Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Dáil Éireann díospóireacht -
Thursday, 13 Mar 2014

Vol. 834 No. 3

Government's Priorities for the Year Ahead: Statements (Resumed)

I will share time with Deputy Coffey. Another Deputy is due to arrive as well, but I am uncertain.

I thank the Acting Chairman for the opportunity to contribute to this debate. Ireland has moved on much in the three years since the Government came to power, but there is always room for improvement. The Government's plan is to get our country back to work and on track. We are starting to see investment returning to the economy, with many positive job announcements this year. The overall employment levels grew by more than 60,000 in the past 12 months, proof that the Government's jobs strategy is working. During the same period, the private sector added approximately 2,000 jobs. That sector is being supported by the Government's various stimulus plans.

We kept our promise not to raise income tax rates, because a tax on income is a tax on jobs. We defended our corporation tax rate, which is crucial for attracting jobs and investment from abroad. Since entering government, we have worked tirelessly to restore our international reputation. Our now well renowned reputation has helped to bring major job announcements by companies like Google, Mylan, eBay, PayPal, and Irish pharmaceuticals.

Balanced regional development is necessary and we must encourage companies to diversify investment throughout Ireland. I am concerned that many highly educated graduates and members of the trained workforce in the midlands are being abandoned at their greatest hour of need. Some 16,000 people in Longford-Westmeath are waiting for help. They want hope to replace despair by way of a job creation policy for the midlands.

Constructive engagement with the agencies needs to be a feature of the Government's approach to job creation. Social provision is given reluctantly, with every obstacle making the process difficult for claimants. Those who desperately want to return to the workforce find doors closed.

We also need a more visible presence on the international business stage. We have only to consider the Germans, French and British who send their president or prime ministers to sign up new international contracts. We usually send delegations from IDA Ireland and Enterprise Ireland. While they are fine people, they do not have the same political clout as a Head of Government. Our Heads of State and Government must take a more active role in securing contracts and deals for Irish firms. In particular, they must lobby Canada, Russia and other oil-rich countries to garner new business for Irish companies. There must be a greater Government push to ensure that Irish business is supported abroad through our ambassadorial network and political input. Our low corporation tax rate of 12.5% and Ireland as a business-friendly country are the carrots that should be used at every opportunity to encourage companies to locate here.

It is important that basic infrastructure such as roads and essential services be supported and maintained. It is also important that the Government give the green light to the motorway between Mullingar and Rooskey, the most critical piece of infrastructure for the midlands.

We must consider the legislation governing driving instructors. There should be a greater emphasis on showing respect for other road users instead of getting clients over the hurdle of passing tests. When a driver in the US is about to reach disqualification stage, he or she must undertake a training and driving test programme. This is something that should be considered for Ireland, as it would lead to improved driving techniques by careless drivers while giving them a second chance.

I have an issue with the law in a couple of respects. For example, a person in whose name a vehicle is registered may be given penalty points even though he or she can prove that somebody else was driving the car. Even the Taoiseach could get caught on that one. I would also like to see sensible speed limits of greater than 30 km/h on national roads on the outskirts of villages like Rathowen, Ballinalack and Newtownforbes on the N4.

Broadband is vital for the economy of the midlands. Without it, the ability of companies to conduct business in the global marketplace is limited or undermined. Our business sector is suffering from a lack of competitiveness in many parts of the country, particularly the midlands, because we did not introduce broadband on time. Ireland is close to the bottom of an EU league table on broadband availability in schools - we are 20th out of 27 countries. If we do not address this problem now, local rural communities will die as young people leave broadband deserts. Young people in rural Ireland are suffering significant educational disadvantage due to the lack of broadband access. They experience difficulties doing homework and projects due to lack of Internet availability. They are also at a considerable disadvantage socially as they are unable to socialise with friends on websites like Facebook, which can provide a major social outlet for those living in remote areas.

The agri-sector has the capacity to lead the economic recovery, now that it is given proper supports. This Government will invest over €12 billion in Irish agriculture between 2014 and 2020. A total of €8.5 billion will go towards direct payments to farmers, while over €4 billion will go towards rural development. This is a hugely significant development for the agricultural industry and is a record in the history of the State. It is very important for the Irish economy to support our farmers. The Irish family farm is the foundation stone of the rural community and it is driving the rebirth of the agrifood services. Agriculture is at the heart of working life in Longford-Westmeath and while farming had to deal with more than its fair share of setbacks in recent years, farmers in this constituency have displayed great resilience in both dealing with and bouncing back from the effects of the recession. Fine Gael has always had a good record in supporting agriculture, having established the Office of the Agriculture Ombudsman which allows farmers to seek redress. My priority is to ensure this funding is put to the best use to grow and develop the industry based on producing food in a safe and healthy way while protecting the environment.

As a rural Deputy and a farmer myself, I know first hand how important agriculture is to our economy. Funding agriculture in our local communities is a positive investment with long-term economic and social benefits. As the rural development programme is co-financed by the EU, it is important to draw down the maximum funding under Pillar 2. It would make no sense to hand back money to Europe at a time of grave economic difficulty for the farming community and the country. The way to restore our economy is to support our farming community because farmers will build and spend thus helping to drive economic recovery.

I support the timely and efficient payment of farm entitlements. I campaigned for the prompt payments regime now in place. It is important to point out that nothing has been finalised as yet and everything is up for negotiation. I will do my utmost to see that existing schemes are protected and the necessary supports provided under Pillar 2 are included. I am confident the farming community will play a strong and an important role in revitalising the economy. The Government is committed to overcoming the challenges facing the agricultural sector. I want to see a sustainable future for the agricultural community. Providing the best possible education opportunities for young farmers is the key to giving Irish agriculture a competitive advantage in the future.

I call on the Minister to focus on rural job creation. Longford has excellent business premises which would be very attractive to prospective investors. There are at least 50 vacant units around Longford town in the many business parks. I have invited the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation, Deputy Bruton, and the Taoiseach to make a return visit following their visit towards the end of last year. I invite them to send the State agencies to Longford to review these facilities and structures as well as existing businesses in order to highlight and identify the opportunities already in place for job creation and industry in rural counties such as Longford and Westmeath.

The problem of the availability of social housing in Dublin was discussed yesterday. There is no place cheaper for purchasing homes than in the midlands because of the rural renewal scheme that ran on for too long. A home can be purchased at one eighth of the price of a home in Dublin. Consideration should be given to relocating businesses to the midlands. I am sure the Acting Chairman will agree with me.

My indulgence with regard to the Deputy's speaking time would suggest my assent.

I welcome the opportunity to make a contribution on this topic. It is a pity that the Opposition has chosen to vacate the Chamber and not to engage with the Government. Fianna Fáil should listen and learn from its mistakes and the damage it has done to this country.

In February 2011, when this Government took office, the deficit of €20 billion was lumbered on the backs of the Irish people. The country was haemorrhaging 1,600 jobs per week, our international reputation was in tatters and our economic sovereignty was lost. A total of 460,000 people were unemployed, existing businesses were struggling and losing competitiveness, with debt levels out of control. The banking system was insolvent, credit had dried up and emigration was rampant. The construction sector was decimated. There was a real risk at that time that our essential social services, including education, health and social welfare, would collapse. That is the legacy of the Fianna Fáil-led Government in 2011. I am glad to say that I am part of a Government that faced up to its responsibilities and took on its shoulders the responsibility of the mandate from the Irish people. We were faced with an unprecedented disastrous situation. Difficult choices had to be made to stabilise the economy, to restore our international reputation, to cut the deficit and to bring our public finances under control, to recover our economy and to create job opportunities and growth.

I thank the people for their resilience in staying the course in the difficult times. They deserve great credit for the progress that has been made. The small and medium enterprises and employers who have traded through these difficult times deserve great credit. They have sacrificed much but they have proven again that Irish resilience and fight-back can work. We are now beginning to see the first signs of recovery.

The options for the Government to work through this process were developed gradually and it has been a difficult period. I am a backbench Deputy who supports the Government I have supported difficult budgets but the signs of recovery are visible. The levels of employment are rising as unemployment figures are reducing. The Government has stabilised the economy and brought the public finances under control.

I agree with previous speakers who have referred to balanced regional development. I welcome my colleague, the Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government, Deputy Phil Hogan, from the south-east region, who shares many of my concerns with regard to balanced regional development. There has been a debate about issues such as the housing crisis and rental problems in the Dublin area. Dublin as the capital city is the first city to come out of the recession but property prices are rising as a consequence. I hope they will never rise to the same heights of previous years because housing and rents must be affordable. The answer lies in balanced regional development.

I come from Waterford in the south-east region where the unemployment rates are particularly high, if not the highest in the country. There needs to be a focus on delivering essential services and jobs to those regions by the Departments and agencies. I refer to the regional aid programme which is due to be reviewed.

In the period 2007 to 2013, regional aid for large companies in the south east was 10%, while for similar companies in the BMW region it was 15%. For medium firms, the rate was 20%, compared with 25% for the BMW region. Likewise, while smaller firms elsewhere received 30% aid, those in the BMW region were allocated aid of 35%. The statistics clearly show that high unemployment rates in specific areas require a review and rebalancing of regional aid in favour of the regions that are under serious economic pressure. The south east is one of those regions.

I am calling on the Government to review the regional aid programme and, in its submission to Europe, to ensure an increase in the allocation of regional aid to Waterford and the south east. We must have an equal playing field and an opportunity for new businesses to be established in that region to address the unemployment problem there. Other issues that need to be addressed in respect of the south east include regional infrastructure, a university for the region, provision of a fibre telecommunications cable, safeguarding of essential services and a greater focus from IDA Ireland and Enterprise Ireland.

We have an opportunity now to grasp the opportunities and potential that are out there, but it must be done in a fair and equitable way. Balanced regional development is the best way forward for the country as a whole.

I welcome the opportunity to contribute to this debate. It is helpful to recall the situation that pertained when this Government assumed office three years and two days ago. There was no confidence among people in this country at that time. There was no confidence in the banking system. On the international stage, confidence in and respect for Ireland was at an all-time low. In short, we were at our lowest ebb. I assume many colleagues were of the same view as me at that time, namely, that we might not survive. I very much doubted that it was possible to survive, without major social upheaval, in the type of climate into which the Government was then facing.

I take this opportunity to congratulate the Taoiseach, Tánaiste and other Ministers on their execution of what amounts to an economic miracle in the shortest possible time. It was due to the huge efforts of individual Ministers and the example they were shown by the leaders of the two parties in government that we have achieved such success. The Government was facing an impossible task, with no confidence among people in this country that anything could be done. As Deputy Coffey has pointed out, the numbers of unemployed were increasing on a daily basis. Everything was on a downward trajectory and, as a result, our standing in the international arena was seriously damaged. The leaders of the two parties in government and their Ministers set about the impossible task they faced with no support from the Opposition. The negativity from the other side of the House was in evidence from the very beginning. Individual Ministers were targeted and addressed in the House in a derogatory fashion, and the quality of the debate directed at them was appalling at the best of times.

Despite all this, the Government has prevailed. It is usual in this country for very little credit to be given to those who take on the impossible task and succeed, and we are seeing the proof of that now. An all-out effort is being made to downgrade the achievements of the Government. We have had smears and sneers from all sides as an attempt is made to convince the public that nothing has been done. In fact, a great deal has been done to drag this country out of the depths and put it back on the map once again. That achievement is down to the Herculean efforts of every Minister in this Government every single day since their appointment. Their performance is in stark contrast to that of the outgoing Government, where Ministers ran away from their responsibilities and some did not even know what was happening. That Government washed its hands of the situation it had created, with Ministers happy to walk away and leave it to the Irish people and the incoming Government to take responsibility.

Great credit is due to the people of this country, in both the public and private sectors, for the huge sacrifices they have had to make and the massive burden they have borne. I agree with Deputy Coffey that the Irish people deserve all praise for taking up that challenge presented to them and sticking with it. They proved that given leadership and inspiration, they could achieve greatness, and so they did. That greatness was our survival, against all the odds and when all of the indications suggested we could not. International financiers did not expect us to survive. Europeans in general believed we would not survive. Everybody took the view that our economy was a basket case. Fortunately, the Government and the people have prevailed and we are on the road to recovery.

