Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Wednesday, 29 Sep 2010

Vol. 716 No. 1

Adjournment Debate

Hospital Services

On 9 August, when the Dáil was in recess, HIQA announced an investigation into ongoing services at Mallow General Hospital. Tonight I want to put forward the views of those I represent who have a particular interest in the investigation and who felt strongly that it was spurious and unnecessary.

The investigation was announced on the basis of a specific complaint about procedures from someone at the hospital. We now know that was not the case, and know there was no specific incident related to the treatment of a person. We also know the investigation arose from the fact that in April 2009, HIQA published the report of the investigation into the quality and safety or services in Ennis, that there would be recommendations arising from that, and that a report would follow for Mallow, which was a similar hospital but that had never been put forward by the HSE. It was on foot of that alone that HIQA decided to go into Mallow General Hospital.

The process at present is that HIQA has met representatives of the hospital and the staff and is continuing its investigations. The staff at the hospital operate in constrained circumstances and are punching above their weight. In June, after many years of campaigning, an executive management board was finally put in place. The hospital is under the auspices of CUH but for years it was left on its own, devoid of support from the larger hospital.

I will bet money that when the report is published, it will clearly show that the staff and personnel at the hospital have delivered, in spite of the HSE bearing down on them while refusing to put in place adequate funding. This report will vindicate the doctors, nurses and other staff in the hospital by showing they are in no way negligent and are doing more than they should to deliver services. It will also show that management structures were inadequate and the HSE never properly resourced the administrative function at the hospital, which led to inadequacies in terms of reporting procedures. It will also show that CUH never adequately recognised Mallow for the facility it is as part of its operation.

I want to point out that the staff support the hospital and maintain that services can be modified. They are willing to work with the HSE to achieve that and doctors, nurses and staff will buy into the change management process. We do not want to see a reduced service facility, however, or to see the hospital's capacity being sacrificed on the HSE's altar of cost efficiency. This is key because we will modify services but we must not reduce capacity. We can deliver the services within the hospital but we must be given the opportunity to do so.

I will be taking this Adjournment matter on behalf of my colleague, the Minister for Health and Children, Deputy Mary Harney, and I thank Deputy Sherlock for raising the question.

Patient safety is central to the delivery of health services and people must have confidence in the care they receive and have the best possible outcomes. The overwhelming consensus among clinical experts, as seen in cancer care, is that patients have demonstrably better outcomes where complex care is delivered with the necessary staff and equipment and with sufficient volumes of activity. The evidence also emphasises the need to provide timely emergency care to patients in an appropriate setting.

Achieving better outcomes for patients will require hospitals to change the services they deliver to their communities and how those are delivered. Reconfiguration of acute services in the Cork and Kerry area will produce improved services. The clinical benefits for patients will be significant and the treatment offered will be of the highest standard. The Minister and the HSE recognise the importance of Mallow General Hospital and the contribution it has made, and will continue to make, to the provision of hospital services in the region.

The HSE has not yet finalised its proposals for the future reconfiguration of the region's hospitals. In August 2010, HIQA announced an investigation into the quality and safety of services in Mallow General Hospital. The authority had identified concerns about the types of patients being treated, centred on major surgery, emergency and critical care services.

The purpose of the investigation is to ascertain whether safe, quality services and practices are in place and to ensure that, where there may be a serious risk to the health or welfare of a person receiving a service, such risks are identified and recommendations made with a view to eliminating or reducing risks for patients. In line with the terms of reference, the authority's review will include measures at local, regional, corporate and national level to implement the national recommendations in the authority's 2009 Ennis report; current arrangements for management and provision of clinical services in Mallow to minimize risks to patient safety, including critical and acute care and anaesthetic, surgical and emergency services; and local, regional, corporate and national clinical and managerial governance arrangements for safe care and transition to new service provision models. The authority will publish its report and recommendations following the completion of the investigation.

Finally, the Minister wishes to emphasise that she rejects any claim that the HIQA investigation is spurious as suggested in the text of the Deputy's question. HIQA is an independent statutory body that makes its own decisions about what investigations to carry out and in what way. The process will be entirely independent and there will be no pre-judgment of the outcome. The investigation will deal not solely with Mallow, but will also look at the wider context of acute hospital services in the region. The Minister supports the decision by HIQA to carry out an investigation and she believes that it will be to the benefit of service quality for patients. I am satisfied that the outcome of these processes will lead to a strengthening of the quality and safety of acute hospital services for people in the Cork and Kerry region and will ensure that they have access to health services that comply with best practice in the right facilities and in a timely manner.

