342,596

5,227,000

Waterford

2,018,992

1,659,281

1,596,213

1,663,166

3,519,316

5,044,301

Westmeath

1,942,817

2,067,964

1,819,521

3,793,639

5,274,025

8,338,049

Wexford

4,517,653

5,096,974

6,507,272

8,043,630

11,591,327

32,124,511

Wicklow

3,095,140

5,236,242

7,929,194

8,951,778

11,541,145

33,380,176

Sub Total

91,311,843

106,907,486

129,391,699

186,843,506

281,156,288

461,011,476

City Council

Cork City

1,924,379

1,820,076

3,094,378

7,521,882

10,831,391

11,043,400

Dublin City

10,563,548

7,606,758

8,654,092

11,378,014

27,571,393

58,403,217

Galway City

3,523,296

3,815,743

5,142,663

5,795,645

7,358,804

5,400,000

Limerick City

1,255,951

1,214,372

2,493,006

2,521,556

4,592,920

7,687,886

Waterford City

1,801,140

611,577

2,219,625

1,388,454

5,807,685

6,450,605

Sub Total

19,068,315

15,068,526

21,603,764

28,605,551

56,162,193

88,985,108

Total

110,380,157

121,976,012

150,995,463

215,449,057

337,318,481

549,996,584

Question No. 420 answered with QuestionNo. 61.

Land Acquisition.

Paul Connaughton

Ceist:

421 Mr. Connaughton asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the position of an application for sale of a bog by a person (details supplied) in County Galway; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22327/06]

I understand that an offer to purchase will shortly issue from my Department in this case.

Local Authority Housing.

Arthur Morgan

Ceist:

422 Mr. Morgan asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if his Department has at any stage issued a circular to local authorities regarding the conditions and standards which social housing which the local authority is re-allocating must meet; and if he will make available any such circular which has been issued in the past ten years. [22334/06]

Circulars HRT 8/93 (15 June 1993) and HRT 2/97 (14 April 1997) advised local authorities of their obligations under the Housing (Standards for Rented Houses) Regulations 1993 which detail standards for rented houses including local authority houses. Copies of these circulars are available from my Department.

Fergus O'Dowd

Ceist:

423 Mr. O’Dowd asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the progress to date on the application by a group (details supplied) in County Louth for capital funding for a women’s refuge in Drogheda to his Department under the capital assistance scheme and the National Lottery fund; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22368/06]

An application for funding under the voluntary housing capital assistance scheme has been received from Drogheda Borough Council in respect of this project and clarification on a number of aspects sought from the Council is awaited. When this is to hand the application will be further considered. Officials from my Department will, if required, meet with the Council and the voluntary body to discuss ways in which the project may be progressed.

John Deasy

Ceist:

424 Mr. Deasy asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the number of social and affordable houses that have been funded by his Department and completed in Waterford city and Waterford county in each of the past five years. [22369/06]

Details of the number of social and affordable houses that have been provided in Waterford City and county in each of the past five years are set out in my Department's Housing Statistics Bulletins, copies of which are available in the Oireachtas Library and on the Department's website at www.environ.ie. The majority of these have been funded through either Exchequer capital provision or non-voted expenditure in the form of loans from the Housing Finance Agency.

Fire Stations.

John Deasy

Ceist:

425 Mr. Deasy asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if he will allocate funding for the construction of a new fire station at Kilmacthomas, County Waterford. [22370/06]

My Department has received no formal plans from Waterford County Council in respect of the provision of a new fire station at Kilmacthomas.

Local Authority Housing.

John Perry

Ceist:

426 Mr. Perry asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the directive he has issued on the draft framework plan for a project (details supplied) in County Sligo; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22398/06]

My Department met with officials from Sligo Borough Council on 7 June 2006 to discuss the draft framework plan for the regeneration of this estate. The overall proposals are now being examined in my Department in relation to their scope and suitability as well as indicative costings and implementation. A response from the Department will be conveyed to the Borough Council as soon as possible.

Paul Kehoe

Ceist:

427 Mr. Kehoe asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government when a decision will be made on the location of the count for the next general election for the Carlow-Kilkenny constituency; the person who makes this decision; and if the count could be held in County Carlow at the next general election as it has been held in County Kilkenny for the last number of general elections. [22407/06]

Under electoral law, the returning officer for the Dáil constituency concerned (in the case of Carlow-Kilkenny, the Kilkenny County Registrar) is responsible for all matters in connection with the conduct of the election, including the selection of a place to be used as a count centre.

