Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Joint Committee on Health díospóireacht -
Wednesday, 28 Sep 2022

Sláintecare Implementation: Discussion (Resumed)

Before we get to the main item on today's agenda, minutes of the committee meetings on 20 and 21 September 2022 have been circulated to members for their consideration. Are they agreed? Agreed.

The purpose of the meeting is to discuss the implementation of Sláintecare, with a focus on workforce planning. To enable to the committee to consider this matter, I am pleased to welcome Mr. Robert Watt, Secretary General; Ms Rachel Kenna, chief nursing officer; Ms Margaret Campbell and Mr. Bob Patterson, principal officers; and Ms Grace O'Regan, assistant principal officer, Department of Health. I am also pleased to welcome Mr. Paul Reid, chief executive officer; Mr. Damien McCallion, chief operations officer; Ms Anne Marie Hoey, national director, human resources; and Ms Yvonne Goff, national director, change and innovation.

Members and all in attendance are asked to exercise personal responsibility in respect of protecting themselves and others from the risk of contracting Covid-19.

All witnesses are again reminded of the long-standing parliamentary practice that they should not criticise or make charges against any person or entity by name or in such a way as to make him, her or it identifiable or otherwise engage in speech that might be regarded as damaging to the good name of the person or entity. Therefore, if any of their statements are potentially defamatory in relation to an identifiable person or entity, they will be directed to discontinue their remarks. It is imperative that they comply with any such direction.

Members are reminded of the long-standing parliamentary practice to the effect that they should not comment on, criticise or make charges against persons outside the Houses or an official either by name or in such a way as to make him or her identifiable. I remind members of the constitutional requirement that they must be physically present within the confines of the Leinster House complex in order to participate in public meetings. I will not permit a member to participate where they are not adhering to this constitutional requirement. Therefore, any member who attempts to participate from outside the precincts will be asked to leave the meeting. In this regard, I ask members partaking via MS Teams that, prior to making their contributions, they confirm that they are on the grounds of the Leinster House complex.

I invite Mr. Watt to make his opening remarks.

Mr. Robert Watt

Good morning, Chairman and members. I thank the Chairman once again for the invitation to join the committee to discuss progress in the implementation of Sláintecare. As he mentioned, I am joined by Ms Rachel Kenna, chief nursing officer, Ms Margaret Campbell, principal officer in the strategic workforce planning area and Mr. Bob Patterson and Ms Grace O’Regan, who work in the Sláintecare implementation division.

We have discussed previously our progress in meeting the challenge of Sláintecare in terms of integrating health responses between the acute and community, and in delivering more care close to where patients live.

I am happy to report we are making progress. Our enhanced community care programme continues to expand and develop as planned. Ninety of the planned 96 community health networks are now established, as are 21 of 30 community specialist teams for older persons and 17 of 30 community specialist teams for chronic disease management, while 21 community intervention teams are now operational and securing national coverage. One of the things we discussed previously was GP diagnostics. Some 170,452 scans have been provided to end August 2022, which is a significant advance on the number provided last year. We plan to expand this service further next year.

We remain on target in enhanced community care, ECC, recruitment. Of the total target of 3,500, almost 1,900 have already commenced their roles, with a further 420 at an advanced stage of recruitment.

As the committee is aware, we are currently at phase one of the regional health area, RHA implementation, which is focused on the high-level design of the service delivery model for the health and social care service - the organisational arrangements needed to deliver integrated models of care. Six RHA streams have been established, focusing on clinical governance and accountability; finance, inclusive of population based resource allocation; digital and capital infrastructure; people and development; change, communications and culture; and programme co-ordination. The work of the workstream groups will feed into an implementation plan that will be finalised by the end of the year. Work has started on the development of a population-based approach to service planning and resource allocation. A population-based resource allocation funding model will be part of the Estimates for 2024. My Department recently published a spending review paper which provides an analysis across six countries to establish international best practice in this area to see how they can best inform our approach going forward.

The transition to RHAs will continue next year, with recruitment for senior posts starting as early as possible. The Minister, Deputy Donnelly, has established an advisory group of patient and staff representatives from across the health and social care sector who continue to engage and contribute to the development of this implementation plan.

Stakeholder consultation is key in developing the new structures for integrated care. Several events have been held with health sector stakeholders to make sure what we are designing better enables integrated, patient-centred care. This has included engagement with the HSE board and senior leaders within community healthcare organisations and hospital groups. The Departments and the HSE are also involved in detailed engagement on regional health areas with the dialogue forum for voluntary organisations, and the engagement will continue. Six regional events for employees are being held in September and October to gain input from staff in terms of this reform.

As regards the specific item on the agenda for this morning, and Mr. Reid will speak about this in a moment, we expect at this stage the increase in whole-time equivalents to be approximately 4,600 this year. By the end of August, staffing levels show a growth of 2,600. All staff categories are showing growth in the year to date with the largest increase seen in nursing and midwifery. All nursing and midwifery graduates in the class of 2022 have been or are being offered permanent opportunities within our health system.

To supplement the national pool, the HSE has implemented a drive to source nurses and midwives from the international market. As the committee will have seen from recent research published by the Department of Health, we must dramatically increase the numbers of nurses we train to reduce our reliance on such international recruitment. This increase began over recent years, and we will have in place an additional 344 undergraduate training places for nurses and midwives.

The HSE has similarly directly targeted all the health and social care professional, HSCP, graduates from Irish colleges, and these applicants are being interviewed and will be offered jobs from October onwards. To supplement the pool, international campaigns have been launched in a number of different areas, and the Department of Health is working with the Department of Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science to increase the number of HSCP students in Irish colleges over the years ahead.

Our capacity to recruit people is also an issue and significant activity is taking place. Recruitment capacity has increased within the Public Appointments Service, particularly for the recruitment of medical consultants. The HSE is also developing targeted initiatives to enhance the candidate pool, focusing especially on hard-to-fill posts. In recognition of the scale of global competition for health care talent, the HSE has developed and implemented a globally competitive relocation package to attract international recruits to our service.

Working with the Department of Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science, we have succeeded in securing an extra 60 places on medical courses for Irish and EU students this year, with agreement to increase this by a total of 200 over the next four years, but even that announcement will not be sufficient.

We will have to increase the numbers much more and probably double the places we make available in the quickest timeframe possible. We will need to look at different ways such as expanding or creating new schools, and all options we can to provide more opportunities for people who want to join this important profession. As I say there is agreement to increase the places but I think we will need to go much further than that. In common with other healthcare professions, the numbers of Irish and EU medical graduates we are producing is far short of the numbers we need to meet the healthcare needs of the service, as discussed before. The demographic challenge is increasing demand all the time and we need to increase our workforce and train more people to participate into the future. Clearly a big issue for us is to look at all opportunities to increase the number of graduates we produce domestically. We are making progress on recruitment and reform, but obviously we need to accelerate this and I am very happy to take questions from members of the committee.

I call Mr. Paul Reid.

Mr. Paul Reid

I thank the committee for the invitation to discuss a range of Sláintecare programmes, and the issue of recruitment, retention and staff training, including the National Ambulance Service. The Chair has introduced my colleagues in the room and those participating by video link so in the interests of time, I will not do so again. Beginning with the enhanced community care programme, its objective in line with Sláintecare, is to deliver increased levels of healthcare locally with service delivery reoriented towards general practice, primary care and community-based services. The programme has been allocated €240 million for the establishment of 96 community health networks, 30 community specialist teams for older people and people with chronic diseases, to provide integrated services for people nearer to their homes. To date 2,300 staff have either been recruited or are at advanced stage of recruitment. A total of 90 of the planned 96 community health networks, 21 of the community specialist teams for older persons and 17 chronic disease specialist teams have already been established. National coverage for the 21 community intervention teams has been achieved and a volunteer-type model in collaboration with ALONE is being rolled out, with 6,000 people now supported through this coordinated support mechanism.

A sum of €25 million has been provided to deliver increased access to diagnostics for GPs, with 160,000 additional tests provided this year to date. On the regional health areas, the HSE is continuing to take forward this key reform programme, working closely with the Department. As outlined by Mr. Watt, phase one of regional health areas implementation is focused on high-level planning and design, in particular the service delivery model for the health and social care system and the organisational arrangements needed to deliver integrated care models. Comprehensive communication and engagement processes are being progressed, including in recent weeks and as recently as yesterday. Meetings continue with staff and with the voluntary dialogue forum and six major regional health events across community health organisation, CHO, hospital group staffs and other stakeholders throughout the country in Cork, Limerick, Sligo, Kilkenny, Tullamore and Dublin.

Addressing waiting lists is a key priority for the HSE. Hospital groups have been supported to deliver additional in-year activity in 2022, with non-recurrent funding provided to deliver additional outpatient appointments, additional inpatient day-case procedures and additional scopes and diagnostics. Additional longer term investment proposals have been submitted to the Department to support the implementation of 37 modernised scheduled care pathways and a number of hospital group priority investments to address recurring capacity gaps. In the year to date the number of long waiting patients in outpatients has reduced by 19%, inpatients and day cases by 12%, and GI scopes by 65%. Securing further progress on waiting list and waiting times will be a key priority for the HSE for the remainder of this year and beyond.

I will move on to emergency departments and our winter plan. We continue to face significant levels of demand for unscheduled care services. This year to date total emergency department attendances have increased by more than 5% compared to the same period in 2019, with attendances for outpatients aged 75 years and older increasing by 13%. Emergency admissions have also increased, in particular for the over-75s. The HSE is working very closely with the Department of Health to prepare for the winter plan 2022-23. Key areas of focus will be enhancing the local injury units; overtime for staff to support out-of-hours services; transitional care funding; aids and appliances; complex packages of care; utilising private capacity; enhanced nurse staffing in emergency departments; enhanced consultant and registrar staffing in emergency departments; seasonal vaccinations; and communications to support public awareness.

Key areas of focus will be enhancing the local injury units, overtime for staff to support out-of-hours services, transitional care funding, aids and appliances, complex packages of care, utilising private capacity, enhanced nurse staffing in emergency departments, enhanced consultant and registrar staffing in emergency departments, seasonal vaccinations and communications to support public awareness.

On recruitment, retention and training, an area in which the committee is particularly interested, the HSE is working on a range of actions to ensure the effectiveness of our recruitment efforts. Short-term actions are focused on hard-to-fill posts, including recruitment and retention of Irish trained graduates, extended international recruitment campaigns, an easy-to-use, streamlined application process, widening of the skills list and overseas relocation packages. Medium to longer term actions are focused on increasing domestic supply and working towards greater self-sufficiency. In the year to date, HSE staffing levels have increased by some 2,700 whole-time equivalents. In the period since the beginning of 2020, the HSE workforce has grown by more than 15,000 staff.

As the largest employer in the State, the HSE has an extensive and broad offering of training and development programmes delivered both nationally and locally. These programmes are tailored for both clinical and non-clinical staff. Nationally there are over 300 programmes available via HSeLanD. A further 410 are available under leadership learning and talent management programmes and further programmes are delivered by the HSE leadership academy. There is also a range of profession-specific programmes delivered across the country.

The National Ambulance Service college delivers training to staff through education and competency assurance officers, both within the college and across the service. Sixty-two new paramedics qualified from the National Ambulance Service college in August 2022. The National Ambulance Service continues to actively recruit new staff throughout the year and in March 2022 launched a rolling advertising campaign for qualified paramedics, student paramedics and intermediate care operatives. To date, this has secured 161 new recruits.

The processing of the pandemic special recognition payment continues to receive priority across all hospitals and community services. Some 123,000 employees have received the payment, 85,000 of whom are in HSE statutory organisations and 38,000 in section 38 organisations. The HSE is working with the Department of Health to take forward the payment of recognition awards to staff working in other organisations included within the organisation types covered by the Government decision.

On Mr. Reid's final point, he referred to 123,000 workers in the HSE and section 38 organisations who received the pandemic recognition payment. Will he give the committee an update on other workers, particularly members of the Dublin Fire Brigade and ambulance drivers, who have yet to receive the payment? What is causing the delay?

Mr. Paul Reid

There is a process ongoing between Ms Anne Marie Hoey, the HSE national director of human resources, and the Department in terms of the identification of other organisations, including section 39 organisations. We do not have a central record of that but it is an ongoing process between the HSE and the Department. We are recruiting some specialists to put the full net around everybody in scope. If any of my colleagues would like to add to that, they are welcome to do so.

Ms Anne Marie Hoey

As Mr. Reid said, we are working towards ensuring that payments to non-HSE and non-section 38 staff are made. Working with the Department of Health, we have to increase some capacity to enable that. We have recently tendered for support and capacity to help us in that regard. That tender has now closed and it will be evaluated this week, with the award being made in the very near future. In line with the Government decision, we will move forward immediately to progress the payments to non-HSE and non-section 38 agencies.

Does Ms Hoey have a sense of when people will be paid?

Ms Anne Marie Hoey

The tender has closed and will be evaluated this week. It will be awarded in the next couple of weeks, after which the administration will commence. Realistically, we are looking at November or December before the payments will start to flow, so it will be another couple of months. Plans are in place to expedite that.

I thank the witnesses for attending and for their presentations and the work they are doing in delivering health services. On the development of healthcare in the community, I want to give an example of where it is not working. I have a case of a 79-year-old who was in hospital with Covid for three months. He lives on his own and has impaired vision. Six weeks after coming out of hospital, he still had not been visited by a public health nurse or anyone else from the HSE.

He ended up back in hospital with a kidney infection for a further four days. I am wondering about the connectivity out there in the community. Is it really happening especially with people who are discharged from hospital? This is not a rural area, this is in an urban area. How can something like that happen when we are supposed to have more people now working within the community?

I want to check the issue as regards working with GPs. The workload of GPs has increased dramatically in the past two years in particular. We are now rolling out the extension of the free GP service for under-7s. I am not clear whether there has been direct engagement with GPs on this extension. The big issue that GPs have is the lack of support in terms of having nurses employed. When one compares with the UK there is probably one nurse for every GP employed in a practice. We do not have the same ratio here. My understanding here is that in one GP practice with six GPs there are only moneys available for one nurse. Are we looking at expanding that? If we want to keep more and more people out of the hospital system we need to increase the level of services provided in the community.