Air Services

Kerry Airport is one of the main drivers of the County Kerry economy. Some 148 people are employed at the airport, 66 of whom are employed directly, a further 84 in car hire and taxi services and the bar and restaurant franchise and a further 30 are Ryanair staff. It also supports thousands of jobs in the county where the live register for August shows unemployment at 16,029 or 17% of the workforce. Last Thursday the people of Kerry were shocked when Ryanair announced its withdrawal of the PSO contractual obligation it entered into with the Minister and the reduction in flights from Kerry to Dublin from three to one. If the current PSO payment of €1.75 million, which goes directly into the running of the airport, is withdrawn the airport's future viability will be seriously compromised.

According to a comprehensive response to the Department of Transport on the operation of the PSO at Kerry airport by Dr. Sean Barrett, if the airport was to close the social welfare payments per year for the staff made redundant would be €2.585 million, which is 48% more than the PSO payment of €1.75 million per year. Dr. Barrett also pointed out that 432,000 passengers who use Kerry Airport currently pay €1.9 million to €2 million in airport tax. The €10 tax is paid by 148,000 departing passengers to the United Kingdom, Germany, sun destinations and ad hoc overseas charters, resulting in Exchequer revenues of €1.48 million. The passengers on the Dublin-Kerry route pay €2 departure tax at both Kerry and Dublin, yielding Exchequer revenues in excess of €500,000. The airport taxes paid on Kerry trips are thus 14% greater than the amount paid in the PSO to Kerry Airport.

The value for money report carried out by the Department of Transport on regional airports in regard to PSOs, which I am aware will be considered by the Government shortly, will show that Kerry Airport is in a very good position as regards value for money. In 2009, outbound flights from Kerry to Dublin facilitated 56,000 passengers. The new arrangement proposed by Ryanair would result in just one flight from Kerry to Dublin each day, leaving Kerry at 9.45 a.m and returning at 4.45 p.m. If one wants to travel from Dublin to Kerry to do business or for any other purpose by air it could result in two overnights in Kerry unless one has an early morning meeting at the airport.

The possible closure of Kerry Airport reduces its connectivity, not just on the United Kingdom and German routes but to Dublin and onward connections through Dublin. From Dublin and the connecting points Kerry would become a significantly more remote place, with enhanced accessibility costs. When people decide to stay away from Kerry and relocate their business and tourism elsewhere, output in the Kerry economy will be drastically affected and unemployment and emigration will rise.

In conclusion, I call on the Minister of State to convey to the Minister that every pressure must be put on Ryanair at this stage to fulfil its contractual obligation with the Government to complete its PSO arrangement, which ends next July. If that does not happen it must select another airline, and I understand Aer Arann is now in a position to take on this task in the very near future.

Deputy Deenihan has outlined the facts in regard to Kerry Airport eloquently and there is no need for me to reiterate them. However, this much must be added. There are salutary lessons to be learned from the behaviour and performance of Ryanair at Kerry Airport. In 2008 Ryanair made a bid for the PSO contract at the airport in order to run flights three times a day from Dublin to Kerry and back again. It did so by undercutting the price of Aer Arann, which was then operational and successful at the airport. It removed Aer Arann from the route by an old method which is known as predatory pricing. It resulted in Aer Arann getting out of the marketplace in so far as the Dublin-Kerry route was concerned and being replaced by Ryanair. Ryanair replaced Aer Arann with three enormous aeroplanes on the route comprising 189 passengers per plane. I doubt if it filled the aeroplane on any day. In any event, we are into the third year and Ryanair is to pull the plug on Kerry Airport and says it will not fly the route three times a day any more, but only once a day.

It is very clear what has happened. Aer Arann went into examinership. Ryanair saw that the coast was clear and decided that it would then leave Kerry Airport for the most part and retain one flight per day, and do so on a commercial basis without the aid of the PSO. Interestingly, in its statement to the press Ryanair said that it did not believe the public service obligation should exist any longer. So much for Ryanair's commitment to regionalisation. It was, I suppose, a purely commercial decision but the predatory nature of it is something of which all governments should take heed.

