Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Seanad Éireann díospóireacht -
Thursday, 23 Nov 2006

Vol. 185 No. 7

Adjournment Matters.

Sex Offenders Register.

It is urgent that we ensure the regime in place to deal with registered sex offenders in this country is comparable with those in other countries, including the United Kingdom and Northern Ireland. There have been many reports in recent days about registered sex offenders who have come to this country. It is important they are not allowed to come here to take advantage of what they might perceive to be a less strict regime.

I have read various comments by Ministers on this issue in recent days but I am concerned that it appears the onus is very much on the registered sex offender to register with the Garda. I strongly believe there should be a failsafe mechanism so that if they do not register, there is perhaps a penalty or otherwise. We should not have a system of which they can take advantage. I would like the Minister to explain what is in place and what is proposed.

I thank Senator Tuffy for raising this matter on the Adjournment. I assure her that the Government shares her concerns that no opportunity is given to convicted sex offenders to take advantage of any differences in the law and arrangements in place in the different legal jurisdictions.

I will set out briefly the legal position regarding convicted sex offenders who either have served a sentence imposed or did not receive a sentence of imprisonment. The Act of 2001 put in place a notification system under which, to put it generally, convicted sex offenders are obliged to notify the Garda Síochána of where they reside and any changes to their addresses or their names. It is modelled on similar systems in other common law jurisdictions and, in particular, because of our common travel arrangements with the United Kingdom, it is closely aligned to its system. When the Sex Offenders Act was being prepared we not only made a conscious decision to model it closely on the UK model but also to improve it in many respects to take account of our own circumstances. Among the major differences were a shorter period in which to notify the Garda, provisions requiring offenders convicted in Ireland to notify the Garda when going abroad and, significantly, provisions requiring offenders convicted abroad who had a similar notification obligation in their own country to notify the Garda when coming to Ireland, whether to live or for shorter stays.

The UK has since updated its notification procedures and I have instructed my officials to examine our laws to identify what changes would be desirable so that sex offenders would experience broadly similar regimes here and in the UK and, in particular, in Northern Ireland. One change already announced is that failure to comply with the notification procedures will be an arrestable offence. This is included in the Criminal Law (Trafficking in Persons and Sexual Offences) Bill, which is being drafted in the Office of the Parliamentary Counsel and is to come before the Dáil soon.

Another area we are particularly looking at is the position of foreign sex offenders who come to Ireland. Despite recent media reports, it is important to emphasise that we are probably the only country that requires persons convicted abroad of sex offences to comply automatically with notification procedures here when they would have to comply with similar procedures in the country in which they were convicted. In that respect, controls here are already more severe than elsewhere, and it would be wrong to suggest our regime encourages sex offenders from abroad to come to Ireland. However, I am not complacent and, as I have already indicated, we are examining the possibility of tightening even further the operation of the notification procedures in so far as they apply to sex offenders convicted either here or abroad.

Legal provisions are only part of the picture. We also have to keep under review, and improve as necessary, the arrangements and procedures in place to enforce these provisions and ensure the safety of the community. Next Monday the Under-Secretary of State at the Home Office and I will sign a memorandum of understanding on information sharing arrangements between Ireland and the UK on sex offenders. The signing at Hillsborough will be co-hosted by the Minister of State at the Northern Ireland Office. This memorandum of understanding was negotiated between my Department and the Home Office, with input from the Northern Ireland Office. It relates to information about persons travelling between Ireland and the UK who are subject to sex offender notification requirements in their own jurisdictions. It therefore covers sex offenders travelling between Ireland, Britain and Northern Ireland.

The purpose of the memorandum of understanding is that information of this type will be shared between the Garda Síochána and British police forces for the purposes of protecting the public from the risks presented by sex offenders and investigating serious sexual offences. It covers any information necessary to achieve these purposes. It will cover soft and hard information. The memorandum of understanding is part of the work undertaken following the intergovernmental agreement on North-South co-operation on criminal justice matters signed on behalf of the Irish and British Governments in July 2005. Under the agreement, a registered sex offender advisory group has been established consisting of representatives of the Garda Síochána, Police Service of Northern Ireland, Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform and Northern Ireland Office. As part of its work, this group evaluates the potential for sharing information, examining the registration criteria in both jurisdictions for sex offenders and identifying areas for further co-operation. As part of their ongoing co-operation, the Garda Síochána and the PSNI examine on an ongoing basis how the means of transmitting information to each other and the training given might be improved. I commend both forces on their adoption of positive measures to improve the flow of information and expertise between the two jurisdictions.