It is important to recall the huge sacrifices made by people right across the public sector. Every employee has suffered massively as a result of cuts, not at the discretion of the Government but necessitated by the lunatic policies pursued by its predecessor. There are those who claim to have seen the collapse coming, but they did not articulate at the time what they now claim to have been obvious. It certainly is true, however, that as far back as 2002 and 2003, the writing was on the wall for anybody who wanted to read it. The problem was that the Government at the time was having too much fun. We were all aboard a carousel and the Government could do not wrong. Emissaries were coming here from Brussels on a weekly basis inquiring as to how we were keeping the economy going. It was all down to social partnership, they were told. In fact, social partnership was the death knell for the economy because no regard was had in that process for issues like competitiveness. It was all about buying off anybody who had a problem, which certainly solved the first problem but also created an even larger one. As I said, the sacrifices made by the public sector have been huge. I hope in the time ahead that those workers will be able to bask a little in the reflected glory of what has been achieved.

Workers in the private sector, meanwhile, were the first casualties of the crash. The huge job losses Deputy Coffey referred to took place in the space of one year or less. Everything went downhill and everybody was looking at their neighbours and wondering who was going to be next. We have not yet worked through all the problems we inherited from that period, but a great deal of work has been done. The catastrophe endured by private sector workers did at least serve to let our European colleagues know that the economy was not at all that it had been made out to be. The so-called boom period was not really a boom, but merely a bubble or glass shell. When the cracks came, they came immediately and with huge consequences for every sector.

Deputy Coffey referred to education and health, two crucial sectors in any society. The Opposition likes to remind us of promises that were made by the incoming Government. All I can say is that the only promise I or anybody around me made, given the situation in which we found ourselves, was to do our best to ensure the country's survival and safeguard core services. That was all we had to do. This Government had only one thing to do, namely, to pull the country back from the brink. Our job was to offer people courage and some type of inspiration. In order to ensure the country's survival, the Government had a responsibility to take the right decisions, some of which were very difficult.

The Department of Finance and the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform were the two crucial Departments in driving forward that effort. The Opposition hoped those two Ministers would not last six months, that the country would come down around their ears and they would never be seen again. The Opposition was disappointed. The Ministers set about their task in an objective and constructive way and they did the right thing. They were responsible for the future of the country, not concerned for their own gratification, and all credit is due to them. The same applies to the Taoiseach and Tánaiste. No other party leaders in government during my time in this House - it is not today or yesterday I came here - have done so much to inspire the people and have stuck together so well in doing so.

A Department of which I have some knowledge from a previous existence, the Department of Social Protection, deals with what is obviously a very sensitive area in difficult times with a high level of unemployment. All credit is due to the Minister for Social Protection, Deputy Joan Burton. Hers was a very difficult task. The Opposition Members howled with glee when they believed she was in difficulty from time to time. Its members rubbed their hands and hoped the end was in sight and that the people would embrace them once again and call on them to lead them to the promised land. The Minister was not in any way put off. She stuck to her job and did so very well. She would admit herself it was an extraordinarily difficult task in the circumstances.

Let us consider the Department of the Environment, Community and Local Government, its Minister, Deputy Phil Hogan, and his colleagues. Their job was to restore the country's water infrastructure under its remit that had been neglected for approximately 20 years. Nothing had been done about it. When the current Government took office, all kinds of foreign bodies and matter were floating in the drinking water supply in parts of the country. There was a concerted campaign by people on the other side of the House, who must have gone out to inspect the septic tanks because they are not present, to undermine the necessary efforts of the Government to provide vital infrastructure in keeping with 21st-century requirements and put us on a competitive footing with states throughout the EU and globally. All credit is due to the Minister, Deputy Hogan, and his colleagues for their work and sacrifices, bearing in mind the abuse they have taken in their effort to put in place the foundations of what will be of benefit to the people.

The Minister for Health, Deputy Reilly, was criticised daily. It is amazing that it has been possible to maintain health services to the extent to which they have been maintained, with fewer staff, less money and a greater throughput of patients. The Minister and his Ministers of State have got no credit for it, nor do they expect to get credit. However, it is important that they stick to their task and try to deliver the goods so as to have continuity of service. The people depend on the decisions made now for the future. Despite all the hassle and abuse concerning developments in health service over recent years, the service has survived. In this regard, one must acknowledge the work of a committed group of people working internally in the service. Despite this work, all we hear is criticism about private insurance costs and claims we will all be unable to pay for insurance next year, etc. The Minister remained and remains committed.

With regard to education, I have referred already to the efforts made. When the Government came into power, it was asked whether the Minister would be able to deliver and maintain the services and contain the demand throughout the country at the same time as operating within budget. He did so and has done an outstanding job.

Housing has been mentioned very often in recent days. For those of us who continue to work on the ground - our number is diminishing - it was quite obvious from five to ten years ago that we were heading towards a housing crisis, as the Acting Chairman, Deputy Wall, well knows. It was clear that the efforts being made to address the issue were nil. What happened was that the previous Administration decided it was not going to provide any public authority housing at all and that all housing would be provided privately in the future. It argued this was the correct approach but we now are where we are. Some 100,000 families are on local authority waiting lists. The current Government is now being urged to build houses and it is argued we should have done so in three years. The previous Government was doing nothing only looking at the problem for 15 years. The only thing it did in the 15 years was count the number on the waiting list twice. It discovered that if one counts often enough, the number shrinks of its own accord because people change address, and some people are not recorded.

Let me proceed to energy and communications, for which the Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources, Deputy Rabbitte, is responsible. He has done an excellent job, and has set about providing the future foundation for the country in a fundamental way that will be of benefit to the people, whose population will have increased in ten, 15 or 20 years. This job was important.

Agriculture and transport comprise two areas in which the two relevant Ministers have been spectacularly successful, even given the restrictions that obtain in the current climate. They should be congratulated on it.

I wish to proceed to the sensitive area of job creation. When the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation, Deputy Richard Bruton, took over responsibility in this area, there was no hope or possibility of achieving anything. The future looked dim and gloomy, in which fact the Opposition rejoiced. It knew what this was like and it allowed it to happen, sadly. I congratulate the Minister.

The Minister for Children and Youth Affairs, Deputy Frances Fitzgerald, has a new Department. She is the first Minister with responsibility for children and youth in the history of the State. Hers has been a great achievement and she is to be congratulated on her success to date.

I want to make a point on the most recent crises, which seem to arise daily. The Minister for Justice and Equality, as with every other Minister, entered office in an extraordinarily difficult economic time but has managed to keep the service going. That was a huge challenge. He has managed to rise to it with the support of his colleagues in government, and he continues to do so.

I have never seen such politicisation of An Garda Síochána in my time in this House. Any time I witnessed politicisation in the past, I became alert and worried about where we were heading. If, as time unfolds, we politicise the police force, we will do a very dangerous thing and go in a very difficult direction.

I am so sad and sorry for those absent members of the Opposition who have been so eloquent and condemnatory in the debate over the past week. They have found nothing positive to say about anything but that is their problem. Negativity is the business and game in which they indulge. It is negativity for purely political purposes and nothing else. It does not achieve a whole lot. If three years ago the Government had been as negative as the Opposition is now, we would be worse off than when we started.

In the dying days of the last Fianna Fáil coalition, the country was facing a crisis that had significant political, economic and social consequences. Many effects of the crisis will be felt for generations. People will remember the convoy of Mercedes cars making their way towards Farmleigh. Each of the then Ministers had a few words to say, not realising that, in the eyes of the people watching, their behaviour indicated a Government that was arrogant and completely out of touch with the crisis they faced.

Many who were Members at the time in question will have met the European Commissioner, Mr. Olli Rehn. One of the messages the Commissioner took from his visit to Ireland was that the then Government, run by Fianna Fáil, had completely and utterly lost the trust of the Irish people. It was only a few short weeks later that Mr. Ajai Chopra crossed the road from the Merrion Hotel to the Department of Finance, putting an end to an era that was very sad for the people of Ireland.

There are many members of Fianna Fáil and other members of the Opposition who want to confine the period in question to history. It is not historic, however, because it lives with us every single day. There are far too many citizens in mortgage arrears and negative equity and those who will be making mortgage repayments with much-reduced incomes. The many people in question are in both the public and private sectors and are deeply unhappy with what has happened to them. Therefore, the fallout from the crisis is not historic, it is with us day in and day out.

There is also a State mortgage that has been heaped on all of us who are still working and our children. This State mortgage, which has been used to pay back the loans we took out to preserve our banks, is the equivalent each year of the universal social charge. This is another penal tax that was landed on the people and it is being used to pay back a loan that was essentially taken out to pay for the banking crisis - a loan heaped on the people by the previous Government. This is not historical. Everything to do with that State mortgage and our own mortgages has been as a consequence of some extremely bad planning by the previous Government.

Three years later we are in a better place. We no longer talk about being thrown out of the euro or becoming a default nation. People are backing and investing in Ireland, both from outside coming in through foreign direct investment, investing in the assets and structures of Ireland, and from within the country with people starting to invest again in the confidence that there is a future for themselves and their families in this country.

We will never forget the sacrifices made by all citizens of this country. Their sacrifice has been as great as that made by the citizens 100 years ago when the country gained its independence. We must now acknowledge that the economy has stabilised to a degree.

Some remarks were particularly insulting, including Deputy Ó Cuív's claim that no new jobs had been formed in this country. That is deeply insulting to the 68,000 who have come off the unemployment register and are now working. They are contributing to society and to their families. These are real figures and these are real jobs. Deputy Ó Cuív was wrong to make such a statement in the House.

Anybody who reads anything about economics and economic recovery will know that a country needs to stabilise its economy before seeing significant reductions in unemployment. One of the great achievements of the past three years is that we have not just stabilised our economy and are coming out of the crisis and starting on the road to recovery, but in tandem we have also reduced unemployment, which does not usually happen. That shows the importance of the Government putting a clear focus on jobs when it was restabilising the economy and getting things right.

There is a continuing need to focus on other social aspects as part of the recovery. We have got the economy right and done much of the heavy lifting in order to stabilise our taxes and expenditure. It is now time to focus on the social aspect of our society and economy. Many people have spoken about the current housing crisis, a very serious issue that must be dealt with.

We need to invest in education because the strength of our educational systems in the past got us out of many of the previous recessions that have struck the country. I am particularly concerned that for the first time no Irish third level institution is ranked in the top 100 universities in the world. University College Dublin and Trinity College Dublin were traditionally in the top 100 and I believe that Trinity College Dublin only dropped out of the top 100 this year. It is important that we make the investment to have our universities back in the top 100, which is incredibly important for our international reputation. We have always had a strong reputation for our doctors, engineers, postgraduates and PhD students. It is important that we retake the high ground in regard to the status of our universities and do so quickly.

Another incredibly important social service, which will come into focus considerably more now that we are working our way out of the economic crisis, is the health services. The health services continue to need more reform - the job has not been done there. Universal health insurance is not an option at present because so much needs to happen beforehand to improve the effectiveness of our health services and to improve the delivery of health care. The new hospital groups must reorganise much faster than is happening. There must be a change in how we deliver services and it must come much quicker.

There is a non-consultant hospital doctor and a consultant crisis in our hospitals at the moment. This crisis is more acute when we consider hospitals outside the major urban areas, but it is a crisis that is coming to the hospitals in our major urban areas. It is a crisis that has developed over the past two decades and needs particular focus. We do not need to leave it get to the point where the recovery could take as long as it has taken for us to end up in this situation in our health services.

The current GP contract has created major controversy. As a GP, I have an interest in what is happening and I understand it quite well. I find some of the sections far too vague at the moment to be accepted and taken seriously. Some sections interfere with the normal doctor-patient relationship and will need to be significantly renegotiated. Many GPs have found some the language to be deeply offensive to people who provide an excellent service.

I am glad that the Minister of State, Deputy White, has committed to a speedy negotiation of the contract because primary care is working very well at the moment. However, we need a new structure for the new century. We need to move away from the acute illness based structure of our primary care services and to look at the chronic care management programmes that are far more important. Many GPs are already doing what we are trying to get from the new GP contract, but it is not part of their contract and we must formalise these structures better. That is where the focus of the negotiations should be because it is about protecting patients in the 21st century.

I would like to see the development of a patient safety authority. We have had a number of crises and seen how patients are treated. Many improvements in how services are delivered have been made in recent years. HIQA has improved standards. The Medical Council is working efficiently in introducing competence assurance programmes for doctors. The Government has done much to protect many of the institutions of the State as we have gone through this crisis. In order to protect patients we need a proper patient safety authority with real power, along the lines of the Mental Health Commission. Patients who suffer mental illness are far better protected in the health services than patients who suffer from other illnesses or have other concerns to raise.

We must commend the Government on the extraordinary work it has done in the past three years. We must commend the people on what they have achieved despite the sacrifices they have made. We should be grateful we have such strong institutions in the State, including our schools, Civil Service, Garda and Army. People respect what they do and they respect being Irish people and being members of the Irish nation. I am glad we are now back to being responsible for our destiny.