Monopolies in dominant positions in the marketplace are always undesirable. They are always dangerous, and they always end up with a sad tale. This is a particularly sad tale, as Deputy Deenihan has outlined, because of the serious adverse consequences it has on tourism and commerce for the people of County Kerry. Ryanair did not simply walk out of County Kerry. It did leave a commercial route, as it stated, to Dublin each day and operates international flights from the airport. In the interest of balance I will say that much of the work done by Mr. O'Leary and Ryanair in this country has been fairly laudable. However, I find some of their practices to be despicable and in this particular instance it cannot be described as anything other than despicable.

The company was obliged to give the Government three months' notice of its intention to leave Kerry County Airport. It decided to give no notice whatsoever. It waited until the contract was beginning to run out — next July — and when it saw that it could possibly get away with it without perhaps being sued, it simply upped and left. That is not good enough and it is not acceptable.

As an island nation we must think very deeply about the way we are going to deal with aviation and the kind of policies we will keep and implement for the future because if we are going to allow monopolies in dominant positions in the marketplace decide the future of our people, in so far as aviation is concerned, the future of our people, particularly in the regions of this country, and more particularly in the peripheral regions, is fairly bleak.

The Minister for Transport sends his apologies to the two Deputies and realises that this is a serious issue and one that is close to the hearts of the Deputies' constituents.

The Minister is very aware of the possible implications for Kerry of Ryanair reducing its level of services on the Kerry-Dublin route. This service is operated under the current public service obligation, PSO, contracts for services linking Dublin Airport with the regional airports at Derry, Donegal, Sligo, Ireland West in Knock, Galway and Kerry.

These contracts commenced on 22 July 2008 and are due to expire on 21 July 2011. Exchequer subvention is paid in respect of these services on the basis that they would not be provided by the airlines on a fully commercial basis.

In the case of the Kerry route, following an EU public tendering process, a bid submitted by Ryanair emerged as the winner. The bid met the requirement in terms of proposed operating timetables as set out in the specifications published in the EU Official Journal, which stipulated that three return flights per day would be provided. The bid from Ryanair also set out the compensation it required to operate the service. Based on that bid, Ryanair was awarded the contract to provide the scheduled air services over the three year contract period and are receiving payments in accordance with the contract.

The Minister for Transport refutes recent claims by Ryanair in regard to the PSO contract and states that he has met his obligations under the terms of that contract. The Minister is currently considering the company's notification to reduce frequencies on the route from three daily return services to one daily return service with effect from 1 November 2010 on a commercial basis outside the PSO arrangement. A response will issue to Ryanair once all options have been examined, having regard to the terms of the contract, the obligations on Ryanair to provide a service under that contract and EU legislation. I will convey the views of the Deputies who spoke on this important issue to the Minister.

Electoral Divisions

A boundary extension into County Clare is unnecessary, inappropriate and seeks to resolve a problem that does not exist. Such action will divide people of a common heritage, alienate them from their roots and undermine the foundation of their identity. Those citizens of County Clare whose identity is immersed in the history, heritage and community of County Clare would be dealt an unwarranted and unwelcome injustice if a boundary extension was granted for no obvious gain or mitigating benefit. In essence, these people would be robbed of their identity to resolve a bureaucratic impasse that has arisen in the minds of some. The governance of an area, region, county or parish should exist to serve the people and not to serve the bureaucracy.

I reject without reservation the proposal to extend the city of Limerick into County Clare. I reject the assertion that those people who live in that area have not got a real connection with County Clare and can, at the stroke of a pen, find themselves reclassified as Limerick people. The bedrock of our society is based on parish and county boundaries, and one's identity is intrinsically linked to this structure.

I reject the notion that this move will somehow improve the prospects of attracting foreign investment to the region and, consequently, improve the job prospects of those who so tragically occupy the jobseekers' queue. The report has not outlined in any material way how one job will be created or the life of one resident improved by this hostile act.

A smoke screen has been created by some in the region who have had a land grab on their minds for many decades. I appeal to those in control of Limerick City Council, namely, the Labour and Fine Gael members, to withdraw their stated desire to extend the boundary of Limerick city into County Clare. Since this issue is being debated in the House I ask the leadership of Fine Gael and Labour to bring to bear on the councillors in Limerick city the views and wishes of the people of the county I represent. They must make a clear signal of their views on this matter.

