Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Tuesday, 17 Jun 2008

Vol. 656 No. 4

Adjournment Debate.

Leaving Certificate Curriculum.

I call on the Minister for Education and Science, Deputy Batt O'Keeffe, to introduce European studies along with civic, social and political education, CSPE, as a subject at second level for the leaving certificate curriculum. Irish membership of the European Union has had profound economic, social, political and cultural consequences. In 1973, Ireland was among the poorest, least developed member states and one of the most reliant upon small-scale agricultural production. Our position has been transformed within a generation to one in which Ireland is one of the most successful economies in the European Union.

If the experience of canvassing for a referendum on the Lisbon treaty has taught us anything, it is that despite our application for membership of the European project in 1961 by the then Taoiseach, Mr. Sean Lemass, some 47 years ago, we know and understand relatively little of its structures and procedures. How many times have we heard people claim, especially over the last few months, to be unable to understand the treaty since the campaign for this referendum first began? How often have people dismissed the text of the treaty as technical and difficult? That is because it is technical, difficult and legalistic. As this treaty is about changes to structures, rules and procedures, we have found it necessary to try to explain what those structures are in the first place. If people are not fully aware of the functions of the three pillars of the European Union, for example, how can we expect them to understand or make judgments on changes to the way in which they work?

It is disempowering to be deprived of the understanding of how the social and political world actually works. A lack of political and social science education reduces people's choices as political actors in society. When understanding is missing it results in a lack of ownership of the political process. Democracy is undermined when the people do not understand its structures and rules. We have only begun to understand and respect the people's right to information and familiarisation with political structures in our own country. Great strides have been made to improve political, social and personal education in recent years. The targeting of younger people through the curriculum will benefit generations to come. The development of social, personal and health education, SPHE, in primary schools, CSPE at post primary level and the great work involved with Comhairle na nÓg and Dáil na nÓg have all played a part in educating our young people in politics and society.

The recent development of a schools programme about the work of the Houses of the Oireachtas is commendable and we can see from the extraordinary response of the public and the demand for tickets for the inaugural Oireachtas family day event that an appetite for information clearly exists. Some 4,000 people registered for the event within hours of the tickets becoming available. Members of the public have clearly shown that they want to connect with the centre of politics and it behoves us as parliamentarians to facilitate connection and communication, not just with the Oireachtas but with the European Union as well.

There is a need to bring European studies into second level education as a subject in its own right, unless it could be incorporated with CSPE which is taught up to junior certificate level and could be extended to leaving certificate level. Such a development would widen the opportunity for future generations to learn about and better understand the European Union and our place within it.

Much has been written in recent weeks in the media about how successful Irish representatives, senior officials and interest groups have been in their dealings with EU institutions and our European partners. Such people know how the Union works and how to interact effectively with our European partners to achieve our policy goals. We should not rest on our laurels. We should be preparing future generations for their place in Europe. How better to ensure that the European Union and its structures are clearly understood than by teaching about it in our schools?

Confining EU studies to third level automatically reduces the level of participation. European studies should be a choice of subject at all third level institutes of technology and universities. The availability of European studies at second level would widen the participation and significantly enhance our knowledge of the European Union and its structures and procedures, which are very important to our daily lives. A reasoned and reasonable debate can only be fostered if, as a society, we have a better understanding of what our political systems are and how they work. Opportunities for debate and discussion should not be confined to a month or two before a referendum.

We need to develop greater awareness at all levels about the European Union, whether through schools or through public information programmes. Our second level schools are a good place to start. I urge the Minister of State, Deputy Haughey, to consider that the Government should seriously examine introducing European studies as a subject at second level. The subject could also be introduced on a pilot basis in second level schools, for example in Limerick West in the towns of Abbeyfeale and Newcastle West, or in Kerry North in Listowel or Tralee. The better informed we are, the more engaged we will be and the better decisions we can make. Our democracy could only be the better for this.

The National Council for Curriculum and Assessment has been established to advise the Department on the curriculum for primary and second level schools. The council has no plans at present to introduce European studies as a subject in the leaving certificate.

Civic, social and political education is a mandatory subject for all students in the junior cycle and is an examination subject which is assessed through a written paper and an action project. The aim of the action project is to give students practical experience of active citizenship. This includes fostering a sense of belonging and awareness of social inclusion and justice issues, a capacity to gain access to information and structures relating to the society in which they live and an ability and confidence to participate in democratic society. Students choose a theme for their action project which is designed around the skills of identification and awareness of a social justice issue, planning, research, analysis and evaluation, reporting and engaging in joint action which develop social and political skills.