Mr. Paul Reid

Mr. Watt may want to comment on some of the policy issues. To answer the Deputy's first question on older persons' care in the community, we now have national coverage for the community intervention teams and they are multidisciplinary teams. It is fair to say that some areas are more mature than others both in terms of the step-down process and integration between the hospital and the community. Some of my colleagues who work in services might want to comment. What we have seen are significant extra resources working between the acute hospitals. For example, consultant geriatricians are now working part-time in the community, that is half their time in the community and half their time through what we call the integrated care for older persons process. Personally I have seen a lot of older persons getting their care in primary care centres or places closer to their home.

Would Mr. Reid not accept that six weeks after coming out of hospital there was no call, and this person is residing not that far from a HSE headquarters?

Mr. Paul Reid

I am more than happy to take up the case separately if Deputy Burke sends me the details. I do wish to stress that some areas are more mature than others in terms of this process. We are increasingly seeing geriatricians in particular, and multidisciplinary teams in those community intervention teams, in those older persons' teams. We now have significant areas of the country covered. I know the Deputy said that it is a urban area. There have been significant advances. I have personally seen people getting their care in a much better way. My colleague, Ms Crehan-Roche, was with me where we met a 92-year old getting their care managed in a primary care centre from a geriatrician.

Can we move on to backup support within GP practices? Has there been any discussion on that issue because, in fairness, GPs are at the coalface and are meeting people every day. Given the volume of work that they now have without any additional support, what engagement will there be with the IMO on that issue?

Mr. Robert Watt

There is an increase in demand for GP services. That reflects demographic changes that we have spoken about before. There has been a fairly significant increase in the overall payments to GPs and capacity over the past number of years on foot of the new contract in 2019. In the context of the Government's announcement yesterday there are now plans to extend free GP service to significantly more numbers of people. We have been in discussions with the IMO particularly on the issue Deputy Burke raised around capacity. The Government is committed to providing more support there. So there will be more -----

Does that support include the employment of nursing staff?

Mr. Robert Watt

Yes.

What kind of timescale are we talking about? One must remember that we have a huge number of GPs retiring in the next five years so we have a challenge from that point of view as well.

Mr. Robert Watt

We also have a large number of new GPs entering and leaving training and entering the profession as well. I accept that there is a demographic issue at the other end where GPs are retiring. Yes, our Department has been engaging with the IMO on this and will now have further engagement given the Government's announcement yesterday.

It is about additional nursing staff, administrative staff and other supports. In the context of the increase in capacity that has been proposed, the Government is very anxious to hear exactly what types of supports they need. We have had an early engagement and we will have further engagements, no doubt, in the weeks ahead. The Government is determined to implement this from next year so we need to have those plans in place and this commitment to increase those resources this year as well as next year. On the exact details, we want to engage further with the IMO and that is what we intend to do over the next few weeks.

Concerning workforce planning, one of the issues I have raised previously relates to people leaving the HSE and the hospital system and exit surveys. Have they been comprehensively introduced in every hospital at this stage to establish the reasons staff are leaving? In some cases, staff have difficulties with the management structure in a particular unit of the hospital, and there are other issues where they are not being accommodated because they might have family pressures, etc. Are comprehensive exit surveys being conducted with people who are leaving the service?

Mr. Paul Reid

We are anxious to put this on a more consistent footing. I will be doing my own exit survey later this week. We are anxious to give it consistency. I will ask Mr. O'Dwyer to come in on this. We want to understand, at a hospital level in particular. However, at community level we understand and we have good processes across the country for people to give feedback on this. In general, we are seeing younger persons leaving because they can travel. Thankfully, we are seeing younger people coming back to the service from Australia, London or Manchester; I have met a lot of them.

Mr. Reid mentioned Mr. O'Dwyer from the South/Southwest Hospital Group. I have to raise the issue of elective hospitals. To retain staff and get a service delivered effectively, elective hospitals are needed. What is the status of the decision on Cork? The submission was made in January to the Department. Here we are almost ten months later and we still do not have a decision on where the site is.

Mr. Robert Watt

We are almost there in terms of the final steps.

I think I heard that last April as well that we were almost there. We are now ten months later.

Mr. Robert Watt

We are a lot closer. We were not that close last April, with all due respect to the Deputy. The Government has made a decision in principle. We are going back to Government, I think, in the middle of October - Mr. Patterson will correct me if I am wrong - both in terms of Cork and Galway. We have to through the various processes that are set down by the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform and go through the elements of the public spending code. That has been completed now. The evaluation has gone to the major projects advisory group. The Government will, I am sure, give the green light in October. We need then to go to detailed design and procurement.

What is the timeframe Mr. Watt is setting on that?

Mr. Robert Watt

I do not know the exact timeframe-----

Does Mr. Watt accept that we have a problem in the south and south west area? The population of Cork has increased by more than 170,000 over the past 20 years. No additional beds were created in that particular period. Like every other part of the country, we have an ageing population and, therefore, there will be a need for access to hospital services.

Mr. Robert Watt

We do not have any issue with the case. We think there is a very strong argument for having new elective hospitals in Cork and Galway to increase capacity and to separate out scheduled and unscheduled care. This is something clinical colleagues in the HSE keep on stressing in the context of dealing with waiting lists in a more systematic way in the future. We need to separate out different paths and we need more capacity to do that. Our Department is fully supportive of the proposals for Cork, Galway and Dublin.

Mr. Paul Reid

Mr. O'Dwyer may want to come in on the exit surveys.

You are on mute, Mr. O'Dwyer. I do not think we are going to hear from him today.

Mr. Paul Reid

Ms Crehan-Roche might want to come in. She is in the services.

Ms Breda Crehan-Roche

I hope everyone can hear me.

Yes, we can.

Ms Breda Crehan-Roche

As regards enhanced community care and the integrated care programme for older people, ICPOP, teams for the elderly, the best way to explain this is to give an example. Tom comes to the accident and emergency department. He has had a fall, he is seen and it is found he has fractured his hip. He goes into surgery and gets seen there. There is then a discharge programme and co-ordination where he is discharged back into the community. He is seen by the consultant geriatrician, because in Community Healthcare West, which is Galway, Mayo and Roscommon, we have four integrated care programmes for older people, each of which programmes has a consultant geriatrician. There are clinical nurse specialists, CNSs, occupational therapists, OTs, and physiotherapists, who are multidisciplinary and work closely with GPs. Tom goes back into the community but needs a little bit of transitional care. He goes into one of our ICPOP beds in one of our community nursing units and is then discharged after four weeks with a follow-up plan and with multidisciplinary teams involved.

Another situation is that of Ambrose, who has fallen but, thankfully, has not sustained a fracture. He does not need to go into hospital, so he is sent back into the community instead to be seen by a consultant geriatrician. He gets four weeks' transitional care in one of our care homes and is then discharged into the community with a follow-up, which would be multidisciplinary and would involve physiotherapists and OTs, depending on his presentation. He is seen and is looked after in the community and his family are supported with respite and home support.

That is the way it works. If somebody is in hospital, there is great integration between the hospital and the community. There are weekly discharge meetings and we look at what supports a person needs. We also have frailty at the front door. For example, last month in Galway, 133 people were seen in the accident and emergency department and we saved 236 bed days. Again, that was supported through community, step-down, transitional care beds, and being seen by consultants and by the multidisciplinary staff. That is the way it works.

There is also home support, and people get the home care packages they require, including aids and appliances and adaptations to their homes, which sometimes involves the local authorities. That is a very quick synopsis of the way it works between the hospital and the community.

Mr. Gerry O'Dwyer

I apologise to Deputy Burke and I will follow that up directly. Normally, as identified by Ms Crehan-Roche, we have a very close relationship between the community and the hospital, we work very closely, and we have a series of meetings every week, as Ms Crehan-Roche has clearly identified, so I am surprised at what the Deputy outlined. I will follow up with him directly afterwards, because I need to apologise to that man on behalf of the health service and we need to ensure that what happened does not occur anywhere else. It is quite unusual, and based on the clinical background Deputy Burke has given us, I am very concerned about it, so I will follow it up directly afterwards.

As regards exit interviews, which Deputy Burke also raised, we have a series of exit interviews and frequent meetings with the staff associations to try to ensure that, if there are any issues that are not resolved or if there is a particular trend in any location where the staff are leaving for any particular reason, those issues are followed up because we are very concerned we maintain and retain our staff at all costs. We have a regular update by the HR director on people who transfer or leave for other locations. I am quite satisfied that, where issues have been raised, they have been dealt with. If there are any other issues, Deputy Burke should not hesitate to give me a call because I will follow them up urgently. As was said by the CEO and the Secretary General earlier, we are also doing our utmost to recruit internationally to fill all possible vacancies and to ensure we have a seamless healthcare service moving forward following the whole model of Sláintecare. That is very important to us all at this stage.

I welcome our witnesses. I would anticipate that this is Mr. Reid's last meeting with the committee and I will maybe say a few words on that at the end of my contribution.

I will start with workforce planning as this is one of the issues we wanted to discuss with Mr. Reid and Mr. Watt. We had a constructive meeting on the regional health areas in the Department of Health some time ago. Workforce planning was identified as one of the key issues affecting the health service and requiring more attention if we want to be successful in transforming healthcare. Training, recruitment and retention are the three elements involved. I will not have time to deal with all of them in one contribution so I will focus on training. Correct me if I am wrong, but I did not see anything in yesterday's budget on workforce planning. Nor did I see anything about expanding graduate and undergraduate training places in healthcare or in relation to specialist or intern training places. Was there anything in the budget on increased funding for workforce planning?

Mr. Robert Watt

Yes, there is a focus on the numbers, which the Deputy is aware of, but there is also a focus on increasing the number of places. Ms Kenna might set out-----

No, not a focus. I am talking about actual funding to increase the training places. I will make it easier for Mr. Watt. The Department of Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science breaks graduate positions into the following categories: nursing and midwifery; medicine; therapy and rehabilitation; social work and counselling; pharmacy; diagnostic and treatment technology; dental studies; and health, other. If we start with nursing and midwifery, how many new entry places will be funded next year as an increase on last year?

Mr. Robert Watt

I think it is 200.

Ms Rachel Kenna

This year we have 135 additional nursing and midwifery undergraduate places. The Deputy may or may not be aware of the recent spending review paper which set out that we will have to significantly increase the number of places over the next ten years. We are working on an increase of approximately 200 next year in addition to the increase of 344 places since 2020.

For the purposes of clarity and given that we will not be able to go through all of the categories, I ask that the Department send on the information. The categories are nursing and midwifery; medicine; therapy and rehabilitation; social work and counselling; pharmacy; diagnostic and treatment technology; dental studies; and health, other. Will the Department set out in a paper for the committee what the year-on-year anticipated increase will be over the next number of years, across all of those fields of study? That would be helpful.

Mr. Robert Watt

Rather than going through all of the numbers now because reading them out would take up too much time, we will do that. As the Minister has mentioned previously, we will increase the number of graduate opportunities in all the areas. We will set out a note for the committee but even based on the current plans, I do not think that will be adequate. We will have to engage in a significant step change. I mentioned the increase of 60 medical places this year and we will increase the number by 200 by 2024, going from 750 to almost 900. That will not be enough given the demographic changes we are seeing.

I want to get to-----

Mr. Robert Watt

We will send a note setting out the detail.

I want to get to the issue of GPs if I can but before I do, there are a number of areas where we have real pressure points and difficulties. We have rehearsed some of those over the past year at various meetings of this committee and other committees of the Oireachtas. Children's disability network teams are probably staffed at about 70% at this point. We have a problem with recruiting staff into these teams. In mental health we have a dire shortage of consultant psychiatrists, psychologists and staff in the child and adolescent mental health services, CAMHS. We have a real challenge right across mental health services in recruiting staff. Using the hours we have funded for home help is a major challenge because we cannot recruit the staff to provide them. We have a lot of challenges in those areas and I do not see a plan that tells me we will solve these issues.

I will give one example that makes the mind boggle. I asked a parliamentary question about what interventions the disability section of the HSE will make to try to fill the positions in the children's disability network teams and how it will recruit more staff. The HSE stated it was looking at sponsorship programmes, apprenticeships and assistant therapy grades to help.

I then put a question to HR in the HSE. They come back to say they are not looking at sponsorships, apprenticeships and assistant therapy grades. So which is it? When one arm of the HSE is saying it is going to do something and another is saying it is not, that does not fill me with confidence. Could Mr. Reid address that point first because we have had several exchanges on this at the children's committee and other committees? We have to deal with parents of children with disabilities and those children themselves who are waiting for access to therapies. We all know how difficult and challenging it is, yet the staff cannot be recruited. I do not see the urgency and I do not see the plan. Perhaps he might enlighten us as to whether there have been any changes in the past couple of months. These are the areas that we need to drill down into and examine the shortfalls of staff are and the positions cannot be filled and the impact it is having on the end-user and the patient.

Mr. Paul Reid

I will ask my colleague, Mr. McCallion, who has taken up the role of chief operations officer at the HSE and who has put a priority on disabilities.

Mr. Damien McCallion

I accept that children's teams are below 70% in terms of numbers, particularly with regard to therapies. That is a big challenge for those teams. We are looking at a number of initiatives. We are looking at sponsorship in some cases. Some of our CHOs are doing that to see how successful it will be. We know we have a limited pool of graduates in Ireland in any given year and we are looking to utilise those across a range of areas. We talked about enhanced community care, acute care and CAMHS, which the Deputy mentioned. A range of services need those same grades. We have commenced a process internationally in recent weeks to see whether we can also supplement the current supply in Ireland, because clearly there is a constraint through international recruitment both in the UK and further afield. We are working with our HR team on that. We are looking at all options because we recognise that priority areas for us are some of the people who are most vulnerable in terms of disability and CAMHS.

I would like to move on to GPs, so I ask Mr. McCallion to send a detailed note on the areas of mental health, disabilities and home helps, and the additional measures are being taken to fill gaps in those areas.