I reject the public utterances of the chairman of the boundary committee in which he implies that this is just the beginning of the process and that if Clare County Council does not do as he says, more land will be taken. That sounds like an individual who is used to getting his own way. The last time I checked, this is still a democracy and that individual was not elected to any public office. His role is in an advisory capacity and only an advisory capacity.

While the Minister must take the advice that emanates from people like that I ask that he would listen also to the advice and views coming from this House. In my short time in the Dáil I have demonstrated a capacity to support tough and unpopular decisions where I have adjudged them to be in the best interest of the country, county or region. If I thought for one minute that the movement of the boundary was the right thing to do, I would support it, but it is not, and I will not support any moves to alter the boundary between Limerick and Clare.

This is a very serious issue in County Clare and the fact that it has cross-party support from Deputy Dooley and myself and from the other Oireachtas Members also is an indication of the strength of support it has in the county.

I thank the Ceann Comhairle for facilitating me with this debate. The Limerick local government authority, which was established by the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Deputy Gormley, to prepare a report into the most appropriate arrangements for local government for Limerick city and county, has recommended the setting up of a single authority to manage Limerick city and county. That is fine but, unfortunately, the report also proposes that this expanded authority would include parts of County Clare which runs from Larkins Cross into Limerick city, taking in the housing estates of Shannon Banks and Westbury.

Approximately 3,000 people currently live in that area south of east Clare. The committee under Mr. Brosnan concluded that change is necessary and is motivated solely by the need to create coherent areas which will facilitate more effective governance structures. I suggest that extending the remit of a new Limerick authority into sections of County Clare is misplaced and misguided.

This report is a Limerick solution to a Limerick problem. It is not a regional solution to a regional problem, which is what is required in this case. If we are to break the cycle of unemployment and fuel an economic recovery in our region, all of our energies must be focused on working together.

I want to make it clear on behalf of the people of County Clare, and I am disappointed that the Minister, Deputy Gormley, is not present, that we do not want a boundary change. The spirit of people in County Clare is best displayed in all aspects of the sporting and cultural life in our county. The Minister of State need only cast his mind back to Croke Park and 1995, when Clare hurlers bridged an 81 year gap to win the All-Ireland Hurling Final, to understand the importance and pride in County Clare and in the County Clare jersey.

The people of County Clare have a deep sense of identifying and belonging to their county and that is no more evident than in the parishes of Meelick, Parteen, Ardnacrusha and Clonlara.

If the Minister starts to tamper with the Clare boundary where will it stop? Will Limerick demand to extend as far as Shannon Airport in a few years time?

I appeal to the Minister of State to give serious consideration to alternative proposals which would deliver greater co-operation between the local authorities in both counties, while at the same time respecting the wishes of the people of County Clare. The divide and conquer strategy has always failed so I appeal to the Minister of State to bin the proposal to extend the Limerick boundary into Clare. The development of our region will be best served by respectful understanding of our differences. Working together in a spirit of co-operation is the only way forward to restore the fortunes of the region.

The Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government asked me to convey his apologies on not being able to attend the Dáil tonight to the two Deputies who raised this very important matter from their point of view.

The Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government established the Limerick local government committee in February of this year under Part V of the Local Government Act 1991 to prepare a report into the most appropriate arrangements for local government for the city and county of Limerick. The committee was specifically tasked with making recommendations for improved arrangements, to help inform Government decision making. Mr. Denis Brosnan chaired the committee. Mr. Brosnan is also chair of the mid-west task force, and his personal achievements in the business world lend additional weight to the independent perspective of the committee.

In noting the decline in particular of Limerick's urban core, the high levels of unemployment and the significant deprivation, the committee concluded that the multiplicity of authorities in the area had led to unhelpful competition, policy fragmentation and a lack of coherence. The report, published earlier this month, contains the committee's recommendations on the current structures of local government in Limerick. These are directed at renewing local government with the objective of addressing the social and economic difficulties in Limerick.

The committee's principal recommendations include the incorporation of the contiguous urban areas of Limerick within an expanded city area. Such a city area would have a population of almost 100,000, including approximately five square kilometres of land with a population of approximately 3,000 which is currently part of Clare, and would, therefore, be the third largest city in the State. It also recommends the establishment of a new unified Limerick local authority to represent, manage and administer the city and county of Limerick, replacing Limerick City Council and Limerick County Council. The new authority would service a population of approximately 187,000 people.

