Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Wednesday, 8 Jun 2011

Vol. 734 No. 4

Order of Business

It is proposed to take No. a8, motion re establishment of select committees; No. b8, motion re establishment of Select Committee on European Union Affairs; No. c8, motion re establishment of Joint Committee on the Implementation of the Good Friday Agreement; No. d8 — motion re establishment of Joint Committee on Investigations, Oversight and Petitions, No. e8, motion re Standing Orders 79, 82, 82A, 83, 92, 94A, 99, 102, 105 and 163; No. 8, motion re presentation and circulation of Revised Estimate 2011 [Vote 4] and, subject to the agreement of No. 8, it is proposed to take the Revised Estimate [Vote 4]; and No. 3, Social Welfare and Pensions Bill 2011 — Second Stage (resumed).

It is proposed, notwithstanding anything in Standing Orders or the order of the Dáil of 7 June, 2011, that the Dáil shall sit later than 8.30 p.m. tonight and business shall be interrupted on the conclusion of Private Members' business, which shall be No. 25, Spent Convictions Bill 2011 — Second Stage (resumed), which shall take place at 7 p.m. or on the conclusion of No. 3, whichever is the later, and which shall conclude after 90 minutes; Nos. a8, b8, c8, d8 and e8 shall be decided without debate; No. 8 shall be taken without debate and any division demanded thereon or on the Revised Estimate [Vote 4] shall be taken forthwith and, subject to the agreement of No. 8, the following arrangements shall apply in regard to the Revised Estimate: the proceedings shall be brought to a conclusion after 45 minutes, the speeches shall be confined to a Minister or Minister of State and to the main spokespersons for Fianna Fáil, Sinn Féin and the Technical Group, who shall be called upon in that order and who may share their time and shall not exceed ten minutes in each case, and a Minister or Minister or State shall be called upon to make a speech in reply which shall not exceed five minutes; and the proceedings on the resumed Second Stage of No. 3 shall, if not previously concluded, be brought to a conclusion at 7 p.m. tonight.

There are four proposals to be put to the House. Is the proposal that the Dáil shall sit later than 8.30 p.m. agreed? Agreed. Is the proposal for dealing with Nos. a8, b8, c8, d8 and e8, motions re establishment of committees and Standing Orders, agreed?

It is not agreed. Today, the Government is putting in place the terms of reference for the new committees. This is deeply disappointing and is a retrograde step which will reduce accountability in this House and the capacity of the Dáil to have oversight over many Government Departments. It was a consistent theme of the Taoiseach's colleagues in the last Dáil that even single issue committees did not have the time or space to deal with issues in Departments. Despite that widely held view, the Government is now pressing ahead with a change which will, in essence, see the level of scrutiny reduced by two thirds.

If we consider some of what is before us on the Order Paper, for example, the select committees on jobs, social protection and education and skills, we find that three Government Departments are being run into one committee with 21 members.

They are all connected.

The select committee on the environment, community and local government, transport, tourism and sport and arts, heritage and the Gaeltacht comprises another 21 members and covers a wide range of activities and responsibilities.

Where can we get genuine, real and meaningful accountability in the unwieldy committees the Taoiseach proposes to establish? We all support reduced costs——

——and have no difficulty with that but there is a more effective way of doing it than the way the Taoiseach is proceeding.

We did not hear it from you until now.

He will reduce the effectiveness of Dáil committees, not enhance them with the measures that are before the House. I also oppose the guillotining of the Social Welfare and Pensions Bill.

We can deal with that later.

The point has been made that the range of issues to be covered by the committees is such that, even aside from the issue of accountability which is critical, the capacity of them to act efficiently and really deal with the issues at hand is compromised. We object to the fact that these matters are to be decided without debate.

I want to raise in particular the issue of the Committee of Public Accounts. I acknowledge that the Chair of it will go to the Opposition but the balance of the committee is on the Government's side. Given its sensitivity and crucial importance, we believe there a 50:50 balance should have been struck between Government and Opposition Deputies. If that involved increasing the number of Deputies on the committee so be it, but the Taoiseach made the wrong call in respect of that committee and others.

