Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Wednesday, 27 Jun 2007

Vol. 637 No. 3

Adjournment Debate.

Services for People with Disabilities.

I thank the Ceann Comhairle for allowing me to raise this matter.

The individual involved is 18 years old and after spending 13 years at the Nano Nagle special school in Listowel, she commenced a three-year training course at the St. John of God training centre, Ashe Street, Tralee, last September. The course deals with independent living including the use of ATM machines, shopping skills and other social skills. Her self-esteem and confidence have improved considerably and she is very happy with the course. Her parents are also very happy that she is making considerable progress.

The individual's sister has driven her to the centre every morning since she commenced the course and she was allowed to use the bus servicing St. Ita's and St. Joseph's special school in Tralee to travel home every evening. This bus collected her at the centre and the arrangement worked well. However, as St. Ita's and St. Joseph's school has now closed for the summer holidays she has no transport home in the afternoon. Her sister will not be able to drive her to the centre over the next three months as she will not be working in Tralee.

An application was made to the Health Service Executive for funding for a taxi service. However, I understand this will not be granted because it would cost too much as the individual involved lives over 13 miles from Tralee. The individual is not capable of using public transport as she is not mature enough to do so and could be vulnerable if she were to meet the wrong person. Her parents, who are very concerned, are willing to play their part but expect to receive some assistance from the State. This does not seem to be forthcoming. Surely the public finances needed to look after individuals such as the girl in question are available.

The girl wishes to complete this course. Her parents also want her to continue the training course but it now seems they may have to keep her at home and she may have to abandon her course because transport is not being provided. As I indicated, while her parents are willing to help with the transport, they are not prepared to transport her twice a day. Both of them are getting older and need some assistance in this regard. I appeal to the Minister of State, Deputy Gallagher, to direct the Health Service Executive to provide the necessary assistance in this case.

I am pleased to take this opportunity to address the important issues raised by Deputy Deenihan. I emphasise the Government's commitment to providing a high-quality service to all those with a disability. This commitment is illustrated by the substantial investment we have made in disability services in recent years. Between 1997 and 2006, additional revenue and capital funding of €851 million was invested in health funded support services for people with disabilities, of which €549 million was provided for persons with an intellectual disability and those with autism.

A sum of €75 million for revenue purposes was provided for disability services in the 2007 budget, of which €41 million was provided for people with intellectual disability and those with autism. This sum incorporates the 2007 element of the Government's multi-annual investment programme for the national disability strategy, which is committed to providing approximately €900 million capital and revenue funding over the period from 2005 to 2009. The €41 million will provide 255 new residential places, 85 new respite places and 535 new day service places. This funding includes €2.2 million for the transfer of persons with an intellectual disability or autism from settings which are inappropriate to their needs.

The priority in 2007 is on enhancing the assessment and support services for children with disabilities. This will also help to build the additional capacity in multidisciplinary and other support services required under the Disability Act 2005 and the Education for Persons with Special Educational Needs Act 2004.

On the matter raised by the Deputy, I understand from the Health Service Executive that the St. John of God, Kerry, services are not funded directly to provide transport to and from the home locations of their service users. Consequently, many service users and their families access funding for transport from the community welfare department of the Health Service Executive, southern region, to fund private transport arrangements such as taxis, depending on the individual's circumstances and-or location. The executive has also advised that the person referred to by the Deputy in details supplied has applied to the community welfare officer for the Health Service Executive's southern region in Tralee and the matter is under active consideration.

State Airports.

I wish to share time with Deputy Creed. The issue I raise arises from the decision by a former Minister for Transport, Deputy Seamus Brennan, to break up Aer Rianta into three airport authorities, namely, Dublin, Cork and Shannon. At the time, the then Minister stated on a visit to Cork:

When I establish the independent Shannon and Cork authorities on a statutory basis they will both commence business free of debt. The existing debts associated with both airports, including the debt associated with the major new investment programme at Cork will not be assigned to the new companies but will remain with Dublin Airport.