As a result of the memorandum of understanding, the exchange of such information between the Garda Síochána and British police forces, which has already been taking place for some time, is being put on a formal footing. The memorandum of understanding will be underpinned by further provisions contained in the Criminal Law (Trafficking in Persons and Sexual Offences) Bill. Head 19 of that Bill, which can be viewed on my Department's website, places a statutory obligation on the Garda Commissioner and the director of the probation and welfare service to establish arrangements to assess and manage the risk posed by convicted sex offenders and to share that information with one another. Such information may also be shared with the relevant authority in another jurisdiction in accordance with the terms of any written agreement or understanding for the reciprocal exchange of the information.

The memorandum of understanding with the UK is the first agreement of its kind and will therefore enable such information to be shared with UK police forces, including the PSNI. If the memorandum of understanding operates successfully — I am confident it will — there may be scope for similar agreements with other countries. The two Governments undertake in the memorandum of understanding to discuss its use and effectiveness. In this way, any improvements which might be desirable will be considered.

The law and procedures currently in place provide a high degree of protection from foreign convicted sex offenders who visit or reside in Ireland. However, it does not apply to people who are not required by their native jurisdictions to register and that is an obvious deficiency. We must ask ourselves if it is reasonable that a person who has no registration in his or her country where he or she commits an offence fails to register if he or she comes to Ireland because he or she is ignorant of the law here. It is possible to take two views on that issue and we will examine it to the best of our abilities and see how it can be fairly dealt with. We live in a common travel area in the EU and if somebody from the Czech Republic, for example, is not required to register at home and had never even heard of the concept of registration, it would be harsh to suddenly arrest him or her in Ireland for failing to register. We must think about this.

All laws and procedures must be kept constantly under review to ensure they are adapted and improved in response to developments in society and the behaviour of sex offenders. I attach a very high priority to this work. Given that we live in a society that has no border checks, people can come into this jurisdiction in many places without being checked. Therefore, there is no foolproof system and we can only do our best. We cannot provide a secure border through which paedophiles cannot pass and we therefore must deal with imperfections which arise from the freedom of travel in the common travel area and in the EU generally.

On the Minister's last comment, a person registered as a sex offender in another country should know the significance of his or her moving to another country. We should expect such people to register and the Minister should prioritise his proposal on making it an arrestable offence if people fail to register.

Fisheries Protection.

While I do not claim to be an expert on marine issues generally or razor clam fishing specifically, I have been made aware of a possible issue in Portmarnock in my constituency of Dublin North. The Minister will be aware that fishing for razor clams in certain areas is not prohibited by the EU habitats directive 1992, as transposed into Irish law. However fishing for razor clams is managed as a living aquatic resource under the Common Fisheries Policy. I understand the harvesting of razor clams is subject to legislative controls and the areas in which such harvesting can take place is classified by ministerial regulations. These are applied every six months following consideration of the results of the ongoing sampling programme.

In light of the provisions of the habitats directive, particularly Article 6, and the EU ruling on cockle fishing in special areas of conservation in the Netherlands, should razor clam fishing near Portmarnock be allowed to continue? With the legal precedent set in the EU in terms of the definition of a project, I would like the Department to publish its criteria for the assessment of razor clam fishing adjacent to an SAC and sometimes within an SAC off Portmarnock beach in north Dublin. The Minister might also reassure the House that the Department's inspectorate staff continue to carry out periodic inspections of fishing in this area to ensure harvesting is undertaken in accordance with prevailing regulations.