It is well documented that this Government inherited a basket case of an economy and in the past three years we have made significant progress in addressing this. The previous Fianna Fáil-Green Party Government was an embarrassment nationally and internationally. In the last few months of its term of office, Ministers did not even turn up to events at home and abroad. They threw in the towel and abandoned their democratic responsibility to our State and its people. They let everybody down and people have not forgotten the consequences of their political abdication.

One of the key planks of the progress that has been made in the past three years has been in the area of job creation. We have reduced the unemployment figures but we must do much better. Our medium-term economic strategy sets the objective of reducing unemployment to below the eurozone average this year and to below 10% by 2016.

For my part, the Department of the Environment, Community and Local Government is playing a key role in implementing the programme for Government and I am happy to report that we have made significant progress in delivering on the broad range of actions for which my Department is responsible. As Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government, I have implemented the largest programme of reform since the early 1960s.

There is real evidence that our hard work is bearing fruit and making an important contribution to economic and physical regeneration, social and community development and environmental protection. I have led an extremely ambitious programme of reform since coming to office, with a major focus on strengthening our democratic system, improving the environment and ensuring effective and efficient services for the public. We have put people first.

As a key goal of the local government reform programme, I want to see local authorities as the key drivers of local enterprise, and this will be done by the establishment of local enterprise offices. These offices will contribute to national recovery through the timely delivery of our policies and programmes, especially in support of job creation. I look forward to the establishment in April of local enterprise offices to provide strengthened support to microenterprises through local authorities, where they will respond to national enterprise and employment initiatives by providing local support.

The Action Programme for Effective Local Government, published in October 2012, set out Government policy for a range of reform measures, including the establishment of local enterprise offices, in regard to the structures, functions, funding, governance and operational aspects of local government. The legislation providing for much of the reform programme is now in place with the enactment of the Local Government Reform Act 2014, which was completed in January of this year. This will deliver a much more streamlined system, with the number of local authorities reducing from 114 to 31 at this year's local elections and with the number of councillors down from over 1,600 to 949. New governance arrangements will apply under which elected members will have more powers in terms of policy development and will be better positioned to oversee the implementation of policy by the executive, delivering improved outcomes on the ground for the people. Local government will have a wider and clear role in regard to economic development, including the adoption of regional spatial and economic strategies, to which all relevant agencies will be required to subscribe.

Provisions to enable the holding of elections to the new councils on 23 May have already been brought into force and phased commencement of other provisions of the Act and formulation of related regulations, orders and guidance to give effect to specific measures is proceeding apace. A key element of this will involve a renewed focus on local government performance, particularly through the establishment of a new national oversight and audit commission. As well as modernising structures, the reform Act strengthens local government functions in some very important areas, particularly economic and community development. When the new structures are bedded down, I will be recommencing a rigorous programme of engagement with other Departments and agencies to initiate a substantial programme of devolution of further functions to local government. Meanwhile, to maintain the momentum towards greater devolution, the Government recently agreed a procedure for "local government proofing" of all future proposals for public service functions at local level, which will ensure that local government is the default option for governance and public service at local level.

The Gateway scheme is now starting to build towards a critical mass. The purpose of the scheme, in conjunction with the Minister for Social Protection, Deputy Joan Burton, is to allow the long-term unemployed to make a contribution locally and, at the same time, learn some new skills. It is not to mask the unemployment figures, as some on the Opposition benches are snidely suggesting. By the end of this year, we hope to have 3,000 long-term unemployed people complementing existing local authority staffing resources. These people will learn new skills, which should contribute to their employability into the future.

The programme of assistance agreed between the Government and the EU-ECB-IMF required the Government to introduce domestic water charges. In the programme, the Government promised to introduce a fair funding model to deliver clean and reliable water, establish a new State-owned utility to take responsibility for water infrastructure, and implement a metering programme and water charging system based on usage above a free allowance. The Government has made significant progress on these commitments. On 1 January this year, Irish Water became the national water services authority. Significant progress has also been made on the roll-out domestic water metering programme which, together with the establishment of the Commission for Energy Regulation, CER, as the independent economic regulator for the water sector, will help to underpin the new sustainable financial model for water services into the future. To date, we have installed approximately 140,000 meters and in excess of 1,000 people are currently employed on the installation programme.

While the dedication and commitment of the local authorities and their staff in delivering water services was never in question, and although some on the Opposition benches wrongly sought to denigrate their contribution in the provision of water and sewerage services over the years, it was nonetheless clear there was requirement for reform of the delivery structures. The system lacked economies of scale. For example, the operating expenditure per connection was more than twice the average of UK water companies. Capital investment on water infrastructure needs to increase, as we see in today's EPA report, which suggests a sizeable additional capital investment is required to bring us up to the necessary standards that will prevent the European Commission from taking this country to court again on many occasions in the future, as it did in the past in regard to groundwater quality.

At an early stage of establishing the public water utility, we commissioned PricewaterhouseCoopers to carry out an assessment on which model should be used in order to set up Irish Water. The assessment assumed annual investment level requirements of €600 million per annum. In 2014, Irish Water will invest some €310 million in core water services infrastructure, which will create and sustain up to 3,000 jobs.

CER recently outlined its timetable for the approval of water charges. In April, it will undertake public consultations on a range of issues, including domestic and non-domestic tariff structures. In August, it will announce its final decision on the approved level of domestic and non-domestic water charges. Irish Water will commence charging domestic customers from October next and the first bills will issue from January 2015. This is the source of income that will be required to repay the loans that will be achieved on the financial markets in the future in order to pay for the additional capital investment that will be urgently required in order to create job opportunities and in the interests of public health.

Since taking office, the Government has introduced radical and significant reforms to the operation and financing of the political system. The Electoral Act 2011 allowed for a reduction in the number of Deputies, which will result in 158 being elected at the next general election compared to 166 in the 2011 election. The Act also provided that the writ for Dáil by-elections must now be issued within six months of the vacancy occurring. The spending limit for candidates at Presidential elections will be reduced from €1.3 million to €750,000 and the maximum reimbursement payment to candidates for Presidential elections will be reduced from €260,000 to €200,000.

The Electoral (Amendment) (Political Funding) Act 2012 brought into force restrictions on corporate donations, considerable reductions in the maximum amount that a political party or an individual can accept as a political donation, reductions in donation reporting thresholds and a ban on the receipt of all cash donations over €200. The Act introduced a new requirement that to qualify for full State funding, provided to political parties under the Electoral Act 1997, a qualifying political party must have at least 30% women candidates and at least 30% men candidates at the next Dáil general election, and this will rise to 40% after seven years. If a party does not meet these thresholds, its funding will be halved.

Constituency and local electoral area boundaries have been reviewed and revised for local, European and Dáil elections, which will improve the representational balance across the country for all elections. We are continuing with our busy programme of reform in this area. Last month, I published for consultation the general scheme of the Seanad Electoral (University Members) (Amendment) Bill, which provides for the election of the six university Senators to be more democratic. This will include the provisions that were already approved by the people in a referendum in 1979.

Turning now to the community area, the local and community development programme, LCDP, is the largest national social inclusion support programme of its kind in the State. It provides employment, training, personal development and capacity building supports for the harder to reach in the most disadvantaged areas in our communities. The successor LCDP is at design stage. The current programme is being implemented on a transitional basis for 2014 and all contract holders operating within the programme through the local development companies will continue to the end of this year. There will be seamless transition to the new LCDP committees of local authorities and communities at the beginning of 2015. As an integral part of the alignment process, the management and oversight of the LCDP will transfer within each local authority, initially from 1 July this year as an oversight measure, and in terms of the management and operation of the programme from 1 January 2015. I want to assure the local development companies that, in regard to the 1,650 people who are employed in those companies at present, even though they are private companies, the financial allocation of €48 million this year should be sufficient for them to continue with most of that employment in the context of the financial resources available to them, and in view of the fact they have to make decisions as private companies as to whether they have sufficient resources for administration, or not, as the case may be.

The LCDP will require tendering in future, so we will have to change this mechanism. Following legal advice from the Attorney General, we are now obliged to tender for these programmes in order to comply with competition law.

The Leader programme, on which negotiations are taking place at present with the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform for the next seven-year programme, does not need to be tendered. However, we will have to see what resources are available in regard to that programme to ensure we have a rural development programme at local level that is operated effectively and efficiently, and in the interests of maximising the amount of money that will go to projects and front-line services rather than administration.

I want to place local government as the main vehicle of governance and public service at local level, including at social and community development level. Better alignment of local government and local development will achieve a more joined-up approach to service delivery at local level. The Local Government Reform Act 2014 provides the legislative basis for the alignment, including the establishment of local community development committees and the preparation and implementation of local economic and community plans. LCDCs will be established in each local authority area. They will have oversight and planning responsibility for local development and community programmes in their area. They will have a democratic mandate because they will be reporting to the local authority members elected on 23 May 2014. We have already established some front-runner, as it were, LCDCs in a number of local authority areas and will learn from those experiences to ensure we have the best possible structures in place that will include the community and local government sector working together on behalf of the people and in respect of all the projects at local level.

The Leader programme for 2007 to 2013 was valued at €375 million. The finalisation of negotiations is ongoing and we expect to have agreement in the next six weeks. In the last programme, 5% of the Common Agricultural Policy moneys were allocated for the purpose of the rural development programme. The Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food and I have got agreement through negotiations that the initial amount of money to be delivered through Leader will be 7% or €153 million. There was an opportunity in the negotiations with the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform for some co-financing to top up that amount for the next seven years. My Department will seek expressions of interest to develop and submit local development strategies in respect of Leader in autumn of this year. It is expected that the process of selecting suitable local development strategies for implementation through Leader will take place over the second half of this year and early 2015, with commencement shortly thereafter in early to mid-2015.

Our environment is a key national resource which requires protection, and I have led significant improvements at national level and during our EU Presidency at international level. My Department published a comprehensive waste management policy, entitled A Resource Opportunity, in July 2012. The policy provides for a focus on resource efficiency as a critical element in a holistic waste policy. The emphasis is on prevention of waste in the first instance and the resource potential available within our various waste streams. By not generating waste, we can eliminate the need to handle, transport, treat and dispose of it and thereby avoid having to pay for these services. We will continue to drive waste reduction through the existing producer responsibility initiatives and the development of new compliance schemes.

A number of important commitments under the new waste policy have been delivered on already, for example, new household food waste regulations and the establishment of the three new waste management planning regions. Continued roll-out of the waste policy is a primary focus for 2014. This year, I will introduce a new regulatory regime to improve the regulation of household waste collection.

There is major growth and jobs potential in the composting and anaerobic digestion area. To tap into that potential and to support the development of indigenous bio-waste treatment capacity, brown bin collection services will be provided to more households this year on a phased basis, with roll-out to population centres greater than 10,000 persons. This will enable households to reduce their waste collection costs and reduce the quantity of waste sent to landfill. I will continue to focus on improving the quality of our environment through the remediation of legal and illegal legacy landfill sites throughout the country, the development of new structures to provide for enhanced enforcement of waste legislation by local authorities and the Environmental Protection Agency, and the exploring of ways in which the existing enforcement regime can be made more responsive with a greater use of fixed payment notices, as used in respect of littering.

In 2012, my Department introduced a once-off litter enforcement grants scheme, targeted specifically at the issue of fly tipping and small-scale illegal dumping and encouraging local authorities to enhance their existing enforcement activities through measures such as the purchase of CCTV equipment to allow for the effective monitoring of known litter blackspots. I launched a national campaign in conjunction with Fáilte Ireland, local authorities and the EPA that was supported by the print media to highlight the economic value of our environment and encourage the public to report all incidences of illegal dumping to the EPA's national environmental complaints hotline.

In June 2012, we ratified the Aarhus Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters. This involved introducing a number of pieces of legislation to assist Ireland in meeting its obligations under the convention. In respect of environmental infringements or court cases with which we are threatened by the European Commission before the European Court of Justice, I inherited a situation where 31 cases against Ireland were brought before the European Court of Justice in 2010. These have been reduced to nine open environmental infringement cases. This is the type of concerted effort we have been making over the past three years to ensure Ireland complies with European Commission rulings and European Court of Justice judgments, unlike our predecessors who ignored rulings and judgments in respect of septic tanks and groundwater, costing the taxpayer €2.7 million. By reducing the number of infringements, we are saving the taxpayer a lot of money as well as protecting our environment.