It is quite clear that rolling two or three major issues of governance and Government into one committee is simply a recipe by the Government for ramming through legislation without the proper scrutiny or time that is needed. The selection of substantial areas of Government, which will each take a lot of time in their own right over the remainder of this year, is incredible. Given the lack of time and the amount of pressing business, the Government's intention is quite clear. It should be opposed and stated clearly here.

There is no argument here in regard to costs. We should get rid of the bonanza of fees for Chairs, Vice Chairs, Whips and all the other carry-on that Fianna Fáil stood over and implemented when it was in Government.

(Interruptions).

Deputy Higgins without interruption, please.

I am getting increasingly concerned about the level of frustration I am observing in the backbenches of the Government.

I appreciate your deep concern but I ask you to continue with your contribution.

It is getting to the point where it is interfering with those of us trying to make serious points that need to be taken on board.

I ask you to do your best.

The Taoiseach should have a word with his membership and ask them to try to restrain themselves and recognise the fact that he is supposed to represent them.

Thank you, Deputy.

Deputy Higgins did not mention the €40,000.

What €40,000?

(Interruptions).

I do not know what Deputies had for breakfast but there appears to be a giddiness or excitement about the establishment of committees. I ask Deputy Higgins to proceed.

An allegation was made by Deputy Stagg regarding a sum of €41,000. I am aware of the matter to which he is referring. First——

No, we are dealing with——

I am a member of a registered political party, the Socialist Party, which receives a leader's allowance, as does Deputy Stagg's party, that goes in full to the party.

I am aware of that.

It must also be audited and the audit presented to the Minister for Finance on a yearly basis.

I ask Deputy Higgins to resume his seat.

It is a tax-free allowance.

It is unaccountable, tax-free and in the pocket. The Deputy is on €80,000.

I will put the question.

May I correct one or two of the points Deputies made?

In response to the issues raised by Deputies Martin, McDonald and Higgins, in the last number of Dáileanna we had so many committees that Deputies were running from one committee room to another to make up quorums to commence meetings which then disintegrated. What we have looked at is a restructuring of the way in which committee work is carried out in the House. It is true that the work rate and areas to be dealt with by committee have been expanded. A saving of some 35% will be made and there are no allowances for deputy Chairmen, convenors, Whips or deputy Whips, although there is an independent allocation.

On the point made about the Committee of Public Accounts, while the Chair of the committee has always gone to a member of the Opposition, its composition is strictly proportionate to the reflected vote of the people in the Dáil. The Fianna Fáil Party's wish for an expanded finance committee has been agreed to. There will be no question of ramming through legislation because we intend that the committees will have a proper opportunity to debate and reflect on issues that come before them. From September onwards, heads of Bills will come before the committees. Sub-committees can be set up to deal with particular legislation if necessary. It is a matter for each committee as to how it structures its business and, as the Deputy is aware, it is open to every Member of the House to attend any committee. While non-members do not have a vote, they may contribute and participate in the proceedings that are under deliberation. I hope I have clarified those points.

Question put: "That the proposal for dealing with Nos.a8, b8, c8, d8 and e8, without debate, be agreed to.”
The Dáil divided: Tá, 49; Níl, 42.

  • Keaveney, Colm.
  • Kehoe, Paul.
  • Kenny, Enda.
  • Kenny, Seán.
  • Kyne, Seán.
  • Lawlor, Anthony.
  • Lynch, Ciarán.
  • Lyons, John.
  • McCarthy, Michael.
  • McEntee, Shane.
  • McFadden, Nicky.
  • McGinley, Dinny.
  • McLoughlin, Tony.
  • McNamara, Michael.
  • Maloney, Eamonn.
  • Mathews, Peter.
  • Mitchell, Olivia.
  • Mitchell O’Connor, Mary.
  • Mulherin, Michelle.
  • Murphy, Dara.
  • Murphy, Eoghan.
  • Nash, Gerald.
  • Naughten, Denis.
  • Neville, Dan.
  • Nolan, Derek.
  • Noonan, Michael.
  • Ó Ríordáin, Aodhán.
  • O’Donnell, Kieran.
  • O’Donovan, Patrick.
  • O’Dowd, Fergus.
  • O’Mahony, John.
  • O’Sullivan, Jan.
  • Penrose, Willie.
  • Perry, John.
  • Phelan, Ann.
  • Phelan, John Paul.
  • Quinn, Ruairí.
  • Rabbitte, Pat.
  • Ring, Michael.
  • Ryan, Brendan.
  • Spring, Arthur.
  • Stagg, Emmet.
  • Stanton, David.
  • Timmins, Billy.
  • Tuffy, Joanna.
  • Varadkar, Leo.
  • Wall, Jack.
  • Walsh, Brian.
  • White, Alex.