The Minister of State at the Department of Communications, Marine and Natural Resources, Deputy Browne, regrets that he is unable to attend the Seanad this afternoon but is grateful to Senator Morrissey for raising this issue. Natura 2000 is the EU-wide network of nature protection areas established under the 1992 habitats directive, which aims to safeguard Europe's most important wildlife areas. It comprises special areas of conservation, SACs, designated by member states under the habitats directive, and special protection areas, SPAs, which they designate under the 1979 birds directive. The establishment of this network of protected areas where special measures are taken to conserve biological diversity also fulfils a clear community obligation under the UN Convention on Biological Diversity. The habitats directive identifies some 200 habitat types and 700 species of plants and animals of EU importance. The birds directive lists 181 vulnerable species for which habitat protection through site protection is required. It also recognises the need to protect areas of importance for migratory bird species, particularly wetland habitats.

The long-term conservation of these habitats and species cannot be achieved by protecting isolated pockets of nature however great their individual value. By establishing a network of sites across the full distribution of these habitats and species, Natura 2000 is intended to be a dynamic and living network providing a guarantee for their conservation. Natura 2000 is not a system of strict nature reserves where all human activity is excluded.

On the establishment of management regimes for the sites, in 2005 the Minister for Communication Marine and Natural Resources formally launched the management framework for shellfisheries, committee structures, functions and process. The committee structures, functions and administrative arrangements were agreed following intensive consultation with all those involved in inshore fishing. The network of inshore fisheries local advisory committees, species advisory groups and the inshore fisheries review group are now playing their part in setting the objectives for inshore fisheries, the development of local management plans to deliver these objectives, and the efficient and effective implementation of these plans.

Sound objectives and good management must always rely on solid counsel. We must move from divergence and isolation to consensus and inclusiveness so that inshore fishermen move forward together with a shared vision and objective for the benefit of all. The talents and abilities in the fishing industry, BIM, the Marine Institute, other State agencies and in the Department of Communications, Marine and Natural Resources represent the best available to produce scientifically based management advice on an annual basis. It will be on the basis of that advice, produced in partnership with stakeholders, that we will move forward. The framework is based on working as far as possible on a voluntary partnership basis rather than relying too much on legal instruments to deliver management plans effectively. The Minister of State is convinced that such a partnership provides not only the best opportunity for success but also the only way to capture the spirit of stewardship that resides in all those who make their living from the sea.

In respect of the specific interaction between inshore fisheries and SACs, there is an obligation under the habitats directive to be cautious with respect to the impact of fishing activity in marine SACs. The directive does acknowledge that traditional activity in the SAC may continue provided there is no escalation. With activities that are thought to impact negatively on the structure and function of the ecosystem and especially where the level of such activity may be increasing within the SAC a precautionary approach is warranted. The management advisory committee considers the impact of the fishing activity on the environment generally and more specifically when that activity occurs within an SAC. Fishery management plans are drafted that consider the impact of the fishery on the target species but also develop particular environmental objectives that will aim to minimize the impact of the activity where this is thought to be important.

Concerns have been raised in respect of razor clam fishing in the region of Portmarnock beach. Fishing for razor clams in the area is not prohibited by the 1992 habitats directive as transposed into Irish law but is managed as a living aquatic resource under the Common Fisheries Policy. The harvesting of razor shells is subject to legislative controls and the areas in which such harvesting can take place is classified by ministerial regulations every six months following consideration of the results of a sampling programme.

A system of gatherer dockets is also implemented whereby important information is collected on the fishery in such aspects as the precise location and date of harvesting, the quantities involved and the destination of the harvested razor shells. The Department's marine inspectorate staff also carries out periodic inspections of fishing activity to ensure that harvesting activities are being undertaken in accordance with the prevailing regulations.

As part of the work of the molluscan species advisory group, established under the shellfish management framework and which includes a representative of the razor clam fishermen, a razor clam local advisory committee has been established and held its first meeting in March 2006. The next meeting is planned for January 2007. This committee is facilitated by BIM and will seek to develop a sustainable management framework for the fishery.

Community Development.

I wish to highlight the need for the Minister for Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs to provide an update on the current status of the application made by Mac Eoin Park residents association, Longford, for funding under the programme of grants for locally based community and voluntary organisations. The object of this scheme is to support the activities of local voluntary and community groups through grants for the refurbishment of existing premises used by such groups and that, where disadvantage in the community is being addressed, up to 90% of the cost will be met.