Mr. Damien McCallion

Sure.

I would like to ask Mr. Watt one question on the policy commitment announced yesterday to extend free GP care, which I support. In our alternative budget we had a similar number to what was announced, but we also provided for additional support to GPs for training and staffing and specialist nurse training positions in general practice, for example, to increase the number of nurses working in this area. However, in the line item measure in the budget, it is lumped in with IVF supports that will come later in the year and extending free contraception for women, all of which we support. What was the actual cost of the measure to extend GP care to 340,000 people plus the additional supports it mentions would be put in place? The overall envelope of money for reducing the cost of healthcare is presented as €107 million. How much of that is for extending free GP care and the supports to GPs?

Mr. Robert Watt

The Government has an amount in the envelope.

There is €107 million. There are five measures within that and, therefore, I am asking for the costs for extending GP care and additional supports for GPs to employ staff.

Mr. Robert Watt

It will depend on the balance between the capacity supports and the rates and numbers. For next year, the cost is circa €80 million, and the Minister announced it would come in from 1 April, so the full year cost is more than that.

That would not add up because that is €80 million, and the Minister said yesterday there is €10 million for IVF yesterday-----

Mr. Robert Watt

I am just referring to the GP eligibility aspect.

That does not strike me as adding up to €107 million.

Mr. Robert Watt

It does add up. The Minister will talk in more detail on this at 2.30 p.m., but there is a discussion going on here. It depends on the balance between the numbers, the rates and the actual level of capacities. There are moving parts here.

I want this to work. We have had discussions on this ourselves as well. I think everybody wants this to work.

I have tabled many parliamentary questions on this over the past year and I have had this out with Mr. Watt directly as well. I could not get costings and I was told that the work was not done on looking at demographic changes and an increase in demand that will happen if GP care is extended. We have to make sure that the foundations are right and that there is sufficient GP capacity because concern is that if this is done without putting in place the additional capacity, general practice will be overwhelmed and the waiting lists will be longer than they are for GPs, which will create real problems. That is why the substance of what was announced is important. We have to see the substance. Mr. Watt said the Department will engage with the representative body and there is more to be teased out. That strikes me as almost putting the cart before the horse. That should be done first and it has not been done. That is a problem. That is not a question; that is an observation on my part

Mr. Robert Watt

We have engaged with the consultant body. We set out, in general terms, what the Government was planning to announce yesterday. We spoke about our commitment in respect of capacity supports and how that would work. There are complexities about how this actually works and there are different ways. We invited the IMO because their members are the ones who are closest. As they are providing the service, they know where the issues are. We asked them to engage with us. There is enormous, detailed work; I think we shared some of the work with the Deputy. I think we published papers on this. There is enormous work being done in understanding the latest supports and demands. The Government has made its commitment and we need to work through it.

As it is Mr. Reid's final meeting, I wish him well in his retirement. I know he had a very difficult role to fulfil with Covid-19 over the past number of years, along with the cyberattack and many of the challenges the HSE faced. On my own and my party's behalf, I wish him well and thank him for his work in healthcare.

I thank the witnesses for their attendance. I want to make a few points on GPs. I represent Dublin South West and there have been closures of GP practices through retirements and for other issues. I do not need an answer on it, but I want to get it on the record. Some of these GP practices served mature populations and seniors. It is very dislocating when that happens, as seniors are concerned about their files and access to their files, etc. It may not be something worth worrying about, having spoken to other GPs when they have taken them on; if there is an issue, they will put them through a raft of tests. I am confident about that.

In Templeogue, the only option for people on the general medical services, GMS, scheme was Nutgrove. It is a long way to travel. It is something to look at. A number of GPs are not taking over-70s, which creates challenges. This is going to happen. A number of GPs have retired, there have been bereavements and other issues that have caused a lot dislocation, particularly concerning patient files. It is a big issue for patients when a GP retires or their GP practice closes. They ask: "What happened my file?" or "Is it my file or the GP's file?" I would like to log that with Mr. Reid, along with the issue of not taking GMS patents aged over 70.

I would like a note on the primary care centre in Ballyboden. We fought for this. It took a decade to get this over the line. It is a spanking new facility. I do not think that GPs are in situ there. That is an issue. I would appreciate if I could get a note on that.

I would like to address my final question to both the Secretary General and the CEO. What is the percentage of unpaid hospital fees? They were abolished yesterday for everybody.

Mr. Paul Reid

With regard to our work with general practice, we hugely value the work GPs do. They are a core part of what we mean by enhanced community care. Where we have GPs in primary care centres, there are very different models and there is very different footfall going to them and they are much more successful. I am not familiar with the Ballyboden case, but we will get the Deputy a note on it.

Generally on GPs, we have worked closely with the Irish College of General Practitioners. We are looking at the pipeline of training coming through. Concerning the investment in general practice, particularly through Covid-19, the latest 2019 agreement provided for an investment of approximately €210 million in general practice. We are concerned, as the Deputy said, about the pipeline and what is coming through. We are beginning to see some positive indications of the pipeline.

Approximately 120 GPs were coming through training ten years ago. Some 259 completed the training last year. Approximately 875 doctors are currently in the three-year training programme.

How many of them emigrated?

Mr. Paul Reid

We have some figures to suggest that a significant proportion - a vast majority - of the GPs who emigrate actually come back within a three-year period. We are happy to share the report with the Deputy.

How many of them emigrate after graduation?

Mr. Paul Reid

I do not have the figures just now. What I can say is that 875 are in the pipeline. We want to get that number up to 350 per year. That is the investment strategy that Mr. Watt has spoken about. There are 2,500 GPs on the GMS and another 540 provide publicly funded services but are not necessarily on the GMS. There are approximately 24 vacant posts on the GMS nationally. We are working with the Irish College of General Practitioners, ICGP, on this. It is our concern-----

It is important to be aware of the geography. For older people, losing a GP is significant because a personal relationship can go back over a lifetime, with their children also having been under the care of the same GP. Having to move on can be difficult.

When Mr. Reid spoke earlier about the enhanced community care programme, he said that "its objective in line with Sláintecare, is to deliver increased levels of healthcare locally with service delivery reoriented towards general practice, primary care and community-based services". I would like this committee to take up this theme later in the year. Pharmacists proved their worth during the pandemic, but they are not included in this. Their union representatives are good people. If I walk into a local pharmacist with an insect bite or something like that, he or she can identify it and probably accurately diagnose it but he or she cannot give me anything for it. I have to go to my GP. There is certainly a role for pharmacists in the roll-out of free contraception in the community and they have demonstrated this. Without them, the vaccination roll-out would not have achieved the targets that were achieved. However, they are not included in this. I think they are keen to play a role in what I would loosely call community medicine.

Mr. Paul Reid

We see a value for them in this regard. As the Deputy mentioned, they more than demonstrated their value in the vaccination programmes. They play a key role in flu vaccination programmes. Not all of them participate, but we would like to see more of them participating and we are encouraging more of them to do so. We see them as part of the primary care service we provide.

What are the obstacles to their participation in things like the free contraception programme or diagnostics? I am referring to a range of what a lay person might call simple things, which they are qualified for and are perhaps done by pharmacists in other countries.

Mr. Paul Reid

The Irish Pharmacy Union, IPU, says that providing community skills resources is a challenge for them as much as it is for us. Covid demonstrated exactly what the Deputy has stated, which is that the public expect us to operate as one integrated health system. During Covid, we demonstrated that the public values this and that this works. We see them coming more into the provision of primary care services.

I will come back to that theme. It is something I would like to see. I ask the Secretary General if he can tell us anything about the geography of the RHAs. Is that already set in stone? Is the work that has started on the development of a population-based approach a first? It is alarming to me. I presume it is one of the reasons Mr. Watt was brought in. Is this the first time such an approach has been taken?

Mr. Robert Watt

The geography of the RHAs is set out. We can circulate it again. The areas have been agreed and the counties to be covered in each of the regions have been set out. That is broadly agreed. There are many different ways of cutting this, of course, but I think it is accepted as the best we can do.

As regards resource-based and population-based budgeting, it is an attempt to look at-----

Is it a first attempt?

Mr. Robert Watt

I am not quite sure if it is a first attempt because we had the health boards in the past. They received an allocation and presumably population and need was one of the drivers, but this is an attempt to set it out in a more systematic way. It follows on from the work of the Dáil committee that led to the production of the report, which asked what the population contribution per area should be, how that should vary by need, because different areas have different needs, and how, even though, of course, some services are provided nationally and straddle many different regions, we can have a different way of budgeting and a better way of allocating resources.

We have been involved in this over recent months in preparation for the budget which was announced yesterday. At the moment we tend to allocate based on national policies, given the way we talk about mental health, disability, acute, primary, etc. so it is a case of deciding the way to allocate in a region to take account of people's needs across different elements of the service.

Other countries are doing it, and in terms of the presentation members had in the Department a few months ago, and there was some discussion about this and I will come back to it, I think we need to try to set out in parallel before we actually do this to see how the two systems of budgeting will work and to see how it relates. It is a way of trying to ensure the resources follow the need.

Of course, this is not a perfect science but we are trying to ensure the money is being allocated where it ought to be allocated.

Mr. Paul Reid

We are not waiting for that definitive model. We are carrying out what we call activity-based funding models. It is a look at activities and the outcomes across acute and community services and that feeds into the population-based model and demographics.

To go back to the CEO, he said-----

Mr. Robert Watt

Deputy Lahart mentioned GPs. To give the numbers again, and we will circulate this note rather than reading out all the numbers in detail, in terms of the number of GPs in the training programme and then coming into the service, there is an increase of about 10% per year. For this year it is projected there will be 184, and by the end of this decade it will be up to 324 each year. There is a very significant increase in the numbers training and now entering. I know and accept the question - I think it was from Deputy Burke - about people leaving, and there is a large percentage of GPs - I think about 35% - who are over 55. However, we are training as quickly as we possibly can and that will start to have an impact.

As I said at the start, in simple terms we need to train more doctors. Last year we offered 720 places in September 2021 to EU citizens and that is increasing by 60 this September. We have plans to increase that by 200. We need to do much more than that. That is a real issue for the schools and is a real policy challenge, how we increase that capacity. It might need the establishment of new schools and new ways of accessing training places. It is a big challenge for us but we need to do it because we just do not have enough doctors.

Okay, and that is one of the key themes coming from today. I have a final question. The CEO said that additional longer term investment proposals totalling €124 million have been submitted to the Department of Health to support the implementation of modern scheduled care pathways and a number of hospital group priority investments to address current capacity gaps. The Government allocated €350 million in budget 2022, which Mr. Reid looked for to meet the plan he had to address waiting lists, and that was a once-off payment-----

Mr. Paul Reid

A combination of once-off and recurrent.

How much of it was recurrent?

Mr. Paul Reid

If the €350 million is broken down, €150 million of it was the National Treatment Purchase Fund, NTPF, and €200 million was HSE, and that was at the top level. As part of that there was some one-off funding, but in terms of making longer term, sustainable impacts on the waiting lists, part of it will be recurrent, which is what will carry forward into next year, to recruit specialists and address some of the specialist waiting lists we have. That will require funding into next year. That has been part of the dialogue and submission we have part of the Estimates process. Some of it does carry into next year and lead current funding for next year.

Regarding that waiting list plan that was published, Mr. Reid published a waiting list action plan in February and said that was the product of extensive engagement between the HSE and the Department of Health, so I presume some allocation to that was a final sum to deal with the issue.

Mr. Paul Reid

Yes, it was.

It just seems Mr. Reid underestimated what was needed for 2022 and 2023 and is now going back for more.

Mr. Paul Reid

No. Any approach in addressing the waiting lists on a sustainable basis will need multi-annual funding, which is what the Minister has made a submission on, and we will see the final breakdown on that.

Addressing things like new clinical pathways, for example, will need certain resources and specialties that recur into next year so it is not just one-off funding required.

Was that not anticipated in the waiting list action plan that agreed with Government and which Government funded?

Mr. Paul Reid

It was, but as you get into the actions and as you define the actions there is a recurring element that had to be incorporated into the Estimates process, which the Minister has brought through and there is funding for it next year as well, so there is a recurring element into 2023, and there will be into 2024.

Ms Yvonne Goff

There are about 45 actions in the action plan and one of these is to do capacity and demand analysis. We have completed the capacity and demand analysis and identified all the specialties that need one-off backlog clearance and all of the ones that need recurrent gap investment. We have completed that and we have submitted the 124 million to look at the specialties that make up approximately 90% of the waiting lists that have a recurrent gap and need multi-annual investment. Therefore we have two approaches, one is to clear the backlog with a one-off payment, and also seeking recurrent, to have sustainable solutions to not only achieve Sláintecare targets but to maintain them as well.

I call Deputy Róisín Shortall.

I thank the witnesses for their presentations. It is very hard to comprehend a situation where the State is spending €23 billion on the health service and we find ourselves year on year with money allocated for different services and the HSE incapable of recruiting people because there has been little or no forward planning in relation to workforce. It beggars belief that given the level of unmet need in the country, our biggest problem in the health service is that we cannot get staff. We are talking about international recruitment but there are ethical issues around international recruitment. There is also the madness in what is happening with hospital doctors, where at huge expense we are training them to leave this country, and then trying to scramble around to get foreign doctors to keep our service together. One has to ask why there is not a clear, robust workforce plan for this year, for the next five to ten years and a plan for the next 20 to 30 years. All of these projections are available in terms of population growth, the kind of numbers that will be needed across health and social care. Why is that not being done and who is responsible for not doing it? That is the question. It is the most fundamental thing you would have in a major organisation with that kind of massive budget. I just cannot get my head around it. Why is it not happening? We have heard comments about how we have succeeded in getting an extra 60 medical places. This should not be a concession. We have succeeded in getting some extra places but it is not anything like enough. That is paraphrasing what has been said by Mr. Watt. Why is it not enough? Why have we not got the figures set out over the next 20 to 30 years?