Arthur Morgan

Ceist:

428 Mr. Morgan asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the outcome of the meeting which he indicated, in reply to Parliamentary Question No. 554 of 16 May 2006, that he was holding on that date with the managers of Limerick City, Limerick County and Clare County Councils regarding possible boundary changes in Limerick; and if changes which would see the three estates of Moyross which are not currently within the city council area become part of Limerick city were discussed. [22408/06]

Arthur Morgan

Ceist:

429 Mr. Morgan asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the action he will take to ensure that the boundaries of Limerick city are extended in line with the desire of the majority of residents of the three estates of Moyross not currently within Limerick city to join with the rest of the Moyross local authority estate and become part of Limerick city in view of the fact that Limerick County Council has indicated in a letter to a representative of this Deputy’s party in Limerick that they have no objection to the transfer going ahead. [22409/06]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 428 and 429 together.

I met with the Limerick City Manager, and the Limerick County and Clare County Managers on 16 May 2006 with a view to initiating consideration of the range of options open to the three Councils in the context of the application by Limerick City Council for an alteration of the boundary of the City of Limerick, including the Moyross area, and my response of 5 April 2006 to the Limerick City Manager. The Managers have agreed to put in place a suitable exploratory process, with the assistance of my officials, having regard to the need to develop the Limerick/Shannon Gateway to its full potential.

Public Service Charges.

Brian O'Shea

Ceist:

430 Mr. O’Shea asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the amount of commercial rates collected by each local authority in 2005; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22423/06]

The amount of rates income included by each local authority in its 2005 budget is set out in the following table. Details of actual amounts collected will be available following publication by all local authorities of their 2005 annual financial statements.