Níl

  • Boyd Barrett, Richard.
  • Browne, John.
  • Calleary, Dara.
  • Collins, Joan.
  • Collins, Niall.
  • Colreavy, Michael.
  • Cowen, Barry.
  • Crowe, Seán.
  • Doherty, Pearse.
  • Donnelly, Stephen.
  • Dooley, Timmy.
  • Ellis, Dessie.
  • Ferris, Martin.
  • Flanagan, Luke ‘Ming’.
  • Fleming, Sean.
  • Fleming, Tom.
  • Grealish, Noel.
  • Healy, Seamus.
  • Higgins, Joe.
  • Kelleher, Billy.
  • Kitt, Michael P..
  • Mac Lochlainn, Pádraig.
  • McConalogue, Charlie.
  • McDonald, Mary Lou.
  • McGrath, Finian.
  • McGrath, Michael.
  • McLellan, Sandra.
  • Martin, Micheál.
  • Moynihan, Michael.
  • Murphy, Catherine.
  • Ó Caoláin, Caoimhghín.
  • Ó Cuív, Éamon.
  • Ó Fearghaíl, Seán.
  • Ó Snodaigh, Aengus.
  • O’Brien, Jonathan.
  • O’Dea, Willie.
  • Pringle, Thomas.
  • Ross, Shane.
  • Smith, Brendan.
  • Stanley, Brian.
  • Tóibín, Peadar.
  • Wallace, Mick.
Tellers: Tá, Deputies Joe Costello and Paul Kehoe; Níl, Deputies Aengus Ó Snodaigh and Seán Ó Fearghaíl.
Question declared carried.

The third question to be put is the proposal for dealing with No. 8, motion re presentation and circulation of Revised Estimate 2011. Is that agreed to? Agreed.

The fourth item to be put to the House is the proposal for dealing with No. 3, Social Welfare and Pensions Bill 2011 — Second Stage (resumed). Is that agreed to?

It is not agreed to.

I call Deputy Martin.

I make the point that there are many aspects to be considered in this legislation. I do not believe there is any necessity to guillotine this Bill and shorten the duration of its consideration and time allocated for its debate in the House to the degree proposed by the Government. We have had many commitments about Dáil reform and many fine statements about accountability and strengthening the role of Parliament. Every party elected with a mandate coming out of the last election resolved and was committed to putting into effect real and meaningful reform of how this Chamber operates and of how politics works. I have not seen anything emanating from the Government benches that gives any substance or depth to the issue of Dáil reform or accountability. The guillotining of this Bill is a further illustration and example of that.

The Government, very cynically and inappropriately, slipped the reversal of the cut in the minimum wage into social welfare legislation, presumably to give some cover to Labour Party Deputies——

Deputy McDonald would not understand it.

The Members are just using up more time.

——who will vote for an increase in the pension age. It was reduced in a finance Bill and all of us know it should be re-instated through that same mechanism. That is the cynical politics it is at. To add to that, it wants to guillotine the debate on it.

A Deputy

What about low paid workers?

So much for honesty, transparency, telling it like it is and allowing full and frank debate.

The Deputy wants to keep the people in poverty.

This Social Welfare and Pensions Bill contains one of the most reactionary measures that will ever come before Dáil Éireann——

Deputies

Hear, hear.