Climate change remains an issue which will continue to present challenges for us all for decades to come. In the context of sustainable development, I will maintain progressive development of national policy and legislation in response to climate change. Recognising both the challenges and opportunities of a low carbon future, the Government is developing a high level national vision on transition to a low carbon, climate resilient and environmentally sustainable economy by 2050. In parallel, we will continue to work on progressing national greenhouse gas mitigation through the ongoing low carbon roadmapping process. Following through on the national climate change adaptation framework, we will also continue to maximise the operational dimension through sectoral and local adaptation planning. The spatial planning process provides an established means through which to implement and integrate climate change objectives at local level. Local development planning will become the mechanism for delivery of local climate adaptation action. I met the Commissioner for Climate Action, Connie Hedegaard, last week and emphasised to her that the effort-sharing arrangements of 2008, when the previous Government was asleep at the wheel in respect of the burden on Ireland, will not be repeated on this occasion in the context of climate change negotiations and that agriculture and land use must be seen as providing food security for the people of Europe and the world rather than as a soft touch in respect of climate change policy.

A range of challenges were left for this Government to deal with in the wake of the economic crisis, including in the areas of housing and planning. We have made considerable progress in dealing with legacy issues like Priory Hall, pyrite and unfinished estates. I compliment the Minister of State, Deputy Jan O'Sullivan, on the progress she has made and her co-operation in many of the important areas of building control and outdated building regulatory practices.

I am proud of what this Government and my Department have achieved to date, particularly in the transformation of the political structures and the provision of services to the people. With the forthcoming local elections, people will have the opportunity to elect representatives to new and more efficient local authorities. They will be better able to access services which will be delivered in a more efficient manner. I believe I have put in place the necessary first steps in ensuring sustainable recovery, the development of thriving community and local government sectors and an environment of which we can all be proud. The progress to date has been made through a co-operative approach with central and local government working together with agencies and communities. This spirit of shared ambition for our country will help deliver on the objectives of this Government's challenging programme. We will continue to implement the necessary and difficult measures that are needed to restore our economic prosperity, particularly for the people who require jobs. Nobody in this Government could be satisfied to inherit an appalling political and economic legacy. Equally, members of this Government are angry at having to impose severe financial pain on families and businesses arising from the policies of our predecessors. The people are very mature. They realise that difficult decisions were and are necessary to deliver for the best interests of the country in the long term.

The next speaker is Deputy Pat Deering who is sharing time with Deputies Anthony Lawlor, Damien English, Tony McLoughlin and John Paul Phelan.

Like a number of my colleagues, I was elected to this House for the first time just over three years ago and am honoured to be here. In the 2011 general election, the main issue on which we campaigned was trying to fix the economy. We were given a mandate as a party of Government to fix the economy. We faced a number of other issues as well. The famous five-point plan was used regularly. The number one issue was fixing the economy, the second issue was jobs, the third issue was reform, the fourth issue was health and the fifth issue was the banking sector.

Three years ago, as we all know, this economy was in rag order, mainly due to the neglect caused by 14 years of inept government. The troika had been brought in, we had lost our sovereignty, and for the second time in my short lifetime, the country was bankrupt. Where are we now three years later? There is no doubt we are in a more solid and stable place than we were three years ago. The troika has gone and we are back in business on our own terms. We no longer need stabilisers to give us any assistance. No one could dispute that we are in a better state.

We still have a long way to go but we have made substantial progress in stabilising the economy, which is the important issue.

Our second priority during the election was the creation of jobs. Despite the fact that we hear the Opposition's daily rhetoric about the type of jobs that are being created, some 61,000 jobs have been created in the last year which is a substantial number. That is 1,200 jobs per week compared to losing 1,700 jobs per week during the time of the previous Government. Those 61,000 positions are real jobs but there are still far too many people unemployed and far too many people have emigrated. We need to get those people back into country again and back on the workforce. It is a key issue to get those people back to work as quickly as possible.

Even though 61,000 jobs have been created, we need to get more jobs back into rural areas. In my own area of Carlow, for example, I was disappointed to learn that we have had only seven IDA Ireland site visits in the past three years. Regional areas need to be recognised more substantially in future. One good thing that the Celtic tiger left us was the country's good road network, so Ireland does not finish at Newlands Cross anymore. It is necessary to get more foreign direct investment down the country, even though I realise it can be difficult to do so.

In his speech, the Minister mentioned the new local enterprise offices, or LEOs, which constitute a positive move. They should be efficiently resourced, however. While I do not wish to be parochial about the matter, in my own area of Carlow I understand that a minimum of three Enterprise Ireland employees are needed in these LEOs. Carlow has only two such employees at the moment and an extra one has been sought for a while. It is important that every LEO should be on the same footing so that every area will have an equal advantage in terms of job creation.

Jobs are important in rural Ireland and nowhere more so than in Carlow which has a high unemployment rate. Two main industries which have left the area in the past ten years have not been replaced. It is a crying shame that the sugar factory and sugar beet industry have left our shores. The Acting Chairman, Deputy Wall, has a lot of knowledge in that regard. The closure of the sugar factory in Carlow affected not just the local area, but also hauliers and others who were indirectly affected. At its peak, the Braun Oral-B factory employed 1,100 people. Those industries need to be replaced, so I would encourage the Government to ensure that we have as much foreign direct investment as possible.

Agriculture is a key area of employment. In the so-called Celtic tiger years, agriculture was not highly thought of. Bricks and mortar have now been replaced by agriculture and it is sexy again to talk about the agri-sector. Much work has been done in that regard over the past three years. Last year alone we had substantial exports in that sector of over €10 billion. In addition, the Common Agricultural Policy has been renegotiated with a €12.5 billion stimulus package coming into this country in the coming period. While CAP has been important, there are challenges ahead which need to be negotiated in order to try to achieve the full Harvest 2020 targets.

I wish to bring to the Ministers' attention the relationship between large multiple retailers and primary producers. It is a subject that has been dealt with extensively by the Joint Committee on Agriculture, Food and the Marine. That area needs to be addressed in the short term, so I would encourage the Government to introduce the consumer and competition Bill as soon as possible. That legislation will provide for a statutory code of conduct for the retail industry. We should have an independent arbitrator to ensure that the sector is streamlined and works properly.

As the Minister rightly said, on 23 May we will have the biggest reform of local government in the history of the State, which is welcome. In addition, Dáil reform needs to move on further, despite the fact that we have Leaders' Questions on Thursdays, Topical Issue debates, Friday sittings and longer sitting hours. The Oireachtas committee system is essential and does much valuable work. However, the idea of having to run back and forth from committees to the Dáil Chamber must be addressed. I propose that we should have a committee week once a month whereby the committees would report to the Dáil at the end of that particular week. We could thus do away with moving back and forth from the Chamber to the committees. Members who sit on a number of committees would have an opportunity to contribute to all of them. The Government should examine that proposal.

The Order of Business in this House also needs to be examined. It is farcical for Members to ask what is happening concerning forthcoming legislation, even though they have the details in front of them. Such matters could be dealt with by a letter to the Ceann Comhairle because at present it is a waste of time. Everybody should have an opportunity to use the valuable time here to raise as many issues as possible.

We should also consider reforming the Whip system, even though it has operated thus for many years. However, we should first consider reforming the committee system where valuable work is done, but everybody should be on the same wavelength.

The recent statements on the Government's priorities for the year ahead are valuable in setting out a stall outlining what has been done in the past three years and also what needs to be done during the next couple of years.

I am glad to have an opportunity to speak on this matter. The Minister must be used to the fact that he never sees any Opposition Deputies here when there is good news to be announced. The good news began yesterday for St. Patrick's weekend with the "Inspire Ireland" video. It has currently gone viral on YouTube. We must build on the success we have had as a result of the last three budgets. There has been no increase in income tax, which the Government promised when it came into office. In addition, we did not touch any core social welfare payments.

Ireland was the first country to successfully exit from the bailout. In addition, we did a deal on the promissory note exchanging it for long-term government bonds, and economic growth has increased. Recent figures have shown that the domestic economy grew last year, and the NTMA has sold €1 billion in bonds below 3%. All of this attracts a positive sentiment towards Ireland from the rest of the world. We have reformed the banking system and jobs have been generated. When this Government took office, almost 15% of the workforce was unemployed, while the figure is currently just below 12%. We need to work harder on that, nonetheless. Having stabilised the economy, we now need to grow it.

I wish to raise certain points that the Minister might take into consideration for the year ahead. We have been targeting economic sectors, including construction. Part 5 of the Planning Act needs to be changed, however, because local authorities have ceased to build houses. I welcome this week's announcement allowing local authorities to build houses again, particularly in Kilcock in my own constituency. However, the Minister should encourage local authorities to have more shovel-ready projects on stream. The fault in my own constituency of Kildare North is that Kilcock seems to be the only shovel-ready project. There are no other such projects ready to go.

I urge the Minister to contact the County and City Managers Association to ensure managers are more proactive in getting projects ready. Then, when the funds are made available, they can actively pursue the building of more houses.

I would like to see tax breaks for middle income families who have taken the brunt of what has gone on over the last number of years. I would also like to see a broadening of the tax bands. It is too easy for people to go on the higher rate of tax when the threshold is just over €32,000. People speak to me about their fear of getting a pay rise as they automatically go on to a tax rate equivalent to approximately 52% above €32,000. I hope the Minister passes on to the Minister for Finance the idea that he might expand the tax bands for those on middle incomes who have taken the brunt of the pain over the last number of years. I would also like to see tax relief on child care costs, which have been growing exponentially. It is almost like a second mortgage for those who have a number of children. I ask the Minister to pass on to the Minister for Finance my request for tax relief for child care costs.

Many of us were elected for the first time three years ago with no idea of the workings of the House. We can look at it now. While I welcome some of the reforms which have been made, we must go further. I agree with the procedure for taking Topical Issues, which is an excellent addition. I welcomed the Constitutional Convention. It is a great idea to involve civil society in the process of making progressive changes to the Constitution. I liked the way in which civil society got actively involved in the debate on the Protection of Life During Pregnancy Act. We should do that for more legislation. However, there are certain things I find difficult to stomach. People stand up on the Order of Business and ask questions to which they know the answer. I do not know to whom they are grandstanding, but it seems to be a waste of valuable time. It is easy to make a telephone call to the relevant Department to inquire as to when legislation will be brought forward. The Order of Business should be used for Ministers to come to the Chamber and take questions on topics of the day of relevance to their Departments. The questions should be posed in an unstructured manner. While that would put Ministers under a certain degree of pressure, they would be well able to handle it.

I welcome attempts to bring more women into the Dáil. I do not agree with quotas, which are demeaning to women. However, I would like to see the Dáil become a much more work-friendly and home-friendly environment. There is no crèche here or other facilities to encourage women to come to work here. I am not in favour of quotas and would prefer to see women who are here on merit rather than on another basis. There used to be quotas for sheep years ago and we used to keep the numbers up in order to obtain payments. That is what seems to be happening here with regard to women.

There are sheep here.

Positivity has emerged over the last year. One can feel it on the ground. The confidence is returning to the people. Once there is confidence in the economy, the economy will grow. We have seen that in the figures for the gross domestic economy for the last year. While we are here to support Ministers in what they are doing, we also intend to keep them on their toes. We will not be quiet little backbenchers up here at the back. We will shout loudly every now and again when it is necessary.

I am pleased to contribute to this discussion on the Government's priorities for the year ahead. Nothing is more important for Ireland at this time than maintaining our plan for jobs and growth. As far as I am concerned as Chairman of the Joint Committee on Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation, the main priority is the first of those words, "jobs". When the Government took office in 2011, the jobs outlook was so bad that the live register was heading for 500,000. When the Taoiseach launched the 2014 Action Plan for Jobs two weeks ago, the CSO announced that just over 250,000 people remained unemployed. While that remains far too high, we have come a long way in three years. The unemployment rate has fallen for 19 consecutive months from 15.1% in February 2012 to 11.9% in February 2014.

Last October, we debated whether we needed a precautionary line of credit in order to safely exit the bailout. The proof that the correct course of action was adopted came in yesterday's NTMA bond auction. In the first bond auction since September 2010, the NTMA raised more than €1 billion on the international bond market at an historically low rate of 2.967% for our ten year benchmark bond. This is the lowest rate at which the State has borrowed funds and it highlights the significant progress made over the last number of years. Ireland is on the up again. People have made great sacrifices and endured much to make this happen. However, many have not yet enjoyed any upswing from the economic recovery. Far too many individuals and families remain battered by unemployment. They have yet to see recovery in their own lives. When we discuss Government priorities, we always come back to the primary challenge we face, which is jobs, jobs and jobs again. We cannot be found wanting in rising to the challenge.