At the time the Minister also stated, "Given the strong growth at Dublin, the overall scale of operations there and the reality of the present situation, I do not feel that absorbing the debts for Shannon and Cork would place an unreasonable additional burden on Dublin."

It is a different situation today. There has been no movement on the proposed separation of the three airport authorities, no move on the independence of Cork Airport and obfuscation and denial by the Government on the debt issue. Despite continual pressing from Members of this House, local public representatives, the chamber of commerce in Cork and the Cork Airport Authority, the Government still refuses to commit to the debt free status that was originally promised. The Government has been hiding behind consultants' reports instigated by the Dublin Airport Authority, the Cork Airport Authority and the Government itself but there has been no resolution of the issue.

This was everybody's favourite issue before the election, whether one was in Opposition, a member of the governing parties or the leader of the Green Party. As reported in the media, the former leader of the Green Party, Deputy Trevor Sargent, signed a pledge in Cork stating he would commit to ensuring that Cork Airport would be independent and debt free. We were told the programme for Government would contain a commitment to ensuring Cork Airport's debt free independent status but there is no sign of it. The Minister of State at the Department of Agriculture and Food, Deputy Sargent, should explain to the House exactly where he stands on this issue. He should explain how he was able to sign a pledge as leader of the party when in Opposition but now, when he has led his party into Government and seconded the nomination for Taoiseach last week, we see no sign of that commitment in the programme for Government.

This is a serious matter. The airport has been open for 12 months but there has been no resolution to the debt issue. Nobody knows who is paying for the airport because it has not been made clear. Morale is very low at the airport. The Cork Airport Authority refuses to accept anything other than debt free status. We need a resolution of this issue, which is very important for Cork Airport but even more important for the Cork region. Without a viable airport, the region has no future. I look forward to the Minister's response on the matter.

I congratulate the Leas-Cheann Comhairle on his appointment and wish him well. I thank Deputy Deirdre Clune for sharing time with me.

If anything reflects the Pale mentality of the current Government, it is the decision on Cork Airport. A commitment by Government announced by the previous Minister was alluded to by Deputy Clune. It calls into question the value of a Government statement or a Government collective decision announced by an individual Minister, and the value of the programme for Government entered into by the PDs, the Green Party and Fianna Fáil, of which we have been advised, if commitments given are not honoured.

The boardroom at Cork Airport is in turmoil and the main losers will be the travelling public who use the airport, which is a brand new facility and a tribute to everybody who contributed to its development, design and opening. However, if the airport is not debt free, the costs for the travelling public will be much higher than they should be due to higher air fares and the availability of fewer destinations — in recent weeks a decision was made by Aer Lingus to withdraw the Cork to Madrid route, for example. Other operators are not coming to Cork and other destinations will be dropped because costs will be higher for operators using Cork Airport.

This is the consequence of the decision the Government has left with Cork Airport. There is turmoil in the boardroom and this uncertainty does not serve the public in Cork well. I appeal to the Government and to the Minister, at this late stage, to honour the commitments announced by the former Minister for Transport, Deputy Seamus Brennan.

The State Airports Act 2004 provides the framework for the establishment of Shannon and Cork as independent airports. As part of the airport restructuring process the boards of Cork and Shannon airports are required to prepare business plans for eventual separation. Due to the fact they are interlinked, the production of the three airport business plans must be co-ordinated by the Dublin Airport Authority before being submitted to the Ministers for Transport and Finance for their approval under the State Airports Act 2004. They must be satisfied that the airports have the capacity to operate on a sound commercial basis before giving final approval to the business plans.

The Minister for Transport understands that the Dublin Airport Authority, DAA, has been advised by consultants on the appropriate financing proposal that would facilitate the statutory objective of the separation of Cork Airport from the DAA in a timely manner, consistent with the requirements of the State Airports Act 2004 and the Companies Acts. He is aware that the outcome of this analysis was that Cork Airport could sustain a certain level of debt while remaining a viable enterprise. He understands that the board of the Cork Airport Authority also engaged consultants to further examine the issue of the Cork debt.