——and the Government proposes to ram through after a very curtailed discussion a decision that will force those workers who will depend on the State for their pension to stay at work until they are 68 years of age. One of the gains of the labour movement in its attempt——

A Deputy

You will be all right Joe, you will be well retired by then.

Deputy Higgins must be going for early retirement.

Please proceed, Deputy Higgins.

That is the type of comment I come to expect from the backbenchers of this Government. The fact is, ladies and gentlemen, you are making a decision for workers 15 years from now when most of you will have departed the scene with fat pensions——

Deputies

Hear, hear.

——condemning them to stay at work for years longer.

A Deputy

What is wrong with that?

Deputy Higgins is right and the Government knows he is right.

Deputies, please. Deputy Higgins, please proceed.

On a serious note, the Ceann Comhairle will have to do something about discipline on the Government side. It is getting increasingly difficult to make rational points.

I will deal with that, you just proceed.

Many of them are not at all resigned to their lowly status — that seems to be the problem. Maybe the Taoiseach should give them each a board of scrabble or snakes and ladders every morning to keep them busy while we are trying to make serious points here.

I remind the Deputy that he is entitled to make a brief contribution.

One of the gains of the labour movement historically was to achieve a civilising influence on the exploitation of the capitalist system by having a shorter working day, shorter working week, shorter working year and shorter working life and the Taoiseach presumes to reverse all that in the space of a few hours here. It is shameful. He could at least extend the debate into tomorrow. I know the welfare of greyhounds is important. I do not diminish it——

It is not on the list.

——because the welfare of animals is important but the debate on it could be moved forward to another day. I ask for an extension of this debate into tomorrow.

I call Deputy Boyd Barrett on behalf of People before Profit Alliance to make a brief contribution.

There are 19 measures in the Social Welfare and Pensions Bill, all of which will have very far-reaching effects on ordinary people, particularly working people. For some of us it looks like a menu to make ordinary working people work longer and harder for less over the course of their lifetimes, particularly hitting the least well off and manual workers who will be forced to work longer. To push all those measures through in such a short time without allowing adequate time for debate is a subversion of democratic debate in this House and this country.

In this regard, the Taoiseach should examine what is happening in Slovenia where there has been a referendum on the issue of raising the retirement age. The people of Slovenia were consulted in a proper referendum on this very serious measure and they voted 72% against raising the retirement age——

Thank you, Deputy.

——but at least they had a proper public consultation and the right to have a say on what is by any standard a serious measure. The Taoiseach will not give us a referendum. He will not even allow a proper debate in the Dáil on such a serious measure. I appeal to him to allow for proper debate on what is a very serious attack on the rights and entitlements of working people.

On a point of order, do Standing Orders allow for two speakers from each group on such matters?

No, from each party.

A Deputy

I thought Deputy Stagg was a democrat. He did not get a job.

It is just like Deputy Stagg's party, two parties rolled into one, Democratic Left and the Labour Party.

That is why People before Profit Alliance is a party.

A Cheann Comhairle——

Sorry, Deputy. You have spoken. I will now put the question.

(Interruptions).

I remind Deputy Higgins that he was seeking order a moment ago.

Question put: "That the proposal for dealing with No. 3 be agreed to."
The Dáil divided: Tá, 98; Níl, 42.