Exiting the bailout was not an end in itself but was only the end of the beginning. Just as it had a plan to exit the bailout, the Government has a clear plan for jobs and growth. The strategy is based on three pillars - responsible management of the public finances, banking reform and job creation in the domestic economy via Irish entrepreneurs, tourism, rural enterprise, retail and the renewed construction market. This year will, rightly, see a renewed focus on the domestic economy. My committee, which is a cross-party committee, will focus on the retail sector and the rebuilding of many town centres nationally which have suffered greatly over the last number of years. We must ensure that economic recovery reaches every part of the State and not just urban areas. Spreading growth is very important. I am pleased that the new Action Plan for Jobs includes an IDA programme to build advanced manufacturing facilities and office space in regional locations to attract companies to more diverse areas.

Construction continues also have an important role to play. An industry which became bloated in the boom has now contracted far too much. I am glad to see that the Action Plan for Jobs includes a priority for Government of publishing a construction sector strategy by the end of the month. Our population is growing and will need schools, houses and infrastructure to prosper. The construction industry must expand sensibly to meet this demand. As we expand the construction sector through various public and private sector capital projects, we must use our imaginations to ensure that our own Irish-based companies win many of the contracts to keep jobs local. It is down to imagination. I dealt with a man recently who makes a lot of furniture for libraries, etc. Very often tender conditions require that a business has a high turnover, four or five years' experience in an industry or a record of previous Government projects before it can secure even small contracts. We must use our cop-on to ensure that we design projects which will win jobs locally. We have adjusted the weighting but there are other things we can do. I have a constituent who cannot win a contract locally. Such contracts often go to companies based in the UK and he ends up getting the work anyway through them. It is a crazy situation. We must use common sense to ensure that as we re-ignite the construction sector, our own companies can win some of these projects.

On the Action Plan for Jobs, I have specific points for the Ministers for Finance and Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation, respectively, on the importance of supporting two initiatives in the year ahead that will go a long way towards helping SMEs. Consulting Ireland's mission is to provide practical support to consultancy practices and individual consultants based in Ireland to target and develop in emerging markets by exploiting opportunities which are primarily funded by the major international funding institutions. Under the stewardship of Séamus McCann, its key objectives are to ensure that Ireland regains its status as a leading payer and increases its share of ever-expanding overseas consultancy opportunities in these markets. By increasing their volume of business in overseas markets, members of Consulting Ireland will contribute to all sectors of the Irish economy as follow-on business is won by other companies. While Enterprise Ireland is providing some supports to Consulting Ireland, a great deal more would be gained by Irish businesses if there were additional focused measures adopted by Government. There are more than 200,000 public sector contracts to be won on a weekly basis internationally. Ireland used to be a leading player in winning these contracts, but we let matters slip during the boom years.

We must focus our minds.

If Irish companies can win consultant contracts, the economy will gain from the additional work they provide. Significant opportunities are going to waste. While the issue was partially addressed in Action Plan for Jobs, we must press ahead and develop this area to create and sustain jobs. I would have liked to raise a number of other issues but I am aware that other Deputies wish to contribute.

Many positive changes have taken place in the past three years but much remains to be done. The Government set out a list of priorities and is committed to fulfilling them and making Ireland a better country for everyone. First and foremost, it wants to get the country working again by further reducing the number of unemployed. Its focus lies in helping the domestic economy through measures such as delivering inward investment from multinational companies, expanding exports and promoting Ireland as a tourist destination.

Productive infrastructural development is central to economic prosperity and industrial advancement. The availability of quality infrastructure is critical to productivity and competitiveness. Many gaps in our infrastructure remain and need to be addressed to aid economic recovery and environmental sustainability. Given the reduced level of resources available, the Government is committed to ensuring the country's infrastructure is capable of facilitating economic growth, enterprise development and job creation. In the past decade or thereabouts, approximately €70 billion has been invested in infrastructure and the productive sector, considerably improving the quality and quantity of infrastructure.

Many improvements have occurred in the past couple of years. The rural transport programme has been overhauled, restructured and placed on a more stable financial footing to protect it. New statutory guidelines have been published for planning authorities on the preparation of local area plans. Work is also under way on the N7 Newlands Cross and N11 Rathnew projects and preliminary work has begun on joining up the two Luas lines. Shannon Airport has been given independence and has increased passenger numbers. A sum of €70 million in funding has been approved to help communities devastated by recent storm and flood damage and €1.9 billion has been allocated for the new rural development programme. A nationwide broadband mapping project is also under way to identify areas that will need State-led intervention to deliver high speed broadband. These projects offer significant economic benefits and will continue to be supported in what is a much less favourable funding environment. The Government will continue to provide for the maintenance of our roads to protect the value of previous investments. It will also target the improvement of specific road segments where this will have a clear economic benefit.

The strong export performance in recent years is reflected in growth in traffic on the Dublin Port tunnel. The national road network stretches for 5,500 km, including almost 1,200 km of motorway, and now carries approximately 45% of total road traffic. The road network is a crucial component of the economy's export potential and carries goods to airports and ports for delivery to global markets.

It is clear that if we are serious about developing the regions, we must invest in infrastructure, particularly the motorway structure. Since I was elected to the House in 2011, I have constantly campaigned for the upgrade of the N4 and N16. Works on the N4 from Collooney to Castlebaldwin have gone to planning and I thank the Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport, Deputy Leo Varadkar, for his positive engagement with me on the occasions that I have highlighted the lack of motorway connection between Sligo and Dublin, in particular, the safety deficit on the part of the road on which the works will take place.

Our efforts to attract investment into counties Sligo and Leitrim are being thwarted because industrialists travelling west past Mullingar think they are heading into the outback. A good supply of efficient and educated workers in my region has resulted in investment by medical device and pharmaceutical companies. We would fare much better, however, if the region had transport access. While the Government cannot create jobs, it can create an environment in which others are encouraged to create employment. The N16 provides direct access from Sligo to Belfast through counties Sligo, Leitrim and Cavan. I am pleased to report that this is the first Government in many years to spend money on developing and realigning this road. The Minister has approved spending in excess of €2.5 million, which has enabled Leitrim County Council to improve safety, especially for large lorries travelling between Sligo and Belfast. Much more investment is required and I encourage the National Roads Authority and Minister to provide money from any future stimulus package that may come available.

In recent times, the county has been subject to extreme weather and severe flooding, which have highlighted the role of infrastructure in the smooth running of society. For this reason, the Government will continue to maintain and invest in vital infrastructure services, particularly flood defence. Although much infrastructural provision is delivered through commercial semi-State companies and the private sector, the State has an important role to play in this regard. It is vital that the correct policies and regulations are in place to maximise efficiency and competitiveness in the delivery of new facilities and utilisation of existing facilities. The Government plans to direct significant funding towards the maintenance and rehabilitation of regional and local roads.

I welcome the recent allocation by the Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government, Deputy Phil Hogan, of €500,000 to enable local authorities in counties Sligo and Leitrim to repair some of the damage done to local roads as a result of severe weather events. The allocation of €300,000 from the Office of Public Works and the office of the Minister of State, Deputy Brian Hayes, has allowed Sligo County Council to provide sea defences at Strandhill. The damage done by storms and coastal erosion in recent years threatened the future of this vibrant tourist village. More than 500 seasonal jobs depend on the resort's ability to attract golfers, surfers and tourists in general. I am pleased, therefore, that the Government has made such a positive response. Places such as Rosses Point, Enniscrone and other parts of Strandhill need assistance for works to complete more flood defences. I am hopeful that applications Sligo County Council has submitted to the Office of Public Works will be approved to allow the relevant projects to proceed.

I commend the Government on providing funding for projects that were essential in maintaining our infrastructure. I will support efforts in the next two years by the Taoiseach, Tánaiste and their Cabinet colleagues to place job creation at the centre of this country's future. The facts show that their approach is working. If we achieve growth of more than 2% this year, an effort should be made to reduce income tax for lower earners. When all other factors are considered there should be a large gap between what a person receives in social welfare payments and what he or she can earn in a basic job.

In 2015, the tax base will have been widened as a result of the introduction of the property tax and water charges. These changes have been a necessary response to the events that occurred between 2008 and 2010 when the system, with its excessive reliance on taxes on work, collapsed. I urge the Government to examine this area and try to reduce the burden on working people and families in the next two budgets.

It is appropriate that the House have discussions of this nature now and again. Given that most debates consist of Second Stage speeches on legislation, it is no harm to have a discussion on the political priorities of the Government or Opposition from time to time. It is obvious from the benches opposite, however, that the Opposition does not have many priorities this afternoon.

I will echo some of the comments made by previous speakers. Deputy English raised the difficulty experienced by one of his constituents who is involved in construction and can no longer tender for small school building or infrastructural projects because the thresholds pertaining to turnover have been changed. This is a significant problem and I am sure every Deputy will be aware of similar cases in their constituencies. Viable and successful businesses, which have done substantial work on infrastructural projects over the years, are being prevented from tendering for works, including relatively small projects, because their turnover falls below a threshold that has been set at a very high level. These companies may end up doing the work in any case as they are often subcontracted at a later date by the company that wins the tender. This issue must be addressed, especially as the Government is set to make an announcement on infrastructure and the construction sector a couple of weeks from now.

I also echo some of the sentiments expressed by Deputy Lawlor on the procedures of the Oireachtas. Changing the manner in which the Dáil and Seanad do their business should be a Government priority. The Government has correctly prioritised a number of reforms in the economy, judicial system and health system, including the manner in which the Health Service Executive and Department of Health operate. It has not, however, fundamentally altered the way in which the Oireachtas, specifically the Dáil, carries out its business. I was taken by comments made by Deputy Charles Flanagan last week on a number of changes that should be made. The Deputy made a strong case for the establishment of a firmly independent Office of the Ceann Comhairle. He called for the Ceann Comhairle to be elected by Members because under the current system he or she is elected in theory only because the nomination is made from another quarter.

He also recommended the introduction of a well-resourced parliamentary legal office. While we do have legal supports in the Oireachtas, they are over-stretched. If we want a strong committee system that works properly then that parliamentary legal office needs to be resourced accordingly to fulfil its function.

With regard to the daily business of this House and the Order of Business, it is often said that one should not ask a question to which one does not know the answer. Most days the Order of Business in this House is ridiculous in terms of Members often raising constituency issues which have a tenuous link with forthcoming legislation. Like me, the Minister of State, Deputy Brian Hayes, and the Acting Chairman, Deputy Tuffy, are former Members of the Seanad where the Order of Business operates differently and is much more topical in terms of matters that are urgent on a particular day. There is an argument to be made for improving and greatly altering how the Order of Business in this House operates.

On the improved economic situation of the country, the main issues during the last general election was the economy and jobs. For the first time in six years, we are now seeing significant economic improvements and a significant decrease in the number of people unemployed. This is not down to emigration alone, as it may well have been during the early days in office of this Government. More than 60,000 jobs have been created to date. I was sickened to hear a former Cabinet Minister, Deputy O'Dea, say on national television, and re-echoed in this House yesterday by Deputy Ó Cuív, that these jobs are imaginary or, more pointedly, that jobs created in the agriculture sector are not real jobs. During the past 12 months, there has been a significant improvement in employment in the agriculture and food sectors. Those jobs are real. Deputies O'Dea and Ó Cuív should, perhaps, speak to people in their constituencies of Limerick and Galway who work in the agriculture and food sectors, which people know that those jobs are real.

I commend the Minister for Finance and the Minister of State, Deputy Brian Hayes, on yesterday's progress by the National Treasury Management Agency in auctioning off €1 billion worth of bonds at an unprecedentedly low bond yield rate, which is indicative of the significant progress which this Government has made in terms of our funding ourselves into the future, which was a core part of the argument on which the last general election was fought.

In the short time available to me, I wish to focus on the emerging housing crisis which needs to be top of the Government's agenda. I know that the Minister of State, Deputy Jan O'Sullivan, is aware of the extent of this problem and is taking measures to tackle the it head on. However, I believe there is a lack of recognition around the Cabinet table of the extent of the crisis, which is the reason I raise the matter today.

I see this crisis manifest itself on a daily basis in my own constituency from Swords to Balbriggan. Having heard the contributions of other Deputies in the Dáil during yesterday's debate on the housing issue, I know that they encountering the same problems day in, day out. We need unanimous ministerial support to address our social housing problem and to give it the priority it deserves. Only with this support, will there be enough political will to ensure further measures can be delivered. We need that political will and we need it now.