The committee considered that there is a compelling case for the proposed change with regard to the hinterland of Limerick city in southern Clare. The committee pointed out that this change will not affect divisions used for purposes other than local government, for example, by sporting associations. There is a very proud sporting tradition in Clare and we in Cork fully appreciate that. All stakeholders should examine the report carefully and consider the recommendations it contains with a view to determining the benefits for the mid-west region as a whole. A strong city is a crucial component of a strong region.

It is significant that the business community in Limerick has called for the implementation of the report's recommendations as soon as possible. The Limerick Chamber of Commerce is unequivocal in its support. Shannon Development has also welcomed the report and has given all of the recommendations its strong support, stating that, "the long-term economic development prospects of the Shannon Region are best served by having Limerick City as a strong, vibrant metropolitan core fulfilling its potential as the economic driving force of the Region". Greater local government coherence in Limerick is necessary for many reasons, including to help support regional development, improve the business environment and to play its role in the major regeneration efforts currently under way.

The strength of county identities and the attachment people have to their counties is acknowledged. The Minister notes that the committee took the position that the need to create coherent areas to facilitate more effective governance structures should not be overridden by such attachments, however strong.

It is important that we act on Limerick, and the Minister, Deputy Gormley, will soon bring proposals to Government for discussion with a view to early implementation of the Government's decisions. In the meantime, pending Government consideration, comment by the Minister in any further detail on the report's recommendations would be inappropriate, other than to observe that the detailed analysis presented in the committee's report presents an extremely strong argument for action on the current structures of local government in Limerick.

Redundancy Payments

I thank the Ceann Comhairle's office for the opportunity to raise this matter and I will be brief. I welcome the Minister of State, Deputy Billy Kelleher, who will reply to the debate but I am disappointed, given the fact that I met him in the public corridors five minutes ago, that the Minister with responsibility for this matter, Deputy Batt O'Keeffe, has not turned up in the Chamber.

Today, this month's live register figures were published and almost 450,000 people are unemployed. I will not dwell on the Government's lack of a jobs policy. I am here to try to assist in problem solving because for thousands of people getting their statutory entitlement to a redundancy payment is proving to be an extraordinary endurance course. I raised this matter some weeks ago with the Minister, Deputy Batt O'Keeffe, who seemed to take some comfort in the fact that the waiting list for redundancy payments had been cut from 43,000 last November to 33,000 in August this year. On that basis of progress, we will be waiting several years before the list will be cleared, given the fact that thousands more come onto the list every month.

To me, the State should aspire to pay statutory entitlement to people going through a very traumatic time in the shortest period possible, and an eight-week period should be the target for the Government to set itself. That is not an excessively burdensome target. The basis for achieving this is in the Croke Park agreement, which states:

In view of the major economic challenges facing the country the Government are committed to obtaining maximum efficiencies from, and reducing the size of, the Public Service. The Government and the public service unions confirm that in the context of a reduction in numbers serving in the public service:

(i) it will from time to time be necessary to increase staffing in certain designated priority areas in accordance with Government policy

It also states that the Minister reserves the right to redeploy civil servants as may be required and appropriate between Departments to meet priority needs.

The question that the Minister, Deputy O'Keeffe, has to answer, and that the Minister of State, Deputy Kelleher, might attempt to answer, is what priority is attached by the Government to paying people their statutory redundancy when they lose their jobs. I understand it is a cumbersome process if a former employer does not co-operate and a recommendation is required from the Employment Appeals Tribunal. However, in the majority of cases it should be straightforward. I am sure the Minister of State accepts that seven or eight months is an unacceptable delay.

The genesis of the solution to the problem is the Croke Park agreement and I wish the Minister would get on with it. Perhaps he is unable to exert sufficient influence around the Cabinet table — I am loathe to indicate he might be the weakest link in Cabinet — to get the necessary resources.