Local Authority

Local Authority Type

2005 Budgeted Rates Income

Carlow

County Council

3,971,318

Cavan

County Council

6,137,500

Clare

County Council

26,758,658

Cork

County Council

67,964,000

Donegal

County Council

16,484,600

Dún Laoghaire Rathdown

County Council

65,072,500

Fingal

County Council

80,106,155

Galway

County Council

13,969,550

Kerry

County Council

14,181,348

Kildare

County Council

26,519,938

Kilkenny

County Council

7,989,239

Laois

County Council

6,916,657

Leitrim

County Council

3,150,070

Limerick

County Council

21,498,969

Longford

County Council

2,800,400

Louth

County Council

5,284,300

Mayo

County Council

10,441,604

Meath

County Council

14,344,694

Monaghan

County Council

4,371,298

North Tipperary

County Council

5,374,346

Offaly

County Council

4,557,663

Roscommon

County Council

6,388,300

Sligo

County Council

3,519,742

South Dublin

County Council

86,457,410

South Tipperary

County Council

5,651,216

Waterford

County Council

4,360,700

Westmeath

County Council

5,776,433

Wexford

County Council

13,207,038

Wicklow

County Council

8,917,112

Cork

City Council

48,576,900

Dublin

City Council

229,456,190

Galway

City Council

21,786,738

Limerick

City Council

24,270,497

Waterford

City Council

15,916,744

Clonmel

Borough Council

3,976,091

Drogheda

Borough Council

5,284,300

Kilkenny

Borough Council

3,960,500

Sligo

Borough Council

5,367,982

Wexford

Borough Council

2,695,129

Arklow

Town Council

1,619,470

Athlone

Town Council

2,549,912

Athy

Town Council

1,580,225

Ballina

Town Council

2,399,925

Ballinasloe

Town Council

1,095,270

Birr

Town Council

937,847

Bray

Town Council

4,497,319

Buncrana

Town Council

1,127,662

Bundoran

Town Council

722,114

Carlow

Town Council

4,310,612

Carrickmacross

Town Council

1,121,828

Carrick-On-Suir

Town Council

653,482

Cashel

Town Council

449,274

Castlebar

Town Council

2,265,061

Castleblaney

Town Council

606,653

Cavan

Town Council

1,389,083

Clonakilty

Town Council

950,946

Clones

Town Council

402,779

Cobh

Town Council

661,653

Dundalk

Town Council

10,154,542

Dungarvan

Town Council

2,219,000

Ennis

Town Council

3,485,480

Enniscorthy

Town Council

1,147,091

Fermoy

Town Council

836,573

Kells

Town Council

511,462

Killarney

Town Council

5,742,481

Kilrush

Town Council

538,303

Kinsale

Town Council

852,562

Letterkenny

Town Council

3,679,722

Listowel

Town Council

1,301,278

Longford

Town Council

1,878,948

Macroom

Town Council

577,801

Mallow

Town Council

1,811,153

Midleton

Town Council

1,236,707

Monaghan

Town Council

2,553,590

Naas

Town Council

4,637,162

Navan

Town Council

1,790,717

Nenagh

Town Council

2,622,723

New Ross

Town Council

999,188

Skibbereen

Town Council

787,002

Templemore

Town Council

358,000

Thurles

Town Council

1,907,500

Tipperary

Town Council

1,071,268

Tralee

Town Council

6,680,174

Trim

Town Council

545,968

Tullamore

Town Council

3,057,217

Westport

Town Council

2,223,393

Wicklow

Town Council

1,012,184

Youghal

Town Council

1,135,815

Brian O'Shea

Ceist:

431 Mr. O’Shea asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the proposals he has to ensure a more equitable waiver system in regard to refuse charges; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22424/06]

Waste collection is properly a local service with individual arrangements being locally determined and tailored to local circumstances. It has never been a matter in which central Government has intervened. The present legal framework, as determined by the Oireachtas, reflects this local nature of waste management services. In accordance with section 52 of the Protection of the Environment Act 2003, the determination of waste management charges (and the provision of waivers) is a matter for the relevant local authority, where it acts as the service provider. Similarly, where a private operator provides the collection service, it is a matter for that operator to determine charges. I have no statutory function in the determination of waste charges and waivers. However, I have been giving consideration to the overall regulation of the waste management sector including whether, and to what extent, there might be a need to identify public service obligations appropriate to service providers. I will bring proposals to Government in this regard shortly.

Planning Issues.

Joan Burton

Ceist:

432 Ms Burton asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the position on the establishment of management companies in respect of new housing developments which consist of traditional houses, in view of his statements to Dáil Éireann that traditional housing developments would not be the subject of management company type arrangements; if his attention has been drawn to the fact that currently new housing estates of traditional houses are being advertised in the Dublin 15 area subject to a management company being set up and purchasers of the houses being liable to pay an annual service charge; the regulations which he has put in place in respect of the development of such management companies; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22452/06]

I have made it clear that it is not appropriate for planning authorities to attach planning conditions requiring management companies to maintain the roads, services, etc., in the case of traditional housing estates, by which I mean estates of houses with their own front and back gardens. It is, of course, open to developers to require that purchasers of residential units become members of a management company irrespective of whether there are planning conditions requiring such companies and it is a matter for buyers to exercise their discretion as to whether to purchase in such a scheme.

As I have stated previously, the related issues of planning conditions regarding management companies and taking in charge can be complex, particularly in the newer mixed estates which contain apartments, duplex houses and terraced houses, with shared facilities such as car-parking and gardens. Genuine questions arise as to whether it is appropriate that all facilities on these estates, which may include high specification paving, lighting and landscaping, should be taken in charge and maintained at public expense. Many of these facilities are replacing the traditional gardens which, in a conventional housing estate, would fall to be maintained by the residents rather than the local authority.

My Department is at present updating the residential density guidelines following on the publication of the Housing Policy Framework: Building Sustainable Communities, last December. It will be appropriate to examine further the issues of taking in charge and management companies in this context. My attention has not been drawn to the developments referred to in the Question. However, in replying to a survey by my Department as to their policy on attaching planning conditions regarding management companies to residential estates, Fingal County Council stated that they were not aware of any instance where they had conditioned a management company in a housing-only context. They stated that in the case of mixed developments, involving apartments and housing, there are instances where management companies have been required, but that in such cases the range of services to be provided by the management company is confined to those not taken in charge in normal housing, such as highly landscaped open space areas and incidental landscaping to a high standard of specification. In such cases, the usual local authority services such as public lighting, water services, bin collection, road sweeping, etc are not required to be provided by the such companies.