We need to provide new social housing units as a matter of urgency. The previous Government stopped building social housing units long before the economic crash. Owing to its reckless disregard for the economy and the fiscal crisis left to this Government there was no money to recommence building when we first came to power. The much heralded NAMA units we hear so much about are part of the answer but they will not solve the problem. We need properly planned local authority housing and integrated, mixed developments in order to provide stable homes for people who are on waiting lists and for those who find themselves homeless. I welcome the two announcements this week by the Minister of State, Deputy O'Sullivan in regard to void housing units and first build of new housing stock since the economic crash in 2008. We will continue to push for further steps towards the provision of more housing units.

We also need to ensure that Part V planning in respect of social housing remains in place for when the private housing market picks up. Part V housing is an important part of social housing provision. As the economic crash has proven, we cannot rely on Part V housing as our only source of social units. We also need to build additional units through the local authorities. More people are becoming homeless owing to the housing crisis. People on rent supplement who are unable to have their tenancies renewed are particularly affected. If one visits any of the property websites and searches properties for rent in North County Dublin one will struggle to find properties which will accept rent supplement. I regard this as economic discrimination and I will be calling on Cabinet to consider legislating against the practice of excluding people in rent supplement from applying for rental properties. In this regard we also need to prioritise the roll-out of the housing assistance payment announced last July. This move will integrate payment of rent supplement and the social housing support systems by local authorities. We also urgently need to re-examine the cap levels for rent supplement. Everybody in this House will agree that rent supplement is not a sustainable system long term. While the current situation is being tackled, discretion for the setting of rent caps needs to be devolved to community welfare officers. Community welfare officers understand the local markets, know the people involved and have the professional experience to deal with cases fairly and appropriately.

The announcement earlier this week by the Minister of State, Deputy O'Sullivan, in regard to the allocation of €15 million towards the redevelopment of void or vacant housing stock will result in the speedy turnaround of up to 500 units throughout the State which would otherwise be further delayed and not tenant ready. While this is a good step, more is needed. I believe the Government should set a statutory target for void units. Current time lags of nine months and upwards are too long. I believe as part of the Government's strategy on housing that we should look to establishing a statutory target for void housing units, which should be set at 2% of housing stock, or less. We have a housing crisis and a Minister of State in place to beat it. However, the entire Cabinet needs to accept the breadth and complexity of this crisis. North County Dublin is an example of what is happening countrywide. I believe a secure roof over a person's head is a basic right. This should be the number one priority for the Government until such time as this crisis has passed.

I take issue with Deputy Michael Martin's expressed concern in the House earlier this week that we are spending too much time debating the Government's priorities. I remind Deputy Martin that I have the same mandate from the people of north County Dublin to speak on their behalf as Deputy Martin has from the people of Cork and I reject his attempts to deprive me of that.

I welcome the opportunity to speak today and I urge the Government Whips to continue to provide all Deputies with opportunities to speak in this House on behalf of their constituents.

While there are a number of areas on which I could focus, like Deputy Brendan Ryan, I propose to focus on the issue of social housing, as it is an issue that effects my constituency considerably. While I am aware that the priority of this Government is jobs the housing crisis that is emerging will have to be addressed.

I am a member of the Labour sub-committee on housing which have been actively identifying specific areas that require precedence and focus by the Department. There is a developing crisis within this sector which is due to the shortage of supply. Currently, the demand for social housing units exceeds the supply to such an extent that it is effectively proving impossible for our local authorities to meet the needs of those most in need and most vulnerable. Like some of my colleagues, my office is inundated with housing representations on a daily basis. This has increased significantly over the past nine months, due in particular to a combination of factors. My office is in weekly contact with the housing officers in Carlow and Kilkenny local authorities. We are also in contact with the housing organisations, Respond and Focus Ireland, which are also under tremendous pressure. Homelessness has become a pressing issue. We do not have in place adequate policies to ensure that individuals and families can avoid having to live on the streets.

Three weeks ago the Constitutional Convention made a decision to recommend that economic, social and cultural rights, including that to a home, are contemplated by the Constitution.

As a result of the action taken by the Government, we now have an economy which is on the cusp of recovery. Unfortunately, however, there is now an even greater demand on the system what was the case in previous years. The assessment of social housing need for 2014 reveals that there are 89,000 people who are in need of housing. This fact is further amplified by the current cap on rent allowance and high rental rates. The latter have resulted in a substantial reduction in the availability of private rented accommodation. In Kilkenny alone, the rental rate which obtains has reached a staggering €850 per month. When one visits various websites devoted to rented accommodation, it is often stated that those on the rental accommodation scheme, RAS, need apply. The RAS has played a pivotal role in recent years in delivering units within the private rented sector to those most in need of housing. I am of the view that emphasis must be placed on the private rented sector in the short term in order to alleviate the pressures on local authorities and housing organisations. Introducing a form of rent moderation or rent control in the private sector could provide to be a viable option. Most individuals and families are unable to access affordable private rented accommodation as a result of a lack of availability or because rental rates now exceed the cap. That which I suggest would merely be a form of crisis management and it is not intended to be a long-term solution. If we are to address the issue of rental rates in the short term, I suggest that an interdepartmental approach be taken by the Departments of the Environment, Community and Local Government, Social Protection and Public Expenditure and Reform.

In the long term, the Government must prioritise both direct provision and Part V provision. The Government and local authorities need to be directly involved in the roll-out of social housing into the future. This has always been Labour Party policy. I congratulate the Minister of State at the Department of the Environment, Community and Local Government, Deputy Jan O'Sullivan who has taken heed of the concerns being raised by her colleagues and local authorities. Earlier this week funding was allocated for the direct provision of housing units in Carlow and Kilkenny. In that regard, €1.8 million was allocated to Carlow County Council and €1.5 million was allocated to Kilkenny County Council. In focusing on direct provision, perhaps the Government should investigate the option of the State offering subsidies or tax incentives through the provision of low cost loans instead of tax reliefs. This could work to increase the availability of properties, ensure the repayment of loans and provide private landlords with the option to renovate their properties and bring them up to standard. In doing so, they would be obliged to sign their properties into the rental accommodation scheme for a explicit period and offset the repayment of the loan against the scheme.

I am of the view that this is a positive debate as opposed to being a back-slapping exercise. It is important to point out that a great deal of good work has been done by the Government during the past three years.

I welcome the opportunity to contribute to this debate. Like previous speakers, I was happy when I learned that the Government intended to make time available for statements on its priorities for the year ahead. This debate provides us with an opportunity to reflect on what has been achieved. However, it also allows us to consider what we want to do in the coming period. As a backbencher, I do not often get the opportunity to speak in this Chamber and I sometimes envy the amount of speaking time those on the Opposition benches enjoy. In that context, I welcome the opportunity to have my voice heard.

While I acknowledge the amount of work the Government has done in focusing on job creation, the economy - both of which had to be prioritised - and placing the country on a firm financial footing once more, we must also consider the impact of other events, both international and weather related, in the context of this debate.

The first matter to which I wish to refer in this regard is the amount of flooding we have experienced this year. In 2012 the Joint Committee on Environment, Culture and the Gaeltacht produced a report on flooding in the aftermath of a huge summer flooding event which occurred on the River Shannon. I would like that report to be debated in the House at some point during the current year. I realise that there are very pressing matters which must be discussed. However, it is very important that the report in question should be debated here. While flooding events in urban areas often hit the headlines and are the subject of news reports, there are other parts of the country which are flooded on a regular basis and this has an impact on home owners, landowners and businesses. While flooding has subsided in some urban areas, it was not done so in a number of rural ones. The Oireachtas joint committee did a great deal of work when compiling its report and I hope it can be debated in the House, along with the eight recommendations the members of the committee feel should be implemented in order to tackle flooding on the River Shannon as a matter of urgency.

The second matter I wish to discuss is that which relates to a rural and regional enterprise strategy. I welcome all the efforts of the Government and the various agencies involved to ensure that the creation of jobs - by means of foreign direct investment and by indigenous companies - in urban areas. However, I represent a rural constituency, Laois-Offaly, and I would like much more effort to be invested in trying to raise the boats of those who live in the midlands. While the latter is not usually the subject of major job announcements, there is no doubt that it has a story to tell in the context of its very skilled and excellent infrastructure. There is a need to focus on these two aspects. One action we could take is to adopt a more coherent tourism strategy, particularly as the midlands has a great deal to offer. It must be noted that many agencies responsible for dealing with tourism. The issue of broadband must also be dealt with, once and for all. Small and medium enterprises are struggling as a result of a lack of regular and constant access to broadband. IDA Ireland does not arrange that many tours of the midlands for potential investors from abroad. There is excellent industrial infrastructure in place in towns such as Tullamore, Edenderry and Birr and this could be used by foreign business which want to establish operations here.

I welcome the efforts made to date in the context of Dáil reform. I particularly welcome the introduction of quotas to encourage increased female representation in this Chamber and in the Seanad. Meeting such quotas is going to present a challenge for the political parties but it would be better for society as a whole if the level of female representation were increased. In the context of other reform, I am concerned that there is conflict with regard to the work schedules of the Dáil and committees. I am of the view that this matter should be examined.

I would like action to be taken, as soon as possible, on the report of the Joint Committee on Justice, Defence and Equality into the review of the legislation on prostitution and the reform of the latter in terms of prosecuting the user. The Attorney General and the Department of Health have been asked for their opinions in respect of the report. I urge that this matter be tackled as soon as possible because a serious problem exists in this country in the context of trafficking, prostitution and domestic, sexual and gender-based violence. I accept that this issue is very broad but there is no doubt that we need to focus on it.

I welcome the opportunity to speak on the Government's priorities for 2014. The attitude adopted to this debate in recent weeks by the Opposition shows that it has not learned any lessons from the past. Before I arrived in this House at a time when the country had more money than sense, announcements relating to Government priorities were made in hotel function rooms rather than in this Chamber. Deputy Martin likes to refer to the importance of the role of Parliament. This debate reflects the importance of the Parliament by giving Members regardless of party affiliation an opportunity to send a clear message to the Government regarding their views and those of their constituents on what it should prioritise for the coming year. This is a welcome debate and I thank the Government and the Taoiseach for facilitating it.

We have come a long way in three years and today's sale of ten year bonds clearly shows as much. They have now reached a record low; never before have we sold ten year bonds at below 3%. That in itself is a reflection of the work the Government has done to restore international and economic credibility to the State. However, for the second half of this Government's term the work will involve how we take the recovery and stability from a macro level and bring it to every community in the country and to every family and home. That is the body of work that remains to be carried out. I will briefly focus on five areas that I am keen for the Government to prioritise and work on in the coming year.

The first is the area of youth unemployment. We need to maximise and harness everything we possibly can from the youth guarantee scheme. The scheme was negotiated by the Irish Government during our Presidency of the European Union Council. The scheme gives our young people an opportunity to tap in to training programmes and further education. It sends out a message that the country does not simply say to young people who are unemployed that they should go down to the dole office and get their giro. Rather, it says that they have a future in this country, that we need their brains, energy and enthusiasm and that we need to harness these for the future of our economy and society. The plan submitted by the Government to the European Commission for approval in respect of how we wish to implement the youth guarantee scheme in the country is a welcome step, but we need to do more. We must consider the programmes we have in place for entrepreneurship and other areas that we could tailor to encourage our young people to get involved in entrepreneurship. The statistics in the country for the number of young people who set up their own business is significantly behind the European average and I hope this is something we can try to rectify.

We need to examine how we fund many other services. One crucial example is the disability sector. We have seen relevant examples at the Committee of Public Accounts and people have read about it in newspapers in recent weeks and months. The State took the view that its only responsibility to people with disabilities was to write a cheque and then instruct the service provider to provide the services. That was clearly not good enough and we have seen the problems that can arise when there is no proper oversight. There is a commitment in the programme for Government to the introduction of individualised funding or personalised budgets for people with disabilities. We promised this model of funding during the election, we campaigned on it and both parties put it into the programme for Government. If such a model was in place then it would not be possible for issues such as those relating to the Central Remedial Clinic or the Rehabs of this world to arise. They would not arise if we had a situation in which the client was empowered. There is no way any other citizen in the country would be treated the way people with disabilities are treated in respect of that funding model.

We need to continue to prioritise and work on the area of mortgage arrears. I know the banks are due before the Joint Committee on Finance, Public Expenditure and Reform in April. Progress is being made in this regard but we need to continue to work on it and get the message out to the banks that telling people that a voluntary sale is the only option is not a long-term sustainable mortgage solution.

We also need to realise and get the message out as we approach the local elections that our local economies and local government structures need to play their part. If I open any local newspaper in the country I will see references to an individual calling on the Government to do something, and this has been the case for far too long. There is a role for a Government and national bodies but there is a role for councils, councillors and local communities as well. The establishment of the local enterprise offices will afford an opportunity for debates and discussions on structures to revitalise our main streets and how to bring the recovery from a national level down to a local level.