I spoke to the Minister for Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science, Deputy Harris, about this, because I am gobsmacked at the extent to which our health service is not functioning and so many members of the public are denied access to essential health and social care because of the failure to plan. He said he is more than happy to extend the number of places in third level colleges if he gets some figures from the Department or the HSE. There are four key areas that need attention and we should be able to set down on paper what the needs are and what the plan is to ensure adequate numbers of staff over the coming years. I do not think such a plan exists. There is no evidence of it, and I have to ask why that is the case. In any major organisation recruitment, forward planning and doing the projections is just basic work.

The first issue is the adequacy of the number of third level places. This is a matter of doing sums and working out what numbers of different categories of staff will be needed over the coming years. There is then the question of work placements and I would like Mr. Reid to address that issue in particular, because my understanding of the situation is that for healthcare staff work placements are absolutely critical.

They are a major part of the whole training process. My understanding is that, within the HSE, the number of placements has been reduced substantially in recent years. That is causing part of the logjam. Clearly, not much attention is being paid to the work experience of people in the health service, where, for example, junior hospital doctors are leaving this country in droves. GPs cannot set up in practice because they do not have the money behind them, and we were promised salaried GPs. We also know that many people right across the health service do not have very good experiences of working within the HSE and prefer to go to other places where there are functioning health services.

The other issue that needs to be addressed is CORU; I think CORU has to be seen as part of the problem. Why is it taking so long to recognise people's qualifications? There is a whole area there that seems to have been completely neglected in recent years.

There was a time when doctors were seen to be the only people in the health service and should be the key decision makers. They certainly were in a very prominent position in the Department of Health. There was an extraordinary reverence towards them. About ten years ago, there was finally recognition of the important role of nursing and the Chief Nursing Officer was appointed on a par with the Chief Medical Officer. That was a very important development. We know that nurses should be on a par with doctors.

There is another area of staff, health and social care professionals, to which I would ask Mr. Watt to give serious consideration. These are essential people within the health service, especially as we move to implement Sláintecare and a different model of care within the community. There are major shortages of health and social care workers. Some of that has been referred to already, where money was provided in recent years for mental health services and disability services. It is a joke that the money is there and we cannot get the people. I would put it to Mr. Watt that consideration should be given to appointing a chief officer for health and social care professionals, to bring them on a par with nursing and medical professionals. This is going to be a huge area that needs to grow substantially if we are serious about patient-centred care. Has Mr. Watt given consideration to the appointment of such an officer at senior management level within his Department?

I want both organisations to respond to this point. Both organisations, and I would also include the Department of Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science, should be on top of this issue. They should have very clear plans for training places, placements, all of those things, and ensuring that when people are working in the service, they are treated properly, so we do not have a situation like what is happening with junior doctors. Why is this not happening? Can both organisations provide an explanation as to why it is not happening? Are there plans to put in place a proper workforce plan?

Mr. Robert Watt

In 2020 and 2021, we had the largest increases - in those two years - ever in the number of people in the health system. I think it was about 5,000 or 6,000 each year. This year, it is looking like 4,000 and a similar, higher number again next year. Over four years, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, there could be an increase of perhaps 20,000 into the health system-----

With due respect Mr. Watt, I am not asking how many have been recruited, I am asking what is the plan for ensuring that there are sufficient numbers of staff available, when the funding is there to recruit them?

Mr. Robert Watt

We have set out the steps. There is clearly an issue, first of all-----

Mr. Watt has not set out the steps.

Mr. Robert Watt

-----there has obviously been a very significant increase in the number of people employed in the health system. The net increase is a fact.

We all accept we need to do better when it comes to training. Mr. Reid, Mr. McCallion and Ms Hoey have given numbers this morning and I have provided some numbers also. For example the number of doctors in training has increased by 20%. We have set out the increase in the number of GPs and we have set out plans for higher education, including for nurses, other specialties and medicine. It is a fair-----

But Mr. Watt caveats that by saying it is not enough. That is the difficulty.

Mr. Robert Watt

I accept it is not enough. It is a big challenge for the system, particularly for the medical schools. It would be interesting to bring in the medical schools and ask them what they can achieve. Deputy Shortall mentioned a conversation she had with the Minister, Deputy Harris and that was a private conversation, but we will follow up with that. If the Minister, Deputy Harris is interested in more places, we will absolutely accelerate because the constraint-----

Does Mr. Watt know how many places will be needed over the next five or ten years? Is that set out on paper?

Mr. Robert Watt

Absolutely. We recently published reviews which set out the numbers. We need to double the number of undergraduates coming into the system each year.

Is that across all disciplines?

Mr. Robert Watt

That is in medicine and we have set out the numbers for nursing as well. It is not quite double. There are clearly elements of the plan which accept in the past there was an absence of planning. I agree it is not acceptable that we are recruiting people internationally. We need to train more of our people to work in the health system.

How many questions will Deputy Shortall ask? Mr. Reid must also respond.

Mr. Robert Watt

Maybe Ms Kenna can provide the numbers of HSCPs.

Ms Rachel Kenna

We have done some preliminary projections regarding HSCPs. We are aiming for a 10% increase across a number of targeted courses such as those for physiotherapists, dieticians, podiatrists, speech and language therapists this year and working over the next five years we aim to have a 50% increase across the range of healthcare related courses for health and social care professionals.

Have those places been secured?

Ms Rachel Kenna

We have had an increase of 200 places for health and social care this year-----

For the coming years have places been secured?

Ms Rachel Kenna

We are working with the-----

Does Mr. Reid want to contribute?

Ms Rachel Kenna

We are working with the Department of Higher and Further Education, Research, Innovation and Science on the actual increases that will be required across the different courses.

Can Ms Kenna provide the documentation to us on that?

Ms Rachel Kenna

We can, certainly. We will send a paper to the committee on that.

Mr. Paul Reid

I know we are tight on time so I will be brief. To reassure the Deputy, there is a forward planning function and strategic planning function within the HSE. We would not have been able to recruit - and I know she is not interested in the numbers - but for us to stand alone in any given year and just stay net or stay the same, we need to recruit 10,000 people. We have recruited 15,200 people since January 2020 above that each year. We require 10,000 to stand still, but have achieved a 15,000 net increase. To demonstrate the mix, the strategic element of that has been to get the mix right and better as regards the predominant services. I am happy the mix of recruitment in the HSE has fundamentally changed. That includes 2,300 health and social care professionals, 4,500 nurses and midwives. That is the highest number ever achieved. For the first time ever in the past three years, every graduate nurse is guaranteed an appointment in the HSE. That has never happened before. The mix has fundamentally shifted because of strategic recruitment and forward planning. We have a dedicated unit in the HSE on strategic recruitment. We put in a new recruitment model, which includes a combination of in-house and an outsourced model to help us recruit. We have delegated certain levels and grades within that mix of recruitment to the regions and the CHOs and we engage in forward planning. We have fundamentally changed the recruitment model in the HSE and we would not have achieved the numbers we have achieved without the forward planning function. I want to reassure the Deputy that it exists.

Mr. Paul Reid

There is forward planning, a strategic plan and a strategic recruitment model.

Can Mr. Reid provide the numbers to the committee on forward planning for the coming years?

Mr. Paul Reid

We are happy to give a briefing on what it looks like and the mix of who we are trying recruit this year and next. We are very happy to share that with the committee.

What kind of timeline has the HSE done projections for?

Mr. Paul Reid

We are always looking at a three to five year recruitment process. We are informed by the policy documents Ms Kenna has just referred to as regards the policy papers that are published and the various specialist roles. We put that in place. Obviously it is funded by the Estimates, whatever is funded, but it is not that we just get a number this year and ask how we go about it. We have been at this-----

Three to five years seems like quite a short timeline. Can Mr. Reid provide just one response about the number of work placements?

Mr. Paul Reid

I might ask my colleagues to reply to that as I am not familiar with the issue that Deputy Shortall has just referenced or perhaps I have just missed it. What specific placements?

The reduction in the work placements available within the HSE for people who are in training right across the disciplines.

Mr. Paul Reid

Across the disciplines I would say that we are practically offering everybody placements. Certainly all the graduate nurses all get placements, and health and social care professionals.

Could I have a note on the placements that have been provided this year, for example?

Mr. Damien McCallion

We are trying to grow that in terms of international recruitment and people who have been employed overseas as well. So regarding the adaptation that is needed - Deputy Shortall mentioned health social care professionals - we will see how we can grow the number of places. In nursing it is very strong because of the historical investment that is there.

I need to move on.

I thank the Chair. I find the general discussion quite opaque in terms of what is happening following on from that conversation. I will focus on three key roles that I am interested in. I will stay on the children's disability network teams, CDNTs, for a moment, and the issue of health and social care workers. I am trying to understand who is responsible for what I guess in these three cases.

I believe we have 91 CDNTs and at an Oireachtas committee in March, we heard none of them was fully staffed. What is the state of play now?

Mr. Damien McCallion

As we mentioned in a response to Deputy Cullinane earlier we are below 70% in terms of staffing. We have significant gaps in those streams that we are trying to fill in terms of the multidisciplines. They vary around the country but broadly speaking there are still around 30% to 40% vacancies depending on where you are in the country.

Of those 91 are there any gold plate fully staffed CDNTs in the country?

Mr. Damien McCallion

Historically there were some areas in the country that had that model in place already and up and running.

So, the rota is fully staffed.

Mr. Damien McCallion

Well every service will have fluctuations from time to time in terms of vacancies but, broadly speaking, the resource is there.

I take that point. In March the Oireachtas Joint Committee on Children, Equality, Disability, Integration and Youth was told that none of them is at full staff complement. Is there any one that we can say now out of those 91 is fully staffed?

Mr. Damien McCallion

No, none of them is fully staffed-----

Mr. Damien McCallion

-----but what I am saying is that some of them are more mature and more advanced in terms of the numbers and their operations. Before that policy was fully rolled out on a universal basis there were a number of areas that had that in place so they are much closer to delivering the service that we would want for people.

Fair enough and I have recently met some groups, particularly Families Unite for Services and Support, FUSS, in Cork who very articulately, in collaboration with Inclusion Ireland, have talked about the more than 50% of children who are waiting on speech and language therapy. Is there a prioritisation in CDNTs where, when they are understaffed, they prioritise filling particular roles that have a particular impact on children and their development?

Mr. Damien McCallion

I can ask my colleague, Ms Crehan-Roche, to come in in a moment on this as well. Essentially each area will determine the priorities in terms of their needs for their population. The teams are set up to address the population needs. They will determine the priorities depending again on the mix and the nature of the children that are in that area.

I would say that it is also influenced by individual choice. When we are recruiting people will determine themselves to some extent where they will go with their jobs in the market we are in today.

Basically each area will determine the priorities within their team. The construct has been set out nationally in terms of the-----

I am sorry to cut across Mr. MCallion. Would he say that it is fair, in terms of the conversation we have been having in this country about recruitment and retention, that where ratios are low or people are under particular pressure that it is actually a self-fulfilling prophesy? Staff will move out of work models that are simply understaffed or not working. We will double down on that issue surely if we continue to have understaffed CDNTs.

Mr. Damien McCallion

I guess that is why I mentioned earlier that we are trying to prioritise the resource as much as we can into the disability network teams. In terms of international recruitment that is one of the drivers we are trying to look at, accepting that it is not ideal. We want to grow our own people. I will call Ms Crehan-Roche to give the practical experience on the ground if that is okay.

Fairly quickly because I have two more issues that I wish to get to.

Ms Breda Crehan-Roche

We have nine CDNTs across Galway, Mayo and Roscommon. We have some vacancies. The therapists will look at the needs of the individual children and will prioritise them. Obviously priority one will always get top priority. We also offer some group sessions particularly in speech and language therapy, SLT. It is constantly under review and we work closely with our colleagues across the section 38 and 39 bodies.

I take that point but the experience of many parents is simply being years on a waiting list and they see nobody. When it comes to the PDS model in general, is the HSE happy with that model?

Mr. Damien McCallion

Yes, we are committed to trying to roll that out. The Deputy herself mentioned there are huge gaps and we know we need to move to try to fill those as best we can. She mentioned the impact on children, parents and families, which we absolutely accept.

Is the HSE sitting down with families at the moment? Is there a model for forums to sit down with them?

Mr. Damien McCallion

Ms Crehan-Roche may wish to comment on the practical experience on the ground. That model is there.

Ms Breda Crehan-Roche

We certainly are. There is a family forum. We are running those and there will be one per children’s disability network team, CDNT.

Just to be clear, are there outcomes? When the HSE sits down with a family or a group of families and they say this is not working, what is the follow-up?

Ms Breda Crehan-Roche

That would be dependent on the needs. The therapists involved would look at it to see what we can do to address those issues. That would be normal practice.

Does it move up the system in terms of resource allocation?

Ms Breda Crehan-Roche

Absolutely.

Is there a formal model for that from the family forums? Can the HSE provide that to the committee?

Ms Breda Crehan-Roche

I can. I know training is being rolled out nationally. Our intention would be to have all of the family fora up and running. Again, families know their children better than anyone, which is very important. That is a priority.

I want to move on to access to echocardiograms. I am sure the witnesses are all aware of the Croí report put out in the last two weeks, which showed that 80% of public hospitals do not offer a direct line from a GP to an echocardiogram, so people have to wait for six to 12 months, if they are lucky, to be referred to a cardiologist in a public outpatient clinic. This obviously puts more pressure on our outpatient clinics when what we could do is have a cardiac physiologist take on the echocardiograms and shortcut that. My question is for both groups. First, are we doing that and who is responsible for that? Second, there seems to be an issue around training and ensuring that the training needed for echocardiograms is fully integrated with the cardiac physiologist training. I am trying to understand who is responsible for this, who is responsible for setting up the referral pathways and who is responsible for ensuring that the training is correct and that the number of staff available is correct.

Mr. Damien McCallion

I will give an overview. I am broadly familiar with the issue, if not all of the detail. I know that within our chronic disease management model, part of the enhanced community care is that there would be cardiac investigations, and there are some parts of the country where that has been undertaken already very successfully.

Yes, there is a pilot.