Question No. 433 answered with QuestionNo. 112.

Recreational Development.

Fergus O'Dowd

Ceist:

434 Mr. O’Dowd asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the funding applied for by Drogheda Borough Council, Dundalk UDC, Ardee Town Commissioners and Louth County Council to his Department for playgrounds for each of the past three years; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22683/06]

Prior to the Local Authority Playground Grants Scheme 2004, my Department did not operate a specific scheme of grants for playground projects. The 2004 Scheme provided up to 50% funding for the development of new, or renovation of existing, playgrounds throughout the country. While the scheme was administered by the National Children's Office, the grants were paid out of my Department's Vote. Over €2 million was allocated to County and City Councils in respect of 32 new or refurbished playground projects. €72,000 was allocated to Louth County Council under that scheme for a playground at Dundalk. In 2005 my Department provided funding of over €2 million to local authorities for the development of playground facilities. A fixed grant of €60,000 was allocated to each County and City Council, including Louth County Council, to meet the cost of purchase and delivery of playground equipment. No applications for funding were received from Drogheda Borough Council or Dundalk or Ardee Town Councils.

Water and Sewerage Schemes.

Fergus O'Dowd

Ceist:

435 Mr. O’Dowd asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the water and sewerage schemes funded in 2006 by his Department in County Louth. [22684/06]

Details of the major water and sewerage schemes in County Louth that have been approved for funding by my Department are set out in the Water Services Investment Programme 2005-2007 which is available in the Oireachtas Library. My Department recoups expenditure by local authorities on individual schemes in the Programme on foot of certified claims submitted by authorities. Details of the claims recouped to Louth County Council and Drogheda Town Council to date in 2006 are set out in the following table.

Scheme

Amount

Recouped to

Drogheda & Dundalk PPP Contract for Operation and Maintenance

254,001.15

Louth County Council

Drogheda Wastewater Treatment Plant Extension

2,027,009.93

Louth County Council

Tullyallen Sewerage Scheme

197,141.67

Louth County Council

Dundalk Sewerage Scheme

324,298.73

Dundalk Town Council

I have also allocated a block grant of €914,000 to Louth County Council for 2006 under the devolved Rural Water Programme.

James Breen

Ceist:

436 Mr. J. Breen asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the position on Cooralcare Labasheeda, Carrigaholt sewerage schemes; the prospective timescale for the start of the aforementioned; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22725/06]

The Carrigaholt, Labasheeda and Cooraclare Sewerage Scheme is included in my Department's Water Services Investment Programme 2005-2007 as a scheme to commence construction in 2007. Clare County Council is currently reviewing the scheme with a view to improving the cost effectiveness of the proposals. The Council's revised proposals will be given the earliest possible consideration when received in my Department.

Local Authority Housing.

Michael D. Higgins

Ceist:

437 Mr. M. Higgins asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the proposals his Department has received from Galway City Council in the past three years; the number in the Department; the number sanctioned; the number awaiting sanction with their projected dates for sanction; and the number of social housing units likely to be provided in 2006, and in 2007. [22800/06]

The information requested is being compiled and will be forwarded to the Deputy as soon as possible.

Michael D. Higgins

Ceist:

438 Mr. M. Higgins asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government his views on the figures submitted to him by Galway City Council, in accordance with the Housing Action Plan 2004, as a realistic assessment of existing and projected housing needs in Galway city; and the progress which has been made on submission to date. [22801/06]

In 2004 I sought the preparation by local authorities of social and affordable housing action plans for the period 2004-2008. The Action Plans, now at their midway stage are currently being reviewed. The review is focusing on how targets have been met in the first two years of the plan and on incorporating any adjustments required for the remaining years of the plan, in light of performance including expected 2006 outputs, and the results of the recent Housing Needs Assessment.

