Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Seanad Éireann díospóireacht -
Thursday, 23 Oct 2003

Vol. 174 No. 7

Adjournment Matter. - Cancer Services.

On many occasions I have raised the importance of a radiotherapy facility for the Mid-Western Health Board region. I raise it because many people who suffer from cancer require radiotherapy treatment and must travel long distances for it. The expert review group's conclusions were greeted with much disappointment in my area, although from soundings taken in advance of the publication of the findings it was known that the mid-west and south east areas would not get radiotherapy services. The group has focused on what it calls three centres of excellence in locations in Dublin, Cork and Galway.

Regarding the expert review group, many of its findings and research were flawed. For example, within the report itself, an independent study was carried out on the priorities of patients, with travel distance ranked 13th. The Minister regarded this as significant but what he did not say is that many of those interviewed for the survey were from the Cork and Dublin areas, where travel is not a factor because they are near the locations for radiotherapy. The Cancer Care Alliance is composed of eminent people in the oncology sector and it has stated that this analysis, and the component on travel, being used to justify the three different locations and to say facilities were not needed in other areas is a flawed approach. I do not need to elaborate any further as to why the group takes this view.

It is significant to view the breakdown of people who had to travel: those travelling 0-10 miles made up 44%, 11-30 miles made up 16% and 31-60 miles made up 20%. A place like Mount Collins, at the very tip of County Limerick, is probably 180 miles from St. Luke's hospital, Dublin. Ranking the travel factor as justification for concentrating on three locations because cancer patients do not rate the travel distance is flawed and information exists to contradict that justification.

The report also contains justification for concentrating on having four to six linear accelerators in different locations. That contradicts a professional report done in the UK by Calman Hine, which stated that there is justification for having at least two linear accelerators for a population cluster of approximately 300,000. Our disappointment in the mid-west is due to the fact that we have the money available to provide capital funding for the linear accelerators. A very good charitable trust in the area provided that funding and all it wanted was a commitment from the Department to provide the staffing resources for the facility. It was not as if it asked for the capital investment to be provided.

I had hoped the Minister of State at the Department of Health and Children, Deputy O'Malley, would be present. He lives in Limerick and is well aware of this situation and the concerns of people in the mid-west region. He recently floated the idea of a satellite and I wanted to find out what he meant by that – when it would happen, how many linear accelerators would be provided and so on. I do not know if that question will be answered or if I will get the obfuscation that happens here at times; sometimes I wish the Minister would respond before I articulated my concerns so that I could ask questions afterwards.

I have said in my area that Deputy Michael Noonan will be remembered as Minister for Health for the legacy of improvements he provided to the regional hospital. I congratulated the Minister of State, Deputy O'Malley, on his appointment at a council meeting and said if he wanted to be remembered for one legacy after his years of office, he should provide radiotherapy facilities for Limerick Regional Hospital. The mid-west region demands it.

A unique feature of the mid-west region is the lack of private hospitals. In other areas private hospitals operate in parallel with public hospitals and in many cases those with VHI can choose to attend private hospitals outside their own areas. The regional hospital in our area is doing a very effective job and is being developed. It has a modern oncology unit and radiotherapy facilities are an essential component of that unit.

We should think first of all of those suffering from cancer – one in three people will contract the disease in their lifetimes. Many of those sufferers are not able to travel long distances for the care they require. It is recognised by those in the palliative care sector that the condition of a sufferer travelling long distances is aggravated. I saw people's concerns when canvassing for the last election. A mother who had developed breast cancer told me: "I am four miles from Limerick city. Isn't it shocking that I have to go to Dublin for treatment and farm out my four children when I am getting only a few seconds of treatment?"

There is a human dimension to this matter. If one talks to people the most important issue for them is health care. It is interesting that Dr. Watson and Dr. Rogan, two members of the expert review group, dissented from the main findings of the report on the basis of equity and access. A mistake has been made and this issue should be examined again. The population of the mid-west region would justify two linear accelerators and they would be an important component in treatment in the area.

There is extreme disappointment in our area and it is the same in Waterford and the south east. I want to see what is likely to happen in terms of radiotherapy in the mid-west in future.