CSPE is based on seven basic concepts, which ought to underpin all citizenship-based activity in our communities, not just our schools. These concepts are human dignity, rights and responsibilities, stewardship, development, democracy, the law and interdependence. There are four units in the programme — the individual and citizenship, the community action project, the State, and Ireland and the world. Topical issues in the latter unit are the EU and its structures, including the European Parliament, the European Commission and the Council of Europe. In addition, subjects like history, geography, science, music and art include a European dimension and the languages offered in second level schools provide for a cultural awareness component.

The report of the task force on active citizenship includes a recommendation on the development of a senior cycle programme on citizenship for schools. Since 2005, the National Council for Curriculum and Assessment has been involved in an intensive phase of planning and development in key areas of the senior cycle. A new subject, politics and society, which is proposed as an optional examinable full subject, is being developed. A background paper on social and political education in senior cycle has been published for consultation. A report on the consultation process was completed in May 2007. Both reports are available on the council's website, www.ncca.ie. Development work is continuing. The Minister for Education and Science has not yet received formal proposals on the matter from the council. He looks forward to receiving its advice on this issue at an early date. In addition, the “in search of Europe” module is commonly offered in the transition year programme. The programme, which is followed by over 28,000 students, is a flexible framework by means of which schools can offer optional modules which encourage personal development, active learning, social awareness and community participation.

The European studies curriculum development project was established in 1986 by the Department of Education in Northern Ireland, the Department of Education and Science in Ireland and the Department for Education and Employment in the UK. The project is jointly funded by the education departments in Northern Ireland and Ireland. The overall aim of the project is to encourage co-operation between participating students and staff and to contribute to educational development in the wider dimension of the European Community. It informs students about current social economic and political issues and structures at national and European level. Some 282 schools from 24 jurisdictions participate in the European studies project. The highest participation levels are in Northern Ireland, where 81 schools are participating, and the Republic, where 71 schools are participating. The schools work in clusters of five or six. Each cluster must have two schools from Northern Ireland — one from each tradition — and a school from Ireland.

Various units of study and topics in the junior and senior programmes have been designed to assist students in examining areas of shared interest today and areas of conflict in the past. They are intended to broaden the students' knowledge and understanding of their own place and their relationship to others in the Europe of today. The junior programme, which is curriculum-based, offers units of study supported by specially produced materials in the areas of English, geography and history. It uses English as its language of communication and is confined to students between the ages of 11 and 15. The senior programme, which can be adapted to meet the needs of students aged 15 years and over, is a one-year course of study. It is cross-curricular in scope and allows students and their teachers to choose from a range of topics with economic, political, cultural, technological, social and environmental perspectives.

The Minister for Education and Science is waiting for the NCCA to outline examples of its proposals to include short courses in the leaving certificate examination. The implications of those proposals in terms of teacher qualifications, assessment and resources will have to be determined. If such courses are approved, they will provide a vehicle by means of which this issue may be further explored. However, I am satisfied that the current curriculum, allied with future development of a subject on politics and society, will provide a strong basis through which the study of the role of the European Union and its culture, structures, history and impact can be progressed.

Higher Education Grants.

I am pleased to have an opportunity to raise this outrageous case, which relates to the interpretation of Article 4.5 of the guidelines for the 2007 higher education grants scheme. The parents of the student who is involved in the case, Michael Ikerionwu, were granted permission to stay in this country for three years, renewable by applying in the final month of the third year. Mr. Ikerionwu, along with his father, mother and brother, was granted permission to stay. Article 4.5 of the guidelines state that a person applying for a higher education must have EU nationality, have official refugee status, have been given humanitarian leave to remain in the State prior to the Immigration Act 1999, or be a person in respect of whom the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform has granted permission to remain following a determination not to make a deportation order. Mr. Ikerionwu was initially refused a grant by Galway County Council. The case was appealed by his parents to the council, but that appeal was lost. They then appealed to the Minister, on my advice. I appealed the decision to the then Minister for Education and Science, Deputy Hanafin, but I have yet to receive a reply. The student received a reply, however.