To facilitate the review my Department has held bilateral meetings with all local authorities to discuss progress, changing needs and targets for the remainder of the Plan. Following the meetings local authorities are required to submit review statements. These will comprise a commentary on overall performance; noting any significant deviations from the original planned targets and the reasons for such deviations; indicating if the overall targets are still valid in light of the recent Housing Needs Assessment or for other reasons; explaining any proposed changes to the targets for the remaining period of the plan; reviewing the plan in light of developments in areas such as Rental Accommodation Scheme (RAS), preparation of Traveller Accommodation Programmes etc. The reviews will also take account of the requirement for authorities to have in place Active Land Management strategies. In this regard authorities will be required to confirm that adequate attention is paid to the land requirements necessary to underpin the expected scale of social and affordable housing delivery. The outcome of the reviews will ensure that local authorities continue to have a framework for the integrated and cohesive planning and delivery over the coming years of specific social and affordable housing measures based on their relevant housing strategy.

In relation to Galway City Council, officials from my Department met with the local authority earlier this month to discuss their Action Plan. I expect that the Review Statement to be submitted following this meeting will present a realistic assessment of existing and projected needs in Galway and outline how the Council proposes to address these needs. Figures in relation to progress to date are available in the Annual Housing Statistics Bulletin published by my Department.

Architectural Heritage.

Bernard J. Durkan

Ceist:

439 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the extent of further planned restoration works at the Geraldine Castle, Maynooth, County Kildare; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22809/06]

Restoration works representing an investment of some €2 million has already been carried out at Maynooth Castle which has facilitated the provision of visitor access and a guide service. No further restoration works are planned.

Water and Sewerage Schemes.

Bernard J. Durkan

Ceist:

440 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government when he expects the augmentation of the sewerage treatment system serving Naas, Sallins, Prosperous and Newbridge to be completed; the extent to which the procedure has advanced to date; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22812/06]

Kildare County Council's revised Preliminary Report and Water Services Pricing Policy Report for the Upper Liffey Valley Sewerage Scheme, which will serve these towns, are under examination in my Department and I expect a decision to issue to the Council shortly. The scheme is included in my Department's Water Services Investment Programme 2005-2007 to commence construction next year. Following approval of the Preliminary Report the Council will be in a position to prepare Contract Documents.

Local Authority Housing.

Bernard J. Durkan

Ceist:

441 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government when he will allocate sufficient funds for a comprehensive local authority housing building programme in County Kildare; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22813/06]

I recently informed local authorities of their financial capital allocations for their local authority housing programmes and have urged them to accelerate progress on the implementation of their housing programmes in order to commence construction and secure completion of as many social housing schemes as possible in 2006. An allocation of €43.2 million has been notified to the Kildare authorities of which €42 million is in respect to the main housing construction programme; this will provide for an estimated 300 house completions and the commencement of over 250 housing starts in 2006.

Bernard J. Durkan

Ceist:

442 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government when he will allocate sufficient funds to increase maximum loan available through the shared ownership scheme to a realistic level and thereby ensure that applicants are not forced to seek supplementary loans from other sources, thereby undermining their ability to repay the combined amount; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22814/06]

I refer to the reply to Questions Nos. 238 and 239 of 4 May 2006. The loan limit for the Shared Ownership Scheme was reviewed and increased with effect from 1 January 2006. The maximum loan that may now be advanced by a local authority in respect of the share of a dwelling being purchased (minimum 40%) is €185,000. While the cost of a dwelling may substantially exceed this amount, the borrower's income must be sufficient to meet the financial commitments involved under the scheme. In determining the level of approved finance or the maximum house price, local authorities are duty bound to consider the ability of applicants to make the necessary mortgage and rent payments. I have no proposals to increase loan limits further but will continue to keep them under review.

Bernard J. Durkan

Ceist:

443 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if his attention has been drawn to the fact some applicants for local authority houses have been on waiting lists for more than seven years; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22815/06]

The relative priority of households on the local authority waiting lists is determined in accordance with the authorities' schemes of letting priorities, the making of which is a function reserved to the elected members. It is the case that some applicants for local authority housing are on waiting lists for longer periods on the basis that their housing need has a relative lower priority compared with the needs of households who have been allocated housing.

In December 2005, the Government launched a new Housing Policy Framework: Building Sustainable Communities which outlines key principles underpinning housing policy and investment over the coming years. Substantial increased investment in social and affordable housing is outlined in the framework. This will allow for some 23,000 new social homes to be commenced between 2006 and 2008; and some 15,000 affordable homes to be delivered. In total, some 50,000 households will benefit over the coming three years from an Exchequer capital investment package of close to €4 billion. Allied to this, a package of reforms is proposed to improve equity, efficiency and effectiveness. The focus is on improving community participation, improving services to ensure personal choice, autonomy and responsibility.