We need to re-examine our education system. We need to figure out how to ensure that it continues to be relevant to our economy and society. One area we need to examine is how we teach information technology and computing in schools. People used to ask what the business language of the world was and someone would suggest that it was French or Chinese. Another language of business in the world now is coding. We have seen major work done by organisations such as CoderDojo and we have seen major companies such as PayPal locate in this country but we must realise that teaching people how to type on a word processor in schools has nothing to do with the knowledge economy. We need to go on to take the next steps. These are the five areas I hope the Government will continue to work on and give some priority to during 2014.

The problems we face as a country are precisely the problems we faced when we came to Government three years ago, namely, the creation of jobs, unemployment, emigration and personal and public debt issues. We have gone a long way towards tackling some of the major macroeconomic issues and we should give credit where credit is due in terms of what the Government has done in the past 12 months to deal with the bank guarantee, the promissory note deal and the removal of the troika from the country. While some said it was not a tangible thing to remove the troika, it has resulted in a major feel-good factor nationally and it has helped the national psyche in terms of people feeling more positive towards the future and the development of the country.

The Minister for Finance, the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation and all the Ministers in the Government deserve credit for their efforts to deal with the legacies of Fianna Fáil. We have created 61,000 jobs in the past 12 months. More than 19,500 IDA Ireland-supported jobs have been secured in the past two years as well as more than 5,000 Enterprise Ireland-supported jobs in the past 12 months. Long-term unemployment figures are down. In particular, in the counties I represent along the Border - Cavan and Monaghan - long-term unemployment figures are down.

More needs to be done on the jobs front to develop better infrastructure along the Border. There should be more joined-up thinking between the State agencies in the South and those in Northern Ireland to ensure the peripheral areas of the North and the South are not left behind. One legacy of the past is that we still do not have a proper basic road network along the Border. It should have been put in place during the past 20 years. I realise some of the EU Programme for Peace and Reconciliation money went towards reopening roads but there has been no concerted, cohesive approach to developing roads. Nothing has been done in the case of the A3 from Monaghan to Belfast. At the moment the United Kingdom Government is introducing a tax on Irish trucks using Northern Ireland roads. We have gained a concession for the road between Monaghan and Dundalk through South Armagh and the road between Monaghan and Cavan through Fermanagh, but more needs to be done, and I would not limit it to the A5. There is much talk of looking for concessions for the A5 but all the major national roads, including the M1, the A4, the A5, the A3 and the A1, should be exempted from this tax. My preference is for all roads in the North to be exempted to develop an all-Ireland economy. It is a retrograde step for the British Government to introduce this tax. It will increase transport costs throughout the island and certainly it is not welcome.

Unemployment rates have come down significantly in recent years. The rate is 11.9% at the moment. More needs to be done. I believe the Action Plan for Jobs, the JobsPlus scheme, the youth guarantee scheme and the local enterprise offices being introduced by the Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government, Deputy Hogan, and the Minister for Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation, Deputy Bruton, will all help to tackle the unemployment problem.

We need to reverse the disastrous economic policies of Fianna Fáil. Fianna Fáil was great for Perth, Melbourne, Sydney and all of those cities because they got cheap Irish-educated labour to go over there and develop those cities. Fianna Fáil was brilliant at exporting our young people to develop those cities. Fine Gael needs to get those people back. As skill shortages emerge in the coming 18 months in the economy because of the shovel-ready projects we will be bringing on stream, whether in health, education or elsewhere, we need to advertise in those cities and make our young people over there aware of the job opportunities at home. It would represent a failure of this society if we fail to bring our young people back. It is a simple thing but it needs a concerted effort by central government to advertise in those cities and make the people in those cities aware of what is available at home and then get them back home.

I referred to investment in shovel-ready projects. Our county managers throughout the country should be mandated by central government to get design and planning out of the way for much-needed projects so that when funds become available, the projects go ahead immediately and we are not left waiting with a lag of two years, nine months or 12 months before we get started. The county managers should be mandated to establish what is needed in each of the counties and then proceed to get the design and planning stages out of the way. Many of the planning offices are under-utilised the moment. I believe this approach will pay dividends in the medium term rather than the longer term.

We are in a position now where we can avoid some of the mistakes of the past and even the present in terms of town centre development. I hate to see the situation which is constantly unfolding whereby central government, local authorities or state agencies use public money to invest in what are basically steel sheds on the edges of town centres. These buildings are of no architectural merit whatsoever. This is happening while our town centres rot and buildings of historical and architectural merit are not developed. This has been a failure of our society for many years. It should be addressed and it can be addressed, but it needs a co-ordinated approach from the various Departments. This is something we need to do now before things start to improve significantly throughout the country.

My final point relates to town centre development. While there has been an improvement in retail figures in Dublin and along the east coast, many parts of rural Ireland and small towns outside the commuter belt are not seeing any major uplift in retail. We need to develop a cohesive planning strategy to ensure that communities throughout the country have proper services in place and that some supports are put in place by the State. That is what happens in other economies and countries.

Where areas have no pharmacies, general practitioners or basic services, some State supports are put in place to look after their communities. Some might claim that this is support for retail and manufacturing and that we do not want to go down that road, but if we are to have a co-ordinated response in areas of deprivation or where there are diminished services because of emigration, it must be managed centrally. The free market does not always provide these services.

An issue affecting many Border counties is symptomatic of the fact that our society is not as competitive as it should be. It is easier for foreign companies to win tenders in the Republic than Irish companies. We must consider what we can do to make it easier for Irish companies, fully cognisant of the restrictions placed on central government by European law. For the past ten or 15 years it has been much easier for UK companies to tender for and win projects in the Republic than Irish companies. The Government must consider what further measures can be put in place to redress this imbalance. If we can do this and reduce the unemployment rate during the next four or five years to 4%, 5% or 6%, to the point at which there is effectively employment, the Government will have done the country some service.

If we want to develop a mature democracy, we must get rid of the populist politics of the past and the sticking plaster politics of Fianna Fáil and ensure we will never again have the high levels of emigration of the past ten years. It was a failure of our society in the 1930s, 1950s and 1980s that we could not educate and find work for our young people. We needed to send them across the world to find work. I hope the Government will put in place strong, sound economic measures to ensure this will not recur. That is the responsibility of everyone in politics. We must keep those on the benches opposite from getting back into power to mess up the economy again and leave people with no option but to emigrate. That is key for the Government and we are on the right track. I wish Ministers well in their tasks in the coming 12 months.

I take great pleasure in contributing to the debate on the question of what the Government has done and intends to do. We exited the bailout programme last December. Our grandfathers fought for this country and we set up and defended the institutions of State. It was harrowing to see a party that had always put its own interests ahead of those of the country selling it and a result, we lost our economic sovereignty.

It is good that more than 60,000 new jobs were created last year and that unemployment is now at its lowest level since 2009. The economy is growing and significant progress is being made, but our society has faced considerable difficulties. Most business people have lost their businesses; hundreds of thousands of people entered into unemployment; most house owners are in negative equity; and many of our brightest young people have emigrated. It was claimed that Ireland would need to default, but we did not; we kept to the plan and I am delighted that it has worked.

I have been dealing with the issue of turf cutting in my constituency. My party and the Government were left a ticking time bomb by the Fianna Fáil Administration. This matter should have been addressed in early 2000. Instead of getting a deal along the lines of that for the sugar beet industry, this issue was kicked to touch. Fianna Fáil introduced the great lie - as I cannot use that word, I will say "untruth" - that there was a derogation to cut turf for ten years. When I visited Brussels after three months with a few colleagues and Mr. Conor Skehan of the Peatlands Council to meet the Commissioner, Mr. Janez Potonik-----

The Deputy cannot use the word "untruth" either.

I will withdraw it. We told Mr. Potonik that there was a derogation for ten years and that we wanted a further six months, given the fact that the subject was complex, difficult and emotive. The Commissioner looked at us and asked, "What derogation?" There had never been one. Instead of dealing with the issue at the time, Fianna Fáil left it for us to handle.

I am delighted that nearly 1,000 families in special areas of conversation, SACs, in my constituency are receiving compensation of €1,500 per year each for the next 15 years, tax free and index linked. Those who did not want money could avail of free turf or be relocated to other bogs. This is the case, regardless of Deputy Luke 'Ming' Flanagan's claim that nothing is being done. In 2005 the Fianna Fáil Government decided which natural heritage areas, NHAs, would be blocked. In May 2010 the Fianna Fáil Cabinet decided that there would be restrictions on turf cutting from the end of December 2013. Once again, the Minister for Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Deputy Jimmy Deenihan, has dealt with the matter. Following dialogue with Brussels, the most heavily cut sites have been excluded, avoiding an impact on more than 80% of active turf cutters. Does anyone listen? The answer is no, as the press goes for the sensational story. A great deal of work is being done behind the scenes and on the ground and I do not doubt that vast numbers of good, decent people have received their compensation or been relocated and are glad to be able to cut turf. I know from speaking with them that they are happy.

Deputy Luke 'Ming' Flanagan stated no one had applied for turf cutting compensation in my county. I stated 600 had applied, but 800 people had actually received compensation. He stated there would be no money for compensation, but people have been receiving money for the past two years and will continue to do so. The Deputy has got it wrong. The only person who has done anything for turf cutters in County Roscommon is Deputy Frank Feighan in working with his colleagues and the Minister. The only difference between Deputy Luke 'Ming' Flanagan and me is that, although neither of us has ever stood on a bog, at least I admit it.

I welcome the opportunity to contribute to this debate. Substantial progress has been made by the Government in a relatively short time. In March 2011 Ireland was a much different place, it was in political and financial meltdown. Slowly but surely, in 2014 it is fighting back and moving in the direction of recovery. Significant work by the Government and the people has resulted in this becoming the first country to emerge from a bailout programme. The troika left our shores last December; the promissory note payments and Anglo Irish Bank are no more; the economy is growing; and we have returned to the international bond markets.

The most pressing issue faced by the Government was and continues to be job creation. In the limited time available to me I will speak on this matter. In response to the jobs crisis, the Government put in place Action Plan for Jobs in early 2012. It is a whole-of-government approach involving every Department and agency, with quarterly targets and assigned responsibilities. The plan was aimed at systematically, brick by brick, building a sustainable economy that could create the number of jobs we needed. Our competitiveness has improved steadily since the process was first launched, moving from 24th in the Institute for Management Development rankings in 2011 to 20th in 2012 and 17th in 2013. We are regaining the ground we had given up. A competitive economy will stimulate job creation. By metric, the jobs plan is working in a macro sense.

However, many people are not feeling it yet and we still have a long way to go. It is important to remember, however, that we have gone from a situation where we were shedding 1,600 jobs per week to one where we are now adding 1,200 new jobs per week. It is painstaking work but it can only be done, point by point, action by action.

I said before in the House that I am disappointed with the geographical spread of new employment, as it is currently skewed towards the major urban areas of Dublin, Cork and Galway. I believe more attention and support should be given to the regions to ensure a more balanced and ultimately sustainable employment recovery.

Shannon Airport is the major driver of economic activity in the mid-west and County Clare. There has been an extremely encouraging start to the airport's new status as an independent entity which bodes well for the future. In its first year as an independent airport under the capable guidance of chairperson, Rose Hynes, and chief executive officer, Neil Pakey, it has reversed five years of successive passenger decline by recording an increase in passenger numbers on 2012. Passenger growth is the initial priority for Shannon. Progress on the wider plans, including the development of an international aviation services centre to complement the existing cluster of 40 aviation related businesses, has also been made. The State airports (Shannon group) Bill is set to be introduced to the Dáil for debate prior to Easter with enactment expected before the summer recess. The significant strengthening of destinations and services for passengers at the airport this year is no doubt as a result of the Government's decision to change the administrative model radically and create the new independent structure.

Ryanair has eight new destinations this year to Berlin, Faro, Fuerteventura, Krakow, Munich, Nice, Paris, Poitiers and Warsaw. Aer Lingus Regional is almost doubling capacity, including a new Bristol service, while Aer Lingus has also just launched its first daily year-round transatlantic flights since 2009 with its Boston service. It will commence the six times weekly New York service in March and a new Malaga service in April. United Airlines will increase its capacity on the Chicago route by 88% this year.

Shannon Airport has stepped up to the mark as a key economic driver for the region. The recent high-profile investments such as Donald Trump's acquisition of Doonbeg golf course and his planned investment would not have happened without the existence of Shannon Airport. The renewed energy, vibrancy and strong momentum at the airport is very welcome. I am confident that more direct and indirect jobs can be created in the mid-west and County Clare as a result.