Mr. Damien McCallion

It is more than a pilot in the sense that it has been defined as the model. There are some areas where that has been rolled out and the intention is to extend it. The Deputy referred to the challenge in getting that out in regard to some of the training and other issues but I have seen it in operation in the western area and in a number of other areas. The plan would be to extend that out. In some cases, the HSE will directly provide it and, in other cases, we contract that service as part of contractual arrangements we are putting in place. Essentially, the model is clear-----

Excuse me, who is that contracted to?

Mr. Damien McCallion

In some cases, there are providers who can provide that service to us.

Private hospitals?

Mr. Damien McCallion

Yes, private providers who can do that, not necessarily hospitals but community diagnostic-type providers alongside ourselves. Indeed, there are some not-for-profit entities that work on this as well. The model is very clear. We want to take people who require those sorts of cardiac investigations through the chronic disease management hubs, rather than going into busy hospitals. In particular, we might imagine an older person parking in the car park and having to go through an acute hospital to get that test, as someone described to me once.

The HSE has the model but what is the timeline?

Mr. Damien McCallion

We are two thirds of the way through. All of these teams are just being set up. Over the next period of time, I can get the Deputy more detail in regard to the numbers on where that is in place at the moment.

I would love more detail. The work that Croí did is excellent because it had a lot of consultants collaborating with it on this. To be clear, there is an issue around the training of cardiac physiologists. I have very little time so I might add this to my third question, which is really for the Department. My third question is around the training of educational counselling psychology because it is hugely disadvantaged in terms of funding compared to clinical psychology. In Sláintecare, we are moving towards a model where we need tonnes of counselling and educational psychologists.

I am a bit worried by language like “If the Minister, Deputy Harris, is interested, we will sit down with him and talk about this”. Surely the language should be: “The Department is going to talk to the HSE. We will find out what we need based on demographics and then we will tell the Department of Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science what needs to be brought through and how many placements are required.” This is our health service. Do we have a sense that there is more about structure than “We will sit down with the Minister, Deputy Harris.”? There are particular issues here. I am sure every Deputy in the room has a long list of lacunae in the training of health professionals and we could probably give them to the HSE. Is the Department giving them to the Minister, Deputy Harris, and is it more structured than “If he is interested, we will sit down with him”?

Ms Rachel Kenna

Yes, it is more structured than that. We have a number of policies in development that identify deficits in our training capacity to support our workforce development. From the medical point of view, we have covered that quite well but we can give the Deputy the detail on it. On nursing and midwifery, there are recent publications that show where we have to increase our numbers. In particular, midwifery is an area where we know we have to double our numbers in undergraduate training. Across the health and social care professionals, we have done a lot of strategic work with the Department of Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science in specific areas, such as physio, speech and language, dietetics and podiatry. These are areas where we know there are significant deficits in training.

I do not mean to cut across Ms Kenna but I am out of time. I just want an answer on that particular issue. It is not about access to training and it is not the type of training; it is literally that the funding model follows clinical psychology and it does not follow educational or counselling psychology. Our model of care has now changed. Sláintecare changed everything but we have not changed with it. Has the Department considered that we need to change the funding model for educational and counselling psychology?

Ms Rachel Kenna

I do not have the detail on the actual funding model but we can send that.

I ask the Department to go away and look at that. There is huge frustration among professionals around this. We need to have these people in schools and in all sorts of situations. We cannot continue to focus solely on clinical psychology.

Ms Rachel Kenna

The Deputy is right. There is an awful lot of early work done on this. We will send the Deputy the details that we have in a separate paper.

Thank you. Does Mr. Watt want to expand on this structure of talking to the Minister?

Mr. Robert Watt

Obviously, I do not agree with the characterisation. We have been engaging with the Department of Education particularly intensively over the past number of years to improve the training places. It was a question in response to whether we can do more and the constraint has been the capacity within the medical schools. If the Department of Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science is in favour of more places, we would absolutely be in favour of more places. It might be an idea to hear from the schools themselves, invite them in and ask them to talk about the issues they face, the capacity and what is the issue if they cannot increase the number of places. We would increase them massively. We want to do more than the 60 this year and we want to do more than the 200 that we have. We are looking at other options outside of the existing schools to see if we can grow. We are absolutely in favour of whatever option can increase it.

Thank you. I call Deputy Gino Kenny.

My first question is in regard to the pandemic recognition payment and it is probably a question for Ms Hoey. Overall, we all welcomed that front-line workers were going to be rewarded for their service during the pandemic but the roll-out has been quite haphazard, to say the least. Obviously, workers who were in that kind of environment have still not got the payment, which is bizarre. Why did it need a third party in the tendering process to administer the payment to section 39 workers and other workers who are on the front line? I do not understand why that had to happen.

Ms Anne Marie Hoey

In regard to HSE staff and section 38 staff, our own staff are directly on our payroll and we have direct links with the section 38s under the service agreements. Therefore, we had direct visibility in terms of who was eligible for the payment as per the criteria that had been set out and we were able to put in place the payment quite quickly.

As mentioned earlier, 123,000 staff have received that payment at this stage. That number seems to be peaking at that level now and the numbers in the last couple of weeks have reduced to just a trickle. Regarding the third-party agencies, we do not have the same relationship with those agencies in that we do not have visibility of their staff by staff member. We have service level agreements in place with those agencies for the provision of a quantum of service in return for an annual fee or amount of money that is provided. When making the payment to the staff in those agencies, as we do not have that direct relationship we have to engage with them around which of their staff are eligible for the payment. They would have to provide those details to us at a staff member level, as well as the number of staff and so on. When we have that level of detail we will be able to make the payment to the agency and it in turn can make it to the staff member. It is just because of that gap whereby we do not have that direct relationship on our payroll system with those staff.

I am sure Ms Hoey can understand why workers would be extremely frustrated, to say the least. The goodwill from the gesture has gone out of it in some ways because it is so delayed.

Ms Anne Marie Hoey

I acknowledge and accept that those staff should get that payment as soon as possible, as our other staff have. The capacity issue is something we identified early on as something we needed to get some support for. As mentioned earlier, we have tendered for capacity support and that will be in place in the coming weeks. We have done some preparatory work within the HSE and with the Department of Health around who the agencies are. The criteria have already been described well at this stage. Once the third-party provider that is going to assist us with the capacity piece is in place, we will start to make those payments as soon as possible.

My second question is on the shortage of consultants in our health service. According to the Irish Hospital Consultants Association, IHCA, there are 900 outstanding vacancies relating to that work spec. That is putting enormous pressure on our health service. A press release from the IHCA a number of weeks ago states that waiting times cannot be tackled until these places are filled. What are the HSE and the Department of Health doing to try to fill these vacancies? There is historical context to this since the financial emergency measures in the public interest, FEMPI, pay cuts and so forth. What are the agencies doing to fill these posts?

Mr. Paul Reid

I will respond to the Deputy first and then Ms Hoey will give some flavour of it. We are anxious to fill any number of consultant positions we have funding for and approval to do. I gave some figures for other medical staff that were recruited but I did not give them for consultants. We have had a net increase of consultants of 506 since January 2020. Sometimes we say we are losing consultants but that is a net increase of 506. It is the biggest net increase in the health service in a long number of years. Looking at the gaps we still have, there are 4,040-odd consultant approved positions and 3,548 of those are filled. Of those filled, 412, or 10%, are filled by temporary staff. Some 270 are newly approved so we are still in an advanced process to recruit. There is a significant extra focus being put on them. The new contract for consultants is a process the Department is leading, with the Minister and the HSE, but the issue we are focused on, particularly right now, is continuing that recruitment. It has been quite significant over the past three years, bigger than it has ever been.

Ms Anne Marie Hoey

As Mr. Reid said, we have over 4,000 consultant posts approved. Some 8% of those are brand new development posts that have been approved in the past couple of years. There is a lead-in time associated with being able to fill consultant posts and particularly the newly-created posts.

With regard to what we are doing, we are improving our processes and the turnaround time for recruitment. We have revised all our processes and reduced the time to recruit by 40% in the past year. We recruit directly through the section 38 agencies and the Public Appointments Service. We can see the benefit of the improved process. In this year alone there has been a net increase of 150 new consultants. That is in addition to replacing the turnover rate that arises. We are also working to improve our international reach with the marketing of consultant posts. All efforts are continuing to try to maximise our recruitment efforts and to fill our consultant posts.

Would Mr. Reid comment on the outstanding grievances from doctors about the FEMPI cuts? This is an ongoing issue. If it cannot be addressed, we will still be talking about it in a number of years.

Mr. Robert Watt

To add to what Mr. Reid and his colleagues have said, there has been an increase of over 500 posts since 2019, which is a 16% increase. The narrative about the health system is always that nothing is happening but that is just not the case. There is an enormous increase in staffing levels and there is also an enormous increase in the number of doctors in training to create the pool of future consultants. The numbers here are quite staggering, with a 42% increase in the number of training places since 2012. Ms Hoey will correct me if I am wrong about that. Around 24%, or almost a quarter, of those are since 2017. They will be, in effect, the main pool of potential consultant posts in the future.

I do not wish to be disrespectful to any group or lobby group but I do not think the debate about the health system should be guided by what press statements are issued. If we had 20,000 consultants, the IHCA would say the same thing, that is, that we need more. I have been involved in issues around health for years, after working in the Department of Finance since 2008 and the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform since 2011. It is the same narrative every year but it needs to be much more sophisticated than that. We need to talk about ways of work and work practice reforms. Dr. Colm Henry is not here today but he is leading on the clinical pathways, which Ms Goff touched on, and improved ways of working, the shift to the left and the embrace of technology. We spoke about this last time. Given demographic change, the demand in the health system is going up by 3% or 4%. That is a doubling of the demand in 18 or 20 years. No country, including this one, will be able to meet those demands by increase in workforce alone. I can imagine that whoever is in these chairs in ten years will be talking about a health system of more than 200,000 people, in reality. However, it cannot just be about that. It has to be about the reforms and the different ways of doing things.

The Deputy mentioned FEMPI and the outstanding issues with the consultant body. We have an independent chair, Tom Allen, and the negotiations are ongoing. We hope to conclude those talks very quickly, by the beginning of next month. That will hopefully draw a line under that and we can move on.

My final question is about the posts that are hard to fill. We all understand there is enormous difficulty not only in Ireland but worldwide in attracting people to any health service. I completely understand that. What does the relocation package entail, for attracting workers and graduates who emigrated and came back and so forth? There are enormous pressures at the moment with the cost of living and staff. What does that relocation package look like for somebody coming back to Ireland or coming to Ireland?

Ms Anne Marie Hoey

The relocation package really is intended to cover the cost of somebody relocating to work with us. It covers primarily the cost of their flights, any registration fees they may have with professional bodies here, and accommodation for the initial four weeks when somebody relocates here. I can provide the detail. I do not have it with me. It equates in the region of €18,000 to €20,000. That is from memory but I can provide the details on that.

These are the initial costs.

Ms Anne Marie Hoey

Yes.

Has there been a big uptake on it?

Ms Anne Marie Hoey

We have a targeted international recruitment of nurses and this year so far 1,232 international nurses have commenced with us. Another 550 are due to commence before the end of the year. Pretty much all of those will be eligible for that relocation package here. We have other health and social care professionals and so on, which were referred to earlier, that we are also recruiting internationally. They too would be eligible for that.

What do the geographical demographics of that look like?

Ms Anne Marie Hoey

Is that with regard to where people are relocating here?

Where are they coming from?

Ms Anne Marie Hoey

The nurses come primarily from India and the Philippines. That would be the primary source of the international nurses.

I thank our witnesses for coming before the committee. I would like to congratulate and thank Mr. Paul Reid for his work in the health services over the past years, and particularly in the face of the Covid crisis. It was an extremely hard call and task. It was fulfilled with great efficiency. It is a great model for the future of the delivery of the health services. I thank Mr. Reid once again.

I want to deal with just a couple of things. What is the health budget at the present time? Would the witnesses remind me? Anybody? Perhaps Mr. Watt would take this.

Mr. Robert Watt

It is €22 billion in totality this year. It will go up by over €1 billion next year and €1.5 billion the next year.

What I am trying to get at is that for a long time there has been a shortfall for the end of the year. There is a shortfall after six or seven months or whatever the case may be. Can we come to grips with that? Can we accurately project what is required to do the job or is it such a floating issue that we cannot? In which case, we are all coming in on the back foot.

Mr. Robert Watt

It is no doubt that our projected spending in the health area, across all the different areas of health spending, is a very difficult thing. From expenditure on PCR to disability services to acute services there is such a vast number of different aspects to it. There are hundreds or even thousands of discrete elements. There is a significant job first of all to set the budget properly, which we hope to do every year, and then to execute it and manage the events during the year, which inevitably will throw the budget off, and then to try to take steps to correct that. This is an ongoing challenge. We all accept in the Department, and I know that Mr. Reid's team also accepts this, that we need to do better. This year, when we strip out the Covid costs and when it comes to non-Covid core spend, there is obviously underspend in recruitment. That offsets some overspends elsewhere in the acute system due to loss of income and more overtime and agency work. We are probably hoping to be more or less in balance when it comes to the core spending, but significantly over in terms of Covid.

When it comes to the imponderables, the floating targets as it were, we should still be in a position to project what the requirement is much more accurately than we do. Other health services in other countries do so to a greater extent than we do. I would like a quick response to that. Are we not competing? Are we not capable of catching up? Are we not capable of projecting the likely threats adequately?

Mr. Robert Watt

Out of a budget of €22 billion, even with fantastic budget execution and forecasting and things panning out pretty much as one would expect, one is still going to have variance around that.

A variance of 1% is €200 million. That is 99% accuracy if there is an underspend. It is inevitable that within the system there will be a variance of perhaps between 1% and 2%. In cash terms that seems like a lot but as a percentage of the budget it is actually not a lot.

Is it not possible to have a contingency figure encompassed in the budget in such a way as to be able to call upon it as required without having to seek an increase in spending?

Mr. Robert Watt

If there is a contingency budget within the health budget it would become a target to be spent. That could be used up within the first few weeks. It sounds like a cynical remark to make but it is not-----

No, it would not be that.