Water Quality.

Bernard J. Durkan

Ceist:

444 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if he has satisfied himself regarding the adequacy and quality of the available domestic water supply; the extent to which adequate storage capacity exists or is intended; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22816/06]

Bernard J. Durkan

Ceist:

446 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the number of water schemes throughout the country deemed to be polluted; the action taken or pending; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22818/06]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 444 and 446 together.

Management of public drinking water supplies is the responsibility of the local authorities which have a range of instruments and measures available to them to produce and conserve sufficient stocks to meet anticipated needs and to ensure quality standards. In addition, my Department coordinates and finances a major programme of investment in improved infrastructure, active leakage control, telemetry and rehabilitation of water mains. Details of such projects are set out in the Water Services Investment Programme 2005-2007 which is available in the Oireachtas Library. The schemes included in the Programme are derived mainly from regular assessments of needs undertaken by local authorities, at my Department's request, as an input to the overall strategy for meeting necessary water supply and treatment requirements. Earlier this year, I announced a record allocation of €133 million for the 2006 Rural Water Programme. The main focus of this allocation is on upgrading group water schemes using sub-standard private sources. These schemes serve approximately 4% of households nationally and planned upgrades are being advanced as a matter of urgency.

Some €3.7 billion will be spent under the National Development Plan 2000-2006 on the provision of water services infrastructure. Substantial increases in water treatment and storage capacity, both for domestic and industrial use, are being achieved as a result of this investment. Schemes completed in the period 1997 to 2005 have produced additional drinking water treatment capacity equivalent to the needs of a population of over one million. The increase in storage capacity over the same period was sufficient to meet the requirements of a population of over 1.5 million. Successive Environmental Protection Agency reports on drinking water verify the fundamentally good quality of public drinking water supplies in Ireland. The most recent report, for 2004, has confirmed an overall compliance rate for all supplies of 96.4%. The report includes details of the results for all schemes monitored and is also available in the Oireachtas Library. Overall, the resources being put in place under the Water Services Investment Programme and the Rural Water Programme should ensure that the coverage and quality of the national water supply infrastructure is adequate to meet current and anticipated demands.

Local Authority Housing.

Bernard J. Durkan

Ceist:

445 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if he has sought or received information from the various local authorities in regard to the number of unfinished housing estates throughout the country; his plans to resolve the issue, either directly or through the local authorities; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22817/06]

In circular letter PD 1/06, issued on 25 January 2006, my Department requested certain information from planning authorities regarding estates to be taken in charge. A summary of this information, based on replies received from planning authorities, is set out in the following table:

C.L PD 1/06: Summary of responses

1

Housing estates to be taken in charge in 2006

587

2

Number of houses involved in estates in Answer 1

27,449

3

Number of housing estates for which the life of the relevant planning permission expired more than 2 years ago which have not yet been taken in charge

2,181

4

Number of estates referred to in Answer 3 in which the relevant permission expired more than 7 years ago

883

5

Number of estates referred to in Answer 3 which are finished (i.e. completed to the required standard under the planning permission)

771

6

Number of houses involved in the finished estates referred to in Answer 5

33,098

7

Number of estates referred to in Answer 3 which are unfinished (i.e. not completed to the required standard within the appropriate period or since)

1,155

8

Number of houses involved in in the unfinished estates referred to Answer 7

32,592

Note: The status of some estates, i.e. finished or unfinished, was not known by planning authorities, hence the total of the number of finished and unfinished estates in Answers 5 and 7 (1,988) does not equal, as it should, the number of estates in Answer 2. Circular letter PD 1/06 also stated that it is necessary for all planning authorities to establish, as a priority, a policy on taking in charge which should be approved by the members of the authority, and reported on to those members on a regular basis and at least once annually. It was further stated that the policy should as a minimum provide that: developers should be required, through the development management process/permission, to complete estates to a standard that is acceptable to the authority for taking in charge, whether in its entirety or, for larger developments, in stages; certain specified standards to be met. Those standards should be set out, where possible, in consultation with local representatives of the construction industry; an acceptable level of security to be provided by the developer towards the completion of the estate. This security will not be released until the estate is completed to the specified standards; the procedures to begin taking in charge housing estates will begin promptly on foot of a request by the owners of the houses in the estate or by the developer, as appropriate. Where an estate is not completed within the appropriate period, enforcement action will be pursued against the developer vigorously and promptly to ensure that the developer completes the estate. All available legal remedies will be used to enable that to be done. The bond obtained from the developer will be applied to carry out any outstanding work where needed to ensure the estate is completed within a reasonable period; sufficient funding will be made available from local authority resources to address ‘problem' or longstanding cases on a phased basis. Timeframes for taking in charge such cases will be communicated to local residents and adhered to. Particular priority will be placed on resolving those estates that have been left unfinished/not taken in charge for the longest period.