The subject matter of many parliamentary questions today is when the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Innovation will pay individuals named in those questions their entitlement to statutory redundancy. The Minister of State can head off this issue by obtaining sufficient resources. People ring up and are referred to the National Employment Rights Authority; the Department will not even answer the phone. I could understand that if we were making progress in payments but there is a seven or eight month waiting list for people for their statutory entitlement and that is simply not acceptable. I urge the Minister of State to problem solve and obtain more staff resources. In many areas in the public and Civil Service there is not the same demand now that there is a reduction of activity in our economy, and human resources need to be directed to where we have problems. I implore the Minister of State to address the issue.

I thank Deputy Creed for raising this matter on the Adjournment. Without starting a political debate on the issue, the Croke Park agreement is a critical component in the overall restructuring of public services and the delivery of services to the public. At the time, we were criticised quite a lot by some Members opposite for spending too much time engaged in discussions with the unions trying to reach an agreement. That is an aside but it is important to point out that the Croke Park agreement is an integral part of reform of the public services.

Unfortunately, the economic downturn has left employers with little choice other than to radically reorganise and rationalise their business models, unfortunately leading, in the worst case scenario, to making employees redundant.

Fortunately, in the first eight months of this year, there is concrete evidence of a levelling off of redundancy levels. In 2009, the monthly level of redundancy claims lodged with my Department averaged almost 6,500 a month and, to date this has reduced to an average of just under 5,500.

The Department administers the Social Insurance Fund in redundancy matters on behalf of the Department of Social Protection and makes two types of payment from the fund — rebates to those employers who have paid statutory redundancy to eligible employees, and statutory lump sums to employees whose employers are insolvent and/or in receivership or liquidation.

The Department is currently processing redundancy claims including rebates and lump sums dating from February and March of this year so that the waiting time is approximately six or seven months. In some instances, where the necessary supporting documentation for claims is not provided to my Department, or where queries arise, processing of claims can be further delayed until the required documentation is provided and/or outstanding queries are resolved.

The Department has made significant efforts to deliver more acceptable turnaround processing times for redundancy payments given the difficulties that this gives rise to for individual employees and for the business community. Measures already taken in the Department in 2009 to alleviate the pressures on the payments area include: almost doubling the number of staff through reassignment to a current level of 52 full-time equivalents; establishment of a special call-handling facility in NERA to deal with the huge volume of telephone calls from individuals and businesses concerned about their payments; better quality information relating to current processing times on the Department's website; and engagement with the Revenue Commissioners to facilitate the offset of redundancy rebate payments by employers against existing outstanding tax liabilities which those employers owe to the Revenue Commissioners.

I was there for a period as Minister of State with responsibility for labour affairs. It is the Minister of State with responsibility for labour affairs who is statutorily functionally responsible for the redundancy section. This was something that was becoming very evident, and we started to move resources and tried to put in place mechanisms that would facilitate and expedite payments.

Not with any great success.

I accept that the backlog and waiting times remain at an unacceptably high level. However, improvements are evident and the waiting times are reducing. I should point out that my Department has, in the eight-month period up to the end of August 2010, processed 51,800 claims, a 96% increase compared to the corresponding period in 2009 when the level of claims processed was 26,405. The number processed in that period also outstrips the total number of claims processed for the whole of 2009 when the level of claims processed was 50,664.

Overall, new claims received in the first eight months of 2010 amounted to 43,449, a fall of just over 20% over the corresponding eight-month period in 2009 when 54,439 claims were lodged. Indicative figures for September, with one further day to go, are promising and point to a significant levelling off of new claims. If this trend continues, it will be very welcome.

The claims backlog, which reached its highest level at 43,000 in the latter quarter of 2009, has been reduced considerably to a level of 32,137 at the end of August 2010 representing a reduction in the backlog of almost 11,000 claims. I understand that when the September figures are finalised over the next day or so, the backlog will show a further significant reduction to about 30,000.

Responsibility for the payment functions arising under the redundancy and insolvency payment schemes is due to be transferred to the Department of Social Protection with effect from 1 January 2011. In transferring the functions between Departments, it is the intention that this will operate seamlessly and without any adverse impact on the service levels being experienced by individuals or the business community awaiting payment of redundancy claims.

The 52 full-time staff work exceptionally hard. They work well and beyond the call of duty. They are flexible and they are conscious that behind these statistics are employees and employers who have faced a difficult turbulence in their lives due to the difficult economic circumstances and those who have lost their jobs.

The Dáil adjourned at 11.25 p.m. until 10.30 a.m. on Thursday, 30 September 2010.
Barr
Roinn