Mr. Robert Watt

-----within the overall budgetary numbers. Yesterday the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform, Deputy McGrath, referred to a contingency to be held centrally in respect of Covid as a once-off. We do not know about Covid and if more spending is required above what we budgeted for. Then a central reserve would be held in the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform or the Department of Finance and the Exchequer would release it then. We have had this debate over many years about whether within Votes there should be an unallocated amount. As the Deputy is aware, given his knowledge of public financial procedures, the Dáil votes on the amounts we expect to incur not the amounts we expect to incur plus some unexpected amount. That would involve change. Perhaps the Deputy would argue that we should go down that road but I am not sure.

What Mr. Watt is saying is correct but in some cases we underspend and in other cases we overspend. That puts on its head the argument that Mr. Watt is putting forward.

Let us move on to something else if I might. In general there are particular pinch points throughout the health services in terms of delivery, whether it is in CHO7, in mental health, and in children and adult's mental health. In other places throughout the country there are other pinch points. To what degree is Mr. Watt satisfied now that these pinch points have been identified and remedied? Is that the first thing that has to happen if we are going to produce smooth delivery of health services?

Mr. Paul Reid

I am happy to take that piece and the previous question that was asked. First of all, in the national service planning process and in the Estimates process we do look at demographics, at existing levels of services and at inflation. All of that modelling is done at the Estimates process and it is further done in the national service planning process in the allocation of funding. Consider in particular the last couple of years and this year. If we talk to people in the NHS in Scotland, in Northern Ireland, and in the UK - and I have spoken to them - and if one speaks to those in the Dutch health service, the reality is that every health service has been hit by some unknowns coming from Covid. First of all there was Covid itself, and the volume of activity it has driven. Second, there is some of the delayed care that we are seeing coming from it. Third, we are seeing a higher frailty level of older persons. I gave a figure, probably last week. I was in the University Hospital Waterford two weeks ago. I walked the wards in a 450 bed hospital where 270 of the patients were over the age of 75. That is what we are seeing, and it would not have been predicted to the level we are seeing. Modelling is being done by Dr. Colm Henry and others in the Department that looks at the frailty rate of a 76-year-old person now versus the frailty rate of a 76-year-old person two years ago. Certainly it has deteriorated. There is modelling that we do but there are things that happen that impact on our services. Certainly with older persons I would say that the biggest challenge we are facing in the health service in the next ten years - not 20 or 30 years - is higher frailty challenges in older persons. Thankfully we have a health system and a country where people live longer than any of the EU averages, one of the highest rates in the OECD and much higher than in the UK. We have longer life, we have higher complexity and we have higher frailty. It is going to put further pressure on the funding streams and the health system.

The only problem with that is I have been hearing for 20 years that 2038 would be the real hit year. The problem still remains.

We are not really catching up on it or passing it by despite that a huge influx of young, tax-paying people into the country came in that period. The incoming population has doubled, to say the least. It goes without saying that the extra tax-paying population who are not retired or on pensions puts the whole structure on its head. More taxpayers are coming into the country than are leaving it. We need to look at that again to see what we are doing to use that influx of a young tax-paying population to deliver services to whoever may need them, without seeming to blame one sector or another on the basis that they are taking up space.

I want to move on-----

Mr. Paul Reid

Can I clarify that in case it is misinterpreted? I have never said that one age profile or another is to blame, under any circumstance. That is not the case. It is a fact of our demographics. In five, six or seven years, we will have more people over the age of 65 than we have under the age of 14. The demographics are clear. I am not trying to relay that it is an issue of-----

Where are the incoming working population who are taxpayers brought into the equation? It is a huge number. I do not see them in this.

Mr. Paul Reid

That is all the modelling of our funding streams.

I do not see them referred to in any of the replies. That does not mean that the HSE does not know about them, although it surely must. The incoming working, tax-paying population has doubled in the last few years.

To move on to something else, there are a number of issues that beset the delivery of health services. I know that Covid is one issue. I think the HSE did extremely well there and a great effort was made. To save the public, we need to get on top of this job and to deliver health services wherever they are needed. In the past month or six weeks, I was informed of an outstanding reimbursement under the hardship clause. Pharmacists were not being paid. I spent four days on the telephone. I explored every possible nook and cranny to find the problem. I eventually found out that nobody was dealing with the situation when the requisitions were made to be passed on for payment. It was eventually sought, but I spent four days on the telephone and made about 70 phone calls. That should not happen. What are we doing to eliminate such pinch points? It appeared to be a delay that only affected pharmacists, but it affected the patients in a serious way.

Mr. Paul Reid

We have a primary care reimbursement service which has been well-resourced, well-funded and well-built over the last few years. Ms Anne Marie Hoey, who is my colleague, ran it for the past few years. I would be happy for her to address it. We put significant resources into refund schemes for general practitioners, pharmacies and patients.

Ms Anne Marie Hoey

It would be useful to get the specific details of the incident that Deputy Durkan is describing. The hardship payment is done between the local health office and the primary care reimbursement service. I have not been working there for the past three years but, as I exited, the plan was to centralise the hardship payment in the primary care reimbursement service. I am not sure how much progress has been made in that regard. It certainly should not take 70 phone calls to resolve such an issue, so it would be useful if the Deputy could provide details. The matter can then be reviewed in the context of what arose.

I resolved the particular problem at the time, but it took me four days to do it. I would hate to be in the position of a patient who is waiting in vain for something to happen. Can I ask one last question?

Deputy Durkan is way over time. I will bring him in at the end if there is time.

I thank our guests. I apologise if I am going over ground that has already been covered. I was called to the Seanad for some business, so I missed part of the meeting. I thank all our guests for giving us the information required by the committee.

My first question is for Mr. O'Dwyer. What is the situation with the report on beds, particularly single beds in University Hospital Waterford, Cork University Hospital and University Hospital Kerry? I think it is called the Arcus report.

Mr. Gerry O'Dwyer

In conjunction with my colleagues in the estates, we commissioned Arcus to produce a report on the estate and the requirement, based on scientific knowledge. It is a UK company which specialises in healthcare consultancy. Its team has about 40 years of experience in global health economies. We engaged it to undertake this work. It met a number of clinical staff working in the system and all the professionals provided input to the work. The idea was to conduct a health planning process to strategically examine current and future capacity requirements in a number of hospitals. We started in Waterford. That will probably be completed in the next two to three weeks. We finished our reports on Cork University Hospital and University Hospital Kerry. We will carry out similar work in South Infirmary-Victoria University Hospital, Mercy University Hospital, and the rest of the group of hospitals. It is important for us to ensure that we align investment decisions with objective planning and real data on demand factors. This is why this work is so important to us. This will help us to work with population health and my colleagues in strategy and planning when looking at demand factors over the next ten to 15 years, working closely with the board and the Department of Health.

I thank Mr. O'Dwyer. Is the publication of the report imminent?

Mr. Gerry O'Dwyer

We and estates will forward the report to the corporate team. I think it will be reviewed by the board and, if appropriate, by the CEO. We committed that we would share it with Oireachtas Members in Waterford, Kerry and Cork and take them through the various recommendations in detail. Bear in mind that this report will cover a 15-year period. There may be some amendments or adjustments in that time. We are linking in with health demands. We are taking on board the outcomes of the work we are undertaking in Sláintecare. We are putting it all in the unified model as much as we can. I think people will be pleased with the outcome. There has been holistic engagement by many people in estates and clinical staff. The views of patients are important to us too. We want it to be patient-focused.

We want to be sure that the buildings represent new ways of working, both for inpatient and outpatient services. We want to ensure that we are able to accommodate the various specialties in particular areas, with the necessary diagnostic supports and so on feeding in to ensure that the pathway of care is smooth for patients and staff as we progress through those developments. We are enthusiastic about it. I think everyone will be pleased with the work. It is part of our policy to implement Sláintecare with a seamless service. That is what we want. We want to ensure, as part of this, that services currently delivered in the hospital can be delivered in other facilities in a much safer and more sustainable way, so that patients only have to come into hospital when appropriate.

That is the model and that is the thinking around Arcus. It has also factored in the potential for an elective hospital in the region, which was mentioned by Deputy Burke earlier.

That leads me on to my next query, although it might have been touched on in my absence. I wanted to get an update on those elective hospitals. If it was covered earlier, I can check the Official Report, but if it was not, Mr. O'Dwyer or one of his colleagues might give us an update.

Mr. Gerry O'Dwyer

I think the Secretary General covered that comprehensively, so I will leave it because I do not have anything to add.

I thank all our guests for coming in today. I echo what has been said about Mr. Reid and thank him for the work he has done as head of the HSE. He showed incredible leadership at one of the most challenging times in living memory and the country is indebted to him for that. On my own behalf and that of Fine Gael, I acknowledge what he has done.

That leads me on to my first question, to the Secretary General. How is the recruitment process for a new CEO of the HSE going? When is he expecting to be in a position to make an announcement? Is the package similar to the one the outgoing CEO is subject to or is it different in the hope of attracting a new CEO?

Mr. Robert Watt

Obviously, Mr. Reid is not easily replaceable but we are trying and we are engaged in a process. A search company has been engaged for the past four or five weeks and we posted an advertisement in the newspaper last Friday. The package is comparable to what was agreed previously.

Last July, the Minister for Health announced that the catch-up programme for every woman under the age of 25 who had not availed of the HPV vaccine would free of charge, but a number of people have contacted my office to say that is not the case. Where exactly are we with this? Is it free of charge or not and, if it is not free, when will it be?

Mr. Paul Reid

We do not have to hand the figures for the HPV vaccine but I will revert to the Senator shortly with a note on the take-up, the process and so on. We are putting a strong focus on it in our screening services, with communications about it.

It is critical that this happen as soon as possible, so I ask Mr. Reid to prioritise it at the upper level.

Will Mr. Watt outline whether the Department has kept within the health budget or whether there will need to be a supplementary budget for 2022? If there will need to be a supplementary budget, how large will it be?

Mr. Robert Watt

There will need to be a budget for the higher-than-expected costs regarding Covid. I think about €1 billion in supplementary will be required, although I do not have the exact numbers with me. There are moving parts and it depends on how Covid behaves over the next few months and the remainder of the year. As I mentioned earlier, in terms of core spending, there are some underspends on staff recruitment and they are offsetting some of the higher spends elsewhere. The core spending is broadly in line but, obviously, we still have a number of months to go this year. A supplementary budget will be required, primarily due to Covid.

In that case, had the Department succeeded in recruiting all the people it had hoped to recruit – sadly, it was not able to do that - a significant supplementary budget would have been required.

Mr. Robert Watt

Not necessarily, because some of the overtime and the agency staff might make up for gaps that are due to the fact we have not been able to recruit. It does not correspond across exactly. Moreover, some of that spend in the main budget of the HSE too is Covid related because in the early part of the year, when Covid was significantly impacting on the hospitals, that led to a lot of employees being out sick and needing to be covered. It would not directly correspond. There would probably still be an overrun, but not to the extent that would exactly match the underspend arising from the staff costs.

The estimate at the moment is an additional €1 billion.

When is the Department going to announce the winter programme? What scoping or modelling of projections has been carried out as to how bad it is going to be? What kind of money are we looking at for the programme? People are worried and anxious. I come from the mid-west, as our guests will be aware. The CEO and other representatives of the mid-west hospital group appeared before the committee last week. There is much concern, particularly in my area, about trolleys. Will our guests share with the committee some information about the winter programme?

Mr. Robert Watt

Nobody knows the demand we are going to see during the winter. That depends on the prevalence of various respiratory diseases. The flu season in the southern hemisphere was quite severe this year and there is always the potential for Covid to re-emerge. We are anticipating a difficult winter. As Mr. Reid and the team can confirm, we have had a high level of attendances and admissions in emergency departments during the traditionally quieter times of the year and that reflects the higher population over the age of 75 with greater needs and higher levels of frailty. Nobody can predict the demand but we expect it will be higher, which will add pressure.

The teams, particularly Mr. Reid, Mr. McCallion and so on, are working intensively to prepare for this. A plan is in draft and the Minister hopes to bring it to Government next week or the week after that for publication as soon as possible, given the winter season is starting and the cold is starting to set in. There are two aspects of the plan, namely, the traditional winter planning, for which there will be additional money, which the Minister mentioned yesterday in the budget, and the benefits from the higher recruitment and increase in capacity we have seen in recent years, which will help the system in responding. In addition to the traditional winter plan, the CMO is making recommendations to the Minister in regard to the vaccination policy and measures people can take to keep themselves safe during winter.

There is a variety of measures, with a significant endeavour to mitigate the effects on the system as best we can. In all likelihood, there will be significant demands and difficult moments over the coming weeks and months.

My final question is for Mr. Reid. How are the stocks of the flu vaccine this year and how are we doing with stocks of Covid-19 vaccines? Will he reassure people about the flu vaccine? There was a problem with it last year and, obviously, the Covid-19 vaccines are very important.

Mr. Paul Reid

I thank the Senator, including for his earlier comments. We are sufficient with stocks we ordered for the flu vaccine much earlier in the year. The flu campaign will start on 3 October, early next week, and there will be a dual campaign relating to Covid, with the new multivariant vaccine that is available, and the flu vaccine. We have a number of media communications programmes to encourage and strengthen uptake. We are more than sufficient in terms of supplies of both the flu and the new multivariant Covid vaccines.

I wish Mr. Reid well in the next chapter of his career and life and thank him for his service. I hope that nothing we in this committee said pushed him to leave early. If it did, we did not mean it and it was said in the best interests. Does Mr. Watt have an interest in applying for the position of CEO of the HSE? That is one question I have.

Last year, we discussed the winter plan. One in eight people was on a trolley in University Hospital Galway and there was no provision of acute beds. In the intervening period, has there been any planning for additional acute beds in Galway for the coming winter?

Mr. Damien McCallion

I might make a couple of broader points about the winter before specifically commenting on Galway. There were elements of bed capacity in the winter plans of the past two years and through the 2022 service plan. The total number of beds funded across that was about 1,150, of which more than 900 have been delivered. A further 154 will happen before the end of the year and the balance in 2023.