I support Senator Finucane. This is an issue of major importance to Limerick and I look forward to the Minister of State's reply. I support the request to provide these facilities in the area.

I thank the Senators for raising these matters on the Adjournment and I apologise for the absence of the Minister. This gives me an opportunity to set out his position on the future development of radiation oncology services nationally.

As the Senators will be aware, the Minister for Health and Children recently launched the Report on the Development of Radiation Oncology Services. This report is a most authoritative analysis of radiation oncology and provides a detailed plan for the future development of radiation oncology services here. The Government has accepted the recommendations of this report.

The Government agrees that a major programme is now required to rapidly develop clinical radiation oncology treatment services to modern standards. Furthermore, it has agreed that the first step of such a new programme should be the development of a clinical network of large centres in Dublin, Cork and Galway. The Minister agrees with the report's conclusion that this is the best model to provide a radiation oncology service to the highest standards. These centres will collectively have the staff and treatment infrastructure to permit a rapid increase in patient access to appropriate radiation therapy and will form the backbone of the future service expansion. The development of radiation oncology services along the lines recommended in this report is the single most important priority of the Minister in cancer services in the acute setting.

With regard to Cork, in the short term, the Minister has approved the purchase of two additional linear accelerators for the Cork centre and the necessary capital investment amounting to €4 million to commission this service as rapidly as possible. He has now approved the appointment of a project team to prepare a brief for the rapid expansion of current capacity from four to eight linear accelerators.

With regard to Galway, the Minister also intends to prioritise the necessary resources to ensure that the radiation oncology centre in Galway is in a position to treat patients, commencing in spring 2005. He has also requested the Western Health Board to prepare a development control plan to facilitate the expansion from three to six linear accelerators in the medium term. The Minister will also give early approval to the establishment of a project team to plan this expansion.

With regard to the eastern region, the report recommends that there should be two treatment centres located in the eastern region, one serving the southern part of the region and adjacent catchment areas and one serving the northern part of the region and adjacent catchment areas. The Minister has asked the chief medical officer of the Department of Health and Children to advise on the optimum location of radiation treatment facilities in Dublin. He proposes discussing the implications of the report with the board of St. Luke's Hospital shortly. The chief medical officer will apply the guidelines established by the group. Based on the advice from the chief medical officer, who will be supported by the Department's hospital planning office, the Minister will decide on the location of the services.

Radiation oncology centres will be required to provide services on an equitable basis which will ensure that patients of equal need will have equal access. Geography will not be a barrier to equal access. The radiation oncology centres will provide outreach services to hospitals in adjoining regions. This is currently the case and as more radiation oncologists are appointed, it will be necessary to ensure that there is an equitable spread of outreach services.

It is important to note that in a patient survey carried out on behalf of the expert group, distance to travel for treatment was ranked 13th in order of importance. Highest level of patient care was considered to be the most important aspect of service. The Minister fully endorses the report's findings that equity of access to the highest quality radiation oncology facilities is a right of all cancer patients.

The Government has also decided that in the further development of services consideration should be given to developing satellite centres at Waterford, Limerick and the north-west. Such consideration will take into account the international evaluation of satellite centres, the efficacy of providing this model and the need to ensure quality standards of care.

It is the Minister's intention to develop a national integrated network of radiation oncology. The twin objectives of equitable access regardless of location and an effective national quality assurance programme need to be supported by a co-ordinating mechanism, as recommended in the report. A National Radiation Oncology Co-ordinating Group has been established. The group will inter alia facilitate improved access to existing and planned services. The group will comprise clinical, technical, managerial, academic and nursing expertise from different geographic regions.

The Report on the Development of Radiation Oncology Services in Ireland marks a significant milestone in radiation oncology services nationally and its guidelines and recommendations are essential in the development of these services for cancer patients over the next number of years.

The Minister of State did not respond to the question that was asked. His reply does not answer it, which proves what I have always said about the Adjournment, it creates obfuscation.

Acting Chairman

That is a matter which has been under consideration by the review on Seanad reform. Adjournment debates have been mentioned. Perhaps the point made by the Senator would be taken up with the Clerk in relation to that consideration.

The Seanad adjourned at 12.05 p.m. until 2.30 p.m. on Tuesday, 4 November 2003.

Barr
Roinn