Finally the Strategic Infrastructure Bill, which is currently before Dáil Eireann, proposes to amend section 35 of the Planning Act to enable the planning authority to refuse permission to a developer who has been in substantial non-compliance with a previous planning permission. The applicant will have to apply to the High Court if he or she wishes to have the decision overturned. This will be a reversal of the current position as set out in section 35, whereby a planning authority wishing to refuse permission in such a case must obtain the authorisation of the High Court.

Question No. 446 answered with QuestionNo. 444.

Local Authority Funding.

Bernard J. Durkan

Ceist:

447 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the funding made available by his Department for sewerage schemes categories under the heading of small schemes; if his attention has been drawn to the need for a substantial increase in such funding with particular reference to minimising pollution; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22819/06]

I have allocated €19.825m to county councils for 2006 in respect of the Small Public Water and Sewerage Schemes measure of the Rural Water Programme. Responsibility for the operation of the measure, including the prioritisation, selection and implementation of individual schemes, has been devolved to county councils since 1997. Based on a recommendation by the National Rural Water Monitoring Committee, investment under the Rural Water Programme in recent years has concentrated on improving drinking water quality in rural water supplies and in privately sourced group water schemes, in particular. Completion of the rural water upgrading proposals set out in the Committee's Action Plan will facilitate a review of the funding arrangements for other measures in the Rural Water Programme, including a greater emphasis on small public water and sewerage schemes.

Bernard J. Durkan

Ceist:

448 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if his attention has been drawn to the inadequacy of the funding available for group sewerage schemes throughout the Country; his plans to address this issue; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22820/06]

Bernard J. Durkan

Ceist:

449 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government his proposals to increase the funding available to the various local authorities for group sewerage schemes; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22821/06]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 448 and 449 together.

In June 2005 I approved funding for the provision of new waste water facilities at seven locations in County Tipperary as a pilot programme to test a range of new, small-scale waste water collection and treatment systems under Irish conditions. The pilot programme, proposed by the National Rural Water Monitoring Committee, will also test a low cost, low maintenance system to collect, treat and dispose of effluent from existing septic tanks. The objective of the pilot scheme is to evaluate new approaches to meeting the waste water collection and treatment needs of rural villages and to examine the potential role for group sewerage schemes in extending the collection systems to households outside the catchment of new or existing sewerage schemes. Implementation of the pilot programme is currently underway. Three of the schemes are expected to be completed by September and the remainder by the end of the year. Performance monitoring of each scheme will commence immediately after commissioning and I will be asking the National Rural Water Monitoring to report on results as they become available. Overall assessment of the pilot programme will inform any review of the current group sewerage scheme grants.

Local Authority Housing.

Bernard J. Durkan

Ceist:

450 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if he will initiate an accelerated local authority house building programme; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22822/06]

Bernard J. Durkan

Ceist:

453 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the number of local authority houses built by the various local authorities and excluding construction by the voluntary or charitable sectors throughout the country in each of the past five years; the number of applicants on local authority housing waiting lists; if a projection has been carried out to reduce the waiting lists appreciably; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22825/06]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 450 and 453 together.