I received a letter from a staff officer in Galway County Council after I made my appeal. I wish to refer to the letter sent to me by Martina Maloney of Galway County Council. The letter refers to my representations on behalf of Mr. Ikerionwu, who applied for a higher education grant for the 2007-08 academic year. I was told that as the student did not have official refugee status, his details had been referred to the Department of Education and Science to ascertain whether he met the criteria of Article 4.5 of the higher education grants scheme. The council was advised by the Department that the student did not meet the criteria. The student was informed on the basis of that advice that he was not eligible for a grant for the 2007-08 academic year. The council informed me that, on receipt of my representations, it re-examined the student's application and endeavoured to get details of his status from the Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform. The council was informed by that Department's repatriation unit, after numerous requests for final confirmation of his status, that the student complied with the scheme's necessary requirements. The letter from the council said it was pleased to inform me that it intended to award the student a higher education grant for the 2007-08 academic year, on receipt of some documentation regarding his parents' rent allowance for the 2006 tax year.

That letter was sent to me on 10 April last and the student in question received a letter confirming his grant on 11 April. However, he received a further letter from Galway County Council on 29 May. The letter referred to Mr. Ikerionwu's higher education grant application and to the council's letter of 11 April 2008. That was the letter which informed him that the council had reviewed his application, based on information received from the Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform. The letter of 29 May said that the council had been informed by the Department of Education and Science that the information received regarding the student's residency status was not sufficient. According to that letter, the council regretted to inform Mr. Ikerionwu that it was unable to award him a grant for the 2007-08 academic year. The letter contained an apology from the council for any inconvenience that its decision may cause.

We have sought an interpretation. The Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform had told me, the student and Galway County Council that it had decided that the student qualified for a grant under Article 4.5. The Department of Education and Science over-ruled that decision. The student, having applied for a grant, been refused the grant, appealed that decision and then been granted the grant, had it taken from him six weeks later. Given that he is making an incredible effort to pursue his third level studies, the reversal of the original decision makes a mockery of integration. It is an outrageous contradiction, after the Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform had written to me, the county council and the student to outline its ruling, that the Department of Education and Science has taken back the grant that had been awarded under appeal.

I thank the Deputy for giving me an opportunity to outline the Department's position on an application by the student in question for funding under the higher education grant scheme. The Deputy will be aware that the Department funds four maintenance grant schemes for——

It is important to put everything in context. If the Deputy does not wish me to reply, that is fine.

The Minister to continue without interruption, please.

Does the Deputy wish me to continue?

The Deputy will be aware that the Department funds four maintenance grant schemes for third level and further education students. These are the higher education grants scheme, the vocational education committees' scholarship scheme, the third level maintenance grants scheme for trainees and the maintenance grant scheme for students attending post-leaving certificate courses. The higher education grants scheme is administered by the local authorities. The other three schemes are administered by the vocational education committees. Under the terms of the maintenance grant schemes, grant assistance is awarded to students who meet the prescribed conditions of funding, including those which relate to nationality, residency, means and previous academic attainment.

In the case of the individual referred to by the Deputy, the decision on eligibility for third level grants was a matter for Galway County Council. Its initial decision, advised to the candidate referred to by the Deputy on 21 February 2008, was that he did not satisfy the nationality requirement of the higher education grant scheme. Following an initial appeal of this decision to the local authority, Galway County Council again wrote to the candidate on 19 March 2008 advising that the decision remained unchanged.

On 10 April 2008, a notice of appeal was received from the candidate by the Department. The Department responded to the candidate on 18 April 2008 advising that the letter from the Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform in respect of an application for temporary leave to remain in the State stated that a decision had been made to grant "temporary leave to remain in the State" in this instance. This condition is not one of those specified under the nationality clause of the maintenance grant schemes. On that basis, the Department upheld the original decision, and decision on appeal, of Galway County Council.

The Department is aware that, following Galway County Council's decision on appeal, the council reviewed the application based on e-mail correspondence with the Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform. It is the practice that clarification required in regard to nationality issues for grant eligibility is referred to the Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform through the Department in the first instance. In the circumstances, the Department has recently made contact with the Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform in respect of this case. A formal written request for clarification will issue from the Department to the Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform to establish more clearly the grounds on which the candidate was granted temporary leave to remain in the State. The Department will correspond directly with the candidate and with Galway County Council, if necessary, following clarification from the Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform in the matter.

Will he get his grant?

The student maintenance grant schemes include for grant purposes those awarded official refugee status. The Department understands that the candidate did not satisfy the conditions to be awarded official refugee status by the Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform. The issue to be clarified is the basis on which temporary leave to remain in the State was awarded.

The Deputy will appreciate that it is not open to me, my Department or the assessing authorities to depart from the terms and conditions of the maintenance grants schemes in individual cases. However, the Department is prepared to review the matter in the light of advice received from the Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform.

He is not excluded under Article 4.5.

Barr
Roinn