This debate should not be viewed as being a list of achievements or back slapping by the Government, rather it is a means of putting forward the Government's priorities to the House and to the people. We acknowledge that the Government has had to make tough decisions. I pay tribute to the people for their role and assistance in rescuing the country's economic sovereignty. Everything we do in politics must be for the sake of our people, the men and women of Ireland who have paid a price through emigration and unemployment to ensure our country returns to being a place where people can have work and live a full life.

The primary task of this and any Government is job creation and job retention to avoid a culture of dependency on welfare while recognising that the most vulnerable must be looked after. We must help indigenous small and medium enterprises to become the powerhouse of the economy. The scourge of emigration must be tackled. On the eve of the St. Patrick's Day holiday, it is important to use this occasion to encourage our emigrants to return to become entrepreneurs and movers in the national economy.

People must be empowered. The Constitutional Convention was a tremendous success. I pay tribute to Tom Arnold, Art O'Leary, the citizens and the elected parliamentarians who gave complete commitment to considering the issues in pursuit of reform of the Constitution to make it better suited to a modern Ireland. One hundred citizens and parliamentarians worked together effectively to devise constitutional reform.

This House should reform its procedures for doing its business. As a Chairman of a committee, I suggest we should examine how the committee system operates. Some committees are perhaps more intent on getting headlines and looking for a scalp rather than debating and analysing the issues before them. The House should examine how to make itself more relevant to the outside world.

Job creation is vital for my constituency. A total of 1,000 new jobs in Cork city have been created this year and €33 million has being provided by the IDA and Enterprise Ireland since 2012. More than 1,100 jobs have been created in the period 2011 to 2013. These jobs are a fantastic boost for Cork city, cementing our city's strong reputation for attracting foreign direct investment and for being a hub and gateway for Munster and the south west. It is clear that companies believe Ireland and Cork have become much more competitive and that this is a country in which they are confident to do business and in which to make long-term investment. The jobs announced are in diverse areas such as construction, manufacturing, science and technology, engineering, information technology, finance and administration. These jobs are to be welcomed, not least because the trend shows we are open for business and we have a qualified and educated workforce ready to be employed. The potential benefit for local economies is crucial. The Government is delivering for our people while acknowledging that the people have made sacrifices.

I compliment the Minister of State, Deputy Brian Hayes, on his handling of the recent flooding events. I was a Member in 2009 when Cork was flooded. At that time there was procrastination, obfuscation and inaction. This Minister of State was actively engaged in providing a template for dealing with flooding in Cork city and county and how flooding can be averted in the future. It is not a simple matter of flicking a switch because it requires a progressive and planned approach. I welcome the funding of €100 million. I hope the three-year project in 2015 will end the worries of many about flooding in the city and county of Cork.

The people of Cork are not insular and are instead very outward looking. We need a convention centre in Cork and the Government has given €10 million to this project, along with €6 million from the city council. The convention centre, by its nature, will increase footfall in the region. I call on the Government, the Dublin Airport Authority and all stakeholders to ensure Cork Airport is not a white elephant and becomes a pivotal player in driving economic change and a better lifestyle for the people of the south west. It is a gateway and a hub for job creation. I do not want it to become a white elephant and I have a fear it will become one.

There is a saying that Kilkenny used to be the capital of Ireland, Dublin is now and Cork will be in the future. If Deputy Buttimer has his say, that will happen sooner rather than later.

I welcome the opportunity to contribute to this debate, which is taking place in week one of the fourth year of this Government's term. It is a good time to review where we have come from and look ahead to what needs to be done in the coming years. Some speakers referred to job losses, the bailout and so on, while others focused on the improvements in the economy and State finances. Reference was also made to today's news regarding bonds. There are people who would decry Professor Morgan Kelly for shooting a precautionary arrow across the bows last week when he highlighted the fragility of the economy at this time, and the vulnerability of the small and medium enterprise sector in particular. While his comments might be a case of stating the blindingly obvious, it is important we keep in mind that factors which may not be within our control could at any time jeopardise the progress we have achieved to date.

One lesson we should all have learned from the so-called Celtic tiger years is that an arrogant and cocky Ireland was not a place that endeared itself internationally. When this Government assumed office, apart from restoring the economy, we had to work in parallel to restore our reputation as a country that is serious about doing business and doing what we do best. We had to show we could go back to looking after the basics that are fundamental to an export-driven open economy like ours.

A great deal of good work has been done in the past three years and we are in a position now to capitalise on that. However, there are areas which require a sustained focus. It is often said, correctly, that it is not possible to tax one's way out of a recession. Equally, however, the talk in recent weeks of some benefits for taxpayers in the next budget is a cause for some concern. We must avoid cutting taxes in such a way that we end up with another unsustainable boom. Having said that, we have seen how measures such as the VAT rate reduction for services industries, including tourism, have led to job creation and an overall increase in revenue for the State. In such cases, taxes forgone should be viewed as an investment in the economy, whether it be €200 million, €300 million or €500 million. If we get the balance right in this regard and proceed slowly and incrementally, we can create jobs and reduce the national deficit by growing the economy rather than imposing additional taxes, cutting services and reducing the public sector wage bill. We must be as efficient as we can - that goes without saying - but we also must consider the bigger picture.

Several speakers referred to the issue of housing, which is something I raised at a parliamentary party meeting last night. We are at a crisis point in Wicklow and other counties, especially those close to major centres of population. It is a problem that must be addressed urgently. Deputy Brendan Ryan made a very valid point about how community welfare officers manage rent support in the short term, but there is no long-term fix. The problem is we do not have vacant houses in any significant number in the areas where they are most needed. There are 2,500 people on the county waiting list in Wicklow, for instance, with probably another 2,000 on the town lists of Bray, Wicklow and Arklow. That is a serious problem.

Rural development, the Leader programme and the work of the Commission for the Economic Development of Rural Areas are issues on which we need to focus in the coming year. The status of An Post and the post office network was highlighted recently and is central to the restoration of the rural economy. I have written to every Minister seeking assurance that the post office service will be favourably considered as a front office of Government for the delivery of licences, certificates and forms.

I am glad to see the Minister of State, Deputy Brian Hayes, in the Chamber. Deputy Buttimer is right that he has proven to be a hands-on Minister of State who does not try to plámás people with quick-fix solutions that cannot be honoured. He tells it as it is and should be commended on so doing. I wish him well in his other endeavours, albeit he will be missed if he is successful. I am not saying this because his wife is from Wicklow but because it is genuinely my view.

I welcome the opportunity to contribute to the debate. I will focus, in the time available to me, on the area of health, which is one of the key issues of concern to people. I intend to deal specifically with mental health issues. The Government has a policy of developing the mental health services, an undertaking it gave in the programme for Government. While progress has been made, there is concern regarding the level and pace of that progress. The funding has been made available, but the pace of change within the Health Service Executive is not what we would like. What is needed at this point is a full report to the Oireachtas regarding the HSE's expenditure of moneys allocated since the beginning of the Government's term for developing mental health services.

We are coming from a very low base in this regard, with only 5.3% of the total health budget allocated to mental health services. In England and Wales, that figure is 13%, while in Scotland it is 18%. The Scottish authorities have made considerable progress in the development of mental health services, with a reduction in the rate of suicide of 17% in recent years. This has been achieved by the introduction of new policies and strategies that were made possible because 18% of the health budget is ring-fenced for mental health. The HSE, through its National Office for Suicide Prevention, has a policy of developing suicide prevention programmes, suicide research and support for the bereaved. The budget for that office has doubled under this Government, from €4 million to €8.9 million. The Road Safety Authority does a very good job and deserves whatever funding it gets, because too many people are still dying on our roads. However, when one compares its budget of €41 million with the €8.9 million allocated to the National Office for Suicide Prevention, one sees how far we still have to go.

Towards the end of this year, Reach Out, a programme that was initiated ten years ago to progress the development of suicide programmes, will come to an end. While preparations are being made for a follow-up programme, I have concerns in this regard. It took three years to develop Reach Out, during which time the then Government, whenever it was requested to respond to needs in this area, was able to reply that it was waiting for the expert group to report.

The whole process was stagnant for three years while the report was being produced. The National Office for Suicide Prevention is conscious of what took place on the last occasion and that those who want to develop suicide prevention programmes are concerned it could recur.

Approximately four years ago, the State and the HSE introduced a programme to reduce stigma entitled, See Change, on which we would like a report because the funding available is inadequate. A key step we must take to improve mental health services and reduce the incidence of suicide is to ensure people can gain access to services early. One of the key obstacles is stigma and denial in regard thereto. I would like to see these objectives acted on by the Government through the programme for Government.

Like other speakers, I believe the progress made to date by the Government is significant. General indicators show our debt is now very much sustainable and that growth has returned. Unemployment levels are dropping, employment is increasing and there is low inflation. Generally, therefore, progress is reasonable.

I wish to talk about challenges at national level and those that arise for me at local level as a Deputy in Limerick city. With regard to national challenges, I wish to take up a point on Professor Morgan Kelly's commentary on the SME sector. The challenges are such that there is a need to ensure we can decouple property debt from the business and working capital debt of SMEs. In many cases during the Celtic tiger years, sound businesses invested in property, thus affecting their capacity to maintain and create jobs. Our first priority must be to ensure mechanisms are put in place to decouple property debt from business debt. Ironically, this was done for the banks through NAMA in that many of the development loans causing difficulties for the banks' balance sheets were transferred to the agency. We must consider doing something similarly creative for the SME sector.

As the economy continues to grow, we must ensure the banks can provide adequate capital, particularly where bridging finance is required by companies for building projects. Thus, if there are opportunities in the marketplace, the banks should provide funding in advance. This might arise where funding is required to build a small estate. Typically, a company may need to invest in plant and equipment to create and export products. We must create an environment in which people can establish an enterprise culture in the SME sector and must reward them for doing so. As we all know, the multinational sector is vital, but SMEs are the backbone in terms of job creation.

Locally in Limerick city we have made significant progress in the past three years. Limerick local authorities will be merged into one after the next local elections. At executive level, this has happened. There is a Limerick city economic plan for the period to 2030, but we need to consider strategies for rural villages. Doing so is vital. In County Clare the relevant villages include Parteen and Ardnacrusha. On the Limerick side, they include Castleconnell, Murroe, Cappamore, Caherconlish, Doon and Ballyneety. It is a question of putting a mechanism in place to ensure they can survive and prosper.

Multinational jobs are being created consistently by a wide range of companies across a range of sectors, which is very welcome. I visited Dell only last week and learned that it employed 1,000 people in Limerick consistently in value-added jobs and creative areas. This is to be welcomed.

In Limerick, in partnership with the Shannon Airport Authority, we are putting in place a plan for a diaspora centre. The national diaspora centre, proposed under the Department of Transport, Tourism and Sport, will, if successful, be a major provider of jobs and spin-off economic activity in the region, including Limerick city. I am very supportive of the project, on which I am actively engaged as it will bring major benefits to Limerick and the wider region.

I thank my colleagues on both sides of the House who contributed to the debate. It has been a useful and worthwhile exercise that has demanded that every Minister answerable to the House set out his or her priorities for the year. It was important that priorities were set out in plenary session, not only in order that Members could hear them but also that they could assess the Government's success, or otherwise, in pursuing them. The great majority of speakers in the debate were on the Government benches or the Front Benches of the various parties. This is important as it allows Members to tease out how the priorities relate to their constituencies and areas of policy interest.

As we stated when we published the medium-term economic review at the time of our exit from the bailout programme in December last, the key responsibility of the Government is to continue to make, on a brick-by-brick basis, progress in the economy. That progress can really only be tested by measuring the number of jobs created and the confidence that I hope is being restored in the economy. The fact that the National Treasury Management Agency was able to publish today the very significant news of the sale of the ten year bond, at an historic low level of 2.9%, is to be noted. It was the first ten year bond sale since 2010 and is another example of investor confidence in Ireland.

Ireland is a small, open, trading economy that is very much determined by and based on the level of investment and economic interest of major trading partners. As a small, open, trading economy, investor confidence is king. We will not get money back into Ireland or enjoy construction and other opportunities unless we have a sound financial basis. The clear commitment of the Government, as set out in medium-term economic plan, is to eliminate the deficit by 2018. We are committed to continuing to make progress next year and thereafter on reducing the deficit, which was our undoing in 2008 in 2009. I very much hope the Government will continue to work with colleagues on all sides of the House in pursuing its objectives and, ultimately, being accountable for these objectives as we proceed this year. I thank all Members for their contributions.

Barr
Roinn