The most recent assessment of need for social housing was undertaken by local authorities in March 2005 indicated that there were 43,684 households on local authority waiting lists compared with 48,413 in March 2002 — a decrease of almost 10%. Information on the number of local authority housing units constructed each year for the past five years up to the end of September 2005 is published in my Department's Annual Bulletins of Housing Statistics and is also available on my Department's website at www.environ.ie. Information for the full year 2005 will be published shortly in my Department's Annual Bulletin of Housing Statistics and on the Department's website. In December 2005, the Government launched a new Housing Policy Framework: Building Sustainable Communities which outlines key principles underpinning housing policy and investment over the coming years. Substantial increased investment in social and affordable housing is outlined in the framework. This will allow for some 23,000 new social homes to be commenced between 2006 and 2008; and some 15,000 affordable homes to be delivered. In total, some 50,000 households will benefit over the coming three years from an Exchequer capital investment package of close to €4 billion. Allied to this, a package of reforms is proposed to improve equity, efficiency and effectiveness. The focus is on improving community participation, improving services to ensure personal choice, autonomy and responsibility. The overall impact of these measures will impact positively on waiting lists for social and affordable housing. I recently informed local authorities of their financial allocations for their local authority housing programmes and have urged them to accelerate progress on the implementation of their housing programmes in order to commence construction and secure completion on as many social housing schemes as possible in 2006. The total allocation for 2006 is €942 million. This should allow for the completion of over 5,000 housing units in 2006.

Fire Service.

Bernard J. Durkan

Ceist:

451 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the extent to which expenditure on the fire services is in keeping with modern requirements and international standards; if the latest technology is available throughout the service; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22823/06]

Bernard J. Durkan

Ceist:

452 Mr. Durkan asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government if, arising from recent reports, he has in mind proposals to enhance, augment or upgrade the full-time or part-time fire services with particular reference to the need for modern equipment for use in emergencies or in the event of a terrorist attack; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22824/06]

I propose to take Questions Nos. 451 and 452 together.

The provision of a fire service, including equipment, training and the employment of both full-time and retained fire-fighting personnel, is a statutory function of the individual fire authorities and my Department has no direct role in this matter. My Department supports the local fire authorities through the setting of general policy, the provision of capital funding, the issue of guidance to fire authorities in relation to fire prevention and operational matters and other such initiatives. Over the past 25 years, almost €240 million has been provided by my Department to local fire authorities under the fire services capital programme for the provision of new and refurbished fire stations and the purchase of fire appliances and other equipment. At this stage, over two-thirds of our fire stations, including almost all of the busiest stations, have been replaced, we have a modern fleet of front-line fire appliances, and we have a modern emergency response communications system. The fire services capital allocation for 2006 is almost €20 million. The Fire Services Council assists fire authorities through the provision of training courses and seminars to supplement the training provided by the authorities themselves. Since 2001, my Department has provided over €2.3 million to the Fire Services Council for this purpose. Also, since 2001, my Department has provided almost €4.2 billion in general purpose grants to assist the local authorities in carrying out their statutory functions, including the provision of fire services.

Question No. 453 answered with QuestionNo. 450.
Question No. 454 answered Question No. 74.

Ministerial Responsibilities.

Paul McGrath

Ceist:

455 Mr. P. McGrath asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the functions which have, since the last general election, been delegated to Ministers of State at his Department by the Government under powers conferred on it by section 2(1) of the Ministers and Secretaries (Amendment) (No. 2) Act 1977; and the statutory instrument number of each such order. [22843/06]

Since the last general election no order has been made in respect of my Department to formally delegate functions to Ministers of State. I refer to the reply to Question No. 230 of 18 May 2006 which sets out the present position in relation to the delegation of functions in my Department.

Heritage Centres.

Dan Boyle

Ceist:

456 Mr. Boyle asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government the progress in the development of a Pearse Heritage Centre at Rosmuc, County Galway; and the role other Departments are playing with this project. [22850/06]

My Department is involved in ongoing discussions with both the Department of Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs and the Office of Public Works on the possible development of a visitor centre at Pearse's Cottage in Rosmuc. Important issues have arisen around development costs as well as the future running of such a centre. Further discussions are planned in the near future.

Community Development.

Brian O'Shea

Ceist:

457 Mr. O’Shea asked the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government when decisions will be reached on recent funding applications (details supplied) to the local government policy section of his Department under the social and community facilities scheme 2006; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [22851/06]

All eligible projects submitted under the Social and Community Facilities Capital Scheme will be appraised against the assessment criteria which are set out in guidelines issued to local authorities. When this appraisal process is complete a number of projects will be selected for grant aid. It is envisaged that allocations will be made to successful projects by the middle of this year.

Barr
Roinn