The debt issue is crucial to the business planning process and must be addressed by the Cork Airport board and the DAA before any business plan is completed and submitted to the Ministers for Transport and the Marine and Finance. The Government's position is that the funding of the new terminal and other works at Cork Airport must take account not only of what is commercially and financially feasible for Cork Airport but also what is commercially and financially feasible for Dublin Airport.

If the Cork Airport Authority is to achieve autonomy in the foreseeable future, it must accept responsibility for a reasonable portion of the outstanding debt in return for the substantial assets to be transferred to it on separation. In deciding what level of debt is to be borne by Cork, it must be manifest to all concerned that it is a manageable debt burden that would not put at risk the airport's commercial future.

There remains a significant opportunity for Cork Airport to achieve the autonomy that the region needs and desires. On behalf of the Minister for Transport and the Marine I urge all concerned to seize the opportunity for autonomy by recognising that a manageable debt burden is essential in order to make Cork Airport's independence a reality.

Public Transport.

I thank the Leas-Cheann Comhairle for the opportunity to raise the issue of public transport services, particularly bus services, in the greater Dublin area, but it is unfortunate the Minister for Transport and Marine is not in the House to respond. I raise these issues in the context of significant under provision of public transport generally within the area.

We know it makes sense for all kinds of reasons — economic, social and environmental — to encourage and facilitate as many people as possible to use public transport. In the past, the need was to convince people of that argument, but now they fully accept it. The issue now is the Government's inability to provide adequate public transport to meet the demand. It is clear from the length of bus queues during the morning and evening peaks and the cramming of people into buses, trains, the DART and the Luas that the demand far outstrips supply. This is the challenge for the Government, but it has failed in this regard in recent years.

Late last year the Government finally allowed Dublin Bus to acquire the 100 additional buses that had been promised for years. To date, only 40 of these have been put into service, leaving 60 brand new buses idle in garages around the city while people stand in queues waiting for buses to get them into or home from work. This makes no sense. This morning the Taoiseach said the reason was that there were not enough drivers. This is not true. Dublin Bus has been recruiting drivers for the past six months and has many new drivers ready and able to take up employment. Unfortunately, Dublin Bus has not received the necessary approval from the Department to deploy the buses on the routes on which they are needed. Dublin Bus proposes to introduce new routes, the 141 to serve the huge conurbation of Swords and the 128 for the north fringe and the housing development there. People are demanding these services and Dublin Bus is ready to provide them but is precluded from doing so because the Department will not provide the necessary approval. It claims it has received requests from private operators, but there seems to be a serious ideological hang-up or log-jam in the system. As long as an application from a private operator is under consideration the public bus company is not allowed to provide new services. That does not make sense. Those applications could be under consideration for nine or ten months or even longer because of the inefficient system in the Department. Meanwhile people are left without services.

Dublin Bus wants to use the Dublin Port Tunnel as a fast route into the city centre. It has started to do this recently for the 41X bus, an express bus running from the Swords area into the city centre every morning. Six buses operate on the route. A total of 25 minutes could be cut off the journey time if the buses used the Dublin Port Tunnel. As the buses are full by the time they reach Whitehall where they hit the traffic jams, they would not bypass passengers. As express buses they should have a direct route into the city centre.

The route has been provided at taxpayers' expense in the form of the Dublin Port Tunnel. It is a fast, direct route and it makes sense for Dublin Bus to use it but because a private operator has submitted a request the Department of Transport and Marine will not allow Dublin Bus to do the sensible and rational thing. I appeal to the Minister of State to give the message clearly to the Minister for Transport and Marine that people in Dublin cannot afford to wait any longer for decent bus services. The buses and the drivers are in place. They await only approval from the Department of Transport and Marine. I urge the Minister to do the sensible thing, give those approvals and provide people with the service to which they are entitled.