Turning to University Hospital Galway, throughout the Saolta University Health Care Group, 83 additional beds are planned, of which 12 are due to open. I do not have the specific figures for Galway hospital but Saolta as a group, as the Senator will be aware, covers the hospitals in Castlebar, Portiuncula, Sligo and Letterkenny. I can revert to him with the exact numbers for Galway hospital.

Alongside acute bed capacity, one of the areas of focus for the winter is the vaccination which, as Mr. Reid said, is crucial. We saw the impact of low vaccination rates in our hospitals with Covid-19 during the pandemic so we are really urging people to get vaccinated. We have a big campaign starting around that. The second area is acute capacity but also the community bed capacity. The third piece then is to leverage some of the existing investments we talked about earlier in terms of the community with the older persons teams, in particular, and our chronic disease teams. Fourth, we are looking to put in additional capacity and resource for simple things that can sometimes clog up the system or packages of care, aids and appliances, which are things we know we need to use more of in the winter. They are also forming part of the final discussions to which the Secretary General referred. Lastly then we have looked at initiatives within each geographical area, which may vary.

My colleague, Ms Crehan-Roche, in Galway may also want to comment on this in terms of the other local resources that would most help make the maximum impact in what we know may be a very severe winter this year. We are trying to plan for the worst-case scenario as best we can but it is more than just acute bed capacity. We are working with Galway regularly. Ms Crehan-Roche might want to comment on one or two of the specific local initiatives in Galway as well.

Ms Breda Crehan-Roche

I thank Mr. McCallion. We work very closely with our colleagues in the Saolta University Health Care Group with regard to step-down beds, respite and transitional funding. We have ongoing communication with them. We also work very closely with the private nursing homes with regard to beds. That is an ongoing issue. There are daily numbers on beds, vacancies and visibility. We work very closely on that. We had a very good meeting with Nursing Homes Ireland recently as well. It is, therefore, an ongoing process. We also have the integrated care programmes for older people, ICPOP, teams, the frailty at the front door service and also outreach clinics in relation to keeping people from having to go into the acute services they would be seeing within their communities in the enhanced community care, ECC, ambulatory hubs.

I thank Ms Crehan-Roche for that and for the meeting we had on Monday with all Oireachtas Members regarding Clifden District Hospital, which is connected to workforce planning. Talking about the winter programme, we have seen referrals from Galway University Hospital, GUH, to Clifden District Hospital dry up over the last period. In the main, we do not have a physiotherapy service in Clifden because of difficulties in recruiting somebody for that position or retaining somebody in that position. The physiotherapist left in 2021 and has not been replaced. This is having a knock-on effect where we have a facility with staff, beds and capacity. However, because we do not have physiotherapy, we have seen referrals dry up, and this is putting pressure on GUH. This is a perfect example of recruitment and workforce planning impacting down the line to the acute hospital.

Ms Breda Crehan-Roche

As the Senator said, we had a very good meeting. We will also have a following meeting in the middle of next month with all of the political parties and local politicians.

With regard to the physiotherapist, yes, we have had difficulty. What we are trying to do is be creative and look at ways. Unfortunately, even when we offered the person a position in Galway city with outreach to Clifden, it was not possible. We have to provide this, however. That is where the ICPOP teams come in, and we will be looking at a hub-and-spoke model.

We alluded to it last week that we will be providing services in the Clifden hospital. The longer term plan, of course, will be the new community unit in Clifden, which will be a merge of both and have 40 beds. Indeed, that is going to planning very shortly. That is the good news on that. It is, therefore, an ongoing issue and we are constantly keeping it under review. I will just say that everybody who requires respite is in respite in Clifden District Hospital at the moment.

The issue of recruitment is a challenge in some of the bigger population areas like Galway city but it is an additional challenge, in some cases, although perhaps it should not be. One could argue that the cost of living may be somewhat reduced in some of the more rural areas in terms of living costs. Therefore, the package may be more attractive to recruit people. However, there are challenges certainly in Clifden and from what I understand from colleagues, in Belmullet as well, in terms of the district hospital. What can be done to incentivise or be able to better provide staff for these centres? We are talking about areas that are long distances from the next available beds, which would be in Merlin Park University Hospital.

There are costs and stress for families. At the public meeting that we had on Sunday, the local parish priest, Fr. James, spoke about the emotive issues surrounding the end of life and visiting somebody who is in their final hours. Having that person local to their family is important. It takes an hour and a half to travel the long distance from Clifden to Merlin Park.

Services in Clifden are hugely important. There is talk of international recruitment, etc. What can we do to better achieve placements for places such as Clifden that need nurses and physiotherapists?

Ms Breda Crehan-Roche

We are looking at that. We attended the job expo, for example, in Leisureland. We are trying to be creative and entice people back. We were in Birmingham on Monday for the job expo there. We are working closely with colleges and we have meetings coming up in relation to third level institutions. We are looking at all of that. The ICPOP teams, which are consultant-led and multidisciplinary, will be able to assist. It is a question of looking at every possible option. There is an international workforce recruitment plan and we are hopeful that we will get some people there. We are just being very creative. Word of mouth is very important as well.

Mr. Damien McCallion

On the international piece, it is a challenge right along the western and southern seaboard from Inishowen. As the Senator said, equally, the urban challenge is also that world challenge. Sometimes circumstances intervene and, as Ms Crehan-Roche said, word of mouth leads to the identification of someone who has moved away. It may be possible to catch them to present them with an opportunity. We do a similar thing with consultants. When we were looking for emergency department consultants recently, we put out feelers around the world to make contact with people who have roots from Ireland and might come back. It is through many of those informal and formal contexts that we can try to close the gaps in large academic centres and in rural parts of the country.

I will return to the Senator’s question about Galway. I apologise as I should have clarified the matter. There are 12 beds in Galway and ten delivered. However, a change that is happening in the emergency department infrastructure there may facilitate better flow in relation to some of the beds and release some capacity. Although Covid is clearly changed, we still have Covid pathways in hospital. Having visited an emergency department recently, I know we still have to have those separate pathways and testing. It still impacts on our flow in hospitals. Some of that will also help to give some benefit.

On the acute capacity, it is important that we have put in much capacity in recent years. The next jump will be about larger projects that will clearly take a longer lead time. That makes it more important to work with the community on how we can improve the flow of patients in the short to medium term, while, obviously, the bigger capital projects start to develop across the country.

I wish to clarify one point. On acute beds, Mr. McCallion said ten have been delivered. Where have they been delivered?

Mr. Damien McCallion

In the hospital in Galway.

Mr. Damien McCallion

Yes.

Are these beds that were not there last winter?

Mr. Damien McCallion

The 12 beds have been coming through over the past 18 months. They have opened up through that window.

Was that part of the temporary emergency department?

Mr. Damien McCallion

The temporary emergency department is separate. I can revert to the Senator with more detail on that if he wants. Essentially, those beds were part of the national service plan last winter, in terms of the 1,000 beds I mentioned earlier.

Okay. There were not mentioned last year. There was not any mention, as far as I can recall, of 12 beds in the plans as part of-----

Mr. Damien McCallion

I can get the Senator details on that if it helps. As I said, the flow piece on the emergency department is another important cog that will assist in the short term as well.

I have a question before I bring members back in. On recruitment, one of the challenges relates to visas for people from abroad. Has that blockage in the system been sorted?

Ms Anne Marie Hoey

I will have to come back to the Chair with specific detail on that. We certainly work closely through the international agency that recruits on our behalf, which in turn works closely with the various authorities that are necessary to ensure people get here as expeditiously as possible. I can come back to the Chair if there are any specific blockages. Certainly, all of the different agencies we need to work with make sure we get people here as soon as possible.

Does Ms Hoey have any idea how long it takes to get the visa for someone who is recruited? I assume it depends on what part of the world they are from.

Ms Anne Marie Hoey

Yes, it does. It would probably be best if I come back to the Chair with some details. I can come back with some practical examples based on international recruits from various countries and how long it takes to get them recruited.

One of the issues that keeps coming up in the context of health is that of oral care. Again,.there are shortages and blockages within the system. Mr. Watt outlined the number of staff who have been recruited and so on. Is this one of the areas that is being prioritised? People are encountering difficulty getting an appointment with a dentist. There was reference earlier to the difficulty of getting an appointment with a GP. I ask the witnesses to address the issue of oral care and the importance of that.

Similarly, people are encountering difficulties with ophthalmology. There were buses travelling to the North and so on. Again, there are blockages within the system.

The challenge we face as a committee is that we are getting figures from Mr. Watt that are positive regarding the recruitment of additional staff and so on but we are not getting a sense of the gaps within the service. I will give an example. We got a positive message about the number of diagnostic scans but we do not know how many people are waiting on scans. There may be people at home watching this meeting who have been waiting 12 months or two years or whatever it is. There are also the people who go down the private route to try to get a scan and so on. There are a lot of gaps but we are not really getting the sense of that in the picture we are getting. In the context of recruitment, we have heard about the 2,700 people, with 1,100 nurses and midwives. We are getting a sense of from where those staff are coming but there is a gap in the context of other services. That was touched on in the context of speech and language therapy. That issue is raised with all members, as public representatives. One of the challenges in my area, for example, is that a person recruited to work there will be going into an area where there are potentially thousands of people on the waiting list and the system is clearly missing key personnel, with the result that the list is getting ever longer. We are not getting a sense of issues such as that from the meeting. Where the HSE or the Department have teams in place that are working, that is great, but what about the teams that are clearly broken or that have key personnel missing? Is there a different way of doing this type of meeting in future? I am just throwing that out to the witnesses.

Mr. Robert Watt

It may be useful for us to send the committee more detail based on the trends in recruitment and those in training, undergraduate placement and all the various aspects. It might be useful to set that out and then try to overlay it with the waiting lists, that is, in which areas are people waiting. We can link that list to a shortage of professionals to deal with people on waiting lists and then identify the gaps. That is the demand and supply capacity analysis that we have been trying to do and which Ms Goff touched on earlier. Mr. Reid and I will try to collate the various requests from members and come back with a composite note. The next time we meet, then, members may be able to ask about a particular area and point out that we are not doing enough work there relative to the lists. That is, in effect, what we are trying to do with the workforce planning. We can send members more information that might help to give an overall assessment of it.

Okay. At meetings like this, we do not get a sense of the answer to the big question everyone asks, which is whether the system can be fixed. Innovative measures are being taken. Last week, for example, we had people in from University Hospital Limerick, UHL, and they spoke on the big challenge being faced there, relating to senior citizens coming through the emergency department system. We know of the pathway service that has been introduced at Beaumont Hospital and other locations and is being rolled out in different areas. At meetings like this we probably need to hear about schemes that are working as well.

Mr. Robert Watt

Dr. Colm Henry is not present as he has other commitments but I understand he is leading of the reform of the pathways, which relates to some of this, It is about how people can be treated in a different way rather than being referred by a GP to a choke point in the system. It might be useful to summarise some of that at a future meeting. We can work with the committee on it because it might be interesting to see the examples and what the reform programme involves. That is really what it is about - trying to drive the change and the numbers of people who are treated more effectively-----

Mr. Paul Reid

In fairness, at our most recent meeting the Chairman made the same points with regard to getting below the big numbers. There are 617,000 outpatients waiting, 75,000 inpatient day cases and 27,000 gastrointestinal scopes.

We have those figures broken down by hospital, specialty hospital group and community, and some of the waiting lists in the community. That is informing our strategic workforce planning. We are aware of issues in some rural parts of the country in particular, as Senator Kyne raised earlier, where we are having challenges in recruitment. We can, however, give the committee a greater sense or depth in terms of the big list, but also in terms of the level of activity that we carry out every year because sometimes the public do not hear that either. We carry out more than 5 million activities, between outpatients, inpatients, scopes and emergency departments procedures carried out in hospitals. Yes, we have a big backlog and it is our greatest challenge but we are, every year, doing higher and higher levels of activity and it is now about changing it all, as Mr. Watt said earlier. Yes, it is about resourcing, but it is also about changing those patterns. The Chairman referred to the pathfinder service at Beaumont hospital. Pathfinder is being rolled out at UHL, as he stated, and in other parts of the country, as is the whole frailty management piece that Ms Crehan-Roche spoke about. We do not just have pilots, we have pathways that we know work and that we want to roll out across the country as well as recruiting specialists. It is a decision for the Chairman and the committee, but it would be worthwhile to get greater depth on some of that.

To go back to the issue of community care, no matter what kind of community care the HSE can provide, it will not be adequate and a certain number of people will have to be admitted into nursing homes for the care they require. There is a significant gap between what it costs per bed in private and public nursing homes. The latter is, on average, €1,650 per bed per week, while the former is €1,000 per bed per week. Several private nursing homes have closed because it was no longer viable for them to stay open. Where is the Department now in taking account of the new challenges private nursing homes will face with the cost of energy, etc.? When will there be engagement on dealing with those challenges so that there are no further closures?

The second matter I wish to raise relates to workforce planning. There was reference to the shortage of nurses. I understand that some private hospitals are now training people specifically as theatre assistants. Those staff are not qualified nurses but they are specifically trained as theatre assistants. That is happening in other jurisdictions as well. Is that approach being considered?

My final point is that nurses are highly qualified yet they are still doing a lot of work that care assistants could be doing. That is not taking from care assistants. In fairness to nurses, they are well qualified now. In fact, many junior doctors will say it is nurses who are doing an awful lot of their training because nurses have so much experience and skill. Is the issue of nurses' responsibilities and delegating some of that work down to care assistants being considered in the whole realignment? Similarly, is the issue of theatre assistants being considered?

Ms Rachel Kenna

As regards theatre assistants, we are looking at the development of roles that will support nurses, midwives and doctors in practice. As the Deputy noted, theatre assistants are well integrated internationally into acute settings, and other types of assistants into community settings as well. It is part of our strategic outlook in terms of policy direction to look at these and other roles. Physician assistants are currently being trained here through the RCSI and are employed in some hospitals through the HSE. These roles are not new to our workforce planning and they are being considered in that regard.