  • Bannon, James.
  • Barry, Tom.
  • Breen, Pat.
  • Broughan, Thomas P.
  • Burton, Joan.
  • Butler, Ray.
  • Buttimer, Jerry.
  • Byrne, Catherine.
  • Byrne, Eric.
  • Cannon, Ciarán.
  • Carey, Joe.
  • Coffey, Paudie.
  • Collins, Áine.
  • Conaghan, Michael.
  • Conlan, Seán.
  • Connaughton, Paul J.
  • Coonan, Noel.
  • Corcoran Kennedy, Marcella.
  • Costello, Joe.
  • Coveney, Simon.
  • Creed, Michael.
  • Creighton, Lucinda.
  • Daly, Jim.
  • Deenihan, Jimmy.
  • Deering, Pat.
  • Doherty, Regina.
  • Donohoe, Paschal.
  • Dowds, Robert.
  • Durkan, Bernard J.
  • English, Damien.
  • Farrell, Alan.
  • Feighan, Frank.
  • Ferris, Anne.
  • Fitzgerald, Frances.
  • Fitzpatrick, Peter.
  • Flanagan, Charles.
  • Flanagan, Terence.
  • Gilmore, Eamon.
  • Griffin, Brendan.
  • Hannigan, Dominic.
  • Harris, Simon.
  • Hayes, Brian.
  • Hayes, Tom.
  • Heydon, Martin.
  • Hogan, Phil.
  • Howlin, Brendan.
  • Humphreys, Heather.
  • Humphreys, Kevin.
  • Keating, Derek.
  • Keaveney, Colm.
  • Kehoe, Paul.
  • Kenny, Enda.
  • Kenny, Seán.
  • Kyne, Seán.
  • Lawlor, Anthony.
  • Lynch, Ciarán.
  • Lyons, John.
  • McCarthy, Michael.
  • McEntee, Shane.
  • McFadden, Nicky.
  • McGinley, Dinny.
  • McLoughlin, Tony.
  • McNamara, Michael.
  • Maloney, Eamonn.
  • Mathews, Peter.
  • Mitchell, Olivia.
  • Mitchell O’Connor, Mary.
  • Mulherin, Michelle.
  • Murphy, Dara.
  • Murphy, Eoghan.
  • Nash, Gerald.
  • Naughten, Denis.
  • Neville, Dan.
  • Nolan, Derek.
  • Noonan, Michael.
  • Ó Ríordáin, Aodhán.
  • O’Donnell, Kieran.
  • O’Donovan, Patrick.
  • O’Dowd, Fergus.
  • O’Mahony, John.
  • O’Sullivan, Jan.
  • Penrose, Willie.
  • Perry, John.
  • Phelan, Ann.
  • Phelan, John Paul.
  • Quinn, Ruairí.
  • Rabbitte, Pat.
  • Ring, Michael.
  • Ryan, Brendan.
  • Spring, Arthur.
  • Stagg, Emmet.
  • Stanton, David.
  • Timmins, Billy.
  • Tuffy, Joanna.
  • Varadkar, Leo.
  • Wall, Jack.
  • Walsh, Brian.
  • White, Alex.

Níl

  • Boyd Barrett, Richard.
  • Browne, John.
  • Calleary, Dara.
  • Collins, Joan.
  • Collins, Niall.
  • Colreavy, Michael.
  • Cowen, Barry.
  • Crowe, Seán.
  • Doherty, Pearse.
  • Donnelly, Stephen.
  • Dooley, Timmy.
  • Ellis, Dessie.
  • Ferris, Martin.
  • Flanagan, Luke ‘Ming’.
  • Fleming, Sean.
  • Fleming, Tom.
  • Grealish, Noel.
  • Healy, Seamus.
  • Higgins, Joe.
  • Kelleher, Billy.
  • Kitt, Michael P.
  • Mac Lochlainn, Pádraig.
  • McConalogue, Charlie.
  • McDonald, Mary Lou.
  • McGrath, Finian.
  • McGrath, Michael.
  • McLellan, Sandra.
  • Martin, Micheál.
  • Moynihan, Michael.
  • Murphy, Catherine.
  • Ó Caoláin, Caoimhghín.
  • Ó Cuív, Éamon.
  • Ó Fearghaíl, Seán.
  • Ó Snodaigh, Aengus.
  • O’Brien, Jonathan.
  • O’Dea, Willie.
  • Pringle, Thomas.
  • Ross, Shane.
  • Smith, Brendan.
  • Stanley, Brian.
  • Tóibín, Peadar.
  • Wallace, Mick.
Tellers: Tá, Deputies Emmet Stagg and Paul Kehoe; Níl, Deputies Aengus Ó Snodaigh and Seán Ó Fearghaíl.
Question declared carried.

Is the Ceann Comhairle taking questions on promised legislation?

No. Unfortunately, we have gone over time on the Order of Business.

Barr
Roinn