I congratulate the Leas-Cheann Comhairle on his appointment and wish him every success.

In September 2006, Exchequer funding of €30 million was announced towards the cost of 100 additional buses for Dublin Bus. Dublin Bus took delivery of these buses in 2006. These additional buses enable Dublin Bus to expand the number and frequency of services throughout its network to the benefit of customers across the Dublin Bus network. As a result up to 8 million additional passengers are expected to be carried each year.

The deployment of these buses across the network is an operational matter for the company. Since the arrival of the new buses, the company has commissioned and introduced 42 into service in areas such as North Wicklow, Tyrrelstown and Finglas, Skerries, Portmarnock and Malahide.

Dublin Bus has informed the Minister for Transport and Marine that the balance of the new buses will be commissioned and in operation in time for the peak period from September next when demand is greatest. Areas to benefit in the coming months include the Merrion Road quality bus corridor, the Ballymun quality bus corridor, Blanchardstown, Finglas, Meakstown etc.

The only area where Dublin Bus has been advised it is not in a position to proceed with a new service is the route 141 from Swords to the city centre via Drumcondra. This is because the company must await a decision on a prior application from a private bus operator for a licence for bus services along the route. In the past year, the Department of Transport and Marine has received a total of 76 notifications from Dublin Bus to initiate or amend services. Of these 56 were noted and therefore authorised, three were withdrawn by the company, two were advised they would require section 25 applications, three have been deferred due to a prior application from a private operator and one service has been part approved and is now in operation. The Department, however, has deferred a decision on some bus stop elements of that proposal and 11 notifications have been received in the past three months and are being processed in the normal way in respect of other routes across the city. As can be seen from this data, most Dublin Bus service changes have been approved.

Since January 2001, Dublin Bus is required to give at least four weeks' advance notice to the Department of Transport and Marine about proposals to initiate new services or to alter its existing bus services. The purpose of this procedure is to ensure a level playing field between Dublin Bus and private operators in the authorisation of service changes. Dublin Bus is also subject to compliance with the requirement of the provisions of section 25 of the Transport Act 1958 concerning competition with licensed private operators.

There is no delay in clearing Dublin Bus notifications where there is no conflict. However, where the proposed service change is judged likely to compete with an existing licence, the application may be refused or a decision deferred until the prior application has been finalised. In accordance with standard regulatory procedures, the prior application from the private bus operator, made under the provisions of the Road Transport Act 1932, as amended, has to be considered first. Once the licence application has been processed, the Department of Transport and the Marine either clears the notification or Dublin Bus is asked to review its proposals in the light of the licence issued to the private operator for the route in question. Under section 25 of the Transport Act 1958, Dublin Bus also has the option to seek the Minister's consent for the initiation or amendment of services operated so as to compete with a licensed passenger road service. These procedures are adopted in the interest of an orderly approach to the regulation of the bus market and considered to be of benefit to Dublin Bus, private bus operators and the consumer.

The use of the Dublin Port tunnel by Dublin Bus on a regular basis for its services is subject to the company complying with the requirement to give formal notification to the Department of Transport and the Marine. So far, the company has only formally notified the Department of its wish to use of the port tunnel for three of its services. Approval has been given, without delay, for two of these services and Dublin Bus is now operating routes 33X and 142 through the tunnel.

The third proposal from Dublin Bus for use of the Dublin Port tunnel is for changes to four of the existing services on the 41X route and no extra services have been sought which would require the deployment of extra buses. Dublin Bus has been informed that a decision on the proposed 41X changes has been deferred because the Department of Transport and the Marine has a prior application from a private operator to provide a commercial express bus service, without State subvention, from Swords to the city centre, via the port tunnel. Deliberations on this application are at an advanced stage.

Schools Building Projects.