Mac Eoin Park residents association, is open to all residents of Mac Eoin Park and surrounding new developments and local agencies such as the VEC, local partnership, etc. The association has two houses, which were donated for the benefit of the association, and is situated in a very socially disadvantaged area with a high poverty index. The area suffers from extreme anti-social activity and drug and alcohol abuse. Some 70% of the residents of Mac Eoin Park are on some form of welfare, 60% are under 18 years of age and 33% are seriously disadvantaged.

Mac Eoin Park is situated in a RAPID designated area. The association runs a very successful national school after-school service but urgently needs to provide facilities to help adults, teenagers and other members of the community through education programmes in an educational setting to be provided at the centre. With the help of appropriate funding the Mac Eoin Park residents association could fully equip the community centre, enabling both adults and children to use the centre for educational and information purposes.

In its application for funding the residents association seeks to promote the interests of the Mac Eoin Park area and of the people of the locality as they pertain to the social, cultural and general welfare and common good of the community. There are significant and well-recognised social problems within certain local authority estates within Longford town, where a high level of long-term unemployment, generational unemployment, substance abuse, early school leaving, vandalism and crime are persistent and demoralising problems, leading to a breakdown and erosion of community morale.

The Mac Eoin Park residents association is an example of community-based self-help effort at its best. The advantages to an area like this, which suffers every social disadvantage imaginable, cannot be overstated and funding for this community project is an investment in the turnaround that we all hope can be achieved to improve the quality of life for such communities.

With the voluntary effort going into the provision of community services such as that of the Mac Eoin Park residents association, I expect that every effort can be made by the Department of Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs, through Pobal, to provide the necessary funding to assist this worthwhile venture. I commend the hard work of Mr. Peter Clyne, co-ordinator, Ms Isobel Daly, chairperson of the Mac Eoin Park residents association and the committee for their hard work and dedication to the project. The basis of the mixed economy of welfare is dependent on the endeavours of such committed people. I expect a positive response.

The Minister of State for Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs is mindful of the importance of funding under the programme of grants for locally based community and voluntary organisations. An application has been received from the group referred to by the Senator. Applications under the scheme of equipment grants and the scheme of training, education and research grants closed on 25 September. This application has been made under the scheme of equipment grants, one of three schemes under this programme, the other two being the refurbishment grants scheme and the training, education and research grants scheme.

I can confirm that almost 1,200 applications have been received to date under this programme. The significant level of interest in this programme highlights yet again its value to local groups. Clearly this particular programme helps to meet the needs of such groups in carrying out their valuable work in their communities. The equipment grants scheme enables local community organisations to buy IT equipment, photocopiers, phones, fax machines, desks or tables that their organisation needs. The refurbishment scheme allows groups to maintain or re-decorate community halls and other community facilities. The training, education and research scheme enables groups to build their own skill levels and to increase the capacity of their group to make a positive contribution in the lives of their community.

The Government considers this type of funding to communities to be of considerable importance. For this reason, the Government has provided an increase of funding for this programme from €3 million in 2006 to €13 million in the 2007 Estimates. The process of assessing the 1,200 applications so far received is a considerable one but has been under way since shortly after the 25 September closing date for the receipt of such applications. Each application must be assessed individually against the published criteria for the schemes before a final decision can be made.

I understand that this assessment process is proceeding and that recommendations on all complete applications received to date should be available to the Minister of State for Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs within eight to ten weeks. The refurbishment grants scheme remains open for applications for this current programme and, accordingly, further applications under that particular scheme continue to be received by the Department of Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs.

The group referred to by the Senator received an acknowledgement from that Department when its application was first submitted. Subsequently, on 20 October its application reference number was confirmed for any future correspondence.

I also understand that this group has submitted previous applications under this programme and I am glad to acknowledge that under last year's programme, its application under the scheme of equipment grants was successful. The grant on that occasion would have facilitated it in acquiring IT and other equipment which, I expect, will have been put to good use for the benefit of the Mac Eoin Park community.

As I have indicated, once the assessment process has been finalised and a decision is made on this group's latest application for equipment funding, the Department of Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs will be in contact with it immediately.

I thank the Tánaiste for his response and have no doubt that he will use his good offices to ensure this group is facilitated with funding.

The Seanad adjourned at 5.50 p.m. until2.30 p.m. on Tuesday, 28 November 2006.
Barr
Roinn