In terms of nurses being highly qualified, the Deputy is correct. Our success in terms of advanced practice is testament to the skills, knowledge and expertise of our nursing and midwifery workforces. In supporting that, there has been an increase. We have a policy target now of 3% of our entire nursing and midwifery work force being at advanced practice level. This year, with the additional 149 posts that are currently in the process of final recruitment, we will be at 2.25% of our workforce. We have achieved significant growth at the higher level of practice, at the top of the licence for nurses and midwives.

To support that, part of the expert review on nursing and midwifery will look at the implementation of the recent healthcare assistant review that was done in 2019. That is about the support and development of healthcare assistant roles within and throughout the service. We are also working in close collaboration with colleagues in the HSE to develop healthcare assistants through apprenticeship-style training processes to fill and meet the demand of what is now developing through Sláintecare.

What of the issue of the nursing homes?

Mr. Robert Watt

As the Deputy is aware, there have been a number of closures. Overall, there has been a net increase in the number of nursing home places in recent years of about 1,100 or 1,200. There are a number of reasons for the closures. It is not just about money, but money is an issue in the viability of them. In the south east in particular, there have been a number of closures recently. Money was allocated yesterday. I believe that the Minister of State, Deputy Butler, will speak this afternoon about a scheme of assistance to help nursing homes with the higher energy costs. The National Treatment Purchase Fund, NTPF, will be reviewing, once again, the charges that apply. There will be supports put in to help with the viability but clearly, it is a challenge that a lot of providers are facing.

Would Mr. Watt agree that this decision will have to be taken fast, and not in six months' time? The challenges are there now with the increased costs.

Mr. Robert Watt

Yes. There is an allocation to be distributed before the end of this year. The Minister of State, Deputy Butler, has been working on a scheme and may be talking about it in more detail later this afternoon.

I have three people who wish to come back in.

I will take just two or three minutes and leave it at that. I wanted to come back in to get a sense of what the interaction is between the Department of Health, the HSE and the Department of Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science. We want to be successful on workforce planning. We have got some information from Mr. Watt and Mr. Reid today but it would be important to get those detailed notes we were looking for, where we would have the projections of what is anticipated across increased training places over the next number of years. This will be important to give us a clear picture of what is actually happening. I wish to come back to something that Mr. Watt said earlier. Mr. Watt said that even from what he can see from the projections, it still is not enough. That does not seem to be a plan. If it is not enough then it is not acceptable. We need enough. It must be sufficient to meet the demand. The demand is there from demographics and we know how well this has worked out in terms of what the additional demand would be. What is the structure between the Department of Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science and the Department of Health? Is there a high-level group? Do they meet on a regular basis? How often do the two Ministers meet? Is there a forum where all of the stakeholders can meet on a regular basis? What is the structure?

Mr. Robert Watt

Certainly, since my time there has been a lot of engagement-----

I am referring to a formal structure and not ad hoc meetings.

Mr. Robert Watt

There is formal engagement led by Ms Kenna. The Ministers have met and there is a realisation that we needed to be better integrated. I absolutely accept a lot of the points that the Deputies have made this morning about the higher education sector responding ultimately to healthcare needs, and for us to be very clear that these are the growing needs and we need to train more of our young people. In essence that is it. To be frank, this morning I said that we negotiated an increase in the number of places by 200, from 720 up to almost 900. Mr. Reid mentioned earlier the population and the greater frailty of older people. All of the Deputies this morning spoke about individual cases in their constituencies. We understand that and everybody has alluded to it. The reality is that we are going to have to train more doctors. There is no way of getting around this. We must have a step change. What we have tried to do over the past year in terms of getting-----

Can I also add to that? Training them is one thing but retaining them is as important. If we consider the numbers of doctors who have emigrated, where visas were given by the Australian government to Irish doctors emigrating last year, compared 2019, it has increased by about 40%. It is about keeping them here. We have junior doctors who are threatening strike action. There is a myriad of contractual issues in healthcare, which have been in train or in play for many years and there are issues that are unresolved. We can train as many as we like but if we cannot recruit them and retain them, it is equally as challenging. Of course we need to train more.

Mr. Robert Watt

It is something we could set out in the note. A lot of young graduates do their basic training and go away but they do come back - I believe the latest numbers are that 70% or 80% do come back. They go away for a few years but they do return. Clearly there is an issue around retention. There is an issue around the non-consultant hospital doctors and a working group has been established to address various working conditions there, which we are all aware of with regard to hours, rosters, and the moving around in a way that is not necessarily family friendly.

So, absolutely, the Minister has made it clear on this. I will use that dreadful expression "multifaceted", but there are a number of different areas here. To be perfectly frank, I admit that in the past, there has been a failure to properly plan in terms of workforce. Absolutely. We have responded, particularly in the last year or two, but we need to do better. There needs to be a step change, whether that involves a radical expansion of the capacity of the existing medical schools in Ireland, or whether it requires a complete reorientation of the model, or whether we need to establish new medical schools. I was very interested in comments made recently, they may have been by Alistair Darling, but by a former Secretary for Health in the UK. He talked about his ambitions and realised that even when they doubled the number of places there, it still was not enough. The western developed world is thankfully facing a success - as Mr. Reid mentioned earlier - which is our life expectancy. It is currently one of the highest in the EU. The increase in life expectancy is, of course, a positive but it does link to a very different type of model of care than that in the past, and the demands are just very different. We are going to have to do that. We definitely welcome that. Deputy Shortall referred to the commitment by the Minister, Deputy Harris, and we should absolutely engage on that and really have a step change now.

I have a few questions for Mr. Watt. I am concerned about the number of references that Mr. Watt makes to doctors in the context of staff shortages. Obviously, that is a big problem area but many other staff that are critical in the health service. I put the question again to Mr. Watt about having a chief officer with responsibility for health and social care professionals. That area needs to be very much brought up within the Department. The tendency is to overlook them.

I am also concerned that a lot of the responses to questions today were about recruitment. There is a clear distinction between recruitment and workforce planning. It is the planning aspect that we are concerned about here. Who exactly is responsible for workforce planning? I am aware that the chief nursing officer is here fielding a lot of questions but presumably Ms Kenna is more than busy with her area of responsibility. Who in the Department or the HSE does the buck actually stop with for planning? Is Mr. Watt satisfied that there is sufficient capacity to do that necessary workforce planning? I am aware that Stephen Kinsella was brought in for a short period a number of years ago. Does the Department need that sort of specific expertise to deal with this, given the scale of the problem?

Mr. Robert Watt

No, we do not need more expertise. We have the capacity between ourselves and the HSE. We are working on this wider project, which the European Commission is funding, about having a more systematic approach to workforce planning. I believe that we have a reasonably good idea where the needs are, which we have touched on this morning, and where the gaps are, and where we need to increase. Deputy Shortall mentioned the doctors and the pressures across a whole variety of areas. We know where the gaps are. It is a question now of driving the implementation of all the different aspects. I accept what Deputy Cullinane has said about retention, doing better on retention, and doing better with regard to those Irish people who went abroad and getting them back, which we can because there is a pool of those people out there, and to provide more opportunities for our own people to come into-----

Mr. Watt is referencing different things but I do not get a sense that there is any plan in existence or in development. I do not know about other people but from the comments that have been made today, it is hard to take any confidence that Mr. Watt is on top of that. I again put the question to Mr. Watt about the consideration of a chief officer for health and social care.

Mr. Robert Watt

In terms of the chief officer, yes we are going to do that.

Mr. Robert Watt

We will do that but it is not a panacea.

No. I did not say it was.

Mr. Robert Watt

We have had a Chief Medical Officer for a long time but we still have a shortage of doctors. It does not necessarily follow.

I did not say it was a panacea.

Mr. Robert Watt

It might give a nice press statement but it does not necessarily deliver in terms of actually addressing it.

When we actually see a plan in place?

Mr. Robert Watt

As I said, this morning my colleagues and I tried to set out very clearly all the elements of a plan. We have gone through the numbers very clearly, I believe, across all of the different areas. We could summarise it and set out the plan we are implementing for recruitment retention, and more training. We can set it out more clearly. We need to expand on it as things emerge. The European Commission workforce project is putting a more systematic approach to it. It is really about us going through the different steps in the different areas, training more people, retaining them and bringing them in.

There is an element of that there. We can pull it together, and when we do, it might look more like an integrated plan than it might sound when we talk about it.

Surely there should at least be a national task force. This is a national issue and we need a national workforce planning task force in my view. There are many overarching and very strategic issues here. Again, there is no sense here that these are actually being addressed.

Mr. Paul Reid

I reassure the Deputy that this is something on which we are very focused strategically. We take a lot of our inputs from think tank Government policy agencies. The Economic and Social Research Institute, ESRI, most recently published healthcare workforce projections out to 2035. That report was based quite significantly on our own inputs and Department of Health and other policy inputs. It sets out a big strategic direction and has been informing our workforce planning and us putting in place a new dedicated unit within the HSE on strategic recruitment. While I gave numbers earlier, it was to map it out. We did not just work through the past three years and recruit whatever grades we could. We had a plan and a set of percentages by each medical profession and specialty. We achieved in some areas and are down in others but we did not just go at it and get as many as we can. We have had a plan. We take our inputs from the ESRI report for 2035 and the various inputs the Department bring to us.

Why then would the Minister, Deputy Harris, say, if we got the figures from the Department, we could then go about creating those training places.

I need to move on Deputy Shortall.

That Department is a key element.

I apologise to Senator Maria Byrne as I do not think we will have time to get her in today. She is not a member of the committee but she did indicate she wanted to come in.

The Senator may have time as I have only a couple of questions. I have been following the debate from my office. We are talking about Sláintecare and how things are manifesting themselves in terms of the workplace strategy. We had the UL Hospitals Group here last week and the issue of elective hospitals came up again. The group is adamant an elective hospital is needed in the mid-west. I explained to its representatives that this has not been the recommendation from the hierarchy of the HSE to the Government. We have gone over this twice in previous meetings and both Mr. Watt and Mr. Reid said it is for Government to decide, but yet the advisory memo that has come from the HSE says the hospital is not required. It is Dublin, Cork and Galway that are mentioned. I asked for details of who is on that advisory body. Mr. Reid told me he would furnish me with that detail beyond the meeting but I never got it. Will Mr. Reid tell the committee who is advising Government on the location of elective-only hospitals? Who are these people? Are Mr. Watt and Mr. Reid on the body? Second, why is there opposition to there being an elective-only hospital when every single person at management level in the mid-west is screaming out for one?

Mr. Paul Reid

I am not trying to be dismissive of the Deputy but the answer I can recall giving him the last time was that we would jointly inform the Minister of the inputs into the elective hospitals plan. Those inputs have been taken on board. The policy direction is to go through with the three elective hospitals as specified. I have no doubt University Hospital Limerick seeks one and I understand the concern on it but other parts of the country have made the same case to me as well. We have taken all those inputs and, ultimately, it is for the Minister to recommend to Government. That is the legitimate process of our role as public servants and the Minister's role in Government.

To be crystal clear, demands come from everywhere - I accept that - and the whittling down of those demands so that a memo is handed to the Minister and subsequently on to Cabinet comes from the witnesses. Is that correct?

Mr. Paul Reid

It comes through the Department. The Department drafts a memo to Government for the Minister.

It comes from the witnesses' desks to the Minster. That is the chain of command. It leaves their desks last, then on to the Minister, to Cabinet, and Government collectively makes a decision.

Mr. Paul Reid

Yes, and ultimately it would not be from us directly to the Department. There would be a joint collaboration that goes on.

Who whittled down the options and said the mid-west does not need an elective hospital? From time immemorial, Governments have always followed advice, and this is the same for the current Government, the next Government and the ones that have come before and that will come after. There is the so-called permanent government of the Civil Service, and if it advises the Minister to do a certain thing, it is very rare that the Minister does a complete U-turn and pushes back.

I want to know who in that chain of command whittled this down from "Yes, we need an elective hospital in the mid-west" to "No, we do not". Who is that person who struck a pen through a page and said we do not need one?

The Minister is on record as saying that he favours the hospital in Galway.

Mr. Paul Reid

Would it not be uncommon for a Minister not to take the advice? That is a legitimate process, to be clear.

I get that but I think it is fair to ask. This is a public organisation that is publicly funded. This is the HSE reporting to the Minister for Health. Who decided to whittle down all of these regional demands coming in and said there should only be three elective hospitals? It is a very straight question and this is the third committee meeting. I was placated the last time by being told I would be furnished with the answers afterwards. I never got them. I only have one question. Who whittled down demands and options and said there should only be three? That is all I need to know. It is not the Minister, it is not Government, and it is not the University Hospital Limerick management.

(Interruptions).

It is not, Mr. Reid. The memo went in suggesting three. I want to know who whittled down all of these demands and options and said there should just be three. That is all I want to know. Beyond that I have to take it up politically. I only need to know this detail.

Mr. Paul Reid

I am just explaining the process. Ultimately, a memo to Government is brought by the Minister.

It would be very helpful if the memo was circulated to this committee so that we could review it under correspondence.

That is hardly going to happen. I do not think that is going to happen. The Deputy has asked the question anyway.

I will have to wait for the fourth meeting to get the answers.

The Deputy might get answers at the Fianna Fáil Parliamentary Party meeting.

Sadly, we have come to the end of the meeting. I thank the representatives from the Department of Health and the HSE for their continued engagement on this matter. I look forward to further regular engagement with the Department of Health and the HSE on this important matter.

Separately, it is understood this will be the committee's last engagement with Mr. Paul Reid as CEO of the HSE. I put on record the appreciation of the committee for the many engagements we have had with him since 2020, in particular the assistance he provided to the committee during the challenging Covid-19 pandemic. On behalf of the committee, I wish him very well.

Mr. Paul Reid

I thank the committee. I hope both I and my teams have always presented respectfully and done our research to the best extent we could. I certainly have felt it reciprocated.

We wish Mr. Reid well for the future and may he enjoy that family time he was talking about.

The joint committee adjourned at 12.32 p.m. until 9.30 a.m. on Wednesday, 5 October 2022.
Barr
Roinn