I join my colleagues in congratulating Deputy Howlin on his recent election to the position of Leas-Cheann Comhairle. I also thank the office of the Ceann Comhairle for allowing me to address this issue tonight. It concerns an emerging crisis in Dublin 15 at both primary and secondary level. I particularly want to discuss the secondary school crisis in Castleknock, a suburb of Dublin with a population of 40,000 and only one secondary school. It is clear from the numbers attending the primary schools within the catchment area that by 2009 the 210 places available in the school each year will not be adequate. They are already not adequate but by 2009 at least 90 local children will be turned away from their local school. The direct responsibility for this lies with Fianna Fáil and, in particular, the Minister for Education and Science, Deputy Hanafin, and the Minister for Transport and the Marine, Deputy Dempsey, who, as recently as last year, told us in written answers that an additional school was not needed in Castleknock. As a result of those answers, attempts by me and other councillors to reserve a site in the Fingal county development plan were thwarted. I hope the Minister of State, in his response tonight, treats this issue with respect. I do not want to hear about Hansfield, Tyrellstown or Phibblestown, any more than I want to hear about schools in counties Westmeath, Kilkenny and Carlow. I hope he will address directly the secondary school crisis in Castleknock.

I have four simple questions which I hope the Minister of State will answer. First, does the Department accept its responsibility for allowing this crisis to develop? Second, has it acquired a site and, in particular, entered negotiations with Castleknock College, the local fee-paying school, with regard to acquiring a site? Third, will the Minister commit to establishing a new school, even if it has to be on a temporary site, by 2009, regardless of whether a site can be acquired? Fourth, will the Minister commit to appointing a provisional board for the new school before the end of the year?

I thank the Deputy for raising this matter as it affords me the opportunity to outline to the House the actions being taken by the Department of Education and Science to address the post-primary school accommodation needs of the Dublin 15 area. The Department is conscious that Dublin 15 is one of the most rapidly developing areas in the country and, as a result, there has been a marked increase in the demand for primary school places in the area. A range of extra primary school accommodation has or is being put in place to address this need. The knock-on effect of this development is expected to start manifesting itself at post-primary level from 2008 onwards. There is currently spare capacity in two post-primary schools in the Dublin 15 area, namely, Riversdale community college with 150 spare places and Blakestown community school with 350 spare places. In the circumstances, the Department is satisfied that there are sufficient places to cater for needs in the short term, even though every pupil may not secure a place in the school of first choice.

For the medium term, the Department is advancing plans to make 4,000 extra post-primary places available in the Dublin 15 area. It has already given the go-ahead for the delivery of a new 1,000 pupil post-primary school in Phibblestown. This new school will be delivered, with new schools for the rapidly expanding areas of Donabate and Laytown, under a design and build contract. The Department is working with the relevant parties on the delivery of these projects within the earliest possible timeframe. It has also reserved a site for post-primary provision in the Tyrrelstown area of Dublin 15. It is likely that this school will also be a 1,000 pupil facility. The educational reservation in the Hansfield strategic development zone also allows for the development of a post-primary school for up to 1,000 pupils. A project manager has recently been appointed to oversee the development of educational provision on this site.

With regard to Castleknock specifically, the Department is working closely with Fingal County Council to identify a site for the development of a new post-primary school. Once acquired, a timeline can be set for the delivery of a building. Consideration will also be given to an early start-up of the new school once the Department is satisfied that the use of all other accommodation in the area is being maximised.

In the coming years the Department will be delivering four new post-primary schools in the Dublin 15 area. Apart from the considerable extra primary provision also being made, this will represent a massive and unprecedented capital investment in the area. The Department is keenly aware of the need to deliver this infrastructure in line with demand and is working assiduously to achieve this. It will also continue to keep the situation in the area under review and to work with the local authority to ensure any other emerging needs are addressed as quickly as possible.

I again thank the Deputy for raising this matter in the House.

The Dáil adjourned at 10.20 p.m. until10.30 a.m. on Thursday, 28 June 2007.
Barr
Roinn